Daily Gut: Osama’s Green Plan!
by Greg GutfeldSo what happens when the world’s worst person agrees with you on a contentious issue?
Well, it should make you reconsider your view, on said contentious issue.
You’d think that, anyway.

Take Osama bin Laden, who, in a very eloquent and articulate message just released on audiotape, warns us of the dangers of global warming – blaming the US and other industrialized countries for rising temperatures. He says, the only way to stop climate change, is to employ drastic solutions to help bring our economy to a halt. He added that the world should boycott American products, and have more sex with goats.
Now what’s entertaining about this latest message isn’t that Osama wants to have sex with goats (we knew that already), but how his environmental message fits so seamlessly with all that relentless blather heard at the Copenhagen climate conference. My God, he could have been an advisor on “An Inconvenient Truth,” a featured blogger at the Huffington Post, or command the midnight slot on MSNBC (he’d get better ratings). His opinions so perfectly reflect those entities, you’d think he’d be a natural choice for the Media Matter’s advisory board.
And yes, I believe they have an opening – and you know they’re okay with the goat thing.
Anyway, when a person finds out that a mass murderer shares his beliefs, shouldn’t he then rethink his beliefs? Shouldn’t Al Gore finally admit that his extreme climate change dogma is more anti-human than pro-planet – when the man responsible for killing thousands of innocent people turns out to be a big fan?
Eh.
Maybe that truth is too inconvenient.
And if you disagree with me, you’re probably a racist pedophile who doesn’t recycle.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
101 Comments
I think Osama could be Ellie Light! Did anyone check his email lately? Oh, I forgot. WiFi doesn't work in those pesky caves. Must be a bummer not to be able to keep up with the rest of the world on the internet. Although, I hear Osama does blog on huffie post. It just takes him a long time to respond with those slow Islamodonkey mailmen and all.
[...] a shock. Both Obama and Osama Bin Laden believe in the same thing! They both blame America for global warming. In Osama’s second audio tape of the month, Osama [...]
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&...
Oh Yeah! Satellite! But wouldn't we pick up on that with the global hawk flying 24/7 over Pakistan and Afghanistan and send in a predator? Hummm… Maybe we did already… Give him a taste of Global Warming…. No wonder Osama is pissed.
"Anyway, when a person finds out that a mass murderer shares his beliefs, shouldn’t he then rethink his beliefs? Shouldn’t Al Gore finally admit that his extreme climate change dogma is more anti-human than pro-planet – when the man responsible for killing thousands of innocent people turns out to be a big fan?"
I've been studying the photo, and man that guy has sure aged. Must be that clean cave dweller image, and trying to reduce his carbon footprint, has caused him some undue hardships. In any event, I'm not sure if that is a photo of Barrack bin Ladin, or Osama bin Obama, but the rhetoric is the same.
Thats hilarious! And not because its funny, because its the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Keep it up conservatives!
If only he had had his boys ride bicycles into the trade center instead of the global warming jets.
I think we'd all be remiss if we failed to admit that this wasn't the first time the left-wing talking points have dove-tailed perfectly with the views of the guy who'd like to kill every American citizen and destroy this country as we know it. It definitely won't be the last; after all they're reading from essentially the same "Death to America!" rubric.
Yet: we're supposed to hand over the reins to the liberals like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.
I think we'd all be remiss if we failed to admit that this wasn't the first time the left-wing talking points have dove-tailed perfectly with the views of the guy who'd like to kill every American citizen and destroy this country as we know it. It definitely won't be the last
I heard James Cameron gave him a special screening of Avatar.
Obama gave it two-thumbs up…and death to America.
link doesn't work
Why is that the stupidest thing you've ever heard?
“Birds of a feather.” Liberals and Osama working for the same goal of the destruction of America, very nice!
I think Osama's sitting around, telling himself, "Holy Crap of The Prophet, Obama is going to take down America first if I don't get back in the game!" And Osama knows that Obama's strategy of screwing with the economy and spending all the money he can is essentailly what Osama wanted to do with terrorist acts, but much bigger, much faster, and it's the US govt acting against the US! Genius!
If that's the "stupidest thing I've(you've) ever heard" you too must live in a cave.
