Actors On Strike – Take Two!
by Dave KonigWith the ongoing struggle within SAG between the strike faction and the anti-strike faction, and with the upcoming commercial actor’s contract negotiations looming, it is time to address the big issue behind the union’s difficulties. No, it’s not the economy, new technology, or the explosion of reality television. Those are just messy details. The big picture reason why the Screen Actors Guild is a mess? It’s run by actors. Actors shouldn’t be running unions. Because actors are dumb. I know – I’ve been an actor all my life, I’ve been around actors all my life. Let’s face it – if life is one big SAT test, we actors are still in the hallway tying our shoes.
(Case in point: that last metaphor. What does that even mean? Just dumb.)
I’ve been through a few actors strikes over the years. I’ve been a card carrying member of SAG since 1975, having begun my show business career as an obnoxious young child actor (are their any other kind?).
By the way, for those of you thinking of pulling your adorable moppet off the Little League field and on to the big stage (or little screen), here’s a fun drinking game: take one shot of hard liquor for every child star (aside from Ron Howard) you can name that successfully made it to adulthood without a drug problem, arrest record, or failed teenage marriage (that last one eliminates Shirley Temple). It’s the only drinking game guaranteed to leave you cold stone sober (thus differentiating you from 99.9 percent of all former, and several current, child stars….
But, I digress. The last time I was involved with an actors strike was in 2000, when SAG struck against the producers of TV commercials. For a decent chunk of my career I made a decent chunk of my living saying things like “may cause oily discharge.” Though admittedly pithy, it’s not quite Shakespeare, but it pays the bills. Actors who sell floss and dish detergent, and super absorbent magic towels that can wash, dry, and polish any surface, easily remove cola, wine and pet stains, and is guaranteed to last ten years and will have you saying “wow” every time (God help me, I love that guy) have working condition and minimal salary requirements just like any other labor pool. So, despite the fact that actors are pursuing one of the most individual, least collective, professions on Earth, every three years collective bargaining is called for. Goals are pursued, compromises are made, deals are struck, all the individual contractors shake hands and go back to their individual pursuits.
Except in the year 2000. Fiery, strike-happy (mostly non-working) actors led the union (basically the same cats that are there today) and were determined to take the commercial actors out on strike. As part of the anti-strike faction in New York, a group of us met with the union leadership (then president William Daniels and others) to try and avert the strike. The SAG leadership listened carefully to our well-reasoned arguments, considered our point of view thoughtfully – and then took the union out on strike for half a year.
Despite the fact that I was vehemently against the strike, I felt it was the patriotic thing to do to support the strike once it began in the hopes of ending it quickly (see first paragraph re: me dumb). I was a “strike captain,” so I have the experience and knowledge to give readers some expert analysis of what can be expected should SAG go on strike again
First of all, actors can be pretty tough. Now, you wouldn’t think commercial spokesmen would be tough strikers like pipe fitters and iron workers, but things got a little hairy. There was the day the Pillsbury Dough Boy tried to cross the picket line. The Pep Boys beat the crap out of him. There was yeast everywhere.
One day on the line we got into a shoving match with the cops. It all happened so quickly, I don’t really know how it went down, but Mrs. Butterworth got cracked over the head with a billy club. The streets flowed with syrup that day, my friend.
Of course, strikes can be romantic, even passionate, and actors are passionate people. We had our share of “strike romances.” Everyone knew the Michelin Man was going around with Aunt Jemima. Of course, in the industry the Michelin Man has always been known as a “player” – guy carries rubbers with him wherever he goes (the kind with “all weather tread” – you know, “for her pleasure”). Naturally, with Aunt Jemima all caught up in strike frenzy and running around like that, Uncle Ben was heartbroken. We all told him: you got a woman as fine as Aunt Jemima you got to keep her bottled up, or else she’ll spread her sweet stuff all over town.
