‘Heeb’: Brought to You By the Director of ‘Schindler’s List’
by John NolteAmerica’s long past being shocked by anything Roseanne Barr will do for even a smidgen of attention. Why just the other day I was sitting around thinking it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if she dressed as Hitler and made fun of the Holocaust. To be honest, though, it wasn’t much more surprising to find Steven Spielberg’s name attached to this:
“Domestic Goddess Hitler” eats a “Jew Cookie” fresh from the oven.
The director may have captured our cinematic imagination throughout most of the 70s and 80s, but the creator of “E.T.” has a dark, troubling side when it comes to personal politics. He is, after all, the Useful Idiot who had to be shamed out of putting a pretty face on one of the most oppressive governments in the history of mankind — he is, after all, the director of “Munich,” an exercise in moral equivalency and historical revisionism written by a screenwriter who, after claiming he wanted Israel to exist, said, “…the founding of the state of Israel was for the Jewish people an historical, moral, political calamity.”
Barr’s Jewish Cookies-In-The-Oven photo can be found in the latest issue of “Heeb” (which, if my third-grade, summer camp fat lip recalls correctly, is a slur), a publication ”backed financially by Steven Spielberg“. In fact, there might not have been a “Heeb” without him:
The magazine was criticized for such a controversial name mostly because The Joshua Venture, a non-profit group backed by Steven Spielberg, granted them $60,000 to start up a business.
Somehow it gets worse. Spielberg’s prodigy refuse to limit the hate to their own (something that used to be called “unacceptable prejudice”). In 2004, the magazine took a vicious swing at Christians with a photo spread depicting Christ and the Virgin Mary in such unspeakable ways the Anti-Defamation League felt compelled to speak out [emphasis added]:
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today expressed outrage at a shocking parody in the winter 2004 issue of Heeb Magazine that plays on the recent controversy surrounding Mel Gibson’s film “The Passion of the Christ.” Among other destructive images, the magazine’s “Crimes of Passion” photo display portrays Jesus as a sex object with his genitalia wrapped in a Jewish prayer shawl. The Virgin Mary is shown as a seductress with exposed breasts and body piercings.
“Heeb Magazine’s irresponsible attempt at parody is deeply offensive and blasphemous to both Christians and Jews,” said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. ”There is a point when parody crosses the line into tastelessness. With this issue, Heeb not only crosses that boundary but engages in highly destructive anti-Christian themes that are both insensitive and ill-timed.”
To avoid honest work, somewhere along the line the lazy and untalented got away with calling “shocking” and “offensive” art, and this is where we find ourselves today.
The benefit, I guess, is an honest look at the Palace Guards of our culture. When the mask slips, our Spielbergs are a pretty ugly bunch.
Debbie Schlussel, who brought this to my attention, has more.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
154 Comments
Well, 40% of the Democratic Party Blames the Jews for our problems so…
Barr, like many others of her ilk are Jewish by racial heritage…
Little or no Jewish spirituality, or even basic Old Testament understanding courses through the veins of this repulsive secular slovenly creature. All this does is make ordinary Jews (and Christians as well) more convinced in their respective faiths… actually a pretty good advertisement for attending services, don't you think?
i was shocked when i saw this the first time and it doesn't lose one iota of its offensiveness upon further inspection. those who think this is art are the same folks who blame bush for the ills of the world. they are lost. lost and blinded by their self-appointed greatness.
I think the appropriate comment is "well, consider the source." Maybe she's having another nervous bust-loose. But Spielberg keep that abomination afloat comes as a bit of a sad surprise to me. He is terribly naive, and desperate to turning everything into a moral equivalence. But this is something in a whole different category.
I think the appropriate comment is "well, consider the source." Maybe she's having another nervous bust-loose. But Spielberg keeping that abomination afloat comes as a bit of a sad surprise to me. He is terribly naive, and desperate to turning everything into a moral equivalence. But this is something in a whole different category.
