Review: ‘District 9’–An Alien Internment Camp?
by Carl KozlowskiIs it possible for a film to be both a brilliant, exciting piece of entertainment, and also a completely illogical piece of heavy-handed political propaganda? It is, if the new science-fiction oddity “District 9” is any indication.
Led by a stunning performance by Sharlto Copley, who is not only unknown to audiences outside South Africa, but who had never acted in anything but short films before, “District 9” blasts through its running time with a furious mix of action and satire. Yet its central plotline, focusing on what might happen if space aliens approached Johannesburg and were then held in a segregated district for nearly three decades, is riddled with holes and bangs viewers over the head with its allegories of racial discrimination harkening back to the evil days of that nation’s apartheid policies.
The film kicks off with a fast-paced blend of fake newscasts and faux-documentary footage shot by a camera crew that’s been assigned to cover a mass evacuation of aliens from their home in the city’s District 9. The aliens had come in a giant mother ship back in 1982, but no one has ever figured out why they arrived and left the ship to hover eternally over Johannesburg.
In a series of darkly witty and disturbingly tense newsclips, it is revealed that humans helped bring the million aliens found aboard the giant spacecraft down to earth. But tensions have exacerbated between humans and aliens over the last 27 years, with the ugly space creatures taking pleasure in wreaking havoc on society and generally living at odds with the humans around them.
Finally, the government decides to trick the aliens to sign forms that will force them into being evacuated to a new tent city 240 kilometers outside the city. But when many of the aliens don’t want to move and the human cops start playing a little too rough, fighting breaks out unexpectedly.
Even worse for the humans is that their mission’s leader, a nerdy bureaucrat named Wikus (played by Copley), stumbles across some nasty fluid the aliens have secretly developed and is now transforming into an alien himself. When he has to go on the run to avoid being turned into the world’s greatest scientific experiment, the film turns into a suspenseful chase thriller augmented by Copley’s ever-more-tragic performance, as he loses his humanity and is terribly aware that by extension, he’s losing his wife and their life together.
With stellar special effects, superbly seamless editing between the fake documentary footage and the “newscasts,” and Copley’s multilayered, star-making role, there’s plenty to recommend “District 9” – and the film has scoredan almost unmatched 97 percent approval rating from US and British critics on the Rotten Tomatoes site. But once viewers step back out of the theater and into the light of day, myriad questions will unfold to anyone who gives the film a second thought.
I’ll place the countless questions under a SPOILER ALERT:
The film never explains why the aliens came to earth, which creates a nice sense of foreboding and mystery for a while until it dissipates with the realization that the writer/director Neil Blomkamp will never bother to explain it. The aliens – who look so much like the space beast in “Predator” that a lawsuit might be called for – and humans manage to communicate, despite the fact subtitles are used to explain the aliens’ language for the viewer and no explanation is given of how the aliens have come to understand earthly English without speaking it themselves, and how the humans understand them in return.
Worst of all, the film attempts to utilize its faux-documentary approach throughout its running time despite the fact that cameras would surely have been banned from the premises while the government attempts its dastardly experiments on Wikus in his hybrid human/alien state. And when Wikus is on the run, dashing through streets and leaping over and climbing under spaces into which humans could never fit, the documentary crew is ludicrously there with a perfect shot at all times. If you think that NBC’s sitcom “The Office” occasionally films an unbelievable angle, this might result in scoffing laughter.
There’s also a little thing on earth called gravity, yet the aliens’ mother ship is able to float above it for nearly three decades without falling from the sky. (Come to think of it, why don’t spaceships EVER fall out of the sky in movies like this and “Independence Day”? And how come, with perhaps the exception of E.T.. – who was still hardly a beauty queen – all film aliens are the ugliest creatures imaginable?)
But on a serious note, the film is attempting to score points off apartheid – a policy that was eradicated by South Africans in 1994, a full 15 years ago. The aliens are dark-skinned, and all the humans pursuing them are white, despite the fact that the government and all levels of society have been integrated or even overwhelmingly black for the past decade and a half. But since this is a movie that has to push an agenda, the aliens (blacks) wind up far more sympathetic than the white humans chasing them.
This might have been brilliant 20 years ago, as a piece of agitprop designed to stir the masses against the elitist white power structure. But coming so late in the game, “District 9” is like an over-decorated yet forgettable Christmas present: attractive on the surface but extremely disappointing within.




Subscribe via RSS
180 Comments
They can hover because of fusion powered anti gravity watchamacallits or something like that I'm sure. Our nuke subs and aircraft carriers can run for years and years before having to refuel. I'm going to go see this movie later on today and I hope it doesn't disappoint. Though I was already disappointed because at first I thought this was the new Halo movie.
The author asks: "And how come, with perhaps the exception of E.T.. – who was still hardly a beauty queen – all film aliens are the ugliest creatures imaginable?)" What about the 5th element with Leeloo and Diva Plavalaguna?
It's quite clearly explained that the ship that hovers of Joburg became detached from a bigger ship and got lost, finally finding its way to Earth and stopping right above South Africa. Also, in regards to the language barrier – in the movie aliens and humans have been living together for more than 20 years – plenty of time to learn one anothers language. It's also shown that, while the two species do understand one another, things do get lost in translation. While being asked to sign the eviction papers one alien asks "what is eviction?" And there are plenty of conversation Wikus has with Christopher Johnson in which they both have trouble understanding what the other is saying. What did you need, a scene where the aliens give the humans Webster's Alien to English translation book? Sorry this stuff wasn't spoonfed to you.
Also, you don't know what you're talking about here:
"Worst of all, the film attempts to utilize its faux-documentary approach throughout its running time…"
You do realize that the film switched between the doc-style and the more traditional/classic cinematic style, right? The whole film was not meant to be documentary style. The movie subtley shifts from doc style to traditional around the time Wikus makes his escape, and the chase sequence begins. Sure news footage, security cameras, and interviews are still used, but the camera crew that accompanied MNU ceases to exist at that point and the fourth wall comes up.
If you didn't understand that, stop reviewing movies. Please.
Yet another movie that I will never watch. I love movies. I do. However, I am sick of the political leftists making agenda driven films that take the fun out of everything. I want entertainment, not indoctrination. Hey, Big Hollywood bigshots; where are your films to counter these?
*chirp*
If you mean what you say, then make waves (and movies) and not just blog posts.
Mandalorians are some of the hottest aliens out there!
And the aliens in "The Abyss" remarkably resemble Kaminoan scientists ("Star Wars" prequels II and III), albeit with wings. Very beautiful.
and let us not forget the Green Girl from Star Trek.
I thought "The Matrix" is an excellent movie about throwing off the chains of illusion and seeing reality instead before fighting against the immense, well-entrenched "machine". The Matrix IS the Obama administration in particular, but also the trap by which the Democrat V. Republican game has ensnared most Americans.
I'm glad that you noted that all the "Bad" humans are white. I so want to rewrite movies and TV shows (Alien Nation movie & TV show come to mind) so that there some Black "Racist / anti-alien" officials. Just like the REAL BLACK RACIST. in real life.
I can see Jessie Jackson & Al Sharpton protesting outside the camps!
I saw a preview of this at Comic Con and just from the few minutes I saw, the apartheid allegory is so freakin' obvious, it beats you over the head like a heavy iron skillet. I thought, "Hey, didn't this end like 20 years ago?" And why would aliens capable of building huge spaceships and traveling the galaxy (something we've yet to accomplish) settle for living in a crappy shantytown on a backwater, bassackwards planet? I wouldn't.
You don't seem to get it, whites are so inherently evil that they cannot help themselves. They attacks blacks, hispanics, indians, arabs, and now aliens. White people are just evil, and have never helped a single person on this planet with anything. Minorities never do wrong, and ofcourse would love aliens, love them sweetly, kissing them and holding hands while the whites killed them, as they sang Kum By Ya. Malcolm X might be there talking about the crakers cracking aliens, while MJK could come along and have an aliens march on washington. You just need to open your eyes and see the beauty in this, and stop being such a racist. You do know that it is racist to ever wonder why whites are portrayed as evil all the time, even by other whites. It is an Obamanation and that crap won't fly like it did under the evil Bush.