In fairness, Osama's communication abilities used to be more efficient. He used to blog via carrier pigeon–which, as any Third World troglodyte or Bill Schulz will tell you, is a much faster means of transmission than donkey mailman–but then he suspected the pigeons of being Jews and, well, it wasn't pretty after that.
Because he has a very short-term memory. It doesn't even go back to last night's MSNBC prime-time lineup.
Really, you have to ask?
If Osama came out and said he supports capitalism, would you suddenly reject capitalism because of it? If Osama converted to Chrisitanity, should Christians reject their faith and convert to something else? If Osama says he loves pizza, should we stop eating pizza? If Osama came out of the closet, would conservatives stop being bigots against gay people?
I hope these illustrations help you understand my point of why Greg's comment is so incredibly stupid.
Those are incredibly stupid points – if Osama supported capitalism and/or Christianity, he wouldn't be a threat to the world.
The point Greg is making, and which whizzed over your head like all those stories about the hoaxes behind "climate change", is that Osama sees the "climate change" hysteria for what it is: a tool against the West.
But it is great that Breitbart is making such a problem for you lefties that MediaMatters/HuffPo/et al sent out their shocktroops again. We really missed you!
Considering that the supposed effects of global warming we hear about the most are the flooding of New York and other cities and throwing America and Europe into a new Ice Age, shouldn't Osama be embracing this idea? Besides, you know how caves are; they're cool, dank, and dark all year round, much like the inside of his head.
Does this mean that Al "ManBearPig" Gore and James Hansen are the American Taliban?
MMFA, MSNBC, OBL, goats, lotion: what's not to like?
Shiekh al Gore of the American Taliban – winner of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize – has betrayed this country and played on bin Laden's fears.
.
Osama now wants to be a progressive avatar for the social justice, connected to Obama's brain! This is more awesome proof that being nice to the terrorists is working. Barack was right again.
Mr. Bin Laden doesn't hurt the goats because he also supports PETA and has a low carbon foot print.
Now that Obama and Osama have solved climate justice and terrorism, Nancy Pelosi should ask him to help her with the nuclear option for health care justice. They would really get along.
I think it only makes sense "Don't ask – Don't tell" should probably include goats if they're over a year old.
Ellie Light
Marxville, USA
.
Is it just me, but did UBL blame GWB for not enacting the Kyoto accords?
Wasn't the Kyoto treaty defeated in the Senate in 1999, while Bill Clinton was President?
Or maybe I'm going deaf? Or maybe I'm just jonesing for Megyn Kelly's new show?
This is dumb on so many levels. So what if Osama Bin Laden has an opinion on something. That in itself isnt't evidence of something being false. If Osama goes out and supports the theory of relativity should we stop believing in that to?
.
Hola! Piece of Candy, I recognize you from Robot Theater looking for lotion in the sauna! Yes, I guess this is supposed to be funny to those radical conservatives — if by funny, you mean they really don't like goats.
Ellie Light
Marxville, USA
.
It's ridiculous to presume that Osama gives a rat's backside about the environment. He's just trying to make Al Qaeda sound like Greenpeace with guns, instead of the murderous lunatics everyone knows they are. It's a PR stunt, that's all.
I don't expect you guys to denounce your eco-religion simply because Osama Bin Laden pretends to support it. Frankly, I'd be happy if you guys just denounced Osama Bin Laden.
What I find funny, however, is that Obama seems to think he can find common ground with the American Left. Obama would never reject capitalism and convert to Christianity because the stretch would be too much to convince anyone of his sincerity. But the anti-American, anti-Western Civilization, anti-Christian rhetoric he's been spewing for over a decade fits right in with the garbage you and yours peddle. All he has to do it take the "Peace Be Upon Him" crap out of his speeches, add a few lines of global warming nonsense, blame a thing or two on Bush, and he could give Michael Moore a run for his money.
Gunnar, Osama would never support the theory of relativity because it was invented by a jew. Now go home and get your shine box.
Does sex with goats cause carbon emmisions? Or does it stop methane from being released?
It's sad that Osama thinks sex with goats is "green". I'm sure Osama likes having sex with goats but do goats like having sex with him?
Hey Greg you know what the best part of mocking Osama and saying he likes to have sex with goats is? Absolutely no one will step up to dispute it or say you are wrong for saying it. It's like kicking Hitler in the balls. It's just fun.
wow a bad joke and an insult. Guess that's all you can expect on this site.
