Review: ‘Whatever Works’
by John NolteWoody Allen’s told his share of dark stories. “Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989) and “Match Point” (2005) immediately come to mind. Both are remarkable films that delve into the auteur’s well-traveled theme of what morality means in a world he sees as godless and pointlessly random. In each, the protagonist plots and carries out a cold-blooded murder. Neither is caught or punished. In fact, both prosper. Without condoning the behavior, Allen expertly uses the dramatic extreme of murder to illustrate his belief that we live in a world where if you can get past the law and over your own conscience, it’s all relative. And you need not agree to find this idea fascinating.
With “Whatever Works,” a deeply unpleasant, unfunny “comedy” starring Larry David, Allen takes a disturbing stride towards condoning this form of nihilism. We’re far beyond “The Heart Wants What It Wants,” the memorable theme explored so tenderly in Allen’s 1986 masterpiece “Hannah and Her Sisters.” In that film there were at least very real and human consequences to infidelity and other selfish, romantic pursuits. No more. “Whatever Works” might as well be titled “Whatever Works Works.”
David plays Boris Yellnikoof, a misanthrope’s misanthrope and relentless Leftist elitist incapable of humanity or kindness. In a series of unfunny monologues, Boris breaks the third fourth wall, acknowledges those of us in the audience and spews the same philosophy on the worthlessness of life that recently drove him out a window in a failed suicide attempt. To anyone within earshot, he’s an insistent ranter sure he’s the only one who’s figured it out because the rest of us worthless insects are embalmed with pop culture and religion.
The former academic who was once “almost nominated for the Nobel Prize” lives in a decrepit walk up and teaches chess to kids (actually he hurls insults at them) in order to meet the monthly nut. One night, on his way home, he finds a teenage waif at the bottom of his stairs, Melodie St. Ann Celestine (Evan Rachel Wood), a runaway from Mississippi. Before you can say “Why Does Woody Always Bore Us With This Troubling Obsession of His,” the sixty-year old Boris marries teen-aged Melodie.
But “Whatever Works” is only getting started. Melodie’s estranged mother and father — uptight, God-fearing Redstaters played by Ed Begley Jr. and Patricia Clarkson – are the next to arrive and fall under the spell of a Bohemian Manhattan. Before long, Allen’s ham-handed stereotypes give up the Jesus talk and silly country values for the promise of happiness found in divorce, ménage a trios and the long-repressed, inner homosexual.
Allen’s writing is shockingly lazy. The dialogue plays like something from a high school play with every on-the-nose scene stiffly performed as if over-rehearsed. The characters are worse; paper thin. Other than Rachel Wood, who summons more depth than the script deserves, the usually terrific Clarkson and Begley Jr. seem satisfied playing caricatures, which should come as no surprise. Hollywood bigots, never shy about granting terrorists, Nazis, rapists and child molesters some level of depth and dimension, refuse anything of the kind for us Wal-Mart shopping, Jesus-lovers.
With mixed results, the 74-year old Allen has used stand-ins before but David’s the worst — yes even worse than Kenneth Branagh. At least Branagh’s a talented film actor who brings something to the table above the script. Allen himself brings an unspoken pathos to these characters, even the narcissist in “Stardust Memories” and rank bastard in “Deconstructing Harry.” David only proves he’s a television actor, a sitcom guy, whose sitcom schtick never parts its own waters long enough to allow us a glimpse of the human being beneath Boris’s bile.
Not only is “Whatever Works” Allen’s worst film by a long shot, it’s an unrelentingly ugly thing that allows for a horrible, cruel and selfish man’s philosophy to win the day. In the past, even in Allen’s godless world, a consequence of some kind was meted out to these types, or at least a rotting of the soul was implied. But the man who did more than anyone to lampoon his own kind, those he famously described as the “New York, Jewish, Left-Wing, Liberal, Intellectual, Central Park West, Brandeis University, Socialist summer camps, and the father with the Ben Shahn drawings” crowd, appears to be devolving into something that lacks the self-awareness that once made him so unique.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
170 Comments
I think the last Allen film that I really liked, and one of the few that I've watched more than once is Love and Death. Allen should have stuck to making funny comedies.
