‘X-Men: First Class’: A Political Philosopher’s Summer Blockbuster?
by Ezra DulisX-Men: First Class had virtually everything going against it in pre-production– series fatigue (it’s the fifth entry in Fox’s X-Men saga), none of the original actors in starring roles, 1960s period costumes–on paper, it seemed like the ultimate studio cash-in, only to be outdone by the inevitable X-Men in Space: Electric Space Boogaloo from Space (in 3D!). Fortunately, it’s nothing of the sort.
Despite many flaws common to the superhero genre, First Class is quite possibly the best film in the series, not because it’s chock full of impressive special effects and action, but because broiling beneath its main characters’ performances are ideas–not just any ideas, but the central political and philosophical questions of the film’s time period whose minutiae our modern pundits still grapple over. This is not so much a review as a jumping-off point for discussion, so beware of spoilers ahead.
First Class focuses on young Magneto (Michael Fassbender) and Professor X (James McAvoy), at this point known as Erik Lehnshnerr and Charles Xavier, framing their worldviews through their respective experiences of World War II. Magneto is a Holocaust survivor forced to watch his own mother gunned down by Sebastian Shaw (a scenery-chewing Kevin Bacon), while X, though British, lives untouched by the war in New York, comfortable and affluent. As such, Magneto manifests the deep cynicism of Europeans, who decades before the first world war prophesied that civilization would make war a thing of the past, and X embodies the optimism of his young, victorious, prosperous nation.
If the film has one fatal flaw, it’s that McAvoy’s Professor X is a monstrously one-dimensional good guy–perfectly empathetic, perfectly charismatic, perfectly humble. He’s given a few humanizing moments of triviality in the first act, but once the central conflict kicks in, he merely serves as the angelic foil to the deeply tormented, deeply human, and deeply moving Magneto. Michael Fassbender, best known for his brief turn in Inglourious Basterds, deserves an Oscar nomination for his work here. He takes charge of the role with intimidating physicality, harnessing intense emotions into subtle shifts in Magneto’s inevitable path to top-hat-and-cape-wearing, mustache-tweaking evil. Yes, though we know exactly where he’s going, Fassbender injects suspense into the actual mechanics of the transformation; we care about him, sitting mortified but silently cheering when he gets his moment of revenge.
And that is the central drama of First Class: it’s not the Cuban Missile Crisis, stopping the madman Sebastian Shaw, or the shoehorned attempts at modern political salience (one a lame Patriot Act dig, the other a tired “Baby, you were born this way!” after-school special monologue)–it’s that the protagonist, for a reason we completely sympathize with, is making a horrendous, morally bankrupt choice. And this is where the politics kick in: Despite the film’s attempt to morally equate the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., Magneto’s arc shows the fundamental difference between the political philosophies behind the Soviet Union and America.
Young Erik Lehnshnerr suffers at the hands of Nazis, those who used superficial traits as justification for declaring certain human beings ontologically inferior to themselves, while Charles Xavier flourishes in the wealth of Americans, whose nation was founded on the idea that God creates common men no differently than kings. I hesitate to continue referring to it as American vs. Soviet ideology; it really is served best by the terms of Mark Levin’s bestselling book: Liberty and Tyranny. This contrast screams at the audience in a central dialogue scene wherein X and Magneto discuss their betrayal by the mutant-phobic CIA. Trying his best to dissuade revenge, X remarks, “We have it in us to be the better men.” Magneto coldly retorts, “We already are the better men.”
The heart of tyranny is the belief that one knows better than another how he should live his life (or whether he should live at all) because somehow the one is superior over the other. Of course, Magneto is a lot more powerful than the average human–able to control metal with his mind, pull a submarine into the air and all that–but power does not equal righteousness, which X was telling him in the first place. In the film’s climactic action scene, Magneto decides that it would be best to start a nuclear war between America and the Soviets, wholly embracing the eugenicist ideology that killed his mother. That kernel of tyranny, the belief in his own ascendancy, becomes the justification for genocide.
