Review: ‘V’ in the World of ‘O’
by John P. Hanlon
Much has been written about the premiere of the new ABC drama “V” and its relationship to the election last year of President Barack Obama. As an article from the Chicago Tribune noted:
Nominally a rousing sci-fi space opera about alien invaders bent on the conquest (and digestion) of all humanity, it’s also a barbed commentary on Obamamania that will infuriate the president’s supporters and delight his detractors.
While it’s true there are reasons why comparisons between the candidate of hope and the aliens who want change are plentiful, the show “V” is about much more than a critique of the Obama administration.
“V” begins as a show about aliens who suddenly appear in spaceships around the world and the reaction they receive. At first, as can be expected, there is a lot of fear and anguish about the visitors (which is what “V” stands for) as the ships show up hovering above different cities. However, when the alien leader appears on a ship’s video screen and talks about the benefits they will bring to the people of this world, audiences applaud (an unrealistic action, but an important one nonetheless in the development of the program). As the show goes on, though, some people learn that the aliens have more in mind than providing “heal centers” and universal health care for people around the world (which they are in favor of).
As I noted above, there are reasons people are so eager to compare the Obama administration to the alien visitors. The Washington Post recently compared an HBO documentary about the election of Obama to the series premiere of “V.” It noted that…
In ‘V’ (a remake of the early-1980s series), the otherworldly ‘visitors’ want to bring us universal health care. They possess a knack for speechwriting and managing the message. In ‘By the People,’ well . . . same thing!
Another comparison between “V” and Obama’s campaign that many people have focused on, is that young people flock to the visitors in “V” because they find something intriguing and possibly inspiring about them. Unlike many of the adults in the program, adolescents and young people are enticed by the visitors without understanding the consequences of aligning themselves with the alien race without questioning their motives or their intentions.
I do like the political aspect of the show and how it seems timely for many of those who have questioned or disagreed with the Obama administration. Deeper still, though, I think the idea of blind loyalty is a great aspect to the show. With little information known about the aliens upon their arrival, many people embrace this new group without knowing who they really are. The aliens may say the things that people support and they may have all of the right intentions (which they don’t), but people accept them without questioning their true motives. That blind allegiance, which could be compared to any number of people who accept things without asking questions, is a powerful and important aspect of the program.
In addition to that idea, the pilot of the new program introduces a variety of interesting ideas that will likely be explored as the show continues for the next several weeks and in the spring of 2010. One character, played by the boyish Scott Wolf (who has a knack for choosing quality television projects), is torn between being an “actual” reporter and exploring the truth about the visitors or getting attention as the “chosen” reporter who gets the high-profile interviews with the “V” leader (the Barbara Walters for extraterrestrial life forms). Wolf’s character chooses the latter option, at least in the pilot episode, which is the only episode that has aired thus far.
On the show, as the softball interview airs, the show cuts to a meeting where rebels are talking about the hidden plans of the visitors. In other shows, this scene might have seemed too obvious but the scene works here because it creates a clear delineation between the image of the Vs that their leader is trying to present and the conspiracy theories about them that the visitors are trying to quell.
Erica, one of the attendees at that meeting, played by Elizabeth Mitchell from “Lost,” is beginning to understand the true motive of the Vs while her son has been drawn, like a cult member, to them. For the sake of her son, she will likely need to convince him that the visitors are not who he hopes and believes they are.
On the show, there is also the story of a recently-engaged visitor, a traitor to his kind, who has to decide if he wants to join a rebellion against them, and if he wants to reveal the truth about himself to those he loves. Additionally, there is also a storyline about how priests and congregants react to these new alien visitors. With all of these interesting stories, “V” is a show that has a lot of potential to build on.
At the end of the program, Erica turns to a potential ally and notes that the visitors are “arming themselves with the most powerful weapon out there.” When asked what it is, she replies with one simple word: “Devotion.” Soon enough, her son is seen in an alien spaceship pledging his support to the alien race as the leader of the “V” looks on. The show has set up a basic premise with its first episode and if it is able to build on it effectively, it could end up being one of the most interesting and addictive programs of the 2009-2010 television season.





Subscribe via RSS
67 Comments
The media is thinking this show is about Obama (it's not), but since they think it is, and it's an excellent show, watch it and send a message. 14 million viewers so far.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alex Murashko Jr, Big Hollywood. Big Hollywood said: Review: ‘V’ in the World of ‘O’ http://bit.ly/1CarsF [...]
It's almost as if they created this show for what the Obama administration is doing.
If the media truly thinks this show is a reflection of the obama administration, then they don't understand the premise of the show. The V's are a pack of lying lizards with intent to make sushi out of human flesh. The media would not dare out the obama administraton, they adore him too much. Obviously the media has been taken in by obama, I mean Anna.
