Summer Movie Season: The Good, the Bad and the Maybe — Part III: Could Go Either Way
by John NolteWith “Wolverine” opening this Friday, summer finally, finally arrives.
We’ve celebrated the good. We’ve dreaded the bad.
Now on to the maybes; those that could fall either way, or just do the minimum by delivering a couple hours of forgettable entertainment. I’ll take that and truth be told, when the lights dim, they’re all “maybes” to me because when the lights dim I’m twelve again. But the lights aren’t dimming now and in the cool light of day I’m on the fence over these.
–
May 22nd: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian - The first one was a splendid concept brought down by a cookie-cooker plot involving a dad having to redeem himself. The hope is that the sequel is looser and less constrained by boilerplate convention. I’m a little ticked The Mighty Mickey Rooney wasn’t brought back, but it’s still a great concept and one helluva cast.
–
May 29th: Drag Me to Hell – After being buried for nearly a decade by Spider-Man, director Sam Raimi makes a long overdue return to his roots in the horror genre. This is a “maybe” because as a huge fan of the “Evil Dead” trilogy, I. Must. Manage. Expectations. Everything that made “Evil Dead” so special, the low-budget, the obvious hunger to succeed… Well, let’s just say that it’s not easy to go home again. Who am I kidding … I’m counting the days.
–
May 29th: Up – Pixar or no, animation is not my bag. What can I say, I like actors. In this whole burst of animation over the last decade or so, I’ve only fallen in love with “Ratatouille,” and “The Incredibles,” the former especially. Brad Bird is responsible for both and not involved with “Up.”
–
June 5th: The Hangover – Drunken misadventures in Las Vegas. Could be lame, could be a mindless gem like Tom Hanks’ “Bachelor Party.” If the runtime hangs around 90 minutes, there’s hope. Another positive is BenderSpink, a hit-or-miss production company, but they do comedies well. I’m also heartened by the fact that Judd Apatow is in no way involved.
–

I know this photo is from the first one and I don’t care.
June 24th: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - Except for that godawful shaky-cam, the first one delivered in a lot of ways. It was also openly patriotic and very pro-military. Please, Michael Bay, step away from the shaky-cam. It probably wouldn’t hurt to cut 35-minutes out of the 147-minute runtime, either.
–
June 26th: The Hurt Locker - Director Kathryn Bigelow understands driven men of action better than most male directors and earned my eternal goodwill with the lean mean vampire-Western, “Near Dark” way back in 1987. She’s an enormously gifted director, but her script choices always lack. The stories are too long and too cluttered. In some cases, like “Blue Steel” and “Point Break,” you can see there’s a great film struggling to get out. If “Hurt Locker” were 101 minutes instead of 131, my enthusiasm would be higher. I do, however, trust her to tell an Iraq war story respectfully.
–
July 31st: Funny People – Judd Apatow has yet to make a film I’m glad I saw. His crudeness is strictly for crudeness sake (you can always feel the strain for the “iconic” moment), his stars are almost always incapable of sincerity or warmth, and his self-indulgence is everywhere with scene after scene that lingers unnecessarily long, way past a payoff. On the other hand, Adam Sandler is the star here and I’ve been a fan of the Happy Madison sensibility since “Billy Madison.” So there’s no telling what to make of this. But I’d bet my house that the 131-minute runtime is a problem.
You might have noticed a pattern here and that’s the length of some of these.
The talent and confidence to tell a simple, linear story with a satisfying climax and sympathetic characters seems all but dead today. “Taken,” “Gran Torino,” and Stallone’s revival of his Rocky and Rambo characters did it, but nowadays too many of these films are over-stuffed as if dulling the senses with special effect excess is the goal. And if you can’t tell a simple story well, all you have left is your effects budget.
That Judd Apatow is taking this philosophy to comedies is the most disturbing trend in modern film since that godawful shaky-cam.