His batting average since Bullest Over Broadway would not get him promoted out of the minor leagues, but he has more brilliant films than just about anybody. Granted, it helps that he makes a film a year, but still… no small thing.
I was worried about this one as soon as I saw Larry David starring in it. Not a good sign. No way can that guy carry a film.
Poor Woody. He should just do stand up.
[...] Originally posted here: Review: ‘Whatever Works’ [...]
I've pretty much given up on Allen these days, but he made enough gems in his prime to let me just ignore him in his dotage. Radio Days, Annie Hall and Crimes and Misdemeanors more than make up for the crap he churns out now.
Woody Allen (whose real name is Allen Stewart Konigsberg) is the typical liberal American Jew. He condemns Israel for defendng itself and mocks others who take religion and faith seriously. He used to be funny but now he's pretty much a shriveled old man who's too sad to be funny.
This sounds like a man seeing the end of his life and is trying to convince us and himself that he was right. The last thing I liked by him was Manhattan Murder Mystery which seemed a return to his early stuff when he cared more about being funny.
What about Scoop? That was about three years ago, and it's a hilarious film.
Vicky Cristina Barcelona was absolutely worthless (with the narrator revealing everything on the screen and the characters saying what they were thinking, I had no reason to look at the screen– except for when Penelope Cruz was up there), but at least it was just vapid and not "unrelentingly ugly," as you say here.
John, you are greater than Ebert himself. I just wish one tenth of the critical community had your moral clarity when they review bilge like this.
I agree. I liked his earlier, funnier stuff much better. Sometimes the person who grows old develops a more positive outlook on life, sometimes they don't.
Also, a note: if the character speaks to the audience, they're breaking the fourth wall. I think the third wall is the one behind them.
The problem with nihilism is that it's ultimately boring. If nothing matters, then why should we care?
I have to believe that George Carlin was originally supposed to play the lead. Otherwise it seems like Allen ripped of his whole schtick.
Its not so much the nihilism its the idea that everyone is racist and backwards except him.
"Oh, and ChristinaVickiBarcelona movie (or whatever it is) is him under another name doing his insufferable "art." He hide his name on the credits and stuff now."
Uhh… his name WAS in the credits, both sets. He just wasn't IN the movie himself.
Sorry, but… I'm just racking my brain trying to figure out how anyone comes to be aware of that particular movie and not also know that it's a Woody Allen movie. Did you throw a dart in a Blockbuster?
Larry David is hilarious. And Wal-Mart shoppers deserve no sympathy
Yeah, all those poor families trying to stretch a dollar – bastards. If only they could all shop at Nordie's with you and your rich leftist friends.
Something you didn't mention, and probably one reason contributing to why this is such a bad film, is that this is a very old script. Apparently Allen used it b/c he couldn't for some reason write a new one during the Hollywood strike.
But that said, Allen has been off-form for years now. The last film he made of any actual merit was "Crimes and Misdemeanors", and maybe one or two of his comedies since then have had a chuckle or three.
I knew there was a reason I haven't seen a Woody Allen movie in about 30 years.
In every American movie I've seen over the last 10 years, someone vomits, never because they have a hangover or food poisoning. In real life I can't remember anyone throwing up for purely emotional reasons. Is it possible that Hollywood is subconsciously trying to tell us that what they are doing to our civilization is sickening?
What a brilliant avalanche of wit and insight!
Thank you!!
Larry Davis is as funny as a cold toilet seat. And twice as cringe inducing.
Match Point – Bullets Over Broadway – Manhattan Murder Mystery – Husbands and Wives – Crimes and Misdemeanors – Another Woman – September – Radio Days – Hannah and Her Sisters – The Purple Rose of Cairo – Broadway Danny Rose – Manhattan – Annie Hall – Love and Death – Sleeper – Bananas –
I count 16 REALLY good films. Including 3 of my all-time favorites (Husbands and Wives, Crimes and Misdemeanors, and Manhattan). That is a genuinely remarkable track record. That's better than Billy Wilder, one of my idols (Who also made some unwatchable films.)
No question in my mind that is genius level accomplishments.
But damn, he sure is creepy in his old age. And his hit-to-miss ration has PLUMMETED the last 15 years.
I don't care how good a actor Ed Begely Jr. is. No freaking way he can play a convincing conservative!
