Jon Stewart: Andrew Breitbart ‘May Be the Most Honest Person in This Entire Story!’
by Hollywoodland| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Lost in Race | ||||
|
||||
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Lost in Race | ||||
| www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
|
||||
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: Andrew Breitbart, Daily Show, jon stewart, NAACP, Obama, Shirley Sherrod
Posted Jul 27th 2010 at 2:45 pm in Political Humor, Video |
379086124 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fhollywoodland%2F2010%2F07%2F27%2Fjon-stewart-andrew-breitbart-may-be-the-most-honest-person-in-this-entire-story%2FJon+Stewart%3A+Andrew+Breitbart+%27May+Be+the+Most+Honest+Person+in+This+Entire+Story%21%272010-07-27+21%3A45%3A32Hollywoodlandhttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D379086
Conservatives will start rolling their eyes early on in the new movie "Safe House." Denzel Washington stars as a rogue CIA agent who turns himself in to U.S. authorities, and before you can say "human rights abuse" his character undergoes a waterboarding treatment. Had "Safe House" come out five...






124 Comments
Rock on General! I am NOT a fan of Jon Stewart, but he makes good points here. AB makes NO bones about where he stands politically and what his intentions are. But, it really pisses me off that the MSM is STILL saying that the tape was edited. It was NOT edited- it's a clip and news organizations use clips all the time! Yes, I've seen the whole video and the CLIP gives the idea of what Sherrod was saying.
BTW, it's amazing how Sherrod just fell off the front pages since claiming AB wanted blacks to be slaves again. Hmmmm. Gotta love it!
The other part of this story that is not being reported, w/ the exception of FNC, is that on the tape she goes on to say it IS a matter of black and white, AND rich vs. poor. So she clearly IS racially biased and promoting class warfare to boot. The bottom line is someone with an outed leftist agenda like her, should NOT be working for the Federal government at the expense of our tax dollars!
what is really sad is that she's going off the assumption that the majority of welfare recipients are Black, whereas if my memory serves me, the majority of welfare recipients are rural whites.
Her attitude is despicable not just for her disparaging perspective, but even more dastardly she is operating on the assumption that blacks NEED welfare more than any other ethnicity.
How exactly does this boost anyone's initiative or even self-esteem for that matter?
When she continues to talk about other races as "them" and "their kind," etc., it should be pretty clear where her heart still lies. If she had an epiphany that racial prejudice was wrong, then she shouldn't still be talking about it as if there is a division because in her mind there shouldn't be.
The media could use this and refrain from their own practice of using clips taken out of context to smear people on the right. Or am I barking up the wrong tree here?
…using clips taken out of context to smear people on the right.
But….that's their mission statement.
Stewart is calling Andrew "honest" for being a liar who is upfront about his intentions. Did any thought AT ALL precede posting this video here?
In other news, pigs have just taken flight.
What is also not discussed in the MSM is how positively the NAALCP audience reacts to her tales of black on white racism.
Its clear that there are many in the audience that are disappointed she learned to stop hatin' on crackers.
I watched the entire speech of Ms. Sherrod – and it's racist. Yes, she admits it was wrong to discriminate against a white farmer on the basis of his race but if you will watch closely, that admission is not an act of conscience but self-preservation – she was scared of losing her job. That is the only reason why she gave him help – but even then, it was totally racist – she refused to help him but instead sent him to a lawyer who was 'one of his own kind' – i.e., white. The terms by which she describes that farmer reveal that her contrition for racism is all show. Watch her body language as she practically laughs out loud as she reveals her discrimination of a white farmer (and the audience is amused as well), etc., and lastly her racist self-pity in the news after all of this blew up.