I think the appropriate comment is "well, consider the source." Maybe she's having another nervous bust-loose. But Spielberg keeping that abomination afloat comes as a bit of a sad surprise to me. He is terribly naive, and desperate to turn everything into a moral equivalence. But this is something in a whole different category.
There is one thing, that I cannot get my HEAD around….. A jewish Director and a jewish actress making fun of the HOLOCAUST… and this is FUNNY???
The ugliest and most unfunny woman ever, ….uh….Barr none.
A jew director and a jew actress and they find this to be funny? I gather making fun of the holocaust by JEWS are OK?? if there was a german director and a german actress making this movie there would be WW3
I just couldn't get my head around how a person could make 'Schindler's List' – and still hug Castro? Then it hit me – this guy's nuts. No wonder he can't see anything wrong with "Jew cookies".
LawHawkSF – in order to equivocate morality – wouldn't you first have to know what it was? I wouldn't call that naive, I would call it amoral. That's the only explanation for how the same person who makes 'Schindler's List' also hugs Castro.
[...] original post here: ‘Heeb’: Brought to You By the Director of ‘Schindler’s List’ AKPC_IDS += “68443,”;Popularity: unranked [?] Comments [0]Digg [...]
*sees picture*
*splashes head with Brain Bleach*
This is the same Steven Spielberg who called his meeting with Fidel Castro, "The eight most important hours of my life."
I cannot help but admire Spielberg's filmmaking skills, but I think there is something warped and twisted in a man who can at once make Schindler's List, the definitive film about tyranny and oppression and then become schoolboy giddy over a another evil, oppressive tyrant like Fidel Castro.
What is this obsession Hollywood libs have for tyrants, terrorists, oppressors, Communists and Fascists? If Spielberg were a Cuban filmmaker who did not produce films supporting the Fidel philosophy, he would be the first in line to a Cuban reeducation prison along with the rest of the Fidel/Che sycophants in Hollywood.
Spielberg used to make brilliant films. He turned a corner somewhere…I think around the time he made "Munich" but possibly before that, since he chose to make "Munich" in the first place.
Now I find him unwatchable. It's a shame, really.
She has to be one of the 10 most untalented, unattractive people who have ever snuck by to become stars in the history of Hollywood.
Okay, she's even in top 5.
If you see Roseann now, it's not even a good show. She can't act. The show is not in the least bit funny. She's carried by her supporting players (which was probably not even her idea, so she does not even get the credit for that).
Just a vile, ugly person. Period.
Madonna decides to become a jew, or something, to resusitate her dead career, now this. A few years ago these show biz folk could go on Love Boat, but now the web is Theater of the Absurd.
Smooth career move.
I defend both their write to publish this and my right to demonstrably scorn it.
I defend both their right to publish this and my right to demonstrably scorn it.
Will Spielberg and tother Jews in the entertainemnt industry say anything about this> , Will he continue to fund Heeb? I am a Christian and this vile woman makes me sick. I now realise what great taste I had when years ago I watched a couple of episodes of her TV show and loathed her and it.
Spielberg has decided he prefers the company of the Far Left and Hollywood bigots, and must feel he needs to 'balance' "Schindler's List' with 'Munich' and now this POS.
He has become blind to the very things which allowed the gas chambers and concentration camps to be built. All for the sake of looking important and powerful in Hollywood.
Obama's science czar supports eugenics like many Leftists. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, too) In fact, Leftists are so much like Hitler, sometimes i think these are cases of methinks thou protest too much.
http://www.popmodal.com/video/2994/Glenn-Beck-on-...
I think it's neither. I think it's like a 'supermorality', fueled by fame, money and belief in his own press. It's pushed him passed a moral tipping point, into a confused state of his own making.
Rosie looks cute with the 'stache.
I would like to go on record as saying that Spielberg has made some of the best scenes in Hollywood history: openings of Jaws and Raiders, RR crossing encounter in Close Encounters, storming the beaches in Ryan. But! I have never once completely enjoyed one of his films. There is always something in them that is PC, corny, illogical (like the last 30 minutes of Raiders), etc.