But the heart of liberty is the belief that each person, though they may sometimes get it wrong, ultimately has their best interests at heart, and that self-interest should be respected. Charles Xavier realizes that his self-interest–meeting, grooming, and uniting mutants around the world–is not inherently at odds with the interests of humans, so his progress does not have to come at others’ expense, as Magneto has decided. The parallels between our metal-tossing protagonist and the real world are sadly spot-on. The authors of the Frankfurt School, thankful as they were for the shelter and freedom America provided as they fled Nazi Germany, soon propagated the same insidious ideology that brought about Nazism: that some humans are more equal than others, and those more equal should revolt and take away the way of life enjoyed by those who are less equal.
These philosophical undercurrents give X-Men: First Class the heft that its predecessors strained for but never reached. Whether director Matthew Vaughn intended them as subtext or not, the clashing ideas of Magneto and Professor X constitute the primary political conflict of the 20th century stripped to its basic arguments. Coupled with Fassbender’s can’t-miss performance, this is one summer blockbuster that’s gonna stick with me for a little while.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
77 Comments
I'm ambivalent about seeing X-Men: First Class. As a long time fan of the comics (I bought my first issue when Claremont/Cockrum introduced the Brood (in circa 1982-3ish?) and promptly scraped up every penny I could to go back to issue #92.
The comic fan boi in me has a problem with altering time lines but I can turn off the fantasy historian inside me and enjoy a good film. I just didn't think this was going to be a good one. I still need convincing…
I saw it yesterday and I have to say it is the best out of the X Men series and it is the closest thing to to the comic books of my youth. I was explaining to my wife that I earned an A in comic book reading while I failed Spanish class and this movie brought me back to those times, when Marvel was the hot comic to read, in the course of me explaining a certain issue of X-Men that Jim Lee (has to be hands done one of the best comic pencil artist) and Chris Claremont has done I explained that the interaction between Charles and Erik is key to the story and the other characters are just filler. The dynamic between James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender was just simple awesome. You can feel the inner rage of the young Magneto and the need to be accepted from the young Professor X. The young actors did great credit to the characters that were established by Sir Patrick Stewart and Sir Ian McKellen.
a problem with altering timelines? com'n, the x-men were founded on altering timelines. Bishop? Cable? Rachel Summers? It's a great movie and really, thats like their number 1 plot device, so it shouldn't bother you that much.
Remember the part where the Cuban Missile Crisis was caused by American cowboy gung-ho attitudes? that was totally awesome.
I totally disagree with this and several other reviews. I don't know where everyone sees the many dimensions Fassbender brought to Magneto, but I didn't see them at all. The story actually fell flat to me simply because it failed hard at being what it was supposed to be about: the relationship of Xavier and Magneto.
The only bright lights to the movie are really the excellent work from Jennifer Lawrence as young Mystique and her relationships with the other young X-Men.
Oh, and the two very amusing cameos in the film.
Or I noticed it and found it irrelevant to the film's subtext (see 2 paragraphs above the second image… reading comprehension really can turn your life around, folks).
I LOVED First Class, in large part because of some of the same themes that you mention in your article. As much as I enjoyed the first two installments of the X-Men franchise, I do think that First Class is the best of them all (I hesitate to even include the horrific Last Stand and lackluster Origins: Wolverine in the equation) It manages to stay faithful to the original look and feel of the X-Men without coming across as schmaltzy. Even the blue and gold outfits worked!
Fassbender does indeed deserve an Oscar nod for his performance. I enjoy comic book movies mostly as fun fantasy indulgences, but I can't remember the last time that I actually felt moved by an actor's performance. He brought a real pathos and dimension to the character of Lehnsherr/Magneto that even Ian McKellan couldn't. McAvoy gives just as strong a performance, although it is Fassbender who clearly steals the show.
What makes any comic book movie successful is its ability to intertwine fantasy with reality in as convincing a way as possible. There is a much greater requirement for suspension of disbelief in these movies, so the viewer is not usually expected to engage on any real emotional level. You usually have to check your adult self at the door, and let your inner 8 year-old do the viewing. First Class manages to create an intelligent story that the inner 8 year-old can marvel at, while the adult side appreciates the intricacies of plot and actor performance.
As with any comic book movie, there will be diehard fan-boys who will manage to nitpick certain inconsistencies But any inconsistencies in timeline or character are far outweighed by excellent writing, directing, acting and special FX.