The only way this could be about Obama is the timing… but how long does it take to run up to a television series release?
Because as far as I can tell, from what's been said about it.. it's pretty much the same as the old version. The old version wasn't about Obama.
OTOH, that some people who are not inclined to criticize Obama see various references as criticism of Obama shows that no matter what the *intent*, it's been hitting some nerves, eh?
"V" is my new favorite TV series, at least for now. I didn't pay it much attention until I saw comments about interesting correlations between the "V" invaders and the "O" minions. I went online to see the pilot and now I'm hooked. I'm convinced that if one of these pr"O"gressives now inhabiting our capital gets a flesh wound we're going to see some green reptilian scales underneath.
Try to catch the next show if you can, we(the real people) should make this the highest rated network show of the season. It will drive the liberals nuts.
I still have not gotten over the fact Hollywood can't seem to come up with any new ideas.
Maybe they need to get out of Politics and get back to writing creative stories. It seems like they beat us poor dumb conservatives over the head with how much more smarter they are, then they rip off every cheesy TV show from the 1970's and 1980's.
Usually the result is worse than the original but with shaky cam and better CGI.
Verne Gay, a moderate to right TV columnist for NYNewsday, thought this was a jab at the Bush administration. I hadn't read his article until AFTER I saw the show and I felt, at the time I was watching it, that it was a barbed commentary on the Obama phenomena. SF has always had, indeed often been informed by, libertarian and often right of centre sensibilities (see Bob Heinlein and the great Gordon Dickson, for starters) as opposed to its more expansive, liberal philosophied wing (Isaac Asimov, Art Clark, Chad Oliver, Mark Clifton, early Bradbury, Fritz Leiber and later, Ursula LeGuin, et al).
This is going to be an interesting show–another imaginative reworking of an old tv warhorse in the vein of Battlestar Galacta. I'm hooked
Steve Stone
One can go to hulu.com to catch the episode. It's so parallel to the O story for those who know the true O story (pack o' lies), I do wonder if it is out there so that "we" seem "crazy" to equate the Visitors and the devotees of the Visitors to Obama and the devotees of Obama…. "Look at those crazy right wing nut jobs, now they're comparing us to the alien visitors!!" I can see the video now… "Let me be clear, I am no reptilian alien like some would have you believe. (chuckle chuckle, nose in the air" Hmmmm? How else is this getting on ABC?
As been said by another in effect, capture the ratings get a renewal, change the plot to get back
in the libs good graces and no ones the wiser. Except conservatives and they count for naught.
Very interesting take Sarah, but even the best laid plans can backfire.
(by the way . . .next resistance meeting – same time, same place)
The thing is, the anti-fascist message in this new show isn't any different than the anti-fascist message in the original show. It's only that liberals think that "fascism" is an idealogue of the right, and to see their precious Obama so closely connected to fascism idealogy threatens their bubble of anti-reality.
Historically Fascism has ALWAYS been an idealogy of the left. It has ALWAYS focused on the youth to get their word out to the street.
Creepy how life imitates art, isn't it? The premise was how a free people might be convinced to connive at their own slavery. Well, folks…..
Without a doubt the best scene is when the MSMedia reporter is taken up to the mother ship to "interview" the visitors and is told by Lady V – "Just be sure not to ask anything that would paint us in a negative light".
Your comment is so true!
The show has been in production a lot longer than Obama has been president. The Lefties are just in a panic because tyranny looks like….them.
I thought the first episode was good but a bit too rushed. However, my understanding is that they condensed six episodes into four. Also, I can totally believe people clapping at their first arrival.
Palin/Bachmann 2012!
There was a lot of good stuff in this show– too much. The things that happened in this hour should have played out over 3 or 4 episodes, it would have been more creepy and convincing as to why some people fell hook line and sinker while others were skeptical. But interesting and we'll see.
Opinion Let me go all insane here and say that Pelosi is a Visitor. The only think that contradicts that is that Pelosi is ugly as sin and all the visitors are pretty pretty. Still if Pelosi is ever autopsied, we might find a lizard inside.
[...] in ‘V’ Chicago Tribune: ‘V’ aims at Obamamania John P. Hanlon, Big Hollywood: Review: ‘V’ in the World of ‘O’ Arizona East Valley Tribune: Brace yourselves: ‘V’ landing on ABC Washington Post: [...]
[...] New York Times brutally slams V and V debuts with MASSIVE ratings John P. Hanlon, Big Hollywood: Review: ‘V’ in the World of ‘O’ Examiner: Is “V” for “Vendetta”? TampaBay.com: ABC’s V remake debuts [...]
Hey, who is the anchor on ABC these days?
"It's almost as if they created this show for what the Obama administration is doing."
Not really since what Obamunist are doing is age old communist/fascist tactics from last century.
Nothing new under the Sun there!
