Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: 2008, best picture nominee, Frost/Nixon, Milk, Slumdog Millionaire, the curious case of benjamin button, The Reader
Posted Jan 25th 2009 at 5:17 am in Entertainment |
3021336 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fjjmnolte%2F2009%2F01%2F25%2F2008-best-picture-nominee-open-discussion-thread%2F2008+Best+Picture+Nominee+Open+Discussion+Thread2009-01-25+13%3A17%3A36John+Noltehttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D30213
Conservatives often talk about what they don’t like about Hollywood. That’s okay, but it’s not productive. Maybe it’s time we talked about what we do like? More to the point, let’s point out when Hollywood has gotten it right. And that brings me to the...







36 Comments
When I first heard that The Reader, this strange movie that I'd barely heard of, had gotten the fifth slot, I was surprised. Then I found out that it was about the Holocaust and Kate Winslet having sex with a teenager. Hell, if the boy had been retarded, it would've been a shoe-in for the win.
With these nominees the Oscars quickly becomes irrelevant, as does the entire Sunday night political awards show. Who cares.
I’ve seen three of these and in my opinion Gran Torino is far superior. I have not talked to anyone who did not think it was fabulous.
If Hollywood seeks to remain relevant it had better begin paying attention and stop giving us this sicko and political propaganda as art, or it may wind up with no audience.
Sorry, what was that? Who? What?
Titov,
For what my two cents is worth I'll just say that I loved the film and have enjoyed watching it several times over again now that it's on DVD. I also think the Oscar snub is pretty insulting given how good the movie is. That said, however, it's not above criticism by any means and I think there is definitely something to what you've said here. My feeling about the movie is that it is a bit over-stuffed. There's just too much going on to do justice to the whole Two-Face subplot. We don't really get to know Dent well enough as a character to know whether or not he'd snap like he did or even to make much of an emotional connection to him. And to focus on this subplot and do it right would require pretty much throwing out the ferry climax I think. It is admittedly a bit of a distraction from Two-Face's rampage. So I tend to agree with you that the movie was unfocused at the end – trying to do two things at once when it should have only been trying to do one thing well.
Ben Button was about 3000 hours long, well at least it felt that way. I hated it.
I won’t see The Reader on principle.
I won’t make the same mistake with Milk as I did with Brokeback Mountain (which was 18 different kinds of terrible).
Slumdog Millionaire looks depressing.
Frost/Nixon I’m completely apathetic about.
The best movie this year was The Dark Knight. Period.
Titov, I can pretty well guarantee the majority of the movies you mentioned has at least one completely inappropriate, completely tacked on, completely out of left field “Those Damn Republican” moments. That’s what frustrates even more. Its easy to avoid preachy movies, but even supposedly politically neutral movies sideswipe you with leftist BS.
Slumdog is the winner. I can see Penn winning for Milk. I hope Downey wins for supporting.
Neocon? Gasp! Comrade TITOV has found me out.
I had a good twenty year run without missing the Oscars, until Chris Rock hosted…then Michael Moore shot his mouth off…then Jon Stewart hosted…maybe I’ll watch this year, although the standing ovations for the mere mention of Obama’s name might get old after a while. And I’ll agree with Dark Eden, nothing worst than sitting down to something you think might be unpolitical, only to be slapped with a Republican/Conservative slam…”Transformers” and “Anchorman” just two that come to mind (although “Transformers” was all kind of suck, and “Anchorman” was hilarious until the finale).
Terrible field, and everyone knows it. Milk is the best film, and I don’t think it would make my top 15. None of the others would crack my top 20.
I haven’t seen The Reader. For all I know, it’s a masterpiece. But look at it.
The Holocaust.
Illiteracy.
Underage sex.
Harvey Weinstein.
Gee, why did that film get nominated?
My dream field:
Man on Wire
Rachel Getting Married
The Dark Knight
The Wrestler
Entre Les Murs (The Class)
Just because you didn’t understand the last 20 minutes of TDK doesn’t mean it was unfocused or poorly made.
I think what the left really finds objectionable about the TDK is that it illustrated the basic goodness of humanity–a tenet of the right. The real moral dilemma of the film was set up on the ferry boats not in warrantless wiretapping.
In the end, goodness prevailed. bWhat’s unfocused about that?
