Letterman: Another Intolerant Robot for the Left
by Brian Jennings
–
Given the choice between watching Letterman or Leno, I choose Leno and have for years. Leno lines up much better politically and I think his humor is much stronger than Letterman. I also think Letterman is shallow. Not much between the ears. He pans to those who really aren’t well informed because he isn’t well informed. He can give you a headline but no content. When I have seen or heard his “Top Ten,” it’s most often just dumb and not worth the energy to even smile. He’s a book with no pages. During an exchange with Bill O’Reilly I caught on Fox this week, I was reminded why Letterman’s a dweeb. Letterman wanted to talk about Rush Limbaugh, “He’s too smart to believe what he’s saying. You (O’Reilly) are too smart to believe what you say.” HUH? I don’t know about you, but when someone says that to me, I get a little hot under the collar. How do you say “thought police?”
Letterman is a voice for the far left who doesn’t even listen to Limbaugh. Most of them never have. In my career as a radio programmer I was always amazed at how people would criticize Limbaugh and other conservative voices and then when questioned it became obvious they had never listened to them. They couldn’t even tell you when they were on the air. Because these personalities were conservative they were automatically bad people. These empty suits simply repeated the party line. They are intolerant robots for the left.
One of the tenets of the left is to repeat their mantra until it becomes truth. Say it often enough and people will eventually believe it. They also want to re-program our thoughts so when we speak it’s what they want to hear. Letterman’s comment is an example of just that. For him to suggest Limbaugh and O’Reilly are too smart to believe what they say is condescending and insulting. How can Letterman believe what he says?
As one who has coached hundreds of talk radio personalities, I can tell you that unless a host believes what he says, he will never gain an audience and ratings. Listeners will see through them. Limbaugh isn’t phony. His ratings are at an all time high. O’Reilly isn’t phony. His ratings have topped #1 for 100 months in a row. This takes hard work and authenticity. Letterman’s shallow criticism is another example of how the left just won’t engage in a meaningful exchange because there’s nothing between their ears.
Letterman also stated he wants Limbaugh to be the “new head of the Republican party.” When asked by O’Reilly why, he responded: “He’s tubby.” Really funny, Dave. Really funny.
-Brian Jennings is author of “Censorship: The Threat to Silence Talk Radio.“ The book will be published by Simon & Schuster May 5th, and is available now on Amazon.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Tips & Feedback
82 Comments
I recall an interview with Leno where he talked about performing at some Republican function (related to Arnold being elected maybe?) when he wasn't Republican, and getting criticized for it. And he said that his view on that is that he's a comedian first. That's his profession. It was his job to entertain.
I appreciated that sentiment, because it seems to me that a whole lot of people, comedians or actors, don't respect their profession as something worth-while in its own right. I think that's why so many think they have to talk about politics.
I realized Letterman was a lightweight when he mocked Petr Beckman's "The Health Hazards of NOT Going Nuclear," which he obviously had not even bothered to read. He is not one to question The Conventional Wisdom.
Brian Jennings! What a short, but refreshing piece of writing! Your brief article encapsulates EXACTLY what I've thought of David Letterman for years now … and let me add, I used to like watching Letterman … now I surf right past him … same with the blowhard Keith Olbermann … I can't watch that guy even do sports, I've come to destest this man (creature?), mainly because he is simply vacuous between the ears and speaks with a phony self-congratulating condescension that I, for one, can't stand. Letterman is not THAT bad, but hey, why bother watching these people?
Thanks, job well done. BTW: I now routinely tell New Yorkers (if it comes up) what I think of Letterman, and they invariably go into catatonic shock, followed by the 'Obama without his Teleprompter' stare. It makes my day to prick their little '… is there life outside of Manhattan?' bubble.
Letterman, worshiped Johnny Carson, at least Carson tried to be apolitical…
fun nee
he responded: “He’s tubby.”
Just another cheap joke at someone else's expense.
Aren't the libs supposed to be the tolerant people? Sensitive to other people?
"He nationalized the banks, the media, he's letting ( I didn't catch the first name) and Castro have his ear."
Sound like anyone else you know, Dave?
Here's a hint: he doesn't even need to nationalize the media because you all are already in his corner.
"He's too smart to believe what he says."
