Comments on: Review: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian

By: just dance 2

just dance 2 — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:21:25 +0000

Recommeneded websites…

[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……

By: garment sales worldwide

garment sales worldwide — Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:20:47 +0000

Read was interesting, stay in touch……

[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……

By: Mike

Mike — Sun, 31 May 2009 23:41:27 +0000

My wife and kids really enjoyed this but i thought it was an absolutely dreadful movie. yes the effects were great, but the characters were irritating and the whole movie was just a dreadful bore from start to end.

By: Redhawke

Redhawke — Tue, 26 May 2009 19:29:22 +0000

As early as December 2007, the release date was set for Summer 2009, so the only person that statement couldn't have been about was GWB. What's more, I tend to doubt that that line was the first filmed, so there was opportunity to change it depending on the outcome of the election.

That said, unless the date is mentioned in the movie, I'm willing to presume that the studio was referring to some President in the near future/alternate timeline, that's supposed to be "right about now," but not actually right now. FWIW.

By: Eduardo

Eduardo — Tue, 26 May 2009 00:17:51 +0000

I took my family on Friday and we all ( from 8yrs to 46) enjoyed it as did the audience judging by the laughter. Sure somethngs could be improved, but I had fun.

Any scene with Amy Adams was delightful, we saw her recently in "Sunshine Cleaning", what a great range.

By: amateisgal

amateisgal — Sun, 24 May 2009 23:38:02 +0000

As a writer, I noticed several plot holes, but I tried to ignore them. As a historian…well, let's not go there.

I took my daughter to the movie along with three of her friends (all 9 years old) and they loved it. Lots of action and laughter and silly characters saying silly things.

I liked it as just a fun film to watch – but if you start going into the deeper aspects of it, well, the allure fades.

By: saltypundit

saltypundit — Sun, 24 May 2009 23:18:49 +0000

I didn't think the movie was that bad. I liked it despite its plot holes. It made me, my family and most of the audience laugh, and some even clapped at the end of it. If you view it as just light, fun entertainment, and don't take it too seriously, it's fine.

By: Stephen Macklin

Stephen Macklin — Sun, 24 May 2009 13:27:55 +0000

Aside from the typical Hollywood loser dad, because aren't we all, I thought the first one was fun – as did my children. I have no doubt that the primary purpose for this film is just to animate a bunch of museum exhibits. The rest, however thin, is just a contextual excuse for the CGi guys to have fun. That said,the whole premise taps into an interesting fantasy and when I take my kids to see it I am certain they will enjoy it – without helmets.

By: GavinS

GavinS — Sun, 24 May 2009 06:50:26 +0000

Yeah, I agree… No plot, they were struggling to fill more than an hour… Kids like it, but hey, their kids… I was bored out of my wits…

By: BenBoychuk

BenBoychuk — Sun, 24 May 2009 06:09:53 +0000

If they starting filming in 2007, they must have assumed John Edwards would win. Well, maybe in some alternate universe. In any case, assume they were being subversive and meant Bush.

Too bad the movie is terrible. Not that the first was any great shakes. But at least Mickey Rooney was in it.