‘District 9′ Review
by John NolteWhile offering up one of the smarter political allegories to hit theaters in a long time, after an imaginative and compelling opening based on an imaginative and compelling premise, the second half of “District 9” doesn’t live up. The idea-bottom drops completely out of what was looking to be a potential sci-fi classic when the story suddenly turns and devolves into a B-grade, actioner – most of it photographed by that infernal shaky-cam, which is guilty of ruining more movies than Julia Roberts.
High above Johannesburg, South Africa, a lifeless spaceship hovers in the haze. No one knows where it came from or how it got there and for a while everyone seems content to wait for something to happen. But as time passes and nothing does, a decision is made to investigate. Once inside, investigators find the ship’s cargo: thousands upon thousands of alien beings who will come to be known as “Prawns.”
Twenty years pass and by now it’s become obvious that these 1.8 million aliens are unable to care for themselves or integrate into human society. Like animals, they scour garbage piles for food, are hostile towards equally hostile citizens and have had to be segregated in District 9, a ghettoized internment camp guarded by Multi-National United (MNU), a private corporation involved in everything from military contracting to medical experimentation.
As tensions continue to rise between human and alien, MNU builds District 10, a camp settled 240km from the city. Charged with overseeing what amounts to a forced relocation and creating an appearance of bureaucratic legality around it, is Wikus Van De Merwes (Sharlto Copley), a marginal man with ambitions that are only fulfilled because his father-in-law happens to be the boss.
Van De Merwes’ Inspector Clouseau-ish demeanor disguises a sadistic streak that unfolds quickly as he, his subordinates and a platoon of heavily-armed MNU enforcers roll into District 9. An intimidating show of force backs Van De Mewes up as he knocks on the doors of shacks made from salvaged scrap and with clipboard in hand “asks” for a voluntary authorization to relocate.
This bureaucratic boondoggle immediately increases tensions giving MNU Mercenaries all the excuse they need to shoot uncooperative Prawns as the hapless Van Der Mewes takes great delight in aborting Prawn fetuses. What we’re initially led to believe is something more akin to animal cruelty changes abruptly when Christopher Johnson arrives, a Prawn with a brain, a plan and a vial of rocket fuel that sprays Van Der Mewes in the face and seals both their fates.
The story offers a number of unanswered questions that draw you in (where do the aliens come from?) but too many others that frustrate (why is Christopher Johnson so much more intelligent than his Prawn counterparts?). Whereas the lack of an origin story only builds the mystery, a single capable Prawn out of nearly two million comes off as a lazy, frustrating plot contrivance.
But nothing’s as lazy as the film’s last half which abruptly shrugs off all the originality that came before in exchange for a predictable plot that has “the hero” breaking into a thing to get a thing to make another thing work and save the day. Worse still, this disappointing boilerplating looks like it was filmed during a seizure and edited in a blender. For forty-minutes you’ll find yourself in that numbed stupor (interrupted only by watch-checking) that’s becoming an increasingly common experience at the movies these days.
For both political and visual reasons, Johannesburg works as a unique and fascinating backdrop. It’s immediately apparent that the story’s physical scope will be somewhat contained for budgetary reasons (though the special effects are seamless), but ambitious introductory themes and allegory initially lift the narrative above the television movie feel that eventually takes over.
What “District 9″ is and wants to be “about” is wisely left up to the viewer. The simplest guess is a rehashing of South African apartheid, but with that outrage long past this seems unlikely. After all, even more brutal than the mostly-white MNU is a bottom-feeding Nigerian gang who exploit and abuse the Prawn, going so far as to murder and eat them in their pagan voodoo rituals.
To producer Peter Jackson’s and director, co-writer Neill Blomkamp’s credit, the message could be as broad as “Be Nice to Each Other,” as Leftist as the “plight” of the Palestinians or something more sensible like the story of the Jews before the founding of Israel, life in Afghanistan had Gore succeeded in stealing Florida, a condemnation of Communism or even abortion.
Unfortunately, the weak story can’t journey a single one of these intriguing ideas towards any kind of satisfying conclusion. But a second chance seems inevitable. Thanks to an inconclusive ending and a strong opening weekend we can expect a “District 9″ sequel pretty soon.
Let’s just hope the script’s smarter and someone budgets a tri-pod for the cinematographer.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
113 Comments
District 9 proved to me that a turd can only float so long as no one flushes the toilet. Both Thumbs down on this smelly piece of crap. Woosh! Gurgle!
