‘Dances With Wolves’ In Space: Cameron’s ‘Avatar’ Gets Visuals Right, Everything Else Wrong
by Carl KozlowskiImagine the story of a soldier sent to fight native tribes for their land, but finds that once he actually meets and gets to know them, he respects them too much to follow through with his mission. Gradually he becomes one of the tribe, leaving his old way of life behind to embrace their nature-loving culture.
You might think you’ve just read the synopsis for Kevin Costner’s Oscar-winning classic “Dances With Wolves.” But it’s actually also the core plot of another Oscar-winning director’s new film: James Cameron’s “Avatar.”

The fact that “Avatar” is basically “Dances With Wolves in Space” represents the film’s major flaw. For despite being the most expensive film of all time, with a $300 million production cost and another estimated $200 million spent on advertising, “Avatar” is also one of the most derivative films of all time. It’s hard to believe that a man like Cameron (“Terminator 2,” “Titanic”), who is capable of absolute genius in creating the film’s staggering visuals and astonishing breakthroughs in 3D IMAX technology, is unable to come up with a screenplay that isn’t a hamfisted mishmash of countless better films’ plot elements and a heavy-handed bash on modern American foreign policy.
The film is set in 2154, with the earth environmentally ravaged and a governmental outfit called the Resources Development Administration spending mountains of money to mine the distant moon of Pandora for a rare-earth mineral essential to solving the earth’s energy crisis, called Unobtainium (nice subtlety, Cameron). The RDA has been trying for 30 years, but has faced growing conflict with the indigenous master race of the planet, called the Na’vi, and the two sides appear to be heading towards a brutal war over Pandora’s resources.
The RDA’s last-ditch attempt to avoid war and negotiate for the right to mine is the Avatar Program, which human scientists have created to build a “bridge of trust” with the Na’vi by employing genetically engineered avatar bodies to walk among these alien giants by resembling them. Basically, human participants in the Avatar Program – led by Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) and a former soldier named Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) – strap themselves into chambers that resemble tanning beds and enter a sleep-like trance in which their consciousness enters the form of alternate, or “avatar”, beings that resemble the Na’vi.
The goal is for these avatar forces to provide intelligence about how the Na’vi live and think over a three-month period, with the information intended to help the humans outwit them either in negotiations or on the battlefield. But major problems arise when Sully finds himself saved from certain death at the claws of a monstrous Pandoran creature by a beautiful Na’vi woman named Neytiri (Zoe Saldana).

As he’s learning about her life, he falls for both Neytiri and her culture, prompting him to beg his fellow humans to peacefully negotiate a deal with the Na’vi for their resources. But the leader of the RDA mercenary forces, Col. Miles Quattrich (Stephen Lang in a deliciously hammy performance that ranks with the all-time great movie bad guys), decides to skip the talking and take Pandora by force via the violent decimation of the moon’s two sacred trees. Forced to choose sides, Sully sticks with the Na’vi, leading to some of the most epic battle scenes ever committed to film.
Cameron knows how to dazzle visually, covering Pandora with a seemingly endless array of gorgeous vegetation and alternately beautiful and horrifying creatures. And when the time comes, he delivers battle scenes that drew jaw-dropping gasps and even applause from the audience at an advance screening.
But these terrific elements are ultimately dragged down by the fact that Cameron’s screenplay seems to be cobbled together with derivative elements of many other films, even aside from “Wolves.” There are two resurrection-style scenes that seem cribbed from Cameron’s own underrated 1989 film “The Abyss,” and when the RDA mercenaries come crashing in for their initial attack on the Na’vi, much of the assault appeared lifted from “Apocalypse Now.”
Add in the fact that the Na’vi simply appear to be blue-hued Native Americans with tails, and that their worship service to a god named Eywu (a name that resembles Yahweh when spoken in the film, in yet another unsubtle touch) seems like it could be set to Elton John’s “Circle of Life,” and the hokum factor adds up fast.
