‘Informant!’ Refreshingly Apolitical, Highly Entertaining
by Carl KozlowskiMark Whitacre had a boring job as a scientist and executive at Archer Daniels Midland, one of the world’s largest food-processing companies. Trapped in small-town Illinois hell with his wife and kids after previously living with them in the capitals of Europe, he still loved to drive fast cars and pursue as much luxury as his rural life could afford, all the while reading Michael Crichton and John Grisham novels that he believed were all too realistic in their depictions of corporate and governmental intrigue and malfeasance.
Stir all those factors together with his insider knowledge that ADM was colluding with overseas food companies in one of the planet’s biggest price-fixing schemes ever, and the fact that Whitacre became both one of the FBI’s best informants ever may not have seemed all that surprising. But the fact that he also hid a highly unstable tendency to lie or leak information as well also made him one of the Feds’ most nerve-wracking and unreliable head cases ever – and it’s this dichotomy that forms the center of director Steven Soderbergh’s head-spinning and comically offbeat take on the ADM scandal, “The Informant!”
Showcasing Matt Damon in a highly amusing turn as Whitacre, the film is an entertaining oddity because it tells the story of Whitacre and international conspiracy as a comedy, while its source book – investigative reporter Kurt Eichenwald’s 2000 book “The Informant” – is dead-serious in tone. In fact, Damon signed on for the role thinking that he was going to be delivering a dramatic performance, only to find later that Soderbergh (“Traffic,” “Erin Brockovich,” “Oceans 11, 12 and 13”) decided to start over from scratch and play off the ironies inherent in Whitacre’s double life.
The film’s supporting cast is also filled with rich surprises, headed by Joel McHale and Scott Bakula as the two main FBI agents working the case. The real revelations, though, are a string of new-school and traditionalist standup comics – ranging from Tom Papa to Patton Oswalt to Jimmy Brogan – playing a mix of the film’s funniest and most serious roles. It’s rare to see some of these comics act at all outside of their comedy-club sets, so the casting is odd and yet spot-on as everyone delivers with spot-on peformances.
While the film’s script by Scott Z. Burns (“The Bourne Ultimatum”) is only truly hilarious with the occasional throwaway line, the key to its highly amusing nature is the out-of-left-field, kitschy ’60s-lounge style score by old-school composer Marvin Hamlisch (“A Chorus Line”). The score’s jaunty undertones, mixed with occasional bursts of James Bond-style dramatics, provides the perfect undertone for Whitacre’s delusional mindset as he inflates his actually boring wiretapped meetings to the level of CIA-style excitement. In one of the film’s funniest lines, he shows a friend his elaborate and supposed-to-be-secret wiretap apparatus and says he’s known as “Agent 0014 – because I’m twice as smart as James Bond.”
In reality, however, Whitacre is seen as a doofus by almost all around him. Sometimes he’s aware of it, as is the case with the ADM executives whose lack of respect for his hard work pushes him to turn against them in the first place. Yet far too often, he’s too clueless for his and the government’s own good, creating an often-stunning series of betrayals and problems for everyone involved. The end result historically is that Whitacre was regarded as a national hero by the FBI agents on the case, yet was dirty enough himself in his side deals and lies that he himself wound up with a nine-year prison sentence for fraud – a fact the film glosses over.
With two of Hollywood’s most outspoken liberals at the wheel – Soderbergh’s most recent prior film was “Che,” an epic four-hour biopic of Communist rebel Che Guevara, while Damon’s dream project is to produce a TV miniseries based on radical historian Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” – one might expect “The Informant!” to be an anti-capitalist screed. Yet the film refreshingly refrains from taking an overtly political stand, instead choosing to make what could have been a dry polemic highly entertaining.






Subscribe via RSS
54 Comments
I will look forward to seeing this once it gets to cable. I refuse to supplement Mr Damon's already fat wallet, along with most other fat hollywood wallets. The movie, if it in indeed as good as you say, will still be entertaining in a year or so and I won't feel as if I have contributed to the morass that is Hollywood "talent" But, thanks for a good review!