The big mistake here was not making the aliens more human, more worthy of respect and dignity. By making them monsters (save the brilliant Christopher) the political allegory angle essentially self-implodes.
As far as Christopher being the only ambitious one, let's not forget that space thing got buried under his house. The others had nothing to work with.
Our hero isn't looking to "save the day." He's looking to save himself.
I have to agree on the "infernal shaky cam". It worked for the first 20 minutes of Saving Private Ryan, but it has turned everything else into an experiment in nausea. I might see the film anyway, but I'll be popping Dramamine with my Jujubes at the theatre.
Considering its tiny budget, D9 is technically impressive but it just isn't that likable. It's really difficult to care for any of the human characters and the boney prawns look like Madonna without the wig – just put them out of their misery. It's a lot like last years' Cloverdale, a noisy chaos that's quickly forgotten until next year when the next shaky-cam-fan-boy favorite becomes 'this year's Distrct 9'.
I LOVED THIS MOVIE!!! The review pointed out the minor plot flaws and I do agree with them a bit. It was intense, pretty violent, showed ugly, barbaric, prejudice behavior by humans. Awesome depiction of the slums of South Africa (as the District 9) and the ominous mysterious ship. It took you to a potentially real, ugly world on the edge of your seat. It had cheesy moments near the end and a couple things didn't make complete sense, but I could live with them because it was totally imaginative and unlike any movie plot and portrayal that I have ever seen.
I saw this flick. It was a piece of junk. I couldn't wait for it to end.
use your imaginations here folks, not all art needs to be spoonfed to yous. I like that they left out the details. Are you telling me that you weren't overwhelmed with joy when the warlord got whacked?
He didn't take "great delight" in aborting the prawns. He did it apathetically just like a Leftist. The founder of planned parenthood called this the "Plan for Peace." Hitler did it. The Communists made the gas he used. It is a tenet of Leftism.
When the government is responsible for the well being of society, they get to make these decisions. More "Prawns" equal more of a burden. This argument applies to immigration as well. Socialism makes us responsible for everyone entering the country and every baby they have. So the people shouldering the burden start to resent them. And start doing things like this. (also depicted in Atlas Shrugged)
SPOILER:
i also like some room to fill in the blanks. especially the question at the end. Will they come back and declare war on us?
Possible spoilers, don't read if you whine about that sort of thing.
I found D9 to be dissapointing, but did not find it to be as bad as the author did. I thought the focus on the change in the main character was the anchor of the film, and in that regard, the film was impressive. The shaky camara not so fun after a while, but the pseudo documentary worked well in explaining the backdrop. The aliens also seem real – they are neither inherently benevolent nor violent.
The political subplot was weak – Mankiewicks, supposedly the smarter half of the current At the movies duo somehow threw in his review that "this sort of activity" is better left to "governments, and not corporations", because as we all know, experimentation on humans and mass murder has historically been done companies like Enron (see Third Riech and Pol Pot).
That said, large plot holes remain – where are the ship's leaders? Down to 1 from 1 millioin prawns? Where are the weapons from? Why don't the aliens use the weapons? Why doesn't MNU recruit some aliens to use the weapons, since apparently, we know how to communicate? In 20 years, Christopher finds the last amount of "fuel" on the day the evacuation occurs? The most important liquid in the plot is hidden in an open canister?
It reminded me of a BBC Fictional Drama. Lower budget but with some good special effects; a rather dodgy story line; suspicious sets and decent overacting. Are we sure this wasn't a Dr Who episode that turned into a full-length script? I'd give it 2.5 out of 5 stars–a good effort.
I gotta give the filmmakers credit for getting this done and getting it distributed like they did.
@John: If you watch this film again you'll see that there are many different variations of Aliens. Usually through color then structure. There are docile and violent ones. Smart ones as well. Christopher though is the lucky one. He has the 'key' to leave the Planet. What really never was fully explained was why the 'key' was jettisoned in the first place.
If you watch the very beginning (which I agree the 1st half is best story wise) most is explained. You are correct that the effects work is very seamless. I also liked how the violence played out as well. Never exploited. It felt real. Which was the point of this movie. To create a realistic feel a 'what if?'.
I agree that the third act was mostly about action and does set up a sequel though it also holds it's own as a stand-alone. Is it great? No. But then it's one of the best of it's elk in a long time. It also shows you can release a movie without stars and a unknown behind the camera and create great efx work for $30 million. I still can't for the life of me figure how Bay and others need to spend 150-200+ million.
