Political Correctness Must Die
by James HudnallIn the early 20th century Marxism seemed like a good idea to many of the poor and downtrodden the world over. It hadn’t yet resulted in the untimely deaths of more people than all the wars of the 20th century combined.
Even so, radicals then were as annoying and crazed as radicals now. So the people weren’t universally jumping on their bandwagon. The Marxists couldn’t flip governments without the masses. So they worked on a system to undermine unity in society. The old adage “United we stand, divided we fall” was on their mind. They had to divide the people in order to tear society apart and remake it their way. Thus, political correctness was born.
This documentary does an excellent job of telling its story. PC is designed by German Marxists of the Frankfurt School to destroy Western culture.
It should come as no surprise the the destruction of the family is one of its goals. And as it gained in prominence, its goals have been realized. The polarization of racial groups, and even of
the sexes is another.
That’s plenty of reason to see it die a horrible death. Marxists have murdered many times more people than the Nazis. They have destroyed the livelihoods of people the world over and imprisoned many millions in gulags and work camps. The last thing we want to do is let them win here or anywhere else.
While it may seem communism is dead, communism, socialism, fascism are all part of a many headed hydra called statism. These are political systems which are all about empowering the state as much as possible. They name they go under now is “progressive.”
Many progressives on the ground think they are fighting for equal rights and social justice. The progressive elites know better. They want power and control over people’s lives. Political correctness is a tool to accomplish these goals.
It should come as no surprise that the oldest Marxist states threw off Marxism because it doesn’t work, and went with their own version of capitalism. Almost every single former Soviet state went gleefully to capitalism. Russia even has a flat tax. That’s a pretty sad comment on where we are right now when their tax system is simple and ours is a bureaucratic nightmare.
Political Correctness is hated by just about anyone you meet. The only people driving it are leftists and government bureaucrats, who earn a living from it. Pardon my redundancy.
Here are five good reasons Political Correctness must die.
1. It’s censorship: Point blank, that’s what it is. It’s used mainly by people on the left to attack people on the right, but not the other way around. When Miss California, Carrie Prejean, politely said she thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, the PC thugs proceeded to try to destroy her life. But when Obama said it he was elected president. It’s used to accuse people of racism even when there is no racism involved, It’s not only a scare tactic, but also a career-destroying move. And it’s a thuggish weapon of intimidation.
2. It’s bigotry disguised as manners: You may think all those touchy-feely names they come up with for various special interest groups are more sensitive and empowering than the “mean” names of the past, but most of them are patronizing and they segregating. When you separate people into classes, it’s creating a kind of caste system. History has shown us that caste systems are used to suppress and marginalize people by putting them in special groups. The insidious thing about PC is it claims to treat people better when it really does the opposite. It implies that people in these groups are somehow lesser and weaker and must be “protected”, presumably by the government, and then implies that they are not being treated well by other groups (namely white males) which is an inherently racist argument.
3. It’s an attempt at mind control: The goal of PC always has been to segregate people into classes, destroy the family by marginalizing and polarizing people from traditional values and culture. It also tries to rebrand things to force people to think along a different path. You might think that’s a good thing if it makes people more tolerant. While our culture is more tolerant than it was in the past there is no proof or evidence PC had anything to do with it. The fact is, lying to people (which PC does) and trying to destroy a culture by effectively brainwashing people is downright…
4. Evil: The textbook definition of evil is that which is willfully and maliciously harmful to others. What else do you call something that is used to commit so much harm against people and a society as a whole. It has become a rampant monster that destroys lives, careers, and society. It’s used by creepy, selfish people to hurt others. Race-baiters we all know and despise have been using PC for years to try to extort money from business and government by making up racist claims. That’s nothing but a form of extortion.
5. Why should we do what some faceless creeps tell us?: Most of the time we were told what the new term for something is. In the ’60s we were told Negro is not acceptable anymore. We should say black even though Negro is merely the Spanish word for black. Then in the ’70s we were told to use “Afro-American” then later “African-American” even though that term is not only a mouthful it makes no sense. A lot of black Americans are simply Americans, many others are from the Caribbean. Or they are mixed race like our president. Who makes up these lame terms and why should we start saying them? Because “we’re supposed to” isn’t a reason, that’s more of a threat. Who says we have to? Why shouldn’t we say steward or stewardess instead of flight attendant? Because “they” say so? Why should we take directions from faceless entities who tell us what we can say? Why can’t we say whatever we want? Most of the terms these people come up with are retarded mentally challenged. See, they hyphenate you to separate you from the rest of us, We’re all part of the same country, but they want to make you feel aggrieved. Angry and unhappy people are easier to sway with propaganda.
So I’ve listed a few reasons why PC must die. I could go on, but the real question is, how do we kill the hydra? It’s not an easy monster to beat.
I have some ideas. I will share them in part 2.






Subscribe via RSS
195 Comments
Political correctness is about mind control, pure and simple. If you can keep people from speaking an idea, you kill the idea. This is a dirty, but very effective tool that must be fought.
How to kill political correctness. Good question. In an ideal world, we would just violate it. Over time, as more and more people violated it, it would simply cease to exist. Unfortunately, there are too many people on our side who will throw you to the wolves so that they can demonstrate their "tolerance." Those are the people who keep political correctness alive.
So how do we kill it? I think the only way to fight this fire is with fire. We need to use the same tactics they have used until it becomes untenable for either side to continue so that neither side is willing to use that tactic anymore (call it "mutually assured conversational destruction"). That's generally the only way to get the left to abandon a successful tactic.
Gee, the fascist misses the point again. Go bake something.
Stupid reply. Who are YOU to decide what's offensive to people? Our nannies, also known as the left are just watching out for us. But your one little sentence explains how liberals feel about everyone. That all the peons are stupid and have to be cared for and looked out for. By your idiotic sentence, you're assuming that bringing back cross burnings by the Democrat KKK will occur again. Everyone thank Auntie for looking out for us. What about the slurs, such as from Wanda Sykes, Janeane Garafalo? Do you mean those? How about the constant slurs against Christians from the likes of the weasel Bill Maher? Sounds like most of the abusive language has been coming from the left these days.
