EXCLUSIVE: Carrie Prejean’s Attorney Responds to ‘Inaccurate and Misleading’ Rumors
by Big HollywoodIn an exclusive to Big Hollywood, Carrie Prejean’s attorney Charles LiMandri, released an official statement today regarding ”inaccurate and misleading” rumors leaked to the media within hours of Ms. Prejean reaching an agreement with The Miss California USA pageant, an agreement with assurances of confidentiality:
“In my 26 years of practice, I have never dealt with a situation quite like this. We came to a confidential agreement and yet within hours, rumors about what happened in the mediation were flying around the web and being accepted by news organizations as absolute fact. Carrie and I plan to continue to honor our confidentiality agreement with the other parties. But I can tell you this; many of the rumors circulating are inaccurate and misleading.”
Sunday evening Big Hollywood will publish an exclusive excerpt from Carrie Prejean’s upcoming book, “Still Standing: The Untold Story of My Fight Against Gossip, Hate, and Political Attacks.”
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Tips & Feedback
89 Comments
If it's found that the rumors and lies were purposefully started and spread, she'll end up owning California….but who in their right mind would want it!
Socialists would love it. They know the only thing preventing them from creating their Utopia is the right dear leader.
You know, they are only rumors if you can completely prove them false which would be kind of hard to do when TMZ has the video and just has not released it yet out of respect. Since the video exists, then the rumor are not rumors, they are fact!
Proving a rumor false seems impossible, as rumors are just rumors.
If there is a video and they used it to get her to settle, then it ends up in the hands of TMZ (or originated from them) then that is BLACKMALE and a broken legal contract. It is against the law and people should go to prison for it starting with the owner of the socalled video at TMZ. Plus if she did have a video out there who are we to throw stones. It doesn't make what she had been saying is any less right.
Yes Tom, because I heard a rumor you molest goats. So obviously, if you won't release the video proving you don't, then the truth has been revealed. {sigh}
I'm trying to figure out what the big deal is here. If there is a tape, it's something she did alone. Are Liberals now saying it's wrong for a grown woman to touch herself? I guess they really have fallen in love with the Muslim theology.
It's not hypocrisy to by a sinner. It is, however, hypocrisy to claim you stand for women's rights, then demean and smear them every time they disagree with you. If you like to hate women and minorities, the Democratic Party is the one for you.
I think this chick got screwed (no pun intended), but I think there is no doubt there is a tape. And that is freakin awesome. The chick is smokin.
I think the pageant claims that Carrie Prejean signed a paper to the effect that there were no nude or indecent pictures or videos of herself out there. Harvey Levin of TMZ really seems to hate her.
Modern day witch hunt by one harvey levin; Since the pageant committee bought breast implants for her did they "MAKE" Miss Prejean do this touch me tape; as a good PR move ? and then leaked to Levin ? Sure sounds like it to me How long will they torture this girl ? This is turning into a hate crime.
I like TMZ, but they have been on her case big time on the show and even more so on their web site.
TMZ deals with so many low-life dirt bags, so I find it curious that they have pursued this one girl simply b/c she said she didn't believe in gay marriage – and she is entitled to her opinion.
I have heard that Harvey Levin is gay, but that makes no difference to me. He has gay guys working on the show, but they don;t seem especially self-righteous.
The whole thing has been a witch hunt from the beginning. A beauty contest judged by a gay judge? Gimme that fabled break.
The sex video – a masturbation video, it seems, made for…no one knows for public yet. Herself? A boyfriend? Whatever.
How does the alleged video compromise her stand on anything?
She's no saint and she can have opinions and still be a hottie who did a video.
I'm looking forward to seeing it.
Because Harvey Levin has smoked more pole in a week, than she has in her entire life, allegedly.I heard someone say there is a tape of him smoking pole.
"TMZ has the video and just has not released it yet out of respect."
Oh, come on. Don't buy into their spin.
They can't release it w/o being sued.
Who owned the video?
TMZ is not in the porn video business.
They used this same b/s excuse when they had the video of Erin Andrews. It's all spin.
If they could release either video, they would have done so.
Lawyers……tsk tsk tsk….
"TMZ has the video and just has not released it yet out of respect."
Oh, come on. Don't buy into their spin.
They can't release it w/o being sued.
Who owned the video?
TMZ is not in the pawn video business.
They used this same bull excuse when they had the video of Erin Andrews. It's all spin.
If they could release either video, they would have done so.
Lawyers……tsk tsk tsk….