Titov, I’m just going to ask you to be courteous, make your points, and don’t throw anyone under the bus. I’m a dinosaur, but I actually think these comment sections CAN exist without the venom.
I disagree with you (and I’m not going to call you names). The Dark Knight deserves the nom in my opinion for the fact that it is a GAME-CHANGER. Nolan deserves a director’s nom because of the outstanding work he did to take a comic book story and make it larger, more compelling, more (yes) thought-provoking. I think of other movies that did not get nominations in the past (Singin’ in the Rain, 2001-A Space Odyssey, The Searchers to name three) that to this day are milestone pieces of cinema. HOWARD THOMPSON nailed in earlier in the commentary: these other movies will be forgotten (like CHIGAGO, The Turning Point, Julia), but The Dark Knight will have a shelf-life for a long, long time. Art and commercial success are not mutually-exclusive.
No name-calling, Titov. Just a different take.
Now God Bless You,
Chris
Chris E. and John Locke already pointed out the errors in To Dark Eden’s comment. Unfortunately, both were too polite to point out how TDE was criticizing people for not having seen movies before complaining about their “damn Republicans” moments and yet gets important facts wrong from a movie he or she is criticizing.
Anyway, we all don’t have to personally see a movie to know whether it contains one of those “damn Republicans” moments. Reviewers, and others who comment on sites like this, will point out such lefty cheap shots to forewarn others. A good example was the extended discussion over on Dirty Harry’s Place over the “stay the course” business in Wall-E. Like me, I’m sure a lot of folks saw the movie even knowing the shot was coming.
I plan to skip The Reader and maybe this week I’ll have a large meal and try to make it through Button. It’ll be Slumdog. Not necessarily a new story (will the poor boy get rich & find his dream girl??), but told in a highly original way. I enjoyed Milk immensely, but I truly hope Mickey Rourke gets best actor, and if not him Frank Langella. I don’t think Frost/Nixon was a hatchet job, but it certainly is a ’small’ film compared to the others. Russ–the ferryboat bit to me in TDK was a retread of themes already told in the film as well as repeated later. (The Joker is crazy evil, and sometimes sacrifices must be made for the greater good) And I really don’t think TDK could’ve made all that money if bitter leftists had hated/avoided it. It had incredibly wide appeal, but I’m with those who felt it was way too long. I think the Academy just can’t bring itself to nominate a superhero movie. And Mitchum–Batman not gay? He wears a skintight leather suit with a cape, lives in a cave, (often with a handsome youth), is EXTREMELY well groomed, is seen in public with a succession of beautiful women who can only be called “beards,” and has NEVER had a long term relationship with any woman…
See all 5 pics–Slumdog is the best of the 5.
I haven’s seen any of those. Should I have?
None of these films will make me watch the telecast to see them win. Certainly none of them has had enough appeal to make me get to a theater.
I may even skip the live-blogging and drunk-blogging this year.
Gran Torino is one of the worst movies I’ve seen in a long time. Let me count the ways:
spoiler alert
Sue: Hey, Wally.
Walt: Listen you gook, chink, slant, Dragon Lady, don’t call me Wally.
Sue: Tee hee hee.
And it gets worse.
Walt is an old stick-in-the-mud who just can’t seem to get with the program and accept that his new neighbors whack off chickens’ heads in their back yard.
Walt is your “typical” war hero who, fifty years later, can’t let go of the conflict. Even though thousands of American military men and women have come home to marry and raise thousands of children who grow up to be normal, prosperous, God fearing, grateful adults, Walt isn’t one of them. Are we privy to the cause of Walt’s sons & their wives & granddaughter’s shallow, self-centeredness, or are we not-so-subtly led to believe that it’s our culture, not Walt the father, that produces avaricious, manipulative simps (caused by Reagan’s and Bush’s greed, no doubt).
His comfort comes at his local VA lodge where he and his racist fellow vets tell anti-Semitic jokes juxtaposed with the backdrop of red, white, and blue while they drink their beer in Old Glory glasses. Get the picture? Get the connection there?
Now, because the next door neighbors are nicer (except Grandma who clings to her cultural values, deriding Thao for doing women’s work, washing dishes; and complains that her widowed daughter (Thao’s mother) doesn’t find a husband asap because Thao needs a father’s influence, instead of lauding the virtues of single motherhood), Walt pursues the validation of his existence via a new, fresh family instead of making amends with his own. And Grandma gets to keep her arrogant disapproval of the mean ole guy next door.