Matt Damon and Steven Soderbergh??? I think I will pass. They both make me sick in an environmentally hazardous way. The real dufus' are those conservatives that support these liberal scumbags by seeing their movies. You need to draw a line. A little entertainment is just not worth the price.
I don't care if it's the second coming of the great almighty… Damon won't get a frickin' dime of my entertainment dollar.
Thanks for the review, Carl. Glad to hear that this one is apolitical. But that hardly makes up for all the rest. I've got better things to do with my time and my $12.50 than give any of it to these idiots.
Thanks Carl, I was really afraid this was going to be a corporate hatchet job of a film.
I'll see it on Netflix. Unlike the prevailing opinion here, I've really got nothing against the movies of Matt Damon. His politics, yes, but I find his stuff entertaining.
Okay, now I know what to make someone else pay for if I get asked out on a date in the very near future. :p
*MissQuinn*
[...] original here: ‘Informant!’ Refreshingly Apolitical, Highly Entertaining By admin | category: Script??????? | tags: archer, archer-daniels, daniels, europe, [...]
Matt Damon is a hack. There, I said it, lefties. Does that make me racist against white people?
HA HA! You're not empowered at all, are you sweet cheeks? Way to show the damn feminists that women can be happy in traditional gender roles!
You realize your cable company pays to get the right to movies, right? And your subscription pays for those rights. So you're still kinda paying for it. Unless you're stealing your cable, which is totally cool.
I think supporting Matt Damon by watching his movies is a bad idea. Some other lefty Hollywood actors are fairly benign but Matt Damon is using his power and money in a subversive way. He is making a movie about a Howard Zinn book "A People's History of the United States". This book clearly maligns and misinterprets American History. Matt Damon, the rube, is just another tool for the left to get their claws into more naive people. In my opinion, supporting Matt Damon financially is, in a way, supporting the extreme lefts liberal cause.
No way. If enough of us stopped supporting R-rated garbage, they would clean up the movies. Won't even rent it.
Great idea! I need to try to get a date with a liberal man and have him pay for the movie. May have to drink a little more to actually get through the date………
Bring the pepper spray. Liberal men tend to take liberties, especially if the lady has been drinking!
"People's" is code for "Communist".
Humor was never your strong suit was it? And here I was, once thinking that men had a better grasp on humor than women did.
But, at least you have the patronizing part down. GFY!
*MissQuinn*
I found a very different take over at Pajamas Media:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-informant-soderb...
Soderberg is a terrible filmmaker, really. You can trust the name — to produce absolute dreck.
In a way, this is like Oliver Stone's "World Trade Center", in that the director and star seem to realize that the only way to maintain their standing in Hollywood is to at least try and do a film once in a while that might appeal to a broader audience … which then extends the shelf life by which they can finance, direct or star in the movies they really want to make (you'd like to hope that's too cynical a view, and after Damon and Soderbergh's recent ideologically liberal bombs have taught them a lesson, but I'll still bet on them having the self control to keep ideology out of this one only because the money is finally talking loud enough).
I know I do!
I loved the book, which I found extremely funny in its own dark way, largely because the author develops the story so that in the beginning the book's image of Whitacre matches the man's image of himself. From there, the reader worries that maybe Whtacre is getting a bit too emotionally invested in being a mole. It all help makes the chapter in which the FBI learns their star witness is, in fact, an eminently impeachable scoundrel a delightful read. The FBI agents were so consumed with earning their own career feathers they forget that old saw that if somebody seems too good to be true…. There really are no words suitable to defining the boundaries of Whitacre's stupidity other than to say be prepared to ROTFLYAO when you learn what he had done to get convicted of fraud.
