‘G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra’ Review
by John NolteAs if the makers of “G.I. Joe” hadn’t mucked up their own publicity enough by immediately politicizing the film with an announcement that all the crass Americanism would be stripped from our favorite action heroes in favor of a more global approach, on Monday director Stephen Sommers decided to polarize audiences even more hectoring we RedStaters not to misinterpret the deep well of subtext put into his creation: ”[T]his is not a George Bush movie – it’s an Obama world[.]”
And indeed “G.I. Joe” does remind of an Obama world: It cost too much, doesn’t deliver and we should all get back our cash for this clunker.
While nowhere near as soul-deadening as “Transformers 2” or the latest “Harry Potter,” you still feel like you’re watching someone else play a video game for two hours. The creative imagination spent to produce all-kinds of cool gadgets and weaponry obviously left nothing for plot, character or even a hint of logic. One of the bigger action scenes is a chase through the streets of Paris involving the combined force of a dozen “Joes,” deadly missiles and million-dollar accelerator suits all in pursuit of a Hummer filled with bad guys. Oh sure, there’s sound, fury, car crashes, and explosions galore, but never an explanation for why no one shoots out the Hummer’s tires.
The overall plot’s even dumber. McCullen (Christopher Eccleston), an international weapons manufacturer with a grudge against the French (the film’s only touch of Americanism), has invented a missile that lets loose a gajillion termite-like nano-bots capable of devouring everything they’re exposed to. Even though he’s invented the weapon and has it in his possession, McCullen inexplicably hands it over to the U.S. Military for transport so he can steal it back and have someone else weaponize it. Not only are we expected to buy the idea that an inventor can’t weaponize his own invention, but that an arch-villain with fleets of high-tech submarines and jets at his command would have the weapon driven to its first target in the aforementioned Hummer.
The G.I. Joe squad is run by Hawk (Dennis Quaid), an American General who recruits, trains and makes part of his special-ops team the best and brightest from 23 nations. Duke (Channing Tatum) and Ripcord (Marlon Wayans) were part of the military transport ambushed by McCullen and saved by the “Joes.” Hawk’s had his eye on Duke for a while and brings both to his secret facility hidden deep beneath the Egyptian sand. In less time than it takes for, say, a montage set to a remixed pop song and an awkward Brendan Fraser cameo, both men are trained and ready to go.
For an origin story – the rise of Cobra – no one’s motivation makes a lick of sense. Other than revenge against the French (which hardly makes him unsympathetic), McCullen’s endgame is never fully explained and one character’s Darth Vader-ish turn to the darkside comes completely out of nowhere after a look at a real neat-o piece of military hardware.
A number of back stories are told through frequent flashbacks that halt an already lumbering plot to a complete stop. Marginal films have delivered the same information with a line of exposition or a shared look. All of the performances are wooden, there’s no memorable dialogue, and the Will Smith-lite comic relief (yep, Wayans) is more than a little reminiscent of a train wreck called Jar Jar.
There’s no coherent explanation of what the ultimate stakes are and therefore even less suspense or sense of peril. There is a moment at the end that tries to wrap up what it all meant with a big reveal, but by then it’s too late and the promise of a sequel feels like more of a threat.
“G.I. Joe’s” politics are a result of omission, not what’s up on the screen. At first, Paramount Studio’s decision to rip the heart from an American icon and lie about how not doing so would hurt the international box office made me angry. But after sitting through the numbing experience of watching the end-product, I’m now rather grateful. If it wasn’t for resentment I wouldn’t have felt anything.






Subscribe via RSS
93 Comments
Think I'll skip this one.
Another entry into the "Miss it if you can" file.
"If it wasn’t for resentment I wouldn’t have felt anything"
Great line.
I hope this movie fails just like Hussein and his Cuban healthcare.
Going by the 80s cartoon, if the Joes had shot out the Hummer's tires the bad guys would have just parachuted to safety.
I saw G.I. Joe last night. It was on AMC. Sure the program guide called it "The Dirty Dozen" but it was about American soldiers kicking bad guy butt and that was good enough for me. This thing that's out in the theaters? Sounds like I can safely give it a pass. Maybe I'll watch it when it comes on AMC. Maybe.