As the weeks turned into months a lot of the commercial spokesmen couldn’t take the stress. The Snuggle Fabric Softener Teddy Bear started hitting the bottle. You know, the kind with the “easy pour spout.” He stopped caring, started mixing in his colors with his whites. His clothes were no longer soft and supple like a baby’s bottom. They were coarse and rough like an old man’s ass! Yes, it was sad…
Well, I hope these memories of the last big actors strike helped to give you some insight into the issues. Once the strike was finally over, most of the non-working actors who had pushed heavily for the strike went back to not working. Unfortunately, a good deal of the working actors ended up joining them on the unemployment lines. Six months is a long time. Plenty of time for producers to figure out how to make commercials with non-union actors, or in Canada, or how to make commercials without actors at all – or how to stop making commercials because all the technology changed and no one watches commercials anymore anyway.
Dumb.
My dad was an immigrant house painter (or, as he described it, “a shmearer”) with virtually no formal education. He was a tough Jew – from the streets. Once every few years the painters union would go out on strike and my dad would have to walk a picket line. He was at a strike meeting once and some big slob of a house painter took the seat my dad had saved for my mom. “My wife is sitting there,” my dad said. “Not anymore she ain’t,” the guy said. So my dad – who was five foot two and one hundred twenty five pounds – picked the slob up and decked him, cold. The president of the painter’s union witnessed this disorderly event – and promptly hired my dad to be his personal bodyguard. Years later, long after my dad had ceased being his bodyguard, the president of the painters union was gunned down in a labor dispute with some representatives of the Gambinos. Now that’s a strike authorization!
So, this time if the Screen Actors Guild goes out on strike I won’t be a strike captain, I won’t be out on the streets playing “Norma Rae” with the rest of the kids. I will be concentrating all my efforts towards making a buck, focusing on supporting the DKG: the Dave Konig Guild (six active members: me, the Bride of Konig, the four Spawn of Konig). Maybe I’ll follow in my father’s footsteps and I’ll show up for a strike meeting or two at the union hall. Unlike my dad, however, I’ll be sitting in the back making wisecracks not sitting in the front throwing punches, and if any big, mean actors want to take my wife’s seat… they’re welcome to it. And no offense to the president of SAG, but the Konig family has long since retired from the personal-bodyguard-to-union-presidents game.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
81 Comments
Fred Savage, Malcolm Jamal Warner, Kirk Cameron, Kirsten Dunst. Off the top of my head, also add Sean Astin, Jessica Alba, Hilary Duff and Natalie Portman. But if I've messed up details of their lives, don't blame me, I'm drunk after the first 3 shots.
Yeah, actors are dumb, and SAG presidents are the worst of all of them. Didn't we learn that 80-88?
I remember the strike in 2000 or thereabouts. I remember Jason Alexander being on Leno (I think) and saying something about his commitment to SAG and how it wasn't for the rich stars like him but the people struggling to get by on $75K a year. The host, Leno (?) kinda mutters that that is actually a pretty good salary. LOL! Perfect.
DK, re:"Vince" from 'Shamwow!', don't know why either, but he carcks me up. My favorite pitchman since "Crazy Eddie" "his prices are in-saaaaaaaaane!"
Dave,
Nobody wants a strike, however there are times when they are necessary. I would suggest you and others who wish to 'rag on the Guild' go back and study a little history. The sacrifices that were made by those who came long before you and I ( SAG/1978) ever came on the scene is worthy of my respect. Without those brave men and women who walked picket lines, there would be no residuals or a pension and health plan just to name a few things.
http://www.sag.org/node/22
As for the Commercial Strike of 2000, it wasn't pretty, I'll give you that and I'm not interested in rehashing it at this time. What is important to remember is that Class A Residuals were not lost and there were substantial gains in residuals for cable use.
Continued…
Like you, I have a family. A wife and three kids. I've felt very fortunate and grateful to earn my living as an actor over the years. I've paid my dues. As I recently began collecting my pension in August of 2008, I understand the importance of issues facing actors today. The Internet is the future. Actors, as writers, and directors, should be able to prosper from the fruits of their labor and it is here where the battle lies. Again, look at your history. Anything worth having is worth fighting for. Is this the right time and place? Probably not.
