<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Director&#8217;s Most Patriotic Role</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:17:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-36785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-36785</guid>
		<description>I think Greg does a great Mohammed impersonation, he had me fooled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Greg does a great Mohammed impersonation, he had me fooled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-36249</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-36249</guid>
		<description>K2, pretty good ideas. Are you a writer? I want to know if there is anyone else pursuing Greg&#039;s concept.

I have a 26-year-old director who does the shoot in his parent&#039;s garage while they are away. Other than that, his equipment, crew, and special-effects technology are state of the art (film school kids between gigs). The actor playing Mohammed is unknown but very good, and he is a native Arabic speaker. Most importantly, the director hires an Islamic scholar who writes Mohammed&#039;s words and coaches the actor in portraying an authentic 10th century dialect, including obscure idioms. The professor INSISTS that his name be left off the credits - he is working for $50,000 in cash, and he rightfully fears for his life if this &quot;short film&quot; becomes widely known. 

I like your other ideas. I&#039;d rather not discuss other details in this public venue - if you&#039;d like to go back and forth further in private, drop me a note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K2, pretty good ideas. Are you a writer? I want to know if there is anyone else pursuing Greg&#8217;s concept.</p>
<p>I have a 26-year-old director who does the shoot in his parent&#8217;s garage while they are away. Other than that, his equipment, crew, and special-effects technology are state of the art (film school kids between gigs). The actor playing Mohammed is unknown but very good, and he is a native Arabic speaker. Most importantly, the director hires an Islamic scholar who writes Mohammed&#8217;s words and coaches the actor in portraying an authentic 10th century dialect, including obscure idioms. The professor INSISTS that his name be left off the credits &#8211; he is working for $50,000 in cash, and he rightfully fears for his life if this &#8220;short film&#8221; becomes widely known. </p>
<p>I like your other ideas. I&#8217;d rather not discuss other details in this public venue &#8211; if you&#8217;d like to go back and forth further in private, drop me a note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K 2</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-36201</link>
		<dc:creator>K 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-36201</guid>
		<description>And Glenn, you&#039;ll need a title.  How about &quot;Wag the God&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Glenn, you&#8217;ll need a title.  How about &#8220;Wag the God&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K 2</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-36189</link>
		<dc:creator>K 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-36189</guid>
		<description>Glenn, what if the director decides he can&#039;t use a known actor to play Mohammed (for obvious reasons)and finds a simple Arabic speaking non-actor to play the part...or maybe he steals someone from an institution who really thinks he IS Mohammed?  Could that be your straight character?  If the &quot;actor&quot; really believes he&#039;s the Prophet, it could be a great twist.  The idea of his being pulled by all sides to validate their various agendas has both comedic and &quot;dark&quot; possibilities.  Meanwhile, the simple (or delusional) guy gradually, due to all the attention he&#039;s getting, becomes more and more full of himself and actually starts gaining real power among the &quot;street&quot;, eventually manipulating the very people who were trying to use him, and destroying them in the process.  And in the end, faithful to the Strangelove analogy, &quot;Mohammed&quot; decides the fate of the world.  My guess is that the ending would be very similar to Strangelove.  KA-BLOOOEY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, what if the director decides he can&#8217;t use a known actor to play Mohammed (for obvious reasons)and finds a simple Arabic speaking non-actor to play the part&#8230;or maybe he steals someone from an institution who really thinks he IS Mohammed?  Could that be your straight character?  If the &#8220;actor&#8221; really believes he&#8217;s the Prophet, it could be a great twist.  The idea of his being pulled by all sides to validate their various agendas has both comedic and &#8220;dark&#8221; possibilities.  Meanwhile, the simple (or delusional) guy gradually, due to all the attention he&#8217;s getting, becomes more and more full of himself and actually starts gaining real power among the &#8220;street&#8221;, eventually manipulating the very people who were trying to use him, and destroying them in the process.  And in the end, faithful to the Strangelove analogy, &#8220;Mohammed&#8221; decides the fate of the world.  My guess is that the ending would be very similar to Strangelove.  KA-BLOOOEY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MCP</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-36117</link>
		<dc:creator>The MCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-36117</guid>
		<description>&quot;If we are going to change the Hollywood culture, we MUST go beyond blogging - we must produce solid commercial material.&quot;