Where's the pie!!!!
excellent points. Political Correctness is actually cultural Marxism; it is meant to silence and intimidate, much like our pathetic pie provider… yes, by standing your ground amongst the Hissing Vipers of the Left knowing that your cause is righteous and just causes them to retreat back to the dark places they inhabit. The bromide that speaking your mind and standing on principle is somehow 'racist' or 'homophobic' is patently absurd…
Divide and rule is one of the oldest strategies in the book of statism.
I think the real only viable option is to use the forbidden words & not back down from the PC police.
As opposed to Christian slurs, Jewish slurs, military slurs, and family slurs. Never mind. Those are completely socially acceptable there in the troll cave and everywhere on the left. Have some pie, and go away.
Follow the yellow brick road to the Wizard to pick up your brain.
Your name should be IAMAFASCIST Auntie. It fits you and your ilk better.
I agree, however we must not the PC police define what is forbidden, and second, find out just who in the hell appointed these so called, police?
Antifascist's shtick: left-wing McCarthyism, ad hominem attacks, and straw man attacks in place of any logical debate or defense of potlical correctness and the doctrine of statism per se.
Antifascist and her/his ilk know they are working to destroy independent thought in the name of their dogma, so they make no effort to refute any of the sound arguments made in this article. Indeed, when progressives let their hair down they agree with most of the tenets of political correctness evaluated here, with the critical difference that the left sees elite rule, censorship, and social control as a good thing. Instead, they resort to baseless smears and personal attacks in an attempt to silence the opposition.
You know…..if you were any more ignorant than you appear to be, a government funded study would be have to be done to, determine your place in the evolutionary chain. Explain to me, in non-talking point language, how non-PC liguistical discourse is racist and homophobic. Stating the claim, with no factual evidence, doesn't cut it. Be persuasive! 80% of your final grade depends on it and next year, you can fall in with the second graders! It's win/win for you, poopsie!
Yeah, ……I fed the troll. I was really hopin' for a heapin' helpin' of Apple pie.
w/Vanillia Ice Cream………
I can't wait for the pie.
Define "homophobic" When you start telling people they have to violate their religious principles (prescribing abortion pills, forcing photographers to work at homosexual weddings and other such things) It is not homophobic to refuse such things. It is called practising religion and there is a reason it was the first one in the Bill of Rights. You guys want to control people, not just practice your deprived sex.
call it "mutually assured conversational destruction
damnit, Andrew! That's what I was going to post until I read it there. In all truth, your diatribe led right up to it.
Good man!
Let's start by building a fence (white picket preferable) around the entire country and declare the U.S. a "hate free" zone. We'll finance the fence by levying fines on anyone who makes any statement(s) against, or that can be construed as against, a homosexual's* right to marry. This will be a nice adjunct to our great leader's "stimulus" bill, and should bring in a nice chunk of change.
By the way, is there a fundamental right for a "Questioning" individual to marry another "Questioning" person, be they male or female? I'm guessing yes, but would like to hear from more liberal experts before coming to a final conclusion.
If Conservatives want to kill off political correctness, here's a good way to start: quit sending your alma mater donations every time there's a fundraising effort, and quit sending your children to state-funded schools. I love my alma mater, but until there is a sincere commitment to what we can largely call academic freedom, no more money from me (I"m not a big bucks booster, so they could care less). Many schools have divestment from Israel campaigns. Here's my idea: divest from universities. No protests, no editorials, none of that, just quit sending them money, and quit sending them asses to fill the seats.
So, where do you send you kids to get a quality education? I didn't say I have all the answers, but enriching the institutions that are the most responsible for the spread of PC seems quite silly, even if you love college football (which I do).
I like a good healthy dose of civil disobedience, sorta like the Marting Luther King model of intolerance – refusing to tolerate the status quo any longer.
I want racial and homophobic slurs to actually BE racial and homophobic slurs. Thanks to the PC Nazis, it's not just as socially unacceptable to disapprove of gay marriage as it is to call homosexuals "fags".
Calling people at Tea Parties "tea baggers" is perfectly okay, though.
I want racial and homophobic slurs to actually BE racial and homophobic slurs. Thanks to the PC Nazis, it's not just as socially unacceptable to disapprove of gay marriage as it is to call homosexuals "fags".
Calling people at Tea Parties "tea baggers" is perfectly okay, though.
Political correctness is defined as: deliberately avoiding offense: relating to or supporting the use of language or conduct that deliberately avoids giving offense, e.g. on the basis of ethnic origin or sexual orientation.
We are always hearing of these agendas that are meant to create empathy for some type of victim. If we turned the political correctness on them it would be harder for them to argue their points. Have the very people they are claiming to help, argue against them. Gun victims against gun laws. Abortion survivors against abortion. Minorities against affirmative action. The disenfranchised against entitlements. Immigrants against illegal immigration. Terminal patients against medical marijuana. Addicts against legalizing marijuana.
Sorry for all the examples. How could those who normally agree with liberal/progressive polices out of empathy support them, when they here the stories of the very people they are supposed to be helping condemn these politically correct agendas?
The best way to deal with the issue of Cultural Marxism is to deny it's existence in the first place. A communist construct of the 30's, it was meant to intimidate and silence. Conservative folk, being the upbeat pleasant sort that they tend to be, are aware of other people's feelings. It is this kindness that the evil Hissing Vipers seek to exploit.
So, deny them. Stand your ground. Be honest and forthright. it is, indeed, a liberating experience…
What's funny, no – side busting hillarious, is that these are the people who cry, whine and moan that they are the purveyors of open mindness and free speech. Then they actually say what they're thinking, like Auntie, that they want to be the ones who decide what that means. Doesn't sound so free to me. How about you Auntie?
Well you know, he was a Republican. I wish more of our current day Republicans had as stiff a spine as he did.
I'm turning both you guys in.
…You are getting very sleepy…
pitching one disenfranchised minority group after another (divide and rule) is THE oldest strategy of plutocracy.
Sorry to steal your thunder. But I'm happy that we think alike!
Yes, and that is what the left is doing — so what's your point?
Into every life a little civil disobedience must fall!
AntiFacist: Your name suggests you have a lot of self hatred going on.
yeah, that's pretty much it. what's retarded about this…
(oops, is that me being un-PC? uh oh. where are those brightbart thought police now?)
