Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: Dennis Quaid, GI Joe: The Movie, Stephen Sommers, The Mummy
Posted May 10th 2009 at 1:31 pm in Entertainment |
13098287 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fbighollywood%2F2009%2F05%2F10%2Fgi-joe-hits-theatres-august-7th%2F%27GI+Joe%27+Hits+Theatres+August+7th2009-05-10+20%3A31%3A04Big+Hollywoodhttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D130982
Conservatives often talk about what they don’t like about Hollywood. That’s okay, but it’s not productive. Maybe it’s time we talked about what we do like? More to the point, let’s point out when Hollywood has gotten it right. And that brings me to the...






87 Comments
[...] [There is a video that cannot be displayed in this feed. Visit the blog entry to see the video.] [...]
I'm not excited in the least…
They brought down the Eiffel Tower? Well, that's a change at least. Is that France's wake-up call? Can't tell anything about where the plot is going from the trailer. Will there also be shots of the entire Middle East dancing in the streets celebrating the destruction of a French iconic landmark? Will the bad guys turn out to be neo-Nazis? Is GI Joe gay? Did the French wave a white flag and then give GIs permission to save their sorry asses? I think we need more information.
Is it just me or was there very little in the trailer to tell you it was GI Joe (the only things I could see were naming Gen Hawk, the brief glimpse of Snake Eyes and Stormshadow, and the fact they said it was GI Joe at the end of the movie).
It looks very unintersting.
I second the brilliant genius of Dr. Nic. What is it with all these remakes being done by people who apparently have no clue about the original? This flick just screams "Generic Action Flick!" Stealing character names from my childhood does not count as "making a G.I. Joe flick." Hell, I'll just watch the original G.I. Joe flick. You can't beat the musical number they opened with.
I second the brilliant genius of Dr. Nic. What is it with all these remakes being done by people who apparently have no clue about the original? This flick just screams "Generic Action Flick!" Stealing character names from my childhood does not count as "making a G.I. Joe flick." Hell, I'll just watch the original G.I. Joe flick. You can't beat the musical number they opened with.
I recognized Scarlet, General Hawk (only because he mentioned his name), & the Baroness (Destro's lover); overall, it looks to be a watered down version of the G.I. Joe I remember. I also read G.I. Joe is not an American force, but an International force. Where's Cobra Commander? He should have been easy.
I forgot to mention Snake Eyes & Storn Shadow….
COBRA has to do more than take down the Eiffel Tower to invoke terror.
I have a sneaking suspicion that in the end, Team America is going to have to clean up the whole mess anyway.
I'm not a huge GIJoe guy…But I don't ever recall seing them use those iron-man-suit-things. And they looked pretty darned goofy… As for the rest, looks mildly intriging.
My kids are 6 and 9; they like the trailer, in part because that is all I let them see; too many duds out now a days. If I buy or borrow the DVD, I feel better, especially when they throw in the sucker punch moment (I know this sight has abetter name for it, but it slips my mind).
Read in Stage Right's piece that Billy Eliot, which I had some interest in, has a musical number wishing for Margaret Thatcher's death; unbelievable how vile and loathsome some of these "entertainment"types have become. And the Star Trek TNG castoff costumes are also a bit much; I'm already sick of seeing Sienna Miller's decollage, and that is just from watching the previews.
The only thing that makes this remotely interesting is the eventual Rifftrax that will be done on this movie. Now that is gonna be good.
Marlon Wayans immediately sinks the value of any film.
Alright folks, let's start counting things that are wrong.
1. Accelerator 7 (or whatever) suits. The entire concept is like they're trying to turn GI Joe into 5 or so Iron Man suits. Bad.