That is the most cowardly way of calling someone a lying idiot that I've ever heard. It's also the most elitist. Letterman – sniff your own navel lint, I'm not interested.
(And, btw, it's 'Michael' Steele, not Richard.)
Letterman also stated he wants Limbaugh to be the “new head of the Republican party.” When asked by O’Reilly why, he responded: “He’s tubby.” Really funny, Dave. Really funny.
You're wrong Dave, your answer is "because this is a Democrat talking point and I am repeating it because I don't know how to think."
Letterman also stated he wants Limbaugh to be the “new head of the Republican party.” When asked by O’Reilly why, he responded: “He’s tubby.” Really funny, Dave. Really funny.
You're wrong Dave, your answer is "because this is a Democrat talking point and I am repeating it because I don't know how to think."
PS: nice article
Letterman is a vacuous waste of air time. He supposedly graduated from Ball St., that doesn't say much for Ball St. as unprepared as he was for that interview. O'Reilly showed him for the buffoon he is.
Just another coupla months til Conan O'Brien takes over the Tonight Show. I like his sense of the surreal – Letterman had it a long time ago, but he just seems to be bitter and coasting now. Leno was always too vanilla for me, which is why I hung on with Letterman long past his sell-by date. They're all liberals, but at least O'Brien puts the humor first.
Leno and O'Brien both lean slightly left. But they both make jokes about Obama and the genius economists in DC. I don't mind the pro-liberal bent, at least they've kept a certain sense of proportion. Letterman, in the other hand, isn't funny, he's off the left side of the charts, and he's just plain nasty.
Leno and O'Brien both lean slightly left. But they both make jokes about Obama and the genius economists in DC. I don't mind the pro-liberal bent, at least they've kept a certain sense of proportion. Letterman, on the other hand, isn't funny, he's off the left side of the charts, and he's just plain nasty.
On air he did keep it down the middle, I understand he was a raving lefty off air. It dissapointed me some to find that out, but obviously he was entitled to his opinion. Millionaire liberal / Oxymoron.
No No No you have giot it wrong ..,…..
It is everyone else who should be sensitive and tolerant. The libs get to be as obnoxious as they want because some artsy fartsy guy on NPR will call it Avant Garde…………….
Dave is just jealous because it is his wrters that are to smart to believe wha Dave says……………
Uh, no, never. You mean like "Uh, I …bowl a 29, like a special olympics uh, er…duh."
He sat there one night (saw a clip) and asked a like minded automotron if she believed, and agreed that Pres. Bush should be tried for war crimes. Only an off the chain leftist says crap like that. He was earnest and believed what he was saying. Unbelieveable. Yet he lives in the priviledge of American with his cars and boats and private jet, what a hypocrite. When will another one of these lefties put his money where his mouth is like Paul Newman did.
He sat there one night (saw a clip) and asked a like minded automatron if she believed, and agreed that Pres. Bush should be tried for war crimes. Only an off the chain leftist says crap like that. He was earnest and believed what he was saying. Unbelieveable. Yet he lives in the priviledge of American with his cars and boats and private jet, what a hypocrite. When will another one of these lefties put his money where his mouth is like Paul Newman did.
Letterman is the face of the Democratic Party; mind-numbingly ignorant, nasty, condescending, and shockingly, all plainly obvious. 'I think 50% of what you say is made up. 'Have you ever watched the show? 'No'.
There is something seriously, seriously wrong when you have no idea how stupid you make yourself look/sound.
Yeah, and then he dredged up the oxycodin thing. Letterman should not cast any stones, as I'm sure there are a few nasties in the closet. O'reilly did put him in his place, when he questioned the cheapshots. What a hypocritical asshat
I am 35 now and i remember growing up as a teenager and all of my buddies and I thought Dave ruled the world. This was when he was still following Johnny on Latenight and to this day i still think he was so funny…However, I still rooted for him even as Leno crushed him in the ratings after 2 years of the Late Show and always found myself really searching hard for something that was funny about Dave's Lateshow 'cause i still felt I was on his side RE: the battle for the Tonight Show and thought he got shafted…Now the years have gone on a little further, in the last 5 years, when I have had the misfortune of trying to get that 1980s Dave back and trying to convince myself that he is still funny, all I do is turn him off…His top 10s are rediculously stupid, his writers are terrible and his behavior this last political cycle has been nothin' short of disgusting. The funnny thing is, Letterman has always (until the last couple years) been thought of as a moderate Repub but it is apparent the big left Hollywood machine has him in it's grips. Whatever Dave, you are irrelevant, you are uterly humorous and O'reilly owns you everytime he comes on your show….Retire Dave, you are a joke…
Well, considering that Ball State (or, as we IU students like to refer to it, Testicle Tech) has a well-deserved rep for being THE party school of Indiana, and that Letterman skated by with something like a "C" average (as far as I know he didn't go beyond his four years to obtain anyting more than a master's degree, I don't think he's a shining example of the state's more intelligent grads. Lucky, yes. Intelligent, no.