Levin is obsessed with her in a very disturbing way. TMZ will take any opportunity to try to make her look, in their minds, bad– but it's reached the point that it is just pathetic. It's like reading the diary of a pervy Uncle.
Tom did that hurt when you used your two brain cells to think that up? It had to have because it hurt the rest of us just trying to navigate that bizarre line of thinking…..
If they have a video then release it. OK? To me if they really had a video they'd have released it. Since they are hiding it if there is one then this occurs. So TMZ eitehr put up or shut up. Bring it on.
In my way of thinking, I seriously doubt they have a video. Considering the scumbags who run Ms. CA. it wouldn't surprise me Shanna the Playboy bimbo Moakler and her little friend were the rumor mongers here. So again TMZ put up or shut up.
How do you find self respecting women to date? I can't imagine any mature female wanting anything to do with a guy like you. Barf.
I hate TMZ. Gossip is evil. They are perveyors of gossip. If it shut down I'd not bat an eye. There is free speech and then there is disgusting vile evil smearing.
Hey NOW I just found a man that needs to be neutered. If you are not too busy burning Sarah Palin in effigy that is.
I remember when a sex vid gave your career a shot in the… arm? Now it seems, since said individual has a conservative standing, it is EVIL and must be cast down for the good of the CHILDREN! Remember the senator with the wide stance? So he was cruising for male tail, so what? Most libs call that any Saturday night… so what is with the double standard?
I don't believe these sex tape rumors. Since when have the Prejean-haters shown any restraint in their attempts to smear her. If there really was a sex tape, it would be all over the internet. I'll believe it when I see it.
I think that Levin has a thing for Perez Hilton and he is just proving his love by destroying Prejean's Reputation. Remember leftards always use the Conservatives ethics and morals against them while having no idea of the hypocrisy.
if you hate gossip so much, why are you even replying to this story? Why would you even read gossip if it's evil? I do agree with you, I just found your statement ironic and funny.
No, Des, but it is a sin to be a hypocrite.
Ms Prejean has become a national figure of hooting and laughter — not because of what she does in private, but because of what she pretends in public.
I'm sure you understand the difference. No?
It is a standard clause regarding moral turpitude. She signed it. Everyone signs it. This is standard practice in the entertainment industry.
then that is BLACKMALE
They always messin' with the black male!
Ms Prejean has today destroyed her own reputation. This is of a pattern, you see. Most Americans resent the holier-than-thou preenings of the 'Family Values' crowd, and take understandable pleasure when they are found out to be, shall we say, insincere. The brilliant German expression is 'schadenfreude'.
Live by phony moralizing? Die by phony moralizing.
That's how it works in our country. Perhaps you hadn't noticed. Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter, Helen Chenowyth and Mark Sanford certainly noticed.
Why gee um because I am sick of conservative women being treated like this. OK does that make sense to you? Carrie Prejean is a decent human being and because she disagreed with the shallow, sniveling sleeze bags who run this pajent she has been crucified. Thats why I am saying what I am saying. OK? Kind of goes along with defending Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman…you know?
Prove it. I dare you.
I heard a rumor that Michael Moore is actually Keith Olbermann in a fat suit. Believe me, I have the video, I'm just not releasing it out of respect….
Of course the video is a hoax.
If TMZ had the video they would have released even if not on their website. Hell according to some reports the owner of the video was offering it for as little as $10000, now for that amount he could put it online himself selling it at $5 a pop and make more than that.
If the Miss Universe lawyers had the video they wouldn't risk their professional careers in a crude blackmail attempt that resembles the plot of a really bad TV movie.
How credulous are some people?
Just to clear up an apparent misconception:
TMZ has never claimed to OWN the tape, or to have a copy in their possession. They were SHOWN the tape as part of a business pitch. The owner met with different webmasters in an attempt to sell the footage…but of course, no salesperson would leave copies behind after such a meeting, as they'd know that once their footage is copied, and therefor has the potential to leaked onto the Internet, the original in their possession becomes practically worthless. (i.e., they're left with nothing to sell.)
As a side note, both CNN and E(!) online have verified the claim that the sex tape figured in the mediation process. I guess an outsider could claim a media "conspiracy" is at work here, and these three unrelated news sources are simply making everything up…but that would be a bit paranoid and unrealistic, IMHO.
The Doctor,
You are right, it's "blackmail" not "blackmale". My apologies. I guess I'll have to go on Al Sharpton's show to learn how to spell, after the appropriate time of groveling for forgiveness that is. But my point still stands.