2. Destro as the bad guy. Although he was supposed to be a bit of a bumbler, Cobra Commander is the real bad guy
3. The entire look of the weapons and the like. Nuff said.
4. Everyone wearing tigh black leather uniforms. S&M Special Forces. Wohoo.
5. CGI hell. Did they not learn from Star Wars prequels?
I absolutely love it. The underwater facility looks great, and Sommers said he wanted that scene to be like the ending of Thunderball — in fact, I remember reading that he wanted to give the whole film a feel similar to that of the James Bond pics of that era.
The accelerator suits seem like something that would be in a G.I. Joe story, so I'm glad they're introducing something different to the mythos.
And I don't understand all the fuss about the team being sent all over the world — it's not a U.N. peacekeeping force, but clearly a U.S. special forces unit that will intervene anywhere in the world where elements may threaten civilization.
This just seems like it's going to be like Mission: Impossible or James Bond stuff … but with Snake-Eyes (played by Ray Park!!!) and Stormshadow.
I can't wait.
I hope you're right. I'm betting against it, though. We know this industry too well.
Until I hear otherwise I will assume the movie is replete with political correctness and leftwing internationalist sucker punches. As long as we keep buying their tickets they'll keep pumping it out. I'll take a huge pass, thanks.
Yeah … don't get me wrong — I share your pessimism. I just think that it could surprise people.
If I remember correctly, people were hesitant when the first footage of Iron Man was released, and it showed him evading U.S. fighter jets.
There was even a little apprehension around the Dark Knight when at the end of Batman Begins, Gordon showed the joker card, while warning of "escalation."
I don't think there's any way this film is going to be a rallying point for the conservative movement, but I do think it will be an innocuous piece of popcorn filmmaking.
Destro is a bad guy, but second in command to Cobra Commander. A power struggle exists between Cobra Commander & Destro. At least this is what I remember from the cartoon.
I know the "Cobra Commander" if that's what they're calling him, is the European-Irish sounding guy near the start wanting to launch the warheads.
Combine that with the earlier rumors of "international super-force", then the rebuttal by Hasbro Inc., I predict yet another example of Hollywood urinating all over the memories of 80's kids like me
I was a big fan of the cartoon, which actually had some adult plots and themes that could be mined for a great movie based on the cartoon. Instead, I hear that this is an "international" team headquartered in Belgium. So much for "A Real American Hero."
The rumor's I've read is that in the movie, they are "Global Integrated Joint Operating Entity" headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. Gotta appeal to that international anti-American market.
There's been a lot of dodging around as to what the plot of this actually is, but the trailers and the early merchandise seem to suggest that Destro is the main bad guy for this one and that the film-proper will follow the track of an origin-story for Cobra Commander. (You can see the title is subtitled "Rise of Cobra.")
Accelerator 7 (or whatever) suits. The entire concept is like they're trying to turn GI Joe into 5 or so Iron Man suits. Bad.
Flat-out wrong, buddy. Powered armour's been a part of the G.I. Joe mythos for decades now, as have unmanned attack drones, infantry-portable laser weapons, jetpacks, geneetically-engineered super-soldiers…
I was a big fan of the cartoon, which actually had some adult plots and themes that could be mined for a great movie
You can't be that big a fan, if you don't recognize that Cobra attacking the Eiffel tower is lifted directly from the first G.I. Joe cartoon mini-series "The M.A.S.S. Device".
I heard they had to scrap that because too many people complained about it, so GI Joe went back to the US. I'm betting they had to keep most of what they shot so there are only minor changes to let us know he's still a real American Hero. If what I heard is true …
the suits are way too much like iron man
I'm reserving judgement for now, but it looks entertaining. If it can maintain a pro-military stance I'll be pleased.
I think the Middle East owns the Eiffel tower now, so, no it did not come down. It will however, be rededicated as Allah's Phallic.
Anybody know where Salmon Rushdie is hiding.
From the director of Van Helsing and The Mummy 2 and a scene stolen from Team America.
No, I got that. I'm talking more about the characters and personality which, once you put them in CGI suits, doesn't seem to be the focus of the movie.
