‘Funny People’ Review
by John NolteNever in a million years did I think Judd Apatow was capable of making something as sharp and penetrating as “Funny People.” Never. Since the director first started dabbling in film, I’ve been a harsh critic of everything he’s touched, labeling it as over-rated, overlong, self-indulgent and as forgettable as last week’s “National Enquirer.” Well, past is the past. “Funny People” is proof that this was a director working towards something, earning his chops and feeling his way to bigger things. And it was worth the wait. “Funny People” is kinda brilliant — an insightful, touching and intelligent dramedy… James L. Brooks at his best but with a whole lot of dick jokes.
Adam Sandler is George Simmons, a comedian/movie star as wealthy and popular as Sandler, but having turned his back on his family and cheated on his one true love, Laura (Leslie Mann), he’s now left with only “show-biz friends,” which means he has no friends at all. In-between making films like “Merman” (”Splash” with a guy mermaid) and private-jetting to corporate standup gigs that pay $300k, this desolate 40 year-old haunts a Malibu mansion and looks to fill his emptiness with willing groupies and everything money can buy.
After being diagnosed with a rare form of Leukemia, George is given an 8% chance of survival and put on experimental medicines that only seem to quicken his deterioration. He has no one, so he tells no one, but for some element of human contact he returns to his roots in the L.A. comedy clubs. This is where George meets Ira (Seth Rogen), a struggling comedian much better at writing jokes than delivering them. Needing a joke writer, an assistant, and even a friend, George hires Ira to be all three and a fascinating, complicated and unpredictable relationship is born.
The film’s first half takes us into the ultra-competitive world of show business and standup comedy, using Ira and his two roommates as a microcosm. The three of them are close but always simmering just below the surface is a fierce rivalry. Mark (Jason Schwartzman) is a sitcom star who leaves his $25,000 paychecks lying around, Leo (Jonah Hill) is just starting to make money as a performer, but Ira’s relegated to grabbing open mic nights and working full time behind the deli counter of a grocery store. Apatow obviously understands this world very well because the relationships feel 100% authentic, especially the tensions that never leave these three, even in the best of times.
The narrative takes an abrupt turn in the second half, way outside the world of Hollywood and into suburban family life, when George re-enters Laura’s life. Though it’s been twelve years and Laura’s now married with two daughters, imminent death stirs up old feelings between them and George decides he wants her back. Because her Australian husband (Eric Bana) is unfaithful, George proceeds under the assumption all’s fair. But things aren’t as black and white as he thought, and this includes his own feelings.
Apatow’s genius is how effortlessly he pulls two completely different worlds into one cohesive film without breaking the spell. You have to credit the director’s skills as a screenwriter, but the whole show is the single and separate emotional journeys of George and Ira, and both actors playing those roles deliver revelatory, career-high performances.
Sandler’s always shown promise as a dramatic actor; the problem has been the films themselves. Even more than the under-appreciated “Punch Drunk Love,” ”Funny People” gives Sandler a showcase any serious actor would kill for and boy does he deliver. George is alternately pathetic, cruel, charming and despairing, and Sandler hits each note perfectly. Never once do you catch him acting. Never once does he stoop to pathos. Rogen, an actor I’ve never warmed to until now, is just as good. Finally he shakes off the cold hostility that’s undermined everything he’s done thus far and delivers an accessible, average guy (though driven) worth rooting for. Leslie Mann (Apatow’s wife) is, as always, fetching and compelling.
At 146 minutes, the pacing is certainly deliberate and measured, but the butt never numbed and I was sorry when it ended. The language is crude. Everyone’s obsessed with sex, especially the male member, but unlike Apatow’s other films these moments don’t feel look-at-this-iconic-moment forced. The world’s so perfectly realized that, coming from these characters, the “dick” stuff is more charming than off-putting and feels as natural as breathing.