But worst of all is the fact that the RDA forces dress, look and act like US Marines, and their assaults play out like a greatest-hits collection of America’s worst military atrocities, from napalm-style bombings to driving the Na’vi away in a sequence that resembles depictions of the Native Americans’ Trail of Tears. Col. Quattrich resembles Donald Rumsfeld in both appearance and tone, particularly a ridiculously heavy-handed speech in which he tells his forces of the need for “pre-emptive war” to get what they want, and another character’s statement that the military assault will be “shock and awe.”
SPOILER ALERT: It all adds up to crossing a line that I’ve never experienced in a major American film: drawing the audience to cheer the brutal deaths of Americans who are clearly symbolizing the military. The RDA forces are shot, thrown off their planes, crushed by heavy objects and eaten by Pandora’s flying creatures, as their helicopters are brought crashing down in flames.
Which leads me to wonder who really wrote this overpriced pile of cliches and anti-Americanism – James Cameron or famed radical-left historian Howard Zinn? I’ve defended movies like “Brothers,” which some conservatives branded as anti-troop because it depicts the tragedy of post-traumatic stress disorder on the life of a US soldier and his family, but “Avatar” takes its message into almost outright hatred of our forces while hiding behind the slightest of smokescreens in its bare mention that they’re “mercenaries.”
Call a spade a spade, and call a uniformed fighting force composed entirely of Americans and led by a Colonel the military. Why couldn’t Cameron have left his agenda at home and crafted a non-political story in which Americans could be heroes, as they have been in countless situations anyone can agree on, even assuming Iraq is divisive? The curiosity factor will enable “Avatar” to open with monstrous numbers at the box office this weekend, but I’ve got a strong feeling that it will fail fast – or at least fall well-short of expectations for the director of the largest-grossing film of all time, “Titanic” – once the heartland and anyone else who has loved ones in the military finds their stomachs turned by the coal-black heart of this film.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
508 Comments
Another $9.25 I'll save so I can pay my soon to be inflated power bill.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fernando Colon, Big Tweeting. Big Tweeting said: BigHollywood: ‘Dances With Wolves’ In Space: Cameron’s ‘Avatar&#.. http://bit.ly/7DrUIv #BigTweet [...]
thanks for the tip! another piece of propaganda that i can choose to ignore.
I will not watch Avatar because Hollywood is the earth's #1 polluter; scientific consensus says that decay, disease and destitution around the world is created by Hollywood.
I will not contribute to their pollution.
Save the Planet, Kill Hollywood
…for all the hype, this movie has not succeeded in generating any interest in me at all.
I'm a Cameron fan but this will be all I say about the subject:
Cameron seems to be a walking contradiction. While Avatar seems to be exactly what we’re all expecting (and he can’t seem to get out from under the shadow of Vietnam and its allegories), in a New Yorker article that was recently published, he describes himself as such:
Cameron’s imagination was shaped by the Cold War; the threat of nuclear annihilation is a recurring theme. But he also admires the military and its accessories. “I suppose you could say I believe in peace through superior firepower,” he told me. “I don’t believe that the human race is going to suddenly evolve to the point that we can all join hands and sing ‘Kumbaya.’ ” He learned to shoot—shotguns, assault rifles, pistols—in the early eighties, when he was writing “The Terminator.” “I didn’t want to write like an idiot, based on some kind of comic-book knowledge,” he said. “I do a lot of things in the pursuit of creating a patina of reality in what is basically fantasy.” He has continued his education, training with a handgun expert on a course with pop-up targets, and spending a lot of time in the desert with his friends, shooting up watermelons and jalopies with an AK-47.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/26/091...
And on the Home Theater Forum, his longtime DVD producer had this to say in response to someone’s comments about The Abyss:
“I’m sure you know Jim Cameron has the utmost respect for the Military… one of his brothers was in the first Gulf War even as we were shooting T2.”
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/forum/thread/2746...