You, too, are exactly correct. :)  This is a point I&#039;ve tried to make several times on other blogs and forums I hang out at -- satisfying as it may be to vent our spleens in our blogs, and on talk radio, ultimately we conservatives *have* to do more than just commiserate with each other in our echo chambers.  If you want to win a war -- hot war, cold war, war of ideas, culture war, whatever -- you can&#039;t do it just by sitting around the chow hall kibbitzing with each other; sooner or later you *have* to go out and engage the opposition.

And let me say, to those of you who&#039;ve had the stones to come out of the Hollywood closet on this site and be counted -- good on ya. :)  I, for one, shall be keeping a little list of names, and using it to help decide where my entertainment dollars go in future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we are going to change the Hollywood culture, we MUST go beyond blogging &#8211; we must produce solid commercial material.&#8221;</p>
<p>You, too, are exactly correct. <img src='http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   This is a point I&#8217;ve tried to make several times on other blogs and forums I hang out at &#8212; satisfying as it may be to vent our spleens in our blogs, and on talk radio, ultimately we conservatives *have* to do more than just commiserate with each other in our echo chambers.  If you want to win a war &#8212; hot war, cold war, war of ideas, culture war, whatever &#8212; you can&#8217;t do it just by sitting around the chow hall kibbitzing with each other; sooner or later you *have* to go out and engage the opposition.</p>
<p>And let me say, to those of you who&#8217;ve had the stones to come out of the Hollywood closet on this site and be counted &#8212; good on ya. <img src='http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I, for one, shall be keeping a little list of names, and using it to help decide where my entertainment dollars go in future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan DeLaurier</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-35525</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan DeLaurier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-35525</guid>
		<description>Gutfeld at his best!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutfeld at his best!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-35417</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-35417</guid>
		<description>Thanks MCP. You are exactly correct - no happy ending here. No slapstick, no Mel Brooks sort of stuff, and no Matthew McConaughey as Jesus either.

But there would be justice and satisfaction. The director and his journalist girlfriend get what they deserve. I have not yet created a &quot;straight&quot; character - possibly that will be someone with the CIA.  

I have two other noir comedy ideas, one (in the treatment stage) that deals with race relations one that deals with eco-terrorism. If we are going to change the Hollywood culture, we MUST go beyond blogging - we must produce solid commercial material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks MCP. You are exactly correct &#8211; no happy ending here. No slapstick, no Mel Brooks sort of stuff, and no Matthew McConaughey as Jesus either.</p>
<p>But there would be justice and satisfaction. The director and his journalist girlfriend get what they deserve. I have not yet created a &#8220;straight&#8221; character &#8211; possibly that will be someone with the CIA.  </p>
<p>I have two other noir comedy ideas, one (in the treatment stage) that deals with race relations one that deals with eco-terrorism. If we are going to change the Hollywood culture, we MUST go beyond blogging &#8211; we must produce solid commercial material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MCP</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-35377</link>
		<dc:creator>The MCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-35377</guid>
		<description>Glenn -- all I can say is that if you&#039;re going to do it as a dark comedy, please *keep* it dark and go for the jugular; *don&#039;t* wimp out with a &quot;happy&quot; ending like some other recent dark-in-name-only comedies (yes, I&#039;m looking at *you*, &quot;Death to Smoochy!&quot;) have done.