"As a side note, both CNN and E(!) online have verified the claim that the sex tape figured in the mediation process. "
They are reporting what TMZ has claimed.
"the owner met with different webmasters in an attempt to sell the footage…but of course, no salesperson would leave copies behind after such a meeting"
Yet somehow the lawyers managed to get hold of it…. do you want to buy Brooklyn bridge?
<< They are reporting what TMZ has claimed >>
No, they claim to have verified their own reports independently. Have you read their coverage?
<< They are reporting what TMZ has claimed >>
No, they claim to have verified their own reports independently. Have you read their coverage?
<< Yet somehow the lawyers managed to get hold of it…. do you want to buy Brooklyn bridge? >>
Doesn't Donald Trump already own it?
Which leads me to: One doesn't have to have much imagination (or worldly experience) to envision that there are a variety of ways the defense could have ended up with the tape. Most obviously: Maybe Mr. Trump (who owns the pageant) was the one who finally purchased it, as a negotiating tool?
There are other possible scenarios, of course.
Well said!
I don't know if the pageant is guilty of extortion. Maybe they just told Prejean's attorneys that they could attack her credibility by introducing the tape at trial. Still, they paid her a $100,000 settlement for fees and costs. Why?
I thought that TMZ claimed to have the tape but said they weren't showing it because it's too explicit. But couldn't they show a still shot?
<< I don't know if the pageant is guilty of extortion. Maybe they just told Prejean's attorneys that they could attack her credibility by introducing the tape at trial. >>
It is not blackmail to produce evidence of violation of a contract. Prejean was saying she was fired for her "Christian Values", while the pageant answered that they fired her because she violated her contract. Prejean signed a statement — as all potential contestants must — that there were no nude photos or film of her in existence, nor would she participate in any such photography during her year as Miss California without the pageant’s permission.
The pageant lawyers showed her the tape which proved she had not been forthcoming; there were not only the previously leaked nude pictures, but there was a sex tape, the existence of which she had concealed. End Result: Contract Violation.
<< I thought that TMZ claimed to have the tape but said they weren't showing it because it's too explicit. But couldn't they show a still shot? >>
No, TMZ, to my knowledge, does not own it…they declined to buy it for $10,000. Therefore, they would not have screen shots.
<< Still, they paid her a $100,000 settlement for fees and costs. Why? >>
Maybe they still see her as a former employee, and they're not completely hateful? And besides, what's $100,000 to Donald Trump?
They hate her because she said she is a Christian. Plain and simple as that. I have been hounded by people, simply because I don't live in their little Godless world, so I can understand the hatred. Jesus said it would happen. He said, expect to be hated for your stand, "They hated me first"…..hand in there Carrie. Christians know that to be saved, does not mean to be perfect. It means to be forgiven.
Who is "they'? I don't hate her because she's Christian.
Harvey Levin.. well, he does like guys.
See link.
http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrities/people/da...
I for one am willing view any tape Carrie Prejean may have made. For authenticity sake od course.
<< Harvey Levin.. well, he does like guys. >>
Therefore…?
Me? You speak of me? How do you assume you know how I feel about Sarah Palin? What an odd assumption. I am pro-Palin.
I so dislike reactionaries.
And no neutering is required. It is normal male sexuality to be turned on by visual images. (As opposed to non-visible images.)
kind of like "not proud of America" michelle and her whining about whitey with rev wright and the other obama racist buddies
Sorry, lady. You're over the top.
so is TMZ sitting on the video of michelle obama whining about hating whitey?
Therefore he is Perez Hilton except for the dress and colored hair.
It was Perez Hilton who set her up.
<< Therefore he is Perez Hilton except for the dress and colored hair.
It was Perez Hilton who set her up. >>
Well, should we say all gay people (ie, Mr. Levin) are the same as Mr. Hilton? We wouldn't say all straight people are the same as Ms. Prejean.
"TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy." (Quote from TMZ.com post, November 4 at 5:00 PM.)
Sorry, but I don't buy the explanation that the pageant paid a $100,000 settlement (if true) for the reasons that you suggest. The leaked information about the settlement negotiations obviously comes from the defendant/cross-complainant pageant. Someone is acting in bad faith. Also, I'm an attorney, so I do understand contract violations and the legal issues that are involved.
Gee LolaLola
"Hate" much?
There may in fact be a video. And, there may be reasons (read: lawsuits) should it be broadcast.