He even makes fun of Sigourney Weaver’s anti-gun views on the Aliens DVD commentary, stating “Another liberal bites the dust” after she learned to like working with weapons.
I realize that naturally leads to the question, "Well, if he's so pro-military, why would he have written this script?" and I can't answer that. Considering he originally wrote it (a treatment or first draft, I'm not sure) in the 90s before there was an Iraq War or 9/11 to talk about, it would be interesting to see at what point he started editing and making changes to reflect today's conflicts (and apparently, not for the better).
Just another liberal attempt to portray their screwed up mantra…."America bad…everyone else good!" Not to mention the fact that the plot simply shows no new creativity….just recycling (Al Bore should love this) of the same old storyline (also known by anyone with a brain as "crapola").
I for one will avoid this leftist muck and spend my conservative cash on something that is truly worthwhile….like a t-shirt that says "Obama Sucks". Now there is something you can show with pride.
Why would it surprise anyone that Cameron can't come up with an original story? His first hit, The Terminator, was cobbled together from Harlan Ellison's stories "Soldier" and "Demon With a Glass Hand" (IIRC) and Ellison successfully sued him, causing the words "Acknowledgment to the works of Harlan Ellison" to be appended to the credits of all the video releases. Avatar is not just a blatant rip-off of Dances With Wolves (or is it Dances With Smurfs?), but also the work of science-fiction writers Poul Anderson and Ursula K. LeGuin. I hope they sue.
That said, I confess I'll probably watch Avatar multiple times, as I have every other Cameron film. But it'll be for the visuals and the staging of the action sequences, not the brain-dead "story."
They dug up that old bag for another movie…give me a break!
You know what bothers me? How can this be a love story? The idea that a human dude can fall in love with an alien chick. How on earth could he be attracted to someone of a different species? It's stupid. For all the time, money, and effort that's been put into creating this thing, you'd think someone would have asked a few questions. Instead, they all said, "Yes, sir, Mr. Cameron. Whatever you want, Mr. Cameron."
This film sound so boring I can't even read the reviews.
"Col. Miles Quattrich…decides to skip the talking and take Pandora by force via the violent decimation of the moon’s two sacred trees"
Uh oh! Do I detect a possible 9/11 allegory here? As in, we're capable of great attrocities too/I have seen the enemy and he is us. That sort of thing?
I'm afraid I have to see it – the wife is a big sci-fi fan and doesn't care about politics. She was explaining to me yesterday about how you have to just lighten up, stop seeing "messages" in everything, and watch it for the special effects. In other words, I'll have to turn off my brain for the duration of the movie. No problem. Can do. I turn off my brain at work all the time. But then, I work for the Government…
Why doesnt anyone realize that these are Hindu gods disguised as natives?
http://www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/projects/...
Somewhat disappointed to read all this about Avatar and James Cameron. In the 1990s I read somewhere that Cameron was one fo the few prominent Republicans in Hollywood; obviously, Cameron himself has now "gone native".
Leave the poltical agenda at home?
That would mean that Mr. Cameron would had to do work. I guess it's easier to demonize than to write a real script.
Ugh, I might have considered seeing the movie IF it only had the "global warming" theme to it… But seeing something that symbolizes our military as downright evil and not honorable (which yes I know, there are some people in the military that are not… but they are few and far between in my opinion and experiences) is just not something I will be spending my money on or recommending to others.
**rimshot!**
Cameron has finally exceeded the excesses of George Lucas and has gone completely, utterly and totally insane from the visions in his head and the marketing pressure to make action figures. In my opinion.
If it is the sci-fi high your wife is seeking she'd have a better experience doing heroin than she would shooting up the Hollywood eye-candy.
The bonus part of doing Heroin over Hollywood is that heroin addicts look far healthier and have smarter brains than the Hollywood eye-candy addicts.
Niiiiiiice…….