…is that what is a "racial slur", or a "homophobic slur" and what is not is societally determined. try to start a movement against it, just try it. if there ever was lost cause that is it.
its all misguided as he||. just keep it positive people. The negative ones – the ones either using slurs or the ones using Political Correctness as a club – they only hurt themselves in the long run. Time proves this. As Fat Albert said: "He who throws mud only looses ground!"
Secretary of DHS already targeted us.
She wasn't the point of the article, only that people have tried to tear her down because she merely said her opinion.
Maybe you should work on your comedy skills first. Nothing you've written so far is remotely deserving of a ha or HA!!
Racism has nothing to do with it. You are seeing racism where it isn't there which is what the PC mob tend to do.
Where does he think the plutocrats learned it? Haven't seen the word plutocrat since reading the history of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. But nevertheless, we plutocrats must stick together. How many plutos do you have?
You can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater and you can't force your religion on other people. What you do by yourself is your business, but if it affects me you are a nuisance to society.
It's funny that you should mention Auntie Fascist. Trolls are the modern internet version of the Nazi and Commie thugs who used to disrupt meetings of anyone they thought was dangerous to them.
When the Nazis and Commies were still struggling to gain power, they would send these thugs to the meetings to start fights, shout people down, or just attack the participants — anything to break up the meetings and keep their opponents from organizing.
Our trolls are just like those thugs, only more cowardly as they are afraid to actually face their enemies.
Breitbart doesn't have the DHS targeting people as terrorists or possible terrorist. As far as I can see, you're even allowed to spout your jibberish. So unlike the left, we conservatives are tolerating you. And unlike the left we haven't labeled you Stalinist. Try to get that courtesy at the Kos or DemUnderground. You won't. Thing about liberals I can't tell whether they're 5 or 50 years old. The arguments are the same.
It didn't say she was censored. You saw what happened…the PC thugs came after her and condemned her act of free speech. She gladly accepted the consequences of her actions which was merely to answer a question honestly and from the heart, and she was blasted for it.
And guess what? She forgave them. And didn't back down an inch.
I sold mine when they decided they were no longer planets.
I would say that she is the one of the front line of people who are starting the movement. She is not allowing the PC thugs to intimidate her. We should all follow and support her actions.
Come back disappearing post. . . come back. . .
Sleepy no, hungry yes.
If you only knew what he was actually talking about in point #2 because it's obvious that you don't.
I am writing this slowly, because I know you have a problem with comprehension. Read the first amendment. Nobody is forcing religion on you (I am an atheist myself) You want people to violate their principals, which are protected by the Constitution, for your convenience.
Post-modernist/post-structuralist (the distinction doesn't matter in this discussion) Michel Foucault, the openly gay man who cheered the Iranian Islamic Revolution as it executed gays because the Ayatollah's revolution was anti-Western, argued that language shaped thought, not vice versa. Hence the need for his disciples in leftist elite circles like academia and the press to control the language.
Orwell described the same process of mind control through language control in "1984". Orwell, BTW, was a democratic socialist who hated the totalitarian left. Political correctness represents a more subtle, but no less insidious, effort by the left today to eliminate thought deemed unacceptable by ruling elites.
Post your email, I'll get back to ya.
Or, let your kids build character and pay for their own school by working, or loans, or, *GASP*, joining the military.
Awesome!! The very first comment proves exactly what Hudnall is talking about: disagree with the thought police, and get called a bigot in lieu of reasoned discussion. (The strawman was tossed in just to make room in the closet, I guess.)
antifascist, please tell me that:
A. Your nym is supposed to be ironic, and:
B. You're actually Hudnall posting as a sockpuppet. Because you must be.
You can't shout "fire" in a crowded theater…unless there is a fire. Think about that.
Auntie Adolph,
Don't ever stop posting here buddy. The joy that you bring us, letting everyone make fun of your idiotic posts, is absolutely priceless. You are like the gift that keeps on giving. If I didn't know better, I'd swear you were a plant.
Hear hear!!! I am sorry but if someone is being retarded I am going to tell them… (which btw stems from the Latin ritardare which means to be slow)… :/ I am going to tell it like I see it regardless of whether it's going to "hurt your feelings"… If I "hurt someones feelings" by something I say then they really need to grow a pair and be a big kid now…
It's right up there with teachers not allowed to use red pens to correct students work because it "hurts their self-esteem" so it is deemed politically incorrect… :/
retarded idiots..
Don't listen AP, you're on a roll!
"It implies that people in these groups are somehow lesser and weaker and must be “protected”, presumably by the government, and then implies that they are not being treated well by other groups (namely white males) which is an inherently racist argument."
is he or is he not saying that its in fact the liberals who are racist? There's something to consider with this point here, but my point is still true: that now here it is the author that is casting someone as racist.
You know what? GOOD FOR HER. I mean that. I'm fine with what she did.
but my point, again, is that no censorship occured here.
You'd be a much more effective troll if you could debate coherently and come up with any valid points. Instead all you do is increase the hit count of this site improving the ad revenue.
boy, I'm getting roasted on that. I was going to say: "oligarchy", but in looking it up it seemed plutocrat was a better word. Or I could have said "the rich".
How about "the establishment" or "the powers that be" or "the franchise(d)"? If any of those work for you, let me know and we can start this all over again. . .
okay, now you are getting reported.
Thank you for reasserting what the real struggle is. Statism vs. Individualism. Every freedom-loving individual has to keep this squarely in focus. 2010 is coming up fast.
Who can guess what my favorite line from the original Bad News Bears was? Please, somebody up the ante from PC-U to a radical comedy that's main goal is to offend every single group by the end of the movie. Matt, Trey – were looking to you!
One thing to do is keep all of the PC non-words alive: I use the term "mongoloid idiot" every chance I get, and it's amazing to see people – even self-described libertarians – cringe. I love that. Then, women are "chicks" or, better yet, "gals." Remember to also use "shrinks" and "eggheads" too. Anything like that you can think of.
If confronted, any variation on, "I am utterly insensitive to your feelings" will work fine.
You flatter yourself with your nickname.
'Censorship' can be defined as attempting to police the morality/thought of others. The people who attacked Prejean weren't just "speaking out". They tried everything to take her crown away. Her statement, which was PROVOKED, not spontaneous, was used to disqualify her in a contest.
