Comments on: It’s Morning-After In America

By: garment news daily

garment news daily — Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:36:48 +0000

Sources…

[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……

By: AmericanHeretic

AmericanHeretic — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:08:23 +0000

Don't blame me, I voted for the American.

By: stephanie

stephanie — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:45:46 +0000

It is when we relish in our gifts and uniqueness and not begrudge someone else theirs that we work the best together.

The Democrats would tell you that this is NOT FAIR….
Check out their charter: http://www.democrats.org/pdfs/charter.pdf

"At the heart of our party lies a fundamental conviction, that Americans must not only be free, but they
must live in a fair society.
We believe it is the responsibility of government to help us achieve this fair society."

Didn't they ever learn that life isn't fair? And who are THEY to say WHAT is fair? That people need the freedom to make choices and mistakes, to struggle and to flourish, to succeed AND to fail! To utilize and develope their God given gifts and talents! To do so as individuals, families, businesses, and a society….

Without FREEDOM we will all end up like the nameless, faceless guys in the red shirts. They give one up every episode without blinking an eye.

By: stephanie

stephanie — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:45:03 +0000

Too often it seems like society and our GOVERNMENT is talking about leveling the playing field. Everyone being equal. Everyone having the same opportunities. Same experiences, etc…. But what is that? Isn't that blatantly throwing in the face of sanity that PEOPLE AREN'T THE SAME!!!

We are suppose to have different experiences. We all have different make up-emotional, physical, and psychilogical. We are that way for a reason-so that we can share to gifts, insights, and experiences with those around us. To that we too can form into 'teams' in order to accomplish more together than would ever be possible alone.

If we were all Captian Kirks-well, it would be fun for a while-but lefts face it, there would be a lot of emotionality and 'congregating' and boldly going where no man has gone before-BUT who will get us there and how? Who will take care of us if we should get sick or injured? Tell us when we need to take a step back-or direct us in a good sword fight?

By: stephanie

stephanie — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:44:22 +0000

And by that I mean-Scottie had no desire to be Spock. Chekov was totally into being himself. Uhura was strong and powerful and assertive in herself! She knew who she was and she LOVED who she was! Sulu, Spock, Kirk, and more-all the characters were strong and confident. And they worked together-voluntarily. For they knew that ALL were needed in order to make things work properly. Each member of the team is needed to be a success.
With their own gifts, talents, and expertise. Not begrudging the Captain because he WAS the captain. When Spock relinguished command to Kirk-and then came back to help the team-he KNEW his gift was for being the first officer. Nothing else would do him justice.

By: stephanie

stephanie — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:43:45 +0000

"This summer has given me a special gift. One I was truly not expecting which makes it all the sweeter. A very well done 'Star Trek' movie! I admit, I am a Trekkie. I grew up with re-runs of the original Star Trek. I LOVED the characters, the adventures! It opened up my mind to think about the future in positive ways. The possibilities of new technology and discovery! It was wonderful:)
The new Star Trek did Gene Roddenberry proud-focusing on the characters and their relationships and the IMPORTANCE of those relationships-not just to their own survival-but to all mankinds. AND they were able to do it with everyone KNOWING WHO THEY ARE.

By: Hermie

Hermie — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:37:19 +0000

With his 'wise Latina' and who knows how many SCOTUS radical justices he installs, they'll simply state that the Constitution is UnConstitutional, and he won't need an election.

By: ladykrystyna

ladykrystyna — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:20:37 +0000

You know, I think like this often, so you are not alone. Not by a long shot. Currently, I have semi-convinced myself that he will not be able to turn us into a totalitarian state without a serious fight that would make him look really really bad, unless of course, he had the capability to become the President of the World. But then the conpsiracy theory starts to get too kooky.

Instead, I think it's more about just making the U.S. less important and less powerful than it is (or was). Just taking us down a notch and making it difficult for us to get back where we were before.

In any event, your feelings are not out of ordinary.

By: Ken in Irvine

Ken in Irvine — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:21:31 +0000

Playing the fiddle implies he is doing nothing to stop the fire. To me, it seems like he is trucking in gasoline to throw onto the fire.

By: Joe Baker

Joe Baker — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:13:29 +0000

Gary, this needed to be said, kudos to you for having the courage of your convictions. I agree with everything in this article.