Since US movies now make more money overseas than in the US, I was wondering how long it would take for the plots to go Euro-centric. Of course the average politics have been Euro oriented for some time, this is just the next step.
I'm just hoping that, at some point in the movie, they show someone wearing a "Help Computer" t-shirt. Or, at the very least, have a scene in a cafeteria where they're selling Pork Chop Sandwiches…;-).
Zartan & the Dreadnoks need to make an appearance…
G.I. Joe–like Transformers–is personality driven; without this, G.I. Joe becomes a very basic boring film no matter who is in it.
Arnold Vosloo is Zartan. I'm not sure if they properly made him look like Alice Cooper. I have no idea about the rest of the Dreadnoks.
Another thing that just struck me. What drove G.I. Joe was the comedy – from Cobra Commander giving an interview in which he recalls having led a mutiny at his military academy, to the entire "The Viper is Coming" episode. This doesn't look like it has any of that.
To call this a remake of G.I. Joe is like calling "Lost" a remake of "Gilligan's Island."
I'll be sittin front row center nursing the extra large box of buttered popcorn. Dr Who is the bad guy, awesome. Then I'll hold my breath for Transformers. Maybe Sam Witwiky will get stepped on bringing this arc to a satifying close.
No, I got that. I'm talking more about the characters and personality which, once you put them in CGI suits, doesn't seem to be the focus of the movie.
Oh please. You're talking about a franchise in which characters and personality have always been secondary considerations to the need to showcase as many of Hasbro's nifty new toys (avaiable at a retailer near you!) as possible.
Another thing that just struck me. What drove G.I. Joe was the comedy – from Cobra Commander giving an interview in which he recalls having led a mutiny at his military academy, to the entire "The Viper is Coming" episode. This doesn't look like it has any of that.
That's funny… The reaction on many of the various G.I. Joe forums to interviews with the cast and crew has been complaints that it looks as though there'll be too much comedy in the film, that they won't take it seriously enough.
Having listened and read about various writers talking about writing for children's television during that period, they often did their best to work around the need to showcase toys. In the case of GI Joe, for example, they had episodes dealing with one of the Joes being blackmailed with threats to family members and another episode (and follow-up) dealing with a Mission Impossible-style mind game with one of the Joes. They also had some fun stuff like the Joe's rebuilding an orphanage and telling the kids stories including "The Three Little Joes" (the first Joe build his bunker out of straw, the second Joe built his bunker out of wood, the third Joe build his bunker out of reinforced concrete with overlapping fire…") and The Man from Auntie with a pretty funny James Bond parody in it. Not bad for a show designed to sell toys.
See also Sebastian Shaw's comment about the show being "personality driven". It wasn't toy driven.
In case anyone here missed it, during the election G4 ran some parodies with Cobra Commander running for President, including an excellent parody of the "Yes We Can" music video called "Yes We Shall". Some examples here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzrd6eVAsjA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-edqQl0pZw
Those rumors are untrue.
They will be based in the Pit, so don't worry about all of that.
Those rumors are untrue.
They will be based in the Pit, so don't worry about all of that.
No it is not.
No doubt G.I. Joe and team are on Napolitano's watch list.
Um, excuse me. I'm 51 and grew up with G.I. Joe. Had all of the military branch uniforms, had the space capsule, many vehicles, and just a ton of weaponry. I'm so old school G.I. Joe that I thought Hasbro jumped the shark with, "lifelike hair." Would someone – anyone – please explain to me how what I just watched has anything at all to do with G.I. Joe? The G.I. Joe that I know? Because so far as I can tell, the answer to my question could only be, "Nothing whatsoever."
Now that I think about it, I should have provided the context for "Help Computer" and "Pork Chop Sandwiches"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ias31By60N8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKT-pShQC7A&fe...
