Interview: Andrew Klavan’s Latest Thriller Offers Teens a Genuine American Hero
by John NolteBig Hollywood: First off, thank you for doing this. When the opportunity to write “The Last Thing I Remember“ (available April 28th) came along, you told me about the motivation behind what the publisher and you wanted to do with what you’re calling “The Homelanders Series.” It’s a fascinating idea and about time.
Andrew Klavan: Well, to begin with, you know how much I love video games… I wanted to write a story such that, if a kid had my book in one hand and a video game in the other, he’d choose the book-it’d be that exciting. And Thomas Nelson publishers and I are offering a guarantee that if you start this story and aren’t completely swept away, John Nolte will personally come to your house and sing the entire screenplay of Hondo to the tune of “Fella with an Umbrella.” So you can’t lose. But of course, if you want to tell a story that cool, you can’t preach and you can’t hammer people with your point of view, so I decided, okay, I just want to change the rules of the game, that’s all. Instead of the usual alienated teen, or the wimpy guy who finds a magical sword, I’m gonna make my hero the kind of hero I like to read about: a manly guy who loves America, believes in God and is ready to fight for liberty if he has to. I thought, in the current climate, that alone would be revolutionary.
–
BH: For the record, people should know that either the Thomas Nelson Guarantee can bring me to your home to sing the “Hondo” screenplay to the tune of “Fella with an Umbrella,” or $10.
Anyone who reads fiction is used to protagonists with leftist viewpoints, especially from teenage characters. This has become the default position and accepted norm, but I hadn’t really realized how common this was until I met your protagonist Charlie West. It shouldn’t be a shock to meet a fictional high school kid who loves his country and believes in God, but such is modern-day pop culture.
AK: Exactly-and what people don’t realize is that an enormous system is in place to make sure such heroes are not the norm. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s a created climate of opinion, a sort of critical consensus of what is and is not acceptable to say, what’s cool, what’s realistic, what’s entertaining. Cross that line and-no matter how entertaining you are, how thoughtful you are, how much fun your book or movie is-you’ll be slammed, denounced, ridiculed and generally not allowed to sit at the cool kids’ table. Luckily, I don’t have to worry about that, because WHEREVER I sit is the cool kids’ table. Mostly because I sit next to you, but still…
–
BH: Who was your model for Charlie? Not to declare you un-hip, but modern, teenage culture; how they communicate and all the gadgets available to them felt very real.
AK: Yeah, well, I know I don’t look like it, but I actually do pay attention. I have a teen-aged kid and I’m involved in his life and know his friends, plus it’s very easy to do research because real life kids are all on line telling everything to everybody. But mostly, it’s this strange thing that happens to me when I write: suddenly I know things I never really realized I know. My wife always teases me that I can’t find a fork in our kitchen, but I sit down to write someone cooking a souffle and I get it just right. It’s kind of weird actually and raises an interesting question: where DO we keep the forks?
–
BH: One of Charlie’s heroes and inspiration throughout is Winston Churchill. Was it the quote Charlie lives by that brought you to Churchill, or did Churchill bring you to the quote?
AK: Oh, definitely Churchill to the quote. As you know, I lived in England seven years, and he became one of my culture heroes. You know, it’s easy to look at these historical guys and forget that, when they took their stands, when they showed their courage, history wasn’t a done deal, they didn’t know how it was going to come out, that they were going to win through and be the hero. There were a lot of people then, as there are now, who wanted to move softly, softly. Don’t let’s be beastly to the Germans. Don’t insult Hitler and he’ll go away. Churchill was in political exile for years but he didn’t compromise. He stood his ground. And that’s the kind of integrity, the kind of courage in the face of self-doubt, that my hero, Charlie West, is searching for.
–
BH: Obviously the book’s emphasis and primary goal is to tell an exciting story. The first page hooked me immediately and the pages didn’t stop turning from there. So how would you describe the book? Not just the story, but what you want people to get out of it.
AK: Well, Charlie is this fairly ordinary, straight arrow kid who goes to bed one night and wakes up strapped to a chair being tortured by terrorists. He hasn’t lost his memory-he knows who he is-he just doesn’t know what happened between the time he turned out the light and now-and how he’s gonna get out of it before they kill him. The themes develop sort of naturally out of that. Charlie has been put in a position where a lot of the beliefs he was certain about when his life was comfortable have now been suddenly thrown open to question in a very immediate and terrifying way. His faith, his loyalties, his liberty are all under assault, and he’s not only got to keep himself from getting killed, he’s got to rediscover the reasons for what he believes so he can defend those beliefs. Now that’s something that I think a lot of young people know about because they often go into a period where they question everything they were taught. And it’s something I know a lot about too because I had to completely reshape my belief system and identity somewhat late in life. So basically I wanted to allow readers to experience that journey with Charlie in the most exciting way I could think of.
