Review: Leave ‘The Box’ On the Doorstep
by John P. HanlonThe new film “The Box” starts off with a simple premise. A stranger leaves a box at a young couple’s door early one morning in Richmond, Virginia. Later on, that stranger comes to visit the couple and he tells the young wife that if she pushes the red button in the box, she’ll receive a million dollars but someone that she does not know will die. The stranger does not explain how or who or even why this will occur. He just gives her the instructions and a time-frame. The premise is an interesting one to develop but unfortunately, this movie fails to develop it and the film is quickly overwhelmed by a bizarre series of events that follows the choice over whether or not to push the button.

The film is set in the mid-1970s and the lead couple, Arthur and Norma Lewis, are played by James Marsden and Cameron Diaz. He works for NASA and she’s an elementary school teacher. They’re a relatively boring couple with one son The movie begins with the doorbell ringing very early in the morning and the couple finding the box on the doorstep. Mrs. Lewis learns more about the box from Arlington Steward, played by Frank Langella, the mystery man who dropped it off. The young couple has recently faced some disappointing news about their jobs and the financial benefits of pushing the button are obvious to both of them, even though their financial situation has not been detailed enough to show a compelling desire for them to lean towards pushing the button at the expense of another person’s life.
Whether or not to push the button is the psychological dilemma that the characters are faced with. Will they choose to benefit themselves at the expense of a stranger’s death? Will the button really cause a person’s death, and if they push it not believing in the consequences are they still accountable for it?
It is, after all, just a button. In a box.
Unfortunately, though, the debate about these issue is over rather quickly. Instead of focusing on the reasons behind making either choice, a decision is made hastily. The movie then becomes about the consequences of the decision rather than the choice itself, which would have been a far more interesting concept to explore.
From the decision about the button until the end of the movie, the film explores the repercussions that come from the couple’s choice. Once that choice is made, the movie quickly trends into a surreal and strange journey too bizarre for viewers to care much about. The premise of the movie comes with enough questions to last for the rest of the film, but instead of slowly answering them and raising the stakes on the choice, the movie instead takes the audience into an even stranger world that involves lightning strikes, identity loss, and zombie-like behavior. These odd events keep occurring without a full or clear explanation.
Also, because the movie starts off quickly, there is very little time to develop the lead characters and their status in life. From then on, it is hard to understand their actions and motivations and to empathize with their plight. We know the couple faced frustrations at the workplace and obviously a million dollars would be beneficial, but who are these people before they receive the box is a question never asked. Since the box comes into play so early in the movie, the characters are often doing and saying things that revolve around it.
Overall, I did like the premise of the movie and I was intrigued when I saw the commercial. However, if you expect a psychological thriller about a strange choice and how a couple makes it, you’ll be sorely disappointed. This movie focuses on the less interesting consequences of the choice and the weird and paranormal nature of those consequences.
The movie had a lot of promise on the outside but on the inside, viewers will quickly learn how shallow this box really is.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
67 Comments
Odd that it takes place in the 70's, didn't "the twilight zone" have this as one of the stories?
another good idea dashed upon the rocks.
Hollywood has so little faith in us, that they refuse to develop a clever idea and slip in some special effects. I'd like to think they just aren't capabale. I'm probably wrong.
I'm assuming they press the button. If I'm right, this sounds like another movie with the moral – money makes people do bad, bad things. I'm glad I read this, because I love psychological thrillers, but I hate bad character development.
When I see trailers for upcoming movies, I often think that the premise of the film is interesting. When I actually see the film, I am usually disappointed with the where the film goes. Is this a sign that the people doing the trailer are doing an excellent job, the people making the movie itself do a poor job or is it just me? Probably a bit of each.
When I saw the trailer for this movie, I thought it was an interesting premise but I did not expect to see it well executed. It appears I guessed correctly.
So, what could have been an an interesting morality tale in and of itself " instead takes the audience into an even stranger world that involves lightning strikes, identity loss, and zombie-like behavior".
That sounds about right.
Typical of Hollywood, another potentially interesting film premise that can't possibly be executed because of their mediocre talent pool both in well written scripts and on the executive level.
I haven't been able to stomach Cameron Diaz since 2004 when she cried on Oprah about "if you are for women being raped then vote for George Bush". Ugh, what an insipid fool that woman is.