In short, Ms. Sherrod is a racist who was caught on tape and who now thinks she should get a pass simply because she mouthed a few PC words during her speech. The truth is that Ms. Sherrod merely talked the talk but she didn't walk the walk of confronting the evil of black racism against whites. As is proven by her body language, her laugh, and her denigration of whites in that tape (not to mention her accusation that Breitbart wants all black people go to back into slavery) this woman was then and still is racist.
So, she sent the farmer to "one of his own kind." Nope, not racist at all. I encourage every white person to try this and see how well this goes over for ya.
Stewart looks like a young Col. Sanders.
That was damn funny!
Stewart can suck-up to Andrew Breitbart all he'd like, I still won't lower myself to watch his lefty mouthpiece, sounding board, propaganda producing Daily Show…………………………..fuk him, loser.
Ops, silly me. I should try to get more sleep before I post.
It is good to see that Stewart is no longer so enamored of the One that he won't make fun of him. As for the story, it's one of those post-modern deals where everyone is the bad guy and even the one you want to root for makes you feel dirty. Nice accent by the alpaca fighter though.
No wonder we haven't heard anything from Retracto the Correction Alpaca.
That was GREAT!!!! Don't watch Jonathan Lebowitz much but maybe he is waking up a bit, possibly? Anyway, that was hilarious. ROCK ON AB!!!!
I agree with you, Abe. Stewart said Andrew was honest about being dishonest. Clear as a bell
Yes, Sherrod was great for the left when it seemed like she might bring Breitbart down, but her smearing of all conservatives, Tea Partiers, and Fox News as racists in virtually every interview she did must have made them realize this one would soon backfire on them if they didn't drop her like a hot potato. My guess is we've seen the last of Shirley Sherrod, at least as far as MSM interviews go, but keep those cell phone cameras filming citizen journalists, somehow I think we'll be seeing more of Mrs. Sherrod and her assuredly 100 percent non-racist statements.
No one that I know cares one whit what Stewart has to say about ANYTHING. He's a comedian. He's NOT a reporter and he's not even a news READER. He makes stuff up as he goes along.
No one that I know cares one whit what Stewart has to say about ANYTHING.
Sure, and Pauline Kael didn't know anybody who voted for Nixon either.
Just because you and I don't personally know anyone who's stupid enough to get their news from Jon Stewart, that doesn't mean there aren't people like that out there.
Hey, Alaska. What is also being left off the front pages is the fact that the audience was agreeing with Sherrod like they were at Sunday service BEFORE the revelation that her point was one of racial harmony. The crowd became noticeably more quiet when she quoted Toni Morrison, "race exists but it doesn't matter" and said we need to work together.
My conclusion: Racism and bigotry run rampant at the NAACP.
As far as Stewart goes he couldn't be more dishonest. He tells us that Sherrod's father was murdered by a white farmer and an all-white grand jury didn't indict anyone. Stewart says he may be old fashioned because he thinks it's okay to hate the "thing" that killed your father. But to assume that the white jury didn't indict a white man without giving any more information about the case is racist. Sorry, Jon. You're racist.
Next Stewart is going to the Best of Bush segment. I guess being a progressive has become overrated.
I think that is what Stewart meant but he doesn't say that outright. He only said that Brietbart was clear about his intentions and let everyone know up front and even without any assumption of dishonesty at all anyone ought to have made sure they got the other side of the story before acting on it.
Stewart also clearly realizes that the other side of the story is that the Obama administration shows no loyalty to any employee or member of the administration and will fold immediately and, as became a meme even before he was elected, throw them under the bus. The whole skit up there was about just that.
There is a severe lack of leadership going on, but it's pretty much standard operating procedure.
And Stewart gets something right that I've only heard Althouse mention (not that I hear so very much, but she did mention this) that no matter what someone thinks of Brietbart's motivation or the validity of criticizing Sherrod, he didn't force anyone to do anything. Nor did FOX. The actions of the NAACP and the Obama administration are entirely unforced errors. It's such a incomprehensible way to respond on both their parts that a person almost has to wonder if there was more to it than incompetence. And Stewart, as far as I'm concerned, doesn't have to suddenly consider himself on *our* side in order for anyone to appreciate him shining a light on it.