How about launching GI Joe as what he was ORIGINALLY! An ordinary United States GI. In olive drab fatigues. How about placing him in the middle of the Battle of the Bulge? Or as a Marine at the defense of Khe Shan? Or a sailor on board USS Yorktown during the Battle of Midway? What's wrong with putting a "great American hero" in the middle of one of America's great heroic battles? Too hip for the room I guess?
http://shermansmarch.blogspot.com
Those who want a nice update of the '80s-era cartoon combined with the grittiness of the Hama-penned comics need to check out G.I. Joe: Resolute, viewable here until the 15th.
Isn't that Christopher Eccleston as the bad guy at the beginning? Probably shallow of me, but, being a Doctor Who fan, that immediately piqued my interest. Don't know what to expect from the whole film. I watched the cartoon as a kid and enjoyed it, but I'm not sure I'll recognize much of it in this. Might be a fun popcorn flick, though.
Yeah I bet thats what Tom Clancy was thinking when he wrote Rainbow 6 too, right? *rolls eyes*
No, thats Destro. I dont get what everyone has against it being an international force, do you also cry about something like NATO being in other films? Though in the case of the U.N. its completely justified, what a mess that is.
Happy to hear that.
This is the ONLY thing I actively want from this movie: A single scene towards the end of the second act (i.e. the mandatory "everything just went to hell, regroup and go get `em" bridge) wherein a defeated and demoralized main character (Duke, probably) is brooding to his ally and/or superior (Quaid, ideally) about all the various hard lessons he's learned in the course of his character arc; a sombre-yet-intensely-masculine monologue of regret and resolve that ends with a hard swallow and a determined declaration of "…now I know." At which point ally and/or superior gravely nods, places a firm hand upon his shoulder and sagely intones: "Knowing… is half the battle." Cue swell of main-theme, montage of weapons-readying, slow-mo hero group-walk toward camera.
They pull that, I'm in the bag. That's all there is to it
Thanks for that. Didn't realize that was on. That was just about perfect except that they killed one of my four favorite Joes, put Shipwreck in the sweater and knit hat, and Low-Light wasn't quite right.
Kewl. Is that Gov. Sarah Palin’s first movie? I’m a big fan of hers.
Guess what everyone? I have been working on the video game for the movie. And, unlike most movie video games, it does not retell the same story from the movie. Instead, it tells a new story that takes place after the movie.
Even more suprising…the game is actually fun. I know because I have been playing it everyday for the last year and I still enjoy it. Now, it is not going to be a ground-breaking, triple-A title that sets the industry on fire. But, if you enjoyed GI Joe growing up or if you have young kids that you want to game with, I think you will like our game.
Here's a trailer:
http://www.ea.com/videos/4c6edd94561a0210VgnVCM10...
Check it out and please don't hate on it.
BTW, here are some answer to some of the questions that I have seen in this thread:
1) Cobra Commander is in the movie and the game. Although, he has a new look.
2) Christopher Eccleston (Dr. Who) plays Destro.
3) In the game, Destro has a pretty big role. I am not sure about the movie but would assume so.
4) Not all of the GI Joe team are Americans. However, I have seen nothing about Belgium being their HQ.
5) The movie and game are not intended to be realistic in anyway. If you remember the toys and cartoons, a lot of the equipment and vehicles are over-the-top bordering on ridiculous.
You called it. Why do you think I'm in Asia?
He frickin' vaporized Moscow…
Um, excuse me. I'm 51 and grew up with G.I. Joe. Had all of the military branch uniforms, had the space capsule, many vehicles, and just a ton of weaponry. I'm so old school G.I. Joe that I thought Hasbro jumped the shark with, "lifelike hair." Would someone – anyone – please explain to me how what I just watched has anything at all to do with G.I. Joe?
Sure thing. What you just watched has to do with G.I. Joe, an elite, top-secret counter-terrorism team, fighting Cobra, a ruthless terrorist organization determined to rule the world as the old Sunbow cartoons put it, but my father could probably tell you that. He's roughly your age, but having got me into the whole world of G.I. Joe right from the moment I was old enough to play with the small 1/18th-scale toys that replaced the original 1/6th-scale action figures, he's well aware that since 1983, "G.I. Joe" has primarily been about the aforementioned sci-fi counter-terrorism setting, at least as far as the manufacturer and owner of the licences is concerned.