If it were just people saying they disagree, or that she's stupid, then you'd have a point. But any concerted attack on an individual because of something they say or do is censorship.
Truth is blasphemy in pc, so telling the truth no matter what, in as big or as small a way as one individually can, is the best way to tear it apart. Truth hurts, we always hear, but it hurts pc liars the most. Tell the truth, always, is the answer.
you score on several points here- yes they are the modern day equivalent of Red or Nazi thugs ala' the Beer Hall putsch… and they are cowardly as well. The most fascinating thing about this is the comparisons between Hitler's SA and Ernst Rohm- Andy Stern of the SEIU? Or Heydrich and the SS? the ACORN honchos? we floated this some time ago and it seems to have caught on (not that brilliant of an asertion, mind you) and some of the parallels are striking. Apt, too- this bunch is far more into fascism than garden variety socialism…
Societal political correctness needs to simply be defied. In the political arena and the liberal media zoo Republicans need to respond in the same manner Newt did at the R convention when asked a dimwitted question by some leftwing rodent with a press pass; he ripped the hypocritical propagandist and ridiculed their blatant one-sidedness. When Newt finished his brilliant slapdown the reporter simply said “thank you” and slithered away. This is how you deal with leftist fascists. If Republicans in DC are unwilling to verbally destroy these mental pygmies and stand up for the other half of America that rejected this fraud for a president then they should be kicked outta office.
I would just like to highlight how mentally challenged the govt lapdogs in the media are. Recently while channel surfing on the radio I heard Ann Coulter and decided to listen. The detestable wretch, Joy Behar, was sitting in for Larry King and asked Ann a question; I’ll paraphrase it: “Why are you homophobic rightwing nazis so mean to us? You capitalist pigs are never nice to us liberals.” Ann unfortunately didn’t rip this demented airhead and instead somewhat entertained the ridiculous question/assertion not to mention utter tone deafness to the hypocrisy. Conservatives should not give any legitimacy to their delusional dreck and should mock it mercilessly. Let the public see what fools these liberals really are; from their hyperventilating chicken-little syndrome over the weather to their appalling economic illiteracy.
we thought you were actually an intelligent addition to this site… silly us… enjoy your troll status and hide under your rock- no, make that a pebble…
The purveyors of PC need to be confronted with their own hypocrisy, which is generally surprisingly easy to uncover. Remember "the soft bigotry of low expectations"? Quite an ethical advance over political incorrectness that is, eh?
Funny thing is, when I think back on some of the politically incorrect comedy that amused me in my youth, some of the first names that come to mind are "The Firesign Theatre" and "The National Lampoon". Damned right-wingers…
I don't know what Ann said but the correct response would have been. "Wow. That was mean. You just called me a homophobic, nazi pig. I'm sorry but it's just not nice to call people names. I forget, who's supposed to be mean in this question?"
Must've been on the same wavelength. I threw out "chicky pie" and "gals" all day and it made my woman dominated department twist their necks like poor little puppies.
Political Correctness = Death
Most excellent.
What about Broads or Dames. Dames might be too old, but Broad might even get a laugh.
"PC is designed by German Marxists of the Frankfurt School to destroy Western culture."
Conspiracy Theories are the children of brilliant yet WEAK minds – capable of realizing the connections between seemingly disconnected entities, yet lacking the strength of will to face the true horror of the universe: That there is seldom if EVER any big-bad puppet master or even any purpose or organization to those connections or anything else… that the universe is amoral and chaotic by nature. The man who imagines a conspiracy while cowering in fear from chaos is the same as the man who imagines a god while cowering in fear from lightning.
wow, thats very kind of you. LOL. But "the establishment" or "powers that be" doesn't quite get at it. I was going for something more in the class-warfare vein. The franchised sounds like the collective ownership of the worlds McDonalds establishments. Here, would like some fries with your political correctness?
The people trying to "tear her down" are ALSO practicing their free speech. It's her right to offer her opinion, it's someone else's right to mock her opinion. It's the guy who owns those photos right to post them (since she was modeling for them.) It's even Perez Hilton's right to complain about her.
"We should all follow and support her actions."
If by that you mean, stand by what we believe and not be intimidated, then yes. I agree 100%. Thus I'm a troll. Now who wants some pie?
No, but the PC thugs have effectively discouraged the next contestant from stating her opinion. It's just not worth the hassle. The PC police don't have to actually censor you, they just have to make you think twice about saying anything un-PC and they've won.
Tell that to the jews. Oops. Imagine that I didn't actually reply to you.
Nope. "Establishment" was who we were after in the 60s. Find something more up-to-date.
We're opening pluto franchises.
AntiFascist wants there to be no racism. And to accomplish his task he's going to form a more perfect society, and the most-antifascist among them will have uniforms with armbands. And those who are racist, well not racist, those who tolerate free speech will not be able to work because they may pollute the thought culture of the workplace.
Because then the Thought Police try the other tack- the Uncle Tom smear. Just ask Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Mike Steele or any other black conservative or Republican. Liberals can't stand it when black people up and run off the Democrat plantation (to paraphrase Justice Thomas). If the insufficiently grateful belong to another victim group, say LGBT, then the PCPD charges them with "Stockholm Syndrome", or calls them "self-hating," or whatever other slur they can think of to delegitimize resistance to prescribed groupthink.
Ever read Mancuse, Bob? Gramsci?
Great piece – yes, political correctness has gone dangerously far in our society, distancing people from their own common sense. It must be stopped, crushed, killed. Count me in!
I wasn't saying that is why we have it, I was saying they are the ones who came up with the idea, and they did import it to the US. It took on a life of its own after various groups adopted the tactics.
And, again, you prove yourself incapable of logic or rational thought. Take the 'cognitive' out of your dissent. Why is it that you left-wingers are so intellectually flawed?
The concept is ironic reversal: when someone intends to do one thing, or acts under the auspices of some intent, but their actions bring about the reverse. It's juxtaposition: the statist presumes that by censoring speech they are fighting racism, when in fact they are being racist. It's remarkably similar to 'affirmative action'.
But of course you're a braindead troll who doesn't really care what the words mean.
Military-industrial complex? Nah, dated. Maybe Halliburton? That one always seems to raise leftist's hackles. Most of them don't even know what it is – they think it's some kind of right-wing organization, like the Elks.