The trout lips aren't doing her any favors, either. She looks awful.
Sounds like a sad remake of "The 27th Day"—a great Sci Fi film
I think her statement was "if you want rape to be illegal, vote"
I for one am glad that the pro rape party never got much traction.
The thundering intellect that is Cameron Diaz has one purpose: to look good. She is not fulfilling her reason for being in my opinion.
Now that is a great story line.
No, you are right – they are incapable. That is the entire problem with Hollywood. They can no longer create a new idea. I keep telling my wife that that town has officially run out of new ideas. As for the so-called new stuff – it is useless CGI drivel. Avatar?? WTH??
Besides, if any of them actually made a movie that questioned their liberalistic leanings, they would be jettisoned from the bowels of Hollywood, never alloed to return – you and I might be fine with that, but that is the only life those cellar dwellers know.
I give Cameron Diaz credit..she tries.
I wish she would stop trying, but she tries.
; )
Ask Hillary Clinton about pushing buttons–reset or otherwise–it seems to always be problematic.
yeah in Modern America we all get credit just for trying.
It blows me away someone can churn out a two-hour movie from a 10-page short story and expect people to go see it. Who green lights this crap? Here's a better idea, pick up He Is Legend from Amazon for a great take on Richard Matheson's short tales, with other authors re-working the some of his best. Or grab his own short story collection "The Collected Stories" which will include The Box. It's amazing what that guy could do in a few thousand words in a book that a movie can't come close to matching even with special effects and pretty faces.
http://www.videosift.com/video/The-red-button
BRILLIANT (and hilarious parody)
Leftist math: 1+1=3. It's wrong but here's an A for just trying for the nth time, and still gets it wrong.
Same thing happened with Marley and Me. Thetrailers all looked like a good-time romp and a laugh a minute involving a misbehaving dog. Thne I heard what the story was about and I thought "Wow that is not what the trailers looked like".
Methinks she's slowly morphing into her alter ego, Fiona (Shrek). Which, coincidentally is the only character she's played in the last ten years that I actually liked…guess it's 'cause I didn't have to look at her.
Or "Overload", whatever the case may be.
I didn't see the film but I'd write it so it kills the person who pushes the button. Like here you go jerk you'd kill someone for a million dollars you don't know and you still think your a good person. . . wupz, you don't know you so you just killed yourself. They push the button and bang, dollars explode out of the box and their dead.
This story reminds me of that old joke were some dirty old man says to the hot babe, "I'll give you $20 if you will fool around with me." and the woman gets all like, "I'm not a hooker." then the guy goes, "How about a million dollars?" and the woman goes, "Sure." – punch line – "honey your a hooker we're just haggling over the price." They made a movie on that only instead of a dirty old creep they use Robert Redford before he was a old at least. Remember all the dopey women that announced they would? "Honey. . ."
She's trying, all right.
VERY trying.
Strange yes, that they picked the Carter seventies, where life was crap and people might indeed push a button for money.
I remember the seventies. My dad was always on strike.
Let me guess…the next couple that gets the box pushes the button and kills the previous couple.
Twilight Zone did have it as an episode. The ending was great. The box would be given to someone they did not know!
This sounds like a movie for our times.
The
moviePresident had a lot of promise on the outside but on the inside,viewersAmericans will quickly learn how shallow this box really is.Thanks Rob. That was Hi-lar-i-o!
I'm glad I saw that for free and didn't cough up the $8.00 for the movie.
"So, what could have been an interesting morality tale in and of itself " instead takes the audience into an even stranger world that involves lightning strikes, identity loss, and zombie-like behavior".
Should've called this movie "The Ballot Box".
A slight majority of Americans made a hasty decision and now we're dealing with a bizarre and frightening set of repercussions.
Bummer. The premise sounded good. I am not a huge Cameron "I love Mao, George Bush loves rapists more than women" Diaz fan, but I was intrigued,
About insufficient back story… maybe they assumed everyone would know that the Cape in the 70's was a sad and desperate place. The Apollo program and Spacelab ended, no more defense spending at the close of the war, pre shuttle era… the place was a ghost town. A side note, if you go to that area now, it looks like a 60's throw back place caught in a time warp. Houses are all from the early to mid 60's, public buildings with architecture from that era. Try to find a house built in the 70's or 80's there. I suspect most folks would not know this since most do not know who the VP is.
