Larry King was a jerk during the interview. He asked her a question she legally could not answer, and when she informed him of this, he kept asking and wouldn't stop. You don't see them doing this to Trump who also can't legally answer. Then Liberal Larry King had a caller attack her even though King's people had made a deal with her that they wouldn't have her talk to callers. If the liberal media were not out to destroy Prejean, the liberal media wouldn't be pretending she didn't handle the attack interview very well, and they wouldn't be pretending that Larry King was not acting horribly and dishonestly.

On the first hand, you have an unborn baby. A human that has blood, a heart, brain, fingers and toes and feel pain. Just like you and me! However, to liberals, none of that matters because they're on the inside and dependent on their mother. Despite the fact that they have all these characteristics of a person, they're merely a clump of cells until they come shooting out the birth canal. To conservatives, by contrast, they are babies from conception, who get no say in what happens to *their* body in the "choice" that's made by the mother and crowed so loudly by the pro-abortion crowd.

Contrast that with a man who made it out of the birth canal alive (the libs didn't get to him first), who lived their life, who was given the chance to make choices that affect their life, and chose poorly by going on a 20 tranny killing spree spanning 7 states. We conservatives believe in accountability for one's actions and being held responsible and dealing with consequences. In the case of killing sprees and other vile crimes, we believe that a just consequence is death. The liberal, on the other hand, see the killer as a poor victim, that if we had just seen the warning signs and realized that as a child he grew up with a father who, in his off hours from being a clown in the circus, he performed as a tranny in Vegas dance shows and that his 20 tranny killing spree was justified. We just need to understand him.

So, you see, there's a difference between an unborn baby who doesn't get a say in his life and is dependent on us to protect it, and a cold-blooded killer who made piss-poor decisions that led to just consequences. Not even close.

When pro-lifers begin believing the killing of whole people groups is A-OK, get back to me. When the mainstream pro-life movement believes that the killing of people who perform abortions is A-OK (note, mainstream pro-life movement, not deranged people who twist and believe what they're doing somehow furthers the cause. No one who truly believes in life condoned Mr. Tiller's murder), then we'll talk. Hell, I'll even give you that when the pro-life movement demands the death penalty for jaywalkers, stop-sign runners, and thieves, you'll have a point. But until then, everytime you try to make some parallel between unborn innocent human life and people convicted of a heinous crime and sentenced to die, you sound like an unthinking Obamadrone who can't come up with a well-reasoned argument..

Maybe you can tell me why liberals are so gung-ho about protecting the right of a woman to kill her unborn baby, but yet bend over backwards to protect trees and whales and in some states people have to get permission to cut down trees on their own property. Where's the "choice" in that?