Here’s hoping they’re all classics and make $300 million.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
49 Comments
Hollywood is incapable of writing short stories anymore. Everybody has to make everything EPIC.
You're right… that picture *is* from the 1st Transformers movie… and I'm glad you chose it!
You're right… that picture *is* from the 1st Transformers movie… and I'm glad you chose it!
I'm looking forward to Hurt Locker. That was my MOS eons ago. No finer men, none braver.It was my honor to serve with them .My Charles County Crab is my most cherised possession, and the hardest earned
I think part of the time dilemma is tied to ticket prices. If it's short, will people be as tempted to spend money on it?
I think part of the time dilemma is tied to ticket prices. If it's short, will people be as tempted to spend money on it?
Honestly I'm of the opinion that unless you have epic source material to begin with (and most original screenplays aren't) then going over 90 minutes by any significant measure usually means they're just wandering around hoping a story comes out of it somehow, there are exceptions of course, but I have to agree with you on that one. I don't hate long movies, at all, but I don't think most (and by most I'm thinking 95%) movies really need 2 hours or more to tell their story.
I'll go to a Kingdom Hollywood movie if I am paid and the popcorn and drinks are free.
In the name of 'spreading the wealth' Kingdom Hollywood should be the first to step up to the plate since they're the RICH people who spent $10,000+ per plate to attend the hundreds of George Clooney to get their 'Wealth-spreader-in-Chief elected.
After all Kingdom Hollywood it's all about The O; fair is fair so start speading your wealth.
Free popcorn and drink while getting paid to see movies; now this is a shovel-ready job I can support.
Personally I'd rather pay the same price for 90 minutes of good movie, than 120+ of bad movie, but you may have a point there with how some people would equate time with worth. That's actually probably how the studios see it too.
Hurt Locker is the only one of those I'm looking forward to.
This is the first summer movie season I've been even remotely looking forward to in years.
Definitely looking forward to "Up". Pixar has done no wrong in my book. I was okay with "Night at the Museum" but this seems to be taking a slim premise much too far.
As for Apatow, I'm not a big fan either, but I thought Carrell and Kinner conveyed warmth in "40 Year Old Virgin".
I'm looking forward to Mike Judge's "Extract", but I see that is not really a summer release, coming in September.
"Up" is the only movie this season I'm interested in.
There's also a movie called "9" that i think comes out this summer. Looks really amazing! The trailer is all over the interwebs.
I have to agree with you there. Hurt Locker looks intriguing. Maybe the Sam Raimi movie. The rest look formulaic and pointess. I like Ben Stiller, but his last few efforts have been getting increasingly more sterile. Modern animation does nothing for me — if you're going to try to recreate real life, just hire actors. Cartoons should employ cartoon physics.
I have to agree with you there. Hurt Locker looks intriguing. Maybe the Sam Raimi movie. The rest look formulaic and pointess. I like Ben Stiller, but his last few efforts have been getting increasingly more sterile. Modern animation does nothing for me — if you're going to try to recreate real life, just hire actors. Cartoons should employ cartoon physics.
I'm one of the rich people who make over $2500.00 per year (and you all thought he said $250,000.00 per year), so my taxes will be eating up any money I might have spent on going out to the movies. I'll just have to wait until they come to TV, and then I'll watch them on my illegal patch into my rich neighbor's cable feed. He makes over $7500.00 per year, but he has a good tax accountant, and he voted for Obama. He can afford those luxuries.
I'm one of the rich people who make over $2500.00 per year (and you all thought he said $250,000.00 per year), so my taxes will be eating up any money I might have spent on going out to the movies. I'll just have to wait until they come to TV, and then I'll watch them on my illegal patch into my rich neighbor's cable feed. He makes over $7500.00 per year, but he has a good tax accountant, and he voted for Obama. He can afford those luxuries.
Bachelor Party is a "mindless gem"? I think you got that half right.
Drag Me to Hell sounds very similar to Stephen King's Thinner, but I do like Sam Raimi when he tackles horror.
