The Star-Mangled Banner
by Burt PrelutskyThere’s probably no single piece of writing in this country that’s as controversial or as likely to lead to fist fights as the U.S. Constitution. It’s difficult to decide which portion of the document gets people riled up the most. At times, it almost seems to change on a daily basis. On Monday, it could be gun ownership, with folks like Michael Moore frothing at the mouth at the mere thought that a law-abiding citizen might own a weapon. You’d think Moore was planning to burgle your home the way he frets over the possibility you might actually be armed.
On Tuesday, it could be the pointy-headed crowd at the ACLU that’s in full throttle, demanding that illegal aliens are entitled to all the rights and privileges of American citizens, not to mention a chicken in every pot.
But, as a rule, if you’re really in the mood to see blood spilled, take advantage of your right to free speech by taking a position on the first amendment. For instance, there are those who argue there should be absolutely no limits on free speech, even when it comes to pornography, blasphemy or sedition. For all I know, they might even object to libel and slander laws, seeing them as infringements on the people’s inalienable right to lie their heads off. These same zealots would probably object to the injunction against screaming “Fire!” in a crowded theater. To me, such an interpretation of the amendment is not only insane, but insulting to the fellows who hammered out the Constitution two centuries ago in Philadelphia. Whatever else Franklin, Madison, and the rest of the boys, may have been, they were not lunatics.
Every so often, you get word that Congress might pass a law making the burning of the flag illegal. Emotionally, as the son of Russian immigrants who came to this country in the hope of finding a better life, and discovered that reality for once exceeded even their wildest dreams, I can well understand the motivation. But I’m not sure I’d want to deny an American the right to burn a flag, so long as it’s not the one in front of my house, as I think his puny act of adolescent rebellion merely lets the rest of us know what a pitiful buffoon and pathetic ingrate he is.
Not being a constitutional scholar, I am naturally reluctant to become too embroiled in these matters. However, there is one thing about which I have a strong opinion, and I find it odd that nobody else seems as incensed as I. I’m referring to the singing of our national anthem at public events.
Admittedly, “The Star-Spangled Banner” lacks a certain something, musically speaking. But over the years, singers ranging from my aunt Sara to Richard Tucker have been able to do it justice, merely by singing it simply and sincerely. But at some point during the past dozen years or so, certain female singers have decided that the only way to perform it was as if they were auditioning to provide orgasms for a porno soundtrack.
Maybe I’m being too harsh. Perhaps these song birds don’t intend any disrespect to the anthem. Perhaps they simply don’t understand that patriotism means loving your country, not having sex with it.
BurtPrelutsky@aol.com







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
62 Comments
Very good points! Your last statement says it all about what's happened to the American "culture" – "Perhaps these song birds don’t intend any disrespect to the anthem. Perhaps they simply don’t understand that patriotism means loving your country, not having sex with it. " Too many of these people don't know the difference any more.
These are the people who think it's the constitutional right to have sex with anything that strikes their fancy.
Okay, let's give people the right to burn the flag, just so long as I have the right to wrap them in it first.
My thoughts exactly! Please don't go lousing up good songs with your "interpretations". If someone is a bad singer, no amount of bare flesh and panting and "interpretation" is going to make up for it. Get off the stage.
I echo your statement. I've worn the patch on my uniform, the stars face forward, never back.
Some of you might recall the efforts of the 'mouth of the south' Ted Turner to have the Star Spangled Banner removed as our anthem and replaced by 'America the Beautiful'. Seems Teddy thought it too 'warlike'… the great divide in this country is really between those who will fight for what they believe and those too personally cowardly to do so. Being the Greatest Country on God's Green Earth (sorry, Michael Medved!) has both huge benefits and huge responsibilities.
Sometimes that requires a battle or two. The national anthem as currently construed speaks to that dynamic.
And we are respected worldwide- maybe not loved, but respected- because of it…
The vocal Calesthenics on the National Anthem make me ill. It is all about attention grabbing. and compensation for not actually being able to pull it off.
however, this one is just about perfect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKCVS57j284
and while we are at it can we all please wait until the song is over before applauding and cheering?
I'm no fan of Ted Turner, but I do prefer "America the Beautiful' over The Star Spangled Banner. My reasons aren't political. I just think it's a prettier song and much easier to sing.
I personally have no problems with our National Anthem. I think it's a classic and when done properly and with a decent voice, it still swells me up with pride. As cheesy as that sounds, I stand by my position. Also as a singer myself, I enjoy the melody, but then again, I am a 1st soprano.
Be careful if you try that, the Hufpo kids go up like kindling. . . it's all the built up methane.
For those singers it isn't about the flag or the country. It is about singing in front of a large audience and pulling out all the stops to show how great a singer they are, despite the fact that the anthem is not a rhythm and blues torch song and they end up sounding like idiots. They have no concept of sacrificing their moment of delusional self-aggrandizement for the true aggrandizement of the symbol of the Greatest Country on God's Green Earth. There are people out there who know how to sing in order to highlight the song and not the singer (my self-effacing 18 year old son being one of them) but I guess the organizers of such things are blinded by the flash and glitter of celebrity. Or should I say deafened?
and I find it odd that nobody else seems as incensed as I.