But Bay has the #1 movie of the year box-office wise… so he is still encouraged to make empty, hollow spectaculars.
I await Neil's next film though. He reminds me of a new Robert Rodriguez. Being original, creative and cost-effective.
The problem with saying that Christopher is the only one with anything to work with is that there's a sub-genre of literature built around the premise that that's not true. Books like "Robinson Crusoe" and "The Mysterious Island" are built around taking a modern (for the book's time period) man and marooning him somewhere with none of the trappings of modern civilization. The characters in these stories, as opposed to "District 9", inevitably take their knowledge of what is possible and proceed to apply it to improve their lives.
I'm hard pressed to believe that out of a population of over a million prawns, only one would have the ambition to do anything about his situation. Sure the others might not have access to what Christopher has but that doesn't mean they have nothing to work with and nothing with which to improve their lot in life.
I think the "key" fell all on it's own and it was just pure luck that Christopher found it or perhaps he found it and then decided to build his shack on top of it.
By the 3rd act i was ready for some real action. I don't know who would be looking at their watches when those weapons start going off.
TT — He had a major case of Little Man Syndrome. Like Jimmy Cagney in "Mister Roberts" he delighted in the sadistic, showed off his pathetic "powers" even though at heart he knew he was nothing without his immoral authority to lord it over a conquered species.
You're forgetting that at the start, they specifically say that these are some sort of worker or drone type people. I liken them to North Koreans who have been so beaten down that they cannot do for themselves. They live for the State.
So based on John's review I come away with this; Its not great but it doesn't suck as bad as you'd think it does.
Damning praise … ok, I'll see it but I won't pay full evening prices to do so.
So based on John's review I come away with this; Its not great but it doesn't suck as bad as you'd think it would.
Damning praise … ok, I'll see it but I won't pay full evening prices to do so.
The examples using Communism are endless. You have the FARC's in Columbia who are told who to mate with. (and that's all it is to them) Same in Cambodia under Pol Pot. You eat what you are told, when you are told.
One of the first things Castro did was tell people what jobs they were going to have. It wasn't long ago when Castro was ill and reports came out that the people of Cuba literally wouldn't know what to do next. It's a repulsive thought and it ain't no sci-fi movie either.
I basically agree on the RR comment. The 1st half was way to meaty and thought provoking for RR though I still love some of RR's 'fun' pictures. You know it's kinda funny but in a way D9 is like Dusk Till Dawn. The 1st half of that was greatness the 2nd half just action filled w/humor but no more smarts though one of the best lines comes from Cheech at the end of the movie. And for my money I'll bet the 1st half is so good because of QT's involvement.
I still admire D9. I agree that if they could have kept up the 1st half's promise this would be an instant sci-fi classic. As for the shaky cam… boy you must really hate Paul Greengrass.
Keep reviewing, I keep commenting when felt compelled too. Thanks
If Paul Greengrass was on fire I wouldn't spit on him.
Also hated Quantum of Solace and freaking despised Cloverfield.
I can say "God Damn the Shaky Cam" because it's not using the Lord's name in vain. I mean it.
OK, am I dumb because I really liked this movie? To me, the best part of the movie was the ending.
Wow John, I couldn't disagree with you more about the third act. I found it refreshingly original in that every time I thought I knew what was going to happen, it would take a different turn.
As for the plot holes, I am fine with a movie not answering every question. It gives you something to discuss when it is over.
But there's a difference between a plot hole and a question. Where the aliens came from is a question, why they didn't use the weapons, have any kind of societal hierarchy, or — as someone said above — MNU didn't recruit an alien to fire the weapons for them are plot holes. Big uns.
My first complaints were definitely that this movie falls into too many stereotypical sci-fi blunders. A space craft powered by a tall-boy of tobacco juice? That alters human DNA into that of a completely alien species? Weapons that look like they were designed by a 3rd grader during study hall, with hand grips that read your DNA?
I tend to take these sort of things as signs of eather lack of imagination, or laziness in creating the world your story takes place in. Why couldn't the weapons have instead been activated by, let's say, wrist bands meant for the Prawn's on-board security forces, and kept hidden either on the ship or the lander? Why couldn't Wykus' transformation have been caused by, I don't know, the Prawns actually being composed, like Earth's jellyfish, of not a single life-form, but a colony of symbiotes, which by freak chance crossed over the species barrier in his case? Why couldn't the lander have simply been missing a key, taken by MNU when the Prawn responsible for it was whisked away to their labs?