I mean humourless…lol
Letterman Rules!
The problem for the left is that their "philosophy" is in tatters after a century of failure, oppression and mass murder. History has judged and they lost. Capitalism and democracy won.
But that hasn't discouraged leftist ideologues, who more often than not are motivated more by the desire to "settle" imaginary scores than any sort of real philosophical belief. But since their ideas can't sell, they have chosen a more subversive strategy — lying about their intentions and goals, and demonizing their enemies. Thus, the hide behind shallow platitudes an illusory promises of a utopian future and they whip up their followers with outrageous claims of wrongdoing by all they oppose.
Sadly, this works on certain types of weak minds — those that cannot deal effectively with the real world and long for some special place where everything will be different. These are the same types of people who are attracted to cults. Since their followers are essentially unthinking cultists, is it any surprise that they would treat them as such, e.g. pounding slogans into their minds in place of reason.
(cont)
I don't see Letterman as an ideologue because I don't see him having the intellect. I see him as merely having his finger in the wind and doing what he thinks the culture expects of him at the moment. Frankly, I'd be shocked if he even grasped the basics of any particular ideology or philosophy.
Letterman's wife is ugly.
Thanks high school. Aren't you late for detention or something?
Reflecting on the two articles about Letterman and all the comments posted here today and yesterday,
I realized that of all the people I have known personally,
the one who was the biggest Letterman fan is also one of the most tiresome, unbearable jerks I have ever known.
Somehow I doubt this is pure coincidence.
Recently I ran into him, and our five minute chat showed me he has not matured notably in the 30 years since we first met – still pathetic & odious (fatuously, obliviously full of himself).
Hmm, kinda like Letterman – he has not improved over the years.
Another 'coincidence': This jerk I know has been obscenely overpaid for churning out insubstantial, instantly forgettable, third-rate "entertainment" for most of his adult life. Not unlike David Letterman.
Maybe it's just me, but I find these parallels striking.
Having watched both Letterman and Leno during a good deal of Bush's second term, it's very clear to me that Letterman is much more of a mouthpiece for the Left. While I suspect Leno is at least left-of-center, he will make fun of both sides, and he has conservative-leaning guests on sometimes (i.e. Dennis Miller). Much the same could be said for Conan. Letterman hammered Bush relentlessly, and he is now in complete thrall over Obama. Moreover, he can't hold a candle to Leno (or Conan) in terms of actual humor. Actually, if anyone might be considered even a little right-leaning, it would be Craig Ferguson. Sure, he's crude, and I gather he didn't think much of Palin. But I can remember an episode shortly after the election where he was receiving applause at the beginning of the show, and he said, "No! Don't applaud me yet! That would be like applauding a man elected president when he hasn't actually done anything yet!" I raised a cheer right away. I would not be sorry to see him replace Letterman pronto.
Not to long before he passed away, I saw some article where he was bashing Bush as a serious topic, not just poking fun. But on stage, he pretty much let every politician have it.
'Democracy means no taxation without representation, and god knows, we've just about had the hell represented out of us." –Johnny Carson
Letterman's entire schtick from day one has been "I'm too hip to be funny. If you're hip enough, you'll think I'm great." Letterman is the whole reason why the culture fell in love with the concept of "ironic" (in quotes, of course) in the '90s – the perfect "comedian" for Clinton's America. He's a shallow snob who's been the flag waver for other shallow snobs. Always. Period. If there's anybody who thinks Letterman "used" to be funny, it's because they're proud of having once been a snob. Camille Paglia nailed him once and forever with "That smirking ass."
Thanks for the kind words. Olbermann drives me nuts. And, Mathews…..yikes!