Forgot to add this above. Judd Apatow is a strange character for me. I loved his tv shows and don't like his movies. Don't know why.
Strange Days is also a fantastic movie from Bigelow. Some of the stuff seemed a bit dated even when it was released (basically anything having to do with the Rodney King-ish sub-plot), but Angela Bassett's Mace made up for any and all shortcomings. That movie still has one of the best kisses I've ever seen in a movie.
I can't get excited about Up yet. I don't mind animation, but nothing about the premise of this particular movie grabs me. People who have seen it already say it's really good though, so I think I'll wait for word-of-mouth from people I know.
I'll be there for opening night of Drag Me To Hell. It sounds like a great PG-13 genre movie. I can't believe my fingers just typed those words, but there y'go.
Yes! 9 looks amazing. The short at http://preview.tinyurl.com/2lz8nf is very, very good.
If not for Big Hollywood, I would never have heard about "Hurt Locker," which I do want to check out. Thank BH for shining the light on otherwise ignored gems.
Other movies I'm looking forward to are Transformers 2, Star Trek, Night at the Museum 2, and UP. Wolverine is a maybe.
@AndrewPrice
Actually, computer animated films are still largely unrealistic since they star talking toys (Toy Story), intelligent robots (Wall-E), talking animals (too many to list), and superheroes (Incredibles). So, cartoon physics still apply though not to the extent of a Bugs Bunny cartoon.
One more thing. Animated characters increasingly prove better than live actors. Exhibit A: compare the Oscar-worthy Incredibles to the lackluster, live action Fantastic Four. So, I don't mind cartoon characters competing with flesh-and-blood actors for roles. Maybe some of the overrated hacks with an agenda (e.g., Sean Penn) will go into another line of work.
Easiest way to ruin any movie is to either throw Adam Sandler or Billy Zane in it.
I love R-rated comedies and Apatow's movies all have their moments and big laughs, but they're 30+ minutes too long! Not one of them has understayed its welcome. That guy needs an editor.
9 will be to dark animation what Toy Story was to Pixar's success? It has amazing visuals and a deep story so both will make it a must see this Summer.
I wouldn't be surprised if The Hangover turned out to be the "Three Stooges" movie worth waiting for!
The only time it's justified is when they're adapting a story that was considerably epic in the original. The Lord of the Rings NEEDED to be nine hours long. Atlas Shrugged NEEDS to be a five-episode HBO miniseries.
My benchmark for "compelling story in compact format" is the original version of The Manchurian Candidate, which barely goes over the two-hour mark and yet manages to pack in a considerable amount of convoluted plot.
No arguments on any of your points, some stories need to be long for plot purposes. I'm still trying to find some solid info on what they're going to do with "Game of Thrones" by George Martin, I've seen rumors abounding about it, but no real details on what it'll wind up being, a miniseries would be best in my opinion because like you said about Atlas Shrugged, it needs to be that long. But a fluffy comedy full of fart jokes, probably not so much as far as needing 2 hours to get the point across.
I hadn't heard about a "Game of Thrones" project.
Shouldn't he finish the damn story, first?
All I heard were some vauge rumors from an RPG site (games not boom) about it getting picked up by HBO. After that, nothing.
And yeah him finishing the story would be a bonus as well, I was a little let down at the last novel being "half the story I wrote" and it being all new characters for the most part. I hope he doesn't wind up going down the Jordan path where it seemed like he was getting paid by the word or something after the first 3 books.
I have a friend who saw Hurt Locker already. He liked it, and being fully aware of my conservative sensibilities and support for the war, thought that I would like it, too. So that's something.
I don't know if they've carried through with this, but when the project was announced Game of Thrones was to be a series, with each season — presumably 13 episodes — adapting one book.
So I guess you never made it to the movies between 1992 and 2000. Pity, there were a couple of good ones.
Whatever happened to the new movie made from the book, "The Road?" It was all ready to be released back in November – then —-nothing! Is it a real bomb? Or, what??