[...] the article here: ‘District 9′ Review This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
*SPOILER ALERT*
They didn't use the weapons because they were not resisting. They seemed to be happy to live in the colony and trade weapons for cat food. The only ones that expressed an interest in going home where Christopher and his buddy.
They didn't have a hierarchy because they were all worker drones. Imagine them to be an ant colony without a queen.
The MNU didn't recruit an alien to fire the weapons because that was not their goal. Their goal was to make the weapons human-usable. Vikus has the DNA to make that possible.
These answers, and many more, were filled out while my buddies and I enjoyed ice cream after the movie.
Excellent point.
we'll respectfully disagree on 'Quantum of Solace' easily the most misunderstood Bond film ever.
'Cloverfield' had an element of suspense which helped it overcome it's (many) flaws.
Haven't seen 'District 9' yet. Seems a political tract; tired of same. But we agree on Greengrass…
we'll respectfully disagree on 'Quantum of Solace', easily the most misunderstood Bond film ever.
'Cloverfield' had an element of suspense which helped it overcome it's (many) flaws.
Haven't seen 'District 9' yet. Seems a political tract; tired of same. But we agree on Greengrass…
Further proof that truth is stranger (and more grotesque) than fiction.
I have not seen the film. Jackson is a great director. The reason I will not see the film is that I do not like the shaky camera format. Little bits within a film are ok, but i refuse to have my senses pushed around anymore. If it is a shaky cam pic, I won't go to the theatrical. If it is of interest, I will rent the dvd so that I can turn it off if the shaky cam gets annoying. Shaky cam – just say no. I wish all the best and hope the film is a hit, but I won't go if any film is shaky cam. No more.
The film explained (well, suggested) why Christopher and CJ were smarter than the others. Recall the documentary theorized that the other Prawns were workers and that their leaders (Christopher) had abandoned ship.
District 9 is stupid, trivial, and most of all downright boring. A snorefest and the reason the critics are fawning and tripping over it with praise. Oh, maybe they like to see Black men sucking blood and eating flesh of white mutants so they can become more superior as if they are nothing more than black dumbies. Oh, lets not forget these critics slammed Terminator Salvation as being a ripoff from Transformer because of a particular robot that shows up and blows up everything in site, yet this is the same fricking ROBOT that goes on a rampage killing everything in site in this film as well. I think this one could have come from Ironman, or Terminator Salvation or even transformer. Talk about ripoff and talk about your basic last thirty minutes of blowing every fricking thing in site, well this is it. Oh, lets not forget the fricking critics are saying this is original. I suppose you can make anything out of ANYTHING if you want too and another reason why the film critics have become non existent to many of us. My recommendation is forget this mess unless you are influenced by critics then by all means go out and spend your hard earn money on this crap.
What I really want to know – and what was left unsaid, was how much did the Nigerian hookers charge to service a prawn?
I saw it last weekend. Not a great movie but an entertaining one. There were all kinds of holes in the script for me. There's this monstrous spaceship hovering over Johannesburg for 20 years and no attempt is made to learn about the technology? As John mentioned only Christopher was the "smart" prawn – I had to laugh at the Wikus Van De Merwes character – he seemed to act like a typical bureaucrat. Maybe a Nazi bureaucrat.
Agreed with the shaky cam. It is more annoying than art form. As to the sequel, will Christopher get back? Will Wilcus' wife get back together?
That's about right! I paid $5.50 for the first show. Not worth $9 though.
Just came home from this movie and wish I had seen this review first. Aside from plot holes which I couldn't care more about, the obscene violence in this movie (which was rated 14A in Ontario) had some parents taking their kids from the theatre about half way through.
I agree with the author whole-heatedly about the confusion of messaging – was this a movie a political statement about current global issues on war and poverty, or was it an action packed sci-fi film? Trying to merge the two genres, in my mind, completely discredited both and left me feeling disturbed, disappointed and angry.
I can excuse the Cloverfield shakycam because there was at least some minor justification for it, since we were supposed to know it was "filmed from a handheld camcorder" as part of the story. Anywhere else, it's just lazy.
Exactly. The Prawns came across as nothing more than animals so you wonder where the "prejudice" comes from.
Did we watch the same move here people? Every movie ever create can be guilty of "plot holes". All the different types of aliens had different roles similar to colony of bees.
This film was brilliant. I think some people should check if their IQ is over 75 before posting their comments.