"…but never an explanation for why no one shoots out the Hummer’s tires."
Maybe it's because, in the real world, one Predator with a Hellfire would solve the problem.
"Going by the 80s cartoon, if the Joes had shot out the Hummer's tires the bad guys would have just parachuted to safety."
WIN!!!!!!
"[T]his is not a George Bush movie.."
Right. Because we had so many of those.
Loved it. I went in expecting an action-packed movie starring live action versions of the toys that have been around since 1982 (this isn't based on the 1964 G.I. Joe) and that's exactly what I got. The action is top notch. The vehicles, gadgets and visual effects kept me glued to the screen. The current incarnation of G.I. Joe (and what it has been for more than 25 years) is sci-fi action fantasy. The movie blends all those elements for a fun ride to cap off the summer blockbuster season.
Well based on all of the reviews of this movie so far, I have to say that it appears that the actors and director seem to have duplicated the action figures perfectly. They are made of plastic and have no balls……………..Now let's all sing Kumbaya…………….Man do I miss John Wayne……………..
Think I'll stay home and watch "The Sands of Iwo Jima" or "The Longest Day" instead.
Lame. I NEEDS to be American! God, this movie could really kick heiny if it was done right. I love real-life GI Joes!
But hey, I'll netflix it for a laugh.
Hilarious! Do you remember Cobra Commander's voice from the old cartoon? WHAT A QUEEN! He probably wore the mask to hide his tranny makeup.
Why hasn't someone bought the rights to the book "House to House" and made a movie from it?
Tone the language so it'd be PG-13, shoot it on digital HD in NM for the tax breaks, and release in the Spring = huge money maker
Sounds like the John Hughes marathons so many of us have planned is the perfect way to not think anymore about this one.
As always, Mr. Nolte, thanks for biting the crap-ass bullets for us.
It's only suppose to be good, fun, popcorn movie. This is not the Deer Hunter ok?? Maybe you're too old to review this film, let us know what you think of "JULIE- JULIA" .
Because it would be done right. Which means it won't be done at all.
You could see the suckiness of this movie coming from so far away, watching it must have been like looking at the light from a distant star and knowing it's already millions of years old….
If they ever start giving out purple hearts for having to sit through bad movies, Nolte will have earned more than John Kerry!
The thing about the commercials for this non-American GI-JOE movie was that they've been using Kid Rock's American Bada$$…?? Talk about sending mixed signals.
Rambo II was cheesy, escapist, moronic silliness. The LAW in the helicopter being the final straw for me.
But you knew where the man stood.
Somebody, please! Get all the right-wingers together, put together a shoot-em-up of Government Issue Joes fresh off the plane from Half-a gas-can with a frighteningly huge budget, and KICK SOME A$$!! The FAC team from Transformers , some Michael Biehl, a cranky Stallone PO'd because he can't go, and the only politics are drum-marching, flag waving, in your face conservatism. End it with a pirated speech from John Wayne…
Pardon me. I have to go regain my composure.
I resent the whole idea. This sounds like total garbage, brought to us by people who take millions and turn it into garbage, kind of like their hero, the President. And if thats an Obama World, no wonder why it sucks dirty gutter water. No way will I have my memories of the cartoon and what the term GI Joe actually stands for be tarnished by some dip poo director, an ungrateful slob like Quaid and the metrosexuals in the film. Yeah you to Sienna Miller.
I've actually changed my mind based on the reviews and comments I've read here. That (me changing my mind) only happens about once a decade, so you've really accomplished something.
I won't be seeing this film. If it's an "Obama world" I want no part in it. Not even as an audience.
Wait, so you really expected a movie based on an old line of toys and an 80s cartoon to be a serious war movie ala "The Longest Day"?
All I need is for Cobra Commander to have a sweet high pitched voice and I am jacked up and good to go on this one.
Figures Dennis Quaid would be in it. John, after reading your review of G.I. D'oh! (sic), I can understand why the (once) great filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola has such distain for the way Hollywood makes movies these days.