What will happen with the current situation, I don't know. I pray there is a resolution, not a strike. However, I can tell you this much, if there is one, I will never cross a picket line. You want to sit in the back row of the union hall making wisecracks, go for it. That's the beauty of our country. Take care.
Impressive recall there. I'll add Margaret O'Brien. Still, though, that's a small percentage compared with every child star throughout American history.
Ya' know, I would almost believe you about unions, but you aren't exactly coal miners now are you?
Boy would it be great if SAG went on strike. I'd love to hear someone ask Matt Damon why he doesn't feel adequately compensated. Of course, that's the main reason it won't happen. A strike now wouldn't be helpful to the Leftist cause so I guess all those struggling young ones can go eff themselves. There's a revolution at stake.
He makes me happy. He has an amazing ability to soft sell the hard sell. He is my new self-help guru. I think that if I could be more like the Sham Wow guy I'd be a happier person!
Hours in makeup to get the look "just right" is a living HELL! Ask Chubakka, or Rosie O'Donnell…
Hey he's pimping that slam dicer thingy now…powerful, powerful performance…award winning, really.
Down with closed shops! There is a market for labor, just like any other scarce resource. Unions are a conspiracy against the market, nothing more. I will never give them my respect.
Please, go out on strike. Do it. Go out today. See how much support you'll get from the public.
No Bev, actors aren't coal miners. However, it is a noble profession and I'm proud to be a member of Screen Actors Guild. Even prouder, to be a conservative actor to boot, but don't let that stop ya for taking a swing at me.
I do not have a dog in this fight as I am not an actor or involved in anyway in the entertainment industry except as a consumer. I know there are a lot of issues that are important to those of you that support yourselves and your families. I just want to say one thing. It is STUPID to call for a strike when the rest of the country is going through tough economic times. You will lose whatever sympathy you might have been able to garner from the public by doing so. There are a lot of people having to take paycuts and reductions in benifits so that the company they work for can survive. This is not an attack on Unions as there are plenty examples of workers being abused. There are an equal number of examples of Unions abusing thier own members as well.
During times like these it is important to save the very factory you work in because that factory can easily be re-located. People will still buy what the Entertainment Factory Produces, where ever it comes from. The public does not know or care if it comes from a Union or a Non Union Shop.
Robbie Rist….a friend and one of the coolest cats I know.
Why? Because his parents had his back. They weren't crazy stage parents. He has some great stories
I dunno. When I was a teacher, the NEA only ever did two things for me: take money out of my paycheck every month and call at election time to tell me who to vote for.
Don't get me wrong, having been a member of AEA for a number of year (lapsed now), I think acting is a noble profession. But to make yourselves out as the poor hapless victims of Evil Corporate OverLords seems a bit antiquated.
No, it wouldn't be great.
Matt Damon, Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and all the A List talent in the Guild won't be hurt in by a strike…just the rank and file, meat and potato, guys and dolls, like me. Not to mention all the hard working folks on the other side of the camera. As I mentioned in my original comment to Dave, nobody wants a strike, especially not today but there are valid issues on the table to be addressed which may mean the difference between actors being able to make a living at their chosen profession or it being a hobby.
Yeah the "slap-chop" "you're gonna love my nuts" I watch to much TV. With Vince, it's like he's in the middle of a poker game and tells his buddies "No.. deal me in the next hand, I just gotta say something to this guy." And then it's "See this?, you love it right? Listen I gotta go." "…we can't do this all day…" And yeah, he makes me happy too. Easily pleased, me.
Do you see me ANYWHERE advocating going on strike? All I'm doing is responding to today's post by Dave and trying to present my point of view on the issue along with educating a person or two along the way as to some history of the Screen Actors Guild.
From your reply, you seem kinda pissed. Is it just me or do you detest all actors?
Evil Corporate OverLords?
Sorry, I don't think that's who and what the beef is with or about.
So this fight is NOT about money then?
Leo Bloom: Actors are not animals! They're human beings!