That is it then I guess. Now that Osama, the last hold-out famed climatologist, has signed on, the scientific consensus has been acheived.
bin Laden has always parroted the left's talking points. I guess he subscribes to the NYT and watches CNN International.
Their goals are kind of the same; control over what everybody thinks, does or eats. Strict adherence to the tenets of their particular religion. So it's not too surprising.
[...] here to read the rest: Daily Gut: Osama’s Green Plan! This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
Boooo, bring back CgntvDssdent! At least he was a good contrarian and troll.
Excellent point, Gipper… bin Laden's tapes from a few years back (e.g., just before the 2004 election) were nearly indistinguishable from the DNC's talking points.
How many goats does Algore have on his farm?
Counting Tipper?
More proof that logic is lost on liberals. If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck and looks like a duck it is probably a duck. If someone shares the same philosophy as the majority of the dictators in the world and those dictators praise that person, he and others that know him should question his philosophy. Liberals adore adulation, no matter the source.
Al Gore and bin dover Laden do share the same extremists views. They both hate America. Gore is a prostitute for attention, money and power. He's like a carnival barker [shill, tout, pimp] , seducing rubes into his house of horrors. A fear monger playing on the emotions of saps and the weak minded. Like P.T. Barnum said, 'There's a Sucker Born Everyday'.
The Left longs for a way to assign some legitimacy to bin Laden. Global Warming might be the ticket that gets his foot in the door.
There is reason to think Osama has been dead since Tora Bora – "his" tapes have been analysed by a Swiss company & pronounced fake & as with this one, "his" rantings have increasingly been unrelated to his real orighinal objective – overthrowing the government of Saudi. Being a fake does make him uniquely attuned to the catastrophic warming "consensus" which is also a fake. I have asked thousands of people to name even 2 scientists who support this alleged consensus & who aren't government funded & not one has been able to do so.
Actually Gunnar, its you who are dumb on so many levels.
Like most brainless liberals(that would be a good name for a rock band), you fail to think beyond the surface.
Bin Ladin knows this is a hot button issue and he knows what the ramifications to capitalism it will be if implemented.
The fact that an American hater is endorsing the same things as the left should make good people pause, but alas, it just proves the left are not just wrong, but evil.
Aren't goats considered full-grown at 1 year? Ellie, you better check with our Safe Schools Czar before you set an age limit like that.
If the American Left did not learn their lesson after their ill-fated love affair with Stalin and Mao then you can only make one conclusion: they truly believe in their ideology and want to see America destroyed.
With the current administration in place we need to re-think our reasons for going after Osama bin Laden. Instead of focusing on the lives that were lost when the World Trade Centre was destroyed, we instead need to call attention to the size of the carbon footprint that the event created. That puts it into a context that the hard core leftists and Sandinistas in this administration can understand and relate to. They'll probably want him strung up instead of tried in court.
Jonah Goldberg's thoughts on Osama and Global Warming:
"I love this story about Bin Laden denouncing global warming. Will he come out in favor of beheading carbon emitters? Can I get 72 virgins if I promise to weatherstrip my house? How about if I install solar panels?
Also is Bin Laden now refusing "blood money" from the climate criminals in Saudi Arabia who fund his operation?
Of course, any minute now we're going to hear from someone — any predictions who? — that the real reason "they" hate "us" is climate change. It ain't freedom, it ain't American empire, or licentiousness, or Israel. All of these jihadi nutters are blowing themselves up to save the polar bear."
Considering that you are talking about people whose views are explicitly aligned with Stalin and Mao, that ship has sailed.
Ellie…………….Who knew?
Here I had you pegged for being one of those child raping racist litter-bugs that Greg was talking about.
Be careful climbing into bed with Osama, Oblama, & Algore, you may roll-over on a goat.
No, not Nancy……………………………………………………
Osama is looking suspiciously in league with the fight from the left. In this speech he quotes Chomsky and basically tows the progressive party line just as he did in an earlier speech (different subject – capitalism is evil etc.) in which he again quotes Chomsky. Here is the transcript: http://counterterrorismblog.org/site-resources/im... which also provides the link to the actual vid clip.