If you can actually get this to the screen, I&#039;ll be there on opening night in the front row. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn &#8212; all I can say is that if you&#8217;re going to do it as a dark comedy, please *keep* it dark and go for the jugular; *don&#8217;t* wimp out with a &#8220;happy&#8221; ending like some other recent dark-in-name-only comedies (yes, I&#8217;m looking at *you*, &#8220;Death to Smoochy!&#8221;) have done.</p>
<p>If you can actually get this to the screen, I&#8217;ll be there on opening night in the front row. <img src='http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-34617</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-34617</guid>
		<description>Timmy - Sorry man, you&#039;re way off the mark. A &quot;Zucker style zanny comedy&quot; routine would not be effective as a feature-length film. As a SNL skit, all these ideas would work fine. Everyone would fall over laughing. But then what? 

Not that SNL would have the cojones, of course.

Want to begin to change the Hollywood culture? We need 95-minute satires, not skits. Take a SERIOUS subject, and make it into a gitty noir comedy by exposing the duplicity and the groupthink of the elite left. 

Some possible venues:

1. Islamic fundamentalism
2. Eco-terrorism
3. Anti-war activism
4. Campus censorship
5. Race relations

But those are SERIOUS topics, you protest - surely they would make poor fodder for comedy. But they would make great subjects for dark comedy. Dark comedy is hard to pull off - MUCH harder than zanny comedy. But it can be SO effective as a film. 

The left took the ugliness of war and thermonuclear holocaust (to name but two examples) and made them into the finest dark comedy ever seen. We need to do the same. Again, many leftists will say that conservatives CANNOT do it because we lack imagination and a sense of irony. My question is, are they correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timmy &#8211; Sorry man, you&#8217;re way off the mark. A &#8220;Zucker style zanny comedy&#8221; routine would not be effective as a feature-length film. As a SNL skit, all these ideas would work fine. Everyone would fall over laughing. But then what? </p>
<p>Not that SNL would have the cojones, of course.</p>
<p>Want to begin to change the Hollywood culture? We need 95-minute satires, not skits. Take a SERIOUS subject, and make it into a gitty noir comedy by exposing the duplicity and the groupthink of the elite left. </p>
<p>Some possible venues:</p>
<p>1. Islamic fundamentalism<br />
2. Eco-terrorism<br />
3. Anti-war activism<br />
4. Campus censorship<br />
5. Race relations</p>
<p>But those are SERIOUS topics, you protest &#8211; surely they would make poor fodder for comedy. But they would make great subjects for dark comedy. Dark comedy is hard to pull off &#8211; MUCH harder than zanny comedy. But it can be SO effective as a film. </p>
<p>The left took the ugliness of war and thermonuclear holocaust (to name but two examples) and made them into the finest dark comedy ever seen. We need to do the same. Again, many leftists will say that conservatives CANNOT do it because we lack imagination and a sense of irony. My question is, are they correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hennessy XO</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/01/12/a-directors-most-patriotic-role/comment-page-2/#comment-34481</link>
		<dc:creator>Hennessy XO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=16313#comment-34481</guid>
		<description>Gutfeld, you stinking infidel dog! You&#039;re not even Jewish but have a name that makes it sound like you are! It&#039;s like having a name like Barack Obama. Sounds muslim, but isn&#039;t. Enough of your infidel tricks and machinations! Surely you don&#039;t think the Islamo-fascists are dumb enough to fall for this! It&#039;s not like they are easily manipulated by promises of free movie tickets, a free Blackberry or IPod for filling out a simple online survey, or seventy two (count em&#039; folks!) virgins for vaporizing themselves. Oh, wait...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutfeld, you stinking infidel dog! You&#8217;re not even Jewish but have a name that makes it sound like you are! It&#8217;s like having a name like Barack Obama. Sounds muslim, but isn&#8217;t. Enough of your infidel tricks and machinations! Surely you don&#8217;t think the Islamo-fascists are dumb enough to fall for this! It&#8217;s not like they are easily manipulated by promises of free movie tickets, a free Blackberry or IPod for filling out a simple online survey, or seventy two (count em&#8217; folks!) virgins for vaporizing themselves. Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