Before the start of WWII Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin/Stalin were adored by leftist and lefty elites in the US. All were just slightly different flavors of socialist dictatorships.
Today's smiley faced fascist like Nancy Pelosi just believe those different stripes of socialist were just meanies and they'll get the socialist thingy just right, THIS TIME!
Put Capitalism on one end of a scale and communism on the other with socialism in between as Lenin said socialism was just a go between to get from Capitalism to communism. Nikika Krsuhchev while banging on a table declared that America will get doses of socialism until one day it wakes to find communism.
Anyhow, along the sliding scale are your liberties. Think about it.
Google "Yuri Bezmenov interview" (oddly enough from 1984) if you want a better explanation of Obamamania and the "yes we can" faithful.
YouTube – Make Mine Freedom (1948)toon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY
Just watched the pilot on Hulu and I thought it was great. Given how much time it takes for a program to be written, produced, and aired I don't think they imagined how prescient the story would be, so my hope is that the writers (and the new producer) will serve the story first in the later episodes so we dont have another Battlestar Galactica which I was interested to see until I read Jonah Goldberg's piece in Commentary:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm...
Just watched the pilot on Hulu and I thought it was great. Given how much time it takes for a program to be written, produced, and aired I don't think they imagined how prescient the story would be, so my hope is that the writers (and the new producer) will serve the story first in the later episodes so we dont have another Battlestar Galactica which I was interested to see until I read Jonah Goldberg's piece in Commentary:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm...
[...] reading here: Review: ‘V’ in the World of ‘O’ This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
these comments are interesting. why are the leftists so up in arms, oops bad puns, about V ? This is a series which came about 26 years ago on NBC (do I sense a connection, way back then ?) so how could this series be aimed at barry & co. when it first came out during the reagan administration ? i think Jane Badler played the role of Diana, V leader so much better then this actress who played Anna. BTW, I skipped watching it, in favor of NCIS, saw it much later on hulu.
I think it's funny how thin skinned these people in the Obama administration are. Any critic of them (implied or not) they get their panites in a wad. I've watched the pilot of the new "V" twice now and not one time did they mention the One by name. He's so full of himself that everything must be about him.
Anita Dunn has to be a visior with all that tongue flicking she did in that video Fox showed of her. My dad has said for the last 17 years that James Carville was one.
True conservatives are awaiting the sequel – "W"
The only thing I noticed that was different from the original miniseries and its sequel and TV show was the meaning of what V really stands for. Uh, yeah, the aliens are called the Visitors in both. Both have butt kissing reporters sucking up to the leader with sexual undertones involved. In the original the reporter is a woman and the leader a man, the new version have the roles reversed but the blatant sexual attraction is the same.
I read here at BH that the new version was written and developed during Bush's term. SO that probably does explain why the main symbolism of the this new version is so very different. They kept the big red V with the drips, but they obviously didn't understand (or didn't what to understand) that the the drips aren't blood and the V doesn't represent the Visitors.
It was the sign of the Resistance. The Rebels used red spray paint to mark the invaders propaganda.
V meant Victory.
A word that is foreign to everybody these days. It seems.
'V' in this new updated version, may well be a commentary on this administration.
I still think Nancy Pelosi is a Reaver!
look closely…..it is only the thinnest of human-skin veneer – and for every face lift…it gets thinner and her true reptile will come through…..
No, not all the Vs are pretty. Only the acknowledged ones are pretty. The long-time infiltrators and moles look just like us — e.g. the shaggy hair 50-year-old terrorist that Erica is tracking when she stumbles across the anti-V group. Also another character who I won't name for spoiler-sake, but you know who really shocked her socks off when it was revealed to be an undercover V — that one looked totally ordinary, not pretty, although a little on the slim side for normal, but they're all NY/Holly actors after all.
So Big P still could be a V, albeit undercover.
Knowing Ho'wood and the Lefty drivel they spew out, the show was written and produced to show us just how bad Bush was/is. That they accidentally "outed" Obama probably shocks them more than it does us.
"Maybe they need to get out of Politics and get back to writing creative stories"
AMEN.
Or maybe they could option some books like Klavan's "Empire of Lies" or some of the thrillers coming out casting Muslims as terrorists (imagine that) or maybe even remake the Clancy thriller as it was written instead of substituting neo Nazis. (How many people have Neo-Nazis killed in the last decade?) "No Prayers for the Assassin" would make a great thriller, Just a few suggestions. Or then maybe they could just keep rewriting the "Bush is bad, lefties are good" screenplay.
Stalin, Lenin et al were "thin-skinned" too. It's the nature of the beast.
The show was sophomoric, simplistic and just plain awful. About the only thing it had going for it was the vague similarities it had with the current administration, a vapid, shallow, ego-driven leader and her desire to be perfect. Had it not been for those small barbs and innuendos, I would have turned the channel shortly after it started but I won’t suffer through a second episode. Just like the current administration, one show was enough.