Ooops…I forgot…someone died and left the job of "god" to moralistic right-wingers.
If Harvey Levin has any respect for anyone but himself, I'll be amazed.
He would release a sex vid with his own mother in it if he had it. If he had a sex tape, he would have released it a long time ago.
And to my second point, if she did make a sex tape….
SO WHAT!
LIAR! Moore is fatter than Olby and besides, they don't make fat suits that big.
HEY-OOOOOO!
Because the left doesn't have any ethics or morals. They are the 'if it feels good, do it' guys.
Just a bulliten guys, Carrie is going to be the #1 story on COUNTDOWN to no ratings. CUE MICHAEL MUSTO!!!
Aren't those left wingers a tolerant bunch?
Now that's news!
Liberals are the most intolerant
I don't hate anyone but apparently your anti Christian bigotry is alive and well. When you have thought thats worth sharing little person come find us, until then go pound sand.
"BLACKMALE"?
So you're trying to pin this on Obama, too, huh?
"…that would be a bit paranoid and unrealistic…"
Welcome to Outer Wingnuttia.
"They hate her because she said she is a Christian….I have been hounded by people, simply because I don't live in their little Godless world, so I can understand the hatred."
So are you saying you're a big, fat hypocrite like Carrie Prejean?
"Therefore…?"
Therefore…the wingnuts would consider Prejean morally superior to him even if she were revealed to be a mass murderer.
True…we ARE intolerant of hypocritical bigots.
Um, she claims she was 17 when the tape was made. Sounds like underage porn to me. Maybe that has something to do with the fact that, even though the tape's been in circulation for months, nobody wants anything to do with it…?
TMZ knows precisely where the lines for defamation and libel are drawn. There is no way they would have posted what they have without having the goods. Fuhgeddaboudit. Note that Prejean's weasel does NOT deny the existence of such a tape.
You hate yourselves?
Oh wait, in order to be a hypocrite one has to at least have standards to deliberately ignore. Nevermind.
Though I do find this definition of hypocrisy interesting:
"The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness. "
Hm.
You were saying something about being intolerant of bigots?
I like her. I have always liked her. She has huevos and moxy. I hate Perez H. and he was a little petulant pussy for doing what he did. The pageant was negligent in their handling of the situation.
All of that said, I am guessing that they had learned about said video when they finally fired her in June. I can't feel too sorry for her if it really does exist. If she was stupid enough to willingly participate in a video, then she must accept the wrath and consequences that will be heaped on her for such a stupid choice. I don't care much about it, personally, but I think it makes her look stupid, and it will certainly give her detractors plenty to call her out on for years to come. All of the morons love when a controversial conservative can be called a hypocrite.
That's why I'm not a liberal anymore. Too ridged, too much hate.
Attorney bluster and hot air. Prejean is a hypocrite, promoting what she calls "Christian values" on sexual issues while doing nude photo shoots (and lying about that — apparently truthfulness is not a Christian value to her). Then she gets caught with a sex tape that she did. Please note that no fundamentalist church would say she was acting within christian morality with that tape. There is an assumption that the pageant released the tape to the media which seems unlikely. I would guess that whoever gave the tape to them also tried to market the tape and handed it out. One really has to be a first class bimbo to go public on a sexual morality crusade with the photos she did and the sex tape floating around. That is first class stupid.
The only person who isn't a hypocrite on this Earth is the one without any standards to live up to.
There's just something missing from this story. Wouldn't Perez Hilton get the tape and show all or part of it? If it exists, it will surface eventually.
We are all big fat hypocrites. You are too. The difference is, Christians know they are sinners and need help in overcoming sin. IT doesn't mean we don't have sin. Carrie has sin, I do, you do, but with the grace of God, if we confess our sins, we can overcome them. So, when you criticize Carrie for being a big fat hypocrite…..you might want to take that log out of your own eye first. Jesus saw you coming and knew what you would say:
Matthew 7:5
You hypocrite! First remove the log from your own eye, and then you will see clearly enough to remove the speck from your brother's eye."
Am I the only one who has considered the possibility that someone on Carrie Prejean's team leaked the story about the sex video? After all, it's publicity and she is the one who's coming out with a book this week. She has already shown that she can be less than honorable by, among other things, lying about her previous nude photos and entering into a book transaction in violation of her pageant contract.