Looks like a fun movie though…and Army son thinks it will be fun too.
Looks great — I will definitely be picking up this game.
GI Joe: A real transnational hero?
thank you. Was wondering who else would notice how much of a direct copy that is!
I don't object to the suites.
Recognize that GI Joe was equally a cartoon, a comic book and a line of toys. As a kid, to me, the vehicles were probably the most important thing. From the previews, it looks like they give a good amount of screen time to vehicle-based action.
And so buy making the characters have these "iron man" get ups, they put the characters on closer to equal ground with the action vehicles… which is appropriate.
Yeah, but here's what I can't quite wrap my head around. Christopher Eccleston quits Dr Who after one series because, by most accounts, he didn't find playing the Time Lord creatively satisfying.
*This* is what he decided to do instead!?! This is a better use of his talent than playing Dr Who!?!
It's got to be the paycheck.
Oh.My.Gosh!
I just choked on my lunch!! :p
I have heard you guys are purists and that can be a good thing when it comes to being true to books and in this case a comic book hero/cartoon. However, IF this movie is pro-military, and in particular pro-killing the bad guys and not so pure; I am still for it. As you all know, there have been far too many anti-military movies and the guys deserve a break no matter how impure the movie might be to the G.I. Joe origins.
So far, I would probably go to see it unless of course it does have any leftists themes.
As aside, my girls voted Barbie off toy island and demanded G.I. Joes from Santa. Until we got them some Chinese and Russian bad guys; Barbie was the bad guy! LOL!
w00t!
This is not based on the G.I. Joe you remember, but the 80's revamp with "Star Wars" sized figures that now had an enemy, named Cobra. With the exception of the figure that came with the first G.I. Joe jeep the two series are completely different.
Major Fail on so many levels.
This is not G.I Joe, this is hollywood remaking it in their own vision. I am going to pass on this mess in the making and wait for it to hit USA Channel where it belongs with the Fantastic Four movie they run every other week.
Actually you are wrong, power suits were not STANDARD issue in any of the Joe cartoon or comic series.
No, he gets surgery to impersonate the US President (played by Brit actor Jonathan Pryce).
apparently you're basing your perception of Joe solely on the 1985-86 cartoon, which was only a portion of the franchise. following the prior 1960s incarnation, the Reagan update included G.I. Joe novels and a Joe comic book from 1982 onward which was one of Marvel's top sellers; that comic was written by the same guy who created the bio-cards on the back packages of the figures. The tone of the comic books and novels was sharper than the cartoon, something akin more to James Cameron's "True Lies"
in the screenplay i read last year, Scarlett was Australian, Snake Eyes was French, Breaker was Moroccan, and the HQ was under the Egyptian desert. There were a few Americans (Hawk, Duke, Ripcord) on loan to NATO, but it definitely was a foreign version of G.I. Joe. Cobra Commander was an ex-pal of Duke's. Most of the "humor" was Marlon Wayan's witty one-liners as he attempted to earn Scarlett's romantic affections.
This movie resembles the classic Joe franchise only to the extent that Lucas' modern SW prequels resembled the classic trilogy.
yes
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
minecraft skins Thanks erstwhile many for intercourse this online. I darling every bit of it….
Thanks erstwhile many for intercourse this online. I darling every bit of it….
puppy breeders The model of these blogging engines and CMS platforms is the lack of limitations and palliate of manipulation that allows developers to apply abundant acceptance and ‘skin’ the in a way that with very try one would never observe what i…
The model of these blogging engines and CMS platforms is the lack of limitations and palliate of manipulation that allows developers to apply abundant acceptance and ‘skin’ the in a way that with very try one would never observe what it is making the s…
You must be logged in to post a comment.