Max Bialystock: They are? Have you ever eaten with one?
– The Producers
Oh sure money is involved, I believe it's a question how talent will be compensated in the future as a result of New Media and the InterNet. A discussion of which we can have all day however, I have a lovely woman (my wife) standing over my shoulder waiting for me to take her out to lunch and that is where I'm now going. Have a nice day.
Are you getting this, camera guy?
Chubakka or Rosie O'Donnell is redundant.
Look SAG has always had it's factions — but the beginning of its soon to be end was when the merger failed thanks to d-bags like Ed Asner! Not that the commercial contract wouldn't still be fought for, but they lost a lot of power when it all broke down.
My favorite movie
I still think a manatee is closer in resemblence – Hillary is chewbacca – IMO
I have to admit, the demonstration is compelling…
True, my error. Chubakka is much more photogenic though…Rosie requires some crepe filtering, lighting adjustments…a chair, a whip, and a .45 pistol.
Hello? Jodie Foster?
I can see that. This reminds me of the Napster issue. I would have been plenty pissed if some yahoo invented some software enabling college kids world wide to steal copy written material. That turned out fairly, I guess, you'all should be fairly and adequately protected. Watch for (Red) China and the copyright theives operating there to be a bigger and bigger problem.
You might be on to something here. With the sucess of "Slumdog" will more and more Bolly be chasing the same or diminishing Holly dollars? It could happen, and I'm not advocating embargos, let the best product win. That's why it saddens and amuses me to see an ever increasing volume of pure crap that is being churrned out of Hollywood these days. Certainly there is still a high level of work being done, but message wise, some of it leaves me cold. Like has been discussed, don't preach to me Hollywood, entertain me. I'm in, just make the damn movies and leave the politicking to the pollitical hacks. They I don't need, my movies and t.v., dang it, don't mess with that!
OOO! I KNEW I forgot an obvious one! And I suppose Christina Applegate and Brooke Shields…
Have no fear.
If SAG strikes, the producers will make them the air traffic controllers of the 21st century.
Followed by the 10-15% of SAG that actually works breaking off, forming a new guild composed solely of actual working actors, leaving the perenially unemployed malcontents in the dust, and signing an agreement with the producers in short order.
(And anyone from SAG should note well that after the WGA went on strike, every time they came back to talk, the producers started yanking things *off* the table, and they eventually got a worse deal than if they'd just signed the final offer.)
Good luck demanding compensation for illusory revenue streams for "new media". Doing it in an economy hovering on the brink of Depression is chutzpah like nobody's business.
Pay no mind to the fact that you're keeping 200,000 other people out of work with your petty rantings and self-important twaddle, and crippling the local economy to the tune of billons of dollars evaporated like a government bank bailout.
Thanks for the article, Mr.Konig.
Dave Konig's most controversial post yet! Not only did he call actors "dumb", but he broached the subject of the taboo interracial relationship between The Michelin Man and Aunt Jemima.
Here is some trivia for you– name the child actor who went on to become president of SAG-
"Followed by the 10-15% of SAG that actually works breaking off, forming a new guild composed solely of actual working actors, leaving the perenially unemployed malcontents in the dust, and signing an agreement with the producers in short order"
In your dreams…
"Good luck demanding compensation for illusory revenue streams for "new media".
You mean like this? http://www.hulu.com
I agree, thanks for the article, Mr. Konig
Looks like everyone missed the first two I thought of…Rick Shroder and Fairuza Balk.
Good one! Gotta add Anna Paquin, too, I suppose.
Melissa Gilbert
Laura Ingalls..two terms..
Which one was the good one?
Oh- you guys are right. That wasn't the one I was thinking of. OK- now name two more!
Err…I was praising the perspicasity of your comment as a whole, not the sum of its' parts!
Patty Duke
I'm sorry; I'm just flying off the handle. Three months of unemployment, so far, and I get a bit a hair trigger when it comes to things like actors strikes.