The Left and Al Qaida need to just stop flirting and do the deed already. Although I would prefer they use condoms or avail themselves of the morning after pill. With them, their immediate pleasure always ends up in regret.
And if an elephant stepped on your head, it would be flat, but you'd still be dead, and not because your sinuses were clogged and you couldn't breathe. What an idiotic, illogical you've made. As if Osama would ever do anything just to get us to change our ways – it's not in his nature. He'll use whatever he can as a weapon against us.
But he would use clueless lefties as the useful idiots they are to further his own aims. And of course, when he was done with them, he'd dispose of them like the garbage he considers them to be.
Hey Greg!
Are you suggesting Osama should apply for Van Jones old job as "green czar"? He knows nothing about climate change – he keeps hidden in the background – people in the USA hate the guy – and he fits all of obamas radical requirements! He'd be a shoe in!
And he's got that spicy new avatar! Matt Damon you are on the shelf!
Yes, but that rock band would still suck.
Well, it could be because Osama's feeling ronery and has embraced global warming in hopes that he'll get adulation from the progressive set.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&...
I explained why the argument makes no sense with an example to make it easy for anyone to understand. And you just repeat the argument that I just refuted. Do you even read what you are replying to? And I am not a liberal. Just a person who understands simple logic.
really simple!
It would be nice if Steisand would go visit him for awhile. He could use another wife.
OBL is just green with Nobel envy, and given recent history, is probably now the front runner for next years Piece of Prize.
"we're supposed to hand over the reins to the liberals like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi."
Unfortunately we already did.
I see your point, but that point is based on hypotheticals. *IF* Osama did start expounding on relativity, puppy dogs, organic food, *THEN* the relevance of his AGW position would be questionable. That much I can agree with, *BUT*, so far, he seems only to promote ideas harmful to America and to Western Civilization in general..
BTW, that reminds me. When I was in school in the '60s "Western Civilization" was a required course. Do they even teach that any more? Be nice if they do. Or do they teach it as a bunch of thugs beating up on poor indigenous peoples as if that's all there was to it and as if they weren't already beating up on each other.
*horrified look*
Isn't that a bit harsh? I mean, Osama's a murdering bastard but still… O_O;;
Sleepers of the Matrix unite!
BUCK FIN LADEN.
Personally, I hope US Marines fart pure methane at this rat b@stard's funeral while they piss pure alcohol residue on his face, and throw empty beer cans and plastic wrappers for barbeque pig skins all over the place around his grave site.
And I hope they wrap his @ss in a pig-blood-covered American flag and drape a bible open over his face.
It IS a war, after all.
We'll pin a note to her saying, "There's more harpies where THIS one came from. Surrender or ELSE."
Who's to say he's not on Media Matters' advisory board?
whenever people talk about going green, i said that bin laden's cf (carbon footprint) was envious…living in a cave, eating bugs and recyling his urine.
this is all about money and power.
what luck for rulers that men do not think….hitler
I find it amazing that someone who DOESN'T GET the point of Gutfield's article has the nerve to call it stupid.
"Global warming" is a hoax. The data was rigged to produce a DESIRED OUTCOME. In REAL SCIENTIFIC CIRCLES, we call this GIGO, or "garbage in, garbage out". It is a kind of fraud.
When economic policy is going to be built around fraudulent data, people should pay atention and protest it. Osama wants us to waste money on global warming BS becauser it's a distraction and it is bad for our economy.
Do you understand?
Gunnar, you seem to lack the intelligence to ask the obvious question: Why?
Why would Osama support the climate change hoax? Because he knows the damage that it would do to the U.S.A.
Why would Osama make a statement supporting the Theory of Relativity? Right, he wouldn't. It has absolutely nothing to do with his goals.
Your counterpoint is laughable, because it is not based in reality. Now, there is always the chance that you realize this but use it anyway. That indicates that you are either extremely obtuse or extremely dishonest.
The "or" there is not exclusive, of course.
Is it possible that you have negative feelings for Osama?
I hasten to point out that Osama has , in fact, NOT come out is support of any of those things, and is exceeedingly unlikely to….Typical liberal debate tactic: throw out unlikely or impossible hypotheticals from your fevered little minds, and expect that they should carry the same weight as actual facts!
