<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 17 Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EnchiladaEddie</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-3180280</link>
		<dc:creator>EnchiladaEddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-3180280</guid>
		<description>That abstinence scene was a two-fer for conservatives.  Not only do we witness a refreshing unHollywood instance of a main character&#039;s heartfelt argument for teenage abstinence, but we&#039;re also treated to a funny caricature of a jaded, cynical, liberal puke of a public high school teacher, resembling (quite appropriately) Margaret Cho! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That abstinence scene was a two-fer for conservatives.  Not only do we witness a refreshing unHollywood instance of a main character&#39;s heartfelt argument for teenage abstinence, but we&#39;re also treated to a funny caricature of a jaded, cynical, liberal puke of a public high school teacher, resembling (quite appropriately) Margaret Cho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is This What 17 Year Olds Need to be Taught Again and Again and Again&#8230;? &#171; I&#8217;ll Follow the Sun</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-509318</link>
		<dc:creator>Is This What 17 Year Olds Need to be Taught Again and Again and Again&#8230;? &#171; I&#8217;ll Follow the Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-509318</guid>
		<description>[...] Again has been hailed as &#8220;a big deal&#8221; and a &#8220;nice movie&#8221; , primarily becase it stands as &#8221; openly and sincerely in favor of teenage abstinence.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Again has been hailed as &#8220;a big deal&#8221; and a &#8220;nice movie&#8221; , primarily becase it stands as &#8221; openly and sincerely in favor of teenage abstinence.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo_</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1148406</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1148406</guid>
		<description>Amber - 
 
I can&#039;t speak to the film because I did not see it. But I did read the first book and I couldn&#039;t agree with you more! Even though they were not sleeping together, it was all about an obsessive lust filled relationship. I had heard this book was so sweet and innocent, but even though there&#039;s no actual sex, it&#039;s all about the lust of what they can&#039;t have. (And as you said, the only thing stopping them is the death thing, not any desire on the part of either one of them to remain abstinent. 
 
I cannot imagine why parents would want their younger kids reading it, let alone their teens. (As if they are not already obsessed enough with sex!) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amber &#8211; </p>
<p>I can&#39;t speak to the film because I did not see it. But I did read the first book and I couldn&#39;t agree with you more! Even though they were not sleeping together, it was all about an obsessive lust filled relationship. I had heard this book was so sweet and innocent, but even though there&#39;s no actual sex, it&#39;s all about the lust of what they can&#39;t have. (And as you said, the only thing stopping them is the death thing, not any desire on the part of either one of them to remain abstinent. </p>
<p>I cannot imagine why parents would want their younger kids reading it, let alone their teens. (As if they are not already obsessed enough with sex!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1148270</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1148270</guid>
		<description>I highly disagree about Leonardo, actually - have you seen Blood Diaomond? - but I also have to point out that Twilight is not, at heart, promoting teenage abstinence. While I&quot;m really glad to hear that 17 Again does - what a rare turn! - what Twilight does is instead take a different angle in portraying teenagers and teenage lives as sex-obsessed - Bella can&#039;t sleep with Edward because if she does, he&#039;ll kill her. But there&#039;s absolutely nothing to suggest that she WOULDn&#039;t sleep with him if she could - in fact, in one of the scenes in the movie, if you remember, only his control over his blood-lust and his fear of killing her stops them. Twilight, in my opinion, is actually even MORE sex-obsessed than most other teen films - because much, if not most, of the romance/romantic tension is created by their physical tension and the boundaries they&#039;re forced to stay within. Because they CAN&#039;T sleep together, they are all the more frenetically lust-driven, especially Bella. I&#039;d say that it&#039;s very dangerous to tout Twilight as a sample of what teenagers need to see, particularly in terms of how it deals with sex.  
 
