Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: Audrey Niffenegger, Bruce Joel Rubin, Eric Bana, rachel mcadams, Robert Schwentke
Posted Aug 14th 2009 at 8:59 am in Video |
20478235 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fbighollywood%2F2009%2F08%2F14%2Fthe-time-travelers-wife-opens-everywhere-today%2F%27The+Time+Traveler%27s+Wife%27+Opens+Everywhere+Today2009-08-14+15%3A59%3A19Big+Hollywoodhttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D204782
Conservatives often talk about what they don’t like about Hollywood. That’s okay, but it’s not productive. Maybe it’s time we talked about what we do like? More to the point, let’s point out when Hollywood has gotten it right. And that brings me to the...






35 Comments
Wow, the pedophiles wife. An adult knows a kid when she is 6 years old, and when she grows up, he then screws her. Now that is wonderful humanism for you. Nothing sick about that at all. Just wait until the kids grow up. How can you be an adult, know somebody as a kid, and the when they are odler have sexual feelings for them That is twisted. He should have said, hey, I am gonna hump you in the future. But lets be friends for now, till i can leave my seed in you. Wonderful movie.
Eric Bana as Hector…the only thing worthy of us smart gals watching Troy! My daughter laughed at me when we went to the movie!
I thought Bana was terrific in Black Hawk Down. Still waiting for him to appear in another movie as good as that one.
So true. Brad Pitt looked too girlie in the skirt. Bana wore it in style and then some. Which Henry VIII was Bana in? Not HBO, that was Rhys-Jones…I get Henry VIII movies mixed up. Was he in Boleyn Sisters one?
(if my husband could see me typing now!!!!!!)
I thought he was a TERRIBLE Henry VIII! Although, I grant you, it was a bad Tudor movie throughout. Not "The Tudors" bad, but very weak. Please find Keith Michell's old BBC mini "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" from the 70s & we'll talk again.
I think you got the sequence wrong. He married her then went back in time to tell her when she's a kid. Don't see what's wrong with it.
That is exactly what creeped me out, but I hadn't thought it all the way through.
That said, you are gonna get ripped up for writing it.
Eric was in the "The Other Boleyn Girl" with Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson. The movie wasn't that hot, but Eric was. (glad my husband can't see me typing either!) Anyway, the costumes are gorgeous, and the jewelry as well. A feast for the senses, so to speak. It's worth watching, to me, at least.
Yep. He was great in Munich as well. Terrific actor, and from what I understand, a very devoted husband and father as well.
I agree the movie wasn't good. I liked Eric Bana, the costumes, the jewelry and the English countryside. I didn't care about the story line or the believability of the character in this one.
I agree that is kind of freaky. I didn't read the book.
I think you are being unfair to Showtime's The Tudors. You are comparing that show to an unbelievably high standard of perfection. The new series does have some strong points (costumes and overall historical accuracy.) Are the actors very good? . . . well no, but their are several superb performances. The main problem are the stars. They go for actors who are way too hot for the actual characters. Rhys-Meyers doesn't age or gain weight, but I have followed it and not been so disappointed as you.
Aliens vs. Lame time-drama romance?
Preachy or not, I'm going with the alien movie.
The costumes are the best thing on the Tudors, too. I just think any Henry movie has to have a rock solid, virile Henry with a nasty streak. If Henry doesn't knock your socks off immediately, then what's everyone fussing about? Think of Robert Shaw's screen intro as Henry in "A Man for All Seasons," leaping off the barge as his courtiers scurry after him. Bana always comes off on screen to me as a kind, lovely man, which he is in real life. He doesn't have any innate ruthlessness to me. The historical Henry VIII, for all his kingly accomplishments always struck me as a a stone cold b@$tard.
I agree with you totally. He was totally miscast in the part, and I never saw him as Henry VIII at all, but I enjoyed him anyway.
Don't get me wrong–I watch the Tudors, but it's pure camp now. Henry's story never gets old, no matter how it gets mangled, and back in season one they fearlessly admitted "the Tudors" wasn't going to be worried about silly things like historical accuracy. (at least they gave Henry his nasty leg ulcer) "The Other Boleyn Girl," however, was based on a good, accurate, well-researched book which I enjoyed immensely. And for the most part it has a very competent cast that I've enjoyed in lots of other movies. I just think they did a terrible adaptation of it. Wrecking something good is much more of a letdown than something you know is going to be silly going in.
I have compared The Tudors against the Alison Weir books and have actually been impressed with their historical accuracy (with a couple of notable exceptions such as the first marriage of Henry's sister.)
