[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……

Besides, his role in A Time to Kill was off the charts. So, thanks Matthew!

The point of my post is that the right can sometimes be just as venemous in their hatred of differing opinions as the left. Our soldiers are not children, and as such they certainly understand that some people don't agree with the war. In fact, certainly many of our soldiers and sailors don't agree either – my best friend, a dedicated soldier, never agreed with the war. But he went as ordered, did his duty to the best of his ability, witnessed friends die, and was discharged himself for injuries received during his tour. Are these people arguing now that my friend didn't (and doesn't) support the troops?

If our soldiers and sailors in Iraq can have differing opinions on the war, why can't we civilians?

Thanks for your comments bet. That's it for me.

I'm not saying it's impossible to disagree with the war and at the same time, support the troops. What I am saying is that in this polarized environment, people lump them together. And my "argument" doesn't strengthen anything. It's nothing more than an explanation of behavior. So don't try to use it as evidence of Matthew McConaughey's politics (of which we have no knowledge-primarily because he's been decent enough not to cram it down our throats).

However, my stance that Matthew McConaughey is being political is only strengthened by your argument.

You see Paul, if these people actually supported the troops, they would care about the troops. But they don't. At least their actions don't bear that out. Generally they are more concerned about every other issue except the ones the troops are concerned about. In fact they have no idea what the troops want or need.