I just don't think that "Despite the film’s attempt to morally equate the U.S. and the U.S.S.R" is true. I enjoyed the movie, but I walked out knowing that in the minds of some of those who made the movie, the US Government and soldiers were the bad guys and the USSR government and soldiers were peace-loving. That's not a moral equivalent, it's a moral reversal.
Thanks for the heads-up. One question: Is it OK to take a 9-year old to? The standard? He has seen Thor, the entire Star Wars series, and the last Pirates of the Caribbean film. I am OK with sci-fi mayhem and historically correct violence.
I saw it Sat and enjoyed it, although I don't remember the Cuban Missile Crisis as shown in the movie
It was much better than the recent Patrick Stewart X-Men.
Saw Super 8 yesterday and can also recommend that.
I would recommend a site such as pluggedinonline.com for content reviews; they're very thorough.
I would say so.
Not one boob to be seen.
Metaphorically and figuratively.
I love casual insults that fundamentally rewrite American history in support of totalitarian evil.
Hmm….I really enjoyed the movie, but I have to say, my opinion of the political overtones were different. I say "overtones" because I don't think "subtext" is quite accurate. Rather than adding a nuanced dimension to the story, I felt like those lines of dialogue were very clumsily inserted (i.e. the Patriot Act and "born this way" aspects) and were distracting. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been in there, but I think they certainly could have been handled with more finesse….except that the writers probably wanted to make sure no one missed those messages, so blunt-force trauma was the preferred delivery method. Oh well. Either way, I still enjoyed it.
Normal 9-year olds can handle the occasional naked breast.
It's the graphic displays of torture that does them in.
X-Men First Class was OK.
I'm just REALLY bored with the "Nazis" as bad guys theme. It's so tired. And Hollywierd is still cranking them out. I have seen HUNDREDS of movies and shows with this theme. I'm so bored with it that I refuse to watch movies with it anymore. If I had known this was in the movie I would have just avoided it.
There are MODERN Jew-hating bad guys who SAW PEOPLE'S HEADS OFF! Try making more movies with them as bad guys.
Germans are the only bad guys where you don't have to have a "good guy" character to show that you're not anti-German, unlike when the bad guy is a muslim, a russian, chinese, etc.
(I know, I know. Lensherr was a Jew and the Nazi thing was part of his character development. Still–I'm SOOOOOOOOOOO tired of it!)
Grow up Hollywood. NEW BAD GUYS, PLEASE!
STRIFE, the other brother of Cable if my memory serves correctly
Not being a fanboy (did read some of the comics in omnibuses, could not stand spending $1+ on just a 10 minute read
, I really enjoyed this movie. Michael Fassbender was great, and Kevin Bacon almost stole the show. I did'nt think any of the other actors were slouches, and the woman that played Mystique was good. I'll buy this one.
I know what you mean, but how old would Superman and Clark Kent be if we kept the original time line?
I liked First Class – it's the best X-Men flick since X2, anyway. I'm kind of an easy mark on these, though, as I even liked some things about The Last Stand and Wolverine, though I recognize both those films have their problems. Like the reviewer said, Fassbender is great, and I liked that Matthew Vaughn maybe seemed to be embracing the comic book nature of things a bit more than Bryan Singer did initially. Felt more like a real X-Men movie to me than, say, the first film did at the time.
As far as political subtext goes, it's always kind of been there, even in the X-Men comics. Maybe it seemed a bit more heightened this time out since they tied the story into real world events. I would have to figure the irony of where Magneto's position ends up, given where he begins, is intentional in the writing, at least, but any deeper subtext of exploring 20th century politics is probably coincidental, or a result of the setting.
Good comment, but the real reason I voted up your comment was the screen name, Ford Prefect.
It was a valid criticism, Ezra, that a BigH reviewer should at least mention a politically motivated history re-write that makes the US into a bad guy in the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Also, can we finally put a name to the love that dares not speak its name? You write about "the shoehorned attempts at modern political salience" and cite the line “Baby, you were born this way!” Why not go one sentence further and explain that all of the X-Men series use the mutants' problems as a metaphor for the problems of homosexuals in the real world?
Courageous writing can really turn your life around, Ez.
This is the movie that has that incredibly clunky line "They didn't ask, so I didn't tell". Right?
