<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin: It’s Her Party And She’ll Resign If She Wants To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlistZ</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-1/#comment-552198</link>
		<dc:creator>AlistZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-552198</guid>
		<description>Tried reposting them, yes they are energy.     
 
I didn&#039;t say she was &quot;inferior&quot; in anything.  There is an obvious difference between the precision of her answers on energy versus other issues.  That does not equate with inferior. We have a Vice President who articulated the postion that Iraq should be split into three separate countries. That is inferior.  We have a President that has Zero foreign policy experience.  We have people passing 1000 page bills that have been unread.  That is inferior.     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried reposting them, yes they are energy.     </p>
<p>I didn&#039;t say she was &quot;inferior&quot; in anything.  There is an obvious difference between the precision of her answers on energy versus other issues.  That does not equate with inferior. We have a Vice President who articulated the postion that Iraq should be split into three separate countries. That is inferior.  We have a President that has Zero foreign policy experience.  We have people passing 1000 page bills that have been unread.  That is inferior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-2/#comment-550634</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-550634</guid>
		<description>Ah you got me there. What if I said last 25 years? Is that long enough ago to realise that since Reagan the Republican party does not resemble the party of the &#039;80&#039;s? BTW the actual size of govt increased under Reagan but he did pull off less deficit spending except if you count defense spending. But, that was a planned build up with a planned draw down which GHW Bush carried out. But then again Bush did break his no new taxes promise. See where I&#039;m going with this? There is NO decisive plan from either party to strictly cut spending and reduce the size of govt. It is a myth. Election year promises. Why would either party agree to that when lobbyists are paying them millions to spend our tax dollars? They have zero incentive to do otherwise. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah you got me there. What if I said last 25 years? Is that long enough ago to realise that since Reagan the Republican party does not resemble the party of the &#039;80&#039;s? BTW the actual size of govt increased under Reagan but he did pull off less deficit spending except if you count defense spending. But, that was a planned build up with a planned draw down which GHW Bush carried out. But then again Bush did break his no new taxes promise. See where I&#039;m going with this? There is NO decisive plan from either party to strictly cut spending and reduce the size of govt. It is a myth. Election year promises. Why would either party agree to that when lobbyists are paying them millions to spend our tax dollars? They have zero incentive to do otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CajunHighlander</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-1/#comment-550082</link>
		<dc:creator>CajunHighlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-550082</guid>
		<description>Bravo Bryan with the William F. Buckley line.  I agree wholeheartedly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Bryan with the William F. Buckley line.  I agree wholeheartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CajunHighlander</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-1/#comment-550042</link>
		<dc:creator>CajunHighlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-550042</guid>
		<description>What he said.  Mark_S, exactly what I was thinking.  Palin has a record of living her values as opposed to BHO voting present countless times and changing his positions with the political winds.  She is the REAL THING.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What he said.  Mark_S, exactly what I was thinking.  Palin has a record of living her values as opposed to BHO voting present countless times and changing his positions with the political winds.  She is the REAL THING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin: Still the Piñata of the MSM&#8217;s Biased Coverage &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-2/#comment-549958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin: Still the Piñata of the MSM&#8217;s Biased Coverage &#171; Frugal Café Blog Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-549958</guid>
		<description>[...] Mocking Trig Palin Continues Little Miss Attila: Pray for Sarah Chris Stigall, Big Hollywood: Sarah Palin: It’s Her Party And She’ll Resign If She Wants To Hot Air: Video: Matalin thinks Palin is “brilliant” for resigning and Audio: Did Palin hint at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mocking Trig Palin Continues Little Miss Attila: Pray for Sarah Chris Stigall, Big Hollywood: Sarah Palin: It’s Her Party And She’ll Resign If She Wants To Hot Air: Video: Matalin thinks Palin is “brilliant” for resigning and Audio: Did Palin hint at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noemdfan</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-/#comment-549610</link>
