‘Going the Distance’ Review: Good Clean Raunchy Fun
by Carl KozlowskiLong-distance relationships have always been a true test of love and fidelity for any couple attempting them, but at least in the modern age of cellphones and Skype and occasionally cheap air travel, it’s easier to keep the flame going from afar than at any other time in human history. Even so, the new romantic comedy “Going the Distance” delves into the complications involved between a couple who are forced to be as far away as possible in the USA: Erin (Drew Barrymore) lives in San Francisco, while Garrett (Justin Long) lives in New York City.
—–
The two have their meet-cute while vying for a spot on an old-school Centipede video game at an NYC bar, where Garrett has gone with his best buddies Box (Jason Sudeikis of “SNL”) and Dan (Charlie Day) to drink away his sorrows over his latest botched relationship. He literally just got dumped that night by the latest in a never-ending string of girlfriends for his usual lack of commitment, but he can’t help clicking instantly with Erin, and the two have what they think is just a bong-fueled one-night stand before she reveals the next morning that she’s only in NYC for six more weeks on a newspaper reporting internship.
They are too attracted to leave things as a one-time fling, but both are leery of a serious relationship due to the time constraint involved. So they agree to keep seeing each other for the next six weeks, but not to let it get too serious. Of course, they fall madly in love, and throw themselves into the herculean effort of making long-distance love work even when their lack of finances often gets in the way of even being able to visit each other.
Add in the profanely witty and very opinionated friends of Garrett, and the concerned sarcasm of Erin’s married older sister Corinne (Christina Applegate), and it seems everyone has a say in the couple’s success or failure. And it’s that clever yet often highly salacious commentary that forces Garrett and Erin to realize they have to stand or fall on whether what they have is true love.
It may sound like that’s the entire plot, but you’d be wrong on a couple of levels. First of all, since “Going” is a romantic comedy, it’s nearly impossible not to figure out the formula of how things unfold. What matters in a movie like this is whether you laugh at the lines, care about the characters and enjoy the actors’ chemistry, and on those levels, this movie is a winner.
Barrymore and Long are a famously on-again, off-again couple in real life who break up and make up enough to keep even the paparazzi confused. But their relationship onscreen, whether in humorously sexy hookups or heartfelt romantic moments, is clearly powered by the fireworks offscreen. And the film’s casting directors have chosen their supporting cast wisely, as Applegate, Sudeikis and especially Day all have plenty of moments to shine as well. Comedian Jim Gaffigan also pulls off some hilarious moments as Applegate’s husband.
The one weakness about the movie on a secular level is that there’s almost no other plot besides the romantic machinations of fighting to keep love alive. The movie leaps back and forth from coast to coast as they try to make it work, to a degree that some might find exasperating if they can’t immerse themselves in the rules of the romcom. But at the screening I attended, the film’s incredibly heavy yet realistic use of dirty banter between friends kept the audience rolling with laughter, so the plot limitations will likely be overridden by the film’s high laugh ratio. On that front, director Nanette Burstein (an Oscar-nominated documentary filmmmaker making her fiction-film debut) and writer Geoff LaTulippe (making his debut, period) should be proud.
On a moral level from a Christian perspective, however, the film has a couple of red flags, as the profanity is a constant presence throughout the film and there’s numerous joking descriptions of topics ranging from masturbation to phone sex and beyond. It may sound crazy as a Christian critic to say this, but in the context of the movie’s plotting and tone and the fact its characters are not intended to be moral paragons but just young, funny, secular-minded adults, the language issues rarely feel excessive because the overall tone of the film is truly good-natured. There is also one quick but graphic sex scene that’s hilariously interrupted, and a few other discreet or implied sex scenes and an overall opinion that living together outside of marriage is a perfectly fine ideal.
What it comes down to is, if you like the films of Judd Apatow (“40 Year Old Virgin,” “Knocked Up”) – aka the sharpest R-rated romantic comedies going today – you’ll want to go the distance with this film. If you’re easily offended by raunchy dialogue, though, you’ll want to drive right past the theatre.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
17 Comments
"Going the Distance" is similar to Judd Apatow's movies? Thanks for the warning.
Truth be told, Drew Barrymore is the major reason why I don't want to see this. Her ditzy act is really getting old.