If the mother ship can hover for years, wouldn't they have the energy to move about the globe too?
Yvonne Craig, aka: Bat Girl. Dang I had a crush on her
Once I heard Peter Jackson was associated with it, I was out.
It was left out of the review because it doesn't back up the author's false accusation that this film is made by liberals who think "white people bad/black people good" made this movie.
I'm willing to bed you didn't even know what apartheid was until you read this review.
And the aliens don't "settle" for coming to Earth; the ship that hovers above Joburgh got detached from a bigger ship and became lost. That's how it arrived here. Of course, I wouldn't have had to explain that to you (or the reviewer, who understands the movie about as much as Joe the Plumber understands welfare) if you had actually seen the movie before commenting on it.
I hate the Reverse Discrimination as much as the next person here, but your Sarcastic "Rant" is so extreme and unsubtle that it becomes sort of self parody and its unfunny.
Leave Comedy to the Funny people.
I hate the Reverse Discrimination as much as the next person here, but your Sarcastic "Rant" is so extreme and unsubtle that it becomes sort of self parody and its unfunny. Try making it less blatant next time so we think you are being serious at first.
Leave Comedy to the Funny people.
Played by the incredibly hot Rachel Nichols. The Orion women in Star Trek are all pretty hot.
I would also add the Twileks in Star Wars.
Woops forgot to include that…
But ok, so then the film is playing it both ways in a really weird fashion. On the one hand, Whitey is out to control and kill the pseudo-black aliens. On the other hand, the only significant black roles after a wimpy guy gets wasted early are these outright thugs that are about the worst portrayal of blacks I've seen in ages. Another example, i believe, of the illogic that runs rampant through this film – blacks are either total victims or outright evil.
not sure if Bat Girl could be considered an alien, but sill hot.
indeed, something about those head tentacles.
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!
But instead they just hover over a crappy shantytown.
so that's where Calypso Louie Farakahn's mother ship slipped off to. South Africa.
Rob: just so you know. You got her name right . It was Yvonne Craig who played the Orion slave girl/asylum resident in Star Trek.
Money, son. Investors. It takes money to make films–especially these colossal Sci Fi epics like this pic. You can't make every film using one video camera, sparklers, and an erector set and expect to compete with something like District 9. And special effects firms don't work pro-bono. You want to counter these? Don't see them. See something else that you agree with, enjoy, whatever. Hollywood follows the profits. If something is profitable, they'll make it.
You know what's an awesome movie about aliens on Earth being forced to live in camps and then integrate into human society? Alien Nation! They should just bring that back.
No worse then you assuming what people do or don't know and it's not like liberal reviewers use movies as excuse to push their platforms on us. I remember how one critic used the third Pirates of the Caribbean movies to show how we were losing our freedoms under Bush. I saw the trailer for this and in that time I knew it was going to be the heavy handed liberal message but according to you I can't say anything but strange it doesn't stop you who are a biased jerk from running your mouth.
Don't those seem somewhat phallic though? I mean, they might come in handy for a Twi on Twi lesbian thing if you are into that, but otherwise those tentacles could be scary.
No mention of T'Pol? And there were numerous hotties in the Stargate series. Jill Wagner as Larrin in Stargate Atlantis comes to mind. Vanessa Angel in SG1, along with a few others. True, they were all human-like, but alien cuties regardless.
Sure, I'll make a movie. I know I've got a spare 50-60 million just laying around somewhere in my two room apartment! Maybe it's in my other pants!
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GreenS... It's called Green Skinned Space Babes… I want to hook up with an Asari from Mass Effect.
hmm I'm originally from Joburg, so I'm curious about the movie.
The political allegory may be over the top, but you know so what? And to the commentator who says "didn't apartheid end like 20 years ago". Well yes kinda and your point? Maybe they shouldn't make films about the Nazi Holocaust 'cause that like ended more than sixty years ago, and why make films about slavery 'cause that ended like a hundred and fifty years ago, and well I could go on with more examples.
How droll that Carl "Comin' Atcha!" Kozlowski (seriously, that author photo is a scream) can't really be bothered to pay attention to any of "District 9"'s actual plot points, because he's to eager to hold his nose, wave a hand in the air, and drawl, "Apartheid? That was SO fifteen years ago." Well played as always!
This sounds unbelievably stupid. Aliens with space travel technology and other advanced technology coming to Earth are not "poor innocent Black people under Apartheid." They are, historically the Black Fleet in Tokyo Bay scaring the hell out of the late Edo period Shogunate.
That's a better story — Aliens show up, demonstrate the current regime is useless against them and isolationism, technological backwardness to preserve culture does not work and makes a people conquered, frantic modernization to save some, though not all, of native culture. Even better, it illustrates the struggle to remain what one is, and be conquered, or join the world/universe, and lose part of what one was.
The screenplay seems PC-101. Those evil White guys and governments, even when they are technologically backwards and overawed by god-like technology. Pointedly ignoring the obvious: while Apartheid South Africa was a disaster, post-Apartheid South Africa has been even worse — the current regime unable to provide even a minimal level of security, rule of law, or basic services, with superstitious ("AIDS caused by 'spores' and cured by sex with virgins") and polygamous Presidents spending most of their energy in looting the treasury.
I am intrigued by the film despite Blomkamp's admission that it is pure apartheid agit-prop. I would be willing to bet that Blomkamp might admit that it is no longer relevant for South Africa, but that it is more than relevant to a certain location and between certain parties in the Middle East. I wonder if this film will go down in John Nolte's book as one of those liberal propagandistic films that succeed on the quality of its product, rather than the message the film sends.
You two didn't see the movie, obviously.
Might want to do that before commenting on it.
ah, now we're touring all my geek fantasies.
Though I'm probably telling you something you already know, Blomkamp was working on Halo when conflict between the studios pulled the plug on the movie. He and Peter Jackson got along so well, that Jackson asked Blomkamp what he wanted to do next and District 9 was born.
Lets bet.
Again, they made a point of saying that the aliens on board were like worker ants or drone bees. They aren't the most capable. It reminds me of a couple of years ago when Castro was seriously ill and i remember one pundit saying that the people of Cuba literally wouldn't know how to function without Castro and the government. Same thing in North Korea.
I'm still disgusted at that thought and it's why I view Leftism as subhuman. So, I took the aliens inabilities as a sign that their species suffers from the same ideological wars that we do. And the result is a group of people/aliens that can only sit and wait to die while hovering over South Africa.
I doubt that was the writers intent but enough room was left in the story for me to fill in my own blanks.
Where and when did Blomkamp admit that? Link to source, please.
So they have an unlimited supply of clean energy and they do nothing with it? I dislike them already.
Lots of babes in Star Trek, but Sherry Jackson (What are little girls made of?) takes the crown. I must have first seen that episode when I was six and I found her cute even then.
I would argue that the vast majority of sci-fi films have right wing Conservative messages which is why i love the genre. Take the Star Wars prequels. They were originally made to specifically bash Bush but what were they really saying? Of course, no to tyranny. But we see the emperor staying in office well past his term limits.
Who does that? Not the western world. It's every Leftist nation from the former USSR to N. Korea to Cuba. It's Hugo Chavez. Recently it's Communist leaning Zelaya in Honduras. Well he tried to anyway. (with Obama's blessing)
I think we on the Right love our country so much that we're too sensitive to criticism, even if the criticism is directed towards our Leftist policies or Leftist history.
P.S. Leftism sucks.
Carl,
I have to ask, what did you think of the apathetic way they practiced eugenics, the forced abortions? Population control is an incredibly Leftist ideal.
Both historically, USSR, Nazi's, Margaret Sanger, W.E.B. Dubois, China etc. and even today we see it as an extension of the environmentalist movement. All under the guise of the greater good.
Can anyone name one Conservative ideal that District 9 attacks?