The whole point of this movie was to give you the audience a mixed message. That creates analysis and debate. This was a commentary on the human affliction and how we treat each other and how we treat things we just don't understand. 99% of you here have no clue what you just watched.
So it could read as an allegory for North Korea. Those people are going to be floundering around like headless chickens when Kim Jong-il finally dies — and in "those people" I also include the entire government.
After Christopher arrives I thought a possible explanation was that "keeping" them for so long had sapped them of their individuality and ambition.
So Christopher's some sort of alien Howard Roark type, then.
I didn't catch that explanation at all. And to build on it they should've shown more intelligent Prawns than just the one… There was no hierarchy in that society, no organization… It was as wild as a monkey cage. If there were some "smart" ones, why no structure. After Christopher arrives I thought a possible explanation was that "keeping" them for so long had sapped them of their individuality and ambition.
I do look forward to the sequel, however, and did admire much of the film. Hopefully the sequel will strengthen what worked in this one and leave the shaky-cam, B-action for lousier movies.
the first half was better than anything Robert Rodriguez has done. The second half was very RR.
Like Jimmy Cagney in "Mister Roberts" he delighted in the sadistic, showed off his pathetic "powers" even though at heart he knew he was nothing without his immoral authority to lord it over a conquered species.
In other words, he's a Leftist.
I personally thought this was a great movie. It did the job of a summer action sci-fi flick well and entertained. I can't see why so many of you are unable to see past a few plot-holes and can't get down to the movie as a whole. The Shaky camera seemed to add to the overall mood of the film for me. Everything worked together near flawlessly. I also can't see why the last 20 to 30 minutes of stuff getting blown up is viewed as such a bad thing. I found it to be quite original in the sense that this mech isn't an unstoppable killing force that will never be silenced. It gets slowly destroyed and you want to see Wikus survive and destroy enough for Cristopher to get back to the mothership.
Personally, I think this film will win the Huego for 'Dramatic Act Long Term'. If not, it will without a doubt be nominated.
I liked it – thought it was entertaining but it could have been better…
That´s because a director with Spielberg´s ability can walk the tightrope. In the Ryan opening and closing scene, the camera is not all that shaky – and not that up-close – compared to certain other movies. There are just enough recognizable shots to tell you where you are and what is happening.
BTW… Isn't Jackson just the producer of the film, not its director?
And, I agree, I too hate the overuse of the "shaky cam." Much more bothersome than the overuse of bullet-time and the music-video-like-slo-mo-take-of-the-actors-sauntering-towards-the-camera-like-badass-mo-fos-while-funky-music-plays-in-the-background.
Sci-Fi is my fav, but I wait until it's for rent for $3.00
I'll grant that I haven't seen the movie, but It would hardly be the first alien race with a number of dumb workers and few smarter leaders/whatever. Ringo's Posleen and the small percentage of "god kings" that grow into leadership positions, with the very knowledge and skillsets determined by long-ago genertic tampering are but one small example that were intially portrayed as dumb, mindless hordes and revealed to be far more than that.
There are plot holes, and there are plot holes.
Take GI Joe forex.
***POTENTIAL SPOLIER***
I overall liked the film, but watching the (previously floating) icepack come down completely shot any suspension of disbelief I had.
Another SCI FI coming up short…. and honestly I will see it and allow my imagination to make the PRAWNS into evil people like Harry Reid…. and the other lefties running this country into the ground!
Wow, did some of the folks commenting here see the same movie I did? Both my son (20) and I LOVED this movie. Yes, there were plot holes, but then what movie doesn't have them. Yes, there were lots of "whys". BUT I found the movie compelling and thoroughly enjoyable. Maybe folks were expecting another LotR because of Peter Jackson's involvement. Compared to most of the other junk in the theaters this summer, District 9 shines.
BTW It was clearly explained in the beginning that the surviving "Prawns" inside the ship were leaderless and it was theorized by the commentator in the film that they were just the workers and that without their leaders, the "Prawns" were basically clueless on what to do. I took the view that they were like an insect society with a rigid and specialized class structure. As to 'Christopher' it was plain as day from the moment you meet him in the film that he was different from the rest of the "Prawns" and that his son was even more so. Rather than answer our questions, the film allowed us to fill in the blanks. Maybe that's why I enjoyed it so much; I was a "Prawn with a brain" willing to figure it out rather being a "Prawn waiting to be told what to think."