Another way of putting it is that she's too old to be that ditzy. She's in her mid-30's now. I think an actress can get away with that in her 20's, but has to mature to stay credible. Barrymore doesn't seem to mature.
I'm sorry. I'd rather be forced to use Macs for the rest of my life than see a Justin Long film. I don't get this guy's appeal.
"The two have their meet-cute while vying for a spot on an old-school Centipede video game at an NYC bar…
Wow. What memories. Back in the early 80's when I was at Berklee College of Music, there was a bar with a Centipede game across from the school. It's the only video game I ever conquered. I'd bring a roll of quarters, decimate all the mushrooms, and then I'd waste all the centipedes until I wanted to hand the game off and drink and smoke some more. lol. Good times.
I love romantic comedies by Apatow, and I've always had a crush on Drew, so I bet I dig this.
PC= Harley
Mac= BMW
Any questions?
Centipede was the only video game I ever played. Great times.
PC = professional engineer's platform. Mac = toy with training wheels. Any questions?
PC= Spirit crushing UI for boring functionaries.
Mac= What artists use.
Any Questions?
Ooh, playing the ahtiste card. No fair!
:<(
By the way, professional engineering is not functionary work. Not like, say, "earned value management" or other beancounting exercises, o'er which we would be in agreement.
I am going to see it today. Thanks for the review. Maybe I am a low brow loser, but I enjoy Apatow movies. Very entertaining, funny and light. Frankly laughs are hard to come by these days. As for Drew playing the ditz – I say who the heck cares what persona she chooses for herself. It seems to work for her. Does not mean you have to do it. She has her own successful production company so I doubt she is stupid. When she starts wanting to force us all to be free spirited flower children I will balk.
For today I will enjoy the funny.
I'm just messing with you. There's nothing more ridiculous than serious Mac versus PC flame wars. Some people like and/or need PC's and others like and/or need Macs. Even Linux has it's own geeky contingent.
BTW: Autodesk just released AutoCAD for Mac OS X after it being PC-only for about twenty years. lol.
Every single time you hand your money over to the likes of Drew Barrymore and her ilk, you give her a bigger megaphone, a bigger platform, and more credibility.
No thanks!
Yep, me too just messin. Nice to know AutoCAD is finally there. I vaguely remember rumors about it years ago, or maybe just wishful thinking. I don't expect PTC to go there anytime soon, though if I remember rightly the last generation or two of MACS have had a chipset that supports Windoze, and a dual-boot is presumably done on those.
I've been toying with the idea of going linux, or at least setting up a linux machine. Haven't made time for it, though. I do like that independent thinking.
Um, i think i've never heard her talk politics other than her bizarre tear-besoaked meltdown on "Oprah" when she touted her own giving away a million dollars for an African childrens' cause. So where's the "platform" and all that you're complaining about? Just askin'. I'm around Hollywood and hear stars' claptrap all the time, she sticks to business as far as i can tell. And when she got to direct a movie with "Whip It" last year, she not only did a helluva job, she portrayed a functional family that was subtly but clearly Christian, in which the parents and main teen daughter character had disagreements but came to positive agreements and showed the devastating emotional effects that teen sex can have to boot.
So yeah i'll keep supporting her.
I just saw the movie. Only 4 people (me and my friend and another couple) in the theater. The first half of the film we laughed our butts off (2 women) so much so that the couple below was laughing at our snorting. It was a pretty cute movie and I loved his friends. I would go see it if you want a good chuckle. The last airport scene gave me the feeling that real life was at play between the two of them. Sad.
On the superficial level… L'Oreal either does amazing airbrushing on their ads or their makeup is something just short of miraculous because Drew looks so OLD. One scene the guys are cruising the older ladies(but not cougars~) and the women looked Drew's age. She plays a very rough looking 32. I said it was superficial! I warned. Meow. She is a good actress OK. LOL Yep. I am strange.
after Whip It! (which would have been done better in the hands of Tarantino) and this, let's just say her platform and megaphone are shrinking infinitely.
She talks politics all of the time. She was quite the Bush basher, and quite the Obama supporter.It is your choice to support her, and it is mine not to.
You must be logged in to post a comment.