Check out _The Castle_ next time it's on IFC or Sundance (can't remember which is which).. He's got a funny supporting part..
Yes – Kennedy was great; they would never do totally pocked and homely with A. of C. Thanks for recommendation on Sansom – sounds great. I keep timing out so reply is abbreviated
He does wait until she grows up, you know.
Oh well. I have to be honest.
Sigh….. I'm very happily married, but can I drool over Eric Bana? Loved him as Henry VIII, and Hector in Troy. Not great movies, but who cares? I suppose I'll have to see this when it comes out on DVD, or pay-per-view.
You have great taste! What about that braided hair on Hector? Lord have Mercy! Brad Pitt? Was Brad in it too? Did NOT notice.
Bana was in The Other Boleyn Girl, which was pretty bad, IMHO. Jonathan Rhys Meyers plays Henry on Showtime's "The Tudors" which is so craptastically bad it's wonderful.
You mean the two sisters of his they renamed & fused into one so as not to "confuse" we foolish Americans? Or the fact that they lost the actor playing Cranmer last season so all his actions have been put on someone else? Some stuff I understand, like tweaking ages–Brandon's wife was ickily much younger than he, I believe. Having said that, Maria Doyle Kennedy was a wonderful Katherine of Aragon, and Natalie Dormer improved greatly from s1 to 2. Joss Stone was a fine (but far from homely) Anne of Cleves and they're being really, really nice to Mary. And I look forward to Joely Richardson as Katherine Parr next season. If only Rhys Meyers would just get even a _little_ better!
I will take this moment to continue to recommend C.J. Sansom's excellent Matthew Shardlake mystery novels that take place during this period. The first one is "Dissolution." Henry himself doesn't appear, but his influence is felt throughout. Shardlake is a hunchbacked lawyer charged by Thomas Cromwell to investigate some nefarious doings at a soon-to-be-dissolved monastery.
I want to know if they ever explain why he travels through time. Does he work for the government? He he a cooky scientist? Scott Bacula? An alien? Or is it all just some dumb "magical" plot gimic?
I want to know if they ever explain why he travels through time. Does he work for the government? Is he a cooky scientist? Scott Bacula? An alien? Or is it all just some dumb "magical" plot gimic?
It's explained as a hereditary medical issue. Throughout much of the book he is searching for a doctor who can help. Of course, since he's bouncing around in time, he ends up meeting for the first time a doctor he's known for years.
I'm not sure how well this book will translate to the screen. In the book, it is alternately narrated by the protagonist and his wife. Each section begins by giving a date, and the current ages of the two. In book form, this allows you to keep straight what's going on. As a movie, this could very easily just get confusing.
It's a cute book and worth a read. Not an incredibly important, life-changing work of literature. But an enjoyable read and a cute story.
It's explained as a hereditary medical issue. Throughout much of the book he is searching for a doctor who can help him to control it. Of course, since he's bouncing around in time, he ends up meeting for the first time a doctor he's known for years.
I'm not sure how well this book will translate to the screen. In the book, it is alternately narrated by the protagonist and his wife. Each section begins by giving a date, and the current ages of the two. In book form, this allows you to keep straight what's going on. As a movie, this could very easily just get confusing.
It's a cute book and worth a read. Not an incredibly important, life-changing work of literature. But an enjoyable read and a cute story.
Yeah Troy sucked dooky but Bana was cool. I go back and forth with him. For every Hector and Hoot he has played, we get a whiney insufferable cry baby in Munich. I am intriguied by this movie.
maatkare-I def think Bana's Henry 8 movie was bad (b/c I have read the history books) but you gotta love the Boleyn played as real naughty gals. So sick of whitewashing them!!!
As to Bana–he looks good. ha-ha!
"camp" You nailed it!!!
I usually get bored with magic movies but may have to rent this!!
I am probably the only one here that was not in love with the book (Time Travelers Wife). It was confusing, yet intriguing in the beginning, then… I just lost interest and wished he would travel and get lost in space and time… or that he would get into a car accident or get the crap beat out of him and die. Yes, I am mean.
I thought it was superficial silly bunkum.
OK, pelt me with negative votes.
I tried to watch and so wanted to love The Tutors. Argh – it was just insufferable. The acting, the writing! NOOO!
Agreed that The Other Boleyn Sister was crap. I liked the book though. If you ever are tempted to read "The Other Queen" by Phillipa Gregory – consider this a gift: Run. As fast as you can and as far as possible in the other direction.
You must be logged in to post a comment.