Peter Jackson took a tired, worn out, oft used meme, and converted it into a compelling story. This one has something for everyone (well, except for romance), and tells a pretty good tale. I really liked this movie. I look forward to the sequel, which should be delightfully violent, considering the treatment the aliens received.
I think this movie did leave a lot of holes open, but on purpose. I don't like being spoon fed the story, and how to interpret it. This was very well done, in that respect.
I like elk myself. Very yummy.
John Nolte not only missed the boat – he missed the mother ship.
Just as Borat is a lot funnier for people who understand Hebrew, so is District 9 a lot more poignant for people who experienced life in the 'Old' South Africa.
From a plot standpoint, Nolte and the comment authors seem to suggest that only one smart Prawn out of the bunch doesn't make sense, but think about it – it only takes one or two Franklins, Fords or Einsteins to reshape the world for millions.
South African apartheid…Funny that. For myself who has watched the show already knows that in this time-line, it is still in effect! The movie is chronicled at about a little over twenty years. It started in 1982 and ended around 2002 and the movie bookends the story with some documentary, so this could of been made even later.
The rage built out of the White suppressing the Black that climaxed with Apartheid and its final demise was squelched by the Aliens. Now the suppressed Blacks could look down at something too in this story and the video documentary showed this by interviewing a Black lady in a car in the beginning! Also notice that the majority of Speaking actors are White too. I honestly don't know what this director was attempting to tell, but the basic story of a father and son trying to get home is the most noticeable.
Shaky cams started around the time of the third movie of 'Die Hard' and that sucker gave me a headache for it. Then t.v. became "innovated" and wobbled the cam to success like 'CSI' that finally infected into hollyweird cinema with the release of the aborted mess name 'The Bourne Supremacy' ~Bourne 2~ that in my eyes looked to have a cinematographer mounted on a riding bull! Because of the restrictions of special effects, the only moment in the Entire movie now shaking was the explosion of that house in the middle of it.
From that one movie, the art of movie making went down the drain and never looked back…
Finally.
Seriously, Twenty years and no attempt to reverse engineer that Big floating Saucer?! Honestly, there should've been an entire town of scientists and engineers within that ship! 20 flipping Years and.. nothing?
If I have to use my imagination, shouldn't the ticket be cheaper?
LOL! Boo-yah!
The Prawn Christopher was the actual hero. More than this, following what seems inescapable logic, he was the slave master and the other prawns were slaves, starving in the cargo hold. His escape cannot be good for Earth or the slaves remaining behind.
The film points out what some here in comments still don't understand or recognize: the value for life is not about how useful (or smart or talented or otherwise, exceptional) any other life is, but that it is life that is valuable, even the dumb, drone, unattractive, the "animals" among us so some refer to the Prawns. I think that's the big statement this film is making, that life is valuable because it's life, it's inherently valuable, even when "it's" not necessarily stellar or stunning. I note that some here remark that the Prawns are "just dumb animals" and "should be put out of their misery" which exemplifies what the film is pointing out and making complaint about. If only the lone "smart" Prawns is of value (to be appreciated and interacted with, tolerated, in other words, because he's exceptional), then, that's monstrous — but perhaps the film's not getting that point across with enough emphasis…
I agree!!! This movie was wayyyyyy overrated!!! "the best sci-fi" in a decade??LOL… My thumbs were pointing down after the first 30 minutes were shot in that overdone "docu-style" shooting. I thought I was watching the "OFFICE"….. DOcu-mockumentaries style shooting is DEAD ppl!!
I agree with the "shaky camera" thing: it's been far overused, abused and lived past what should have been a two-picture term.
Not even average home movies are this shaky. So I fail to even get what it is the ongoing "shaky camera" effects in features is even about (they're certainly not bespeaking of that unseen character in features that the camera, when camera point-of-view is emphasized, is supposed to be — it's more like they're pointing out that, "hey, I'm makin' a film here, I'm filmin' here…"). Meaning, it's a ridiculous, false effect, and by that, the effect reduces credibility of the film in which it's used. The viewer immediately is reminded that they can't "suspend disbelief" so the film fails.
P.S.
Hey NOLTE, (I WAS WRONG) You were right about GI JOE as well….it did suck!!!
". . . photographed by that infernal shaky-cam"
That's enough for me; Netflix it is.
Use your imagination folks, stop over analyzing. Movie succeeded in at least getting many of us to think about the human condition past and present.
I hope Peter Jackson takes more of a lead on the sequel(s),
Use your imagination folks, stop over analyzing. Movie succeeded in at least getting many of us to think about the human condition past and present.