I agree this is a predictable response that has been used in the past. Colin Powell is the best example of this, one minute the left say's he is Bush's "uncle Tom" the next minute they say Obama is credible on foreign relations and national security because Powell is endorsing him.
If those who argue against these "Stockholm Syndrome" tactics keep in mind Saul Alinskies Democratic playbook "Rules for Radicals" than they can plan their arguments accordingly. Knowing what the opposition is doing before they act is a very efective way to sway the American sheeple. They have utilized Rule 11 most often against their most dangerous opponents Clarence Thomas, Judge Robert Bork, Sara Palin Colin Powell, Condi Rice…
Rule number one is the bread and butter of the the Liberal/Progressive machine. They make the public believe the majority of America agrees with global warming, wind and solar power instead of nuclear, waterboarding as torture, amnesty for illegals and universal health care and so on. The majority of Americans do not support these issues in as great a number as they lead us to believe.
This is his list.
Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”
Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.
Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”
We need to know these tactics and plan accordingly.
Damn typos. MaRcuse.
Wonderful statement of the obvious. Welcome to the discussion that has been going on here for three days. Will you be informing us later that the sun came up this morning?
We've been waiting for the pie forever, I keep waiting for Keanu Reeves to show up and say all Neo-Like "There is No Pie."
Me too, I'm guessing a rhubarb plant.
Which coincidentally makes a great pie! *nudgenudgewinkwink*
9/11 truthers are brilliant?
I think it's a shared account, some days he's almost reasonable, other days you're wondering if suddenly all the Thorazine on Earth got recalled…
Exactly. The left are the ones that are always harping about Freedom of Speech…right until someone like Coulter, Tancredo or the Minute Men show up and then all of a sudden they have to "shut this hateful speech down!" I found it particularly ironic when they disrupted a symposium at Columbia where a former PLO and former Hitler Youth member were to speak about how fascists try to control thought and speech. The brave little Brownshirts shut those "hateful remarks" right down…
As I've said before, and I'm sure I'll say again, irony is completely lost on the left.
So MAC-D is the new official acronym? I want to be correct in this, you know so I can share it with the rest of the Cabal at our weekly meeting…
You are having way too much sex with that pie. You are going to go blind. It has already made you stupid. Don't you have a duty to shout "fire" in a crowded theater if the theater is on fire? You are the nuisance to society.
Aspidispis? Fern? Poison Sumac – yep
Yes. I'll be issuing a memo soon. . . that is to say, I would be issuing a memo if there were such a top secret cabal, but there isn't.
They may not understand irony, but they are certainly good at generating it. Hypocrisy too.
Is that the same cabal that is making our posts disappear?
On Mars.
Just trying to be helpful.
I know what you're trying to get at, but I can't for the life of me think of the right word. I would suggest "bourgeoisie", but the meaning of that one seems to have shifted since Marx's day. How about just "ruling class"? It's an oldie, but a goldie (no pun intended).
How about coining a phrase — elititarians.
Next door to the M&M store?
You mean the one on Hershey Highway. . .
Wait a minute, there's something wrong with that statement, I just don't know what it is. Darn my naive mind.
Are you for or against politically correct standards on speech, cognitive dissident?
Good article, though I think it should be pointed out that the Nazis were leftist (or at least statist) radicals just like the Marxists. Instead, it kind of seems like you're saying, "Marxists killed way more people than the Nazis, so you're worse," and thus implying that Nazism and conservatism are somewhat related. I'm sure that wasn't intended, just something to keep in mind for next time.
Has to be something out of Tanner's mouth.
Pluto is still a planet to me, you jerk!
That statement is on the level of obviousness as "Marxism was designed by Marx". Sometimes all can be traced to a single source. Certain aspects of a thing might have far more obscure or complex origins, but overall ideas can be traced somewhere.
The biggest problem with political correctness is the intellectual enfeeblement it promotes. No one can debate fiercely anymore. Every day I hear students and professors tiptoe through PC minefields, desperately trying to avoid offending every possible minority group (real or imagined).
The same cabal that suddenly decided a couple days ago every single post I make now officially logged in as my Intense Debate nom-de-plume, USArtboy, is instantly "deleted by the administrator" when it's clear the administrator couldn't have possibly read it? (But I can log out, put my user name into the guest box and my same comments go through. Weird. And annoying).
The same cabal that never seems to answer a question posed through to it through "the tips and feedback" or "contact us" link? That cabal?
Could be. They're meeting in the inner sanctum of the unfinished pyramid with the all-seeing eye. But I don't know the secret handshake. I guess that's why they don't answer.
How do we stop political correctness? I have an idea.
Why don't we round up people who promote this totalitarian trash and put them in forced labor re-education camps?
It wouldn't be brutal: we would have them playing tetherball, making macaroni art projects, and so forth.
And we could make them listen to 9 hours a day of talk radio: 3 hours of Rush, then 3 of Sean Hannity, then 3 of Mark Levin.
And they would be safely away from society,unable to damage it further.
Bill Maher, Rosie O'Donnell, Janeane Gaerofolo, oh the list goes on….
Apply enough napalm to anyone and they can be pretty bright, but that's about the only way the Truthers would make the cut…
I always liked Rush's "newsbabe" and "anchorette".
Ha, ha, ha! Excellent!
MovieBob = ClapTrap
Wow, interesting list. Thank you for sharing.
Gee. A whole new area of divorce law. Questioners who got the answer after the marriage.
I call myself colored or Negro. . .Sometimes I've used the word Broad or Dame (I swing dance for fun when I can, so it fits into the subculture). . .I occasionally use "retard", cause Ralphie May is right. . .at least they can pronounce it. :p
*MissQuinn*
Dssdnt is technically right on this one, even a concerted attack on someone is not censorship. However the actions of Hilton etc. may be (and are) very unethical and very anti-free speech. Let's not take the same definition of censorship that the left used during Bush…where their voice was never censored but in fact sold books and tickets to movies. As does Mark Levin etc. now.
Yes, 100% correct. We have to start a real grass roots movement of people forgoing PC speech and actually saying what they want to say. We cannot leave it up to the young people they have been brainwashed too much, or they have been taught not too think at all.
I do it as much as possible and it can be quite fun and satisfying.