As for Stewart implying that Brietbart is an honest liar… I have a suspicion that Brietbart would approve the posting here. We are not all so insecure, are we?
Nailed it, Carolyn!
I wondered if the references to an alpaca fight club weren't deliberate.
One of the few funnier pieces to come out of Stewart, right next to his reaction to the ACORN tapes, which I set aside as one of the greatest moments of Comedy Central history (not that there's many moments on there worth that much). That being said, I did still feel that the full tape of Sherrod had a racial divide sprinkling, saying "their kind", "them", etc., thinking of a race as a collective. Of course she couldn't go out without dishing out the Left's favorite flavor: Chunky Class Warfare.
I think the MSM only backed away because she began smearing "the Right", Tea Parties, Fox News, and Breitbart as racist crypto-Klansmen every time they talked to her. Never mind that Breitbart didn't edit that tape and didn't call for her to be fired for that matter, while NAACP had (but didn't watch) the full tape but still called for her to step down. Never mind that Glenn Beck, who was used as a threat against Sherrod by the White House, was the first person to demand her be given an apology along with her job back. Never mind that 32 men, who just happen to be black, are running as Republicans (among them is Allen West, who is a big Tea Party candidate).
It's not like that smear campaign isn't failing enough already and there's no room on board that sinking ship for her to fit with the rest of the MSM.
It brings me little consolation to hear Stewart be critical of the one he adored and helped to get elected. Maybe a little more critical thought before the election would have served us all better.
Now if Jon Stewart was only important enough that the rest of the Libs would see this ManChild POTUS for what he really is.
Maybe if Roman Polanski would say how pathetic Hussein Obama really is the whole world might open their eyes
You know … I really don't have a problem with her saying that line. I do believe that her actions, 25 years ago, had a racist vaneer to it. And she should be held accountable – as should anyone involved in an incident such as this. But the reason I don't have a problem with it is because she was talking "to her own kind".
This is made obvious by the agreeing hoots and hollers during her speech. And they came during the most obnoxious part of her speech. It just showed that she was talking to people who she understood and who understood her.
The bigger problem for me is that this speech took place earlier this year, and the actions of the crowd was more telling than her story. And that is Breitbart's point which everyone in the MSM is missing.
I think that is what Stewart meant but he doesn't say that outright.
He doesn't say it outright? Obviously if he had done so people wouldn't be fool enough to applaud the video here. It's pretty damn obvious, but if people want to get their jollies out of watching someone on the left attacking the left from the left, then I suppose you're right. I shouldn't be so insecure as to feel embarrassed when people on the right react emotionally rather than rationally and the subtext goes right over their heads.
ITA 100% When the MSM realized what Sherrod was they dropped her like a hot potato. In every interview I saw she called basically anyone who questioned her authenticity "racist" and with the whole AB "wants blacks to be slaves again", I think that even the MSM realized that she had gone too far. This way, she can still kinda be a heroine to the left . . .
ITA. The audience was CLEARLY with her and had no idea where she was going to end up at the end of her speech with her "redemption" (which really wasn't IMHO)
And, with regards to the white farmer killing her father and that making it "O.K." to hate whites (which seems to be what Stewart is implying), it just doesn't compute. My uncle was robbed at gunpoint by a black man, but doesn't hold that against ALL black men (nor does it give him the right to do so).
Wow, beautifully put. Her smearing everything and anything every time a camera was around is obviously why the MSM suddenly quit interviewing her. That way, they can still keep her as a kinda heroine. And, no, IMHO, class warfare is no better than racism. It's just another form of bigotry. Without the rich, where would this country be? I forget who said it, but "I never got a job from a poor man!".