Couldn't agree more. She truly is a pretty face, but void of any real ability to emote. We just saw Super 8 last night, enjoyed it very much. Looking forward to your review of that movie. Good post.
I am not a big fan of sci fi actioner but I really enjoyed the film "XMen 1st Class". I enjoyed it so much I have seen it twice already. Yes it does have the clunky line "They didn't ask, so I didn't tell". But I thought it is clever of how they used it. I also enjoyed the line and its use "If you are not with us, then you are against us" plus a few others. Beautiful scene of the actors sitting on the steps of the Lincoln memorial with ABE statute in the background. Oh, and the film is exciting and smart and all the cast give excellent performances.
This film displayed all of the reasons I really can't stand the X-Men: Hand-wringing relativism, and clumsy allegory for gay rights.
Right from the very beginning, I was taken out of this film. How could you not be when a Nazi coin is shown, and then it turns to show the X symbol. Two sides of the same coin — right off the bat.
The first half was awesome: Magneto hunting Nazis — can't go wrong with that.
Then this stupid film devolved into another exercise in relativism. According to the film, the Communists and the Capitalists really aren't any different — it's just this evil ex-Nazi that's stirring up trouble. Give me a break.
Is it really that hard to show Soviets — and Communists in general — to be the murdering, individual-squashing thugs they really are?
I don't really follow comic books and I'm certainly not an X-men fanboy. That said, I enjoyed the movie quite a bit (and I've been to the movie theaters maybe 2 times since I saw The Dark Knight). I actually liked this movie experience, in some ways, more than The Dark Knight (which I liked). The ideas at the heart of First Class make it compelling, and Michael Fassbender as Erik/Magneto is really impressive. He makes it worth watching, and you really want him to choose the right path.
we ARE the bad guys , why is it so hard to comprehend ?
It should be noted that Fassbender was more recently seen in the excellent recent version of "Jane Eyre" as a wonderfully brooding & hunky Mr. Rochester against "Alice in Wonderland's" Alice, Mia Wasikowska. I'm not sure his acting was all that great in X-Men, but he sure filled out a black turtleneck nicely. As a long time comic reader, it's sort of funny to me that people are thinking the themes of the movie are somehow new–the comics have been hashing these over for decades. I think it's been said before that the director saw Xavier/Magneto as MLK/Malcolm X. When Mystique went "blue" and declared she was "mutant and proud," to me it was like a black person of the era ditching straightened hair and growing a 'fro. There was much ret-conning of the X-Men film series to be sure, but I think they pulled it off well. Not sure if there's viability to continuing the franchise as period films, but this was a successful trip to the past. Marvel is having a heckuva summer–great work with Thor, X-Men, and I'm really looking forward to Captain America (and how they're going to retcon Nick Fury back into a white WWII vet and then back into Sam L. Jackson for "Avengers").
That conclusion isn't supported by the evidence.
It's just more liberal drivel. They don't even try to hide it anymore. I just want them to stop hijacking superhero movies. They made Thor a platform for amnesty and open borders, and now X-Men is all about gay rights. They've totally abandoned the original message that Stan Lee used it for: as an allegory for the wrongful nature of segregation.
"Hank, I didn't know you were a mutant!" "You didn't ask, so I didn't tell" and not to mention Mystique running every triumphant conversation over a spike strip by awkwardly inserting the phrase "Mutant and Proud!" about a dozen times it seemed like.
P.S. they've scrubbed out JFK's reading of Cuba as "Cuber" from the trailer. They didn't scrub it out of the movie though.
I discuss it a little more here http://abetterweapon.blogspot.com/2011/06/what-x-...
Au contraire– Thor was a brilliantly subversive ANTI-immigration Birther flick. SPOILERS:
Loki, child of a barbarian nation, gets secretly whisked away to a foreign, civilized nation where he is undeservedly fast-tracked into a leadership position, then uses deceit to usurp power. He's figured out a way to travel between realms without using the proper channels, acting as a coyote to the Frost Giants who are trying to steal back that which was legitimately won by Asgard in a previous war, claiming that they have a right to it merely because of their race. The way that Thor ultimately defeats this foreign-born despot known for his cunning trickery is by destroying the means of transportation between realms– in a sense, building a border fence.
