Between D*ck Jokes, Judd Apatow Upholds Traditional Values
by Carl KozlowskiQuick! Think fast – who’s making the most morally conservative films in Hollywood?
The answer may surprise you, but it’s none other than Judd Apatow. Yes, the writer-director of “The 40 Year Old Virgin,” “Knocked Up” and the new film “Funny People” might have a reputation for creating profanity-filled R-rated raunch, but in reality they’re actually films that uphold traditional values. And the fact that Apatow sneaks messages that are pro-life in “Knocked Up,” anti-promiscuity in “The 40 Year Old Virgin” and (SPOILER ALERT) upholds marriage against the temptation and forgiveness of infidelity in “Funny People” under the surface of all the dirty talk, means that he’s found a way to preach to far more than the usual choir and spread positive moral messages to those who might otherwise never choose to hear them.
I remember the night I first walked in to see “Virgin” back in 2005. I thought that it would just be one big sex comedy poking fun at the titular character. But as written by Apatow and the film’s star, Steve Carell, the film actually turned every convention one might have expected upside down.
Carell’s Andy had the “problem” of being a 40 year-old virgin, but after initally laughing at him and trying to get him laid, Andy’s co-worker friends slowly start to respect him. One who brags about cheating on his girlfriends winds up turning monogamous when he sees his impending baby on an ultrasound, while another may find his perfect match with a kinky gal but by the end it’s true love nonetheless.
More pertinently, Andy’s journey into true love with a divorced mom played by Catherine Keener involves him hiding his sexual neophyte status by challenging her to have 20 dates together before they have sex. She finds it unusual, but as a cute montage winds up showing, the film shows that getting to know each other well is more important to a healthy long-term relationship than casual sex.
Along the way, the film also takes sharply pointed stabs at our sexually saturated culture, both in a scene where Andy tries to run from a giant bus ad featuring a couple in the throes of passion only to stumble across other sexual images everywhere else around him, and in a particularly strong scene that takes dead aim at how Planned Parenthood-style clinics would rather push an anything-goes-with-a-condom message at teens than to encourage abstinence.
Ultimately, Andy and his beloved wait until after they’re married to have their first joyous moments of ecstasy together, and he’s so happy by the end result that he and the entire cast burst into a surreally funny dance routine to the strains of the giddy hippie classic “The Age of Aquarius.” And the movie broke both Carell and Apatow into the mainstream bigtime by scoring $120 million in the US alone, with my opening-night audience walking out at the end in excited discussions about the film‘s refreshingly different attitudes.
How many other films with those kinds of messages would have been played outside of a religious event?
Leap forward two years, and Apatow took on unplanned pregnancy in “Knocked Up,” where a stoned slacker played by Seth Rogen impregnates an ambitious young TV personality played by Katherine Heigl during a one-night stand. Heigl’s character’s mother tells her not to blow her new on-camera career and that she can have a “real” baby later – and that moment is what propels her to keep her baby and sets the movie on its exploration of how the stoned dude is ruining his life with his irresponsibility and shows him the joys of putting down the bong and picking up a relationship.
Apatow took some heat for the film’s stance on abortion, with the liberal newspaper LA Weekly grilling him about the scene between Heigl and her mother. The Weekly writer asked him why he took the pro-life route and compared his film to the Romanian drama “4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days,” which depicts a woman’s search for an illegal abortion in the former Communist nation. Apatow pointed out that if an abortion had occurred, “Knocked Up” would have been 15 minutes long and that while there’s a place for “4 Weeks” in the market, he doesn’t have to make a film that way.
“Knocked Up” even took a strong whack at the stoner lifestyle, as Rogen’s character has to learn to put away the pot and get a job in order to step up and truly be a good man for Heigl and their baby. As the LA Weekly noted in a Scott Foundas article on the film:
That extends to the film’s laissez-faire depiction of drug use and alcohol consumption – a subject about which Apatow has mixed feelings. He is himself strongly anti-drug, he says, “but at the same time, as a filmmaker, I just need to show things exactly as they are. I hope, on some level, I’m indicating to the audience: You probably shouldn’t do this, that you can’t be the high guy when the earthquake happens and you have to figure out how to shut off the gas.”
And now we have “Funny People,” which doesn’t directly address a moral quandary in its title, but which explores the attitude of entitlement some people have in which they think they can pursue whomever they want romantically, damn the consequences. When Adam Sandler’s lead character, superstar comic George Simmons, overcomes a bout with cancer (I didn’t spoil it – that’s revealed in the trailer) he sets out to get the Girl Who Got Away, not caring at first that she’s now married to another guy and has kids.
(SPOILER ALERT) Simmons does have a quickie with his dream woman, but ultimately he comes to realize that her husband isn’t a jerk and his dream girl and her husband opt to forgive each other and stay together, while Simmons walks out of their way.