I would like to have seen Walt examine his role in creating his own circumstances. Our protagonist doesn’t grow, doesn’t gain wisdom. He just throws himself into another battle that ends in an over-the-top “suicide by gang member” escape.
Post-war American family values=bad.
New minority family values=good.
I vote for Slumdog Millionaire.
There is not one of these turkeys I want to watch.
After tonight, Slumdog Millionaire will have Critics Choice and Golden Globes for Picture, Director, and a SAG for Ensemble Acting. It HAS to be considered the favorite for Best Picture.
I’m getting quite jaded. I thought Slumdog was seriously not up to the hype. Just a patchwork of other films. I can understand why Indian people are upset. I’m also sick of the huge decibel sound tracks hurting my ears and the heavy handed yellow filter business.
Torino was overacted, simple minded and predictable, although I enjoyed the ending.
I lasted fifteen minutes into Tropic Thunder. It was geared for thirteen year old kids who have spent a little too much time under the ice. Getting sick and tired of the exploding gas can movies. At least Knight actually showed the gas drums. Leger was outstanding, but the rest, just more bubble gum pap. Same for like Iron man.
Same evening I caught Mr. Brooks and liked it a lot. Last great movie I caught was lives of others. They are coming few and far between these days.
Let me ask, Titov or other Dark Knight detractors …..
1) Are most of your concerns of a narraitve nature? Why did Batman do this? Why did Batman not do that? Where did that stack of money come from, etc.?
To me that’s narrative nitpicking. I admit it’s there, but compared to the thematic element of the writing, it’s of minor importance.
I’ll compare it to a film like Children of Men. That film has a ton of narrative issues. I oculd point out a few dozen. And in the end it doesn’t matter that much. Because it’s a film with its finger on the pulse of things.
I would say the same thing about The Dark Knight. I would probably say it even more emphatically about The Dark Knight.
I also think that the “third act is confusing” refrain ignores the first two hours of incredibly sustained intensity.
I still find the idea that TDK is a salute to right-wing beliefs ridiculous. Oh by the way, I’m a leftist and I loved it.
I’m curious too to see how some of you can think Frost/Nixon and Curious Case are un-American and extremely gay, and that’s why they were nominated for best picture.
Gran Torino i ghe best movie I saw for 2008 -
O – You may enjoy listening to Hugh Hewitt if he is in your area. He is a center-right talk show host. He used to work for Nixon in San Clemente (after his resignation) and was surprised to find that the movie was rather fair in history.
Very nice site. I enjoy your webcam the most. Beautiful scenery! Keep up the great work.
I’m still shocked that Gran Torino was completely snubbed. Now it’s official.. I’d like to thank the Academy for solidifying my belief that it’s nothing more than smoke and mirrors when it comes to rating talent, but a true political machine.
The only thing I know is that Leonardo DiCaprio was ROBBED. His performance in Revolutionary Road was PHENOMINAL. Whether you liked the movie or not, whether you like him or not, there is no denying that Leo DiCaprio has incredible talent.
Depressing movie, incredible acting from DiCaprio and Michael Shannon!
wow, so many movies to hate which I haven’t seen, so little time.
I saw “The Reader” yesterday. Is it an endorsement of pedophilia? No. Does it compromise the integrity of those who died or were subjected to the Holocaust? No. Is it Hollywood liberal propaganda? No. Go see a movie before you judge it. There is so much hate on this site, it’s disgusting.
And I liked The Dark Knight, but, come on, the final act was SLOPPY! And I haven’t seen Gran Tarino, but I certainly will.
Alright, let me just say first of all that I am sick to death of people saying how Depressing and dark “Slumdog Millionaire” is. It’s not, alright? Worse is hearing people say that after they’ve only seen the PREVIEWS!
SLUMDOG is an incredible film. And the best I’ve seen in decades. The direction is flawless and the story will have your eyes tearing up by the end. It isn’t just the best film of the year, it’s the best in a long, long time.
Get off Dark Knight already. I Absolutely LOVED that movie and believe that Ledger deserves an oscar without a doubt. But despite it being a pro-Bush statement, there are movies that are better.
