Daily Gut: Dan’s the Man
by Greg GutfeldSo the White House has a new communications director, and he’s just as adorably misguided as the previous one. During an interview with The New York Times’ The Caucus blog – whatever that is – Dan Pfeiffer (no relation to Michelle, darn it, she has my sweater), explained his revolutionary point of view toward FNC.
“I have the same view of Fox that Anita [Dunn] had, which is that Fox is not a traditional news organization. They have a point of view. That point of view pervades the entire network both the opinion shows… but also through the newscasts during the day,” Pfeiffer said.

The man who refuses to learn from history, continued on with his cogent analysis…
“We don’t feel an obligation to treat them like we would treat a CNN or an ABC or an NBC or a traditional news organization. But there are times when it would make sense to communicate with them and appear on the network.”
Well, thanks for that. Glad to know “there are times” when the White House might drop Fox News a line about upcoming Easter egg hunts and what not.
Anyway, let’s examine this hypocrisy for what it is. Oh yeah, hypocrisy
Fact is, if Dan feels this way about Fox News, he should feel the same about MSNBC, a sweaty outfit covered in a burqa of bias. Also, you might include: NPR, PBS, NBC, ABC CNN, Hollywood, the arts, the guy who works at Starbucks, my Pilates instructor (he smells like votive candles) and anyone from 60 Minutes. Oh, and why not those kids at Newsweek or Time, who turned their rags into Tigerbeat “Obama Collector editions.” The only things missing were dream journal stickers.
Look, Obama has gotten better media coverage than God (or Bono), but the White House is pissed they can’t have everything. They’re like the angry kid on the playground who wants to take his ball and go home if he can’t pitch, bat clean up and keep score. And that’s partly why FNC regularly beats CNN, MSNBC and HLN combined in total viewers every weeknight during prime time. Fox News may be the Goliath, but the White House keeps making it look like David. Which is kinda awesome, but not for them.
And if you disagree with me, you’re probably a racist homophobe who wears fur.
Tonight, Andrea Tantaros (yum!), Alan Colmes (yippee), Joe Devito (yeehaw!), and more stuff!






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
61 Comments
Among the many things we must separate from the State . . .
Separation of Media and State.
Separation of Hollywood and State.
I take it these people have never watched a newscast with Shepherd "oh the humanity" Smith.
But I'm taking heart in the fact that this administration proves time and time again that they are incapable of learning from their mistakes.
Wait a minute . . . .
"I have the same view of Fox that Anita [Dunn] had, which is that Fox is not a traditional news organization."
Well since Anita Dunn is a Marxist . . . her idea of a "traditional" news organization is run by the State for the benefit of the State. So . . .
and what were you expecting? William Randolph Hearst?…
they will continue to whine about their press coverage, no doubt. And everything else as well. Heck, they're liberals, that;s what they do.
This nerd will fit right in…
"LUMPY RUTHERFORD" You've arrived!
I wonder how Dan feels about Chairman Mao? And I mean by that is he a big jerk face?
Dunn, Dunn, she's our man.
If she cant do it no one.. oh wait..
Dan, Dan, he's our man.
If he cant do it no one.. DAM!
What is this kid, like, 12? He looks like he should be working as a telemarketer in Massapequa. It's likely that it's the only thing for which he's truly qualified.
nowhere near as cool as Frank Bank aka 'Lumpy Rutherford'…
You mean, all the stuff going on in Haiti is just an opinion ? Someone's "point of view"? What a relief…after watching Fox, I thought something terrible had happened. But, you know, if they don't do REAL news, then everything is copacetic.
Would only we could separate thieves from the state….
…. we have one run by the moon bats for the benefit of the state.
Standard political ops 101. Find a horse and beat it to death, then continue beating till something changes the topic.
Kicking Fox is always a favorite on the left. I have friends who will insist something did not happen if its broadcast on Fox. Even if its also on CNN. Literately they'll say it never happened, I assume because Fox is supposed to be in capable of telling the truth.
In a way, I do feel sorry for them. Imagine having to go through life ignoring reality in order to keep your head on straight?
(Channeling the Great Karnak)
"The Obama administration reiterated their intention to not treat FNC as a 'traditional news organization.' It was determined the message was not received by the two viewers still watching the MSM, as they had fallen asleep dreaming about sex with unicorns."
Or Olbermann's lips from Obama's A$$!
No, but the resemblance & charcter is uncanny.
I am a racist homophobe, Gregg, but I still agree with you. Ever since that black poofter tried to rub my leg…and where's that darn fur coat?
The criminal enterprise known as the Democratic Party has a simple tactic: ignore the truth till it bites
you on the ass really hard. Pfieffer will continue the tradition of sophistry and deceit.