Once again, marriage is upheld as the ideal and traditional values win. The fact that the film’s packed with dick jokes still doesn’t change that, and helps lead people who might be looking for a naughty night out at the movies to have a morally sound one as well.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
37 Comments
Good observations Carl- and let all the Libertarian/Jeffersonian/Conservative aspiring writers take a lesson from Apatow: politics and worldview can inform the storyline but any story that spoon feeds politics or self-consciously forces an abstract point of view on the audience becomes instantly B-O-R-I-N-G . . .
Exactly right.
I'm wondering if you write your own banner headlines. The only reason I bring it up is I always thought sophomoric d*ck jokes were a critical part of traditional adolescent values.
I have a love/hate relationship with the Apatow films. On the surface, the vulgarity always makes me cringe but I ended up enjoying the final product without not really knowing why.
Stop it. Stop it. Stop rooting through turds to find rhinestones in this Apatow twaddle. And please don't tell me again and again and again how juvenile, witless pseudotainment is anything but head-candy for arrested mentalities.
Really, all I want is a "quickie with (my) dream woman". But somehow I suspect that Mrs. OT wouldn't be quite as liberal-minded as Katherine Heigl. I'm pretty sure that Katherine Heigl wouldn't be quite as liberal minded if she were working without a script.
I'm not sure if these films represent moral relativism or just wishful thinking.
Right on. The reason I hung in there for Funny People through the early onslaught of vulgarity was not only the moment-to-moment sense of actual "human comedy," a spirit all but gone from American cinema, but the sense of a moral core. Apatow has the makings of a post-modern Preston Sturges; I think he's got a great and original American movie in him somewhere. As for the vulgarity, I wonder if Apatow can't help himself, or thinks this it is necessary to box office, or has some Woody Allen self-loathing drive to repel people at the same time he's trying to seduce them. I'd love to ask him.
This has been a pretty obvious recurring theme in Apatow's work, to me. He escapes being labeled this way not because he's subtle but because he is real and the cultural gatekeepers and media establishment have such an emotionally-stunted and cartoonish notion of conservative "values" that they can't see what's staring them right in the face.
Part of the creative process – at least being any good at it – is being fresh, new and pushing boundaries. Because of the preponderance of left wingers in these fields this has pushed things in a direction that reflects their view of the world and as a result it has become worn, tired and infertile ground.
There's only so much new ground that can be broken. Even a show like Californication which casually pushes every conceivable boundary in creating the left wing intelligentsia's idealized version of an arrested adolescent values-free environment works so beautifully because implicit in it is how pathetic these people are. And that deep down they know it. It may be a message that is less intentional than in Apatow's work, but it is conservative nonetheless.
Lefties are running out of room to be creative by simply flattering one another as well. Which is probably why I could sort of enjoy American Beauty when it came out because it at least felt fresh, whereas by the time I saw Mendes's Revolutionary Road I was torn between laughing at it and thinking thank god left-wing messages geared towards flattering themselves have become so trite and mindless that they've reached the point of self-mockery. That's sort of a conservative message as well. And as long as they continue to hold a cartoon in their heads about what conservative values are I think that they will find all manner of ways to push things back in our direction, no matter how unwittingly.
old Tom said,"I'm not sure if these films represent moral relativism or just wishful thinking."
Tom, ALL movies represent wishful thinking.
Adding to the list of solid hidden/moralistic message movies in the Apatow universe: "Forgetting Sarah Marshall".
It's good on many levels.
The pity of the current state of movie-making standards in Hollywood is that all of the sexual and scatalogical content in Apatow's body of work is considered the acceptable, non-controversial element. The controversy and condemnation stems form the inclusion of messages (take responsibility for your decisions, life is not a disposable commodity, establishing an emotional relatioship before having sex) which are abhorrent to the Hollywood establishment.
Film makers are REQUIRED to include the raunch and crudity if they are to be considered "serious". It's the ethics of pre-adolescent idiots ruling the roost.
I think the OP is really grasping to say these movies represent conservatism. The fact that we are stretching so far to call Apatow's movies representative of any sort of values shows just how far our culture has fallen.
I really don't care if Apatow's movies are liberal, conservative, or neither. I just don't find them particularly funny.
I've been saying this since this site began. Successful films are all conservative in values at their core.
Similar take here, with a different conclusion at the end:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/opinion/10douth...
Almost makes you wonder if Apatow's political donations to Moveon.Org were more of a career move than how he feels politically.
I agree with the post. And I don't know why people get so hung up about cussing and a bit of juvenile scat humor. Seriously, 90%+ of the people curse, and almost everyone thinks a fart is funny. Can't these people be in or watch a movie with some important core moral validated?
Although it's pretty much unacceptable in the more prudish conservative circles to say this, but I've always liked Judd Apatow films.