Without giving anything away, what’s most impressive about this terrific film is how difficult and troubled George’s journey is. When he remembers he’s dying, he really is a changed man. When he forgets, the closed, self-involved “star” quickly returns. This is why the film, length and all, works so damn well. From moment to moment, you never know (especially in the second half) which George you’re dealing with. It’s a perfect thread of emotional tension that tightens until the very last scene, which, for my money, is one of subtlest, sweetest and best of the year.
I was wrong about Apatow, I was wrong about Rogen, and when it comes to movies I love being this kind of wrong.







Subscribe via RSS
48 Comments
Mr. Nolte, it takes a very fair-minded person to write a review in this manner. Thanks for being intellectually honest. This is one reason why you've become my most trusted reviewer.
Must say that I was going to avoid this film like the plague until this review. Now I might give it a chance. My problem with Adam Sandler films is that he is always playing Adam Sandler. His character is one that can only exist in movies. In real life someone would have, well, kicked the crap out of him long ago. If Jude Apatow is showing signs of growing up then I am all for it.
I knew I wanted to see this when Sandler looks at his German doc and says. "Are you mad that you died at the end of Die Hard." Absolute perfection.
I never got the thing with Leslie Mann. Now, Sarah Shahi ("Life") on the other hand …
I might go see this one. Thanks Mr. Nolte/DH.
Mr. Nolte I've been at odds with most of the reviews you've filed lately, but in a non-biased way, I think I have to see this one now.
Sounds interesting.
But does it have the excessive male nudity that has become de rigueur in Apatow affiliated comedies?
Cause I'm really tired of seeing hairy fat butts and little floppies on the big screen…
I think all those Happy Gilmore type movies do show the same guy over and over but I remember being really impressed with him in Spanglish. I'm glad to see him in a new way.
It sounds like dick scenes are to the aughts what tit scenes were to the seventies. Ya just can't be "cutting edge" without one, regardless of how pointless it may be. I first spotted this in the movie Vanishing Point (the original) where the girl rides up on a motorcycle and proceeds to serve absolutely no purpose except to be topless.
Wow. I wasn't driven t see this movie, but now… I am. IT'S ON YOUR HEAD, NOLTE!!!
It better be good..or else. mwah-ah-ah-ahhhhh
[...] original here: ‘Funny People’ Review This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
The movie basically sucks. It is boredom interrupted with a lot of good jokes, but at 2.5 hours people in the audience were talking and not really being entertained. Overall, it is eminently forgettable. Maybe a good first date movie if your're trying to score. If you have to see it, see it at a cheap matinee so you won't feel that rooked. This is no 40 Year old virgin or Knocked up.
Yep, nothing like a dick joke to make for some truly classic cinema: Citizen Dick, Gone with the Dick, The Dickfather. Gotta love it.
I always liked Punch Drunk Love probably because it wasn't the typical "Sandler" movie at the time.
Sounds great , just not funny. I'll rent it, eventually.
Sandler was good in *Spanglish*, but the movie itself wasn't very good.
Me too…
I only made it about half an hour into Punch-Drunk Love, which is also about how far I got with Magnolia. I think I'm allergic to Paul Thomas Anderson.
If you've blasted everything Apatow has touched, or though he was incapable of being this sharp and poignant at the same time, then you have never seen "Freaks and Geeks."
When I first saw the trailer for this movie my thoughts were "I think this is the first Judd Apatow movie I want to see". Your review has confirmed that impression. I still most likely only rent it – as my schedule severely limits the number of movies I see in the theater.
I think Magnolia was doomed since it had Tom Cruise acting like a man-whore…only so far your acting skills can take you.
Like many folks' comments, you've turned me around on this one, John. I'll keep the fingers crossed the "Merman" joke's just an "in-passing" moment. The only footage anyone needs to see of an "actual" merman is in Zoolander (that's a strange compliment to Ben Stiller, too).
I'm sorry, but Freak and Geeks was depressing like 70% of the time. For every happy or funny moment on that show there were 3 or 4 miserable ones…and that was all packed into the 1 season it was on.