I got dibs on Natira from Farscape (the best tv scifi ever)
Lots of irony here. Lucas made episodes 1-3 with the Chancellor using a war he manufactured to seize and consolidate power. Never being one to be subtle one can't help but get run over by the heavy handed symbolism for Bush and the Iraq War, which Lucas himself admitted. The truely funny part to all this is Lucas was right but about the wrong guy, It wasn't Bush it's Obama who while giving lip service to the ideals of the nation really loathes everything this country stands for and is trying to consolidate power under his rule. Now it gets really good, Lucas like the rest of the liberals who kept warning us of a dictator with a friendly face have completely fallen for him and are actively helping him.
Pleas! Forget Star Wars 1,2,&3. The ONLY fi;m of the 6 worth talking about is # 5, "The Empire Strikes Back".
It was the best film because it was the one that Lucas had the least input. When he saw how good it was, He "big footed" himself into the rest of them.
Yep. A guy who talks openly about exploiting crises!
Having said that, Obama is not a dictator, though not for a lack of trying. He will be gone, I swear it. If conservatives keep their wits about them and the GOP has any sense, he could be gone in 2012.
I haven´t seen it. The story seems to be flogging a dead horse, but apartheid was wrong and opposing it is not automatically "leftist" just because the left is better at exploiting race. Conservatives should never cede that ground to the left.
Yes, that would be a better story. Far more ambitious. (though note the comments here about these aliens being just worker bees – at least it makes some sense that way)
As for your second point, there is something to what you say, but what were they supposed to do, make their peace with apartheid? Apartheid was wrong. You fight the wrong in front of you. Like removing Saddam: messy but right. And we still don´t know where South Africa will end up.
That's the point I'm trying to make. The Right does not stand for apartheid. Quite the opposite, we're the individualists. The Lefties are the collectivists.
However, since the 1960's, the Left saw race as a way to divide and conquer. "Conquer" being the ultimate goal. The Left spent 100 years blocking civil rights, then all of a sudden they're the party of civil rights? It's our fault for allowing the lie to go unchallenged.
FUN FACT OF THE DAY: Abe Lincoln didn't receive the Republican nomination for his second term because he caved in to the Dems and wouldn't grant full rights to freed slaves. (his VP, Hannibal Hammlin, also refused to run with him on those grounds. He was deemed a "Radical Republican.")
"But we see the emperor staying in office well past his term limits."
thankfully, Bush stepped down peaceably. But we did have our own "Darth Vader" unapologetically working to expand the powers of the executive branch at the expense of our own "Galactic Congress".
I agree with you. My point was how funny it is Lucas who used ep 1-3 in an attempt to bash Bush finds them more relevant to Obama but if you point that out to him he would probably say your nuts and go about how wonderful he is and how he supports him completely.
I doubt it, but it's part of human nature to jump to conclusions.
What are you, a mook?
I like ep 4, 5 and 6 until the Ewoks show up, this was the warning of were Lucas was headed. Episode 4 was where Lucas' inablity to be subtle actually worked in his favor. This was the end of the 70s and Hollywood was stuck in another moral revelancy rut. Episode 4 was clear about who the good guys and bad guys were and people were yearning for that kind of movie.
"The aliens are dark-skinned, and all the humans pursuing them are white,"
SPOILER ALERT
How did you manage to miss that the film has TWO sets of bad guys, the (mostly) white paramilitary guys (the SA gov isn't in charge of District 9, a private military-contractor is) but ALSO a Nigerian crimeboss and his gang who represent probably the scariest African villians since Hotel Rwanda? They've even got a voodoo-esque priestess and a psychotic plan to eat the aliens to get their "power." I'm willing to bet that doesn't go over very well in some quarters…
In any case, I loved it. Easily the best adult (it's almost "Rambo IV" violent in some areas) action movie of the Summer: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/escap...
Yes his name is Rahm Emanual and the Emperor is Obama. Again it's funny how you liberals whined about Bush but now blindly and unquestiongly follow the Sith Lord himself…(making hand motion) no need to read the 1,000 page report…move along"
Like I care what you have to say, sucking up to Soderbergh in his megabomb "Girlfriend Experience." Talk about crossing the line, focus on yourself.
There's only so much space to address things – but yeah that was interesting, especially considering Sanger's desire to rid society of as many blacks as possible. The movie doesn't portray that positively though, of course. Wikus seems crazed at that point, really sick mindset.
I know plenty about eugenics movement, have done a couple articles in the past on it and the fact that Caltech to this day accepts a fellowship endowment from the estate of one of its (eugenics') most ardent advocates.
Imagine if Rambo had those weapons.
Not going to see this one for one simple, logical fallacy I see in the movie. The space aliens who can fly through the cosmos and has some kind of weapons that humans have somehow get "tricked" into being held in a "interment camp"? HUH? How the hell does that work?
Effects look amazing. Plot looks stupid. And if I can't buy the premise of a movie like this, then I won't enjoy it.
I just saw it and I really enjoyed this movie. Sure I'd like to know why the ship got stranded on Earth (maybe they'll save that for the DVD commentary) but the pacing was good, the acting was great, and I really gave a damn about what happened to the main characters.
With the exception of a few aliens, most of these aren't too bright. As someone stated earlier (or was it said the the movie, I can't remember ) I think these aliens are kind of a drone-worker class who don't really think for themselves.
"The space aliens who can fly through the cosmos and has some kind of weapons that humans have somehow get "tricked" into being held in a "interment camp"? HUH? How the hell does that work?"
SPOILERS
FWIW, they haven't been "tricked." The ship – though massive to us – is a derelict that seems to have bee repurposed as a sort of life-raft for the aliens inside; most of whom (we're told) are starving, malnourished "worker bee" members of their species largely unable to repair/operate the equipment they've been using. It's a drift-boat of refugees, basically.
Thomas, curious if you think that Winston Churchill was a leftist or a socialist?
The discoveries of healing science must be the inheritance of all. That is clear. Disease must be attacked, whether it occurs in the poorest or the richest man or woman simply on the ground that it is the enemy; and it must be attacked just in the same way as the fire brigade will give its full assistance to the humblest cottage as readily as to the most important mansion. Our policy is to create a national health service in order to ensure that everybody in the country, irrespective of means, age, sex, or occupation, shall have equal opportunities to benefit from the best and most up-to-date medical and allied services available. – Winston Churchhill, March 1944
"the NHS is safe in our hands.” – Margaret Thatcher
Thomas, curious if you think that Winston Churchill was a leftist or a socialist?
"The discoveries of healing science must be the inheritance of all. That is clear. Disease must be attacked, whether it occurs in the poorest or the richest man or woman simply on the ground that it is the enemy; and it must be attacked just in the same way as the fire brigade will give its full assistance to the humblest cottage as readily as to the most important mansion. Our policy is to create a national health service in order to ensure that everybody in the country, irrespective of means, age, sex, or occupation, shall have equal opportunities to benefit from the best and most up-to-date medical and allied services available." – Winston Churchhill, March 1944
"the NHS is safe in our hands.” – Margaret Thatcher
None, of course, but I'm willing to bet people throw a hissy-fit about the "villianizing" of private-military outfits
I normally enjoy reading the movie reviews on this site, but this one is laughable. In a summer where most of the films have been written for 10 year old intellects, why hate on a grim, thought-provoking adult film with over the top violence and 2 of the best alien characters ever put on film (Christopher Johnson and his son little CJ)? Especially when you haven't seen it? Most of the questions raised here (like Jerb's) are clearly answered in the film, and if you've ever lived in Africa there are a few "in" jokes that had my whole family laughing.
uh, no. Obama's main problem it seems – potentially the theme of his presidency if he fails to shape up, is that he is a weak executive, and ceeding far too much policy initiative piloting to Congress.
For all of Rahm's reputation of a Congressional task master, we have yet to see it.
I don't expect anyone here to acknowlegde what I'm describing. The only words it seems that comes into your minds when Obama is mentioned…"bad", "Hitler", "racist", "socialist", "terrorist", "Muslim", etc.
Yeah, what he said. You definitely seem to pay more attention than I do.
You just got schooled over at movieline.com: http://www.movieline.com/2009/08/conservative-cri...