So……no Kung-Fu Grip at all? Damn.
Love it, John, well said! Obama world: It cost too much, it doesn't deliver and we should all get our cash back for this clunker.
It's really a loss to cartoondom that Chris Latta, voice of Cobra Commander and Starscream, died in 1994.
The cartoon series was brilliant. The whole "The Viper is Coming" episode was pure genius.
Of course, I'm not nearly dorky enough to point out that the mask was to hide his disfigurement from an accident he suffered while working on an experiment as a scientist in Cobra-La.
And yes, it is amusing how they always jumped out 2 seconds before the missle hit.
And indeed “G.I. Joe” does remind of an Obama world: It cost too much, doesn’t deliver and we should all get back our cash for this clunker.
HA HA! Excellent line and so true.
My point was I prefer real, original movies. Movies like "GI Joe" are the reason I haven't seen a movie in the theaters since "Taken" — before that it was "The Passion of the Christ" and before that it was "We Were Soldiers". Hollywood sucks.
I just came back from this movie, and I have to say I liked it.
Some impressions, being not a film auteur and such but just a forty something guy who used to rush home from high school int he 1980's to watch GI Joe and Transformers.
1) Cobra…
This works. They are bad, evil people. Early on, they explain why and how and it is a lot more believable than it ever was on the TV show or in the comics. Somehow, they make them bad, evil and reprehensible all at once.
2) GI Joe…
I had visions of "Megaforce" (wikipedia that abortion of a movie, I ain't linking it), and it turned out to be anything but. GI Joe was believable as an international force. This is not the UN with bigger booms, but rather the essence of Heinlein's "Starship Troopers", which, if you recall, was another multinational force fighting bad people…err…things.
3) Action adn Plot…
I have to say, some of this was just out and out fun to watch. Nolte's comment about not understanding why MARS delivered the goods and then tried to steal it back is a really old plot device. I can recall it being used in one form or another in at least six movies off the top of my head. (Now, one thing that bugs me, as the Joes learn that MARS is behind all this, and it seems that "MARS" gets plastered on dang near everything out there with a pointy end, won't someone get just a teeny-tiny bit suspicious about it? Didn't they every hear of subsidiaries?)
About the action…it was awesome. It was like they got some ten year old boys, gave them a bunch of the licensed toys and took notes how they fought with them. The ninja's were ninja-ey, the soldiers blew stuff up real good and red shirts died in impressive ways (Sorry Covergirl…) There is some dodgey CGI effects, but none of it is filmed with Michael Bay's Shakey Cam with Added Lens Flare-y goodness ™. So…thanks to Mr Director.
As to the international flavor…i seem to remember the original TV show having a whole bunch of accents in the 'American" force. Gung-ho, Snow Job, Low Lite, Roadblock, Wild Bill, Shipwreck and Spirit all had accents. The rest of the Joes did seem to come from someplace in Kansas/Iowa though based on their midwest way of speaking.
This is a live action cartoon, and if you ever read the Larry Hama comics, this might be right up your alley. I honestly think this is a move for 7-14 year old boys and those that can remember being that age. Like the hot dogs on a bun, ice cream cones, long range marksmanship, and baseball, GI JOE was born in America, but the we are a kind people; we can share our bounty with the rest of the world
As to this being an Obama World movie…seriously, get a grip. This is not "Rendition" or "Lions for Lambs" or even 'The Hurt Locker"…this is make believe. OMG…it is Obama world! I take it back
John – I asked for it and you delivered. Thanks! I just have no interest beyond seeing how successful their "marketing strategy" turns out. Dang, as I get older, there seems to be less and less quality out there.
This is a live action cartoon, and if you ever read the Larry Hama comics, this might be right up your alley.
No, it won't. The film is basically the diametrical opposite of Larry Hama's comics in tone and stomps all over the iconic Snake Eyes/Scarlett romance. It's loud, it's dumb, it's disrespectful to the characters it purports to depict. Don't bother.
