<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Official: Spidey in the Tank for Obama (&amp; Ashford &amp; Simpson, Too)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:11:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: INFINITYbound &#187; Watchmen (Updated 04 MAR 09)</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-272054</link>
		<dc:creator>INFINITYbound &#187; Watchmen (Updated 04 MAR 09)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-272054</guid>
		<description>[...] 04 MAR 09: Sounds like Debbie Schlussel considers the movie will be a permanent blot on the culture, to say the least. Don&#8217;t sell her short in the area of comics. She&#8217;s a collector. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 04 MAR 09: Sounds like Debbie Schlussel considers the movie will be a permanent blot on the culture, to say the least. Don&#8217;t sell her short in the area of comics. She&#8217;s a collector. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OK this Obama-lovefest crap is getting way too creepy &#171; DPGI - the aftermath</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-116370</link>
		<dc:creator>OK this Obama-lovefest crap is getting way too creepy &#171; DPGI - the aftermath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-116370</guid>
		<description>[...] January 8, 2009 &#183; No Comments  Headline: It’s Official: Spidey in the Tank for Obama (&amp; Ashford &amp; Simpson, Too) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 8, 2009 &middot; No Comments  Headline: It’s Official: Spidey in the Tank for Obama (&amp; Ashford &amp; Simpson, Too) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OgreVI</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-29105</link>
		<dc:creator>OgreVI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-29105</guid>
		<description>This doesn&#039;t make sense.  The complaining about a comic book, I mean.  Don&#039;t comic artists always write about what&#039;s on the public mind?  And right now there&#039;s no bigger story than Obama.  Everyone&#039;s fascinated, whether they like him or not.  So Marvel wants to cash in on the Inauguration, and the obvious way to do that is to send an assassin after Obama and then have their #1 hero break it up.  That seems pretty simple and straightforward to me.  I&#039;m not sure what the problem is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t make sense.  The complaining about a comic book, I mean.  Don&#8217;t comic artists always write about what&#8217;s on the public mind?  And right now there&#8217;s no bigger story than Obama.  Everyone&#8217;s fascinated, whether they like him or not.  So Marvel wants to cash in on the Inauguration, and the obvious way to do that is to send an assassin after Obama and then have their #1 hero break it up.  That seems pretty simple and straightforward to me.  I&#8217;m not sure what the problem is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah West</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-29029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-29029</guid>
		<description>Not sure this went through...

@HIMSELF  Really? I could have sworn it was the 1930&#039;s,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560674/Christopher-Booker&#039;s-notebook.html
or
http://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm
Or still
http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/cold-hard-facts-take-the-heat-out-of-some-hot-claims/2007/08/17/1186857765035.html

And that is still only looking at the last century or so, when you factor in a longer time period you see that the temperatures in the 90&#039;s weren&#039;t that horribly high.

Look, I know liberals have an aversion to fact, and backing up your position with some sort of reference or citation is considered a weakness, but could you at least try?  It shouldn&#039;t be hard to find something backing up your position, unless your position has nothing to do with evidence but rather a religious fanaticism regarding environmentalism.  

The con of man made global warming can be compared to this.  30 years out of 6000 is about .005%.  Claiming that the world is heating because .005% of the years were hotter is the same as saying that the crime rate is skyrocketing because, over the last  10950 days(30 years), 55 (54.75, or .005%) days have had increased crime.  Or say you want to compare it to the entire (evolutionary thinking) history of earth, about 4 billion years.  30 years of that is about 7.5*10^-9 or .0000000075%, which using the same idea of crime over thirty years would be .000082125 days, or about 7.0956 seconds of increased crime means a increase in crime above the normal.  Basing a claim with out looking at the broader historical context is not only foolish, its bad science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure this went through&#8230;</p>
<p>@HIMSELF  Really? I could have sworn it was the 1930&#8217;s,<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560674/Christopher-Booker" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1560674/Christopher-Booker</a>&#8217;s-notebook.html<br />
or<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepticalscience.com/1934-hottest-year-on-record.htm</a><br />
Or still<br />
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/cold-hard-facts-take-the-heat-out-of-some-hot-claims/2007/08/17/1186857765035.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/cold-hard-facts-take-the-heat-out-of-some-hot-claims/2007/08/17/1186857765035.html</a></p>
<p>And that is still only looking at the last century or so, when you factor in a longer time period you see that the temperatures in the 90&#8217;s weren&#8217;t that horribly high.</p>
<p>Look, I know liberals have an aversion to fact, and backing up your position with some sort of reference or citation is considered a weakness, but could you at least try?  It shouldn&#8217;t be hard to find something backing up your position, unless your position has nothing to do with evidence but rather a religious fanaticism regarding environmentalism.  </p>
<p>The con of man made global warming can be compared to this.  30 years out of 6000 is about .005%.  Claiming that the world is heating because .005% of the years were hotter is the same as saying that the crime rate is skyrocketing because, over the last  10950 days(30 years), 55 (54.75, or .005%) days have had increased crime.  Or say you want to compare it to the entire (evolutionary thinking) history of earth, about 4 billion years.  30 years of that is about 7.5*10^-9 or .0000000075%, which using the same idea of crime over thirty years would be .000082125 days, or about 7.0956 seconds of increased crime means a increase in crime above the normal.  Basing a claim with out looking at the broader historical context is not only foolish, its bad science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-28781</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-28781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m writing back again to say that I am sorry, and that the last post I made wasn&#039;t very kind.  I may not agree about the decisions our country made during the election, but that gives me no right to slander people.  Even though I&#039;m a geek.  *grins*