I love Frank Langella.
The only movie I ever saw where she looked hot was "The Mask". After that, downhill. As if that ain't bad enough, you hear her interviewed and it turns out she's also an idiot.
Saw this on The Twilight Zone a long time ago.
never anything new from Hollywood.
Hey everyone. It has been awhile since I post something here. Figured I would come give you a hard time again. We have 311 subscribers to the paper now. Most of which are Oath Keepers. Many great articles.
If you are tired of getting "scripted news" and want the opinions of your peers. Please sign up for our FREE newspaper. It is NOT an email it is an actual paper that you can hand out to your friends and people who don't know what is going on.
http://MyFreePress.net/subscribe
Most unbelievable phrase I've read all day; "The premise is an interesting one to develop . . . " What could be duller than watching Cameraon Diaz grimace through a 90-minute ethical no-brainer?
I'm chiming in as another who saw this as a half-hour episode of Twilight Zone, and I think Valerie Bertinelli played the female lead. It was great as episodic television … a two hour movie? Not so much.
Folks, do yourselves a favor and find the original short story, written by original Twilight Zone alum Richard Matheson. It was a 1980s Twilight Zone segment; Matheson hated it so much he put his pen name Logan Swanson on it. The short story kicks ass; I don't plan on seeing the movie because I knew there was no way Hollywood could improve on it.
It made an ammusing 1/2 hour on the Twightlight Zone 40 years ago, a paean to Rod Serling, I'll assume the ending has not changed and save my 8 bucks.
JB – you are spot on. Some of my friends make trailers and they are experts at making the film look good, funny, intriguing when the movie itself is a dog -
Perfect review!
She's more like her unlikeable, and unattractive, character from ""Being John Malkovich".
I remember her outlandish statement from 2004… either she's manipulative and intentionally smearing her opposition, or she believes that nonsense and she's even more stupid than she lets on.
Then I hope they get a chance to make the features. I like movies but I have not seen many I would call better than good in the last five years.
Thumbs up on that review!
Apparently I wasn't hammered enough the last time I made a comment like this but what the heck!
I recently claimed Marilyn Monroe wasn't attractive. Well, in comparison Cameran Diaz is downright ugly. Give me Marilyn complete with her terrible acting any day!!
*runs for cover again not that it will do any good*
I dragged my husband to see his ONLY because I like Frank Langella. I knew it would be preposterous. Plus I don't care for Cameron D's political views. It's weird.
Matheson is great. Legend of Hell House is really creepy. Read the whole book in one night. His short stories are great. And his contemporary, charles Beaumont, also wrote great short stories. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Beaumont.
Shame we don't have any great short story writers now.
Sure, I'd push the button. Thousands of people die everyday – - what's one moer. Or better yet what's one less mouth to feed?!
Anyway, maybe the one to die would be the producer of the film.
Saw the movie and I agree with the reviewer. It is one of the worst movies I have ever seen, it makes no sense. People were getting up and walking out and I should have but I thought that they would tie everything together, but they never did.
I'm a big sci-fi fan, but this mess took some turns that it couldn't recover from. There were also lots of unanswered questions and unnecessary scenes that seemed to be put in just so they could use some really cool special effects.
Also, Cameron Diaz used to do a good job in cutesy roles, but she's getting a little long of tooth for those, and mysterious/serious is not her forte. Not to mention a pitiful attempt at a decent accent.
I'm not old enough to remember the heyday of the (original) Twilight Zone and shows like it, but it was because of those shows and the excellent writing that I took a liking to Matheson, Beaumont, Stephen King's early shorter work, and Ray Bradbury, just to name a few, It was people like them that gave me the love of books and how good the written word can be.
There are some writers out there that still work in short form, just not as many since obviously you do not get paid as much for a 5,000 word essay in a magazine compared to a 100,000+ word novel.. There is some hope. Here are a few links to booksellers I deal with that also handle short fiction.