Great review. Actual reporting, critique, writing. Newspapers are dying because they lack actual writers. Loved "If it wasn’t for resentment I wouldn’t have felt anything." …although after reading MunDane, I might still go see it…
C:/AUTO-RESPONSE/RUN: Thank you for confirming [insert-opinion-I-already-formed-sight-unseen-eight-months-ago] I think I'll stay home and watch [insert-noteworthy-pre-1970-war-film].
I saw it, had a good time. If nothing else, when's the last time ANYONE went and made an "army men" movie so specifically aimed at 7 year-olds? It's plotted and executed like somebody transcribed a bunch of kids playing make-believe with action figures – in a good way.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escap...
The fact that you literally have to wait for the very last SHOT in the film for the bad guy plot to make sense is… problematic, yes. It's basically a late-60s James Bond movie… though a more relevant "tonal" comparison would be the 80s Flash Gordon remake – again, in a good way.
Romance is not something 10-year olds get. If the only thing you found objectionable was that they didn't have Scarlett and Snake Eyes get romantic…I got nothing for you. The TV show never had anything about Scarlett and Snake Eyes being anything more than comrades. (In fact, I seem to remember the only real 'romance' on the show was between Covergirl and Shipwreck.) No one died on the TV show either. But the movie is filled with dialogue and action right out of the comics.
And to respond to someone above, yes, the 'kung-fu grip' does make a singular appearance.
Well, I guess rather than this garbage I'll just have another viewing of Lee Marvin and Chuck Norris in Delta Force to get my G.I. Joe fix.
Baroness resembled her toy and Snake Eyes mostly did, but the remainder was changed from the toys not for any story reason but simply so that filmmakers could claim co-ownership of (unnecessary and impersonalized) new designs and thus limit Hasbro's profit share. How F'ing difficult would a simple white ninja costume have been for Storm Shadow instead of the Urban DJ Cowboy outfit they gave him?
Uh, news flash to liberal land:
You've got to be AMERICAN to be considered a G.I. Joe.
It's been that way since WWII, it was that way in 'nam, and it's still a standing rule.
I get it. He is saying 'it's an Obama world' to let us know early that he's not planning on making any 'evil' gross profit on the movie. Maybe he's hoping for a bailout when it tanks!
Humvee tires are self repairing. Still, I think I'll skip this even though it's clearly aimed at guys with eyeglasses and redhead fetishes. Of course these come from somewhere back in the toy and comic process. ("Emma Peel was so hot. Demure, tough woman in leather cat suit. Hmmmmm. Add wire-rimmed glasses." Whoever this guy was, let him direct the next movie.)
I might check this one out. The more I hear about it, the less enthusiastic I am. It's bad enough they kill my favorite character (Cover Girl, who never got much of a fair shake in the old mediums either) and screw up (or should I say completely ignore) the intricate romantic relationship between Scarlett and Snake Eyes, but the whole crapping on the American flag and injecting feel-good cumbuya BS is what really leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Transformers was big, dumb, loud, stupid, and obnoxious but it had heart. God help me, it had soul. An American soul. This GI Joe flick…well…at least I can enjoy the 'splosions I guess.
Screw Stephen Sommers and shoot the horse he came in on.
This movie suck, but that doesn't matter. It will do well at the domestic and international box office.
All marketing and no substance? Sounds like an Obama world to me. They can have it. I'll go back to watching The Dark Knight on Blu-ray.
And I'm shocked that a bunch of shrewdless leftwingers who have difficulty distinguishing good from evil in the real world also have difficulty making a movie about Americans fighting terrorists. Whodda thought?
I watched this movie last night. Was filled with nothing but 'decent' Visual Effects, Under-the-Top Acting, and NO PLOT. I agree with the OP- I am SO glad the 'American' Tag was not placed on this piece of garbage!
Making Movies based on Toys is a Bad Idea. Always. Bar None
Making Movies based on Toys is a Bad Idea. Now we can look forward to Battleship: The Movie!
…
No Joke
Uh, news flash to liberal land:
You've got to be AMERICAN to be considered a G.I. anything!