You raise some good points. I think the web is a good place to break politically correct rules. My theory: Keep the bastards busy. But I also like to criticize left-wingers in public. That's fun too.
Author is correct. Political correctness decrees that Black Female homo, Sykes, is funny saying she wants conservatives to die. She is not FUNNY. She is disgusting.
Her abortion retort was perfect though. Left that idiot gobsmacked.
No fear, boys and girls! ‘60s radicals and their offspring are loud insecure children, and like children can be whiney, impetuous, brats. Simply do not accept their premise, counter absurdity with absurdity if necessary. PC = Impotent!
[...] Political Correctness Must Die In the early 20th century Marxism seemed like a good idea to many of the poor and downtrodden the world over. It hadn’t yet resulted in the untimely deaths of more people than all the wars of the 20th century combined. Even so, radicals then were as annoying and crazed as radicals now. So the people weren’t universally jumping on their bandwagon. The Marxists couldn’t flip governments without the masses. So they worked on a system to undermine unity in society. The old adage “United we stand, divided we fall” was on their mind. They had to divide the people in order to tear society apart and remake it their way. Thus, political correctness was born. This documentary does an excellent job of telling its story. PC is designed by German Marxists of the Frankfurt School to destroy Western culture. It should come as no surprise the the destruction of the family is one of its goals. And as it gained in prominence, its goals have been realized. The polarization of racial groups, and even of the sexes is another. That’s plenty of reason to see it die a horrible death. Marxists have murdered many times more people than the Nazis. They have destroyed the livelihoods of people the world over and imprisoned many millions in gulags and work camps. The last thing we want to do is let them win here or anywhere else. While it may seem communism is dead, communism, socialism, fascism are all part of a many headed hydra called statism. These are political systems which are all about empowering the state as much as possible. They name they go under now is “progressive.” rest of article [...]
I prefer the judicious application of willie pete.
This could work, but I wouldn't be shy about including a letter as to why you were withholding your donations.
Your column must have stuck a nerve with the trolls. Comments so nasty we can't read them?
Another Hudnall epic fail.
Has Obama(or anyone from his administration) tried to silence her?
No.
Has Prejean been sent to jail, or a gulag?
No.
Has she been forced to leave the country?
No.
Has she lost her title as Miss California?
No.
Far as I can tell, Prejean is doing okay, I'm sure she'll get a gig as a pundit with some right wing evangelical group and hit the college republican lecture circuit. More than the average pageant contestant can ever hope for!
So, where's the oppression of free speech?
Now, if you're really interested government officials trying muzzle free speech & thought, here's an example of that:
"…they're reminders to all Americans that they NEED TO WATCH WHAT THEY SAY, watch what they do. This is not a time for remarks like that…"
-Ari Fleischer(speaking for the Bush administration) talking about Bill Maher.
Antifascist, your comments are the best thing about this site, if I were you, I would consider every negative rating from the breitbots to be a badge of honor.
makes sense- we have actually had one or two reasonable exchanges but sounded like he/she/they were channeling auntie yesterday…
I hate political corretness as much as anyone else, but the r-word is something that really gets to me. You have every right to use the word, but there is no reason for you to use a word that is used almost universally to mock the mentally disabled. And don't tell me you don't mean to offend them, because everyone knows that "retarded" refers to the mentally disabled as one of its meanings. So if you want to tell the mentally disabled that their very existence is somehow annoying to you, then go ahead, but those of us with an ounce of class will make the tiny effort to find a different word, like stupid
One small suggestion to the moderators. Please don't completely delete someone's post no matter what their political positions are. If they use foul language, just use the hift and number keys to eliminate those words, and let their post remain. Kind of like bathing a skunk. It may not smell as bad, but it will still stink. winx. That way, eveyone who reads can see what can of person a poster truely is. Thanks for considering my request.
I think someone else mentioned that their posts were being deleted automatically as well. I hope you can get this fixed. It's annoying that posts vanish, but it would be REALLY annoying to be automatically deleted.
I wish they would at least let us know that they are working on this.
this one disappeared too
Sorry, USArtboy, I can't reply to you — my posts keep vanishing.
Basically, I said that I hope they solve these problems. Disappearing points is annoying, but having your posts automatically deleted would be infuriating.
I second Don's motion!
I guess the best way to end a discussion on censorship and political correctness is to delete all posts you disagree with.
I guess Hudnall is incapable of defending himself, so commenters who disagree with him get censored.
Right on! I remember when retarded WAS the politically correct term. I'd cringe when my dad called them dummies. Now who are the dummies?
You're retarded.
Yes, thank you. One must know their enemy in order to defeat their enemy.
James, this post is excellent. I'm very interested in hearing your suggested remedies. I hope #1 is -call a spade a spade (or some well put rendition of the adage) I myself having been injured several years ago and unable to gainfully function ever since, have been reffering to myself as "crippled" or "a cripple". Although you could call me "locomotively-challenged", or disabled, or even an invalid (but I am not "in-valid"), I walk with a limp, can't run, can't jump, can't bend over to pick up my 5 year-old. I am in fact crippled. I feel no shame, no disgrace and won't be offended when someone else describes me as such. This is a fight we all need to win.
http://shermansmarch.blogspot.com
I've been sending a polite but direct e-mail to the help desk here everyday. I might try scrapping my profile and start over with a new name.
"…having your posts automatically deleted would be infuriating."
It is infuriating since I've not written anything violating the site's rules. Certainly nothing worse than some of the trolls who show up here. It's too bad too because this has become a favorite site of mine and this is a disincentive to participate, which defeats the purpose of the site–conservatives engaging in cultural debates.
I've sent several e-mails as well about the disappearing posts, but I've never heard back either. Someone else mentioned having the same problem you are having, but I can't remember who.
Christians, conservatives, patriots, or those who wish to STOP the "progressives" need to immediately PULL THEIR CHILDREN from ALL public schools. Plan to do it, set a goal, work out your finances, MAKE IT HAPPEN. You might have to give up some of life's "toys" to either home school or private school them, but it is worth it! Take control of YOUR kids NOW. If you don't, the state will. You bet they already ARE!