I don't think some of these values – keeping a baby, love, marriage… necessarily belong to the conservative branch although the far left would have you believe otherwise. They're just good ol' values – that's all.
And as far as the vulgarity and what not – I think he's just tapping into my generation's language. Scary… but that's what we talk about when the "adults" aren't around.
Personally, I like some of Apatow's movies…if I laugh at it, then I laugh at it.
However, I think it's stretching it a bit to talk about the conservative values in some of these movies, though. To me, if there are real values being shown in these movies (or books, games, etc), then you shouldn't have to dig for them at all. If you have to dig to find some sort of moral or ethical values in movies, it's because the director or writers weren't exactly trying to point them out to begin with. And to me, not making these things apparent to begin with is the same thing as hiding them.
[...] Are Judd Apatow Movies morally conservative? [...]
Re: the vulgarity, I'm no prude but when it comes to Apatow, I kinda sorta agree with you. The man did Freaks and Geeks and Undeclared and The Larry Sanders Show (the characters cursed but never at the level of Apatow's films). I just wanna grab him by the shoulders and yell, "Okay, you've proven yourself on television! Now let's see if you can do a movie without characters saying f— every twenty seconds! Do you accept the challenge?!" I don't know why he keeps going down that road. Does he think that's what sells? Does he think that's what people expect of him now? Is he afraid of trying something new?
And good call on Sturges. I recently watched some of his films. I thought The Palm Beach Story was a hoot. And The Lady Eve… Barbara Stanwyck… need I say more?
And Sullivan's Travels ends with what has become one of my favorite lines (from memory): "You know, there's something to be said for making people laugh. Did you know that's all some people have? Sure it ain't much but it's better than nothing in this cockeyed caravan."
I've always seen it as comparable to putting a dog's pills in a piece of cheese. By hiding the moral of the story in dick and fart jokes he manages to, ever so subtly, influence the crowd that after-school specials never could.
For real. If my grandma could hear how I talk when I'm just with the guys….
"Caligula"?
Not sure I'm with you on that one.
Dude, there's no digging required. Knocked Up: the entire story is about taking personal responsiblility. 40 Year Old Virgin: entire story is about waiting for sex. Superbad: the bond of friendship. These are not subtle cues, they are the central storyline for these movies. Yes, there's a lot of raunch in there, but these themes are definately the 800lb gorilla in the room.
That "Knocked Up" would involve not choosing abortion is a given as the plot requires it. However, the subplot involving the irresponsible stoner learning to become an adult was certainly not a requirement and I very much appreciated it.
Also, I laughed a whole lot.
Right on. I'm at conservative gatherings and I stop and laugh to hear how much cursing is going on. Especially when talking about the current administration. But then again, half of us (not me) were Marines or sailors at one point.
I get your analogy, but I just can't agree. There may be some tiny silver lining at the end of his movies, but its hardly enough to make up for the previous 90 minutes of sleaze.
And I'm also one of those rare 25-30 year old conservatives, but I guess I have it easy living in Texas.
[...] I’ve made the same point on a few occasions, albeit only in my own mind: Quick! Think fast – who’s making the most morally conservative films in Hollywood? The answe… [...]
This reminds me of a quote from one of my favorite character actors, the late great Nicholas Worth, in regards to playing a sleazy serial killer on film.
"Some people at church said, 'How can you do this film, being a Christian?' And I said, 'We don't live in a Pollyanna society. God called upon me to act, and He calls in Christ to be truthful people, and I have to present the world as it is.' That pretty much ended their argument there."
Woops forgot "Sarah Marshall." Actually, that's my favorite one of Apatow's.
Thank you. Let's make everything as wholesome as "The Lawrence Welk Show," Texicon, and see how many people are influenced by the messages that Apatow espouses.
yes, people need to get off their high horses a little. I recommended "Julie & Julia' as a great movie for older audiences and I had people actually say 'no way' because of the ONE F word in the whole thing. Oh, and the fact that it was considered "Republican bashing" in the film to address the fact that Julia Child's husband was grilled by McCarthy's people for 5 or 10 minutes out of a 2 hour plus run time. It's SO much fun for some people to brag about how they won't spend a dime on an actor who has a different view than them. If the movie's good, the movie's good, people. "Julie & Julia" upholds traditional, straight marriage in a beautiful way, and not many movies do that these days. Go out and support it or quit complaining about the gay agenda in everything else Hollywood produces.
[...] PM – Between D*ck Jokes, Judd Apatow Upholds Traditional ValuesCould Judd Apatow be a conservative in sheep's clothing? – [...]
[...] Carl Kozlowski at Big Hollywood [...]
My point was just that when all that's advertised is raunch, d*ck jokes, and the pursuit of 'tang, there's admittedly a little digging involved because most of the audience isn't exactly going in for the strong "traditional" or moral themes in the movie…dude.
Ok, I can see where you're coming from.
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.