Add my longsuffering voice to yours. It's been a pet peeve for years.
It's an Anthem meant to be sung by all present. The screeching and obligatos are a coarse trend.
You do not have to be a constitutional scholar we have a president that has that background. We just need to sit back and watch how he will subvert it with his knowledge. Or we may choose to read it along with:
Magna Carta 1215
Columbus Letter Announcing His Discovery 1493
The Mayflower Compact 1620
Pennsylvania Charter of Privileges 1701
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death Patrick Henry, 1775
The Declaration of Independence 1776
Articles of Confederation 1777
Constitution of the United States ratified 1788
Bill of Rights and the Later Amendments
Petition from the Pa. Society for the Abolition of Slavery 1790
Washington's Farewell Address 1796
The Star Spangled Banner 1814
The Monroe Doctrine 1823
Lincoln's First Inaugural Address 1861
The Emancipation Proclamation 1863
The Gettysburg Address 1863
The Pledge of Allegiance 1892
The American's Creed 1918
Or we could just sit back and watch what a newer generation of thinkers can come up with to subvert these out dated documents.
If it takes you longer than a minute and a half to sing the national anthem, you're just being self indulgent and using it to honor yourself over your country. I remember seeing a fight once, where the boxing match was shorter than the anthem.
I like "America, F**k Yeah!" from Team America.
Wouldn't it be nice if somebody came out on the field with an acoustic guitar and nothing else and just sang the song simply like your aunt sarah did? Or maybe just simply acapella? Or maybe no leader at all–no showboat, no 50 note embellishments on that high note at "free". Just the crowd. Better yet—a group of 6th graders just out there on the field getting the notes and words wrong but who cares! Just a simple rendition of the song. Less is more they told me in acting class. America the Beautiful is nice but The Star Spangled Banner has more meaning. (Refer to Wikipedia for information regarding the genesis of the song.) It says that America will stand. That, for these times, is the song I'd rather sing. Land of the free, home of the brave. Oh yeah!
"Perhaps these song birds don’t intend any disrespect to the anthem"
There is no doubt in my mind that Rosanne Barr meant total disrespect for flag and country when she performed her rendition of the Star Spangled Banner. Anyone else remember?
That right already exists. It's in the Thirty-Ninth Amendment, which the Supreme Court hasn't found yet.
Best version I ever heard was the a capella version by Huey Lewis and the News. Basic, straightforward, no long long LONG note-hold on "free".
Let's not blame the younger generation of entertainers. Back in '68 Jose Feleciono (sp?) performed a non-traditional version of the SSB before the beginning of the World Series in Detroit. Quite a stir at the time. Ever since then, entertainers have felt the need to make the SSB their own. Sing it straight, 120 beats per minute, leave out the artistic stylings.
Oh man. Thanks for bringing that up
now I've got that awful screeching stuck in my head. Ugh ugh ugh. Carrie Underwood has a pretty version, pretty straightforward, still Carrie style but always gives me goosebumps. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePMrIe5SBqw That's not the best performance of it she's given but it is a good example.
I love the tune and the words (all of the words) to the Star Spangled Banner. But I can't sing anything more complicated that Merrily We Roll Along, and I'm far from alone. That puts about 75% out of the running for singing it decently. I'd prefer "God Bless America," but we all know what that would lead to. Since I don't want the ACLU vetoing the national anthem, I would settle for "America the Beautiful." Melisma twerps ruin everything they sing anyway, so there's no sense worrying about public performances by wannabe divas.
I prefer a military band performing the anthem. That way you know it's being performed by people that respect the song and it's meaning.
Remember, hell — I was trying to forget it.
I'm with you on that one.
This makes you one of only a handful of Americans that can actually sing it right! (jk) I am not among your number, though I had to sing the Anthem in the front-leaning-rest (push-up position) in Basic Training. I had accidentally worn my hat inside and one of the Drill Sergeants had me do it to prove I wasn't Russian.
Yeah there is that too!!
Fight to save the M****erF**k'n Day yeah!
back in the service, in the base theaters, it was the first thing that played, even before then endless trailers. It felt right on so many levels.
It wasn't long after I realized that the "Star Spangled Banner" ends in a question that I decided to join the Marine Corps.
Brilliant observation!
**applause**
I've always thought that some people just want to milk their moment in the spotlight. It seems that some performers can take a four minute song and stretch it to ten minutes. As long as they don't "rap" it or or bungle the words, I can usually stand to listen. But give me the pure voice of someone just singing it the way it was written any day.