As for Barr…
Try using the word b*y, as in young male, Tom.
That one stopped me from several posts here the other day till I tracked it down during a hissy fit.
Not Over.
This makes as much sense as Jews who support the same political party as the openly anti-Semitic Kos Kids.
Apparently for Steven ideology trumps pride. Very telling.
Ah, thanks for admitting Jews are a race. Always funny to watch apologists like you try to juggle that. We shouldn't be supporting a racist nation like Israel, then.
They think it is hilarious that anyone believes it. Laugh all the way to the bank (which they also own.)
Indeed, Whites are under a yoke while Jews are free to do what they please (and with our tax dollars). If you are in doubt of who is in control, ask who you can't *question.*
No, don't go Old Tom. I always enjoy your comments.
Jack – you mean you lasted through a second episode?
He is far from alone in that. "ideology" trumps pride" could be found under the definition of Hollywood liberal. Well said!
Boom
Without the context, Rosie looks like she's ready for the men in white coats to come running. Actually, she looks like that WITH the context- either way, she's ready for a rubber room. Never could and never will be able to stand that woman.
A simple fact is Liberals Hate Christians.
Christianity is a competing philosophy and faith that beats liberalism so it has to be beat. Where did it come from? A Jewish man claiming He was the Son of God. You know liberals hate Judaism as much as they hate Christianity, but hey just have to be sneaky about it. Call for the destruction of Israel because their "big meanies" who are only being targeted for extinction by about 1 billion muslims and other lefties.
tl;dr if libs hate Christians, they surely hate Jews. Roseanne is not a surprise except in the stupidity aspect. But then again, maybe she feels safe bringing out her real beliefs in a democrat presidency.
Exactly!!
Let's all remember the fact that these people in hollywood use the term "jew" very, very loosely. They all like to call themselves Jewish, however there's an enormous world of difference between the real jewish people and these ones…I still can't understand how jewish people mostly vote democrat, though.
If Roseanne and other HNollywood liberals really think something like that gets laughs, maybe she can try dressing up like Bull Connor and serve a black-faced Janeanne Garafalo fried chicken and watermellon.
Strange how so many Eastern European Jewish Democrats have come to embody the world view of Josef Mengele, a fugitive Nazi in Roman Catholic South America who made his living as a freelance abortion doctor and who, like Supreme Jewess Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had a soft spot for Eugenics (some people are just unworthy sub-humans, eh Ms. Ginsburg??).
I recall that Kapos were Jewish Concentration Camp prisoners who helped the Nazis dispose of their fellow Jews in order to save themselves.
I hereby award the 1st annual American Kapo Award for lifetime achievement to Spielberg, who beats out a crowded field of worthy candidates like Barbra Streisand, George Soros, Rosanne, Rahm Emmanuel, Haim Saban, Herb & Marion Sandler, Steven Bing, Marc Rich and Sen. Charles Schumer)
What I find strange about this whole thing is the total lack of outrage outside of a few conservative blogs.
Now to be fair, Spielberg created some foundation as a tax break to ostensibly promote Jewish culture or something, and some moron at the foundation doled out the bucks to some guy who claims he's going to create a hip irreverent mag for young Jews. He didn't quite pick up the phone, call "Heeb" magazine, and order them to put together the most tasteless and disgusting spread they could come up with. Should he be embarrassed this happened? Sure. But what could he do? His foundation probably made a one-time only grant to start up the mag, which has been around for a few years.
(For the record, I absolutely loathed every second of "Munich.")
That said, EVERYBODY should be condemning this piece of crap. This is the equivalent of Essence deciding to put a photo spread of black men getting lynched for "laughs." Don Imus lost his job over stuff far less worse than this and at least gentile Mel Gibson was drunk when he was muttering about Jews. But to make light of the worst catastrophe to happen to your own people? WTF?? I lived in Miami for several years. I had classmates who lost their grandparents, aunts, uncles, and other relatives in the Holocaust. Have the Jewish people failed to educate the Gen Y crowd about recent history?