P.S.:  Yes, I am a conservative, and proud of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m writing back again to say that I am sorry, and that the last post I made wasn&#8217;t very kind.  I may not agree about the decisions our country made during the election, but that gives me no right to slander people.  Even though I&#8217;m a geek.  *grins*</p>
<p>P.S.:  Yes, I am a conservative, and proud of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himself</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-27165</link>
		<dc:creator>Himself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-27165</guid>
		<description>Reality to Jonah West;

The 90&#039;s was the HOTTEST decade on record. The friggin ice caps at BOTH poles are shrinking at an ever increasing rate. Yeah global warming is bunk.

I am just glad that the voters finally had enough of your kind&#039;s right wing create your own reality fact free nuttery...pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality to Jonah West;</p>
<p>The 90&#8217;s was the HOTTEST decade on record. The friggin ice caps at BOTH poles are shrinking at an ever increasing rate. Yeah global warming is bunk.</p>
<p>I am just glad that the voters finally had enough of your kind&#8217;s right wing create your own reality fact free nuttery&#8230;pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Templar</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-26429</link>
		<dc:creator>Templar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-26429</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Funny thing is, back in the days when Marvel was making comics against Hitler you and your kind STILL didn’t like them, because conservatives wanted no part of WWII. It was the people you call ‘liberals’ today that wanted to fight Hitler, conservatives were isolationist.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;The ideology of the comic world is pretty much right where it has been all along, in line with normal people. It’s you - the scary, weird bastards of the far right - that are out of line, just as you always have been. You got your shot at power in the McCarthy and got disgraced, and you got another shot in the Bush era and yes, you are disgraced again.&lt;/i&gt;

Hush, child. The grown-ups are talking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Funny thing is, back in the days when Marvel was making comics against Hitler you and your kind STILL didn’t like them, because conservatives wanted no part of WWII. It was the people you call ‘liberals’ today that wanted to fight Hitler, conservatives were isolationist.</i></p>
<p><i>The ideology of the comic world is pretty much right where it has been all along, in line with normal people. It’s you &#8211; the scary, weird bastards of the far right &#8211; that are out of line, just as you always have been. You got your shot at power in the McCarthy and got disgraced, and you got another shot in the Bush era and yes, you are disgraced again.</i></p>
<p>Hush, child. The grown-ups are talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acanthus</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-23949</link>
		<dc:creator>Acanthus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-23949</guid>
		<description>Actually, Ashford and Simpson did well long before the Eighties:

&quot;Let&#039;s Go Get Stoned&quot;- Ray Charles
&quot;Califoria Soul&quot;- Fifth Dimension, Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell
Also by Marvin and Tammi:
&quot;Ain&#039;t No Mountain High Enough&quot;
&quot;Ain&#039;t Nothing Like The Real Thing&quot;
&quot;Your Precious Love&quot;
&quot;You&#039;re All I Need To Get By&quot;