I, as a overweight 40 year old male, have a better chance playing Mae West.
[...] post: Review: ‘Whatever Works’ This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
You forgot Sweet N Lowdown.
You forgot Sweet and Lowdown.
It's the new sight gag that has replaced the crotch kick.
That's the problem I've always had with Nihilists. If you don't care, then why did you even get out of bed? Why are you even exerting the energy to tell me about Nihilism?
Don't care much for Larry David or Woody Allen much anymore, although I must admit, I did like Match Point (which seemed so un-Woody like.) I probably didn't need this review to know to miss this one, but thanks for confirming it.
“Hannah and Her Sisters" was the last Allen film I truly enjoyed. But it's his very early comedy films that I've always had a special love for–"Take the Money and Run," "Sleeper," "Bananas," and even "Annie Hall." On the other hand, ever since he decided he wanted to be America's Ingmar Bergman, his record of accomplishment has been much more spotty.
Seriously, this guy is off my list.
Oh, and ChristinaVickiBarcelona movie (or whatever it is) is him under another name doing his insufferable "art." He hides his name on the credits and stuff now.
Larry David has never seemed funny to me. Obviously, I just don't "get him", but I don't think I want to.
Oh, sorry, I also meant to say — this movie just sounds awful!! If it's even half as bad as the review, who on earth is going to pay money to see it? Movies are supposed to entertain, not make our eyes and ears hurt.
"In every American movie I've seen over the last 10 years, someone vomits"
Certainly the audience is doing its fair share of hurling.
Let me recap most of his films: People in big cities(mainly in the borough known as Manhattan)are smarter and more sophisticated than people not in big cities. Their problems are greater and are more involved than people not in big cities. People in big cities feel religion is a "crutch" and phony. Relationships are harder in big cities and very, very complicated unlike relationships outside big cities.
People in big cities are more diverse just like all the the black characters in Mr. Allen's films. What? Oh, that's right. There are hardly any black characters in Mr. Allen's films. Skip that one.
Look, nobody is forcing you people to live in those big cities, mainly Manhattan(yet). If you don't like what's there, get the Hell out. You get no sympathy from me.
fIVE'LL GET YOU TEN THAT EBERT GIVES THIS MOVIE RAVE REVIEWS, IN FACT I DONT THINK HIS BOSSES TELL HIM TO LOVE ALL THE MOVIES ANYMORE, HE JUST DOES IT REFLEXIVELY,
Don't you realize that Walmart is the only place you can buy food, bullets, bait, diapers, software, tires,absolut, and a passable camembert at with one stop ?
Oh, but then you've probably never been inside a Walmart. Well trying asking for .22 LR at Trader Joes. And I bet they don't have nightcrawlers or beef cheeks and oxtails.
Snobby leftist.
I had a feeling VickyCristinaBarcelona or whatever it's called was going to be garbage, mainly because Roger Friedman (back when he was still polluting FoxNews) constantly raved about it. Well, "constantly" meaning within the 5 minutes a day he didn't attack religion or complain about Tom Cruise.
Go back under your bridge, troll.
I totally agree with you. My sister in law loves Larry David, however she seems to be just as snarky and cynical as he is, so maybe it takes that kind of person to understand his comedy. I don't know, to me it's a waste of energy being like that.
If I had the power, I'd say, "Look Woody, I'm the one funding your next movie. It's going to be a Western. Deal with it."
I'm sorry, a lot of the films people are including as "greats" here are pathetic. After Manhattan, the pattern was literally six mediocre films for one really good one (like a Hannah & Her Sisters) and then the percentages got even worse.
They say comedy's a young man's game. I suppose it depends on the old man. For some reason, Allen seems to have been ashamed to continue the legacy of idols like Groucho.
Ah the early funny ones!
Good review, I think I'll avoid this one. But I see a lot of Woody bashing (heh) here, and I think that people are losing perspective: Sure, his record hasn't been the greatest in the past 10 years, but who cares! The man is a genius filmer. The majority of his films are total gold worth watching again and again, particularly his early stuff.
Now, one major point from this write-up that I have to protest: Ed Begely Jr. is a good actor? Since when? He brings nothing to his characters. He is Mr. Bland. I'll give him Transylvania 6-5000, but not much else.