Screenwriter Neil Blomkamp is a SA exile, forced by crime-waves in post-Apartheid SA to flee (like most middle/working class Whites). He has said that the movie explicitly is about post-Apartheid SA, not the Apartheid SA. The Aliens are mostly stupid and lazy because they cannot do anything without their leaders, of which only one survives. [Direct Parallels to post-Mandela, no Steve Biko SA.] They cannot even be bothered with their technology without their leaders. Which is what makes them "alien" to more middle/working class Westerners.
It's also about immigration — there are huge Nigerian crime syndicates in Johannesburg, and Zimbabwe immigrants legal or not face necklacing by native SA peoples. The despair in the movie is Blomkamp's despair over SA — neither Apartheid nor post-Apartheid "worked" and things only get worse not better. [The standard "evil corporation" stuff is Hollywood creative types tantrum -- they get treated badly by studios so repeat the process with "the little people" and write "revenge" stuff that is childish.]
This is probably why the movie is unsatisfying — there did not seem to be any possibility of a good outcome.
I suspect the biggest thing will be how amazing the movie looked for a pittance.
Well, it amusing that some movies are damn for having too many PLOT HOLES and others are praised for it. I suppose it all depends on the person viewing the film. Overall and from where I sat the film starts out stupid, remains stupid, then turns stupid funny or tries to be, then turns stupid again. No wonder the majority of critics liked it.
I'm pretty sure most of this film was done with a tripod or Steadicam, then effects and alines added and finally a software-made camera shake.
I wish Nolte wouldn't have named the mysterious substance in the canister. Wondering what that was made for half the fun.
Slight spoilers:
Christopher was likely either the hive leader or a son-of-hive-leader who came down in the command ship. Not sure why he abandoned his apparently-beloved people to starvation and squalor in the first place, but I'm sure it has to do with the "peaceful native" story in the latter part of the movie.
I think that IS the point of making them look this way. I find it nearly inconceivable that people can find other humans as actually subhuman, yet the Holocaust, American slavery, Saddam Hussein and Pol Pot's genocides and today's slavery abroad all show this to be true. They acted like animals because we treated them like animals. We kept them locked up in a cage even making breeding illegal; baby Prawn were exterminated essentially in ovens.
I'd love for the sequel to be about the aliens peacefully coming to earth to settle, even in remote areas. Then perhaps we can have an honest debate of illegal immigration.
I agree with Bill Brandt.
It was enjoyable, but could have been better. I think I was mostly fascinated by the interactions between humans and aliens. F/X in the 21st century is cool!
My wife and I talked about this movie off-and-on for hours after we saw it. A summer action movie that makes one think? Some thoughts in response to both the review and many of the comments:
- imagine the Pilgrims landing at Plymouth Rock, by all accounts exhausted, sick, and demoralized. Imagine that rather than being nurtured through their first winters by the locals, they were instead corralled into a stockade with marginal food and no familiar supplies or access to sanitary conditions.
- imagine Joe Sixpack (times 1.2 million) jammed into such a stockade forced to scavenge to survive. How many of US (I lump me in this J.S. group) could scavenge anything of genuine use?
- leaderless, what sort of Lord of the Flies society would emerge? (This seemed the largest weakness of the film to me: There was no apparent community in the Prawn camp) Based on the comments here, I am pretty sure a few thugs would grab the weapons and create a jack-booted autocracy and call it good government. The Prawns have what appears to be socialism. You don't see them fighting each other and selling each other out. There are no Prawn Haves living large at the expense of the Have Nots.
- The Prawns are presented as animalistic, yet with nothing to improve their lot and forced to scavenge, how could they not? This is what happens when slums form. Meanwhile, the humans in power are truly barbaric, and the rest are uninterested in what's really happening. No overtones here for you, people? MNU is torturing and doing genetic experiments on the Prawns in order to gain access to their superior weapons.
- The Prawns, despite having massively superior weaponry, do not aggress. They are described in the opening moments as peaceful. Very Gandhi-like, no? Ahhh, but they're ugly and Not Like Us, so they must be Evil.
An intriguing movie that is not U-Rah-Rah in the way that Independence Day was, District 9 shines an uncomfortable light on human nature.
Everybodies stuck on the whole treatment of aliens. I give it a thumbs down again on realism with respect to technology. How can stupid aliens living in shacks make a Biomechanoid Assault Suit. This type of technology requires much skill, knowledge and industry to produce. Just like all the hokey manufacturing processes used for the ship in "Sunshine" quite actually the worst sci fi film this millenium.