It's been that way since WWII, it was that way in 'nam, and it's still a standing rule.
I stopped consuming all such sickening Hollywood eye-candy; I realized was blubbering my mind and rotting my soul.
Being a Hollywood consumer is worst than being obesely obese, plus it makes the skin look awfully pimply, greasy and quite disgusting.
It hates America enough to be The Deer Hunter, just without the bother of plots, acting, emotion, etc. GI Joe sounds like it is for the mentality of those who chase sun reflections because they're shiny. Pass.
Bennierich, if avoiding a movie because its only redeeming element is lots of 'spolisions makes me "too old", call me Methuselah.
I don't apologize for loving Michael Bay or even "Transformers 2", John.
But at least I'm not going to sit through "GI Joe" like you did. hehehehe
…why are people comparing the movie based on a children's toy line and sebsequent cartoon from twenty-five years ago to real war movies?
Shouldn't the inclusion of multiple ninja have told you something?
Romance is not something 10-year olds get.
Heh… I don't believe I've encountered such resolute and profound ignorance for quite some time. I mean, where to begin, exactly, when nearly everything you've said is completely wrong?
Ah well, let's see… First of all, there's more to the G.I. Joe mythos than just the silly (but endearing) cartoons. You acknowledge this yourself, claiming that "the movie is filled with dialogue and action right out of the comics, but seem to forget when attempting to deligitimize the central Snake Eyes/Scarlett relationship by claiming that it wasn't in the cartoons.
Also, "Romance is not something 10-year olds get" is a memo that must have missed Larry Hama and the writers of the various cartoons, because romantic overtures and situations were occurring constantly.
Examples include Snake Eyes and Scarlett, Flint and Lady Jaye, Destro and the Baroness, Ripcord and his girlfriend Candi, Zarana and Cobra Commander (when the latter was being impersonated by a Crimson Guard) in the comics, and Duke and Scarlett, Flint and Lady Jaye, Destro and the Baroness (to the tune of dialogue like "come to my quarters, Baroness. I have some interesting new 'hand-to-hand combat moves' to show you"), and even Destro and Zarana for a while in the cartoons, and that's not even going into the minor romantic sub-plots, like Shipwreck's constant attempts in the cartoon to flirt with Lady Jaye (not Cover Girl as you wrongly remember), or episodes that focused on some woman one of the Joes had feelings for or cartoon Destro's tendency to shamelessly flirt with everything female and with a pulse.
Further, if "Romance is not something 10-year olds get", then why the Hell is Marlon Wayans' character making clumsy and obnoxious romantic overtures to Scarlett throughout this film? Even better, if the film, in your estimation, is not written with anyone other than ignorant and emotionally stunted ten-year-olds in mind, why does it reference the fuzz-headed, "Kung-Fu Grip" G.I. Joes of the 1970s, which would only be familiar to the now-middle-aged men who had them as children?
Good grief, man!
Crap dialogue, lousy acting, a plot that didn't make any sense, but lots of insane action. Similar to a lot of what Hollywood has been putting out this year.
I suppose Hasbro has every right to sell their copyright to anyone they want and that the buyer can do what they will with it. You would think that given the real-world track record of "elite international peacekeepng forces" the cinematic exploits of such a force would have little appeal but then what do I know. I'm showing my age but I gave up on all of the ultra-hip, slam-bang. CGI-on-steroids, over-the-top action epics a while back. I still have trouble taking movies based on comic books seriously so I know I will find a film based on a forty-year old toy to be preposterous. (I am now waiting for "Lincoln Logs – The Movie.") Think I'll spend a quiet afternoon drinking malt whisky and watching the exploits of international peacekeepers such as Trevor Howard and Bernard Lee as found in "The Third Man."
The Shipwreck/Covergirl romance happened when that Cobra created blob was threatening to wipe out New Jersey(?) Anyway, they killed it with apples (minute amounts of poison in the seeds, dontcha know…) The Scarlett/Ripcord romance is clumsy and right at the level of "Do you like me? Check one: ( ) Yes ( ) No" The Hama books were much more indepth because they had years to flesh out the characters. If they had gone by cartoon canon, then they would have had to involve Cobra-La, Serpantor and the Drednoks. Thank god they skipped that. The comic books were also get tangled and stretching all credulity, well before they were canceled (Brainwashing Spirit and Mutt…Fred VIII becoming Cobra commander…Billy…Stormshadow being an undercover goodguy…shall I go on?)