Thank you for the review, however - it was quite interesting :)  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly disagree about Leonardo, actually &#8211; have you seen Blood Diaomond? &#8211; but I also have to point out that Twilight is not, at heart, promoting teenage abstinence. While I&quot;m really glad to hear that 17 Again does &#8211; what a rare turn! &#8211; what Twilight does is instead take a different angle in portraying teenagers and teenage lives as sex-obsessed &#8211; Bella can&#39;t sleep with Edward because if she does, he&#39;ll kill her. But there&#39;s absolutely nothing to suggest that she WOULDn&#39;t sleep with him if she could &#8211; in fact, in one of the scenes in the movie, if you remember, only his control over his blood-lust and his fear of killing her stops them. Twilight, in my opinion, is actually even MORE sex-obsessed than most other teen films &#8211; because much, if not most, of the romance/romantic tension is created by their physical tension and the boundaries they&#39;re forced to stay within. Because they CAN&#39;T sleep together, they are all the more frenetically lust-driven, especially Bella. I&#39;d say that it&#39;s very dangerous to tout Twilight as a sample of what teenagers need to see, particularly in terms of how it deals with sex.  </p>
<p>Thank you for the review, however &#8211; it was quite interesting <img src='http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1139794</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1139794</guid>
		<description>Did you read the review? 
 
He said he felt that Efron had some masculinity. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read the review? </p>
<p>He said he felt that Efron had some masculinity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Leigh</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1246758</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1246758</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, John, you have a choice between reviewing a Zac Efron or a Russell Crowe movie -- and you pick the &quot;dreamy&quot; High School Musical metrosexual?  Somebody needs 8 hours of Clint Eastwood films, stat! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#39;s see, John, you have a choice between reviewing a Zac Efron or a Russell Crowe movie &#8212; and you pick the &quot;dreamy&quot; High School Musical metrosexual?  Somebody needs 8 hours of Clint Eastwood films, stat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MovieBob</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1133862</link>
		<dc:creator>MovieBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1133862</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the &quot;yesteryear?&quot; These people are largely in the SAME BASIC AGE GROUP. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s with the &quot;yesteryear?&quot; These people are largely in the SAME BASIC AGE GROUP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MovieBob</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1311194</link>
		<dc:creator>MovieBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1311194</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the &quot;yesteryear?&quot; These people are largely in the SAME BASIC AGE GROUP. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s with the &quot;yesteryear?&quot; These people are largely in the SAME BASIC AGE GROUP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MorganLR</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1133810</link>
		<dc:creator>MorganLR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1133810</guid>
		<description>Having seen the trailers to 17 Again, the only reason I think Zac Efron might be good in that film is because when I see him talk and act, he reminds me of Matthew Perry.  Because Perry, of course, plays Mike as an adult, to have Efron act like Perry in this film works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having seen the trailers to 17 Again, the only reason I think Zac Efron might be good in that film is because when I see him talk and act, he reminds me of Matthew Perry.  Because Perry, of course, plays Mike as an adult, to have Efron act like Perry in this film works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erica loves zac &#60;3</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/04/17/review-17-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1247414</link>
		<dc:creator>erica loves zac &#60;3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=109114#comment-1247414</guid>
		<description>i. love. zac. :] 
 
 
and i loved  this movie. it&#039;s great to see zac (mmm... zac &lt;3) in a more serious movie (not that this movie was serious... but you know, it&#039;s not high school musical or hairspray, it&#039;s all acting).  
 
but some of the scenes were a bit creepy when you think about it. (21-year-old zac kissing 38-year-old leslie? yuck... and michelle trachtenberg hitting on her dad? double yuck.... [yes, i know she doesn&#039;t know, but still, how awkward :/...]) 
 
overall, though, i was repeating over and over again to my friend &quot;he&#039;s so hot! he&#039;s so hot! he&#039;s sooooooooooooooooooooo hotttttt!!&quot; (you get the idea) 
 
and i think she may have gotten a little annoyed :] 
 
love, 
erica (who loves zac &lt;3) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i. love. zac. :] </p>
<p>and i loved  this movie. it&#39;s great to see zac (mmm&#8230; zac &lt;3) in a more serious movie (not that this movie was serious&#8230; but you know, it&#39;s not high school musical or hairspray, it&#39;s all acting).  </p>
<p>but some of the scenes were a bit creepy when you think about it. (21-year-old zac kissing 38-year-old leslie? yuck&#8230; and michelle trachtenberg hitting on her dad? double yuck&#8230;. [yes, i know she doesn&#39;t know, but still, how awkward :/...]) </p>
<p>overall, though, i was repeating over and over again to my friend &quot;he&#39;s so hot! he&#39;s so hot! he&#39;s sooooooooooooooooooooo hotttttt!!&quot; (you get the idea) </p>
<p>and i think she may have gotten a little annoyed :] </p>
<p>love,<br />
erica (who loves zac &lt;3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