I do hate a lot of actors, though, and that's based on my personal experiences working with and amongst them. You claim to be a conservative actor, so
I'm not going to get into a whole diatribe here about the reasons SAG is in the position it is. The political BS that's happening is outrageous and resembles the national stage as anything else.
I will say that there are legitimate issues we are fighting for. Among them, as was stated, is the right to be compensated fairly for the use of our work. Our image or likeness, our voice, our talents.
The AMPTP, i.e. the organization that represents the producers, actually – the conglomorates that run the entertainment exhibition business, want to do away with all unions. The writers, directors, and the crafts are looking down the same barrel.
The powers that be want to return this business to the way it was run in the early days. When the workers had little say in the number of hours they worked, when they could take breaks, the right to safe working conditions and a fair wage for doing professional work.
They are in a strong position to get that done because of the change afoot in the distribution methods. And that's the biggest sticking point for us actors. Having the "new media" being recognized the same as old media. But not "the same", there are concessions being made.
Digital delivery is right around the corner. It just isn't being touted yet because, guess who controls that kind of good news? The congloms. And they don't want it known exactly how much money is able to be made when they don't have to meet their obligations.
Residuals for TV shows were introduced not that long ago. And there are many actors who don't get paid even though the studios are reaping banks full of money from work the actors did on shows now constantly in reruns.
They're looking to do away with many costs for a lot of original content on the internet. They want non-payment for the use of current TV shows for 17 or 24 days when replayed on the internet, and then pay only pennies for residual use of those shows.
So while it's an economic hard time for everyone right now, it is literally the future of our livlihoods, our professional way of life. If your bosses told you non-actors that you could keep your job, but now they wanted you to work from home because you had your internet connection, and your salary was going to cut by 50%, I don't think you would take it sitting down.
If we don't stand up now and make a claim for what's fair and right, we will be behind the eight ball during the next negotiations. We don't want to strike, but the producers are giving us little reason to choose otherwise.
Actors going on strike always makes me laugh. They are the first to condemn CEO's for huge payouts, but make millions off movies and TV shows no matter how bad the box-office take or ratings are. Hollywood=the epitome of hypocritical.
This is the most unintentionally funny comment ever. "the difference between actors being able to make a living at their chosen profession or it being a hobby"
Hey, can I get paid to pretend other people? I'll take scale to do that!
Hey, an actor is a professional like a doctor or engineer, perhaps a physicist. You get the connection, right? BTW-Strike or no, it is OK with me. Costs me nothing.
Thanks for the honesty. Based on their radio commercials, I thought they were for truth, justice and the American way.
It is your legal right to go on strike. Also, you will get whatever consequences you get. Hey, you can do a TV movie later. Anyway it turns out, good luck. As the wise man once said, "Choose carefully!"
BTW_ for most actors, going on strike doesn't look that different than "working." As I understand it, there is a lot of down time in that "profession."
Watch and see.
Did the writers really accomplish anything from their strike, other than completely screwing up Heroes and 24?
Waitaminute.
Did you try to sneak it through that actors have a "professional way of life"???
Getting paid does not equal "professional".
Acting is a craft. Not a profession. (Unless you were percahnce refering to the "oldest" one.) You could look it up.
And sorry, but the tens of thousands of people who don't get compensated whatsoever beyond their days' pay in this industry aren't going top come rallying around the SAG flag just because someone says
"The writers, directors, and the crafts are looking down the same barrel."
And the producers aren't asking you to work 20-hour shifts in a coal mine.
And after the WGA strike, most writers with any common sense tiptoe on and off sets, lest a large heavy item drop on them from the catwalk, or a Teamster-driven truck run them over.
There's a lesson or two in there for SAG.
It comes down to "Shut up and sign a contract, and negotiate harder in 3 years."
You mean pretend *to be* other people? Because from your smug reply, that's all it is actors do. We pretend. It's a game. It's joke. It's not like we're coal miners as BevfromNYC stated. We're actors and as such don't deserve respect for work we do in spite of the odds we're up against almost on a daily basis.