I like Micha Bay, just hated T2
This film was in no way very good — I thought it was barely passable as popcorn entertainment.
That being said, Nolte spent over a year trashing this pic — there was no way he was going to like any of it. So, here's my problems with this review:
1. A grudge against the French is not "Americanism". Sure, Chirac sided with Saddam and lied his butt off on the Security Council, and they did everything they could to undermine the process in Iraq, but many brave French fought alongside us in the cause of freedom.
2. It wasn't "inexplicable" that McMullen stole back the warheads. He was extorting money from the NATO — that's why he tried to make it look like their fault during the heist.
I thought that was pretty simple.
3. I felt there was a great sense of what the stakes were in the film. McMullen continually stated he wanted to destroy nations, and create a one-world government. That could be the "Obama" world of which Stephen Sommers spoke. They set this up from the VERY FIRST scene.
4. McMullen always planned to use the French scientist's facility to weaponize the warheads — THAT was the Baroness's arc. What's the big deal?
5. SnakeEyes DID try to shoot the Hummer's tires. He obviously hot them, but it didn't do anything. Come on, man … in a film with nanite killers, do you think it's impossible to have bullet-proof tires? My lord — even James Bond used those.
I will agree that the flashbacks only worked to kill the pic's momentum. And didn't think Wayans was nearly as annoying as he could've been (it seems like you wanted to play that Jar Jar card SOOO bad).
Overall, I thought this pic was a fun piece of summer fare.
Good call on the late '60s James Bond films. Sommers actually said he was going for Thunderball, which was evident in the final battle.
The Shipwreck/Covergirl romance happened when that Cobra created blob was threatening to wipe out New Jersey(?)
That puts it at about the same level of significance as the Shipwreck/Mara romance from Memories of Mara.
The Scarlett/Ripcord romance is clumsy and right at the level of "Do you like me? Check one: ( ) Yes ( ) No
That's what everyone says. Hell, G.I. Joe superfan and eternal glass-half-fuller Justin Bell of Generalsjoes.com is of the opinion that Nichols has more natural chemistry with Ray Park's masked, silent Snake Eyes, and I'm still trying to figure out why they'd do something so blatantly in contradiction of one of the source material's core relationships in the first place. Political correctness? UGO movieblogger Jordan Hoffman seems to think so (though he's of the opinion that this is a good thing for whatever reason).
The Hama books were much more indepth because they had years to flesh out the characters.
It's not just that. Hama's comics were just better thought-out in terms of characterization to begin with.
If they had gone by cartoon canon, then they would have had to involve Cobra-La, Serpantor and the Drednoks. Thank god they skipped that.
Quite frankly, a biker gang serving as a useful proxy for an international terrorist organization is far more plausible than most of the Rise of Cobra script, and as for Serpentor, the film's M.A.R.S./Cobra is pretty heavily into bioengineered soldiers in funny armour already, in case you didn't notice.
The comic books were also get tangled and stretching all credulity, well before they were canceled (Brainwashing Spirit and Mutt…Fred VIII becoming Cobra commander…Billy…Stormshadow being an undercover goodguy…shall I go on?)
Please do. Any of that would have made for a more tightly-scripted film than this… thing Stuart Beattie and his cohorts came up with.
I will agree that the flashbacks only worked to kill the pic's momentum. And didn't think Wayans was nearly as annoying as he could've been (it seems like you wanted to play that Jar Jar card SOOO bad).
All signs point to "Jar Jar" (clumsiness, jokey stupidity) with a hefty helping of "Mary Sue" (somehow able to work equipment he hasn't even seen before, let alone trained on, steals a previously existing character's previously established girlfriend).
John, as usual, nails it on the head. My own discontented review here calling out the Marxist multi-culti sensibilities of the film:
http://christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2009...