I really liked his HBO show. I think people like it because it is the closest thing to Seinfeld you can get anymore. If you didn't like Seinfeld, you won't like Curb or Larry himself.
The heart cry of an aging nihilist.
Larry David and Even Rachel Wood? Seriously? That's whole new levels of ickiness. Even more so considering the tabloid train-wreck that is Wood's well-chronicled personal life. Why the hell did David agree to do this film? Why is Allen considered good or great?
Not a single one of his films has entertained me. Not one. They're boring. I'd rather watch say, "C.H.U.D." or the worst Chuck Norris revenge flick. Heck the American Ninja series were more entertaining than the best Allen flicks.
Seriously, why is this guy considered "prestige" and why do people line up to be in his movies? [David was hilarious writing Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm lampooning the constant status seeking of the Yuppie elite.]
I was fairly stunned when I attended a screening of this film. I've seen my share up sub par Allen films, but nothing prepared me for the morally bankrupt theme of this film — made even worse by a script that felt like a novice's first draft. This once great auteur has fallen into an abyss that he may be unable to climb out of. Sad……
Hmm, you know, I have never thought a Woody Allen comedy was funny in the first place, or inciteful. I have no idea why he is he critics' darling.
It sounds like from the review that Boris quickly moves from nihilism to exstentialism. The barren nothingness of nihilism led Boris to despair and then to jump from the window. When suicide failed he then embraced existentialism as a philosophy. Existentialism is the philosophical attempt to give meaning to the emptiness of nihilism. It agrees with the nihilist that there are no universal truths but then goes on to exalt the individual and his quest for meaning and pleasure. Our culture has slowly embraced this philosophy since the 1940s and now slogans like "If it feels good, do it!" have moved it into the mainstream. All the characters in the film eventually embrace this philosophy and seek their own hedonistic pleasure by abandoning all standards except those they set for themselves. The existential characters define their own truth and what gives meaning to their own lives. They reject universal standards in favor of "what works" for them. In essence they become their own gods because they define truth and meaning. Welcome to paganism.
Great review!
"a glimpse of the human being beneath Boris’s bile"
(Actually, aliteration is always amazingly annoying.)
I saw Scarlett and Penelope and threw the dart. Got home and we played it and I kept leaving the room. My husband said it was pretty much stupid and reported to me that it was a Woody Allen movie.
Soooooo, yep, I'm an idiot. But didn't he kind of count on me to do that?
edit: oh, hi, movie Bob, didn't "see" you there at first….
So they can whine about something : )
You are so current Woody Allen and as funny as a case of the Gout.
In order to get Larry David , he would have to be contagious.
Re: Whiny old fool : )
Totally Agree!!
I never fail to laugh at Love and Death, Bananas, Play it Again, Sam, or Take the Money and Run, and Manhattan is still one of my all-time favorite films, but Woody's recent work is really depressing.
And if he's writing himself, he has to play himself. Larry David always has a harsh edge.
Finally, a review I agree with!
Free El Gordo!
I just finished reading a really interesting book by a guy that worked with Woody Allen for eighteen years. If you want to know what it is like working on a film set, check it out. The Big Picture. Filmmaking Lessons from a life on the set by Tom Reilly or go to his web site http://www.tomreillyauthor.com Read the second chapter on the Language of the set or the last chapter on Lunch. Really fun read.
Allen had a good run between Annie Hall and Radio Days. Beyond that, the wisdom of Sick Boy applies:
Sick Boy: "Well, at one time, you've got it, and then you lose it, and it's gone forever. All walks of life: George Best, for example. Had it, lost it. Or David Bowie, or Lou Reed…
Renton: Some of his solo stuff's not bad.
Sick Boy: No, it's not bad, but it's not great either. And in your heart you kind of know that although it sounds all right, it's actually just shite.
(….)
Renton: Right. So we all get old and then we can't hack it anymore. Is that it?
Sick Boy: Yeah.
Renton: That's your theory?
Sick Boy: Yeah. Beautifully f***ing illustrated.
Tobias Funke: "Are you calling me a coward?"
Warden: "I've only called one man coward—Brian Doyle Murray. No. What I'm calling you is a television actor."