If so, it would explain a LOT.
She wanted attention. She got it, cheap and easy.
Now people are talking about Rosanne Barr again. She doesn't care why, just as long as they're talking.
"When the photographer suggests that we pose together for a quick snapshot, I put my arm around this slightly eccentric drinker and pot smoker who gets off on dressing like a Nazi, and it dawns on me: I adore her"
there's just nothing to be said…this is just lunacy.
There was a movie in the 90s…Event Horizon, a minor SciFi flick, but it had an image that has stayed with me…the ship was in orbit around Neptune (or Uranus) and it became entangled with a black hole (or something like that), and the crew went mad…the rescue ship that came, saw the images of the mad crew lost in the hell of the madness, and they had to fight their way out before they too fell beyond the event horizon into the madness…more and more these days I feel like that rescue crew.
It's sad that Roseanne has become so neglectful in her personal grooming habits. That upper lip is a mess.
Suprise, this had nothing to do with Spielberg just like Rosenne's actions had nothing to do with comedy.
Clerarly the AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE IS TOO DESPERATE FOR EXTRA CLICKS to actually tell the trurth. Just because Spielberg made a financial contribution to this magazine doesn't mean he gets to approve every article published. I am sure he has better things to do.
John Nolte, you are a liar, idiot and a moron. You are also a terrible human being hope I hope will get what's coming to him. First of all, Spielberg wasn't shamed into anything. How dare you accuse a man who did more for humanity than your entire generation tree of being shamed into not accepting a position offered to him by the Chinese WHEN HE NEVER EVEN signed the contract. How dare you make light of a man who one one of the fewt to actually speak out. Mia Farrow's comments had nothing to do with it, and I dare you to prove me otherwise. He has his own brain and you clearly do not. I recommend you actually look into the backlash he still has in China before opening your mouth about Mia Farrow.
He is a great man and a genius filmmaker.
As for Munich, you sir do not have the mental capacity to understand what the movie was actually about.
Tony Kushner and Eric Roth have delivered a screenplay of increadible wisom and power and no matter how long idiots like yourself can try to reduce it to a movie about moral equivalency it remains the complete opposite. Just watch it before writing lies about it.
And spare us your comments about Holocaust. You are neither in a position nor don't possess the brain to comment on it.
Burn in hell, b*tch.
tell that to my murdered great grandmother and her daughter.
I cannot believe that someone could so shameless and desperate as too drag an honorable man's name through the mudd just so his pathetic website would get extra revenue. This has nothing to do with Spielberg and you are one hell of a loser to even bring up his name in the first place. John, if I saw you in person I'd punch you in the face. People like yourself are the reason real publications are failing. Instead of checking your facts your exxagerate and write one sided
Spielberg has started and contributed millions of dollars to numerous foundation and charities. Everything from Hurricane Katrina Relief and Healthcare Organizations to Survivors of the Shoah and Righteous Person's Foundations. He DOESN'T DO s**t you occuse him of.
That's end of that story.
All that said Roseanne's piece doesn't make a good statement and in no way is intended to be humorous. Risque maybe, perhaps even satirical but not in bad taste. If people actually calmed their anger they may actually inderstand.
indeed, she actually trimmed that day to make it smaller and less bushy.
thankfully my Rabbi is not one of them… He's a gun totin conservative with a CCW
I've been saying this for years.
Shakalaka
I am so glad we DONT have to see that parts that dont show. How in the world did Tom Arnold ever survive that?
They may think otherwise, but make no mistake, God is not mocked.
Spielberg was a great film maker…he isn't any more. Things change.
I'm with you Tom. I rarely stop by this site anymore because of the censorship. Several times i have tried to post a comment that I spent quite a bit of time writing just to have it denied because it apparently got some censor's panties in a wad? Ooops, can I say panty here? Can I say wad?
oh…and I censored myself a moment ago…before you post, correct your grammar and spelling and try to make your message seem to be a coherent and literate statement, as if you might have made something of an attempt to get through the rather easy educational that we have these days. Though, in your defense, maybe the aluminum foil gets in the way when you're typing.
dang…educational system…left out the word system…hoist on my own petard…oh the ignominy!