I was at the Dallas-San Diego game at Cowboy Stadium on Sunday, when they did the 3-D disaster with the giant screen in the new stadium in the third quarter (everyone gets the glasses and then gets a headache trying to watch the 3-D screen and the play on the field; 90,000 people boo loudly when asked how they like Cowboy Vision in 3-D). The reason they did it was because of the tie-in to "Avatar" and the Imax and 3-D versions that will be out, but the relative point here was the three-minute commercial that ran in conjunction with the 3-D experiment.
The ad not only in some oddball way tried to tie the Cowboys into what "Avatar" was about, but attempted to completely fudge, if not reverse, the actual message of the movie. The military force used in the clips was portrayed in a positive light by linking it to the power aspects of the team (yeah, the way Dallas is playing "what power?" would be the obvious retort).
Anyone watching this and then going to see the film based on that is going to be shocked if they expect a positive portrayal of the military. Of course, this might have been fudged just because the people at Fox figured to actually play out the clips the way Cameron wants would have been self-defeating, or the folks who did the extended commerical may have deliberately wanted to associate football with a bunch of murderous soldiers as an in-joke and were fantasizing about some of the 90,000 fans in conservative Texas going to the movie and not getting what they were expecting to see.
Either way, they and the folks at Fox who paid Jerry Jones all that money for the ad and the 3-D gimmick clearly know there's a large part of the American audience out there that's not going to want to see "Avatar" if they're told exactly what it's real message is. What that probably means is a huge opening weekend box office, and then a major drop-off, especially in the Red States and in Red areas of the Purple and Blue States, after it becomes obvious the movie's only interesting for its behind-the-scenes technology.
Carl, that was a delightful review. You let me know that as a conservative, I am going to be beat over the head with liberal ideology. But you also said if you can stand it, the effects are cool. Now according to Rotten Tomatoes that is a fresh review (check out some of the reviews categorized as fresh on Avatar over there) but I call it useful!!
Apparently Bin Laden has been spending the last 8 years in his cave tapping out screenplays.
Re-hashed liberal gobblety-gook aside, I'm not even impressed with the one alleged redeeming feature, the special effects. Maybe it looks different on a 3D IMAX, but on my TV the special effects look like everything I've seen for the last 15 years.
I'm with badcraziness. The CGI just looks like another cartoon to me. Unless the IMAX 3-D version has something else going on, I have better things to do with 3 hours……
lol..I love the title of your article. Someone else called it "Dances with smurfs" somewhere. Fitting.
It figures that this would be one of these empty-headed Libtard tour de forces, and my Wife has become hooked by the commercials so I guess she'll be seeing itat least.
a couple of things…
A small nit to pick- Worthington is a former Marine- not a 'soldier'. Them's Army terms, buddy. Cameron has always been schizo- a Canadian and a former carpenter, he is not the typical weak kneed liberal. He is a leftist, but lives the life of an individualist. A feminist as well- his plot lines show that- but he is a cad, and an abusive one, too- ask Linda Hamilton.
Terrific innovator technically, but his film work is pretty much derivative hackery as has been pointed out elsewhere (accurately) in this post. In other words, he is basically a hypocrite.
Fits right in Hollywood, dontcha think?…
Yes, Cameron WENT THERE….
Osama Bin Laden's name should be in the credits.
Just wait 'til the Broadway musical version opens!
There'll need to be a new level of Hell for THAT sin against Mankind, let me tell you…
Cameron also stole from the Frank Herbert sci-fi book "The Jesus Incident", up to and including the name of the planet "Pandora".
I'm all for beating up on Cameron, but as for claims of abuse against Linda Hamilton….she is mentally ill (bi-polar), and admits it. Do not take her past statements as gospel truth.
Excellent analysis and references, thanks!
Dances with Smurfs.
Good one.
Shades of truthers?
It really would have been MUCH cooler to have a story where the military wasn't the bad guys and they worked with the aliens in order to get what they needed while providing the aliens with benefits. Conflict could arise from a misunderstanding or a rogue actor, then both sides overcome mistrust for greater benefit. Better story, better message.