I'm curious, are there any actors out there whose work you enjoy? Anyone you respect like maybe Gary Sinise or how about Gary Graham who posts here often? Maybe one of my personal favorites, Ron Silver, do you know him? Or maybe some of the old school guys…Cagney? Jimmy Stewart? Any of those names appeal to you? Are they jokes? Or could it just be they're decent people who have talent and dreams and worked hard and were rewarded for their efforts? Frankly, I don't know why I'm even bothering with you. Probably because I AM AN ACTOR and I'm not diggin' the tone. I've worked very hard over many years and have been extremely grateful to have been able to make my living and raise a family as a result. This is no joke to me. Especially, in this economy.
Continued…
There are valid issues in our contract which I hope will be resolved and *if* successful *may* mean the difference between an actor being able 'to make his living AS AN ACTOR or it being reduced to just a hobby' Again, there is a proud and noble history connected to the Screen Actors Guild, if you want to take a few minutes why not visit the site and educate yourself, it may help to enlighten you on a subject of
which you seem to be clueless.
Only if you say so.
Hey genius, why not put the keyboard away before you hurt yourself.
Isn't it possible that acting is a craft *and* a profession? A career in fact or are we all just a buncha whores?
Why not try to educate yourself? Study a little history before shooting your mouth off? I'll help you.
http://www.sag.org/node/22
As for the 'Shut up and sign a contract' crack…you know what you can do with that now, don't ya?
LoneWolf,
You know when you generalize like this it only makes you seem a bit shallow. Not all actors 'make millions' lots of us are just regular workin' stiffs. There is a misconception out there about actors, that much I'm learning from the comments on this post. Sadly.
You are aware that this site is called Big Hollywood and that there are many actors who post and comment here who are conservative (myself included) So why not cut us a little slack and save venom for Matt Damon and company?
Thanks.
I appreciate the response. If you were to read my comments from yesterday, you would be aware that I am in no way advocating a strike. I understand would be a disaster on many fronts at this time of which I will not get into here.
Maybe it's time to change 'the perception' as you stated. Clearly, there are a host of misconceptions about actors all over these few pages. I'm trying to change some of it in my own way, while trying to take the high road in the process. However, when some one makes a statement , as the commenter did right above, implying 'actors are whores'… My Italian Irish American blood begins to boil.
As for your statement about 'loving to do it, being happy to be paid for something that looks like so much fun' I *get it* But please understand this, most actors, at least not me, didn't choose this life to become rich and famous. I did it because it was my passion. And believe me, I thank God for being able to make a living and raise my family in the process.
One of the best days of my life, was when I got my SAG card in 1978. Never knowing it would be 10 years of *paying my dues* before steady work would come. It's a grind and a challenge at times but I love it.
I've always been a loyal member of Screen Actors Guild and am grateful to be a part of something with such a wonderful history of men and women.
Sorry for the rant. Hope it helps clarify a bit. Take care.
Not sure what's going on with comments today but this is a continuation of something I wrote to LoneWolf. Hopefully the first section will appear soon and it will make sense.
Yeah, but as a non Union member, I only have to pay taxes and can get raises, including cost of living raises, on a regular basis. I am not at the mercy of a third party deciding when and where I can work and for how much. I don't have a third party (except the Government) taking a cut out of my pay for essentially doing nothing for it. And if I am asked to work at home and take a 50% pay cut (which is not really an option for any actor that I know), I can deduct my home office from my taxes and save on travel/commuting and clothing costs, so I would probably come out ahead even with a 50% pay cut. Further to that, I can ask for a raise and additional benefits at any time and I am not limited to only a finite number of places that I can work.
If you can state concisely the standards of ethics to which actors adhere, and which state(s) license actors, I'll concede the point. If not…
Otherwise, suffice to say that not even that bastion of truth, Wikipedia, recognizes acting as a bona fide profession.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profession
But by all means, vote a contract down. SAG has nowhere to go now but out the door.
Just out of curiousity, did you work enough hours to make health benefits any time lately?