What O'Reily should have said – Rush got hooked on a med his doctor gave him, a med now known for its addictiveness. He should have said Obama – in his book – claimed that he regretted his drug use while in college- drugs bought from the neighborhood pusher. You can't compare the two situations. My nephew's wife – a sweet 32 year old has had her life destroyed by Oxycon – from a back injury. She cannot get off them in spite of several tries. Her family has been destroyed as well. Rush was not to blame for his drug use – Obama certainly had the choice to take his first snort.
To give past Dave a little credit, 10 years ago when he had James Carville on his show just after the Lewinksy scandal, James tried to brush it off as being nothing but partisan politics and was ripped by Letterman for not admitting that Clinton deserved a large part of the blame for getting himself into trouble.
There were people on the left at that time who were also angry at Clinton for (in their eyes) giving the Republicans a way to further block the liberal agenda, so I don't know if Dave was coming at Carville from that direction, or from one at least a little more middle-of-the-road. But the 2000 election really sent him into bitter political land, and save for the 9-10 month period after Sept. 11, Letterman's been venturing further and further into Olbermannland with his attempts at political humor.
Eh I figured this out years ago when he went right along with every other libtard and bashed Bush for every gaffe ever made… but wouldn't touch the Democrap's and their gaffes… at least not with the same fervor. I haven't like Letterman in a long time… Unfortunately my Grandparent's love him… :/
Einstein also said "The majority of the stupid is invincible, and will be with us always."
Talk about prescient.
I know a couple people who have worked for Letterman in the past. From what they tell me he is not a nice guy. But you can tell that from his show. There's been several occasions on his show were the guest deliberately tried to freak him out because he was such an a-hole.
I don't know what kind of ratings Letterman draws, but it's obvious that CBS doesn't care about them (or the audience) when they keep Couric on, whose ratings are consistently in the cellar. I guess they make up for it with the ratings blockbuster "Two and a half men" which caters to people who love the same tired sex jokes repeated each week.
As for Letterman, his time is over and he is just another bitter old liberal who's made his millions and thinks he's the smartest guy in the room. I did see the interview with O'Reilly and I think that Dave got his clock cleaned by Bill O.
I remember a year/2 ago O'Reilly was on Letterman and it actually got a bit ugly. Forget what the conversation was about but in essence O'Reilly wouldn't let Letterman get away with his usual stuff. I think Dave is an ass, but I mean that in a nice way
I used to love 2 and a half men but honestly how long can you have the same shtick and still keep it funny? Besides Jack isn't a cute little kid any more.
Leno and O'Brien both lean slightly left. But they both make jokes about Obama and the genius economists in DC. I don't mind the pro-liberal bent, at least they've kept a certain sense of proportion. Letterman, on the other hand, isn't funny, he's off the left side of the charts, and he's just plain nasty. You have to be pretty nasty to make O'Reilly look like an anger management counseler.
I'm not sure Ferguson is more right leaning. He's british, we all know what kind of system they have over there. The all possess a sputum quota which they MUST use on the incumbent at all times!
HEY, now is not a good time for conservatives to bash Letterman. Why? Because he's waking up. Please, read first, then comment.
Facts: He's a businessman sitting on a pile of money and making more, and is facing an administration that thinks he's evil and must be taxed out of existence. He just had a son in 2003. After swearing he'd never marry again, he quietly got wed March 19.
He's starting to show promising signs of conservatism. He's worked harder than you may think, building his production company, Worldwide Pants Inc. And now liberals think he should spread his wealth around? How much national debt is his son getting saddled with? And just why did he get married? It must have meant a lot to him to do so. Among entertainment types it seems so, old fashioned, so… socially conservative?
I'd expect loud liberal noises from him. In his business, anything else is suicidal. They're so loud you'd think he was denying something, like a certain recent presidential candidate who said I wouldn't see my taxes go up a dime, ha ha. Wikipedia says his contract is up Fall 2010. If it looks like he's coasting, he probably is. It seems doubtful CBS will re-sign him for the same or more money, he doesn't need it, and has a kid to raise. Looks like he's going to walk.
So, just back off for now, feel free to keep watch if you want, I will. But please, don't scare off a new guy.