Proman and Kadabr should check their comments for spelling and grammar. The Holocaust was real and the atrocities were real. It does not surprise me that there are people such as yourselves that would not just believe that it did not happen but that it was justified, you are the true nightmares in this world. What is more, your very posts bring to point that if Spielberg has people like you defending him, John's writings are probably correct. Oh, and if you see me and want to punch me, be warned, that this is one woman who will defend herself, which is something you are probably not accustomed to in the female gender. I explain this to you, since you referred to John as a b*tch, John is a guy – not a gal.
Just a DUMB women and her anticks just SOLIDIFY that!!!
People, it's an automated system. They have certain words flagged just to make sure. If your comment doesn't make it on at first, GIVE IT SOME TIME. It will eventually show up if there's nothing outrageously offensive about it. I see no reason to take it personally. And, yes, I've been moderated here before. Never did figure out what word triggered it, but hey, it happens. Get over it; I did.
Apparently, ideology trumps the biological imperative to survival.
This isn't "moral equivalency".
It's amoral equivalency. That is, nothing is sacred. Nothing deserves respect. There are no boundaries whatsoever. I can see it in Roseanne's eyes: "Am I shocking all of you little narrow-minded people? Aren't I naughty and avante-garde?"
What I don't see in Roseanne's eyes is the illumination of a soul.
<edit>
I'm not familiar with "Heeb" magazine, but from the quick study I just did on the internet, it appears to be what you get when you take judaism and subtract out a belief in God.
OK…here's another comment of mine "in moderation". I am so freaking tired of this site censorship I'm about ready to stop coming here.
I can't use the term "J*daism" in response to an article about "Heeb Magazine"?
Rosanne. Is that you?
Why are all my posts deleted?
Can we expect any less from the Hollywood leftist malcontents? There isn't anything they can do or say that will ever surprise me. If this was any other time, Barr would be working in a diner of some interstate. Stevie boy's only connection to movies would be in a movie theater working as an usher. He could never run with Ford, Curtiz, Walsh, Huston, and if these people had the resources that Stevearino had one can only imagine where they would be in their age or even our age. The one thing is certain that the old masters would never attack their country or be part of anything that has had this complete lack of respect for all those innocent people who were murdered in the Holocaust. If Stevie has nothing to do with Barr or this magazine, he should come out and condemn them , but he won't.
The last good movie Spielberg direct4ed was Saving Private Ryan. He should just quit working at this point. And we liberals can say what they want about Coulter or Beck, but they have Barr, Garafalo, and Maher on their side. We win. Easy.
And here's the best line from the article…."As we wrap up the shoot, Barr puts her Swastika armband, one of the gingerbread victims and a Polaroid of herself in the costume in a Ziploc bag, making it look like evidence from some bizarre crime scene. She plans on bringing it to her 13-year-old son when she picks him up from school. “Maybe this will make my kid like me,” she says with a sigh." Yeah, the kids will really like her.
The one thing that liberals do not have, and I think it's genetic, is shame. Nothing shames them at all. They prey at the alter of controlling government and will stop at nothing to get there.
I also think this magazine is dispicable…but here's something to consider next time you watch "Saving Private Ryan."
Basically, the film is book-ended by scenes of the elderly Private Ryan at the cemetary.
However, the way Spielberg segues from the opening scene of the elderly Private Ryan at the cemetary, to WW2, is via the use of a FLASHBACK.
…BUT since Private Ryan was not 'present' for most of all of that action, it therefore cannot be presented as a flashback thru the eyes of Private Ryan—he wasn't there !
That's a pretty amazing flaw by the director whom is supposed to be the master of the language of film.
Legendary screenwriter William Goldman first made this point in a stinging essay for Premiere magazine, just prior to the Oscars in March 1999 (when the film was up for several Oscars).
Uh, Nolte DID watch the film. May I suggest you do the same before trashing another person's opinion.
