Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine
by John Nolte“X-Men Origins: Wolverine” passes the all-important summer movie “Soylent Green Test.” What do we ask of our cinema gods from May to September? The same thing Edward G. Robinson’s Sol Roth wanted at the end of his life, nothing taxing, nothing challenging – just a pleasant, easy on the eyes diversion from our punishing everyday reality. It’s summer dammit, and the living’s s’posed to be easy. A celluloid fine line must be walked between insuring we’re never bored and not forcing us to think. And so, just like the melodic, faraway *ting* of a baseball hit off an aluminum bat, “Wolverine” hits that summer sweet spot.
Unlike “The Dark Knight,” which used allegory and theme to richen its story and characters, the first two X-Men movies (haven’t seen 3) were unduly burdened by political subtext. At no time did either achieve the most important moment in a superhero film – at no time did they soar. It’s not hard to figure out why. How do you accomplish lift-off weighed down by a blinding nuance which won’t allow an all-out rumble between good and evil? “Wolverine” never soars either, but it’s not a superhero film, it’s a genre flick; a satisfying, old-fashioned revenger, a B-movie whose characters just happen to possess extraordinary powers.
The story opens just before the Civil War, introducing us to Logan (Hugh Jackman) and Victor (a well-cast Liev Schreiber) as young brothers forced to come to terms with who and what they are. A nifty credit sequence, not unlike “Watchmen’s,” quickly takes us through their lives and the development of their relationship until we land somewhere around 1970 where both are mixed up in a secret and elite U.S. Military hit squad made up of other mutants and commanded by the oily General Stryker (Danny Houston).
A particularly ugly mission involving the killing of innocent civilians ends up being too much for Logan and he decides he’s had enough. But Victor (now Sabretooth) has shred much of his humanity over the decades, enjoys him some killing and feels he’s finally found a place for his mutant self among his own kind. For reasons that never fully make sense, this tension results in the brothers becoming mortal enemies.
In Canada, Logan builds himself a new life working as a lumberjack. He lives in a beautiful mountain home no lumberjack not living in a movie could ever afford and has found true love with Kayla Silverfox (the quite fetching Lynn Collins), his tender, understanding, live-in girlfriend.
What could possibly go wrong?
Yeah, I could’ve done without the old trope of the “sinister” military and really could’ve done without the arch-villain’s wildly out-of-place Dr. Evil speech about the necessity of “pre-emptive war” (I thought Obama told everyone to look forward?), but remove the superpowers and special effects and “Wolverine” is the same movie Charles Bronson made a dozen times between 1972 and 1987. And that’s a compliment.
The story’s lean, simple and thankfully, unlike its predecessors, more concerned with pacing than moralizing. The special effects are a little cheesy, but that only heightens the winning lack of ambition which is the film’s strongest element. Best of all, the action scenes don’t have you reaching for the Dramamine nor do they numb you with blazing overkill. The unholy shaky-cam is nowhere to be seen and the three or four set-pieces are choreographed and shot in a way that allows you to follow them.
If you worry as I do about origin stories that get bogged down in those layers of mythology that so please Those-Who-Have-Never-Felt-The-Touch-Of-A-Woman, no worries here, which is why the fanboy crowd might be disappointed. The introduction of new mutants and a younger version of an old favorite might help, but the story surrounding what made Wolverine Wolverine is refreshingly straight-forward and simple.
Emotionally the relationships never really connect, especially the central one between Wolverine and Sabretooth. The demands of the plot drive these characters when it should be the other way around. The need for an action scene or a “surprising” turn of events seems to change their relationship dynamic on a dime which makes it impossible to grasp or to invest in it. Logan’s relationship with Kayla is only a little better, but his connection with an elderly farm couple is the strongest element in the film but also the shortest.
This is Jackman’s fourth tour as Logan, the mutant who will be Wolverine, and he’s as good as I’ve seen him. The most important aspect of a movie star is clear-eyed confidence and an ease in your own skin. Jackman’s performance is effortless in that respect and shows no sign of the self-consciousness I’ve seen in his other work. Hopefully this will translate beyond the “X-Men” franchise.
“Wolverine” satisfies and works because it respects what it is and never pretends otherwise. Good actors and plenty of action expertly paced over 107 minutes with no aspirations beyond holding our attention.
So far, this is my kind of summer.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
35 Comments
The Daily Telegraph, London, didn’t seem too happy with the result: “It’s been claimed director Gavin Hood (2005’s Tsotsi), who saw the story as an exercise in post-traumatic-stress psychology, suffered the indignity of having Richard Donner of Superman fame brought on to make the final product more 'kick ass' and blast-intensive. It ends up a compromise, a ghastly hybrid, a film that appears to have pirated and wrecked its own potential.” Granted, teenage boys will make up their own minds.
I hate to say it but this is starting to sound like the first of the X movies worth watching – the other three were utter garbage.
Great to hear your thoughts on this John, I'll be watching tomorrow and add my thoughts on this thread after I do. From what I've seen, Jackman looks completely committed, looking forward to it.