&quot;Reach Out and Touch (Somebody&#039;s Hand)- Diana Ross
...and so on. They wrote all the above songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Ashford and Simpson did well long before the Eighties:</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s Go Get Stoned&#8221;- Ray Charles<br />
&#8220;Califoria Soul&#8221;- Fifth Dimension, Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell<br />
Also by Marvin and Tammi:<br />
&#8220;Ain&#8217;t No Mountain High Enough&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Ain&#8217;t Nothing Like The Real Thing&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Your Precious Love&#8221;<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;re All I Need To Get By&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Reach Out and Touch (Somebody&#8217;s Hand)- Diana Ross<br />
&#8230;and so on. They wrote all the above songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-23909</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-23909</guid>
		<description>*puts her head in her hands*  Oh no, oh no.  Not Spidey!  My inner geek is screaming her head off.  Hey, don&#039;t get me wrong.....I&#039;d love having an African-American for president.....just......of all the potential candidates......  There are so many African-American politicians that, I believe, would be a much better choice for President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*puts her head in her hands*  Oh no, oh no.  Not Spidey!  My inner geek is screaming her head off.  Hey, don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;..I&#8217;d love having an African-American for president&#8230;..just&#8230;&#8230;of all the potential candidates&#8230;&#8230;  There are so many African-American politicians that, I believe, would be a much better choice for President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah West</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dschlussel/2009/01/08/its-official-spidey-in-the-tank-for-obama-amp-ashford-amp-simpson-too/comment-page-2/#comment-23389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11569#comment-23389</guid>
		<description>@Plissken79  I appologize, I left out Iron Man.  Not only did he fight the bad guys, be the Communist or something else, he also made tons of nifty stuff for the military (and SHIELD).

still, he can&#039;t qutie stand up to the coolness of Uncle Sam
http://ladygatorsplace.com/US/sam-comic.jpg

@MARK  I agree that Wonder Woman looks manly because she&#039;s an amazon.  But as for global warming being fact, I ask you to first define global warming.  Do you mean that Earth naturally warms and cools and that we had been in a warming period but have now entered a cooling period? If thats what you mean, then you are correct.  However, if you mean that the Earth is getting warmer because of increased carbon dioxide and other green house gas output by mankind, then you are mistaken.

I think these scientists sum it up with their research far better then I can.
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm

But if thats not enough, then look at the difference between the readings from the ever dwindling, increasingly urban ground stations, to the satellite and weather ballon reaings, that can cover much more of the surface.  They show minimal to no increase in average temperature over the last few decades.

(Singer, S.  (1998).  Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming&#039;s Unfinished Debate.  Oakland: The Independent Institute)

The arrogance in the idea that we can control the weather by any of our actions is astounding.  If you are an evolutionist you believe that the earth has existed for billions of years before man, and to think man can some how, it the blink of cosmic eye that we&#039;ve been here can destroy the planet is laughable.  If you&#039;re a Young Earth Creationist you believe that God is invariable in control and wouldn&#039;t allow us to destroy the Earth before the Time of Judgement, as well as the fact that this kind of arrogance is what led to the Tower of Babel.

So really, no matter where you stand, you should see Man Made Global Warming for the bunk that it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Plissken79  I appologize, I left out Iron Man.  Not only did he fight the bad guys, be the Communist or something else, he also made tons of nifty stuff for the military (and SHIELD).</p>
<p>still, he can&#8217;t qutie stand up to the coolness of Uncle Sam<br />
<a href="http://ladygatorsplace.com/US/sam-comic.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ladygatorsplace.com/US/sam-comic.jpg</a></p>
<p>@MARK  I agree that Wonder Woman looks manly because she&#8217;s an amazon.  But as for global warming being fact, I ask you to first define global warming.  Do you mean that Earth naturally warms and cools and that we had been in a warming period but have now entered a cooling period? If thats what you mean, then you are correct.  However, if you mean that the Earth is getting warmer because of increased carbon dioxide and other green house gas output by mankind, then you are mistaken.</p>
<p>I think these scientists sum it up with their research far better then I can.<br />
<a href="http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm</a></p>
<p>But if thats not enough, then look at the difference between the readings from the ever dwindling, increasingly urban ground stations, to the satellite and weather ballon reaings, that can cover much more of the surface.  They show minimal to no increase in average temperature over the last few decades.</p>
<p>(Singer, S.  (1998).  Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming&#8217;s Unfinished Debate.  Oakland: The Independent Institute)</p>
<p>The arrogance in the idea that we can control the weather by any of our actions is astounding.  If you are an evolutionist you believe that the earth has existed for billions of years before man, and to think man can some how, it the blink of cosmic eye that we&#8217;ve been here can destroy the planet is laughable.  If you&#8217;re a Young Earth Creationist you believe that God is invariable in control and wouldn&#8217;t allow us to destroy the Earth before the Time of Judgement, as well as the fact that this kind of arrogance is what led to the Tower of Babel.</p>
<p>So really, no matter where you stand, you should see Man Made Global Warming for the bunk that it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