I don't think he was praising AB for being "honest about being dishonest", but rather being honest about his INTENTIONS. AB used a CLIP, which is what he had and which, IMHO, was very representative of the entire speech, as a clip should be. He edited nothing.
That's the most of Jon Stewart's show I've ever watched. I can't say I enjoyed it, but that was the least sick I ever got. We got the alpaca reference. Subtle. Smooth. Very clever indeed.
Now. We're waiting for Stewart actually to hear out the whole story before HE jumps to conclusions.
MyKu:
Problem has been solved!
(Since the Left gets news mostly
from the Daily Show.)
Reeeaallllly? Does anyone doubt that Stewart will revert to leftist form when it really matters? Let me know when Stewart gets a leftist fatwa declared against him.
But does the sub-text go over their heads?
Of course Stewart isn't trying to say something nice about Brietbart but I think it probably makes what he did say even stronger. Everyone else is playing games while Brietbart isn't hiding anything at all.
Breitbart clearly 'sandbagged' the lefties on this one !! I am so proud of him I could just poop …Hey trolls out there..Hows it feel ? hahahahahahahahaha
—
That is the only reason why she gave him help – but even then, it was totally racist – she refused to help him but instead sent him to a lawyer who was 'one of his own kind' – i.e., white.
—
No offense, but you didn't watch the full speech because the story didn't end at that point. In the full speech Sherrod stated that months after she referred the farmer to the lawyer, the farmer called her and told her the lawyer wasn't helping him and that he was going to lose his farm, so she stepped in once again and helped him save his farm. Sherrod finished her story by stating that its about opportunity, not race and that God helped her move past the (racial) hatred that was once in her heart.
Below is a link to a transcript of the speech and an interview with the farmer in question (who says she was the one who helped him save his farm).
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/shirleys... http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2010/07/20/sp...
For once, Jon Stewart was right.
Andrew Breitbart was, and still is, the most honest person in the Sordid Shirley Sherrod Saga.
Yes, kicking the farmer to the lawyer because she didn't want to help a white man was racist, but her story didn't end there. After Sherrod kicked the guy to the lawyer, the lawyer didn't help the farmer, so Sherrod stepped back in and helped him save his farm (see the links in the post right above this one).
Given how popular a topic of conversation the tape is, I'm surprised so few people seem to have watched the whole speech.
Jon Stewart has made a career out of taking people out of context. He doesn't have the intellectual sincerity to cast any blame about this Sherrod business.
Dear god, it sickens me to no end to say that Jon Stewart has more journalist integerty than the entire MSNBC line up. How sad is that.
Yngblk – I did see the full speech which means I saw her admit the real reason she helped that white farmer. Look at how she describes that scene wherein she 'helped' that white farmer – it was actually something different. It was her, as a black woman, bragging to a room of NAACP how she was so much smarter than a white lawyer – i.e., she knew Bankruptcy law better than he. That was the real reason. She's already revealed her antipathy to whites – defining them as 'their kind' – she then moves on in the speech to admit she also hates attorneys. (That's what she says, in her own words.) So slapping that white attorney down was a twofer. Yes, it resulted in the white farmer being helped, but the real reason was because it allowed her to gloat on how superior she was to a white lawyer. (Quite ironic given that the reason she used to justify her initial racist reaction to the white farmer was that – 'he was trying to make me think he was superior to me'.) I totally grant that her actions with the lawyer which resulted in legal protection for the white farmer, could be seen as her moving past race – I definitely would have interpreted it that way myself. Until I listened to Ms. Sherrod proudly finish her speech by remarking how a white president (Bush) has made things terrible whereas a black president (Obama) has made things better. Not that she doesn't distinguish Obama as smart, good, honest, politically savvy, etc. – but by his race. He is a 'black' President. She makes no bones about it – it's up front. This woman distinguishes people by their race. And if there were any question that her mind interprets things in terms of race, that question is answered by how she attacked Breitbart when this whole thing blew up. She accused him of being a racist who wanted to put 'black people back into slavery'.
