Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Posted Jun 2nd 2009 at 5:10 am in Live Blog | 14927433 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fbighollywood%2F2009%2F06%2F02%2Fopen-thread-tuesday%2FOpen+Thread+Tuesday2009-06-02+12%3A10%3A22Big+Hollywoodhttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D149274
----- Here's a link to Cherry Tree Media. Politico: Has the culture war made its way to our children’s iPads? Allan Covert is putting out digital children’s books through Cherry Tree Media that a publicist describes as being “filled with patriotic, American values story themes.” But Covert...







33 Comments
Is there validity to the anti-tax arguments? Apart from the police powers, is there a law that requires citizens to pay their taxes?
Was the 16th ammendment properly ratified?
I don't have enough information to have a stance, I was hoping for some insight and clarification.
(Don't do it is a dirty song. But I was too young to understand it at the time. Now I understand it, but just don't care. I like the song.)
"Colors" was a phenomenally good movie. I remember thinking about Mark Fuhrman, the L.A. policeman who was put on "trial" during the O.J. Simpson case for past situations involving alleged racial epithets, and how he had required counseling due to an alleged nervous breakdown. My point is, "Colors" brought home for me an increased appreciation of just how dangerous their job is, and how the stress of that job could easily cause a person to sometimes utter unkind racial remarks they might not otherwise even think let alone make. There were two incredibly good actors as leads in that movie, one of whom is actually also a good guy.
This movie was where I first heard the story about the young bull and the old bull.
Maria Conchita Alonzo destroyed every scene she was in……
If the abortionist Tiller was the monster he was characterized as being by pro-lifers, then why all the lamentations by them? I'm pro-life; I believe that Roe V. Wade was just judges making up stuff; and the fact that Tiller was slain, in a church, doesn't bother me. I don't advocate it, but it doesn't bother me in the way that an abortion doesn't bother anyone in the abortion crowd.
What bothers me is the way that so called pro-lifers in the media are ducking and running for cover over Tiller's demise. Is there not one of them who dares to say he doesn't give a rat's ass about that abortionist, or any of them for that matter.
True. Robert Duvall is a giant. Penn was good in this one, but his character was a bit of a jerk so I guess it wasn´t a stretch.
I have a problem with any fellow American being shot to death in his church. It's domestic terrorism, pure and simple. The anti-abortioners who spent years decrying Tiller, posting his photo, address etc. on their sites, know they stand a pretty good chance of being sued for instigating his murder, hence the crocodile tears.
So what do you think of the two soldiers that were shot in Arkansas? The scumbag admitted that he did it because he hates the miitary. GIVE ME A BREAK!
Sorry to disagree, but I thought "Colors" was an awful movie. It was a total waste of my time, as is Sean Penn. Fortunately, it's been so long since I've seen the movie, I've forgotten it, except how much I hated it when I saw it.
So send him some flowers.
Bill Ayers is taking calls on C-SPAN2 BookTV this Sunday and Monday. I know I have some things to say to him.
http://www.booktv.org/program.aspx?ProgramId=1055... Depth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWMIwziGrAQ
Not you oldsoldier, Joconde.
I didn't think it refered to me but a funny response all the same.
To be fair, you can be mad about that and worried about the Tiller murder at the same time. What happened to Tiller bothers me because we should not solve our problems through assassination.
We already know what happens next: The killer will get his punishment and the left will try to make Tiller a hero or martyr. Meanwhile, we will hear much less about soldiers who served in a noble cause and were murdered by a muslim convert, as far as we know at this time. And that bothers me on a wholly different level.
Honestly, I don't find myself being worked up over Tiller one way or another. And truthfully, solving problems through assassignation (character or other) has been recognized as being effective since at least Machiavelli. Granted, it can in no way be construed as an excuse but it is what it is.
I am certain that the FBI investigation will be dropped on orders from DOJ in the same way that the Black Panthers case. Wouldn't want to offend the muslims now, would we?
You are absolutely correct. It sickens me that this happened. And it should sicken anyone who calls himself a God-fearing or God-loving person. Encouraging or justifying the actions of murderers is not Christian or loving and honoring your God. It helps no one and hurts all of us when we accept or justify murder as a any kind of viable option. We must all calm down and figure out a way to get back to civility and open civil discourse in this country or we will be lost.
Also revolting. Also domestic terrorism. I didn't even need to read the suspects name to know he was Muslim, and he's doubly revolting because he's apparently a jailhouse convert.
The Founders didn't want there to be an income tax the way we have it today. The 16th Amendment was one of the worst things to happen to our COTUS. Even then, we had a chance to stage a tax revolt because we still held onto our tax money ourselves and paid it in at the end of the year at tax time. FICA withholding did not come along until WWII where the government was so running behind in income that it instituted FICA as a temporary measure to get the money it needed right away. Then, at the end of the war, even though FICA was no longer needed, the complacent people and government apparently decided they liked the arrangement as opposed to the responsibility of having to save back their tax liability. Now, if we want to stage a tax revolt, it makes things decidedly harder.
I would call it heinous, but I wouldn't call it terrorism. The guy who did it knew exactly who he was after, and there is so far no sign that he was attempting to influence anything other than stopping Tiller's practice by killing Tiller. I call that cold-blooded murder, but not terrorism. Until we have evidence that this is part of a larger movement, I can't see this as anything but a single, targetted incident.