(Arrested Development)
"Match Point" is one of the most morally bankrupt films I have ever seen. What made it truly horrifying was the brilliance of its parts; the direction, the script, the acting, all of that was top-notch. And yet, not a single character displayed any kind of moral code except what they could get away with. I did not care about any of these characters in any way.
What struck me about the film was that there was no moral structure imposed on it by its creators. I believe they did this deliberately, so that the viewer could decide whether they agreed with the characters' actions or not. No judgments were made on any of those actions within the film. Frankly, this disgusted me. I saw how Hollywood refuses to make moral judgments in even the most heinous of situations. I cannot imagine the emptiness of the souls involved in such a failure of humanity.
Saw this yesterday. First time I've laughed out loud throughout a (contemporary) Woody Allen movie. Which isn't to say it's some kind of game-changing masterpiece – like MOST of Woody's work, it's basically a sitcom with more sophisticated references, not necessarily a sophisticated narrative. Take almost ANY Woody comedy and swap out the name-dropping references to golden age movies, pre-1970s social philosophers and the New York art scene with 80s pop-cultural ephemera and you've got an episode of "Family Guy." Also, while well-executed and played, the "twist" with Begley Jr. is a worn cliche you can see coming a mile away (incidentally… is there any kind of general opinion her as to "In & Out," one of the great underrated comedies of the 90s?)
(continued)
(continued)
As to the film's "moral" (though that presupposes that Allen is 100% sincere here, which I somewhat doubt) is it worth asking why – since a MASSIVE amount of American film output since at least "Sunrise" has traded in the ancient cliches of "The City" as a wholly-corrupting force versus small-town/rural purity (even "liberal" films tend to be about 'the folks' versus 'big city corporate guys' or something) – it should be so offensive for ONE film to turn that notion on it's head?
SPOILER WARNING
So… based on this, am I gather that you require a movie to TELL YOU that an amoral multiple-murderer is the bad guy? Just asking…
FWIW, I kinda thought that the film tipped it's moral "hand" when it shows the villian in question in the midst of what appeared to be a remorseful dream being 'haunted' by his victims and called-out on his awfulness… only to reveal that it's actually the "thats how he did it!" realization-dream of another wholly-sympathetic character. In other words, this is the movie telling us "see? he's not even capable of feeling BAD about this!" and thus removing any trace of sympathy we might've had for him. But, that's just my interpretation.
The last Woody Allen movie that I could even sit through was Radio Days. I long for the days of Sleeper and Everything You Wanted To Know About Sex But Was Afraid To Ask.
Touche dragonash! Oh the one exception: Brokeback Mountain: where the only non-city relationships that are complex and searing happen between gay people. And let's not forget: Allen's such an enlightened non-racist, proven by his casting of a very dark skinned black woman to play the prostitute in "Deconstructing Harry." I believe in the text he praised her Lewinsky skills; that and her offering him a free one were her greatest character depths. Really what this movie is is him living out yet another fantasy (and disturbing thread throughout his career) of his ugly, shriveled self getting down and dirty with nubile teenagers. Billy Crystal in "City Slickers:" "Ed, have you noticed that the older you get, the younger your girlfriends get? Soon you'll be dating sperm!" Nasty old fart.
Gee MovieBob likes a film about an elistist that is much smarter then the rubes around him. Go figure.
Whatever Works, which is supposed to be the lead character’s mantra. Although the title is perhaps more appropriate as Allen’s methodology concerning filmmaking than as a life philosophy.
Read my review at http://cfilmc.wordpress.com/
For me this movie was all about making fun of caricature and stereotypes. The liberal godless one comes off as the worst one of them all. And who couldn't see the plot unfolding. I think Allen's message was this: a different form of live and let live. David sees when Melodie starts to adopt his pessimistic view on life, that she needed to move on. Notice how he didn't sing after washing his hands once Melodie left him. For all his supposed genius David could notice that 1) Melodie wasn't right for him, 2) love is fleeting and 3) people don't flush toilets. What did Melodie notice? That maybe people weren't evil they were just scared.
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Kitesurf News…
[...]the time to check out sites we have linked to underneath the[...]…
Kite Updates…
[...]we like to help out other sites, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[...]…
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Visitor recommendations trackback…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article is some of the best available [...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Gems from the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Blogs you should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.