Review: Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
by John NolteFor something you expect to be a light, fluffy, slightly moronic romantic comedy, “Ghosts of Girlfriends Past” has an awfully seedy undercurrent to it. The over-arching story might be about the redemption of Conner Meade (Matthew McConaughey), a flashy, Manhattan-based, fashion photographer who uses women like Kleenex, but that doesn’t mean the film opposes the idea that emotionless sexual encounters with strangers can still be fun. As Conner learns life lessons about true love, much of the supporting cast comically, and as though it’s their duty, seeks out sex with those they’ve just met.
Ultimately a movie has to be about something, and while “Ghosts” has its share of problems in every other area, having your protagonist go off in a wholesome direction while celebrating your supporting players sleazy ways, undercuts the one spot where the film had a chance to succeed — with a cohesive, unified theme.
It also leaves an unseemly aftertaste.
Things start out like you expect in a story about a playboy stud destined to learn the error of his loutish ways. We spend the first few minutes watching Conner squirrel through his ridiculously glamorous life as a celebrity photographer whose subjects are all strikingly beautiful, near-naked young women who seemingly enjoy being treated like trash. Conner charms, lies, insults and ultimately gets what he wants from them. So effective is his near-sadistic, blunt-force approach that even after his latest conquest watches him thoughtlessly break up with three heartbroken women all at once via teleconference (to save time), she buys his line and jumps his bones.
The wedding of Conner’s younger brother Paul (Breckin Meyer), takes him home to the estate of his recently deceased Uncle Wayne (Michael Douglas). Wayne was Conner’s mentor in female conquest, the man who taught him that “the power of a relationship lies with the one who cares the least,” advice Conner took to heart and has practiced ruthlessly for decades.
It was over Jenny (Jennifer Garner) where Conner almost lost his footing. She was his first love and his last. Unable to bear the idea of a relationship, he walked out. Unfortunately, she’s part of the wedding party and to convince her, everyone, but mostly himself that he made the right decision in leaving her, Conner puts a strain on the entire event by loudly and drunkenly denouncing love, marriage and commitment – and for extra credit decides to sexually make his way through some very willing bridesmaids.
Uncle Wayne quashes those plans when, like Ebenezer Scrooge’s Marley, he returns from the dead to forewarn Conner of the error of his ways and three coming visitations — the ghosts of girlfriends past, present and future.
Well-paced and frantic are not the same thing, and “Ghosts” is frantic from open to close. McConaughey does what he always does: instead of act, he charmlessly swaggers with confusion over the difference between self-confidence and self-satisfied as the plot tries to cover up countless flaws with a flurry of weak jokes and bad special effects. The production values as a whole are surprisingly lacking. Most of the film is set on a single estate and a few other interiors, none of which are designed with any imagination. The photography lacks warmth and whether CGI’d or not, the exteriors all look it.
Jennifer Garner does all she can to give the film a heart but she can’t surmount McConaughey’s uncanny knack for shallowness which swamps even his attempts at sincerity. The only memorable scenes arrive courtesy of Douglas who channels Robert Evans and squeezes all the life possible from a one-dimensional caricature. Even saddled with flat dialogue, Douglas skillfully manages to breathe life into his flashback scenes mentoring young Conner in the ways of manipulating women into the sack.
But back to that sleazy aftertaste… “Ghosts of Girlfriends Past” might someday work as a time capsule of sorts into the devolution of liberal feminism. If the goal was to devolve into living fantasies for slobbish men who objectify women and find them useful only to satisfy their sexual urges … you’ve come a long way baby.
“Ghosts of Girlfriends Past” opens everywhere Friday.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
45 Comments
Thanks for telling me (and the world) about all these bum movies. I swear you are saving moviegoers millions. Hollywood liberals must despise you. Just make sure you lock your cat, Pebbles, up at night though.
Skip the movie and reread "A Tale of Two Cities" — it's having its 150th anniversary today. The ghost of Dickens will thank you.