No you seem to lack the intelligence to understand that science isn't political. It doesn't matter if Hitler resurrects and becomes the #1 supporter of anti-carbon laws. That still has nothing to do with the science behind climate change and it wouldn't make me rethink my position on the issue. Actual facts and observations is the only thing that would change that. The politics on how to solve it is something else of course and obviously Bin Laden wouldn't agree with most western or rational people on that, but the idea that one person having an opinion on something without providing any new facts or evidence, by itself, is going to change my view on a scientific issue is absurd.
What fries me is that the Left insists on pretending this guy is alive. Osama inconveniently got himself killed, but the Left needed him as the Big Snipe Hunt to blather righeteously that "Why is Bush sending troops to Iraq when we should be using all our resources to hunt down Bin Laden and bring him to justice." The jihadis quickly obliged and began leaking "sightings" of Bin Laden from Swat to downtown Memphis cadillac dealerships, buying surprised everydayman a free sedan. Actually, that was a surprised Pakistani who got … not kidding ,a free camel.
FORTUNATELY, Bush isn't STUPID and kept our troops focused on an actual war.
SInce Bin Laden is in no position any more to defend his "brand" the Left now uses him as their tribal moral authority for their agenda. Classically, Osama BIn Laden, or the little guy, was just like Nancy Pelosi – a multimillionaire who thought he should be royalty.
People came running to find out why I had said, "Ha" so loudly…
Gunnar, you seem to lack the intelligence to ask the obvious question: Why?
Why would Osama support the climate change hoax? Because he knows the damage that it would do to the U.S.A.
Why would Osama make a statement supporting the Theory of Relativity? Right, he wouldn't. It has absolutely nothing to do with his goals.
Your counterpoint is laughable, because it is not based in reality. Now, there is always the chance that you realize this but use it anyway. That indicates that you are either extremely obtuse or extremely dishonest.
The "or" there is not exclusive, of course.
You are a fool. If you haven't noticed, climate change is highly politicized. The IPCC head admitted that the faulty glacier data was included in their report to INFLUENCE governments. If that isn't political, what is?
Idiot.
I thought Pol Potsie was a funny comeback myself.
Brilliant.
Shocktroops? Thats funny too. You need to dial down your sense of self importance. Oops, but then you wouldn't be a proper conservative.
Those aren't points I made, they are analogies. What ISN'T a tool against the West in Osama's eyes? Further, its just as idiotic to say Osama wouldn't be a threat if he supported capitalism and Christianity. But, thats why you're here. Stupid needs stupid.
What do you think is the point of terrorism? It is exactly to get us to change our ways, to be scared and do more to hurt ourselves as a result of their actions. Obviously you've already been defeated by them. Eh. You're not worth the time.
Thats a pretty small "real scientific circles" you pay attention to. The overwhelming scientific evidence and consensus shows climate change to be real. If thats not good enough, try paying attention to the local climate over the last 10 years or so, or watch the polar ice melt, etc. etc.
The point of the aricle is that we should believe global warming is a hoax because Osama believes it is real. Thats pretty stupid. Feel free to delighten me if you read something else from it.
I didn't know Gore is a Christian. I don't like him anymore.
"The overwhelming scientific evidence and consensus shows climate change to be real."
Of course "climate change" is real. You expect the climate to stay static?
And don't try to talk to me about anything having to do with science. You're not qualified.
Awesome. That means you don't like me either and I can stop holding back on you.
I'll let you off the hook because you technically didn't lie given the words you chose. You said global warming is a hoax, but now you say climate change is real. The two terms are interchangeable in "normal" discussion, while not necessarily the same thing. However, the Earth is warming, is it not? If you're Mr scientist I hope you can give an answer without political bias.
No, I don't expect the climate to stay static (forever). I also don't expect it to change so extremely in such a short amount of time.
Who said the right doesn't have elitists? – "And don't try to talk to me about anything having to do with science. You're not qualified."
"Global warming" is a hoax.
Climate change IS a provable phenomena.
You know nothing about real science, how science gets "done", the process of peer review, writing grant proposals, or V&V. You watch idiots who feed you what they call "news" and you eat it up with a spoon, never asking a single question because you don't see any need to.
Stop depending on me. I'm tired of conservatives' neediness.
I like it, you're conflicted. How old is the Earth?