Even with the President pulling out his secret weapon – a Wookiee named Chewbacca who promised she will fight childhood obesity – it is 3 more years of lies, lies and damned lies from these slugs.
Wow partisan hackery at it's best. Neither FNC or MSNBC are real news channels. In fact I would say none of it is really news. The way most of it works is a journalist forms an opinion, (or their boss forms it for them) then they go out and find quotes and facts to support the conclusion they themselves have already come to. If you guys think MSNBC is partisan but FNC isn't then you cannot ever tell anybody else to "wake up" or whatever else Beckbots say to people when they've ran out of arguments.
So the White House has a new communications director who is as looney as Anita. Big surprise. He seems to be a practiced whiner weiner, just like his boss. Liberals, are the biggest adolesent crybabies when someone dares to print or speak the truth of their lies. But you know, he's right about Fox not being today's traditional news network. And thank the Lord! Especially considering the charlatan Obama shill networks this idiot considers "Traditional" today.
So FOX is singled out for special treatment. Wear it as a badge of honor.
To some extent I would agree with you. Every one's own personal opinions are based upon their own personal experiences. And it is part of human nature to search out those who agree with you, arguably nicer instinct than to search out people who piss you off to no end.
I believe the point is not that some media outlets are biased while others are not, but rather for as long as I've been alive, CBS, NBC, ABC, later PBS, claimed to be of the highest degree of journalism. At least publicly, they claimed the moral high ground, were beyond reproach, and yet strangely, never really challenged on it.
All the other little cable outlets like CNBC, MSBC, CNN, et. al. have laid claim to that strangely never challenged claim.
The internet, talk radio, the alternate news media outlets have been broadcasting what the stalwarts of the gold standard of news have decided is not worthy of being disseminated to the unwashed masses. And its proved at least to me beyond a shadow of a doubt, they have a huge bias.
And that's the maddening part. It's obvious they are so biased they sleep in Obama underoos.
Let me ask you – do you believe in man-caused global warming? If so, did you hear about Climategate from the MSM? My guess is perhaps a mention, and that's about it. I watched, and listened, and all I heard was a quick analysis of why the story was so unimportant.
If you do believe that humans are on the verge of destroying the world, are you as mad as hell at those scientists who obviously rigged their studies? How about the 'unbiased" MSM who basically told us not to worry our pretty little heads about it.
Where is the outrage on the left over this kind of stuff?
This effort to continue to TRY to undermine Fox News is emblematic of this whole corrupt administration – Fox is the last network doing the work of a news network – and this control freak in the White House can't stand that.
I would hope the next conservative President, or even just the next Republican would have the same attitude toward hostile news outlets, but if that happened, we'd never hear from the poor chap or lady. For a conservative to shut out the media like Obama does, people would start to question if they were dead.
I remember laughing heartily when Obama announced his plans with FOX, especially since the same side of the political aisle complained and bemoaned for hours on end about how Bush favored FOX. Obama favors the biased media at the complete expense of the fair media. It's a sad dichotomy and even sadder that no one has called him out on it.
Bwahhaaaaa!!! Now that was funny!
Don't you mean separate the tingle from Matthews' leg?
Darkwolf, I think you had it right on the first verse.
Egomaniacs and narcisists can't stand any negative comments or press, especially if it's true.
yes it is…
yes it is…
KoolAid comes in many flavors, Ed…
Objectivity has certainly gone out the window in any kind of journalism today, so let's embrace that fact. I won't mind of the state run media finally comes out of the closet and admits they're stooges for Comrade Obama's administration.
I heard Brit Hume actually say Fox News leaned right, but tried to keep it "fair and balanced."
Let all the media come clean on how they lean.
I was watching Fox last night and on Geraldo (he was not there but Coulter was informed everyone he was behind stating the comment) highlighted Rush stating that the Obama administration was excited about the political benefits of helping Haiti. The comment was discussed in a capacity hegative to Rush and Coulter complained more about Geraldo not using one of her quotes rather than defend Rush. This is a News Show.
On Hannity Juan Williams was on the panel and practically spoonfeeding the "It's Wall Street" line of the administration and I have yet to hear someone tell Bob Beckel to shut up. Fox is Conservative in its Outlook but the liberals on the show are allowed their viewpoints. I cannot remember a conservative ever being allowed to make statements on the MSM networks without being interrupted and insulted in some way. So as to ADY comment I think he has never watched Fox News.
Aaah Darkwolf – thank you for a good laugh at the end of the day! Very clever! I just love this administration: qualifications, we don't need no stinking qualifications. Dan Dan you are the COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR! Off to a great start.
Take a closer look…….that picture looks familiar….isn't that Anita Dunn WITHOUT makeup?
You might try actually WATCHING Fox…you can do it…push the little button.