I look forward to your movie reviews. I kinda figured this was one to miss, but I enjoyed reading your review all the same. Thanks!
Is it just us or is their a HUGE disconnect between McConaughey's work as a leading man in romantic comedies
(insipid) and his often stellar work as a supporting actor in dramas ('U-571', 'Reign of Fire')? There are other actors who have somewhat schizo careers as well, but his shifts seem dramatic… the man has chops, no doubt.
Maybe a new manager would help…
Thanks for the heads up John !!!!
Sounds like another piece of Hollywood cow dung…..
Loved what you wrote on westerns….. when will Hollyweird let a real man make a movie again ?
One of my favorite performances of the 1990s was McConaughey as Wooderson in "Dazed and Confused." There is or once was an interesting actor in there…
But I don't blame McConaughey. He's making a fortune and successful. What I don't understand is why audiences go to this crap and make them hits. A bad action film can at least deliver explosions, but this, Fool's Gold, Four Christmases, What Happens in Vegas… Awful, awful films that make money. Dishearetening, to say the least.
And this isn't an elitest point of view, either. There's nothing wrong with a simple-plotted, affectionate romantic comedy like Two Weeks Notice or You've Got Mail. They don't all have to be When Harry Met Sally or Sleepless in Seattle…
But these are full-bore dreadful films … and yet people go. I don't get it.
I have learned that if a movie's trailer begins with the pronouncement: "THE FEEL GOOD MOVIE OF THE SUMMER!" then that movie will inevitably be a mangy dog. That is the death knell.
his performance in 'Dazed' was a seminal moment for those who graduated in the mid-late 70's; there are literally millions of kindred spirits… he does have real abilities. Perhaps this is a phase. But you are correct; it is largely regurgitated garbage.
Hollywood lost me on "The Wedding Date" (gaaa, sorry, I think I threw up a little in my mouth). I'm chicky enough to love romantic comedies (formula and all) but they clock you over the head with "oh let's hop in the sack to move the plot point" and they've lost me. I'm beginning to think "While You Were Sleeping" was the last, desperate fling of romantic Hollywood.
I remember when McConaughey started out and made movies like "A Time to Kill," and "Contact" and he seemed to have the makings of a solid movie career in motion. But when he made "How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days" I think he got sort of typecast as the romantic comedy guy. Which is too bad. I hate to see him reduced to just another pretty face.
I remember when "Lone Star" (I liked him in that) and "A Time to Kill" came out in '96 we got the barrage of magazine covers saying MM was the next movie star. He has made awful films for the last decade, but he has lasted much better than most Flavors of the Month. Especially considering his odd Bongo Drum-Dope adventures off screen.
Personally, I thought McConaughey (I had to type that out really slowly while reading above….man, why didn't they change that?) was wonderful in "Tropic Thunder." He (and everyone else in the movie) did a good job at making fun of their own stereotypes, in Matt's case (cause I'm not typing that out again) the over-confident/self-assured Hollywood type. I think it worked because everyone – actor and audience – were in on the joke. It's movies like this where he takes himself too seriously that it doesn't work. I did like him in Sahara though. Or, well, I liked Sahara, and he didn't hurt it.
we have heard he is an odd duck in real life… the bongo thing isn't that rare. He needs to grow up a tad…
funny thing is he ain't that pretty- they doll him up for these 'comedies' and he looks weird… he actually has a lot of character in his expressions which is exactly why his dramatic range is so good…
Oh, I dunno… I think he's pretty.
"But these are full-bore dreadful films … and yet people go. I don't get it."
By and large, "the people" are idiots. That's problem #1, but it's also a universal constant of human society: ONE Einstein, ONE Hawking, ONE Jefferson, etc. surrounded by billions and billions of John Q. Dumbass. Problem #2 is that useless movies like (apparently) this that "the people" gobble up are the cheapest and easiest films to make – even PORN at least has the issue of physical exhaustion to contend with.