I’m sorry Mr. Talionis, but your FUN FACT OF THE DAY is somewhat misleading. In fact, Lincoln’s supporters completely dominated the 1864 National Union Convention, which was held on June 7-8 in Baltimore, Maryland, and he was renominated with 484 of the 506 votes cast. The National Union Party was a newly-formed alliance of pro-Lincoln Republicans and loyal northern War Democrats, by the way. As for Vice-President Hannibal Hammlin, the convention failed to renominate him because Lincoln refused to endorse him. Instead, Lincoln largely threw the choice of the vice-presidential candidate to the convention delegates.
Now, there was some vocal opposition to Lincoln’s renomination, especially early on in the process. In fact, a small alternative convention was held by disaffected Republican Radicals on May 31 in Cleveland. Styling themselves the Radical Democracy Party, they selected John C. Fremont to run for the presidency. However, Fremont ultimately abandoned his campaign in September after cutting a deal with Lincoln. In the end, Lincoln prevailed in 1864 as the de-facto Republican standard bearer because his various opponents within the party were never able to agree on an alternative candidate.
That was me. And yes it is specifically said in the movie that they are drone-workers.
It sounds to me more like outright thugs that are about the most accurate portrayal of a lot of what goes on in black Africa made in ages.
Cannabalism, and a level of superstition which would be considered outright psychotic in the West, are alive and well in Africa.
I have seen the movie and this review ignores a lot to make a point. This movie is political, but I think it fairly skewers both sides of the fence, and is mainly interested in ridiculing the human condition. It's not "hard" sci-fi, which is to say, there's a lot of stuff that doesn't seem probable or even possible in it. Movies of this kind need to be consistent to their own internal realities and rules. For the most part this movie is. There are a couple of glaring exceptions, but you can easily concoct your own explanations, or just let them go. I liked the movie a lot more than some of the other guys who attended the screening.
SPOILER ALERT
The first half hour of the movie has a lot of humor in it, but it's very 'down under' in nature. If you have enjoyed Australian comedies, or laughed at Peter Jackson's early films, you'll get it. I'm not sure how many members of the American audience belong to this subset of movie fans. It's like British humor, only even more so and somewhat more lowbrow. For me, the novelty of the premise and the humor easily carried me to the part where the film became more action-based. However, some of the other guys said it was a slow starting film.
There is a point in the movie where one of the characters does something very plot driven. This was a turning point some people who at that point stopped being on the side of the film, and started nitpicking. It bothered me some, but I thought the film redeemed itself nicely in the third act. It should be clear to anybody who pays attention, that the documentary bits are supplemented by scenes not available to the documentary makers. If it wasn't obvious in the movie, it should be obvious at the end when people in the interviews express ignorance of things that the audience knows.
There is a mixture of intelligence and stupidity in this movie, but I think it only helps to illustrate what a mixed bag humanity is. The movie is just as hard on liberal idealism as it is on military culture, so don't expect the film to either validate or trash your beliefs. It's not a perfect sci-fi film, but lets face it, the sci-fi films that really do get it all right in terms of consistency and believability usually come up short in the actually being entertaining department. Still, compared to your average summer fare, this movie does leave you with quite a bit to think about, and you probably won't be looking at your watch at all, after the first half hour. The effects are great. The aliens are cool. The violence is in the breezy comic style. Nobody is likely to get nightmares from it. I can't imagine what more you could want out of a summer sci-fi action movie. Go see it.
This is such a shame. Sci-Fi movies as a genre are Conservative home-runs. Just look at the above picture. Doesn't it reek of condescending political correctness?
This is an example of not being able to see the forest because of all the trees.
Who here, if they were on a seaplane which made an emergency landing in the ocean because the pilot had a heart attack, would be able to take off and fly home safely?
Yes I do know what apartheid was, which is why I instantly recognized the segregated shantytowns. They look exactly like the ones seen regularly on t.v. news and the papers back in the 1980s.
I've already stated I I haven't seen the whoooole movie, just a short preview of it. This review says it's never explained why the aliens were there. Maybe that's inaccurate. But if they were capable of far better technology and have greater strength than your average Earthling, why wait 27 years to do anything? Were they all unarmed liberals
?
You ripped this off of movieline
Don't forget the word "Czar" . . . oh wait, that's Obama's word.
Episode I came out 10 years ago, while Bubba Clinton was still running around with his boxers round his ankles in the White House. George Lucas started writing the script in 1994. He had no idea Bush was going to be elected. Moreover, Episode II was also written and most of it was filmed prior to Bush's election in November 2000. Revenge of the Sith is the only one that was written and filmed entirely during Bush's administration. Some people think that one was the big Bush bash-o-rama, but aside from one line that doesn't make that much sense in that context, it's really not specific to anything that happened in that time.
You are right in that Lucas had the correct idea but doesn't realize he's playing out exactly what he wrote in the films. But I think in the case of the Star Wars prequels, which I think are terrific films in their own right, he was willing to let the loony left think whatever it wanted about them.
First, Socialism is Leftism. And yes Winston Churchill was a Socialist. He, like FDR, admired Mussolini's new form of Leftism, FASCISM, as "an antidote for Communism." Tony Blair is also a Socialist. That's why when my good friend from England actually needed a complex medical procedure, he had to come to the U.S.
Almost all of Europe is Socialist. It's not a curse word. Eugenics is the practice of population control. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, wrote two papers, A Plan for Peace, where she argued that limiting population would ease the strain on resources and bring peace. Second was "A Race of Thoroughbreds" where she argued that by forced sterilization of undesirables and selective breeding we would create human thoroughbreds.
Of course the Nazi's agreed and the communists even developed the gas used to kill the Jews . . . though in fairness to the communists, they felt you shouldn't draw racial lines, you should decide who lives based on your value to society. (the collective)
Eugenics is linked to Universal healthcare because cost is used to determine if it's worth giving expensive treatment to the elderly. Obama even gave the example of his grandmother who had a hip replacement to ease the last year of her life. Under Universal, it doesn't happen.
I took the evening off from politics and had a good time at the movies. Everything said above about apartheid metaphors is right on. Yeah its annoying. Business is evil, blah blah, blah. That said it had many of the elements I like in a good movie. A buddy action movie with lots of cool effects, and a nice love story to boot. Go, enjoy.
Do you know what the deal was to get Fremont to drop out? A Constitutional Amendment abolishing slavery.
And the Union Party was formed in the first place because the Republicans were already trying to put up another candidate (Salmon Chase). Just like today, politicians must play politics and they must win elections. I'm aware of Lincoln's passion for civil rights but he still had to win the election.
According to "Alive in Joburg", the short that "District 9" is based on, they steal electricity from the city power grid. That really doesn't make sense. They have to steal power to keep the ship running but they don't set down to conserve energy?
Then there was Mathilda May as the hot, naked space vampire from "Lifeforce".
Really it's easy to find plenty of hot alien women in the SF genre.
Again you dodged the question. For 8 years you liberals screamed "dissent is patriotic and question authority!" and encouraged protest against Bush and his policies now that Obama is in suddenly the it's un-American to question the president and any who does is a paid facist thug. You won't answer the question because you can't it's the usual liberal hypocrisy.
Awesome call on T'Pol and Larrin. How could I forget those?
If you're referring to the Mandalorians in Star Wars, they're human.
Great call on the Kaminoans. They were very graceful and their language was a nice contrast to the other species in the universe.
Yes your right about that timeline of the movies but Lucas did make several statements that the movies did apply to the Iraq War and Bush, remember Jedi when he said that the battle on Endor was an allegory for the Vietnam War? (that's when Star Wars wasn't so special to me). As for ep 1-3 I think they aren't as good as ep 4 and 5 but they did get better with each movie. The biggest problem with them is the story is multi-thread story with the main one being the Chancellor playing a complex game to take over the Republic. Problem is as I've noted is Lucas doesn't do subtle or complex well. Which is why things like Anakins turning over to the dark side seem to quick and having no real reason.
Also like Rhodesia now Zimbabwe they threw out the white ruling class but ended up with a leader who turned into a brutal tyrant. Is better being opressed by your own then someone else? That would make a great sci-fi movie
Wow, I never thought we'd agree on anything. But Obama does seem to prefer being a 'hands off' kind of guy that appoints people who are actively working behind the scenes.