IT'S A COOKBOOK!
I'd like to see "Sum of all Fears" done like "V",done with a Hitckcock suspense style.
They still do news? Who knew….
Is it just me, or are Pelosi's boobs starting to sag like the old woman down around the waist thing?
No, that would be the country club republicans big spenders.
Great, isn't freedom and liberty wonderful? You just change channels and we'll all be happy campers.
V looks like a pretty fun metaphor for any totalitarian group, be they Russian communists, space lizards, or homegrown Reds. Obama isn't original (and as far as I can see, he isn't very bright) and his attempt to turn America into a communist society is meeting as much resistance as any past one.
The fun part of V is going to be watching the revolution take hold. Kind of like attending Tea Parties this summer.
Yay, Tea Parties – the new Resistance! How does it feel to be a dangerous, edgy radical!
[...] And I found something at “Big Hollywood” too. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)UFC 103 Results: Live Updates Franklin vs. [...]
As you see, I've linked this. Scary, isn't it?
A favorite novel by 'conservative' Robert Heinlein is 'Revolt in 2100', in which the hero must overthrow the evil, repressive US government because it has been taken over by religious zealots. That's my kind of conservative!
Make mine Freedom
watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfBj2H6oxog
Having watched the original V and watching it again just a week ago I don't know if I can stay with this one. I watched the Hulu presentation and it seems to follow the original with minor changes in characters. The slick special effects were good. No problem with the Actors they will grow on us. I guess we will see.
It would be nice if they would hire some writers with new ideas. I guess it's a lot cheaper when you use old scripts.
I bet that by no more than six episodes in this series quickly degenerates into moral equivalence ("The Visitors are just doing what they believe is right and who are we to judge their culture?") and harsh criticism against religious/political conservatives ("The Visitors came here to modernize our society but the gun-toting Chrisitan rebels in America attacked the Visitors because the Visitor's superior science and culture interfered with their hateful religious fundamentalist views!").
Who wants to take that wager?
I think it's hysterical that they started production of this in the Bush years and yet Obama fits it so well.
It's sort of like how Mark Levine wrote "Liberty and Tyranny" and the Obama administration fits the profile of the Statist.
To all you Obamabots.. dont you find it strange that your guy is coincidently matching the description of tyranny , completely unintended by the creators?
I think it will descend into campiness or watered down (which i think is what you said)
What I want to see is some budding film student take footage of our Dear Leader and superimpose it on the spaceship hovering over our cities.
Notice how the youngsters are portrayed as dumb and stupid, following their leader blindly like braindead zombies, in "V"…..life imitating art.
What's the true difference between Obama and Anna? One is a bloodthirsty lizard bent on the destruction of mankind, and the other is from outer space.
Is that the psycho doctor chick from "Lost"?
It is, isn't it?
Love the "new" V, and my husband and I thought the same thing about the correlation to our current government and the Visitors. They arrived preaching about "hope" and are something entirely different under the fake skin. It will be fun to watch the V traitors and the "good guys" take down the Visitors – hopefully in real life too :0)
Why do the aliens have to be reptilian killers?
Hollywood always seems to want to appeal to our most debased need to hate people who are different from us. Like we are all too stupid to get "it."
It would be much more interesting to have the aliens be nearly identical to us physically, just more advanced. Their evil motive of control or extermination could still be there. The actors (and the audience) could remain very confused as to who is who in the story. It would be fresh and interesting. They way it is written today once we physically see the Visitors it won't matter what the say or do– the youth, adults…everyone is going to want to be rid of them. It would be a much more profound approach if the physical element was actually removed. The politics, freedom vs. security, liberty vs. oppression could be played out even much better than having typical monsters involved. And some earthlings would continue to be devoted to them even after the real intentions are revealed. There is a lot of space there to explore.
Actually, I think it would be more interesting if the aliens were totally alien, maybe heavy-G gas giant natives so weird that we can't even comprehend them at all. So good luck talking them into not dis-assenbling our planet to make way for that hyper-space bypass, chum…
It is.
'Cause it's creepier to think about being eaten by bugs.
Yeah, but that has been done 100s of times. If they are nearly identical, still able to distinguish by looking very closely, the story could be about bondage or servitude or some offer form of oppression. They would not have a stomach for eating us anyway. It might be less creepy, but in some ways, we could better explore the space of how Hitler could have come to power with his agenda or how the Bolshevik revolution took place. Just a thought.
It's a metaphor… cold blooded, slimy, devious, forked tongue… just like the typical corrupt politician. Sci Fi is big on metaphor.
Wish I'd said that. Good one.
This is the comment I was referring to. Wish I'd said that. Good one.
It's an old joke but I'm laughin'!
You must be logged in to post a comment.