And btw, the correct grammar is 'nor do you possess', not 'don't possess'. Also there should be a period after 'and power', followed by 'And, no matter long…' Also wisom is spelled 'wisdom'. I'm not trying to show off, dear. I merely wish to exhibit my mental capacity which you favor so much.
Rosie – biting off the head of Nolte is going to be a tad more difficult than snacking on that little cookie of yours. I wouldn't suggest you try it – unless you have really good insurance and a person who can drive you to work for the next 6 months. (Body casts are so awkward on public transportation.) May I instead suggest your channel your rage into a more productive avenue? Spell check, for one thing, and a really long session with your 7th grade English teacher. And, oh, a few fistfuls of Valium with that beer.
(Hmm, my post disappeared so I'll try again.) I'd rethink that 'punch in the face' dare to Nolte. It's nowhere near as easy as snapping the head off a "Jew" cookie. Please be warned – should you try to treat Nolte like the cookie, you had best (a) have really good insurance, and (b) have a buddy who will drive you to work for the next 6 months. (Body casts are so awkward on public transportation.) May I suggest you channel your anger in a more productive way? Spell check and a really intense session with your 7th grade English teacher. And, oh, you know a few Valiums with that beer.
Can we say ATTENTION who*re? She has nothing left to attract anybody to her so she has to result to lowlife tactics.
So this is what the bottom looks like? It's worse then I thought. This is a sign of how empty the liberal controled media has become. They still exist in their 60s fantasy world were they're taking it to the Man by breaking all the rules and shocking us. Problem is they did the job too well, nothing is shocking anymore and they come off morons who pat themselves on the back on how dangerous they are when all they've done is just come off as lame and stupid.
forever learning, but never gaining wisdom….or how about…barren trees, twice dead …plucked up by their roots. Oh, but they woudn't get that…they might have to read the torah or the bible. I say this with the weight of similar judgment pending against me at the the final judgment, these two are fools.
I agree with your assessment Suzie1 as far as the Super-morality aspect fueled by the things you mentioned. It's the confused part I'm not sure of. I think he's to Arrogant to Prideful to be confused. Pride Proceeds the Fall as they say in the Good Book. Well… We'll all find out together.
That's next week
Proman
Why don't you provide a link to what you are talking about?
Since Notle has provided a links to back up what he says I am leaning toward believing him over you.
And by the way I think Speilberg had some clue as to th type of articles the magazine would print based upon the name so I am not with you there either.
Yes let me calm my anger………
Hitler was reincarnated as an obnoxious Jewish Commedian who doesn't believe in God. Speilberg had absolutely no idea of what kind of articles would be put in a magazine called "Heeb". Yes be calm, think logically.
Sorry man I still don't understand. Could you pahleeze rephase it for us Right wing hicks from North Florida country. Ya'll know we's a little slow down hir
I have a bone to pick with these "people" insisting its the "J's" who killed Christ. Read your Bible morons it was the Romans who killed him plain and simple.
Now as an Italian I will admit that we are not proud of this fact but among us Da go's who gets credit for a hit is important.
So remember it was the Romans (Pontious Pilate) who killed Christ and if anyone says different we break their legs. It'sa mafia thing you would not understand.
I'm Saddened to say that to Many Far-Left Mover and Shakers of the Hebraic Persuasion Amazingly it seems, haven't learned all that Much from the Last Century. Well….We'll see what this Century holds in store for Them. So far I don't like what I'm Seeing. I wish them Luck. Something Tells me, Maybe… It's History, Their Going to Need It.
"Munich" was a lie from beginning to end. Note what they don´t tell you, for example, the fact that the massacre was not a bolt out of the blue but only the latest in an ongoing and highly successful terror campaign. I know my history and that context wasn´t missing by accident.
And putting the massacre itself at the end of the movie after we have been bludgeoned with gory scenes of jewish "revenge" against nice elderly gentlemen (is there another kind of arab terrorist?) intentionally turns everything on its head. Spielberg is one of the best directors, technically, but he is a coweard and definitely not an intellectual. Whether he is a Jew I am not sure.