Dave is using the, "there is no debate" tactic. It is all settled. Anyone who doesn't agree is a fool. I-don't-have-to-give you-a-valid-reason. In fact, the answer , "he's tubby" is meant to be absurd and unreasonable to illustrate how far beyond debate the whole issue is. Letterman became a comedian by pretending to be an absolute dork. It was kind of charming. Now he is just another smug bully.
so…wait…. Ball is the 57th state?
David Letterman is disgusting. I cannot watch the man, as he makes me physically ill. He says Rush is tubby? Letterman looks like he probably always smells of cabbage. Bill O'Reilly ate his lunch, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. You could drive a truck through the gap in Letterman's teeth, and also through the void between his ears. He's not funny. He could stay at home and "phone-in" his half-a@@ed show every night. YUCK!
And, Rush does not need a teleprompter!
I used to WORSHIP Dave, especially in the '80s, on the old NBC show. It's so sad to see such an innovator become such a tired old liberal hack. When you let idiology destroy comedy, you're no better than Jon Stewart, SNL, or the Taliban.
I never watch David Letterman. RIghtly or wrongly I blamed him personally for bumping SCTV (my favorite show) off the air.
That's what comes with knowing your subject matter. Wait a minute, what does that say about our President? Hmmmm.
What I find terribly interesting is how the left thought that Letterman was the "victor" in this little exchange with O'Reilly. Just blew my mind when I read that.
Given the choice between watching Letterman or Leno, I choose Leno and have for years. Leno lines up much better politically…
Isn't it sad that we've reached the point where we are judging entertainment talk shows as political vehicles? God rest Johnny, you might realize that he leaned left personally, but that drive he hit at the end of the monologue usually was down the middle. He took shots at everyone, and never came across as mean (he apparently saved that for his private life).
http://www.alistz.net
When asked by O'Reilly if he (Letterman) wanted America to prevail in Iraq, instead of the obvious answer, "Yes", he stuttered, "Well I'm a thoughtful person…". I think that pretty much encapsulates his (and the Lefts) feelings about th US and our war on terror.
Bravo!
I really thought that O'Reilly missed the homerun ball with this one.
It's an admitted fact that the "Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican party" line was a propaganda campaign initiated during the morning phone meeting of Obama's Clintonista crew (Carville/Stehphanapolous and others).
So, when Letterman says "You guys cant possibly believe the things you say", but then repeats the known Carvillian propaganda, he clealy is positioned to be hoisted on his on petard.
(And if "Carvillan" catches on a synonym for propaganda…I invented it!)
http://www.alistz.net
I really thought that O'Reilly missed the homerun ball with this one.
It's an admitted fact that the "Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican party" line was a propaganda campaign initiated during the morning phone meeting of Obama's Clintonista crew (Carville/Stehphanapolous and others).
So, when Letterman says "You guys cant possibly believe the things you say", but then repeats the known Carvillian propaganda, he clearly is positioned to be hoisted on his on petard.
(And if "Carvillan" catches on a synonym for propaganda…I invented it!)
http://www.alistz.net
So you're equating the American left with the murderous totalitarian regimes of Europe and Asia? Very nuanced of you. (How exactly is this different from the left's unfair rhetoric that paints American conservatives as synonymous with Nazis?)
Wasn't Letterman on daytime TV about 29 or 30 years ago? I remember my kids laughing at his antics. He also continued to say "this is more fun than humans should be allowed to have," or something of that sort.
I didn't like him even then, but he made a great "baby sitter" that kept the little kiddies happy.
You state:
"One of the tenets of the left is to repeat their mantra until it becomes truth. Say it often enough and people will eventually believe it."
I think the father of modern propaganda said it as well.
“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over” – Joseph Goebbels
It is all a social agenda and without standing up and restructuring of the human mind to their idea's and it is time fire is fought with fire.
Keep it up.
Jennings: "O’Reilly isn’t phony. His ratings have topped #1 for 100 months in a row. This takes hard work and authenticity." By this logic Paula Abdul and Simon Cowell are the most sincere and genuine people on TV.
Dave's always been a jerk, and in his long career has had occasion to make almost everyone angry: white, black, left, right, gay, straight, and apparently even middle-aged conservative white guys still seething over the last election.
So your saying he's too dumb to believe what he's saying?
Wow, you're a genius, did you think of that by yourself or did you steal that from a book?
Nice!
