Comments on: So Goes California, So Goes the Nation

By: garment news daily

garment news daily — Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:12:00 +0000

Sources…

[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

By: San Francisco Citizens: Did You Vote for This Extravagant Wi-Fi Installation at SF Bus Stops? « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:34:56 +0000

[...] Obamacare for illegal aliens and Nice “work” if you can get it James Hudnall, Big Hollywood: So Goes California, So Goes the Nation Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Hey, Arnold, we are not your ATM! California Chronicle: Garamendi Says the [...]

By: Bigger Bandage for California’s Bleeding Budget: Financial Hemorrhaging Slowed Down, but $56.8-Billion Drop Reported for CA Pension Fund « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:42:16 +0000

[...] cash and California elected officials’ pay will be cut 18% James Hudnall, Big Hollywood: So Goes California, So Goes the Nation Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Hey, Arnold, we are not your ATM! and 10,000 workers in Mexifornia to be [...]

By: California: Big Banks Tell Gov. Schwarzenegger No More IOUs « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:57:33 +0000

[...] and What George Will missed: The decrepit state of the California GOP James Hudnall, Big Hollywood: So Goes California, So Goes the Nation Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Hey, Arnold, we are not your ATM! and 10,000 workers in Mexifornia to be [...]

By: California Such a Financial Mess, ‘IOU’ Notes Will Be Given to Vendors Who Are Owed Money « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:09:35 +0000

By: California Doesn’t Get It: Cuts Tax Deductions for Children, Illegal Aliens Trained for Jobs They Can’t Legally Hold « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:32:48 +0000

By: Dogness

Dogness — Sat, 23 May 2009 06:48:31 +0000

I am a bit late, but I have to ask this question:

How could California's elected state representatives have proposed a budget deal that was just rejected by the 2/3rds of the voters. Exactly who are these people representing?

By: El_Gordo

El_Gordo — Fri, 22 May 2009 09:52:51 +0000

Why is housing so expensive that teachers have to be assigned "cheap zones" (which is in itself the sign of a centrally planned and therefore inefficient economy). Teachers aren´t that low on the income ladder. Why doesn´t the market clear? Could it be that new construction has been intentionally restricted by politicians? I don´t know the answer, but usually such a development doesn´t just happen.

By: reasonjester

reasonjester — Fri, 22 May 2009 04:52:06 +0000

Good points all, Cherie. The one I hate, and which Hayek laments in The Road to Serfdom, is the "conservative" mantle. Free marketers have nothing to do with European conservatives or Tories. I'm reading Alinsky now and he is lumping in American patriots in with "Tories." Idiotic, but a natural consequence of the right allowing the left to define them.

When called a conservative, a person should automatically rebut it and qualify that they are an American patriot. That scares the hell out of the left and shows them you're not messing around. When someone calls oneself liberal, rebut that they're not a liberal and then define it (Madison, Locke, Smith, e.g.). If progressive, ask which kind. The nationalist, religious, organic-statist, or socialist kind? We have to take the language back. I'm with you on that Cherie.

By: Cherie

Cherie — Thu, 21 May 2009 23:45:33 +0000

Let's stop calling it 'capitalism' – a term foisted upon us by Marx anyway.
Let's call it The Free Economy. Or Economic Freedom.
Let's change 'capital' to 'private property.'
Let's stop saying 'tax cuts' (which repetition has made automatic the addition of '…for the rich') and instead say 'keep your own money.'
The Left has had great success by controlling the language – new words, and new definitions for existing words. We need to learn how to play that game.