Not trying to argue, but you illustrate Mr. Nolte's point perfectly, which is that this isn't typical Apatow. Some people, like Mr. Nolte, respond really well to it, however if you're fan of Apatow's other movies then it probably isn't all that appealing.
That is the same reason I also avoid Sandler films. His best was indeed "punch drunk love" cause it was "un-sandler" Both that and this film proves that Sandler is a very good actor and isn't just that slapstick shtick guy.
I wish Will Ferrell could learn a lesson from this.
I never said it was Mary Poppins. I said it was sharp and poignant.
John – your honesty and integrity are what make me trust your reviews blindly. That being said – while I admire what you've just written, I still am not going to see this film. Two reasons. The trailer sucks and gives me nothing that I would want to see this film for. Second – the audiences don't like it. That last reason really nails it for me. Honestly, the dropping numbers of audience attendance is a HUGE factor to me. They just can't be wrong. When I saw them drop like a cement block to the bottom of the pond the second week of "Half Blood Prince", I knew the film was bad. Now that I've seen HBP, I have to say the audience is right. HB sucks! And – since the audience numbers are saying the same thing about this film, I'm going to trust them. But thanks anyway.
See, that's where they went wrong…Dick van Dyke makes everything funny!
I saw it yesterday, and I loved it and was nicely surprised by the really good acting performances of the main characters.
If you have been married for more than 10 years, and have kids, and are yourself in your early 40's, you will get this movie. Eric Bana's character delivered some beautiful lines and deep introspective at the end of the lawn fight scene.
George Simmon's discussing divorce with the oldest daughter was quite powerful, and truthful.
Leslie Mann on the couch when she meets George again after 12 years is a moving scene.
I loved it – but I can relate to these characters. Perhaps that's the key to enjoying it?
Oh, and it is very funny.
The rapidly-dropping attendance may be the result of Apatow type-casting himself, so to speak.
The teen and twenty-somethings who loved "Knocked Up", "Forty-year Old Virgin", "Superbad", etc. probably flocked to the opening of this film, expecting more of the same. I've not seen "Funny People", but according to Nolte it is a dramatic (no pun intended) departure from Apatow's usual fare. I suspect a lot of the "Knocked Up" fans were turned off by what they saw, spread the word, and voila–rapidly-dropping attendance.
Meanwhile, people like Nolte who were not in to Apatow's standard films probably assume "Funny People" is just more of the same, and do not bother attending a film they (understandably) think will not appeal to them.
Are you kidding? Do people talk like they did in the movie in real life? Are people outside of my sphere complete and utter creeps? Do "friends" actually speak like that to one another? How is it possible to like any of the character except the put-upon doctor?
The dialog was cringe worthy. Eminem's cameo was embarrassing, nasty, and confusing and Michael Medved calls it hilarious???
This movie could have been something, had they not smothered it completely in pathetic jokes and filthy dialog. They filled it with people I would never have as friends and hope to never have as acquaintances.
I have to ask again, do people really talk like this? If so, then I see why shallow, pretending, amoral reality shows are all the rage. Sad.
Not high school. It was a drama, not a sitcom.
NBC's biggest crime was cancelling 'Life'.
A movie filled with penis jokes and or male nudity is what makes "film classics" nowadays and men seem to love it. Hey, but in todays world show or present a bare woman's backside or a breast and its considered vulgar by the same critics and audiences. Makes one wonder if this world isn't turning GAY or has already.
You call that powerful and truthful? He says, "how does that make you feel?" and "maybe they should be apart."
I call that manipulative and selfish.
"If you have been married for more than 10 years, and have kids, and are yourself in your early 40's, you will get this movie."
I'm all of those. Do you talk the way the aussie guy did in front of your children? "We're just fucking around." Those kids were about 10 and 8. Real classy. You must have a charming household. The wife screws around with the Simmons while her kids are in the main house…again, as you said, "beautiful and deep."
"His best was indeed 'punch drunk love' cause it was 'un-sandler'"
I'd say it was less-than-Sandler, but not un-Sandler. By that I mean they picked a couple of his strengths to play to, and chucked the annoying ones. They made him a responsible small business owner instead of a goofy loafer. He was mild-mannered instead of an obnoxious loud-mouth.