Even if it's just OK, I predict Night at the Museum 2 will go neck-and-neck with Up for biggest haul this summer.
Is there a more divisive actor than Adam Sandler? He's a love/hate generator if such a thing exists in pictures. Me, I love his work and will watch anything he's involved in. Echoing the poster above, I too loved Bigelow's "Strange Days."
Got a few observations in regards to the post, Mr. Nolte:
1) Horror movies don't usually interest me, and not because they are too scary; they can be just so boring.
2) Don't know about Up, but every Pixar film I've ever seen I have always found very funny and very enjoyable.
3) The Hangover reminds me of the straight-to-DVD crap always being peddled by National Lampoon.
4) As long as Transformers 2 & Night At The Museum 2 are as good as their predecessors, there'll be no complaints from me.
5) I'm weary of Iraq War films to such an extant that I remain reluctant to see The Hurt Locker, regardless of what Kathryn Bigelow may contribute as director.
6) Odds are, I won't be watching Funny People. Judd Apatow's reputation has preceded him by a great margin.
By the way, I've stopped commenting as MorganLR. Trying to log in to IntenseDebate was nothing short of frustrating.
I've read that 'Up' is absolutely amazing. I'm looking forward to that after the mediocre (but still entertaining) Monsters Vs Aliens. Those of us with 9 year-olds need some entertainment too.
BTW, you were very wrong about Star Trek (although the trailers were fairly difficult to judge by). People I trust have seen the movie and ALL of them say it's the best Trek movie yet, with the best effects. It's going to be a spectacular sci-fi movie, although I doubt it will approach Iron Man/Dark Knight levels. RT currently has it at 100%.
I have seen the first half of Up at an industry show. Everyone loved it. Extremely original story, characters and script. The current marketing and trailers do not do it justice.
John, you, and everybody else, is being sold a bill of lies on The Hurt Locker. The push must be coming from a studio that has realized anti-Iraq movies bomb (and probably is less agitated now that Bush is gone), but the Hurt Locker is a relentlessly, ridiculously anti-American, anti-military movie.
I served six months in Baghdad assisting in the prosecution of detainees at an Iraqi court. I saw this movie over there. It's ridiculously left-wing and ridiculously bad. I have respect for Bigelow's talents (loved Strange Days in high school), but this movie is terrible.
They are brining 'Game Of Thrones' to the screen? I hand't heard that one, that would have to be an epic, bigger then LOTR.
Re: Drag Me To Hell. I'm a big fan of Sam Raimi's Evil Dead trilogy too, so imagine my disappointment when I went to the IMBD link to learn more about the film and found NO "Fake Shemp's" listed in the cast. So disappointed, so disappointed….
I just saw a trailer for Night at the Museum that had Custer repeatedly mispronouncing Sacajawea's name. He finally gives up and says, "Mission Accomplished". Um. That's right. Bush is retarded, has no rapport with brown people and may as well have slaughtered them. I no longer plan on taking my family to see it. Funny I can take. Mean spirited is another thing altogether.
Megan Fox brings the term "fox" to all new levels of foxy.
As long as you digitally remove all the stupidly insipid tats and don't ask her to do any profound thinking…or any thinking at all, apparently.
I would really like to put in an order for a young stunner like her with Rice's mind, Coulter's humor, and Derek's curves…*sigh*.
Where do I sign up?
I would make a hell of a movie reviewer. Except for my conservatism…
Can you imagine a politically motivated animated character acceptable to Penn? Yecch…
That's a brain-softener I could sleep through.
Wait for Netflix, friend. Pre-screen anything you might want to buy to keep, watch the marginal stuff once to say you did, and hated it; and easy pass the garbage someone else paid full price for.
You can even get a hookup to switch the live streams on line and send it direct to the TV.
Actually, I already do that, but don't tell anyone. If the State of California finds out I even had enough money for that, they'll be on me like vultures.
You must be logged in to post a comment.