There are LOADS of liberals on Fox – NIGHTLY. They spew, we rage, but we get an informed, rounded view.
David Gergan doesn't count as a "conservative" when he goes on MSNBC or CNN.
Related to the meme of Greg's argument here I was checking the News Sites on the web tday for any indication on how the Massachusetts Senate race was going. FOX had the article on the front Web Page and there were four different ones regarding the race featured throughout the day.
MSNBC and CNN did not have any artcle on the front web page and not even a link to one at the bottom. You could find one in the Politics section but it focused more on the effects on the healthcare bill if MA THA lost. The MSN messenger search page had an article on this highlighted. Just goes to prove Greg's point.
By the way Greg if you are not a homophobic racist are you still allowed to wear fur.
Anita Dunn considers Tass to be the epitome of traditional news organizations.
MATT DAMON
oh snap!
"Fox is not a traditional news organization."
Confirmation that Fox viewers are the new rebels.
Does Obama have a panel that picks the most Dufus looking white guys as there press people? I mean this guy and Gibbs? I just want to bitch slap them for there idiotic looks.
[...] the original: Daily Gut: Dan’s the Man This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
This guy is an idiot.
What about the separation of the media from Obamas leg?
Thanks ! I cannot watch him. How did he get that job. Hmmmm, I think I know how…I just don't know who.
All he has to do is call Glenn;s red phone and get it all straightened out. Duh!
This embryo looks like trouble.
The only thing I can think of that is non traditional about FOX News, as opposed to the LSM, is that they aren't openly hostile to conservatives and/or the Republican party. There is a difference in how FOX covers straight news, and their opinion shows, which don't hide their agenda.
Obama's greatest weakness is his inability to surround himself with those who can offset his many weaknesses.
They keep swinging and missing don't they?
Well, in these situations, FOX is at an unfair advantage.
If you just let a modern liberal speak their mind, in front of rational, reasonable people, it becomes very obvious, very soon, who the idiot is. So of course Fox is happy to have them ramble on.
On modern liberal networks they know how dangerous it is to let their audience hear rational debate. Some one watching might just stop and sat to themselves 'Hey you know what? That kind of makes sense to me.'
So they have to shut down conservatives ASAP.
Why should FOX care if they are treated as a "traditional" news outlet? I say they should go with the "not your average news source" and run with it. They don't need inside status. They just need to do the news.
where is the pod factory? everyone at the WH speaks with the same tongue
Wow the hypocrisy from these loons makes me physically sick. I haven't encountered head banging, temper tantrum throwing little idiots like this since I was in kindergarten. I guess they are thinking the longer they perpetuate the lie…say it over and over again…then it will become a fact. I just can't understand why they continue to fight Fox. It's a losing battle.
Another point of contention that makes me ill is the fact that he considers MSNBC a news organization? Really, why not Fox? They have Beck, OReilly and Hannity who are opinionated journalists who slant a little right. MSNBC has that dude Maddow, that quack Olbermann, that drone Matthews and realistically the rest of their staff as well. What makes them different than Fox? Oh yeah…they kiss the ass of their appointed messiah and his Obamabots.
That's not all they do with it.
I can see this man is destined to do a bang-up job for the Obama administration. He should be interviewed regularly.
When you already know everything, you make no mistakes…therefore, there is no need to learn anything.
The Obama White HOUSE and the demoncrats on the Hill have to ATTACK Beck and Hannity more than O'Reilly.
With the rest of the MSM being in the bag for the last three years for Obama.
Beck and his Teabaggers, PROJECT 21 and his funny way of telling his truth has done more to destroy Obama than anyone else in the Media.
Fox News has to NOW be the BIG ENEMY of the OBAMA Administration. There will never be anything but good ole fashioned CHICAGO POLITICS out of Obama.
And may the BEST FOX WIN..
The defeat in Mass. is just the beginning of the end for the classless despot in the White House.
Danny is simply playing the cards that his boss tells him too….there is nothing wrong with that.
Face it….Fox News is to the White House what Superman is to Lex Luthor. When the White House fails to implement their radical, leftist, progressive plans for the country they have to blame somebody and that somebody will always be Fox News. "Ahhh, if it weren't for Fox News…the world would be ours. We'll get you next time Fox News".
This whole "Fox News isn't a real news network" thing is a simple ploy to make voters forget that the Democrats have the power in both the House and the Senate to pass whatever they want. The Republicans couldn't stop them if they wanted to. It is precisely that reason that the White House is targeting Fox….they aren't going to admit that their planned policies will directly lead to a Democratic *ss whooping being handed down.
But surely, Danny boy, you can at least use different words then your Mao-loving friend.
spwagner
http://sanityintheasylum.blogspot.com/
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.