"Am I the only one who has considered the possibility that someone on Carrie Prejean's team leaked the story about the sex video? After all, it's publicity and she is the one who's coming out with a book this week. She has already shown that she can be less than honorable by, among other things, lying about her previous nude photos and entering into a book transaction in violation of her pageant contract."
The claim of lying about nude photos are in dispute, since if not been for her being in the photos, most of those attacking her would not call them nude. If they are nude, then how come those saying that to my knowledge never claim more revealing pictures shown in SI, Victoria's Secret, etc., is nudity?
And give us a break about the pageant contract. The contract was broken the very moment the pageant ended, when pageant officials attacked Carrie Prejean publically and threatened her repeatedly over belonging to a church that is against gay marriage (thus threatening to discriminate against her based on religion).
They did alot to violate the contract also by revealing info about her breast implants and probably about the so-called nude photos.
Basically, their claim to her having no right to speak or respond either publically or in book form is disingenous. They done much of the contract violations and by holding her to the contract where she cannot respond is basically turning what should be a simple contract into an inconsciouable one.
"Prejean is a hypocrite, promoting what she calls "Christian values" on sexual issues while doing nude photo shoots (and lying about that — apparently truthfulness is not a Christian value to her)."
She took a stand against gay marriage. That's her view on Christian values. She said nothing so far what her beliefs are in regards to Christian values on other issues. For all we know, she could be a liberal type of Christian, ala Obama and the Clintons, both of whom opposed gay marriage publically.
And maybe in her own mind, the shoots are not nudity. They are less revealing then what she posed on stage at the pageant and at times less revealing then the stuff SI and Victoria's Secret give out, and no one claims those are nudity.
"Then she gets caught with a sex tape that she did. "
Proof of that? I see none so far other liberal media claiming that. And we all know liberal media is very reliable (NOT!).
"Please note that no fundamentalist church would say she was acting within christian morality with that tape. "
If she did so, then yes, she would not be. The question is how long ago did she do them. It is like with the so-nude photos. We don't know when those photos took place.
Christians also believe FYI that we are not perfect or sinless just because we are Christians, nor believe we are more righteous than others. Christians can feel shame, too, if they do things wrong, and don't want others to know.
"There is an assumption that the pageant released the tape to the media which seems unlikely."
The same pageant that released confidential info about her breast implants and probably outed her on the photos?
"I would guess that whoever gave the tape to them also tried to market the tape and handed it out. One really has to be a first class bimbo to go public on a sexual morality crusade with the photos she did and the sex tape floating around. That is first class stupid."
She did not go on sexual morality crusade. She simply took a stand on gay marriage, and got a voice publically because she was attacked viciously repeatedly by the pageant, so that of course would push her further away and take a stand even stronger.
First class bimbo?
She didn't ask for any of this kind of attention in the first place. The pageant made into a public traversty by continually attacking her day in, day out. Why should she keep silence in the face of all these attacks?
Sorry, but it is not in dispute. She signed a contract that asked if she had ever posed nude or semi nude – and she responded no. See this NY Daily News article: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/05/06/2009...
Then she said, when the first set of photos came out, that they were the only ones. That turned out not to be true.
A set of photos where she exposed her breasts (nipples and all) were revealed. See http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/carrie_prejean_2 That is clearly semi-nude. Sorry, but a fact is a fact. She lied and violated her contract. But yes, it is true, the other party to the contract may, if it choses, elect to ignore contractual violations.
I was simply pointing out her lack of honesty.
Have you read the contract so that you can definitively say what the obligations of each party, including those of the pageant, are? I doubt it – I myself have only read the portions made publicly available in connection with the lawsuits. It appeared to be, in my experience as an attorney who has read hundreds of (in my judgment) similar contracts, a fairly standard employer/employee contract which is favorable to the employer. I highly doubt the contract prohibited the pageant's officials from publicly speaking about their employee. In fact, under such an agreement, the employer's only real obligation is to pay the employee and cash and prizes that are promised.
Having followed this controversy from the beginning, I am not aware of pageant officials ever publicly (or even privately) threatening her for belonging to a church that was against gay marriage. They certainly did make public their stances for gay marriage – but I don't ever recall anything negative directed at her church (although they did voice their displeasure with her speaking at a televised event at her church without the pageant's consent — as all televised appearances required the pageant's consent under the contract). Could you point out any such statements against the church for me?