Rahm, his brother has been rather active in the healthcare issue. I wonder how he would have been there if not for his dancing brother?
many of your lazy "points" have been debunked nicely by other posters, re the gravity, switching from documentary to film and back, and language barriers and such, so let let me add this: you think these aliens look like Predator? are you blind? they look nothing alike. as for apartheid being over, etc., let me introduce you to the alternate reality concept; we're accepting a modern day where a starship descended 27 years ago. It's one of the best scifi movies i've seen in a long, long time. doesn't deserve to be hated on by someone who clearly wasn't paying attention.
Turning that around: Who here would rather die trying to fly the plane back home to their family than sit in a perfectly good plane until a slow and painful death comes upon them?
"I'm aware of Lincoln's passion for civil rights but he still had to win the election."
Precisely the point I was driving at in my own heavy-handed, overbearing way—on this point we appear to be agreed. As to the deal to get Fremont to drop out, I’m only aware to two elements: 1) the promise of a new command for Fremont in the Union army with the rank of major general; and 2) the dismissal of Postmaster General Montgomery Blair, an old political enemy of Fremont’s. After Fremont quit the race, Lincoln held up his end of the bargain by dismissing Blair. On the other hand, I don’t know that Fremont ever actually received the new command he was promised. Maybe not—by all appearances, his prior service as a Union general from 1861-63 was not impressive.
As for a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery, Lincoln had an endorsement for such an amendment incorporated into the party platform at the Baltimore convention in June. That being the case, I don’t see how it would figure into the deal worked out behind the scenes with Fremont in late August-early September.
Gary Graham!! Whenever I see his pic I think of that show. Actually, I've never seen the show, just the movie. Always wanted to see the show! I hope they do remake it.
Nature allows two outcomes for bees or ants without a queen:
1) Slow and heartbreaking death of the entire colony
2) The colony has a well-protected contingent of unfertilized "ladies in waiting" to take over if the queen dies
Neither bees nor ants build starships, but if they could I'd imagine their intellect to be advanced enough to plan for outcome #2.
The general theme of the movie is taking Europeans "to task" over imperialistic colonization and inherent racism–wrapped in a B-movie sci-fi exoskeleton. To me, framing "District 9" as an action packed anti-collectivist parable is like claiming "Air Force One" was made at the height of the Clinton Era to take the President "to task" over his weakness in dealing with global terrorism… the writers/producers/directors/stars all made "Air Force One" to show how AWESOMELY AWESOME our handsome and resourceful President would handle an immenent threat to his family and the USA.
Interesting take. On a side note, I've read a couple of those sub-par novels written that are supposed to take place between episodes, and I remember a passage from one dealing with the Clone Wars, in which Palpatine defends the idea of a "living" constitution as better suited to meet new circumstances; which, as we all know, was an excuse to accumulate more power. That made me think all this is a bit more complex than it appears. Of course, other people wrote those books, not Lucas, so maybe not.
Which line, "If you're not with me, then you're my enemy"?
I do think Episode III was a very good movie, Episode I was okay and Episode II was just awful. Except for Anakin's fall from grace at the end, I found him a lot less interesting than the Chancellor's scheming.
Switching media types is a style-over-substance gimmick–not a subtle plot device.
Maybe those cheap gimmicks were better apprecated at your two-year video production trade school, but those of us that graduated from a real film school were taught differently.
and how, pray tell, is czar Obama's word? Its been in use (politically, in this usage) for decades in America.
"that's Obama's word" = more right wing hogwash.
This review and the comments are hysterical! You guys are too much! I guess since William F Buckley died, there's nobody but the morons left in the far right.
Where to begin. Ok, you're forgetting about the all black gang that exploits the aliens and even eats their body parts. Second, I felt that by starting out as a documentary and then starting the narrative it made you feel like what you were watching was real. And I think that was the point.
Third, they made a point of saying that this was a ship full of low level "worker" type aliens which would explain why they didn't rise up and didn't know what to do when they ran into trouble. They just sat there in their ship. Fourth, they don't "enjoy" causing trouble. We see our hero exhibit the same behavior and we see it as a matter of survival and gain a deeper understanding.
Lastly, why can the humans and aliens understand each other? Because it's a movie. How can the ship hover there? Because it's a sci-fi movie.
I also think it was intentional that they never explained why they came. I do like how they raised a question at the end, "Will they come back and declare war on us?" Sometimes writers and directors like to let the audience answer some questions for themselves individually.
FYI: Not true. There is an all black gang that exploits the hell out of the aliens and even eats their body parts because they think they'll be able to "gain there power" and be able to operate their weapons. I don't know how this was left out of the review. The gang plays a big part in the movie.
Note: Eating someone's body parts to gain there power is not a shot at the western world.
dodged WHAT question?
Do I think that anyone that questions Furher Obama should be sent to the gas chamber?
NO!
Firing squad? Nope.
Drawn and quartered? Nope again.
Iron Maiden?! Sorry not a metal fan.
The truth is that I fully support your right to be a total a-hole and dissent anything you want.
The inherent efficiency (Adam Smith would even say "morality") of a market-based economy:
IN THE MOVIE: The big evil corporation is paid to move the aliens but are actually more concerned with stealing the alien technology to sell for a profit to the highest bidder–including the Nigerian warlord because "it's just business" to the MNU. The MNU is completely rogue, has no accountability to shareholders or the public, and maintains a brutal private military force to silence anyone that finds out their secret plans for monopolizing the alien technology.
IN REAL LIFE: After several minutes of the South African government screaming "OMG! WTF!" into the red phone, the United Nations and the UNDP are called in to manage the incredibly expensive job babysitting the alien ship. Funding is provided mostly by American tax dollars. When a team of top scientists privately funded by the National Geographic Channel asks to board the ship for a TV special, they are rebuked by the UN and the Nobel Committee. The UN complains to the media about NatGeo's exploitative profit motives. Reuters, AFP, and CNN all dig into the scientists' pasts for dirt. People forget about learning anything from the spaceship.
They are. I think SyFy is doing it. And if they are smart, they'll hire BHs Gary Graham in a role.
AN (both the movie and TV show) were brilliant. D9 is just left wing international fantasy.
I like action movies. I like SciFi with a twist that makes me pay attention and figure out things for myself. I think I will see this one and skip GI Schmoe now nicknamed 'Tin Men From the ICAN'.
Ha ha! You're correct, and actually I am, too.
Mandalorians are human.
And they're hott!
But I I *meant* to type Romulans.
I agree the prequels (i refuse to call them 1, 2 or 3) were so overt and heavy handed that they're almost unwatchable. My point is that even when someone like Lucas goes out of his way to try to bash the Right, they end up bashing Leftism; the idea that total control will guarantee peace.
And let us not forget Obama's role in creating the subprime bubble from his days as a lawyer to the Senate where he consistently blocked regulation. So he creates a crisis with the other Statists, then steps in to save the day.
There's an old saying, Crisis is the friend of the State. Crisis has historically been used to consolidate power. Crisis is Obama's middle name.
And how about Terri Treas and Michele Scarabeli, who were in this movie back when it was called Alien Nation?
And yes I know they were in the TV show.
I just saw the movie and I enjoyed it, also. Yes, I believe it had a definate apartheid theme. That being said, The internment could be any of us, not just blacks. Our right-wing view appears to be alien to the leftists. Think FEMA camps <snicker> and the Army/National Guard job postings for Internmemt/Resettlement Specialist…
Wow. Incredibly offbase.
1. The aliens look almost nothing like the Predator. They have eyes, I guess. That's where the similarity ends.
2. Does everything – no matter how incidental to the plot – have to be spelled out for you? You probably griped at the end. (SPOILERS) "But, but, we didn't get to see if he ever returned after three years! And it didn't spell out if that was really Wikus! And how do we know he left the flower?"
3. The "impossible documentary" scenes aren't documentary scenes at all. They're just shakycam. This one's somewhat understandable if one isn't paying attention, since the film switches from mockumentary to standard film without much transition.
4. Scoring points off apartheid? Every black with the exception of Wikus' assistant is shown in a bad light. The Nigerians are completely inhuman and disgusting. The movie went well out of its way to show that violence, betrayal, and evil lurks in the heart of every character in it.