I found this movie to be immensely predictable but only mildly irritating. I suggest that if you haven't seen it yet, that you wait for the DVD release and save your money for Star Trek.
Other than "a younger version of an old favorite…." you didn't mention how Gambit did in Wolverine's shadow.
Already one step ahead of you. =)
Don't let this review fool you, this movie is a flaming piece of crap, it's worse than X-men 3 by a longshot, familiar mutants are throwing in and out so far for no purpose other than to say .. oh look wow it's the BLOB!! yay!!
Any fan of comics I'm sure will be a fan of Deadpool, and if you are a fan of Deadpool, this movie is going to simply piss you off so bad you'll want them to just unmake it.
Thanks for the review. As much as I would love to watch a movie like this in an actual theater (the whole theater experience can add so much to an otherwise less-than-satisfying flick), we'll probably be waiting for the DVD to come out. I always thought Wolverine made the X-Men movies much more watchable than they would otherwise have been, but maybe that's just a visceral response on my part.
I don't disagree with the criticism I'm hearing, I just don't mind films that others qualify as "trash." If the story's unpretentious and fast moving, that's all I ask.
As a long ago comic book fan (Silver to Bronze age) who only returned to the hobby a few months ago, one of my complaints with Marvel stories as a kid was how unnecessarily long-winded they were. I love many of the Marvel characters, but, as a mere youth, was turned off by the 'preachiness" and the buckets of dialog… I mean "it's a comic book"! I'm glad to hear this movie "respects what it is and never pretends otherwise".
Overall, I've liked the X-Men movies. Having said that, I think one reason for their inability to satisfy is there are too many important characters to adequately give much depth to in an hour and fourty-five minutes.
Any more it's rare for me to catch a movie on the first run. I'll either wait for it to appear at the cheap theater or on DVD.
Ah, no. The first three X-Men movies were nothing special, true. But Wolverine feels like their poor cousin by comparison. Don't be fooled by Dirty Harry's inexplicably generous review. This movie is terrible.
I have to say that I agree with you. The characters of X-Men have so much depth and so much history as to what makes them who they are as characters comic fans enjoy today….how does a 90 minute or more movie cover all of that history without being "preachy", wordy, or whatever? Is it possible? Yes. Difficult to achieve? You bet. Sometimes we just need to ratchet up our suspension of disbelief and just enjoy a films like this. It is what it is.
I'll probably wait for dvd on this one. As a fan of the X-Men Trilogy, I think the prequel should fit. Considering Cyclops seemed to meet Logan for the first time in the first movie and also Sabretooth (working for Magneto) I just don't think I could get past the inconsistensies. Besides, who wants to see Cyclops played by anyone else besides James Marsden? Not looking for to it at all.
If it's just a generic hero romp I can go along with that, we just have some higher demands for Wolverine, I think someone who is not a fan will walk away simply entertained, but to fans some of the choices made in this movie are infuriating, kind of on the level that "The Davinci Code" would have to a Christian.
The thing with comic books is there are very few definitive takes of main characters. Marvel and DC have gone back and changed SO many things with their characters over the years, that expecting a movie to meet those changes head on is stupid. I'm a huge fan of Marvel and DC characters and their powers, but I don't expect much. Heck, for all intents and purposes, X-Men 3: The Last Stand was really the most comic-bookey of the trilogy and "fans" (really just people who have nothing better in life than to complain about make-believe characters) complain!
As far as I'm concerned with these Marvel and DC movies, just get the powers and attitudes right: in this case, Wolverine and Sabertooth have regenerative powers and hate each other (check), Gambit can make things explode by touching them (check), Emma Frost can turn her skin into diamond (check), Blob is not just fat but strong, Wraith can teleport (check check).
Some people, these "fans" that complain about everything, really need to get a life. Read the Bible and find someone God wants you to spend the rest of your life with! =)
The movie is bad. Wait to see it when it's on TV. I'm a comic book collector and this movie butchered the characters, especially Deadpool. Gavin Hood (who directed this) is the director of the anti-american movie Rendition. Another good reason not to pay to see this. I saw the leaked workprint.
AMEN to THAT!
The subtext of minority discrimination is (in this one instance) not Hollywood liberalism, it was the whole point of the original 1960's X-Men.
The movies are dumb, but charming to those of us who grew up reading the original X-men comics. Every character is spot on with the exception of Halle Berry as Storm. Hugh Jackman is the only guy I can imagine playing Wolverine.
Batman has never translated well to the screen in my opinion. Way too pretentious and overplayed.
SPOILERS:
This movie diverges from the comics canon in some ways, but the stuff about evil govt/military are simple tropes common to the Marvel comics this character comes out of. In Marvel. Mutants are persecuted by tghe govt who sees them as a threat. In the comics, Wolverine is made into Weapon X in Canada, not the US. The Canadians have the Weapon X team. But whatever.