–
BH: After a time, I thought of Charlie as the anti-Jason Bourne (at least the film version of Bourne). Charlie is on the run trying to unravel his past, but unlike Matt Damon’s character, he is not a moody, rank narcissist hoping to get in touch with his feelings and sort out personal issues. I guess this is the difference between the hero and anti-hero.
AK: The whole purpose of the anti-hero is to assert man’s individuality in the face of a conformist society. But where’s the conformity now? It’s political correctness, it’s easy ungrateful radicalism protected by the might of the US Marines, it’s artists pretending to speak truth to power when what they’re really doing is kowtowing to powerful left wing critics and producers. Charlie stands for the truth as God gives him to understand it, whether that makes him popular or not, whether it endangers his life or not. The ancients had a word for that: they called it manhood, and Charlie’s got it. The whole thing about Bourne is that he was created in the 1970’s and so was the antiquated worldview of today’s so-called radical artists. In truth, they ought to be wearing big sideburns and bell bottoms. They think they’re cutting edge, but they’re really just Saturday Night Fever.
–
BH: There’s a Readers Guide at the end of “The Last Thing I Remember.” Is the idea to get this in classrooms or in the hands of teenagers in some structured way?
AK: Well, that’s something publishers do because it helps teachers discuss the book with kids, helps kids learn to think about what they’re reading. But I’m not involved in it except to give my approval. My job is to write the story. And to pose for the picture of the young man on the cover. All right, I’m lying.
–
BH: There’s also a preview of the next chapter in the Charlie West series, due in February of 2010.
AK: Yes, and I’m glad to say the book is already done. Charlie has to go home in the sequel to try and clear his name. I found it a very moving story to write, because everything and everyone he loves is right nearby but he can’t reach out to them for fear of bringing them into danger with him.
–
BH: I loved “Don’t Say a Word,” which was adapted into a terrific feature film starring Michael Douglas. One of your “Last Thing I Remember” characters, Crazy Jane, seemed to be a nod to the “Don’t Say a Word” character played so well by Brittany Murphy.
AK: I’ve always been fascinated with madness, schizophrenia especially. I suppose it raises serious questions about reality and identity that are important to storytelling, especially the stories I write in which the search for truth is so central. There’s also something extraordinarily heart-wrenching about it because, I’ve worked with disturbed people, on hotlines and in shelters, and you get the powerful sense that the real person, the person God made them to be, is in there, but can’t break through the prison of their disease. You just want to rip the disease open with your bare hands and set them free.
–
BH: When it comes to the creative process, how do you go about writing a story like this? It’s obviously structured meticulously and deliberately; is this something you outline beforehand or find as you go?
AK: Oh no, I’m a big outliner. I’ve written outlines almost as long as books. I’m obsessive about it. Because the plot is the frame of the house and, for me, it’s got to be more or less in place so you can do the richer, deeper things that make it spring to life, the characters, the themes, the emotions. What good is any of that, if the reader is thinking, wait a minute, that doesn’t make sense, that would never happen. So the plot has to work before I get started because I don’t want to be troubled by it when I’m supposed to be delving into a character’s heart. I don’t want to get to the moment of profound revelation and suddenly think, holy moley, Colonel Mustard’s supposed to be in the library with the lead pipe!
–
In part two, which runs tomorrow, Andrew Klavan talks more about his writing and creative process, and what it’s like to be openly conservative in the world of publishing and Hollywood.







Subscribe via RSS
27 Comments
Just finished Empire of Lies. Talk about a page turner! I could not put it down, excellent, excellent book. I'm going to buy this one for one of nephews, who about the age of the hero in the new book.
I read the 'professional' review on Amazon and was amazed at the stupidity of the closing line – "the 'rah-rah' patriotism may put some people off". Yeah, that's the worst thing our kids could possibly be exposed to: love of their country.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Great interview. Thanks John and Andrew, really look forward to reading the latest, even if I am a few years beyond the target audience. For the record I know Drew Klavan and there is a reason he says "I’ve always been fascinated with madness, schizophrenia especially."…write what you know
It'll never catch on. If we end up with decent teenagers, who's going to end up populating the Democrat Party?