Also, giving away the twist of Wikus' transformation without a spoiler warning? Just wrong.
you rank I better than II and both better than III?
okay, well I think exactly opposite of you.
Well since your fully exploiting your right to be a total a-hole that's nice. So we agree that liberals are hypocrites for screaming that we they did for 8 years is now not all right since it's being done to them.
As opposed to mental giants such as "I can't say good morning without a teleprompter" Obama and Joe Biden? Face it you liberals are in for a long 4 years, if Obama doesn't get impeached first.
If I remember correctly, the alien ship in Aruthr C. Clarke's book "Childhood's End", also hovered above for quite some time.
I saw this today and really liked it. Yes there is a vein of "apartheid sucks," but the movie itself is much more than that. NO ONE is a good guy. The closest we get to good guys are Wikus and Christopher, however that's left up to debate. Christopher is sympathetic and says he just wants to save his people, but how will he do that? Will he just come back and pick them up and leave, or will he come back and blow up Earth? Did Wikus do the noble thing and save the sympathetic aliens from exploitation by MNU, or did he inadvertantly doom Earth out of a selfish desire to save himself from becoming "one of the prawns." The mercenaries are jerks, the Nigerian gangsters are jerks, and the aliens are jerks, there really isn't one "good" group out of the major factions in the movie.
I really loved the ambiguous ending because you find yourself rooting for Wikus and Christopher, but then you're left to wonder about what will happen next.
It should also be pointed out that Lincoln was by no means opposed to the idea of granting full rights to freed slaves. But being the practical, pragmatic politician that he was, he didn’t push for it fast enough or with sufficient enthusiasm to suit the Radicals, as it would turn out. The fact is, Lincoln was operating under some considerable political constraints, and he did the best he could under those very difficult circumstances. And so I think that your intimation that Lincoln was some kind of “sell-out” is hardly reasonable or fair.
I saw this today and really liked it. Yes there is a vein of "apartheid sucks," but the movie itself is much more than that. NO ONE is a good guy. The closest we get to good guys are Wikus and Christopher, however that's left up to debate. Christopher is sympathetic and says he just wants to save his people, but how will he do that? Will he just come back and pick them up and leave, or will he come back and blow up Earth? Did Wikus do the noble thing and save the sympathetic aliens from exploitation by MNU, or did he inadvertantly doom Earth out of a selfish desire to save himself from becoming "one of the prawns." The mercenaries are jerks, the Nigerian gangsters are jerks, and the aliens are jerks, there really isn't one "good" group out of the major factions in the movie.
RIGHT ON! Ha…. sarcasm dead on my friend
This is a shame. Sci-Fi movies as a genre are home runs for Conservatism. We just need to see the forest through all the trees.
Just look at the picture above. Both races holding hands. Doesn't it reek of condescending political correctness? Don't you think that's the point?
"And how come, with perhaps the exception of E.T.. – who was still hardly a beauty queen – all film aliens are the ugliest creatures imaginable?"
Don't forget "The Day The Earth Stood Still." Michael Rennie as an alien in the original, Keanu Reeves as an alien in the remake. And how about those green-skinned babes Captain Kirk was always hitting on? (Okay, that was TV. Still …)
It depresses me that all this guy has to do is troll around the internet ripping on artistic movies. I personally felt some things were left unanswered, mainly the mysterious ability of humans to understand alien and the aliens likewise, but seriously, it was clearly designed for a sequel, so you can't have everything. I really doubt that he actually watched the thing with any attention, and if he did… well, that's much more pathetic.
In actuality, after seeing the movie, I'm not even sure that apartheid is an entirely appropriate metaphor for the film. Obviously there are elements of it, the shanty towns, etc. But it doesn't play a huge role in the story for the most part.
I didn't think it was terribly propagandistic at all. I mean obviously there's the bad PMC and corporation, but it's not a generalized attack on all PMCs and all corporations.
Certainly not leftist agit-prop, but not exactly conservative film making.
The inherent efficiency (Adam Smith would even say "morality") of a market-based economy:
IN THE MOVIE: The big evil corporation is paid to move the aliens but are actually more concerned with stealing the alien technology to sell for a profit to the highest bidder–including the Nigerian warlord because "it's just business" to the MNU. The MNU is completely rogue, has no accountability to shareholders or the public, and maintains a brutal private military force to silence anyone that finds out their secret plans for monopolizing the alien technology.
IN REAL LIFE: After several minutes of the South African government screaming "OMG! WTF!" into the red phone, the United Nations and the UNDP are called in to manage the incredibly expensive job babysitting the alien ship. Funding is provided mostly by American tax dollars. When a team of top scientists privately funded by the National Geographic Channel asks to board the ship for a TV special, they are rebuked by the UN and the Nobel Committee. The UN complains to the media about NatGeo's exploitative profit motives. Reuters, AFP, and CNN all dig into the scientists' pasts for dirt. The majority of people polled in 28 countries can tell you the names of any 3 disgraced scientists but cannot tell you anything about why there's a big spaceship hovering over a major city (the same majority also cannot remember the name of city in South Africa that the spaceship is located).
Wow, I honestly can't tell if this review is a satire. Poe's law strikes again. If not, please re-watch the movie to pick up on everything you missed. All your questions either are answered or don't need to be. Let me address the most egregious: the fakumentary introduction cuts off in the first 15 minutes when he takes off his microphone. After that it's normal movie action, where the camera doesn't really exist, that occasionally cuts to news footage or after-the-fact interviews to giver perspective. The transitions are extremely clear to anyone who understands that simple concept.
Err…might want to watch the film. It's far from PC-101, in fact, nearly every character (including the aliens) in this film is an unqualified bastard. As many have said on here already, it takes shots at everyone. Doesn't mean there aren't legitimate criticisms of the film, but that it's politically correct drivel is not one of them.
Fire. Doesn't. Melt. Steel!
So, I just saw the film 2 hours ago. This guy didn't quite get it right. Sorry. The whole "racial undertone" thing is way over-played in this article. I can remember one scene/line that caused my mind to go in that direction (even with me reading this article before watching the movie).
The story was good, the acting was good, the CG was incredible (the aliens are especially brilliantly done-even if they are ugly) but for some reason, I just didn't like it.
As the move was drawing to a close I kept thinking, I can't believe this wasn't a game first. Or, this would make a great game. Maybe I play too much xbox, or watch my boyfriend, brother, and dad play too much xbox… but, I think this would have been better as a game than a movie. Anyone agree??
The gore was a little over-the-top for me (and I'm an action-flick kinda gal) – borderline Saving Private Ryan level…
My final thought is that I hope Notle does a review of this. I always like his reviews.
No the dumbest thing ever is someone who trolls this site all the time and blasts conservatives all the time and calls people who question Obama right wing hate mobs but when asked if people have the right to protest in the same way he and other liberals did for the last 8 years suddenly becomes all enlightened and starts taking about how petty all this is. Bottom line your on the recieving end of your own behavior and don't like it but still whine about how it's not fair..now that's dumb.
what did we do to you for 8 years that you are doing to us, that's not right? Call Bush Hitler?
I don't have a problem with someone calling Bush or Obama Hitler…other than the person saying such things is making a fool of themselves.
The only thing dumber than that is someone operating on a political philosophy of "revenge". E.g. "we're gonna show you what it feels like since you did it to us." I mean, that's about the dumbest thing ever, don't you think?
"That blacks and whites in South Africa deserve equal 'sympathy' on the mere basis of a political change 15 years ago? Or that South African blacks — 27.9 percent of whom are unemployed, nearly seven times the rate of jobless whites according to recent government statistics — aren’t at the type of social disadvantage alluded to allegorically in District 9? Were centuries of social order reversed in the time since Blomkamp relocated to Vancouver 11 years ago?"
Yeah, shifting the rule of a colony to form a functioning, orderly, and relatively prosperous nation is completely impossible in something as short as one or two generations. It's just not possible for "centuries of social order" to be reversed in less than 20 years… well, unless you count the American Revolution (1775-1787).
Oh, and the historical scholars at Movieline were unaware of the fact that the "political change" in South Africa was brought about by decades of violence (and untold civilian deaths) sponsored by African National Congress (ANC) and the South African Communist Party.