Come ON! We're supposed to believe that this woman is beyond racism when she defines people by their race (the farmer, the farmer's attorney, both Presidents, etc.) and accuses another person of a racism when he is completely innocent of it? The adage 'actions speaks louder than words' is what damns Ms. Sherrod – and they are her own actions. I repeat myself – she merely talks the talk but she does not walk the walk of moving beyond race. Oh, sure, she'll utter a few PC words here and there – but in the end they're just words, not deeds. When all is said and done, this woman defines people in terms of race – i.e., she is racist.
Too right! That is what he does each and every show!
I didn't watch the video. I have enough trouble with my stress levels already. I'm just wondering if I am the only one who's noticed that he looks more and more like Vladimir Lenin every day?
I can't watch it…he literally turns my stomach. He's got to be kidding the the little beard thingy.
How funny to hear Stewart talk about edited videos. The guy is the king of taking stuff out of context with edited clips to make the people he's lampooning look bad.
You are right-on , Carolyn. You explain it so well!
I suspected the reason the NAACP AND the White House knee-jerked reacted to "the tape" before they watched the entire tape is because they KNOW what she's capable of saying….because of how she really feels. In the beginning, I actually defended her when I first heard the story…from Fox even! Then when the WH & NAACP retracted & started with this "snookered" stuff….I knew something didn't add up. Once they watched the tape & saw what she'd said (still racist, but for some reason there's a double-standard of what racism toward white people is allowed)–then they (NAACP & WH & Vilsack) came out saying they made a mistake. But it was ONLY after they realized she hadn't said anything that they know she's capable of…and has said in the past. Given how her husband feels, I see it runs in the family.
Yes–Ms Sherrod still has a ways to go in her "epiphany". And I don't give her a pass as Jon Stewart does that she is allowed to "hate white people" for the crime & injustice done to her father. "Those" white people are not "all" white people. With THAT kind of thinking….we'd NEVER get past hate of any kind. Does that mean the white person whose loved one has been killed by a black person has the same excuse to hate "all" black people now? No, it doesn't.
I know I'm late for the party here but I gotta say the Federal Government is slam full of commie types working within the 'bureaucracy'. Where else can a commie work? Oh. wait, the MSM.
the left moonbats know the difference between edited and excerpt, they are just playing the game that they play all along….Sherrod also implies that Obama is the victim of racism, so who the hell are any of these people trying to fool?
She never stated or implied she was smarter than the lawyer, she mentioned that the lawyer took the farmer's money for six months and didn't do anything, offering the rationalization that the couple was too old to farm anyway.
—
He had been paying the lawyer since November, and this was May. And the lawyer sat there and looked at him and said, "Well, y'all are getting old. Why don't you just let the farm go?" I could not believe he said that, so I said to the lawyer — I told him, "I can't believe you said that." I said, "It's obvious to me if he cannot file a Chapter 12 bankruptcy to — to stop this foreclosure, you have to file an 11. And the lawyer said to me, "I'll do whatever you say….whatever you think" — that's the way he put it. But he's paying him. He wasn't paying me any money, you know. So he said — the lawyer said — he would work on it.
And then, about seven days before that land would have been sold at the courthouse steps, the farmer called me and said the lawyer wasn't doing anything.
Hai u guiyz. I'm white and I told a story at the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People) about how I discriminated against black people – of which the audience wildy applauded. But then I offered up some tired platitudes about how we all have to work together, so it's kewl. And oh yeah, my husband is an admitted anti-black white nationalist. I'm definitely not racist though. And the media and Jon Stewart will definitely play damage control for me for sure. Hurrr.
Also, Sherrod stated she believes most lawyers, black and white, are dishonest, and that the few honest lawyers she worked with were white.