Yet they amped up the freak-out stuff he does well, and the innocent-guy stuff he sometimes does well.
Wait, how can you possibly say a film's dropped in the first weekend? I realize it can drop from Friday to Sunday, but that shouldn't really be any indication of word-of-mouth or anything. It's not enough time. The usual test is what happens from the first to the second week, or at least after the weekend.
Besides, it seems "Funny People" didn't do whammo business on Friday, anyway. If you start out with only 8 million, what does it matter if you drop?
John,
I have great respect for and trust of your reviews. I just got back from the theater after seeing a Saturday matinee of "Funny People." About half-way through I leaned over to my wife and whispered, “I’m LOVING this movie.” Then the plot shifts to George’s attempt to win back the love of his life. And it wasn’t soon thereafter that I started to feel that the movie was getting overly long. And that’s a big problem.
Apatow should have cut at least 20 minutes from this 2.5-hour film. Editing this film down to a reasonable length would have greatly improved the experience of the audience, but would have involved cutting screen time from his wife and children. No can do.
The stand-up scenes, the interplay between Rogen, Jonah Hill, Jason Schwartzman and Aubrey Plaza were great. Comedy gold. The movie needed more of that — especially more Jonah Hill! — and less of the Leslie Mann and Adam Sandler plotline.
I'm glad you recommended the film, John. And that you've come around about Apatow movies. But for you to fault his previous efforts for being too long, and not do so about this one? That leaves be puzzled. If any movie should have been a tight, sub-2-hour movie, this was it.
you have easily become my go-to-guy for movie reviews… anyone big enough to admit when he is wrong, especially a critic, is human and deserves my attention. Thanks John, and I did enjoy the film.
You Hollywood types will laugh at anything. Adam Sandler? Are you kidding me? The biggest comic con-man since Jim Carrey. Does anyone in L.A. have an original idea?
'Do "friends" actually speak like that to one another?'
I can completely understand this criticism. If you feel their attitudes were unrealistic, all I can say is that I envy you.
The people I was friends with in high school, I stayed friends with for another ten years, seeing them nearly every day – even though, for seven of those years, I had lost all respect for them. Does this make me a particularly craven individual? Probably. But it means I recognize something in the attitudes the roommates have for each other – just barely not breaking the relationship, even though they're not really sure why the relationship is even valuable any more.
I was a fan before of all involved unlike you, but do agree with your review of the movie. It was very good.
-Martay
Nolte, this is your best review of the year! Great movie!
J.R. Holbrook, Actor and Host of the Sundance Film Festival needs to be in Judd Apatow's next movie!! He is hilarious!! JR was also amazing harassing Samantha Brown on her own Sundance Show for the Travel Channel! He is a real gem! Watch him at http://www.festivalafterdark.blogspot.com or http://www.johnrobertholbrook.com
I agree!! JR Holbrook is captivating….and very funny!! I also heard that Robert Redford, Bill Clinton and Princess Diana's boys wear his cologne John Robert Holbrook – Pharoah….WOW
watch it online
http://megashare.info/watch.php?id=TWpNeQ
I ABSOLUTELY agree. this movie was one of the worst I've ever seen. I can't believe critics are calling it intelligent or memorable…i almost walked out of the theatre, as others did. It's funny how people are also referring to it as a serious drama with a meaningful and well-thought out plot. The movie was a jumble of different ideas that ended in a bad soap opera. Seriously, am I the only one who gets that?
The *HOT* John Robert Holbrook poster of his male model laying face down on a couch (naked) wearing only the Holbrook socks is a masterpiece! I received this poster during the 2009 Sundance Film Festival and now I need more of them for gifts. Does anyone know where the John Robert Holbrook Posters are sold? I was told Prints Plus and allposters.com but they are out. HELP!
i really loved this movie. one of my favorite only because the comedians playing in the movie are all my favs.
You must be logged in to post a comment.