"Schooled" indeed.
It's not like most blockbusters these days don't have some political point to hammer home. I think we are used to that already. I'm still going to see this.
If you watched the movie, you'd know why they were stuck.
Yes, there are apartheid similarities, but it's not whites vs. aliens. The blacks treat the aliens like crap too.
The reviewer is clearly an idiot who wasn't paying attention. The film explains how they got there, and explains why they're stuck.
Not everything is "liberalist agenda". Honestly, that's just pathetic.
Yeah, it's awful when a good filmmaker produces a quality film. I'd much reather watch Transformers 2 – inferior special effects for 7 times the cost to make! YUS!
Oh, wank wank Carl. Get over yourself!
Stop ranting, pandax. You sound like an idiot.
Not every film has miagical links to your American government. Not every film has some secret left/right agenda. Lefts hate Bush, rights hate Obama. Fine. But at least lefts weren't pathetic enough to insist that Bush wasn't born in America, like you're doing to Obama!
I'm right wing in my country, but your Republican party has a lot of junk to sort out. If I was American I'd stay the heck away from the Republican party, it's full of nutbars. Bush was an idiot, everyone knows that. He was a mindless bobble-head for nasty men who had drifted far from the true right-wing ideals.
Your country is not Star Wars. Star Wars is junk anyway.
Err…I'm not entirely sure we watched the same movie. First, I acknowledge that MNU was the bad guy. But I think it's a huge leap to say that Blomkamp was attacking MNU (whose forces had lots of light blue helmets and armbands, lets not forget) because it's a corporation; MNU was doing lots of unethical things, for which it deserved, rightfully, to be condemned. That link was never made in the film, nor at any point by any of the in-film commentators. MNU has some 'good' guys, and lots of bad, but no one in this film gets away clean. I don't think that's a legitimate criticism of the film, of which I admit there are a few.
Chris Lee reporting in the Chicago Tribune's Entertainment section on 8/11/09:
Writer-director Neill Blomkamp grew up in Johannesburg during an era of white minority rule; later, memories of the apartheid government's social divisiveness and authoritarian control became "the most powerful influence" in shaping his creative vision.
"It all had a huge impact on me: the white government and the paramilitary police — the oppressive, iron-fisted military environment," Blomkamp said over breakfast recently in a Santa Monica hotel. "Blacks, for the most part, were kept separate from whites. And where there was overlap, there were very clearly delineated hierarchies of where people were allowed to go.
"Those ideas wound up in every pixel in 'District 9.' " [emphasis added]
JM, thank you for the response. I was a bit worried that there might be some kind of sucker punch in the film, and from what I gather in your comment that that isn't there.
I entirely acknowledge that a creator can produce a work that was inspired entirely by his or her ideological perspective, and yet that same work uncovers a Truth that lies beneath that ideology. An example I always use is Neil Gaiman's short story, "Babycakes." I haven't seen District 9 yet so I can't say that that's Blomkamp does, but if what you say is accurate than perhaps he comes close.
who the heck is whining? I don't care about "fair" in political dialog. EIther we make our points well or we don't. Try all you like, you can't pin me to any liberals you think are out there that are complaining about comparing Obama to Hitler. (From what I've read, the most offended people out there are IDL groups who voiced their same offense back when the Bush = Hitler stuff occured.)
So seriously be my guest. Compare Obama to Hitler, Stalin, etc. Work it baby! Push that notion that the US is under threat to be socialist totalitarian states like… the UK and Canada and Nazi Germany, with Death Panels and Gas Chambers and widely popular NHS services. Yes, keep hopping on that. See where it gets you.
Quote from an interview on Salon (Link = http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2009/...
"There's no message, per se, that I'm trying to get across with the movie. It's rather that I want to present science fiction, and put it in the environment that affected me. In the process, maybe I highlight all the topics that interest me, but I'm not giving any answers. You can take from it what you will."
Quote from an interview on Salon (Link = http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/btm/feature/2009/...
"There's no message, per se, that I'm trying to get across with the movie. It's rather that I want to present science fiction, and put it in the environment that affected me. In the process, maybe I highlight all the topics that interest me, but I'm not giving any answers. You can take from it what you will."
Lily
Maybe George Lucas actually said those things? Not like the liberals ever accused Bush of anything like I don't know..staging 9/11? It's funny how you exactly prove my point. You scream about Bush and then totally ignore how Obama is clearly one our most inept presidents ever. The last comment proves what fool you are. Go back to worshipping Obama with the rest of the other liberal morons, that is until 2012 or until he's impeached.
Your doing quite the dance? Every time I ask the question you go off into this Hilter thing. So I'll make the question very specific. Do you think it was right for Speaker Pelosi to write an op-ed piece calling people who disagree with her un-American?.
Your last part is really funny. It shows the total blindness of liberals. For the last 8 years liberals smeared Bush in every way possible and degraded American troops as war criminals and undermined America at every turn. Hey you guys won the election, so it worked. Thanks for letting us know how to win, undermine the president at every turn and protest everything. Check the poll numbers lately? It's getting us somewhere, see you in 2010.
"I think it's a huge leap to say that Blomkamp was attacking MNU (whose forces had lots of light blue helmets and armbands, lets not forget) because it's a corporation"
Respectfully disagree. It's not a huge leap to say that MNU is a stand-in for leftist perceptions of e-e-evil corporations in this story because the writer/director specifies that the MNU is a "corporation" whose motives are:
1) Relocate the aliens for a profit
2) Use this opportunity to confiscate alien property in order to reverse engineer and sell their weapons to the highest bidder
The MNU also spends a big chunk of the movie (and therefore in the real world would also be spending a lot of money) chasing down one of their own employees to dissect him in order to help them sell alien weapons–probably to the Nigerian warlord if he doesn't eat the guy's arm first.
If the writer/director wanted to highlight the rampant nepotism, hypocrisy, and venal nature of the UN, then he would've just said it was the UN rather than the "MNU"
Wait! I haven't seen the film yet, but even reading about it here, the truth is so obvious!
The aliens aren't stand-ins for Africans!
They're stand-ins for Israelis!
Come on, don't you see? Cast-offs from a more advanced civilization, surrounded by predatory monsters, with their one ace in the hole the superior military technology they've brought into the game.
Or maybe it's just just a damn movie which reflects the culture its creator was raised in. Whatever.
Oh, he was kidding? I thought we had a live Obamabot here.
The aliens aren't stand-ins for Africans!
They're stand-ins for Israelis!
Actually, I think they're a metaphor for the Afrikaaners, despised and casually murdered as they are while being used to keep the country (sort-of) running. The fact that their most visible antagonist is "Multi-National United" (recalling the "United Nations" and its long antagonism to Apartheid South Africa) seems rather on-the-nose.
I saw this movie today and thought it was terrible. I mean, come on…the same fluid that is used to power a shuttlecraft somehow also has the ability to genetically alter a human, turning him into an alien? And, I was disappointed to see that, except for a passing reference to human rights activists, there appeared to be no one with a moral quandary about the goings on either with the aliens or the attempted operation-murder of our hero. Working for a great big corporation, I know that any sort of morally inappropriate happening is not a secret 4 nanoseconds after it occurs. The problem with movies like this is that they devolve into one long chase scene, and the alien scenario just becomes a backdrop to a series of wildly-improbable action sequences. Good sci-fi needs a cerebral element to it; this movie had none of that.
yawn
There were at least 6 people at my screening that walked out before the 30 minute mark and judging from those exiting at the end not much enthusiasm for the film. If this is an indication of what film critics say a summer popcorn picture should be like then I suppose more people will be doing other things for their escapism during the summer than seeing borefest such as these. From where I sat I was enthused about this film as much as I was about GI JOe. Oh, maybe I am not sophisticated and intelligent enough. LOL.
It is now Sunday and District 9 is making a lot of money for a low budget sci fi flick. Leaving aside the debate about political meaning, I think it shows again that audiences are looking for something different, fresh. And the trailer certainly gave me that vibe.