So, yeah– you've got it all wrong. It's the EXACT opposite of what you were saying. They started production AFTER Obama became President; you don't think that's coincidental at ALL?
I took my 15 year old grandson to see this movie and we both hated it. Too long and BORING!
I'll make this short and to the point: X Men First Class is a brilliant film. Not just as a comic book movie but a great movie in general. The dynamic between Xavier and Eric is fascinating and the fact that the film doesn't draw a line as to who the audience should side with makes the film that much more thought provoking.
Certainly , it is one of the best comic book movies ever envisioned , right up there with The Dark Knight , Spiderman 2 , X 2 and the first ( Donner ) Superman movie. Time will tell I suppose. Already , I cant wait till the blu ray comes out.
"we ARE the bad guys , why is it so hard to comprehend ?"
Maybe because we don't have gulags? Not yet anyway — give the Left a few more years…
Saw the movie even though I didn't want to, and it ended up being far better than I expected. The discussion during the chess game at the Lincoln Memorial was great.
As far as equating US to Soviet, that wasn't the point. It was that the reaction of people to those who are different is a basic human issue. We're all tribal at some level, identifying with those like us first. We even look for those things that make us similar. It's what the Xmen series was about, it's why Magneto is a concentration camp survivor. For those who see this as a homosexual thing it can be any 'tribal' difference- religion, economic class, jock vs nerd. Or good X-man using his talents to support society vs evil Xman using his talents for personal gain. Whatever. Sure the launching at the beach was very one-dimensional but made for great visuals and the point of the film that a more realistic treatment wouldn't, it was an extreme to make the point.
For me, Michael Fassbender made the film, it had it's drawbacks and wasn't perfect but again, was far better than I expected.
Too long. Maybe. Boring. Not at all, not from where I sat. However, you will probably like the Transformer movie coming up. Its not as long and exceptionally loud.
Not "we." Just you, and your fellow komeraden on ze left.
Mind officially blown.
Yup. Like I said, blunt-force delivery. No cleverness.
I plan to see the movie but the review seems to strive mightily to accentuate the peanuts in a pile of liberal bullsh*+.
when FEMA is denying claims, gulags won't happen..
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/06/13/fema-tells-tor...
thanks for keeping hate out of your comment..
much appreciated..
Actually, its just about how having absolute power over everything you can possibly imagine is the same as being Black. So, step off, you powerless Crackers.
I had to shake my head at that line. It wasn't needed.
One of my main objections to the whole X-Men world is the mutant-phobia of basically everyone who isn't a mutant. U.S. senators or CIA bosses trying to either change, control or subdue them is just overblown. In First Class, there were the two exceptions: the one CIA operative and the Rose Byrne agent (who was stunning in her undies, by the way).
The perfect example of what I'm trying to convey is the ending when the first knee-jerk reaction of the U.S. CIA and military and the Soviet leaders was to bombard the beach.
Through the whole movie I was thinking that if I personally knew a sexy blue girl with red hair (love redheads) that could change her appearance or a hot girl with insect wings that could fly, it would be awesome.
Interesting. I dug up my DVD of the first X-MEN movie the other day and watched the extras — the mockumentary purporting to be Senate hearings could not have been any more explicit; ALL of the pro-mutant senators were Democrats, and ALL of the mutie-haters were Republicans. This series has always been political, rather ham-handedly so.
FIRST CLASS isn't as irritating in this regard as the others have been, but it's still pretty clear who's who (if the "They didn't ask, I didn't tell" line doesn't give the game away, what will?).
I disagree about Professor X being completely good, though. In the moral framework of the movie, his refusal to accept Raven's "blue" form is a sin punishable by a bullet to the spine.
Fassbender is known for "Inglourious Basterds" – what?
Not for his roles in "300" or "Centurion"?
And I saw the latest-remake of "Jane Eyre" for him!
@IgorM
Speaking of breasts, I came across this blog review of the movie, "X-Men First Class Leaves No Breast Un-Ogled"
http://zeldalily.com/index.php/2011/06/x-men-firs...
Isn't it interesting that a liberal feminist is complaining about women showing too much skin?
TImes are indeed a'chaging.
@mutnodjmet13
To save a step, here is Plugged In's take on "X-Men First Class":
http://www.pluggedin.com/movies/intheaters/xmenfi...