—
But we kept working at it. And we found some honest lawyers — they were white. I wish I could say that about all lawyers, especially black lawyers, but they will nickel and dime you to death. I don't have — sorry — I don't have two dozen pennies for most lawyers. But anyway that land has been saved, you know.
—
It is becoming more and more likely she only 'helped' that farmer because one of her superiors made her.
Bottom line – Sherrod is a racist and marxist no matter how you slice it. The video, whether the clip originally provided or the whole tape, proves it. If there was any lingering doubt about this, Shirley further proved this while whoring her 15 minutes of fame on CNN and other news organizations. There is a reason we haven't heard from her lately – she was single-handedly hanging herself and the Administration by her ignorant statements on national TV. Obviously she is "sue happy" (I would love to have someone look much, much further into the Pigford case) so it will be interesting if she is so disillusioned by the grandeur of her self-imposed victimhood that she has the gall to try to sue Breitbart. Of course she would lose as Breitbart has video in her own words whereas she, without any proof, accused Breitbart and many other law-abiding, self-reliant Americans of racism. Typical liberal – do what I want you to do, not as I do.
And Hell is experiencing an unusual cold front.
"This administration is so sorry that you people suck so bad." Isn't that how Obama and his cronies feel about all Americans?
I just remember saying "it's not how I vote" when this collasal waste of time, Breitbart concocted, newstory hit the media. It, like financial reform being "a bail out of BP", or any of innumerable other truth twistings that go on here, is what we can expect.
Breitbart feeds his sh$t to the media to distract from real things that actually affect YOU, like the passage of reforms that help YOU. The timing was as deliberate as that select piece of tape. Wake up.
Stay classy.
And the sheeple continue to gobble Breitbart's Sh#t attempts at journalism.
Sometimes comedians are the best way to put it back in your face. Stewart wasn't "sucking up" to Breitbart. He pointed to him and his destroy the "left institution" mantra and simply identified that dishonesty can be expected if it achieves the goal. Welcome to Breitbart'dum.
"didn't edit that tape"
Yeah, so by your standard the leader of the Tea-Party is indeed a racist because one continuous section of his tape, where he racially mocked, makes it so. FYI, If Breitbart can take this single clip from a context we know nothing else about, then you either have to have a double standard, or agree that a leader of your organisation was a total racist. Which is it?
The objective of comedy takes no prisoners. Breitbart slays only the left.
Not much Logic there, Cowboy. Stewart appropriately identified Breitbart's goal to destroy the "left institution". That was the "honest" thing about him. What he pathologically stoops to to reach that objective is what we should expect. Breitbart will flame out from a story like this, if not because of this story. The media has jerks on both the left and the right. The ones who blow up Pintos never last long.
Yeah, the difference is he's a comedian, while Breitbart passes himself off as a journalist.
Normally, I don't thumb-down obvious trolling, but that was pretty pathetic even for trolling. Please try harder next time.
Stewart is right every now and then, but his dismissal of the Black Panthers via bad joke still pisses me off.
People fail to recognize the 'big picture.' The purpose of Mr. Breitbart's video of Sherrod was not to directly attack Sherrod, but to present the vitriolic hypocrisy of the Left, and Black Supremacist groups; before Sherrod ever arrived at the 'moral' of her story, they audience cheered and clapped upon hearing her vile racist emotions and thoughts
No one will take any responsibility? Give me a break, Stewart. Everyone involved in this story has been bending over backwards to acknowledge mistakes and apologize to this woman.
I give absolutely no kudos to Stewart for this clip, who – newsflash! – is not throwing a compliment to Breitbart. What he's saying is, "Look, this guy makes no bones about being a dishonest, agenda-driven, right wing nut who aims to destroy the Left at any cost."
I love Breitbart, and I love his websites. I'm disappointed with him and this story, however, because we need to uphold a higher standard. The Leftist media is just waiting for us to make any little mistake. I think Breitbart has been more than forthright in his explanation of things, but it doesn't matter. Just look at how the MSM continues to salivate over this.