Considering the melody is that of an old drinking song, it seems it's just karma for some people to sing it like drunks. I used to always get a laugh out of my mother when I put Cher's version on in the car. It's respectfully sung, but…it's Cher. It just seems wrong. I actually have been playing Marvin Gaye's version quite a bit in the iPod. The 80's drum machine backup is dreadful, but the audience response is wonderful. I can't sing it worth a damn, but I love going to the Hollywood Bowl and braying along with the rest of the wine-filled crowd when the orchestra strikes it up in the twilight before the concert begins. But the only thing I hate more than the melismatics is precocious tots squeaking their way through it.
Is unconstitutional to burn Roseanne Barr ??
(1) EPA restricts the burning of trash
(2) sometimes these grease fires get out of hand
(3) Who will pay Arnold's alimony ?
(4) _______________your nightmare here .
Hendrix, enough said. Still the most inspirational version for the reality-impaired.
I like how you're thinking!
I"d tell everyone to read ALL the verses to the Star-Spangled Banner, but then the lefties would REALLY come over and try to ban it. (It's the fourth verse that gives the motto "In God is our Trust".)
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0194015.html
The story behind the SSB is impressive and inspiring. Most of today's idiots don't know where and whence it came.
It is about defending America, not about war or brutality. History is a lost art I guess.
He is no Constitutional Scholar. He did teach law part time for a time.
The sad thing is whether it's The Star Spangled Banner, America The Beautiful or Merrily We Roll Along, most people in the stands still won't bother to learn the lyrics or what the words mean.
Wouldn't you just love to hear that played during the medal ceremony at the Olympics?
'Banner' is an old English drinking song; and it requires 31/2 octave range to do well- we agree with you on the relative merits of both songs but the military in us likes the more 'martial' feel of 'Banner'…
Team America fans… yet another reason to like this site. US Army psywar types would drive all over the Sandbox blasting the 'Team America' soundtrack through loudspeakers; namely the tune you so aptly mentioned…
Honestly, I'll take a the grandstanding, attention seeking vocal calisthenics over an another intentionally disrespectful mocking version, a la Barr, any day of the week.
Call me old fashioned, but as a former Marine, this is the only way the anthem should be sung. I don't even mind that its by the Air Force!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVPR0bNRadE
Personally I like the Star Spangled Banner and as is… both versus…. but heaven help us if we have an anthem that has a history behind it that tells people of how we became the nation we are today… :/
Ick… how can anyone forget…. they played many times AFTER the fact…. Thanks, now I will have musical nightmares for weeks thanks to thinking about her "singing"… :/
Narcissistic entertainers. But I repeat myself.
Maybe her balls just itched.
She did grab them after she finished the anthem. Then, she spit on the ground. Ah, what rapier like wit.
Nice! As a fussy side note, I'd like a wee bit more of the "t" sound at the end of "night" etc, but the basses! Oh, I love basses! (another 1st soprano here)
Personally, I do not care if they sex it up just as long as they get the words right.
As for flag burning, I don't mind if someone burns the flag – so long as they wrap themselves in it first.
Every year some people talk about changing the national anthem of Australia (which is Advance Australia Fair) as it is boring and not as good or as interesting as other songs.
But I'm of the opinion that national anthems are meant to be pompous and boring.
But sometimes, on some occasions you hear it and get goose bumps, the hair (if you have any) on the back of your neck stands up and you get a tear in they eye. You realize, it's not the song itself, it's what it stands for, what it represents that is important and I realize I love my crappy, pompous, boring national anthem.
I can't believe this article was allowed to be posted. It has absolutely no direction and the central purpose is pitifully trivial.
Though I have to say that this matter has nothing to do with free speech in my mind (it's their right to sing it any way they like, no matter how disrespectful or bad it may be – i.e. Roseanne), I'm telling you right now that you've got it down pat that singers have been taking creative license with the anthem waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too far in recent years…
I found the title of your post intriguing. I took one (and only one) poetry writing class in college and one kid in the class, a son of a very well known 'limousine liberal' whose name I will not mention, wrote a poem called 'Scarred, Mangled Banner.' At the time I just knew it was a bad poem, but at the time I was so surrounded by liberalism I had not yet had a chance to see it for the madness it really is. Anyway, resume your lives.
I am not saying he is a real Constitutional Scholar he just happened to teach:
"He worked as a civil rights attorney in Chicago and also taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004."
This may not make him a Scholar of the Constitution only a teacher of it.
Well its either its singing the anthem as if you were about to bare your breasts or Janet JAckson actually bearing her breasts……
You pick….,..
Sanmon
We live in a society today where the president and his lawyers are unable to agree on the definition of the word "is"
A fair reading of any of these documents has no chance {sigh}
Now I know why Ann Coulter likes you. You animal, you.
[...] Don’t mangle it says Burt Prelutsky at Big Hollywood: “Not being a constitutional scholar, I am naturally reluctant to become too embroiled in these matters. However, there is one thing about which I have a strong opinion, and I find it odd that nobody else seems as incensed as I. I’m referring to the singing of our national anthem at public events. [...]
Everybody's a critic!
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.