I just saw this, and I have several issues with your review.
"Van De Merwes’ Inspector Clouseau-ish demeanor disguises a sadistic streak"
Nonsense. Van De Merwes is routinely polite and deferential, commanding his men to 'back off' repeatedly even after one of them is killed by a Prawn. He does use the intimidation that adheres to his office to force signatures, but that is his job, and he certainly does not act 'sadistic' in any way. That's how we're able to like his character.
"This bureaucratic boondoggle immediately increases tensions giving MNU Mercenaries all the excuse they need to shoot uncooperative Prawns"
Again, nonsense. Yes, there are lots of soldiers and there are shootings. But they do not look for 'excuses' to 'shoot uncooperative Prawns'. Several times they voluntarily put themselves in great danger specifically to avoid that outcome.
"as the hapless Van Der Mewes takes great delight in aborting Prawn fetuses."
True, but you seem to have missed the part where he asks the 'smart Prawn' if he has a permit for his kid. Apparently breeding of the aliens is controlled – for obvious reasons – so when he finds the breed farm there's little else he can do.
I also think it's more than a bit of a stretch to try to look at this movie as allegory. Yes, the director was 'influenced to do it from his apartheid experience, and it uses some side-references (such as name-checking 'concentration camps') but it is not an allegory – or if it is, the execution is too poor for it to work (hostile creepy aliens simply do not work as a substitute for racial differences, something proven time and again). It's old-form sci-fi-action. Which is why I loved the second half, although the whole movie had several plot contrivances. It was the best way it could have gone, rather than having society weep about how we need to 'accept the Prawn!' and so forth.
I despise when people bring political bias to reviews, just as I despise when people put political bias into films. This was just a fun movie, and the best sci-fi I've seen in a long time.
Wow! Pretty harsh on the flick. I loved it and don't see how it devolved as you view it. Let's take one of your points: Why is one Prawn so much smarter than the others? You were able to accept the premise of the movie at the start, an alien spaceship arrives at earth, effectively broken down, and occupied by a million Prawn which were in poor shape, apparently unable to utilize any of the technology on the ship to even take care of themselves. Even though they possess advanced weaponry only they can use, they never thought to use it en masse to protect themselves from human depredation. None of this does not *seem* to make sense either, no? Yet, up to that point, you were okay with the premise. Why? Because we are looking at it as humans, and not as Prawn, for one, and there is so much about them we don't know. THAT'S part of the wonder and thrill of the film.
Perhaps the prawn are ant-like in their social structure. Perhaps Christopher Johnson is the rare King or Queen prawn who has the intellect and "command" brain to both understand the tech completely, and use it effectively, perhaps even to act. ____I don't know, but I DO know that a major point of the film is that they are alien, VERY ALIEN, so a lot about their culture, society and basic physiology are very different than ours. Their technology inter-acts with their biology, for God's sake! WG
It was simply a very good film, at a time when most films are recycled special effects mindless crap. You can read whatever you want into the plot, the director did not go out to make some huge political statement (well maybe a small one). The film, has a unique plot, well acted, good direction, sci fi elements, a very cool mech battle, awesome weapons. Basically everything you want in a film, it rocked and is highly recomended.
AS A VERY EXPERIENCED SENIOR CITIZEN SCI-FI READER AND MOVIE FANATIC SINCE CHILDHOOD, I WAS SICK TO HEAR ALL THE ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY CONTINUOUS GUTTER LANGUAGE IN THE FILM WHICH DESTROYED IT FOR ME. LUCKY THAT I DID NOT SEE IT WITH MY SON AND DAUGHTER.. THE FILTHY LANGUAGE IS NOT NECESSARY TO TELL A GOOD TALE—PERIOD! SCI-FIES, LIKE THE OLD AND GOOD WESTERN MOVIES WERE ALWAYS 'CLEAN' AND EXCITING TO WATCH OR READ. THE FOREIGN FILM MAKERS THINK THAT ALL OF US AMERICANS WANT TO HEAR CONTINUOUS GUTTER LANGUAGE. I DON'T THINK SO!! LET THEM CURSE AT THEIR FRIENDS, BUT KEEP IT OFF A GOOD FILM—OK??
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
[…] … great article that everyone should read […]…
[...]The information mentioned in the article is some of the best available [...]……
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.