As for McConaughey: Women and gay men by and large find him attractive, men by-and-large don't mind or even LIKE him because his "I'm just a laid-back beach bum dude" bit is likable and reminds a lot of them of how they'd like to see themselves.
As soon as one of my client companies opened its Human Resources Department–Division of Internal Terror and Enforcement of Company Secrecy, I knew the left had been correct all along. And that was just a department store.
I agree, "Sleeping" was nicely done, and by one of Austin's other part time movie star residents Sandra Bullock.
Douglas can do funny …. and he could pull an Alec Baldwin – re-invent himself as a comic supporting player.
I will be honest here… I find McConaughey attractive… I go because he is my eye-candy..
and it's about taste….. An example, there are so many people that find "Office Space", "40 year old virgin" and "Knocked Up" and many many others, absolutely hilarious… I simply can't sit through them… they are stupid…
However, I usually wait until these movies come out on DVD and just rent them…
I'm not a fan of either VIRGIN or KNOCKED UP, but OFFICE SPACE is a masterpiece. I spent 17 years in that world as a corproate bill collector and there were literally dozens of friday nights where that film kept me sane….
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta'.
I love LONE STAR, a small masterpiece in my opinion and McConaughey is pretty good in it, but Chris Cooper is the film's heart and soul. Slightly OT, but how that film flashes back is pure genius.
Not a big fan of A TIME TO KILL, but the unrequited sweaty passion between Bullock and McConaughey really carries the movie to some extent when I re-watch it, but it's always one of those movies I rewatch thinking it has to be better than I remembered it.
I've heard the McConaughey is a very, very genuinely nice guy in real life.
"Dazed" captures an era like few other films. It succeeds primarily because it doesn't try all that hard. Nothing crazy to mark the time and place. very subtle in that way with the hairstyles, clothes, attitude…
I can relate to the younger kids in the film, the young protagonist, because that was about my age.
I thought I watched the film a lot, but this girl I worked with watched it every friday night for three years… a ritual. She wasn't even born then, but she could quote the thing front to back… She was also a stunner, but turned everyone down on Friday nights for her D&Z ritual.
Douglas needs to stop with the plastic surgery. He's starting to look like a poor man's Bruce Jenner.
Are there any real men left in Hollywood?
Yeah, Douglas was good in the movie. He made chicken salad from chicken shit.
I don't know if it's just the fact that I am a sucker for sports movies, but I loved him in " We are Marshall".
I make it a point to not see any rom-com with him as I , inevitably, end up hating the female by the end.
So what's you're idea of GOOD comedy if you have no use for Office Space or 40 Yo Virgin? Please don't tell me anything with Eddie Murphy in this decade, Martin Lawrence and/or Tim Allen (Galaxy Quest and Toy Story 1 & 2 excepted), ESP. Martin…
I think of Romantic Comedies as, in some ways, as iconic as The Western…Remember when all those yay-hoos were out reinventing The Western (anti-heros and whatnot…)? The same applies to these sorry excuses for romantic comedies. It's a legitimate genre with structure and form. And way the heck better when people don't get to clever with the foundations…
I graduated in 1979, it is like they went back in a DeLorean and shot that movie.
Copy and paste is my BFF
McConaugheyMcConaugheyMcConaugheyMcConaugheyMcConaughey
Actually, I'd say there's a LOT wrong with "You've Got Mail" — but I don't want to go too far off on a tangent. (However, I once read a terrific article in the "Washington Post" explaining exactly why it's so inferior to "The Shop around the Corner."
You can have him!
Something about him creeps me out. For all I know he's a perfectly nice guy in real life — but he just creeps me out!
I just can't handle the subject matter.
Regarding romantic comedies, I can't think of anyone today who could equal the great Preston Sturges. He didn't make many movies, but he was a true original.
John Nolte — You found the movie "sleazy" but the problem is that this accurately characterizes the relationships between the sexes in most White, Urban, Middle-Upper Class professionals.