In reading some of these comments, I'd like to stress that there is a difference in the PC idea and the general idea of decency. There is no need to be overly crude or rude in the use of "retard" or any of the other terms many of you feel joy out of tossing out just to get a reaction. Consider the viewpoint of a mother with a special needs child. That mother didn't choose for her child to have a serious chromosome disorder, nor did the child. They live with the broken hearts, the stress and fights for peace in the home, the ridicule from outsiders, and to be confronted with very rude terms is unnecessary, especially from conservatives who are supposed to be the rational ones. Sometimes, in your haste to defeat the wicked "PC" you might actually be stepping accross the line in the other direction so far that you're just as far off the "liberty" trail as the progressives. You don't have to be downright ugly about it. It looks like just an excuse to be crude and militant and be able to justify your anger at the expense of others.
Yes. I have a special needs child in my family, and yes I detest political correctness. I do not however detest courtesy and respect for those who cannot help how they are born. Homosexuality IS A CHOICE, being born with chromosome disorders is not a choice.
Please consider this before you spew your "retard" type words, some mother may have just had a really heart-breaking battle with her mentally retarded child, who is bigger than her, and who may have not only stressed her out mentally to the brink of tears, but could have actually hurt her physically, all the while not having any idea they were doing anything wrong, nor could they control it. Seriously, live one day in that mother's shoes, then see if you're as callus with your battle against PC.
Out…
Perhaps if you had a point, that might help?
Just Speak plainly and use correct terminology.
eg: Queers are queer (look it up in any dictionary)
Gay is a mood, not a perversion…if they were actually gay, they weouldn't have the highest depression and suicide rates of any self-identified group would they?
Killing defenceless people is not a choice for those being murdered. Anti-Human Rights extremism, or more specifically anti-right to-life extremism is accurate. right to choose is innaccurate, because the choice is undefined. RIght to choose could mean right to choose _____(insert whatever). That's false.
We can eliminate PC terms without being rude. My brother was born with Down syndrome. At the time people with his condition were called "Mongoloid." So when you use the term "mongoloid," you are using a word that was in use during the early '60's and before. But you probably can and should drop the word "idiot" since that is just insulting and rude rather than "non-PC." One of the things that bothers me even more than the PC jargon we have been forced to adopt, however, is the rudeness and meanness of the society in which we now live. People who seem to be proud of their brutal honesty are usually more brutal than honest.
[...] 20. Political Correctness Must Die! [...]
No, I wasn't saying that. Merely pointing out that Marxists aren't the good guys and their motivations are destructive.
My contribution to the PC lexicon … recall the ADT commercials when a non-descript white male in a hoodie tries to break into a house … please, don't call him a thief or burglar, call him an "undocumented family member."
I agree. however the word retarded is not bad in itself. It just means slow. PC types are over sensitive. Their own concoctions will become offensive over time and they would have to change them again. It's insanity and it has to end.
Just being politically incorrect.
[...] and tolerance in the Age of Obama Liberty Pundit: Hate and the Left James Hudnall, Big Hollywood: Political Correctness Must Die PoliGazette: Miss California Under Fire First, Hero of the Right Now Stop the ACLU: Beauty queens [...]
"Elititarians" – I like it very much!
Consider the point that by ceaselessly denigrating the superiority of our uniquely American cultural or personal attribute, the Lefties ARE getting some moderates to stop supporting conservative values.
Being "PC" isn't a good enough answer until PC stands for "Principled Conservative".
The lefties want us to accept as fact the American way is by definition inferior, and therefore should be replaced with just about anything as soon as possible. I'm happy to tell these types they can take a long walk on a short pier.
America Rocks, and the more we give any our values and way of life, and let's not forget about actually adhering to Constitutional Law ; ) , the easier it is to ultimately flip the world's greatest country into a gulag kletocracy.
As the song goes, "If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything."
You mean the rich liberals who can't stand the thought that they were successful because of their own eforts & talents?
Wish I could give 10 thumbs up for that comment 'Bohemond' – exactly what I was thinking. The Left "hi-tech lynches' a black man on his way to the Supreme Court and what is their punishment? One of the lead lynchers is selected as VP to a man-child for TOTUS.
There is plenty of political correctness or religious correctness or family correctness on the right as on the left. Harry Potter books, Dan Brown books freak out Christians and Catholics. Singing the Star Spangled Banner in Spanish angered many conservatives a few years back. Talking evolution angers some Christians. Anything homosexual freaks the right out especially if it involves teaching kids to accept that gay people are actually normal people and not crazy.
That said, I think racial slurs and homophobic phrases and misogynistic references should be questioned by everyone because they are offensive and unessesary. I'm not sure why you say these employer claims are made up. Are you kidding? It's just now it is not acceptable for employees to harrass people like it was back in the 1960's or 70's.
Political correctness only becomes an issue when the government steps in and tells us what we cannot say in such a way as to completely hinder our everyday existence. I don't see that happening. What I see are right wing or left wing groups going nuts over people who have opinions they don't share. I agree it is too bad but if you go public with an opinion people will have an opinion right back at you.
I did not and would never suggest your comment be deleted. I disagree with those in the shadowy "administration" (which does not include Hudnall) who are deleting anything other than comments which are clearly unacceptable. I did not agree with your comment, but it was in no way unacceptable within the bounds of reasonable conversation. There is, as you say, more than a little irony in deleting comments on a post about PC and censorship.
Finally, I would note that Hudnall is well capable of defending himself, so that strawman won't work.
As a woman I'd go for that – just keep the word "doll" for a sincere term of endearment.
No, I'm talking about the rich power elite that employ a dubious mechanism to concentrate wealth and influence while externalizing legal responsibility: CORPORATIONS.
against. I'm also against all the stupid rules on this board that keep getting comments deleted.
See how consistent I am?
Dear James Hundall – what's up with the sexy naked girl with the tape over her mouth? She looks a bit young, by the way. Are you sure she's of the proper age to be doing such risque "art" photography?
If there's one thing that's worse than Political Correctness… its people b*tching about it.