Perception is reality. Jimmy, I am glad you are a conservative. But if you were truly conservative you'd be against this strike. Personally I could never be part of a union, but I understand that there are good guy actors, even members of SAG, that realize how fortunate they are. Whether they are making millions or are "regular working stiffs". As I said before, I'd love to do it and I'd just be happy to be paid for something that looks like so much fun.
Yes. They completely screwed up every other TV show as well. Oh, and they got labeled as spoiled brats by most real working people of the country, something that seems to be lost on people in the professions of writing and acting.
I am just posting this to run up the number of comments to this column. Thank you.
You're probably right LoneWolf, however some of the comments made by the individual above definately rub me the wrong way. Interesting my reply to him was not published, probably for the best.
As for SAG, I know this, my health benefits paid for the hospital bills when my three kids were born, major knee surgery for me a few years back, great dental for my family, also my pension which I began collecting last August. Residuals and decent contracts which were hard fought for in the 50's and 60's by actors who came long before I arrived on the scene made that possible for which I am grateful.
I understand the importance of keeping my emotions in check however my experiences were very different from the experiences of Dave Konig during the Commercial Strike of 2000 and I was only attempting to share a different point of view with regards to actors today.
You're probably right LoneWolf, however some of the comments made by the individual above definately rub me the wrong way. Interesting my reply to him was not published, probably for the best.
As for SAG, I know this, my health benefits paid for the hospital bills when my three kids were born, major knee surgery for me a few years back, great dental for my family, also my pension which I began collecting last August. Residuals and decent contracts which were hard fought for in the 50's and 60's by actors who came long before I arrived on the scene made that possible for which I am grateful.
I understand the importance of keeping my emotions in check however my experiences were very different from the experiences of Dave Konig during the Commercial Strike of 2000 and I was only attempting to share a different point of view with regards to actors today.
LOL
You really shouldn't take any of this personally. I despise all unions equally. Whether it is the UAW, teamsters, etc. If I were to be in a profession that forced union membership I probably wouldn't stay in it, or I would opt out of the union if that option were given.
Still, acting is seen as a frivilous, overpaid profession. Most working people do not see it as real work. Don't feel bad, you are in good company with professional athletes, members of the media, and writers. Many in all of those fields work hard, but there are a few at the top that ruin the perception for everyone.
So don't be angry at those of us commenting, be angry at the Sean Penns and George cLooneys (sic) of the world. Those are the morons that should be getting your "Italian Irish American blood" to boil.
Acting is a profession like Barack Obama is a genius.
I posted the Wikipedia link, despite my general feeling that a free dictionary is worth what you pay for it, because it concisely lays out the commonly-held criteria for considering any occupation a bona fide profession.
Lacking the most serious ones, acting is no profession.
That doesn't mean some actors don't rise above that and demonstrate a professional attitude.
But a perusal of daily headlines indicates that's more the exception than the rule.
That tidbit aside, there's nothing dishonorable per se about the acting (or any other) craft, other than what the individual brings to it.
Which is entirely the problem where actors are concerned.
And for Jimmy: Seriously, if you think a strike is catastrophic, and your guild has failed to wring any substantial concessions after 8 months of few to no feature film production, then what's the point of continuing the farce any longer? When you're in a hole, stop digging.
Take what you've got, and take another, better crack next time around.
Perhaps when the entire nation's economy isn't in the toilet.
Annette Funicello
The fight with unions now a days is never about money it is always about control. I don't know SAG but having worked in magement at transportation company's I know teamsters and unions. They kill you with inane rules that are complicated, hard to follow just so they have an excuse to file grievances. The company can not make one single decision about the color of the bathrooms without talking to three separate lawyers from the union.
Maybe in the 30's the union guys were the salt of the earth working men the cliches make them out to be but today. Please. They are overpaid whiny control freaks with no sense whatsover that the company they work for needs to make a profit. Then they are perplexed when their jobs move to China. From my perspective I will admit I don't get it. I only had my GED and made six figures I would not complain. Not these guys.
You must be logged in to post a comment.