Of course a guy who never held any responsibility, never crafted a single piece of legialsation, is likely to be ineffective. Of course a guy whose only tangible achievement at 47 is the writing of 2 (two!) autobiographies is a tad self-centered and out of touch. Conservatives pointed this out last year. Even so, he has already done more than enough damage. The reasons why we need him to fail have muliplied since January 20th.
For all of Rahm's reputation of a Congressional task master, we have yet to see it.
By your own logic, we should be grateful for that.
You're really trying to draw a line of moral equivalence between the ANC and the SACP and the white, Afrikaner apartheid government? That's kind of ridiculously laughable. I'm sorry, but if you lived for a day under apartheid conditions, you probably would take up arms and fight for your freedom in any way possible within 45 seconds. Before being so judgmental against the South African resistance, go to Johannesburg, go to Soweto, go to District 6, and see why the ANC and SACP were, at least in this one isolated case, on the right side of history.
Either you are saying there are no rich conservatives, or there are none that have enough power to make things happen. Besides, one of the points of this blog is that these are Hollywood insiders (or former) who are making political statements.
This was quite possibly the worst review of a film I have ever read. Half of what is written in it is just wrong, the other half is so poorly conceived I can't even begin to counter such abject stupidity. I can only imagine what sort of film this writer does like… Paul Blart Mall Cop perhaps?
The so-called freedoms promised by the ANC/SACP rule has resulted in no measurable difference in overall quality of life (high unemployment, rampant thefts and murders, few opportunities for advancement of workers unless they are connected to government officials, etc.) for anyone in Joburg, Sowteo, and Cape Town 15 years… that's why Neil Blomkamp's parents ran to Canada.
It's laughable for you to believe the corrupt and violent ANC is not to blame for South Africa's living conditions now. The immoral and stupid rulers they had under aparteid are long gone.
District 9 was a effin' great movie. Too PC!??? It's actually the first movie that includes all people in the film's ugliness. No one is spared in this flick. Had the film been set, as it was, in South Africa with only the white guys as the villains, then maybe you'd have a righteous complaint. But there is bravery in making everyone the villain – beauracratic white guys, Nigerian voodoo dudes, an indian woman asking for the Prawns relocation. WTF movie were you watching!? For once this was a film where people were portrayed as being "all too human". Not by race, but by species. That's progress.
I don't deny that the ANC hasn't exactly set people's hearts afire with its management of the country, but what exactly is your point? That despite being deprived of economic opportunity, education, housing, health, or anything else you'd consider humane, the majority black population in South Africa was supposed to magically solve all problems with a special wand? Apartheid was nothing short of human exploitation. Recovering from that does take decades, especially considering South Africa is trying to do through organic economic growth. Additionally, the parallel between the Americans from 1776 to 1787 and any other post-colonial period is just flat out wrong. The Americans were largely self-ruling before the Revolution and were in one of the most prosperous and bountiful lands in the world. There wasn't any degree of self-rule in South Africa or any of the modern colonial regimes before true independence, which I think negates your historical analogy.
Putting that aside, though, what's your point? You're not really trying to defend the Afrikaner apartheid government, are you? I mean, I thought it was somewhat clear that the South Africans fighting apartheid were on the right side of history. They were morally, generally speaking, right. So if you're not defending apartheid, are you saying "shame on Hollywood for making a movie that touches on apartheid issues," ignoring that the movie is by a South African about the most scarring part of his own personal political history? What's your point?
There is nothing remotely leftist about this film. It is politically neutral. It's not political to say that forced internment and abuse are evil.
I mean come on, we got rid of racism 5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40 years ago…!
I think you're confused. It is clearly explained that the control module ship detached from the mothership once the mothership began hovering overhead. This is the 'piece' that is buried. Yes, the language point it unjustified most of the rest of the 'story' is incredibly silly.
I agree the aliens look nothing like the Predator character but…since Predator, it seems that the majority of aliens – and that clearly includes those in D9 – are based on crustacean morphology. It's getting really lazy.
If you forgive the chintzy storytelling because "it was clearly designed for a sequel" does that mean you support me in asking for half my money back?
Personally, and I know I will get hammered for this, the overwhelming point of it all was that the aliens were Mexicans and Muslims, and in the final scenes when one of the interviewees says the aliens had increased in number from 1.8 million to 2.7 million and were living under even worse conditions all I could think was what an incredibly bone headed move it was to let your country – America or Europe – become a nest to an obviously god awful mess that would be spilling out just around the corner. A cautionary tale indeed but I doubt that was D9's intention.
As a movie reviewer, you really, REALLY screwed this review up. Seriously – I don't even know where to start.
If you think the whole move was filmed documentary style, like the Office with camera crews following the main character around, then STOP REVIEWING MOVIES. You clearly have the observational powers of a six-year-old. The documentary film is woven into the main story here and there at the start and end of the movie, but the vast majority of the film is shot as a traditional movie, albeit with the contemporary shaky-camera work seen in most action/horror films today.
Another thing: it is common in science fiction that two species will communicate via their own language, which both species have to learn. This is because, such as in this case, it would be difficult if not impossible for humans to master the clicky sound of the alien vocal chords. Try doing a perfect imitation of a cicada – oh wait you can't. You don't have the equipment in your throat to do it. Same for the aliens… they cannot make human sounds, so the ideal is for humans to learn to understand the aliens and the aliens to understand the humans.
Your other comments: floating ships, lawsuits over aliens… give me a break. I'm done. Seriously, think before you review. You are a shame to Big Hollywood.
Syfy will ruin the series like they have done so many times before. Farscape is a prime example.
Of course a guy who never held any responsibility, never crafted a single piece of legislation, is likely to be ineffective. Of course a guy whose only tangible achievement at 47 is the writing of 2 (two!) autobiographies is a tad self-centered and out of touch. Conservatives pointed this out last year. Even so, he has already done more than enough damage. The reasons why we need him to fail have muliplied since January 20th.
"For all of Rahm's reputation of a Congressional task master, we have yet to see it."
By your own logic, we should be grateful for that.
what about Raquel Welch's daughter in Cocoon 1 or 2? She was hot…
I thought the movie was very good. My only complaints(which isnt really a complaint) was they showed the clip of the alien battle suit catching the rocket shot at the ship, I liked it-but i knew it was coming, I wish it was a suprise. However that small scene was an "ohh this movie looks, i want to see this" to the viewer. so i understand why they put it in the trailer, other then that it was fantastic and i enjoy that they left alot of questions unanswered, that's what imagination is for.
You're incredibly racist suggesting only white American farmers that lived two centuries ago have the intelligence and drive to self-govern immediately after colonial rule but native South Africans are inherently unable to govern themselves in their own prosperous and bountiful land using all of the modern pre-built financial, transport, communication, and legal infrastructure available to them since 1994.
It's a horribly racist worldview that you have, but if that's what you truly believe then nothing any of us on the other side of the issue can say will change your mind.
When you watch a documentary about a social issue do you become angry when the film doesn't explain how someone's car works? How about if someone's car radio works, while the engine won't run? The humans had access to Alien technology, sure, but after 20 years of research they were still only scratching the surface with weaponry. Analyzing more tech is yet to come. Maybe the ship was designed in such a way that allowed it to hover with little or no fuel, and the reason we don't understand its design is because of the lack of omniscient narration… kind of like real life.
p.s. Magnets… eh?
Helen, hilarious – i'm trolling around the Internet looking for artistic movies to rip on?? This is the only remotely bad review i've given, because i mostly have the common sense to avoid crap i'm gonna hate. And even here i point out that the movie's a helluva ride, but one that doesn't hold up later in my book. Trolling? Ha
What a stupid review. You insist on trying to pervert the film into an attack on you as a white man, when the film clearly depicts all humans as complex, sometimes stupid, sometimes heroic. And to say that the aliens represent blacks is stunningly insipid, especially since many of the people who either fear or exploit the aliens are black humans.
The film was a great disappointment.
I expected a lot but it only turned out to be an irritating camera-shaking videogame. The plot-line was ridiculous and had great holes.
The biggest crap in 2009!!!
It’s time writers should read more traditional literature to create strong storylines. Not silly, mindless violent cinematic video-games.
You must be logged in to post a comment.