Hey lunch money! How is the part-time job at the used record store going? Still hoping to be kissed by a girl before you are 30? Try to understand something (anything!) – no one forces their religion on anyone in this country. It.doesn't.happen.tool. People are free to discuss religion and try to persuade you and you are free to agree or disagree. Whenever liberal fascists like yourself whine about religion being forced you just show how emotionally and intellectually immature you are. Like we didn't know that already. And yes – I called you a liberal fascist. You are the quintessential type – a powerless little non-entity who fantasizes about remaking the country in his pimply-faced image. Orwell said liberals are powerless people who worship power. Pretty much sums you up. You would impose your views on the rest of us in a draconian form if given the chance – and that explains your man-crush on the big O. Because you hope he will. Get bent loser.
Anti-Monitor, what's your point?
I don't pick the images
No, it's people defending it.
Instead of criticizing "political correctness", why not ignore it, and just go about acting un-PC?
The documentary was… interesting. Although I don't buy the whole "Marxist conspiracy" line, and I would argue that at this point conservatives have their "politically Correct" points as well, I do agree that focusing on P.C. and both sides of the spectrum staging their "outrage of the day" based on what someone said in an unguarded moment is severely destroying free speech and undermining our democracy. I hadn't heard of the Frankfurt School or Marcuse before. Definitely bears more research.
Although I agree with the author that political correctness is about mind control and censorship, and that it can be used for evil, bigoted uses, I disagree that it has not helped in making society more tolerant:
Because of political correctness, racists, sexists, homophobics and xenophobics are repressed from expressing their bigoted ideas. When these ideas are suppressed systematically, they tend to die, because less people are exposed to them.
However, it represses more than what is necessary, so it should be killed.
You really should look the word up. Any attempt to suppress someone's thought or speech is censorship. This was, and continues to be, censorship. The difference between this and the left's ravings is that they claimed censorship when NOTHING was happening. If every mainstream media bleach blond jackass had been calling them names, if they had people digging in their past and publishing private photos, or all the other harrassment the anti-Prop-8 crowd have engaged in, then it would be a fair analogy.
Call a spade a spade. When one mindset controls the airwaves, speaking out against and trying to suppress the alternative is censorhship.
Love it! Andrew hits another one out of the park!
All it's done is make bigots use code words. It didn't make them more tolerant
All it's done is make bigots use code words. It didn't make them more tolerant
I didn't say it's a Marxist conspiracy, only that they invented it
[...] Know Your Enemy pt. 1 We are at war. As was the case before 9/11, we didn’t know we were at war. War had been declared against us and we didn’t notice. Real hard to fight a war effectively if you don’t know you’re in it. Here we see one of the main lines of attack. It is a long video, 1:21 and change, but it lays it out pretty clearly. The interview was filmed nearly 25 years ago, but it remains extremely relevant today, not because the Soviet Union is still at it, but because the programs set in motion continued under the weight of their own internal logic. In this series of video the principles outlined above are further elaborated. And finally, here we see the development of the theoretical underpinnings of the system, posted at Big Hollywood. [...]
I've read most of the comments to this post on here, not most of the replies, so I may be a little off in noting (but not too far off, I'm sure)…
That it's funny nobody (that I've seen) MENTIONED the PC diary "Big Brother" by George Orwell –or, is it true that so many schools have banned it that no on reads it anymore? It's got the best description of a society that's FULL of PC language — I mean, "NewSpeak" as it's called– and how that Society deals with the "mental knowledge" of it's people, to the point of not allowing anyone to question WHO that government is fighting in the ongoing War On Terror — WAIT, I'm sorry, that's not what they call it in the book– in the book, it's a nameless, faceless enemy that must always be fought, yet would probably never be defeated… Oh, I'm sorry, I'm still describing the War On Terror…
Or — wait, which war is which? I'm confused now… what's in the book, and what's real life about again???
Please, read the book and get back to me on this… I'm really lost now… Thanks
…
Calling someone a "retard" is wrong. Being retarded is a physical and mental condition. Normally, calling someone a "retard" is pointedly and knowingly being mean and demeaning. Being Politically Correct is decidedly different. Not discussing "illegal" immigration is not a statement about a particular individual. Not meant as a put down, its a discussion about illegal activity. I generally find people who use the term "a retard" somewhat indicative of their own lack of intelligence and spirit.
Ugh….You are a fool sir. And your views on history are inaccurate at best! Marxism did not "kill more people than all those who died in WWII" as you posted. Marxism was a philosophy developed in the 19th Century by men who saw the exploitation of workers during the industrial revolution as an evil that needed to be corrected. And they were not wrong in that observation. MArxism is a PHILOSOPHY, not a group or organization you imbecile! That would be as correct as saying that "National Socialism killed all the jews in the The Holocaust". If you want to get on a soap box here on your little blog and try to influence opinon then at least attempt to be accurate, or is that your point? To spread hate and ignorance as a form of control??? Or are you just plain ignorant? I believe in liberty too and I think government needs to be kept in check. But you need to try a more educated approach my foolish friend, or just shut up. Cause youre not helping anybody except other ignorant fools such as yourself! Get an education…all of you!!!
Ñîâðåìåííàÿ ÑÒÎ ýôôåêòèâíî è êà÷åñòâåííî âûïîëíÿåò ñâîè ôóíêöèè ïðè ïîìîùè ðàçëè÷íîãî âèäà îáîðóäîâàíèÿ…
àâòîðåìîíò…
Øèðîêèé ñïåêòð ñîâðåìåííîãî øàõòíîãî è ãîðíîîáîãàòèòåëüíîãî îáîðóäîâàíèÿ íàñ÷èòûâàåò áîëåå 100 íàèìåíîâàíèé…
âèáðàòîðû, ãðîõîòû, æåëåçîîòäåëèòåëè…
àñôàëüòîóêëàä÷èêè, àâòîêðàíû, áóëüäîçåðû, ãðåéäåðû, êàòêè, ïîãðóç÷èêè, ýêñêàâàòîðû…
Ïîãðóç÷èêè èñïîëüçóþòñÿ äëÿ çàñûïêè, ðàñêîïêè, âûðàâíèâàíèè è äðóãèõ ðàáîò ñ ðàçëè÷íûìè ìàòåðèàëàìè…
Êàê çàðàáîòàòü â èíòåðíåòå…
èíñòðóêöèè ïî çàðàáîòêó â ñåòè…
Ïÿòèçâåçäî÷íûå îòåëè Åãèïòà…
Åãèïåò – æåì÷óæèíà ìèðîâîé êóëüòóðû…
You must be logged in to post a comment.