<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;60 Minutes&#8217;: Let Me Count the Liberal Clichés</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chaka</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1166050</link>
		<dc:creator>chaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1166050</guid>
		<description>debate the 2nd amendment? it seems pretty clear to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>debate the 2nd amendment? it seems pretty clear to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gun Control and Other Liberal Hogwash, through &#8216;60 Minutes&#8217; Eyes &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-509442</link>
		<dc:creator>Gun Control and Other Liberal Hogwash, through &#8216;60 Minutes&#8217; Eyes &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-509442</guid>
		<description>[...] a bit of Jena&#8217;s droll commentary: ‘60 Minutes’: Let Me Count the Liberal Clichés: &#8220;I wasn’t disappointed. First up, a piece about a Pentagon program for advanced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a bit of Jena&#8217;s droll commentary: ‘60 Minutes’: Let Me Count the Liberal Clichés: &#8220;I wasn’t disappointed. First up, a piece about a Pentagon program for advanced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1248186</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1248186</guid>
		<description>Hey bro, you set me straight.  I am an idiot, which I forgot to mention, although it seemed to come through on my postings pretty well!  LOL!   I&#039;m glad I&#039;ve got much smarter people like you to set me straight!  You weren&#039;t even that condescending about it! Good for you.   
 
You can change the world........one person at a time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey bro, you set me straight.  I am an idiot, which I forgot to mention, although it seemed to come through on my postings pretty well!  LOL!   I&#039;m glad I&#039;ve got much smarter people like you to set me straight!  You weren&#039;t even that condescending about it! Good for you.   </p>
<p>You can change the world&#8230;&#8230;..one person at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbgb</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1149906</link>
		<dc:creator>cbgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1149906</guid>
		<description>Stopped watching &quot;60 Minutes&quot;!  Heck, I stopped watching television.  Best thing I&#039;ve ever done.  (Sorry, TV execs.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stopped watching &quot;60 Minutes&quot;!  Heck, I stopped watching television.  Best thing I&#039;ve ever done.  (Sorry, TV execs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinapus</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1180402</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinapus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1180402</guid>
		<description>You might want to try clicking the correct reply button. I dislike coming to these threads and finding you&#039;re responding to something someone else wrote. 
 
Of course, having read Jerry&#039;s comment, I find you presuming things he did not say. Feel relieved: no one is going to force you to have a gun, but I guess you&#039;re one of the &quot;if it&#039;s not forbidden it&#039;s mandatory&quot; sort of folks who have a problem with the concept of choice. Oh, and life isn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;Fight Club&lt;/i&gt; so try dropping the childish &quot;I thought you were tough&quot; rationales for whether or not you might own a gun. You might also want to look up the term &quot;projection&quot; and ponder a bit. 
 
Oh and this is trite: 
&lt;i&gt;Also, If I call the police, I bet you a million dollars that they will show up at my house because it is their job.&lt;/i&gt; 
 
Will you be able to collect the money? As the slogan says: &quot;When seconds count, the police are minutes away.&quot; 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a-human-right.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.a-human-right.com/&lt;/a&gt;  
(Full of shiny photos since you seem more driven by emotion than by logic. There are words too, though you will have to set aside your prejudices and click a link labeled with a concept you seem to find hard to comprehend. The link that matches your beliefs leads to a nifty poll.) 
 
Puzzle it over. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to try clicking the correct reply button. I dislike coming to these threads and finding you&#039;re responding to something someone else wrote. </p>
<p>Of course, having read Jerry&#039;s comment, I find you presuming things he did not say. Feel relieved: no one is going to force you to have a gun, but I guess you&#039;re one of the &quot;if it&#039;s not forbidden it&#039;s mandatory&quot; sort of folks who have a problem with the concept of choice. Oh, and life isn&#039;t <i>Fight Club</i> so try dropping the childish &quot;I thought you were tough&quot; rationales for whether or not you might own a gun. You might also want to look up the term &quot;projection&quot; and ponder a bit. </p>
<p>Oh and this is trite:<br />
<i>Also, If I call the police, I bet you a million dollars that they will show up at my house because it is their job.</i> </p>
<p>Will you be able to collect the money? As the slogan says: &quot;When seconds count, the police are minutes away.&quot; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.a-human-right.com/" target="_blank">http://www.a-human-right.com/</a><br />
(Full of shiny photos since you seem more driven by emotion than by logic. There are words too, though you will have to set aside your prejudices and click a link labeled with a concept you seem to find hard to comprehend. The link that matches your beliefs leads to a nifty poll.) </p>
<p>Puzzle it over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1248362</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1248362</guid>
		<description>Why are you so angry?  If I disagree with you on one point, why am I an evil Liberal?  For gun lovers, you are pretty scared of a pantywaist.  If you&#039;re so tough, why do you need a gun to protect yourselves?  Oh, that&#039;s right, it&#039;s because other people have guns, so you need guns, so everybody should have guns.   
 