Here's hoping you find a good case of scabies with your next conquest…
Call Obama at 202-456-1414, for your treatment options…
You'll have to turn your friend in, though…"throw him under the bus", as it were…
And that's why I have to wonder why everyone here laughs about how the anti-American films that the leftists in Hollywierd put out in the last few years tanked. They're still coming on cable, and they're still inflicted on the American public, whether they want to see them or not. And if you're paying for cable, you're putting money into these reprehensible creatures' pockets, whether you watch them or not, if you subcribe to a cable channel that has them in their lineup. I wish there were ways to avoid them or ways of not putting money into these leftie asshats' pockets, but it's like they're the H1N1 virus and nobody's sneezing the correct way into their elbow joints.
"..[he was] dirty enough himself in his side deals and lies that he himself wound up with a nine-year prison sentence for fraud – a fact the film glosses over."
This is one of my problems with "true stories." They aren't. I'm tired of THAT fraud.
As for Soderbergh and Damon? One is bad enough, together it's a peristalic reaction for me.
I hope it go's to Tv real fast so I can watch it. If Damon wasn't a commie punk I'd watch it at the Cineplex .
the good news is that the worst STD is still curable if you catch it in the first 3 months. I just wish the government subsidized the procedure.
Patriot, Sarah Palin's comment about being able to "see Russia from her house" was not taken out of context – because she never said it.
Tina Fey said it in an impression of Palin on SNL.
I look forward to seeing it when it makes it to Redbox.
I look forward to the day Matt Damon is a convert.
Carl, has a former Kozlowski, it pains me to say this, but I think your reviews are written to protect your career and to have the other side like you; "See, I'm a conservative but I think liberal movies are cool, and I'm available for your next project"…I believe this is your second review, and the second time and I'm sensing a pattern.
I thought Matt Damon gave a fantastic performance in "Team America".
I live in the "small town hell" that this story takes place in. Most of us didn't find this sordid affair that funny when it happened.
It's great to see so many people posting their disgust of this leftie scumbag Damon. I guess you never know how much you have in common with other Americans until you read a movie review of a socialist pig multi millionaire.
ADM: largest recepient of subsidies for ethanol and high fructose corn syrup. Take away the subsidies and tariffs and ADM is exposed as an overpriced soybean crusher. Buyer of Jimmy Carter's peanut Processing plant and employer oh Chip, Amy and many other politician's children. Use to host the Sunday morning talk shows where guests receive speaking fees. Fascism at it's finest! So, who's interests does it serve to color Whitaker as a nut? Supermarket to the World!!!!! Your tax dollars at work.
I don't think the R-rating for this movie is for the same reasons as the movies you mention. I've seen the commercials. It's definitely not for anyone in my family. You'd really think some enterprising moviemaker would realize the HUGE market for clean, but grown-up movies. But I guess that sort of thing is not on their radar screens. They live in a bubble.
Kit In Ohio has Carl down. Steve is a nutball; but not an ADM nutball. I always read these threads to decide if I'm going to line lefties pockets. Not this time.
I wish I could say I cared about this movie enough to have an opinion on it. From the previews I saw, I had no idea it was based on a true story, let alone a serious one. It just looked too goofy to waste my time on it, even if it does seem fairly harmless.
I wouldn't see this little douchebag's movie if someone gave me free tickets and threw in 20 bucks for refreshments. Simply can't watch him. Too much like Tom Ripley, and less like Jason Bourne. When Matt Damon acknowledges that Putin is NOT the President of Russia, yet skewers Sarah Palin for the "I can see Russia from my house" comment, which was totally taken out of context, I might change my mind. Until then, he won't miss me – I won't miss him.
Steve is correct! ADM sponsored/sponsors the Sunday morning talk shows and is the largest recipient of ethanol subsidies and benefactor of sugar tariffs. No tariffs. No subsidies. No ADM. Follow the money!
Come on, there's nothing wrong with an R-rated movie every now and then. (And most people would agree that a rating is no guarantee of a film's quality, and sometimes, like with Schindler's List or Saving Private Ryan or Black Hawk Down or The Passion, that rating is there for a reason.)
Scott, you don't need ANY F-words. In fact, it drives me crazy when a movie has ONE instance of bad language. What a stoopid thing to do.