		<dc:creator>noemdfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-549610</guid>
		<description>And if he WERE Dennis Kucinich, he wouldn&#039;t be sitting in the Oval Orfice (intended miss spelling and meaning) at this point in time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if he WERE Dennis Kucinich, he wouldn&#039;t be sitting in the Oval Orfice (intended miss spelling and meaning) at this point in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-2/#comment-547410</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-547410</guid>
		<description>&quot;She holds popularity,&quot; You got that right. And everyone, by now, should have come to realise that the POTUS race IS a popularity contest. Palin&#039;s main obstical will be the fickel American voter. Sure she is popular now, but in our 10 sec soundbite, read the first two sentence, move on to the next point society will she be popular ENOUGH in 2012? Also let us not forget the every-politician-is-crap-except-mine phenom. The Conservatives among you keep calling for vote them all out, but you should know that people will stubbornly vote for the person they like even if it will screw up the whole plan. So, there is the second question. Will the voters be mad enough to want REAL change? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;She holds popularity,&quot; You got that right. And everyone, by now, should have come to realise that the POTUS race IS a popularity contest. Palin&#39;s main obstical will be the fickel American voter. Sure she is popular now, but in our 10 sec soundbite, read the first two sentence, move on to the next point society will she be popular ENOUGH in 2012? Also let us not forget the every-politician-is-crap-except-mine phenom. The Conservatives among you keep calling for vote them all out, but you should know that people will stubbornly vote for the person they like even if it will screw up the whole plan. So, there is the second question. Will the voters be mad enough to want REAL change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrisD</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-1/#comment-546378</link>
		<dc:creator>CrisD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-546378</guid>
		<description>Nope, just the phony ($60k a year) overpriced ones. Have sunk a lot into three kids recently. Read those course catalogs! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, just the phony ($60k a year) overpriced ones. Have sunk a lot into three kids recently. Read those course catalogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgamerican</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-1/#comment-548474</link>
		<dc:creator>dgamerican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-548474</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all pretty simple, actually.  I listened to her resignation speech and don&#039;t remember that terminology being used, but I&#039;m not arrogant enough to say that I couldn&#039;t have missed something.  She had three main points, and they were very simple to understand.  They also made a great deal of sense.  She was being selfless and selfish all at once--protecting her family as well as her constituents.  The main thing that people seem to have a difficult time with is this--she is not a dishonest person.  That throws people for a loop.  Now, that doesn&#039;t mean that she&#039;s perfect either.  If she were, she wouldn&#039;t be human.  But I simply cannot get past the intense hatred and vitriol that you seem to have for this lady.  If you are truly a conservative, it just doesn&#039;t wash.  True conservatives, by and large, do not use the &quot;nasty stick&quot;, but rather have a stronger sense of dignity when relating to and referring to others. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s all pretty simple, actually.  I listened to her resignation speech and don&#039;t remember that terminology being used, but I&#039;m not arrogant enough to say that I couldn&#039;t have missed something.  She had three main points, and they were very simple to understand.  They also made a great deal of sense.  She was being selfless and selfish all at once&#8211;protecting her family as well as her constituents.  The main thing that people seem to have a difficult time with is this&#8211;she is not a dishonest person.  That throws people for a loop.  Now, that doesn&#039;t mean that she&#039;s perfect either.  If she were, she wouldn&#039;t be human.  But I simply cannot get past the intense hatred and vitriol that you seem to have for this lady.  If you are truly a conservative, it just doesn&#039;t wash.  True conservatives, by and large, do not use the &quot;nasty stick&quot;, but rather have a stronger sense of dignity when relating to and referring to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgamerican</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cstigall/2009/07/08/sarah-palin-it%e2%80%99s-her-party-and-she%e2%80%99ll-resign-if-she-wants-to/comment-page-2/#comment-548366</link>
		<dc:creator>dgamerican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=178418#comment-548366</guid>
		<description>Reagan.  Sans Democratic Congress, it can be done. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan.  Sans Democratic Congress, it can be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