The perfect example of what I'm trying to convey is the ending when the first knee-jerk reaction of the U.S. CIA and military and the Soviet leaders was to bombard the beach.
That one scene almost killed the whole movie for me.
Okay, but can someone tell me if they had to dumb down the script, as James McAvoy says the English have to do, so Americans can make sense of films. Frankly, he should be kissing American ass. The ones that pay to see liberal drivel and make him millions. I pass. Maybe DVD, maybe.
You are a moron, why is that so hard to comprehend? (No, really, you are)
I'm not sure if they dumbed down the script, because basically, the premise isn't one that requires extra quotients of intelligence. It is a movie based on a comic book. Sometimes, they can be intelligent and enjoyable, but most of the time, they're just enjoyable.
And McAvoy hasn't been in a great movie, English or American, ever, to my knowledge. So take it as a snooty Englishman's assault on American superiority in almost everything except maybe FUTBOL!
Saw it over the weekend. Great film with a few li'l quirks. Secondary characters really are given extraordinarily little screen time, but it's kinda/sorta acceptable that way b/c the meat of the story revolves around the two or three leads. Vastly better than XMEN 2 or XMEN 3, I highly recommend it. Plus, it features the real-life mutant of Kevin Bacon (hello? agelessness?) in a central supporting role. I would add that it's honestly a bit long — or, at least, it feels a bit long — but as the wife and I were chatting about it we were both hard-pressed to find anything that could've been trimmed necessarily.
Yeah, I could agree that it felt a bit longer than it needed to be. As I said in my own post, I'd be hard pressed to come up with sequences that could've been cut AND maintained the story as is.
For the person who stated that McAvoy hasn't appeared in a great film. Actually McAvoy has appeared in some critically acclaimed films and he has being nominated for the BAFTA award twice and a Golden Globe as best actor. "Becoming Jane and The Last King of Scotland and Atonement. He was also the lead in the very good actioner "Wanted" wtih Jolie and is set to appear in the sequel "Wanted 2".
You are one of the bad guys, though just a flunky.
HTH. HAND.
I enjoyed the film – much better than the past X-Men. A friend who is a real comic guy says that this film – a reboot – is truer to the canon.
Compare to the last Star Trek over the past ones….
The cameo was funny wasn't it?
Agree with the missile thing. Things that aren't completely outlandish – just mildly – seem better for me.
We'll have privatized prisons, filled to the maximum by good old capitalists, with strict judges to keep the cells full.
Don't go. If you think it's liberal BS, then just don't go. We won't notice you're not there. From everything I've heard, it's a very good film. I'm not even a fan of X-Men, but I'm thinking of seeing this one. Most everyone else won't even notice the big sinister liberal message that you all see.
Maybe you need to look at that crisis closer. Even Kennedy said it was our own fault that it got that far. Russia was responding to the United States shoving missiles up their Soviet asses, by having them in Turkey. Russia figured, what the hell, sauce for the gander. Russia finally agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba if the U. S. removed the missiles from Turkey. The United States had to ask for more time to comply, because the missiles in Turkey were NATO missiles, and that whole process would take time.
And the X-Men borrows the metaphor of a persecuted people, and the homosexual allusion is only the most convenient. But it's not to be taken seriously.
I've studied the CMC quite closely, thank you. You should realize that it did not occur in a vacuum, but in the context of Soviet Communist expansionism (you know, that whole "Cold War" thing). Despite (or rather, because of) Roosevelt's cozying up to the second biggest mass murderer in human history, Stalin and his successors continued to attack republican democracies and Christianity around the world; Cuba was their latest, greatest success. Many in the US were intent on rolling back this gain; after all, in a geopolitical context, we had allowed the USSR to surround itself with satellite states, if fair is fair, why should we let a satellite state 90 miles from our shores? The Soviets put the missiles there simply to avoid a US invasion, and took them out when they got the agreement that they wanted. They knew we would never really allow the missiles to stay.
The moral equivalency is the real problem here, though. Communism in the 20th century was a tyrannical, fascist force that deprived hundreds of millions of people of all liberty, and resulted in the murder of 100 million people outright. Mao was the greatest murderer in world history, followed by Stalin (Hitler, who was also a socialist but not a "communist," is number three on that list). Reagan hit the nail on the head when he called the Soviet Union an "evil empire." There can be no moral equivalency between an aggressive, non-peace loving communist empire, and a peace-loving republican democracy like the United States.