Regarding her breast implants, I have 2 points (pun intended): (1) I watched the media interview with Shanna Moakler during which the interviewer asked her if the pageant paid for Carrie's breast implants and Moakler confirmed that the pageant did pay for them (i.e., the media already knew that Carrie had implants) — I, as well as many people who watched the pageant (including my friends with whom I watched the pageant on television), could tell that her breasts were not real. It was even more plainly obvious when the nude photos of her (as well as bathing suit photos of her during the Miss California pageant) allowed a comparison. (2) The US Supreme Court decision, New York Times v. Sullivan, and the decisions emanating therefrom set the standard for issues of privacy — basically, in a nutshell, public figures have a lower expectation of privacy than non-public figures and a person who says or does things in public can expect to have a lower level of privacy with respect to whatever they did or said in public. If you do not want people speculating or talking about your breast implants, you should not participate in a nationally televised contest in which you parade around in a bikini and are judged on your figure (including your breast size) – she lost all claims to privacy about the size (or realness) of her breasts by participating in the contest.
I read Carrie's lawsuit in full and nowhere did she allege that the pageant violated the contract. If she didn't think the pageant violated the contract, why would you? Perhaps you think Charles LiMandri is an incompetent attorney who failed to put in claims of contract violations in the lawsuit?
The contract was, essentially, a one-year employment contract. In exchange for the cash, prizes and an opportunity to compete at the Miss USA pageant, Carrie agreed to be bound by the terms of the contract for a year (not an unreasonable condition). After her contract was up, she could pursue her own course of action.
WOW! Very informative post…thanks!
The other thing for people to remember is her contract did NOT end "the minute the pageant was over" (as claimed by the OP. She was to serve the rest of the year as Miss California, under the terms of the contract.
You've seen the ones that show her bare breast, nipple included? And from what I've seen, Victoria's Secret models usually wear bras. It would be interesting to see examples of photos from that catalogue that outdo Ms. Prejean's.
Your welcome Carpool-Kathleen. I just thought many of Thuyen's comments were not based on fact.
Yes. I have seen the photos. Here's a link to those photos with red stars covering nipples: http://www.femininebeauty.info/carrie-prejean (I have also seen them without the red stars). In these photos, she is wearing a fairly small vest with no bra or top. They were taken in connection with a Bliss magazine spread. Dominic Pertruzzi (as identified in the link) was the photographer. She has claimed that the wind blew her top open and the photographer took the photos without her knowledge.
I frankly don't buy that argument for several reasons: (1) She's looking directly into the camera; (2) The photographer has denied it (See http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedishrag/2009/0... (3) I'm sure she signed a release giving the photographer ownership of the photos (and if there was no such release or her agreement contained a "I will not pose nude or permit the release of nude photos of me" clause, I'm sure Carrie (and Charles Limandri) would have sue the photographer and the magazine – and there is no such lawsuit, as far as I know); and (4) If you really want to be sure that a photographer doesn't photograph your breasts and nipples, common sense dictates that you would not pose wearing nothing but a small vest.
Well, Thuyen, she made a media appearance on Fox News with Sean Hannity and admitted that there was a solo sex tape. See the clip at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4A8g9cbBKc
Of course, I'm sure by coincidence, there are moments where she and Sean are plugging her book. She states that she's taking responsibility for her actions in the clip – too bad she didn't take responsibility when she was lying in her statements to the Miss California USA pageant about posing nude (and, conveniently, neither she nor Hannity discuss the fact that she clearly lied to them and, therefore, violated her contract).
PS: She claims that she was a teenager when the solo sex tape was made – which is why I believe many of the websites, such as TMZ, passed on buying it or showing it (showing, or even having in your possession, children pornography, is a crime). The photos of her in rhinestone-studded underwear were taken this year (post-breast implants) as she sent that photo to a sponsor of the pageant asking this sponsor if she was ready for the Miss USA pageant. The second set of photos, where she was exposing her breasts and nipples, were taken when she was over 18 (or else, there would be serious consequences if she was not of age – no such accusations have been forthcoming).
Hope this information further enlightens you on this controversy.
TMZ said this "sex tape" was too racy to post. They've never shown such restraint before. Now we know the real reason. Carrie was a minor at the time. Sorry TMZ and fellow Prejean bashers. I'm not going to hate on someone because they fooled around as a teenager. Big deal.
I'm not a Christian. If a beautiful women takes off her clothes, I don't say "shame on you", I say "thank you".
Carrie Prejean, in the interviews I've seen, comes across as down-to-earth and quite likeable. I wish she had a twitter or facebook account that would list her appearances in advance.
No tape huh? Nice prognostication.
You must be logged in to post a comment.