Sheesh. I think we have to take up a collection to buy a pillow for Nolte's sore butt, cotton for his sore ears and a lot of Excedrin for his sore head. Better yet, we need to buy him a really big bottle of Jack Daniels, a thick steak with baked potato, butter and sour cream from Ruth's Chris Steak House and a huge gift card to Amazon to pay him back for taking the bullet on this crappy film for us.
Mak, I notice you comment that "iIt’s an Obama world' is an explicitly racial statement and Sommers backs it up by casting an American black, an English black, an African black (Moroccan), and a masked man who conspicuously looks black as four of the six leads for the Joe team. Meanwhile, the white-haired, white President is shown in a plot twist to be a villain bent on world destruction."
In light of this, I'm wondering why you let pass without comment the fact that the film tries to set up the red-haired white female G.I. Joe, Scarlett, as the "love interest" of Marlon Wayans' character and vice-versa, when in the source materials the movie purports to be based on, she was romantically involved with a blond, white male character (Snake Eyes in the comics and Duke in the cartoons).
Just curious.
"Battleship: the Movie".
Actually, that would be pretty good. Two naval strike forces searching blind for each other out in the middle of the pacific? I'd watch it. Unless they changed the American fleet into a U.N. strike force…
Are you saying that it's a bad idea to watch a good movie instead of spending ten bucks to see a movie that most critics say is terrible? If you liked it, I'm glad you had a good time. But your snark makes no sense.
Templar, it is obvious to me, there is no way you wanted to like movie, no matter what it contained. So, enjoy your last word with me…you win at TEH INTERWEBZ!
"Are you saying that it's a bad idea to watch a good movie instead of spending ten bucks to see a movie that most critics say is terrible?"
I'm… pretty sure I was saying "boy, a lot of people sure do seem to be posting the exact same comment"…
"Thank you for confirming [insert-opinion-I-already-formed-sight-unseen-eight-months-ago] I think I'll stay home and watch [insert-noteworthy-pre-1970-war-film]."
"I'm… pretty sure I was saying 'boy, a lot of people sure do seem to be posting the exact same comment'…"
Yep, nothing in there but that. Sorry I misunderstood.
Templar, it is obvious to me, there is no way you wanted to like movie, no matter what it contained.
Oh please. I wanted to love the movie especially considering it was going to have two of my favourite things in it (Ray Park and powered armour). Sadly, it was not to be.
In which case it would still be an American fleet
.
Watched it. (Free) It was ok. Just barely. I wouldn't pay to see it.
Icebergs falling underwater? Who thought that up?
Mak. Seriously. "Meanwhile, the white-haired, white President is shown in a plot twist to be a villain bent on world destruction. It becomes clear to the viewer that the white-haired Bush is the inspiration for the war-mongering President and only a multicultural team like the Joes can counter the influence of the evil American."
You have GOT to be kidding me with this line in your review. Not only is it BLATANTLY off mark, anyone watching the movie *SPOILER ALERT! CLOSE YOUR EYES* could tell you that there wsa nothing wrong with the "White haired american president"! He ended up being replaced by an imposter played by Arnold Vosloo, setting up an obvious sequel! There was no intent to bash Bush. Hell, there was never a cross word said against "the white haired american president".
Look. I'm conservative. I stand for my ideals, but I am sick of the reviews coming from people anymore. EVERYTHING is scrutinized and reviewers are pulling out abstract reasoning *if you could even call it that* to try and paint films as being one way or the other. THIS WAS A MOVIE BASED ON A TOY! A TOY, PEOPLE! There was no grand meaning in the script! It was made to be simple popcorn fun, nothing more. Lots of explosions, beautiful women, and other staples of typical summer fare. I have never been so annoyed with reviewers as a whole. Was the movie corny? Yes. Was it a bit dumb in parts? yep. But was it entertainment and something you could watch and be impressed by enough to take your mind of things? ABSOLUTELY. That's the goal of summer movies like this. Not to send out politically coded messages.