FYI: These guys are horror and suspense publishers but they do still believe in the short story.
http://www.cemeterydance.com/ (Check out their magazine) They also offer signed limited edition books.
http://www.overlookconnection.com/ (good people) Usually you can get back orders on out of print magazine collections from them.
Isn't Cameron Diaz 37 years old and James Marsden about the same? That hardly counts as a young couple.
"The movie then becomes about the consequences of the decision rather than the choice itself, which would have been a far more interesting concept to explore."
Not really. People care about themselves more than other people. If they had to do it themselves–physically, I mean– it would be a different story. But never meeting them, never seeing them? That's not much of a dilemma. Can't care much about a theoretical person.
Not to say I wouldn't call someone who refused to push the button morally superior. It's just that the morally superior choice is so unlikely, and the other choice so natural, that the pull between the two is not that dramatically interesting.
I sure hope they GAVE CREDIT to The Twilight Zone for this one. The Zone was much better than this movie!
I don't know for sure…but I guess these people that "WRITE" these movies much watch a LOT of TV. When you start watchng a movie….it brings to mind other things I have seen already. So I guess if you watch TV a LOT and then write a…movie…you can make money doing just that. Some how I really thought there were laws….then again…maybe NOT!
This box thing was in the new Twlight Zone not any of Rods REAL Twlight Zone showes. The box was in the newer ones….that I really don't care for. Rods TZ was the best.
The box was on not to long ago when they were running a marathon of the Twilight Zone on Chiller or Sci Fi TV.
I love FRANK no matter how BAD the movie he might be in …is! HE was a GREAT drac!!!
Cam and HER views….well HE is what I wanted to watch………….NOT HER!
WARNING SPOILERS!
This was on the "New Twilight Zone" series in the 1980s. Actually, I thought the TV adaptation's ending was better than Matheson's original story which was published in PLAYBOY a couple of years before. In Matheson's version, when the husband pushes the button, his wife dies. When he protests that it was supposed to be someone he didn't know, he is asked "How well does anyone really know anyone else?" which I thought was hokey. The the TZ segment, when the wife pushes the button, the guy who gave them the box just comes back to give them the money and take the box away. When the couple asks him what happens next, he says "You spend the money." When they ask what will happen to the box, he says, "I will give it to someone else. But don't worry–it won't be anyone YOU KNOW." Which I thought was much more chilling.
This is hardly new – the short story goes back to the 70' at least. But I suppose there are young people who have not yet read the ending. It was interesting the first 500 times but it's been done to death.
Not in dog years – it's like over 250!
But heck, she was still OK in Kill Bill right?
- Oh Wait. . . never mind -
It's by the same guy who did Donnie Darko and Southland Tales. I sorta liked Donnie Darko until the stupid ending. I've heard horror stories about Southland Tales and this one. This would be the third strike.
Found it!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Button,_Button_(The_...
Not that I would ever waste my time or money on anything made by the libtards in Hollyweird (including this stupid movie)….but I have noticed that Cameron Diaz is sure looking old and frumpy these days.
Does this remind anyone of an anime series called Death Note?
Cameron Diaz is DUMB as a BOX of rocks.
I remember talking about this with a couple of friends. I said if it happened to me I'd stick my head out the window and go "Okay, where's the camera? I'm on Scare Tactics, aren't I?"
[...] Reviews: 1. John P. Hanlon at Big Hollywood 2. Kurt Loder 3. movieguide.org [Christian Movie [...]
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Potato And Leek Soup It’s a swell dishonour you don’t comprise a free money add! I’d definitely employ money for this howling webpage! That i for the moment state i’ll be mitigated bookmarking with including an individual’s Provender that module my i…
It’s a swell dishonour you don’t comprise a free money add! I’d definitely employ money for this howling webpage! That i for the moment state i’ll be mitigated bookmarking with including an individual’s Provender that module my individual Msn hold. Tha…
puppy breeders The of these blogging engines and CMS platforms is the lack of limitations and inactivity of manipulation that allows developers to finish comfortable thing and ‘skin’ the site in much a way that with minuscule endeavour one would neve…
The of these blogging engines and CMS platforms is the lack of limitations and inactivity of manipulation that allows developers to finish comfortable thing and ‘skin’ the site in much a way that with minuscule endeavour one would never asking what it …
You must be logged in to post a comment.