First, women look for a series of bad-boy flings, in their twenties and early thirties, then "settle" for whatever "beta male" they can persuade to marry them, or increasingly choose single motherhood if they have any kids at all.
You criticize the McConaughey character acting like a jerk, in front of the women who immediately bed him, without realizing that acting like a jerk is what made him attractive in the first place.
Romantic comedies don't work anymore because women are not looking for the model of romantic love followed by monogamous marriage. Instead a series of short-term affairs with the most stimulating, bad-boy, jerkiest guy around. Marriage is just a big Wedding Party for the girl with the groom a mere accessory, increasingly even that is something for either Gays or Rich New Yorkers (read the NYTIMES Wedding pages, hilarious SWPL territory).
Women love jerks, the more arrogant and cruel the better, because it means they are high status and can afford to treat women like that. A guy dumping three women at the same time is practically irresistible to women: instant validation that the guy was wanted by three different women, and can afford to dump them all (conclusion: he can do even BETTER!) Of course most women would jump into bed with a guy who looks and acts like that — it's entirely realistic.
What does it say that the most "romantic" comedy in recent years was "Enchanted" which featured a woman who had no real sexual experience as a cartoon character come to life? IMHO that broad social changes make the traditional romantic comedy unsustainable. No one believes in love/romance with all that sex in society, hookups as meaningless and drama-ridden as ordering out of the fast food drive up window.
In other words, Women Good, Men Bad, Part 3 Million and One.
"The photography lacks warmth and whether CGI’d or not, the exteriors all look it."
Ouch.
No. More like sexual mores changed, radically, so that no one cares about the romantic comedy. How can the audience CARE about a former womanizer when:
A. The guy can just pick up another girl?
B. None of the women seem compelling in the first place?
No one has solved that problem, just work-arounds (the girl is a Disney cartoon character come to life, or the girl is a "guy" out of Apatow movies).
Romantic comedies, like westerns, are essentially conservative. For a romantic comedy to work, everyone involved has to believe in absolute, permanent, traditional, life-affirming True Love. That's what makes the game worth playing, the stakes worth winning, the show worth watching.
Hollywood culture believes in Sex. Even if, say, the screenwriter believes in Love, his collaborators don't. Not really. So instead of romantic comedy we get sex farce disguised as romantic comedy. The result is always unsatisfying and often repellant.
But there remains a huge appetite for romantic comedy. Ersatz crap still makes money because the real thing isn't being made – except sometimes for TV, where the demand for good writers is so voracious that sometimes conservatives can get a job.
That "unseemly aftertaste" is simply a property of a McConaughey movie. The guy gives off a distinctly oily vibe.
I agree with Patrick for the most part. But I disagree with "whiskey" – I think romantic comedies do work – which is why they're still being produced – precisely because our culture and society has gone so far in the direction of meaningless flings and Sex as the end-all be-all. Women, even though they're constantly told this and many do live lifestyles like this, fundamentally don't want it to be that way, which is why so many of us seek escapism and temporary gratification for our unfulfilled desires in romantic comedies. Everyone knows romantic comedies are just grown-up fairy tales. And why do we watch them? Because we still want to believe that Prince Charming exists and that he's out there and that he will find us. So no, I can't agree – I think we watch romantic comedies BECAUSE our culture is sex-saturated and our love lives unsatisfying and because we want something different, even if on a deep obscure level, and romantic comedy is perhaps the only genre we can still count on to deliver the love-beats-sex/true-love really does exist/happy-ever-after formula. Granted, the ratio of true love/romance to sex in romantic comedies is getting lower and lower – but still. Romantic comedy writers and producers, by the vast majority, know what audiences want from a chick flick – and that is pure-hearted romance and True Love.
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past was horrible however. See my thoughts on it here – http://coffeeandirony.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/gh...
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
[...] Vital Choices for Happy RelationshipsYour Questions Almost Stop Being Jealous And InsecureBig HollywoodHow can I get over my girlfriends disturbing sexual past?My Ex-boyfriends Girlfriends Hate Letter To [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.