Also, If I call the police, I bet you a million dollars that they will show up at my house because it is their job.  The case referred to earlier saying that the police do not have a duty to protect you is one in which the Supreme Court ruled that the gov&#039;t could not be sued in a 1983 suit for not enforcing a restraining order.  It is quite a stretch to say that the police will not protect you due to that ruling.  I don&#039;t know about you, but the police department in my city is still fully operational.  And another thing, as long as the Sup. Ct is constituted as it currently is, gun rights will not be limited further.  Even if Obama gets a law passed, this court will strike it down -- judicial activism is great when it&#039;s in your favor, right?   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you so angry?  If I disagree with you on one point, why am I an evil Liberal?  For gun lovers, you are pretty scared of a pantywaist.  If you&#39;re so tough, why do you need a gun to protect yourselves?  Oh, that&#39;s right, it&#39;s because other people have guns, so you need guns, so everybody should have guns.   </p>
<p>Also, If I call the police, I bet you a million dollars that they will show up at my house because it is their job.  The case referred to earlier saying that the police do not have a duty to protect you is one in which the Supreme Court ruled that the gov&#39;t could not be sued in a 1983 suit for not enforcing a restraining order.  It is quite a stretch to say that the police will not protect you due to that ruling.  I don&#39;t know about you, but the police department in my city is still fully operational.  And another thing, as long as the Sup. Ct is constituted as it currently is, gun rights will not be limited further.  Even if Obama gets a law passed, this court will strike it down &#8212; judicial activism is great when it&#39;s in your favor, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamsch</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1148858</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1148858</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is a very good critique of the episode. I really enjoy 60 min, and though they certainly have a bias, it&#039;s not like the author here was without a bias. Should we only seek information from those who think like we do? Were there any good points made in the piece about gun control? I think so. The guy who bought the guns was just showing how easy it is to get them. How does arresting him solve the bigger problem of people getting assault rifles without id? Was that just leftist loony talk? I wish this author let his own bias shine a little less brightly.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think this is a very good critique of the episode. I really enjoy 60 min, and though they certainly have a bias, it&#39;s not like the author here was without a bias. Should we only seek information from those who think like we do? Were there any good points made in the piece about gun control? I think so. The guy who bought the guns was just showing how easy it is to get them. How does arresting him solve the bigger problem of people getting assault rifles without id? Was that just leftist loony talk? I wish this author let his own bias shine a little less brightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stergeye</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1148562</link>
		<dc:creator>Stergeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1148562</guid>
		<description>Did you ever notice how trolls always seem to aim at your ankles?  Guess being humor-challenged ruins your aim. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever notice how trolls always seem to aim at your ankles?  Guess being humor-challenged ruins your aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinapus</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1271406</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinapus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1271406</guid>
		<description>Wow, you&#039;re just full of gun grabber cliches, aren&#039;t you? 
 
Going for the &quot;overwhelm with talking points&quot; strategy? 
 
Oh, btw. You really need to read the VPC/Brady Bunch talking points manual more carefully. It&#039;s assault WEAPON, i.e., semi-automatic weapon that&#039;s all black and military-looking so it&#039;s easy to fool people like you into thinking they&#039;re a horrifying (full-automatic) menace that you&#039;ll want the nice government to make go away. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you&#039;re just full of gun grabber cliches, aren&#039;t you? </p>
<p>Going for the &quot;overwhelm with talking points&quot; strategy? </p>
<p>Oh, btw. You really need to read the VPC/Brady Bunch talking points manual more carefully. It&#039;s assault WEAPON, i.e., semi-automatic weapon that&#039;s all black and military-looking so it&#039;s easy to fool people like you into thinking they&#039;re a horrifying (full-automatic) menace that you&#039;ll want the nice government to make go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Shaw</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjena/2009/04/23/sixty-minutes-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-1208974</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=105698#comment-1208974</guid>
		<description>When did 60 Minutes get hijacked by flaming liberals? I don&#039;t know. I just know I have not watched 60 Minutes in years.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did 60 Minutes get hijacked by flaming liberals? I don&#039;t know. I just know I have not watched 60 Minutes in years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