I think the random shooting of the soldiers outside the recruiting station terrorism. The guy who did that just went looking for random targets to shoot. That implies more of an attempt to terrorize people through random violence.
@joconde
I'll take this one.
At heart, the pro-life movement is Christian so we have to response as Christ would. First, murder is wrong because every person is created in His image.
"You shall not murder."
–Exodus 20:13
Second, God doesn't take pleasure in the death of the wicked and neither should we
"Do I have any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?” says the Lord GOD, “and not that he should turn from his ways and live?"
–Ezekiel 18:23
Third, we must love, not hate, those who support abortion:
"But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil."
–Luke 6:35
Forgive them:
"For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins."
–Matthew 6:14-15
And pray for them:
"But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you."
–Matthew 5:44
Hence, it would be hypocritical for me or any other pro-lifer to cheer Tiller's death instead of mourn with his family. That's like Martin Luther King applauding the murder of Klansman instead of weeping over the senseless loss of a fellow human being.
PART 1 of 2:
First off, I think "Colors" is a superb movie, capturing a place and time about as well as a filmmaker can. Dennis Hopper makes you feel like you're in East L.A. (where I live) and South Central (which I once drove through really fast) circa 1988.
What redeems the film completely is the Sean Penn characters growth arc. He goes from cowboy to mature cop. Lazy filmmakers would've seen him killed or causing a tragedy. The film's very, very restrained in this way and the scene at the end where Penn's character has to pretty much deal with himself in the form of a rookie partner, is a humorous and good-natured irony. Splendid.
Maria Conchita Alonzo gets unfair criticism. She's a terrific actress whose always been convincing in her roles — something Meryl Streep hasn't been able to say since 1997.
CONTD—-
PART 2 of 2:
The problem with her role is that it isn't written right. Her final scene, "Look at me PacMan!", comes off as melodramatic because there was nothing written to establish that side of her character in her earlier scenes. It's an off-key character moment, not because of Conchita Alonzo, but because the storytellers let an otherwise fine actress down.
Finally, the Watts Towers tracking shot near the end deserves better recognition. One of the best shots of the 80s.
Hopper should re-mix some of the soundtrack, the real 80's synthesizer stuff — replace it and release a new edition. He'd a have a film that would never feel dated. Only the score hurts it in that way.
I'd buy it.
In the old days, people tended to keep their politics to themselves, and for the longest time most actors did so as well. In the new era, and particularly in the past eight years, many liberal actors felt the soapbox granted by their celebrity status gave them particular license to pour out their political vitriol. Now these celebrities are wealthy and choose to support organizations and politicians with which I firmly disagree. That's all fine, but then I feel if I put money in their pocket, I am indirectly contributing to those organizations. On the other hand, what is wrong with mentioning an actor is good but is also a jerk. You just assumed it was due to his politics. Really who gives a crap what either you or I have to say, for that matter. It's just a blog
Let's not conflate the meaning of "not lamenting" with "taking pleasure in". Oh, and here are a few more scriptures that you could have posted, if you weren't so loving of the bad doctor.
"Anyone who welcomes this little child in my name welcomes me"
–Luke 9:48
"Let the little children come to me, and do not stop them; for it to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs.
–Luke18:16
"When the wicked are on the increase, sin multiplies, but the upright will witness their downfall."
Proverbs 29:16
I would argue against remixing it. It's entirely of its' day. Why change it? It's pure 80's. While it's a competent film, and a pretty comprehensive snapshot of the time, it suffers from many films that tie themselves too close to a particular date & time. Like many of the other 'hood flicks (and I worked on a few) it looks painfully dated and preachy today. (and c'mon–any movie where people have beepers instead of cell phones looks woefully out of date) I remember seeing it in the day and Conchita Alonso's character was roundly and audibly mocked in the scene you mention. And then it was pretty much overshadowed by the rash of 'hood flicks deemed more "authentic" because they were made by, well, black directors who had actually grown up in the 'hood.
Colors was a great movie about the LAPD of yester-year. Even Sean Penn couldn't ruin it. Duvall was superb in it. As usual.
Colors was a great movie about the LAPD of yester-year. Even Sean Penn couldn't ruin it. Duvall was superb in it. As usual.
I am still not receiving emails when people reply to my comments. Anyone else having this problem?
No, that´s not the point. Unlike, say, painters or game programmers, actors live by their face and name. Penn insisted on linking his face and name with his politics, using his fame to push his imbecilic opinions on me. It´s not my damn fault that I cannot watch him now without thinking of what he so very publicly stands for. That was his professional choice.
And it is telling that you couldn´t find a better example than James Woods. I guess in your world publicly supporting Republicans is equal to visiting and fawning over murderous thugs like Castro and Chavez? Yes or no?
I absolutely concede that he can be a very good actor and director. But that´s not enough. Actor are brands. Brand x may be a good gadget but if you knew the manufacturer killed children in Africa, it would matter to you, wouldn´t it?
I have been to Cuba and I know what Penn supports and I say that´s an appropriate comparison and screw him. Screw him like this illiterate Hollywood millionaire screws the people who must live under these regimes. His acting is nothing to me.
Yes, and my number hasn't changed for eons.
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.