Dave has always been a jerk, but he hasn't always been as rabidly anti-American and political as he is now. The left totally controls the media. Everything we choose to see or hear in the MSM has a left leaning bias that is obvious to everyone except the most dense or irreversibly indoctrinated. Shows like Letterman and The Daily Show are just conduits for the guerilla personal attack tactics of the left. Middle aged white guys aren't seething over the last election. Conservatives didn't have a chance after the very effective character assasinations of the Left's News and Propaganda complex. In general I think conservatives are sick of constantly having everything politisized. There are no more safe havens, and frankly, that pisses people off.
Dave tries to perpetuate that O'Reilly is a fringe lunatic. Yet, he's just peachy with Olbermann when he's on the show. In Letterman's world anyone to the right of William Ayers and Ward Churchill are moderates.
Limbaugh isn’t phony. His ratings are at an all time high. O’Reilly isn’t phony. His ratings have topped #1 for 100 months in a row. This takes hard work and authenticity.
And sexual harrassment and drugs.
"Letterman is a voice for the far left"
One of the more goofy things I have seen posted here.
You guys don't ever mention that Letterman still does Clinton intern jokes every show, and has never stopped. He just goes for audience reaction. He's an Indiana moderate that has traveled to Iraq to visit troops more than once.
Yeah, what happened to him anyway? I remember him being almost defiantly apolitical back in the eighties. And it amazes me how everything has become so politicized-I picked up an old DVD set of SCTV and while watching was struck by the almost complete absence of any partisan political humor. Even SNL, though it always recognizably leaned left, wasn't as bad as it is now.
But they are not as mean spirited and political as the attacks on the right. Even people on the left know that Clinton's personal behavior is a joke, but he has never attack the left wing political agenda or inferred that they are Nazi's or idiots. The shows like Letterman & The Daily Show tow the left wing political line and nothing very controversial is said except against those who have fallen out of favor with the elitist establishment.
Agreed – and to suggest Rush or O'Reilly are too smart to believe what they say is lecturing us for our beliefs. Very condescending which is a sign of a liberal thinker. They are intolerant and know best.
It is so frequent for liberals to say things like this that I started noticing it during the 04 campaign. Variations of "you're far too smart to believe the things you say" or "the whole vehement conservative thing is a persona adopted to pander to small-minded redneck fans" is common. I've heard it said about Coulter, Beck, Limbaugh, even Bush and Cheney. I've had people say it to ME. My best friend was a teacher and is now in law school, and has had many people say it to him: "Wait, you're a Republican? But you seem so…smart! And nice!" Al Gore did it to Dan Quayle during a debate in 92, when he thanked him for not being racist or bigoted (like so many OTHER Republicans are).
It's always bugged me. I think if you're a liberal you're either stupid or evil (or maybe both) but I don't think it's FAKE. How sanctimonious are you to believe that it is literally impossible to honestly disagree with you?
Also, Moesart, doing a comfy USO tour and pretending to support the troops doesn't make you a conservative. I remember my last deployment, Al Franken coming to Iraq and doing his AWFUL "comedy" in front of, like, five soldiers who looked like they were there because the line at the internet cafe was too long. Ha.
P.S. Doing Clinton jokes is also not meaningful. Jon Stewart and Lewis Black did them also. The difference is the Clinton jokes are completely different in tone–the way you'd joke about a drunken, perverted old uncle. He embarrasses you, but you still love him. THAT's the tone they take about Clinton (or ANY liberal they joke about). But with a conservative, the humor is just vicious. The prime example of this is Family Guy.
I was surprised by this too. As if calling someone a "goon" in a long and contrived statement and then not allowing them to respond was a winning a debate move.
u watching a guy who makes fun of canadian troops dying in supprt of your US tropps in aghanistan?…seems your just as much as a f**king idiot as him…i could just imagine the uproar if a canadian "comedic" made fun of US troops dying…F**K gutfeld and if you watch him your just as bad as him (check youtube for his comments)
Obviously another thin-skinned useless Canadian. The man apologized. Get over it, dickhead.
Ya, Psychotic is the 51st….
He's riden that ugly gap in his teeth to millions, he certainly isn't funny.
They don't call it "The God That Failed" for nothing….
Letterman, what a tool. Hollywood just plain sucks!!!!!!! No talent no class.
You must be logged in to post a comment.