Seriously guys. I hate to say it cuz we do stand on the same ground where ideals are concerned, but really. Get over it.
THIS WAS A MOVIE BASED ON A TOY! A TOY, PEOPLE!
And The Dark Knight was A MOVIE BASED ON A COMIC BOOK! A COMIC BOOK, PEOPLE!
Sheesh.
[...] as I pointed out at Big Hollywood, if the producers were so bent of “internationalizing” this movie by erasing its [...]
I would rather have someone use my mouth as a human toilet then to see such a disgrace of a movie. A black ripcord? Dark haired Duke? Base in a foreign country? Give me a bad break. Not even the title does justice to G.I. Joe, where is the American hero part? Hollywood makes me sick, I wish that i could vomit into this director's mouth. Another American icon, trashed by hollywood, and made into something different. Which means, probably a sequal to this garbage.
Has anyone read the New York Times review? It's amazing:
"The story here … follows the contemporary militaristic-movie template. Bad guys square off against good, amid heavy-metal machines, regularly timed explosions, conspicuously planted American flags….The main square-jawed hunk here is Duke…., a presumptive nod at John Wayne and his gung-ho, America-first values. The movie’s flag waving, however, is as purely pro forma as the destruction rained down on that epicenter of contemporary evil, Paris."
HUH!? Flag-waving? Pro forma Americanism? American flags?! I don't recall seeing one American reference besides the snarky Joseph Gordon-Levitt-delivered line about Duke, "This guy's a real American hero." That used to be a tag line!! Not a sarcastic punchline.
Read the review here: http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/08/08/movies/08cob...
[...] This film was marketed as if it could be a pro-American “hoorah” kind of action film. Watching this film, I kept forgetting it was GI Joe. Then, I remembered an angry feeling caming over me. How could they ruin GI Joe? John Nolte said it best, “If it wasn’t for resentment I wouldn’t have felt anything.” [...]
[...] Comedy) Red Skelton. A man has many adventures during the silent-film days. … 'GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra' ReviewIt was on AMC. Sure the program guide called it "The Dirty Dozen" but it was about [...]
The film had a lot of problems, not only bad acting, major story plot holes, and the suspension of belief in human nature. Basically the only reason someone joins Cobra is by being brain washed by nanites injected at the base of the skull. Add in that the characters only resemble their toy counter parts by the names they call each other and you have total fail in terms of movie making.
Ray Parks was the only person who portrayed his character well, but even then they couldn't leave Snake Eyes costume alone they had to add LIPS to his mask. That showed me that the director had no clue about the original characters and their back grounds.
Bottom line don't see this movie if you have ever even seen a picture of the original G.I.Joe.
Okay…had I been drinking coffee while reading this I would have nuked my monitor. Funny, I was just thinking about that the other day about the Ken dolls.
Well, I will be saving money this summer and adding this to the list of the movies I won't see. Sorry you had to endure the screening. Actually, the first two paragraphs of your review did it for me. I'm tired of giving money to people who think my views and values are moronic. I'll just withold a little capital from them.
I'll wait for the RiffTrax to come out, then rent it.
I'm betting on "American battleship captain goes rogue and has to be hunted down" ("Hunt For Red October" with a role-reversal), with "neo-Nazi pirates steal a battleship" as a runner-up alternative.
Because if recent movies have taught me anything, it's that We Are Our Own Worst Enemy. Well, that and There Is No Such Thing As Al-Qaeda.
"Right. Because we had so many of those."
Actually, we did. Just not ones where we were supposed to enjoy ourselves. Rather, we were expected to cry, rub our hands and gnash our teeth.
Live action versions of the toys? You mean all the guys in the undifferentiated, bulky, black suits? I don't remember the toys looking like that.
[...] the new film, GI Joe: Rise of Cobra, is a despicable excuse for a movie. It was harshly panned by Big Hollywood as well as by me. For an action film, it is horrible, but for an American film, it is a [...]
[...] about being shunned, speculation over whether or not Paramount was gaming Rotten Tomatoes, and general handwringing over the transformation of “A Real American Hero” to a bunch of international grunts. [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.