Unless I'm mistaken, this is a first for BH. Interviewing an artist in conjunction with the publication of his new book. Excellent. I hope to see more of this down the line, Q and A with other artists as well. I enjoyed the read and look forward to part two tomorrow.
Andrew sharing about his creative process and what it's like to be openly conservative in the world of publishing and Hollywood should be good.
Thanks guys.
I'd like to say something but I must go off to Amazon and buy the book.
Along with that, I'll order another copy of "Empire of Lies." I lend them out, they never come back. I consider it a sort of seed-sowing of conservatism. I think I've passed out thirty or forty copies of "Atlas Shrugged" through the years.
I liked Empire of Lies myself, but found it a little too preachy in some places. The main character, though, makes the book worth reading.
Bonneie, I was intrigued by the fact that you have worked at educating others by sharing books, and really enjoyed reading your thread of comments. Now I am going to have to get my log-in to work right, so I can get a post count, and follow you, Andrew Price and LawHawkSF—and other new favorite pundits (is there a line for the on-line analyst of which I am unaware?)
Great post(s)!
That wasn't the bit that annoyed me. After all, there are some readers who *would* be "put off" by the 'rah-rah' patriotism". There's no harm in warning them off (although, strangely, book reviewers rarely bother to warn me about anti-Americanism and left-wing story lines in thrillers). No, what annoyed me was:
"On the other hand, this is just the first book in the Homelanders series, so there is still plenty of time for Charlie to develop shades of gray."
In other words, 'maybe he'll become a cynical left-wing antihero, and therefore culturally approved'.
[...] Manasa Reddy added an interesting post on Interview: Andrew Klavanâ Permalink Comments [0] [...]
Okay, stupid question time again.
I'm not quite sure how to phrase this but I'm still not sure what the problem is with shades of gray. Either that, or I have seriously misunderstood what the phrase means. Can't we have both? Black and white with a few shades somewhere in the middle? I think my issue is (and Mr. Klavan might be able to vouch for this), when people read the phrase "black and white," they interpret it as "lack of complexity" or "2-D." And from reading Mr. Nolte's classic film reviews, those heroes were anything but simple or 2-D. It's not that they were squeaky-clean, it's what they did – their actions that made the difference.
Just curious. And what happened to the ratings system here? I've been stuck at 48 for three weeks.
Sweet! I'm going to have to read this.
I love Klavan's writing and fully agree with his worldview. I haven't read THE LAST THING I REMEMBER yet but I did read EMPIRE OF LIES and found it to be… well, not boring exactly — NOTHING Klavan writes can be boring — but perhaps a shade less satisfying than his other novels and here is why: The big explosive ending that Klavan devises for the story — an ending that involves the (refreshingly) conservative hero and an actor clearly patterned on William Shatner up on stage in a packed arena interacting with a bunch of holograms (or something) — was ultimately very silly, and undermined much of the finely calibrated suspense that came before it.
Not a bad novel by any stretch, but by Klavan's standards, a disappointment.
The problem isn't with "shades of gray" as such, but that the phrase has become a code-word among critics for left-wing politics, anti-heroism, and anti-Americanism. It's like 'nuance'. However, I haven't read the book, so it is possible that the reviewer didn't mean it in the way I assumed he did. I wouldn't bet on it, though.
"when people read the phrase 'black and white,' they interpret it as 'lack of complexity' or '2-D.'"
That's because when that phrase is used, that's almost invariably the intended meaning.
"And from reading Mr. Nolte's classic film reviews, those heroes were anything but simple or 2-D."
Do you mean that you think the phrase refers to old black and white movies? If so, that's the first time I've ever seen it interpreted in that way. I've always seen "black and white" used to mean extremes and opposites, like 'good and evil', or 'night and day'. Of course, people do often claim (usually falsely, as you pointed out) that heroes in classic movies were overly simplistic characters, which could account for the confusion.
The problem isn't with "shades of gray" as such, but that the phrase has become a code-word among critics for left-wing politics, anti-heroism, and anti-Americanism. It's like 'nuance'. However, I haven't read the book, so it is possible that the reviewer didn't mean it in the way I assumed he did. I wouldn't bet on it, though.
"when people read the phrase 'black and white,' they interpret it as 'lack of complexity' or '2-D.'"
That's because when that phrase is used, that's almost invariably the intended meaning.