Laziness is such a tragedy.
Add to that the infantile imaginings of technology. Transformers is a documentary when held against Avatar's "space flight is easy but copying the mining techniques of Earth 2009 neigh impossible" and that's merely the tip of the iceberg. Its pretty for certain but so are the cut-scenes from most of the games I see these days. For someone so obviously enamoured of technology, its hard to understand the outright stupidity of this presentation and his choices made.
You owe me a new keyboard…..
curiously that ALL came out after his settlement (big cash$$) with her. Yes, she is singing a different tune.
There are whispers of his callous treatment of others, women included. Our take: James Cameron is a class A jerk…
Sure but this time while Al-Qaeda has biological technology beyond anything we could possibly fathom, the most advanced chemistry set ever imagined and more than just the will to use it lethally, they choose to kick sand in the Thundercat's faces by knocking over their Minaret. Uh, OK.
The Na'vi are just not all that visually appealing, and the plot is repulsive. I will take a pass.
More like 'Fern Gully In Space'. Could have seen this coming from a mile away. What a crushing disappointment for such a great disappointment.
For such a great 'director'. LOL
From Roger Ebert:
"Watching "Avatar," I felt sort of the same as when I saw "Star Wars" in 1977. "
Gee, that's awesome, I thought reading that. I absolutely LOVED the original Star Wars. What a wonderful feeling it was to leave the theater after seeing Luke & Han blow up the Death Star and get their medals from the gorgeous Princess Leia. We need a fantasy like that again!
I read on…
"It has a flat-out Green and anti-war message. It is predestined to launch a cult. "
Uh oh.
See, I remember Star Wars as a story about good & evil in its most traditional form. It was an unabashedly sunny, feel-good, old fashioned throwback amidst the bleak pessimism of the 1970s. Is "Avatar" like that? I read on….
"The story, set in the year 2154, involves a mission by U. S. Armed Forces to an earth-sized moon in orbit around a massive star. This new world, Pandora, is a rich source of a mineral Earth desperately needs. Pandora represents not even a remote threat to Earth, but we nevertheless send in the military to attack and conquer them. Gung-ho Marines employ machine guns and pilot armored hover ships on bombing runs. You are free to find this an allegory about contemporary politics. Cameron obviously does."
Ah, just like Iraq and Afghanistan pose "not even a remote threat" to America? You're right Ebert! What a perfect allegory to contemporary politics. And clearly, American involvement in those wars is motivated by imperialism, oil, Haliburton, la de da….la dee da…
Did anyone feel this preached to when watching "Star Wars?" Not me. Does anyone feel like "Star Wars" was trying to shame us for being American? Just what I want out of my movie-going experience.
There will be no need to create a new level of Hell. An Avatar musical would BE the 10th circle.
Careful, there's a pile right next to your snare.. some Na'vi forget to bring a little baggie.
you can smell em comming.
If I were a billionaire, the Merry Prankster in me would produce a film about the Native American scouts who joined the US military in the Indian wars. Soldiers who joined the US forces because they either liked the prospect of working for the US or hated the other tribes so much that they gleefully joined with their enemies.
I'd wager that there were far more native scouts than there were settlers who adopted the way of the Indians.
Also, if our technology is sufficiently advanced to travel to another solar system, bio-engineer alien bodies, and project a person's psyche into another body … wouldn't it be possible to cure a damaged spine? Yet the hero of this movie is confined to a wheelchair.
It doesn't make much sense, but the same story element is found in Poul Anderson's 1957 novella "Call Me Joe" (voted one of the greatest SF stories of all time by the Science-Fiction Writers of America). The hero of "Call Me Joe" is a wheelchair-bound man who is sent to a space station orbiting Jupiter. There, he participates in experiments in which his psyche is beamed into the body of an artificially created life form that can survive on Jupiter's hostile surface. He gradually goes native and turns against the mission.
