Wrath of Can.

2010, the year we make contact with the voting booth — Yes we Khan, yes we Khan, yes we Khhhaaaaaan!

I would rather have Khan as president than Can.

At least then, nobody would mess with us.

Teenage boys across America are eagerly awaiting the implementation of Palin family values across the USA.

DFTT

It's time to throw the Democrats out, on their CAN!

I like your drawing style. Very effective. I like how you drew Palin. You captured her good looks and intelligence. It's no wonder that the left is terrified of her.

I don't even know what The_Klute is trying to say.

That's what I get for not taking Troll in college.

LOL! Best laugh of the week. Happy Easter, and wishes for continued success!

They should know their limits, but like true trolls, they always go full retard.

Really Ken? I thought it was fairly obvious.

Audience? What are you a dancing clown?

I don't dumb it down for the yokels.

Chris Matthews would be doing the oiling so he could get that "tingle" down his "leg".

Chris "the leg" Matthews would do the front and Keithy poo Olbermann would do the back.

all we need to do is remember is that beloved leader has little experience, and demonstrates 2 dimensional thinking.

Everyone knows the pec oiling is Chris Matthews job! BTW, why can't we at least have interesting trolls? They are all rolled out of the same dough. At least when the semi-literate ones post, it is like solving a puzzle guessing what they are trying to say, and gives you something to do. *sigh*

Sarah Palin lecturing Obama on ethics, really got your finger on the pulse, eh, Chris.

yes he does!

This is a classic – you must want to be in the limo with the shave-chested obama, larry sinclair, doing the crack pipe, and each other! More power to you and just come out of the closet and propose to the magic negro – mr giggles!

Well, Khan would.

Implement? You´re projecting. Obama is the great social engineer, not Palin. Conservatives defend existing values, liberals "implement" new ones.

"Conservatives defend existing values, liberals "implement" new ones."

I wholeheartedly agree – I mean, Strom Thurmond was just defending existing values in 1948!

Not so fast. There was no conservative movement in the United States at that time. However, there had been a progressive movement for decades and it was at home in Thurmond´s party – the Democrats.

Anyway, let´s not change the subject. Your inane point was that Palin would somehow force her values on to people when a) her actual values are fairly mainstream if you discount the hateful smears and b) Obama is manifestly acting as a social engineer in the tradition of the authoritarians of the 1930s. No plausible GOP candidate would even dream of dictating to businesses and the states, politicizing the census, dividing the country through class warfare, piling up trillions of debt for little to no economic gain, bypassing Senate approval through the appointment of "czars", using illegal sources for campaign finance, showing general contempt for the country, its institutions and the constitution.

"No plausible GOP candidate would even dream of dictating to businesses and the states, politicizing the census, dividing the country through class warfare, piling up trillions of debt for little to no economic gain, bypassing Senate approval through the appointment of "czars", using illegal sources for campaign finance, showing general contempt for the country, its institutions and the constitution. "

The coma you were in for the last 8 years… restful?

Insulted? Grow up already. Joe Sixpacks and Hockey Moms are the mainstream. Unlike the average liberal, I don´t despise them and I don´t delude myself that the world must revolve around me. Like many people, I´m out of the mainstream by definition. That´s fine.

But so are you. You are the one equating constitutional originalism, family values and economic freedom with racism. You guys are obsessed with dividing the nation by race, class and gender, not conservatives. We are not using Orwellian speech codes, you are. Because you have to. If modern liberals were mainstream they would not have to lie about being socialists like Obama does. You don´t have to support Palin to see that she is not a radical, but Obama and Pelosi are. It takes intellectual honesty, though.

Still pining for Mussolini?

"You are the one equating constitutional originalism, family values and economic freedom with racism."

I am? Where? Pointing out the historical fact that Strom Thurmond was an evil scum***k and joined up with the conservative movement does not tar the entire conservative movement – it just establishes where people like Thurmond found a home. But you want it both ways – the Democratic party pre-Truman was a home for racists like Thurmond, but the Republican Party post-Truman was not at all a home for racists like Thurmond. One can except the GOP is both the Party of Lincoln and the Party of Thurmond, but one has to choose between which person is lionized.

"Still pining for Mussolini?"

No, actually. The facist movement is 180 from the modern progressive movement. But then again, I don't stare at the TV, wide-eyed and sweating waiting for the next Howard Beale-ism from Glenn Beck, so maybe I'm not getting the full story.

I don´t think you understand my worldview – you couldn´t care less – but you certainly have all the clichés at hand.

You brought up race, no one else did. I guess I could bring up Byrd and Ike and RFK and debate the role of the conservative movement in the GOP and that I don´t watch TV but what´s the point? You´ve turned out no different than a thousand other left-wing commenters: no matter which button I push, the output is always some variation of racistsexistbigot. You don´t know me but I know that much about you now and I heard it all before. You guys cannot defend your seizing of freedom and property, so you change the subject. I´m not playing.

You know what? Have fun paying off our soon to be doubled national debt.

I'd say that he/she/it is still in college and is infinately frustrated that they can't get laid. This leaves such lonely souls nothing better to do than troll blogs and parrot their professors.

Your real point is not that Palin is a less than ideal guardian of family values, constitutional originalism or free markets or economic freedom in general. You are against all these things. As are all progressives and most variants of fascism and communism.

But you don´t say so. You don´t like to talk about debt, about Obama dictating to businesses and undermining federalism, and all that. You like to point your finger. You evaded the issue of Obama moving control of the census to the White House. You bring up Bush, even though the last census was in 1999. The truth is, these are things you are FOR as long as your side gets to do them.

You are aware of it, are you?

Forgive me naivete, but no, I didn't think you were – Americans can debate without descending into a neo-Gettysburg.

The reason for the census grab is clear, the reason for "immigration reform" is clear, the reason for bailouts is clear. It's all about future elections, the dems want to make sure that THEY get the vote and by doing all of these things it's a sure deal that illegals are going to forever be voting democrat same way with business' who get the bailouts. As for the census, nothing like knowing who votes what, when and how.

Now that´s the mother of all non sequiturs. The presence of rich people in poor countries (Europe is a different case) means that economic freedom is unimportant? See, that´s exactly why "progressive" idiots shouldn´t run the country. No wonder you think Obama is smart.