I still don't like the fact that they portrayed AB as though he was up to something deceitful.
"Return to Slavery" I swear this is the 3rd time I've heard this moronic statement spew from the left in recent history. Are people just mimicking the Whoopie Goldberg 'think tank' or is this line of drivel a mandatory part of the playbook? (I'm no longer invited to the DNC-SEIU-Journolist-CPUSA daily conference calls so I'm a bit out of touch)
That would end the state run media if they had to show more than a clip. Breitbart put out all videos he had and this one got picked up because she is a racist.
Do you think what she said was racist or not? Do you think what her husband said was racist or not. Who is the racist person here. Sherrod or Breibart. Be honest.
also, Gibbs looks like Sloth from Goonies film:
http://tinyurl.com/2dfxk8o
Thank you, AK!
Exactly. He's huge with the younger, liberal crowd.
You know all we ask is that people be fair to us and not treat us with hatred. If you think Stewart is even handed, you don't have a clue what is going on.
Her father was killed by a neighbor over a dispute over cattle. Perhaps you are missing some of the relevant facts, too. I don't think it had anything to do with race, it had to do with the neighbor thinking that he stole his cows.
Could it be that Sherrod is more relevant than Obama?
For modern liberals anything that doesn't promote their cause is deceitful.
Oh. Wait, both.
Agreed. Mr. Beitbart deserves a much better class of trolls around here.
Agreed, keep your distance from all lawyers unless you personally know them. I do know one, he's related by marriage, sort of (long story), and I've used him in the past.
But I keep as much distance as I can with the rest.
Sherrod, the NAALCP and the White House are the racists here.
They are the ones who are interested primarily in race, hence they are racists.
Trust me, Stewart's lips are still firmly attached to Obama's ass. The only time he does anything like this is when the news is so big he can't ignore it.
Stewart ain't waking up. If he wants to keep any credibility as even pretending to report news, he can't pass up ones that are this big.
So he makes his cute little faces, proves to every one how unbiased he is, and then goes back to business as usual.
He's not even a comedian. A true comedian would never ignore all the material available on the left. For a true comedian the joke is everything, no matter who gets dinged. Parker & Stone of South Park are true comedians.
Actually his demographics are I think 40 – 50 year old males.
Wouldn't surprise me if the White House whispered in her ear 'shut up, we'll get you some cushy no-show job once the story dies down, but only if you stay off the radar.'
I assume you have some sort of proof that who ever sent the video sent the entire thing and not just that cut?
After all, we all know how modern liberals are all about justice and truth. So if you could please share that I'd appreciate it.
not only that, but she and her husband and others sued the fed gov and collected MILLIONS…and NOW, or rather she did, work for the gov??? i thought that if you worked for the gov you couldn't sue it…i know that service men can't sue the gov…and yes she is a commie….this suit was over a land commune in georgia in the 70's
Awe, does that hurt your little lefty feelings? You trolls are so cute when you get all worked up into a self righteous lather. I especially like the little spittle that drips from the corners of your mouths. Just adorable.
Tell me there Wheely, did you get all worked up over Rathergate? How about Charlie Rangel? Did you get so worked up that you peed a little when you found out Rev. Wright is a racist anti-Semite? How about when half of Obama's secretaries turned out to be tax cheats, which means we're (you and I) pay more because they are too important to pay taxes?
Any of that bother you? Even a little?
You should try out our Society of Pallor some time. We don't even have to wear sheets anymore.
Pretty much.
you certainly have the sheeple part right…..you trolls on the left have no problem naming your victims and using them until it's their turn under the bus
Wow, you managed to get some big words in there, impressive. The extra tutoring you're getting from your third grade teacher is really starting to pay off.
Tell your mommy I said good work when she tucks you in your crib tonight.
Agreed. That's they way I took it the first time I saw it. Sherrod was just collateral damage.
You must be logged in to post a comment.