That's not the point you were trying to make earlier – you were saying that Obsama would somehow mysteriously metamorphose into something that would scare us to change our ways. He's not going to change anything – I think that it's perfectly plain that he is what he is – a militant Islamofascist and he's not going to become a Rotarian or something so that nobody would want to become a Rotarian because – he's one, OMG! If you're going to be scared enough to change your ways just for the likes of him, feel free – I'm going to live my life as I see fit and I'm not going to let him or his kind change me. Back to the minors for you, rookie.
Good for you, I'm glad you're not scared of terrorists. That makes one conservative. Can I get two.
You're flat wrong about the point I was making. Go back and read it if you need to. My point was that Greg's article is idiotic because it expresses we should reject global warming because Osama has stated it is real and we should address it. Because IT IS stupid to ignore many relevant factors that inform our knowledge, just because we hate a scum dog terrorist who says something. Don't Tread asked why I think its so stupid and I answered with a list of even more ridiculous examples that (hopefully) show more clearly why the premise of Greg's article is so stupid.
Agreed, ridiculous hypotheticals, highly unlikely. But it would be equally stupid for anyone to change their position on any of those subjects because Osama supports or believes any of them. That is what the article is about, that we should stop accepting climate change is real because Osama now believes it is real. You don't need facts for idiotic concepts as this. Just be a conservative and you don't have to think at all.
So science is a popularity contest to you?
Great. Let's alter the laws of physics by "consensus" and get a bunch of scientists to decide that practical anti-gravity and FTL travel are possible! You can get on the first vehicle using these principles, of course.
Your problem is, as was pointed out elsewhere, the GIGO effect. For example: you bleat about polar ice melt, but never bother to check and see if the polar ice comes back because that just might threaten your precious consensus.
The point of the article flew over your head. You already ignored someone else pointing out what that point was.
It would sure be nice if you offered something of substance. All you did here was rehash what you already said and make an ignorant accusation. Some scientist you are (assuming you actually know anything about science). I'm starting to think I prbably know more about science than you do, given your desperate grasping to express your scientific dominance.
So, is it not unusual that we're experiencing such extreme climate change in such a short amount of time?
Is the planet not warming right now?
No, science has nothing to do with popularity to me. If an overwhelming consensus of scientists believe something to be true, I'm inclined to believe their collective expert opinions. Are two heads not better than one? Give me a break with this childish crap your spewing. I know you are but what am I…
"you bleat about polar ice melt, but never bother to check and see if the polar ice comes back " – What? Seriously, are you ten? Yes, polar ice comes back with the seasonal changes, but it is coming back less and less. It won't be long before it will be open water year-around along the northern stretch of Canada and Russia, or at least thats the direction its heading. Hey, the consensus could be wrong, but we don't have anything better so far to indicate that.
The GIGO effect is really a succinct description of conservative intelligence. Input Hannity/Limbaugh/Fox News/Malkin/Coulter//etc. ad nauseum, output garbage. BTW, GIGO is based on computer models and I put very, very little stock in computer models. Which is why you attack it, because it isn't real.
no
So you don't depend on consensus, yet mention it over and over.
The GIGO effect is a succinct description of the anthropocentric global warming theories. They start from a conclusion "industrial civilization caused it" and then go find evidence to "prove" it… even falsifying data and running with it, knowing the meme will be spread long before careful study can reveal the lies and distortions.
Except it's getting noticed, which is probably why you're so cranky when your views are mocked. Cheer up, the Sun is getting a bit more active, which hopefully means no mini Ice Age and warmer weather. That means you can point and wail and use the term "global warming" instead of the more flexible "climate change" term that lets you blame industrial civilization for any fluctuation in climate instead of just higher temperatures.
Does the position of a consensus of experts (in a very complex scientific field) not have any value to you? Your focus on a word, "consensus", is an easy way for you to avoid the reality. Same as the rest of your comment, its not rational, its political garbage.
Climate change is real, and a more accurate description of what is happening. Once you accept that fact we can move on to figure out how much, if any, affect humans are having on its cause and/or speed of its occurence. From there we can figure if there is anything we can do about it anyway. The fact you can't get past step one, the most factual and supported step of the three steps, proves it is only a political issue to your feeble mind.
Agreed on GIGO. Climate models are useless and make things worse in trying to get to the truth in this issue.
You must be logged in to post a comment.