Comments on: Stand Up Notes from Flyover Country: Woodstock Revisited Revisited

By: garment daily business reports

garment daily business reports — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:43:01 +0000

Sources…

[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

By: Baby Boomer Living » Blog Archive » Stand Up Notes from Flyover Country: Woodstock Revisited Revisited by Jeffrey Jena

Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:39:23 +0000

[...] Continue Reading: [...]

By: talleyhoe

talleyhoe — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:43:28 +0000

saw a report from the park service several years ago, saying that the mall after 'earth day' was the worst clean-up project they had.

By: Consrvativ_KDH

Consrvativ_KDH — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 05:48:46 +0000

Wuck Foodstock

By: El_Gordo

El_Gordo — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:35:40 +0000

Learn some history. It was absolutely winnable. It was badly led for a while, but we would have muddled through as we usually do. It was a war of choice, so you can argue that maybe we should not have gotten involved. But the cost of losing it by choice was what really damaged the country. And those soldiers are still dead and those who spit on them are still sanctimonious assholes.

By: bert

bert — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:01:30 +0000

I'll go where ever I want. You think everyone who was against the war was spitting on vietnam vets, even the ones who were drafted. talk about painting everyone with one brush. You're an idiot

By: Thomas_L

Thomas_L — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:32:43 +0000

Too many? Maybe you should hang out with better and smarter folks. I hate to break up your imaginary world but there are, of course, much and many worse things than people like me but thanks for that wonderful and informative piece of … whatever. Have a beer.

By: wonder_all

wonder_all — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:10:21 +0000

I've known too many people ruin their lives by being stoned all the time. Nothing worse than an old stoner.

By: Thomas_L

Thomas_L — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:26:44 +0000

No, although cannabis prohibition has led to the mess we're in, I don't believe they all should be legalized. Methamphetamines especially are a huge problem. Decriminalization of cannabis might be a good first step towards normalizing things, however. Doing the same old thing is a sure way to continue to make it worse. There is too much money involved in illegal drugs to easily fix this mess. The huge amounts if money drive all aspects of the "war on drugs". No one from corner dealer, to the cops and the politicians is immune to the lure of easy cash. We know how prohibition did that with alcohol but we can't see how it has done the same thing, only much worse with drugs?

By: Thomas_L

Thomas_L — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:10:48 +0000

My argument. You've already dismissed what you think it might be but I'll try anyway. Safe? Interesting. Safe as anything we allow adults to do with their lives, I'll wager but safety, although I would argue that it is safer than beer, isn't my point or the book's. It mostly talks about the history and futility of prohibition. It makes a good arguement that the "war on drugs" has caused more damage that the mere use of cannibis could ever dream of causing. It argues persuasively that the prohibition of cannabis has led to the huge criminal problems we now have where drugs are concerned. It outlines the government commissions that have been done regarding cannabis from the India Hemp Commission to Canada's Le Dain Commission to Consumer Reports findings. You might be interested in what they all decided. It details the industrial and practical uses for hemp and all that, as well.
Finally, (not in the book) do we realize how we force so many, especially the young into the camp of the commies by this one little thing? Misinformation on one thing can lead to the gulping down of disinformation on the other.
Something to think about.