I think there is a misunderstanding about who is jewish. I´m no expert on Judaism but it is a religion, right? An Irishman or Chinese could become a Jew if he believed in it. The racial definition was used by the Nazis. No matter if your grandparents had converted to Protestantism, according to the racial definiton you were nevertheless a Jew or "Half Jew" or "Quarter Jew". Now, if I reject the definition based on blood, then most "Jews" in Hollywood are probably not jewish in any meaningful sense of the word even if they think they do. What do you think?
I think "Dagos" are Spanish, not Italian, but your point is taken.
Ahhh. The Sons of Judea Packing Heat .My kind of Rabbi's. It's Lox and Bagels for Breakfast Sunday Morning. I just love mixing Cultures . Just another reason Why I Love America Pal.
How much were you paid to come here and post your nonsense and fake outrage?
The problem with what you're saying is, being filtered out by the automated "censor" removes your comment from the immediacy of the debate. Four hours later, nobody is going to come back here to see what "Old Tom" may have said.
Yeah, I know it's nothing personal. But impersonal, automated censorship is still censorship. And filtering out words which are, without context, simply grey-neutral (I'm not talking about the "N" word, or the "F" word) is stupid censorship.
Thanks for the kind words. I really would just like to hear something from the site mods…
Believes what? The holocaust? You can't possibly be serious.
Tell that to my friend whose unit was the first to the gate at Buchenwald and fed the survivors out of his own pack.
Freaking imbecile.
And by the way, my comment has been "in moderation" for 14 hours now.
LOL.
He had to suffer for his art. The last woman I saw him with his arm around was a lingerie model, so I guess he's been able to purge the demons by now.
God in Heaven. Where's the site "moderator" when you need him?
Understand what, exactly? Why don't you explain these sophisticated artistic nuances that none of us are smart enough to see for ourselves?
Just alluding to the unsubstantiated fact that they exist is pretty lazy writing on your part.
I'll go you one further and say we all killed Christ. Our sins that is.
Well, gee, uhhh, what were your posts about?
I was griping about having lost ONE of my posts to the dreaded "site censor" (see above), but if all of them were gone I think I'd have to take it personally.
BTW – How much do I hate having to type that with an "*" so that my thoughts don't wind up in the site admin's dead letter office?
He's paid his dues and now he reaps the rewards. God bless America!
Probably to show how "secular" they are – not like the pushy American people who believe in the Torah (can't say the J-word or the Site Nazi gets me for some reason) or the "aggressive, oppressive" Israelis who keep beating up on those poor little Palestinians who only want to kill them.
I disagree that Spielberg is a good director. He's too UNSUBTLE to be a good director. "Schindler's List" was good because of Neeson and the story, not because of Spielberg. Any other director probably would have done it just as well or better and wouldn't have felt the need to make his point with a sledge hammer. So far as "ET", I was rooting for the Feds to gut that insufferable little reptile. And while they were at it, Drew Barrymore, too. "Indiana Jones" (I know this is heresy but…) stretched belief to the point of boredom. "Close Encounters"? Who knew what that was about except about 3 hours long. "Jaws" would have been better had he not used a plastic shark. Other than "The Color Purple", I can't think of a Spielberg film that wasn't just plain dumb. Bankrolling this hideous magazine fits.
comedians today are so dumbed down, they are just not funny.. jon stuart, letterman, roseanne, leno, janeane whoever. all the overpaid dopes, .. stupid stuff, not funny like robin williams, or other smart sharp educated comedians, but stupid . playing to uneducated dumbed down idiots! i and everyone i know has no time to even talk to or listen to liberal imbeciles. i cant talk to liberals anymore as they never engage in the conversation at hand. it's either "YOU'RE RACIST" or "Thats Offensive".
example :
Me: "we're planning on fixing up a bathroom"
Liberal: thats so racist! trying to be better than someone else. i'm totally offended.!
You must be logged in to post a comment.