<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fat is the New Smoking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breeding chiuaua &#124; 24seventechs</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-2837752</link>
		<dc:creator>Breeding chiuaua &#124; 24seventechs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-2837752</guid>
		<description>[...] Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fat is the New SmokingI had a feeling a chiuaua wouldn&#8217;t be the best dog anyway. By the way all of the dogs we had before were outside dogs. Our Rot is the first dog I have ever owned that we allowed to live inside. It has worked out very well so far. &#8230; What to look for when buying my pup. rsaarinen Breeding 53 09-01-2005 03:43 PM&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fat is the New SmokingI had a feeling a chiuaua wouldn&#8217;t be the best dog anyway. By the way all of the dogs we had before were outside dogs. Our Rot is the first dog I have ever owned that we allowed to live inside. It has worked out very well so far. &#8230; What to look for when buying my pup. rsaarinen Breeding 53 09-01-2005 03:43 PM&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-1148854</link>
		<dc:creator>James Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1148854</guid>
		<description>P.S. We fat guys can conceal WAYYY bigger guns! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. We fat guys can conceal WAYYY bigger guns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty Antonik Wakfer</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-1148198</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty Antonik Wakfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1148198</guid>
		<description>What is lacking in this blog entry is a recognition that self-responsibility is necessarily required for a self-regulating society. If the majority of individuals in a society that is ruled (democratically or not) want the equivalent of parents who make decisions for chronologically adult children, this situation with &quot;fat-taxes&quot; is just one resulting example - another is forced government single-payer health care. 
 
Government practices of &quot;protecting&quot; citizens is very much like that of parents who discourage their chronologically adult children from making full socially mature decisions (standing on their own 2 feet and taking the consequences). So if adults make poor health choices, they should properly experience the effects of reality and not be cushioned with the forcibly removed assets/wealth of others - all government programs are paid for via taxes, immediate or when principle and interest is paid on loans taken by the government. 
 
One would best wonder what the government (those running and promoting it) gets from a citizenry that is largely low (?very low?) on the self-responsibility scale.... 
 
On the other hand, an airlines charging customers according to the weight being transported, their bodies plus baggage, is a good option for those willing to fly these days. And of course with a company, one can choose to use another or some totally different means if the service is not to one&#039;s liking. However, governments do everything they can - including physical force - to prevent those in their self-proclaimed jurisdiction from opting out. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is lacking in this blog entry is a recognition that self-responsibility is necessarily required for a self-regulating society. If the majority of individuals in a society that is ruled (democratically or not) want the equivalent of parents who make decisions for chronologically adult children, this situation with &quot;fat-taxes&quot; is just one resulting example &#8211; another is forced government single-payer health care. </p>
<p>Government practices of &quot;protecting&quot; citizens is very much like that of parents who discourage their chronologically adult children from making full socially mature decisions (standing on their own 2 feet and taking the consequences). So if adults make poor health choices, they should properly experience the effects of reality and not be cushioned with the forcibly removed assets/wealth of others &#8211; all government programs are paid for via taxes, immediate or when principle and interest is paid on loans taken by the government. </p>
<p>One would best wonder what the government (those running and promoting it) gets from a citizenry that is largely low (?very low?) on the self-responsibility scale&#8230;. </p>
<p>On the other hand, an airlines charging customers according to the weight being transported, their bodies plus baggage, is a good option for those willing to fly these days. And of course with a company, one can choose to use another or some totally different means if the service is not to one&#39;s liking. However, governments do everything they can &#8211; including physical force &#8211; to prevent those in their self-proclaimed jurisdiction from opting out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son of the Republic</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-1259998</link>
		<dc:creator>Son of the Republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1259998</guid>
		<description>Do not be silly! Of course the new taxes will not apply to anyone in Congress or who has ever worked for Congress. Only us serfs will pay. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not be silly! Of course the new taxes will not apply to anyone in Congress or who has ever worked for Congress. Only us serfs will pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissQuinn</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-1260454</link>
		<dc:creator>MissQuinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1260454</guid>
		<description>Wait till the feminists get around to Lust. . .They partially have though. 
 
*MissQuinn* </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till the feminists get around to Lust. . .They partially have though. </p>
<p>*MissQuinn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-4/#comment-1280898</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1280898</guid>
		<description>&quot;They&quot; already have blamed the overweight for the &quot;second-hand&quot; affect.  If you recall, several months ago, &quot;they&quot; said that fat people were contagious...that fat people had the &quot;fat virus&quot; which their skinny counterparts would catch.  A skinny could even catch this virus if they talked to their fat family and fat friends on the phone!.  This &quot;new&quot; insult to fat people is just another way to ridicule a group of people other than one&#039;s self. So, society has determined that fat people and smokers are not human, and are not entitled to certain unalienable rights that skinny people and non-smokers are entitled to.  Meanwhile...Who&#039;ll be next?  Blonde blue-eyed people?  Maybe the Chinese because there are so many of them they are depleting the oxygen levels.  Beware condemning others...eventually &quot;they&quot; will run out of fat people, smokers, christians, etc to pick on and the condemning and ridiculing will turn to you, the unexpecting guilty parties who are agreeing with this insanity...&quot;they&quot;! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;They&quot; already have blamed the overweight for the &quot;second-hand&quot; affect.  If you recall, several months ago, &quot;they&quot; said that fat people were contagious&#8230;that fat people had the &quot;fat virus&quot; which their skinny counterparts would catch.  A skinny could even catch this virus if they talked to their fat family and fat friends on the phone!.  This &quot;new&quot; insult to fat people is just another way to ridicule a group of people other than one&#039;s self. So, society has determined that fat people and smokers are not human, and are not entitled to certain unalienable rights that skinny people and non-smokers are entitled to.  Meanwhile&#8230;Who&#039;ll be next?  Blonde blue-eyed people?  Maybe the Chinese because there are so many of them they are depleting the oxygen levels.  Beware condemning others&#8230;eventually &quot;they&quot; will run out of fat people, smokers, christians, etc to pick on and the condemning and ridiculing will turn to you, the unexpecting guilty parties who are agreeing with this insanity&#8230;&quot;they&quot;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WFL</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-3/#comment-1147526</link>
		<dc:creator>WFL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1147526</guid>
		<description>I was going to go point by point with your many silly statements, but it&#039;s just not worth my time.  Suffice it to say, your an idiot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to go point by point with your many silly statements, but it&#039;s just not worth my time.  Suffice it to say, your an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WFL</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-3/#comment-1147346</link>
		<dc:creator>WFL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1147346</guid>
		<description>I was going to go point by point with your many silly statements, but it&#039;s just not worth my time.  Suffice it to say, your an idiot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to go point by point with your many silly statements, but it&#39;s just not worth my time.  Suffice it to say, your an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riverboat gambler</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-3/#comment-1318950</link>
		<dc:creator>riverboat gambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1318950</guid>
		<description>they should deny it - these people have purposely and willfully chosen an unhealthy lifestyle, so why should we (the public) be stuck with the bill? You reap what you sow. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should deny it &#8211; these people have purposely and willfully chosen an unhealthy lifestyle, so why should we (the public) be stuck with the bill? You reap what you sow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesHudnall</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/04/22/fat-is-the-new-smoking/comment-page-3/#comment-1146570</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesHudnall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=110942#comment-1146570</guid>
		<description>As the writer of this piece I will explain it to you: politicians, bureaucrats and the media who enables them.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the writer of this piece I will explain it to you: politicians, bureaucrats and the media who enables them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