Movies like Casablana and Citizen Kane are still rated among the best movies ever made. We know the lead characters no doubt used bad language, but we never hear it. We don't need to. If those movies were made today, complete with R-rating, they would not be better movies.
After I make my first million, I'll start the film company.
How about learning to count? This is about my 12th post and 6th or 7th review, i'm in a hurry right now or i'd take the time to guide you through them.
Protecting my career?! HA! If you took 5 seconds to look at my section, you'd see i wrote a pretty vicious takedown of President Obama that was the #1 post the day it ran. I can't tell you how many people got angry at me from my past for that one.
Feel free to keep hiding out in Ohio where you don't have to risk anything when you speak up. I love all the people here who say "i won't see a movie by someone because of their politics" or whatever to get on their high horse. Think for yourself, it's a refreshing feeling. I'm able to separate the fiction of a movie from the reality of a person. I know, i know, what a concept. Like taking the 5 seconds it would have taken to actually see what i've posted and that I've been far more daring towards my career than you'll be in 5 lifetimes towards yours.
With all due respect, you are not entitled to the fruits of other people's labour. (furtively deletes some TV shows from HD)
I know the R rating isn't for the same reason. I typed that at work and was just rattling films off the top of my head.
One thing I've learned is that there are plenty of movies filmmakers WANT to make but the studio bureaucracy is against it. Why? I don't know. I usually blame the management before the artist (not that the artist knows all). Studios (in their quest for as much $$$ as possible) are inclined to make movies with built-in "franchise potential" (Transformers, etc.). As the old tale goes, if they can't imagine the movie poster and the tagline, then there won't be a movie. What a shame.
Although I do agree – if I were a filmmaker and I made a light-hearted movie with, say, 3 f-words, I'd be inclined to take two or all of them out to get a lower rating.
Did Kozlowski leave halfway through the movie? The film doesn't gloss over Whitacre's misdoings in the least–in fact, they're the focus of the entire second half of the film. I saw it, enjoyed it thoroughly. Damon was terrific, and there's an amazing collection of cameos by very cool character actors and comedians. (Clancy Brown! Patton Oswalt! BOTH Smothers Brothers!) They definitely got their money out of Marvin Hamlisch in a good and bad way: his music gets a little cutesy after a while, but it certainly fits the mood of the film.
Oh–and how are the Damon haters going to resolve his next film: starring in Clint Eastwood's supernatural film "Hereafter?" ;-D
As many others feel this could be one of the best films every made and I will never watch it. I made a choice a few years ago that ther are certain actors and directors I will never support no matter what. This is one of those times.
OK. She said you can "actually see Russia from land, here in Alaska" in her interview with Charlie Gibson on YouTube. It was twisted around. That was my point. Matt Damon made fun of HER, and the whole time was referring to Putin as President of Russia, versus Prime Minister of Russia.
I don't know. I think it's kind of stupid to being doing a comedy about Archer Daniel Midland when they are the blueprint of what's wrong with American corporations.
'Refreshingly apolitical.'
And the bad guys control an EVIL CORPORTATION (that happend to feed half the world). Ya, I suppose that passes for 'apolitical' in the People's Republic of Obama.
Count me out.
"I think it's kind of stupid to being doing a comedy about Archer Daniel Midland when they are the blueprint of what's wrong with American corporations."
Huh? Since when aren't bad things good subjects for humor? What should comedy be aimed at but what's "wrong" with something?
Speaking as a Conservative, stop being a Tightass blinded by Idealogy.
A Faux Conservative would have just that attitude. Just where do you stand? Where do you draw the line? If you put money into the pockets of liberals for some cheap entertainment that says you don't have true principles and are willing to sell out conservatism cheap. Thanks for the tightass complement by the way. Yours must be pretty loose by now from all that bending over to liberals and taking it where the moon don't shine.
Who wrote the book? I would rather read than watch Matt Damon anyday…
I'll wait 'til it comes to DVD and borrow it from my friend who has some weird compulsion to buy every DVD ever made. I'm very creative when it comes to seeing the movies of those I don't wish to support monetarily.
You must be logged in to post a comment.