Cameron lost my respect when he proved himself an uneducated 'goof' when he co-produced that special with that numbskull "naked archaeologist" on the History Channel claiming they found the ossuary of Jesus and "his family." Of course the scholars mocked their conclusions but what was totally funny was Cameron's response to Christian outrage. He thought they would be happy if Jesus' bones were found!
Jimmy you didn't listen in CCD! Jesus rose bodily as well as spiritually!
Ebert needs to brush up on his astronomy, too. "An earth-sized moon in orbit around a massive star"?
I think Pandora is supposed to be a moon, but if so, it must be orbiting a planet, not a star. Right?
"It’s hard to believe that a man like Cameron … is unable to come up with a screenplay that isn’t a hamfisted mishmash of countless better films’ plot elements and a heavy-handed bash…"
Um, I'm sorry, but have you ever SEEN Titanic? It's every single melodramatic soap-opera cliché he could think of thrown into one mediocre movie. How could you possibly be surprised that he can't come up with a better story?
You know, if the na'vi village is sitting on this massive pile of 'unobtainium' it seems like the eville businessman could just buy mining rights and turn the na'vi from space native americans to space oil sheiks.Then you'd see big blue dudes rollin in their extra large escalades as they watch the humans mine their forest home.
But no … no… capitalism bad. Bad capitalism! Can't have anything like that.
It's not Sci-Fi, it's a western in space. Common, 150 years in the future, we are traveling intergalactically, yet we still use projectile weapons (take up space/mass) and helicopters? It's like doing a WWII movie with muskets and 12 pounders.
About as Sci-Fi as Star Wars.
You know Ebert hated Star Wars when he first saw it and all the critics panned it as space schlock. Probably because it wasn't preachy enough.
/sigh/
Dear Hollywood: You keep saying that you want to make good, edgy, groundbreaking, "original" films? Well, here's an original idea: Make a movie where the US military are the good guys. With the soldiers honorable, their leaders competent, and their opponents actually shown to be evil. Then release it to the theaters. I guarantee you, it'll be a blockbuster, because the vast majority of people who are turned off by your current drivel will go to see it.
Bonus points if the bad guys are liberal, eco-friendly socialists. But in Hollywood, that would actually require guts to do. Something which is in short, short supply.
The real problem is there is nothing new here but the CGI. The story is "Pocahontas" with aliens. I saw the previews when I was waiting to watch another film about vampires and I got the gist of the anti-Americanism right away. It was painfully obvious and terribly trite.
I imagine the screenplay was written some years ago when it was assumed that America would be left-leaning socialist country by the time the movie was released. A lot of money was bet on the assumptions that anti-Bush, anti-capitalism, anti-American exceptionalism attitudes would still prevail when the movie was finally released.
Those assumptions were wrong and as others have predicted, I believe this movie will do well initially out of curiosity about the CGI and effects, and tank thereafter when the patently offensive content becomes well-publicized.
Cameron used to make good movies then his ego got the best of him. The same thing has happened to too many talented individuals. Once they have success and a little power it just goes to thier heads and that is basically James Camerons downfall. I do not wish anyone ill but maybe it would actually do him some good if this movie tanks and becomes his "Ishtar".
Bestiality (or interspecies love) is the new frontier in Hollywood!
6 of 1, half a dozen of another.
You said, "…Cameron’s own underrated 1989 film “The Abyss,”…" Recently watched the Abyss again because of a recommendation seen here on Big Hollywood. Anyone who considers the Abyss a great film should not be at all surprised by a James Cameron anti-military screed. That movie starts off with peace loving, innocent aliens killing the entire crew of a U.S. Nuclear Submarine, follows with a team of Navy Seals led by a crazy team leader whose only desire is to detonate a nuke and ends with the peace loving aliens threatening global apocalypse if humans don't stop threatening each other. Maybe I'm a little more sensitive to this because my son is a midshipman at the U.S. Naval Academy, where only 25 out of a thousand are allowed to service select seals and where submarine officers are chosen from the academic elite, but I was deeply offended by the Abyss. The treatment of the deceased naval officers and crew was beyond the pale.