"And from reading Mr. Nolte's classic film reviews, those heroes were anything but simple or 2-D."
Do you mean that you think the phrase refers to old black and white movies? If so, that's the first time I've ever seen it interpreted in that way. I've always seen "black and white" used to mean extremes and opposites, like 'good and evil', or 'night and day'. Of course, people do often claim (usually falsely, as you pointed out) that heroes in classic movies were overly simplistic characters, which could account for the confusion.
Just got back from Amazon, now I just have to wait for it to arrive….
Thank you for the interview. As a middle school librarian, I am always looking for action packed books for my students. As you commented, so many of the books for students today have a very liberal slant. Off the subject somewhat, but I am saddened by the authors of YA books who automatically assume that it is normal for teenagers to engage in sexual activity. Yes, it is on their minds, how could it not be. Kids are constantly being bombared with sex with every turn. I was very disheartened to find that the last two books of a very popular series for girls had the main character constantly worrying about having sex with her boyfriend. Not IF, but when. I suppose the author would make the point that her 17 year-old character was growing up with the target audience. However, she doesn't know her audience. The high school librarian has told me that the high school girls don't read her books. That leaves my 12 to 14 year-old students as her main audience. Publishers are clueless, I think.
Anyway, thanks for giving us a real hero. I can't wait to get your book.
I read Empire of Lies and loved it. My 12 year old read The Last Thing I remember and literally INHALED it in two nights…she stayed up well past bedtime to finish it (flashlight under the covers and all) and raved about it. She just loved it…was interesting, fast paced, did not talk down to kids but also was understandable…and she liked the classic good guy bad guy thing…
The only thing she was miffed about….was knowing that it is going to be too long for her taste for the next book to come out.
Liberty Lady…check out the upcoming Celtic Portal series…action packed and written without the gratuitious sex
Bravo, sir. And a nice description of the kultursmog.
"Instead of the usual alienated teen, or the wimpy guy who finds a magical sword, I’m gonna make my hero the kind of hero I like to read about: a manly guy who loves America, believes in God and is ready to fight for liberty if he has to. I thought, in the current climate, that alone would be revolutionary."
A little over a year ago, I had this exact idea in mind when I started my novel. A couple of my friends have read the first draft, and told me the character is one-dimensional. Needless to say, I was disappointed in them — they kept giving me this moral-equivalent crap, even as I tried to explain the challenges the character must face from outside and within himself.
I've taken all advice about my pacing, dialogue, and everything else, but I'm standing firm on my main character. Reading about this book is a nice little piece of affirmation.
I hope Andrew does well with this book.
I teach high school English, which has been reduced to the study of pc themes and weak writers who dwell on psychobabbling boys whose crises invariably involve weeping over paternal abuse and a turning away from violence (manhood, in my day). For example, one novel about a young boy's experience during the American Revolution ended with the statement that the war had been worth it but it was too bad it couldn't have been done without violence – I kid you not. Of course, gays and girls and abused minorities were the foci of other novels and textbooks. Boring and infuriating. Hopefully an appreciation of manhood and womanhood will return. Your book sounds wonderful.
[...] Note: This is the second part of a two-part interview. Part one can be found here. [...]
Isn't that the truth! I am so tired of books being chosen for school literature anthologies because of diversity and pc themes. Most of them are trite. I have become disgusted also at the obvious choices made by those who pick the titles for the children's book awards. Pick one for "PC" column A , another for "PC" column B, etc. Some of the books are excellent and others are there simply because they are the only ones to fill the slot in "PC" column C. Getting really cynical in my old age.
Isn't that the truth! I am so tired of books being chosen for school literature anthologies because of diversity and pc themes. Most of them are trite. I have become disgusted also at the obvious choices made by those who pick the titles for the children's book awards. Pick one for "PC" column A , another for "PC" column B, etc. Some of the books are excellent and others are there simply because they are the only ones to fill the slot in "PC" column C. Getting really cynical in my old age.
Katie, I guess you were referring to me? Anyway, thanks for the suggestions. Always need new ideas to keep the kids reading.
I think the problem is that it's like urine in a swimming pool: to the reviewer, any 'rah-rah' patriotism destroys a novel. So you can't have a bit of both.
I think people who love their country, no matter what country it is, understand that their country occasionally screws up, or isn't really the best at everything, and so forth. The difference is we don't believe you get better at your flaws by whining about them or painting yourself as 'just as bad' as everyone else. You rally, and you rally by cheering.
You must be logged in to post a comment.