Also, Deadpool doesn't have the combined powers of the X-Men. In the comics he's a nutty goofball who can't be killed, but people keep trying.
"…kind of on the level that "The Davinci Code" would have to a Christian."
Really? Having the basis of your entire worldview and belief system trashed — that level of infuritating?
I thought the movie was good. Its just an action film. As far as hollywood goes, they didn't butcher wolverine like other movies do (like that new dragonball movie).
I'm sorry about your beloved Deadpool, but Wolverine is more popular. Who's character is going to change more to mix into a plot for a WOLVERINE movie.
"I just don't mind films that others qualify as "trash." If the story's unpretentious and fast moving, that's all I ask." Could not agree more, not every movie has to be an arthouse project. As to the tension between brothers not making sense, it eschews from the "comics" origin story (did not like it [the origin story] anyway). The live in girlfriend was part three of the childhood friend triangle (both brothers fell in love with…blah, blah, blah). Not sure why they would remove this "ancient" story line, especially considering [when removed] it leaves the tension between the two brothers with an artificial taste.
Nolte might be right here (I haven't seen it yet….may go to see it at the outdoor theatre The Pink Cadillac for a double with Fast n Furious tommorrow). The Incredible Hulk (the first) was beset by the problem of someone trying to turn hot dogs into filet mignon. The Hulk needed lots of cool smashing and some morose scenes. Perhaps this straight revenge flick is what Wolverine needs.
Judging by how MovieBob reacted, yes.
http://moviebob.blogspot.com/2009/05/x-men-origin...
I think Nolte hit this review right on the head… I pretty much agree with everything!
First review I've really agreed with. It met all of my expectations for a good movie. I have a short list:
1. Did I look at my watch? No.
2. If I had to take a wiz did I hold it? Yea.. held it from the scene in the barn till the end of credits.
If I wanted to nit pick things, I'd get a job picking lice out of peoples hair. If people would stop looking at individual brush strokes all the time, then they might step back and see a pretty good picture that can hold your attention and that you might enjoy… otherwise all you see are squigly lines.
Just saw it, Jackman's never been better, he gave his all to this, and to think this is his fourth time out as Wolverine, very impressive. I enjoyed the surprising nice turns they had with the story, and John's right, this is a revenge picture, super-hero style, and it really works that way. I can't appreciate the disappointment of the Deadpool fan's regarding the film's take on the character, since what little I've read of him is completely forgettable, and I really cannot take any character that Rob Liefeld created seriously.
See, here's the thing: I'm NOT a guy who loses his mind over continuity and minutia. If I'm a fan, and there's some inside stuff that makes me grin, yeah, I'm inclined to look favorably; but on balance I don't really "care" much about fidelity – if I did, I wouldn't like the first two good X-films because nobody is wearing their proper uniform or because Stewart and McKellan don't even TRY to hide their British accents (Xavier is American and Magneto is a German of Jewish ancestry.) If the movie is GOOD and retains the core spirit of the material, they can shuffle the details around all they like for all I care. Do I "get" why Deadpool's fans are coming out of this spitting mad? Yes, but if the movie hadn't been badly made/written/plotted/acted otherwise it wouldn't have mattered much to me.
(cont)
I mean, you have to know your movie's in trouble when your opening credits are telling a more interesting story than the following 90% of the film. The whole thing in story and execution plays out like a white-trashy "Highlander" spinoff. And, while I'm at it…
:::MASSIVE SPOILER WARNING:::
/
/
/
/
/
I'm calling it right now: "Magic Amnesia Bullet" is this Summer's "Nuked the fridge."
/
/
/
/
The reason the badly-used character cameos in THIS irked me so much is that it plays as such a naked demonstration of contempt for the audience: "Should we try and get a better script, sir?" "Hell no! Just write a fat guy into one scene and call him The Blob, and the nerds'll smile and keeping gobblin' this tripe up!"
In the first x-men movie, Shadowcat was a teenager, in the second she was pre-teen. (Not to mention being a member of Excalibur, anyway)
[...] is still a kung-fu flick and a revenge flick with CGI is still a revenger . Some may confuse “Wolverine” with a superhero film, but make no mistake, it’s a revenger of the best kind: a [...]
This is my favorite movie. I have enjoyed the movie more than 8times.Thanks for your nice post. Have a nice time.
bye
Dog Life Jackets
there are so many areas of that Japanese story, I love the idea of this kind of anarchic character, the outsider, being in this world – I can see it aesthetically, too – full of honor and tradition and customs and someone who’s really anti-all of that, and trying to negotiate his way. The idea of the samurai, too – and the tradition there. It’s really great. In the comic book he gets his ass kicked by a couple of samurai – not even mutants. He’s shocked by that at first.
Simi Valley Real Estate
X-man is a awesome movie, i have seen all the part of X-men, but the wolverin is the most dareable part ever seen, thanks for the part of x-men………….
Mission Hills Real Estate
Immigration Solicitors…
[...]we like to honor other sites on the web, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[...]…
You must be logged in to post a comment.