IMHO, the homosexual allusion is not "the most convenient," it is the entire purpose of the X-Men series. But then again, I haven't had my head in the sand for the past three decades, and realize that there are more than just one or two Liberal/Progressive homosexual activists in Hollywood.
Yes, you Liberal Progressives are indeed the bad guys, thanks for finally standing up and admitting this fact.
"You are a moron, why is that so hard to comprehend?"
I know there's a term for a self-answering question, I just can't remember what it is right now, but at any rate, GOOD JOB.
Socialists don't believe in prisons, they believe in murder, only they call it "rendering everyone equal."
Well, it IS a BigH review, that's kinda one of the main purposes behind this blog. He didn't say "don't see this movie, it sucks," just "go into it with your eyes open." Really, he was pointing out the conservative (in the modern American sense) arguments that the movie seems to approve of.
BTW, certainly, it was "our" fault that there was any crisis at all, starting with "our" initial support of a murderous communist revolutionary, followed by the disastrous fiasco known as the Bay of Pigs Invasion, and then followed by "our" pussyfooting around when we could easily have just bombed the Soviet's missiles and sunk every ship within 200 miles of Cuba, and dared them to say squat about it. If only we had elected a different "war hero" for President, the Cubans would be enjoying the freedom of a democratic republic today.
Thanks for the reference, I have an almost-9-year old boy and was wondering the same thing.
Thanks, finally had time to read/watch the review. I thought it was an excellent review; I'll still watch the movie, but as for taking my nearly 9 year old son, uh, no.
Don't get stupid.
Correction: Don't get stupider.
Before I met the true love of my life, I was engaged to be married to a beautiful Cuban lady, for whom I will always have the utmost admiration. I listened to her father and mother for many hours about life in Cuba before Castro, and of their ultimate escape with their young son (my fiance was born stateside); her father had to shoot one of Castro's guards in order to escape.
The story that they tell, and that countless other Cuban escapees have told, is very much at odds with your mindless liberal drivel. I prefer the firsthand accounts of people who actually lived there, loved Cuba with all of their heart, and are heartbroken at what happened to their family, friends and their country.
Your BS is not well-meaning, it is a damnable lie, and you sir are a damnable liar. As a socialist, however, I don't see how you can be anything else.
Maybe her family was one of those people living off the largess of the previous regime. Maybe they were the problem. Here are the facts: revolutions do not take place in countries where people are happy, and Castro's revolution was enormously popular at the time. And even with its mistake,s you can bet you don't have a population mad for the return of Batista's days. Che himself made literacy a requirement to joining his forces; that's how bad illiteracy was. You had in Cuba an elite class — say, those same people who could afford to escape to another country — enjoying things just as they were before that damned Castro came along and messed it up. Who can blame them for being bitter? In the end, they squandered their responsibilities to their country, and they paid the price.
You, sir, are a right-wing fanatic, and your view that socialists are in general liars shows just how ignorant you are. Socialists exist all over the world, of all stripes, good and bad. Socialist are at bottom democratic — egalitarian — and they've been elected democratically, their programs have been tweaked democratically, and only an idiot would think that socialists in general are liars. You, sir, are an idiot. You're one of those morons who sees socialism as the antithesis to democracy instead of what it is, an answer to the abuses of capitalism.
Loki's presence in Asgard falls more into a subversive birther undertone, but the anti-immigration connection doesn't seem quite as strong. Speaking more directly to Thor's plight in New Mexico, it came across as very overtly sympathetic to an open-border policy, no subversion required.
So yeah– its just my opinion, I don't care to proclaim I have the absolute truth on the what is or isn't a liberal undertone. A lot of movies have come out after Obama became President, if I happen to find a storyline that I can argue has a conservative slant, I'll gladly take pleasure in it, but I'm not foolish enough to think Hollywood would do such a thing intentionally.
Awesome film. Michael Fassbender is fantastic in the movie. I liked that Magneto's submarine had white shag carpet and bar. Oh behave.
You must be logged in to post a comment.