And SLUMDOG is one of those movies. I loved Dark Knight and I loved Gran Torino, both of which were exemplary films. But neither of them can hold a candle to SLUMDOG.
It is quite simply, a beautiful film with an incredible script, directing job done by Boyle, and outstanding performances by all actors included. It is not dark. It’s not depressing. It’s a film filled with hope and love.
This year, when I read about the Oscar nominations, I was kinda stunned to realize that I had not seen ONE of the films with a major nomination.
Most of them look like ‘wait for DVD’ (if then) for me, a far better deal for my time and money. (Movie theatres which don’t offer a $6 matinee – even @ 10 AM – won’t get my money. How much do they make off all the empty seats I always see in the daytime showings?)
Slumdog Millionaire looks like it could be a good date movie.
If you’ve seen it, would you recommend it as such?
The Oscar awards are ridiculous because they pick just one nominee per category, as if you can compare five different things and pronounce one of them “best”. The Oscars could take a small step toward validity if they changed to a practice of handing out awards for as many nominees as were simply deemed “excellent”. [And even then, come on, for example, some performances owe so much to the writing, editing, etc.]
The complaints about ‘X never won an Oscar’ are usually silly, because these complaints (usually) tacitly accept the silly policy of choosing just one nominee per category and calling that one “best”.
Isn’t it obvious the degree to which Oscars for Best Film (and others)are often awarded on a basis of the voters making a statement about how admirable they wish to appear, and/or stating which social issues they feel strongly about?
Another change to make the Oscar awards more respectable would be to wait five years after the films came out to decide what was “best” that year. But of course that would not help the big pros make more money.
FYI, I made these Oscar comments about 2 months ago
on Dirty Harry’s Place website.
IMHO, Dark Knight was too long (plodding), complicated, and gloomy to be an enjoyable entertainment (unlike, say, Iorn Man), yet too much like a comic book to be effective as adult drama. A big ‘neither-nor’.
FYI, I liked Gran Torino very much.
A few comments….
The Dark Knight was one of the best summertime blockbuster popcorn movies I’ve ever seen. It’s also one of the highest grossing of all time. I love Chris Nolan, thought The Prestige was awesome, but I don’t know if this movie deserves an Oscar nom or not. It’s on the fringe for me.
However, Benjamin Button got WAY too much praise, as did Milk and The Reader. Milk was going to get the publicity for obvious reasons(Prop 8 passing and Hollywood needing to glorify gays)
Gran Torino and The Wrestler both deserve best picture nominations. Clint Eastwood wouldn’t have beat out Mickey Rourke for best actor, but he should have been nominated over Sean Penn.
Slumdog Millionaire was the best movie of the year by far. The thing hit on all cylinders. Acting was great, dialog was great, cinematography was outstanding. Storyline was brilliant, and had emotional highs and lows throughout the film. The soundtrack was even great. This is just one of those films that WORKS, and it works for everyone involved. It has to win best picture, because it IS the best picture. I usually avoid the quickly “hyped” films like this one, but considering it was on the brink of a “straight to dvd” release this past spring, I like this underdog story. And there is no way Milk, Ben Button, or The Reader deserve it. FROST/NIXON was good but not great.
again, The Wrestler and Gran Torino have a right to be pissed. TDK didn’t get “snubbed” as much as people seem to think, and Slumdog Millionaire is a legit Best Picture film.
Инвестиционная компания Globol Invest предлагает вам свои следующие инвестиционные пакеты:
План Свободный План – минимальный вклад 20 $, начисление прибыли каждый день, 7 дней в неделю, 1,4 % от депозита.
План Форекс – минимальный вклад 30$, начисление прибыли по рабочим дням, 5 дней в неделю, начисление прибыли производится по итогам торговой сессии, и варьируются от 1% до 5%.
План V.I.P. – минимальный вклад 1000$, начисление прибыли каждый день, 7 дней в неделю, 2,5% от депозита.
Приглашайте своих друзей и знакомых и получайте 5% по первому уровню и 3% по второму.
Подробности на сайте компании:http://globolinvest.com
Thank you. I read herelots of valuable sentences. Greetings from Poland.
[...] – January 25th, 2009 at 5:41 amGran Torino has my vote. Then Dark Knight. Neither w source: 2008 Best Picture Nominee Open Discussion Thread, Big [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.