I say we nuke the Navi from orbit. It´s the only way to be sure, you know.
I guess his avatar has Navi hormones and plenty of them.
He had strong heroines in Aliens (though he didn´t invent that character), the Terminators and Titanic. But in The Abyss the female lead was introduced as "the queen b…h of the universe" and ended up begging her husband for forgiveness. And the Jamie Lee Curtis character in True Lies was treated badly.
he's just a weirdo, that's all. Everyone who knows him thinks him to be an odd duck. Very talented, and very flawed…
Interesting. Until news about this movie surfaced, I had no real beef with Cameron. I liked his Terminator movies and "Titanic" pretty well, but I didn't have much opinion of the man himself. I do remember being annoyed, though, by his search for the remains of Jesus a couple of years ago, which seemed to sum up his feelings about Christianity. This movie seems to have crossed into the region of liberals' darkest fantasies. I wasn't much interested in it even apart from the political messages, and now I definitely think I'll pass.
How dare you question the right of two beings (can't really call them persons) to love each other just because they're a different species! This is how nature made them and who are we to stand in the way of that and tell them no? Maybe you should stop getting hung up on a little thing like bestiality
I think what's bothered me more than anything about this movie is the fact that all the liberal sycophants in Hollywood are falling over each other to praise the movie, even if they've had absolutely nothing to do with it. For example, the Tonight Show has had any number of guests on the past two weeks (Ben Stiller, for example) who have acted more interested in plugging "Avatar" than their own crap. Could this be a genuine liking of the movie? Possibly. But after last year, I've become highly suspicious of such universal adulation.
Cameron has said before that he tries to put the theme of love in all of his films… mother/daughter in "Aliens", mother/son and adopted father/son in "Terminator 2".
So, he isn't really venturing into uncharted territory… but he might not pull it off the way he's done previously.
Even if American audiences don't warm to this film, the vast majority of profit for films comes from foreign dollar sales, and you know that everyone hates America, right?
How much of earth's natural resources did Cameron use to make this movie? Probably a lot more than is used by, let's say, the Bush ranch in Crawford for example.
I think that I can honestly say that the very last thing in the world that I want is techno-geek moralizing and sanctimonious posturing from the likes of James Cameron. I don't give a d__n how good the effects are, this hackneyed, trite and infantile storyline will cause me to forever shun this "epic." When I saw "Titanic" I was agog at the special-effects (( love a good ship sinking) but was pulling my hair out over the truly awful mega-cliche filled script. I never wanted two characters to die (and die quickly and horribly) as much as I wanted Kate Winslett and Leonardo diCaprio to get it in the neck. (No luck there.) Cameron's smug moral superiority was infuriating in "Titanic" so I expect it to be unbearable in "Avatar." HIs films are like a video game – All heartless technique devoid of humanity or real feeling.
Pandora's Litter-Box, of course.
Mean old lady. Git 'em with the vacuum cleaner.
To me, moon orbit planets and planets orbit stars. Stars can orbit each other.
If Pandora is earth-sized, why isn't it just called a planet?
I'll ask my husband the astrophysicist about it.
Ebert wanted to be Jabba.
Sounds like the plot holes are beginning to reveal themselves.
Probably more like a BIG baggie. They're 10 ft tall, remember?
They mostly come out at night. Mostly.
Remind you of the same impulse that got a certain someone a Nobel Prize nomination only one month in to his first term, does it? Hmmm?
You can imagine what Trey Parker and Matt Stone are going to do to this movie, right?
Game over, man!
At least you admit the visuals are great. Unlike some on this forum who need there eyes checked.
However I will be seeing it tommarrow and I hope your wrong about its message
I think I will pass. It would be fun to get together a group of ten or twenty, cheer the evil mercenaries and boo the Blue Tree Huggers. Might be fun to see if you could get kicked out of a movie for cheering for the 'wrong' side.
I've always made an effort not to let the personal politics, or imperfections of performers or film-makers affect my appreciation or patronage for their cinematic work. Artists have always been imperfect creatures like the rest of us; and some who lived despicable lives created timeless works of art.
But Cameron with "Avatar" makes his political biases the focus of his work. I hope it crashes big time, and causes studios to think twice before ever giving him the green light again. I will do my part by never patronizing any Cameron picture again.
As a sideline, I shall also inform any corporation such as McDonald's featuring "Avatar" promotional products that I will take my business elsewhere.
The more I hear about this movie the less I want to see it. When Big Hollywood first mentioned the possible anti-military themes earlier this year, I thought, "Well, it'll probably still be fun, I'll see it anyway". But after John Nolte's and now this review? Oh, Hell no will I be giving James Can'twin my money. We are acctually supposed to CHEER as American soldiers get ripped to shreds? Pox on you Cameron!
"breakthroughs in 3D IMAX technology"… no, Cameron in his IMAX documentaries shot HD and blown-up/converted to IMAX. Any breakthroughs were in 3D using HD/digital capture. His documentary films (and Avatar) would look a lot better if they were shot in IMAX.
It's common to misdirect your audience with flash/bang, gee-whiz effects in order to make up for a poor storyline. Just never figured someone would half a billion dollar to do it. Who was it that said "If you want to send a message, use Western Union"? Sam Goldwyn
From what I've heard, and read, Mr Cameron should have called his $300-$500 Million dollar movie……… "Dances with the Last of the Transmurficans" …….instead of Avatar.
Hey, Captain Kirk did it all the time, remember the green chick!
Yeah, but that green chick was HOT!
So from now on when our kids play with action figures it will be the guys in U.S. uniforms as the bad guys and non-existent life forms as the good guys. Why doesn't he just re-write ALIENS and call it ALIENS-REDUX. I mean, the cruel marines were just slaughtering the poor aliens that were just doing their natural thing……right? The Aliens were terribly treated by being put on that ship and selfish and bloodthirsty humans were begging for it by milking the planet for resources. But people don't have a problem with that because the aliens weren't cute blue cat-like creatures that just wanna love the planet. Turn the Na'vi into face sucking lizards and the whole plot changes.
South Park Treatment:
Instead of Na'vi, they'll be Canadians. They'll all look like Ike, and Terrance and Phillip. They'll be blue, because they're so cold. "Global Warming" is discovered to be a desperate Canadian plot to get warmer in the face of rising costs of energy. The Canadians fly around by strapping freon cans to themselves, using them like jet packs.
The US military is there to stop the GW because GW means no one will buy as much of the Greedy Oil Barons' oil. They want to steal all the freon and use it in a giant planetary refrigeration unit to freeze the planet and make the Canadians buy Greedy Oil Barons' oil for heat.
Hilarity ensues.
Ishtar for wogs…..
That's an interesting test. I'd love to see what happens. I can see it now, you're being dragged out of the theatre yelling "BUT GUYS, THEY'RE NOT EVEN REAL PEOPLE, THEY'RE CG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" LOL. That is sooooo typical of today's society. The tree huggers would stone you to death because you cheer the death of a race of creatures that don't even exist. LOL. It's like the line from pineapple express where the idiot stoned dude is saying "that would be like killing a unicorn ……………………with like a bomb" LOL
well written piece- and as much as i love these types of films- i have seen all of Cameron's previous films- i won't be seeing this one.
But it does, remember? The whole reason they go to Pandora is because the Earth has been trashed by us eviiiilllll war mongering humans.
Agreed, I've got a 62 " high def and even in 1080p the CG still looks like CG to me.
You must be logged in to post a comment.