Breitbart on ‘Real Time With Bill Maher’
by Big HollywoodHere’s the YouTube video from Andrew’s appearance last night on “Real Time” presented in three parts.
–
–
More below the fold…
–
–
Here’s the YouTube video from Andrew’s appearance last night on “Real Time” presented in three parts.
–
–
More below the fold…
–
–
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
|
Tags: Andrew Breitbart, evolution, racism, Real Time with Bill Maher, Religion, Rush Limbaugh
Posted Mar 14th 2009 at 3:00 pm in Political Humor, Video |
80014695 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2Fbighollywood%2F2009%2F03%2F14%2Fandrew-breitbart-on-real-time-with-bill-maher%2FBreitbart+on+%27Real+Time+With+Bill+Maher%272009-03-14+22%3A00%3A45Big+Hollywoodhttp%3A%2F%2Fbighollywood.breitbart.com%2F%3Fp%3D80014
The reports and books that were timed with Reagan’s 100th birthday last February tended to mention the Hollywood years as a mere afterthought. Moreover, most Reagan biographers typically focus on the more well-known movies such as “Kings Row and “Knute Rockne.” But there are several films worth revisiting...






695 Comments
No code word needed… Mr. Dyson is a racist. Great Job Andrew.
Any white person that wants to experience real racism and see exactly what the problem is simply needs to walk through the inner cities at night. My job requires me to do it – in Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens – between 9pm and 5am – 5 nights a week – alone – and I'm not a cop and have no gun. You wouldn't believe the treatment whitey receives. You wouldn't believe your eyes.
As a Georgetown alum, I am completely ashamed that man is affiliated with my school…what a disgraceful scumbag Dyson is.
You're a brave man for entering that den of distorted logic. I find it impossible to watch BM.
Is a picture of Maher's ugly mug the best anyone could come up with?
I don't know what's more annoying about this show: filibustering from the liberal guests, snarkiness from Maher, and an audience that acts as if it's watching a gladiator fight. No wonder I hate this show.
It's a no win situation to sit down with smug and arrogant liberals and not expect to walk out feeling like you have to take a shower.
Oh by the way… Since there will never be reductions in salaries for teachers, that 'Merit Pay' that Obama Speaks of is a code word for 'Teacher Raises'.
[...] Breitbart, the proprieter of Big Hollywood (UPDATE: They’ve got the video up there, too), Breitbart.com and one of my favorite conservative commentators, appeared on HBO’s Real [...]
I've come to view this and shows like it as a form of anti-discourse. They are even anti-social in a basic and important way.
I always applaud conservatives for going on these shows. Good job, Andrew!
Mr. Dyson is totally racist, and I don't think we'll ever be "post-racial" until we can agree that black against white racism is just as big a problem as the reverse in this country.
You know what is awesome? Getting into race debates with people, when you are mixed breed, or as I like to call myself, a "half-y". It really screws up their standard arguments, such as "not being capable of understanding" racism.
Why do Democrats complain about critics who employ guilt by association against Obama (Wright & Ayers) but employ the exact same tactic against Limbaugh (the chimp cartoon–which lampooned Pelosi vs Obama)? Additionally, Limbaugh is a Steelers fan, a team which has had a black quarternack & currently has a black head coach. There is a cross state rivalry between Pittsburgh & Philadelphia, so, of course he's going to criticize McNabb. Is Dyson trying to say that anybody who roots against a professional sports team that has an African American player is now a racist??!!
Kudos Breitbart for entering this incredibly one sided show.
Is anyone else as sick of the melodic urban inteligentsia rapping style of Mr. Dyson. People hear the patter of his speech and think he must be spinning the truth. And yeah, there's a code word in there somewhere.
Actually the scariest thing is the red armband wearing studio audience. God they're scary. It's the mocking laughter of Mob rule on shows like this and Daily show that frighten me about the future of our political system.
This Dyson guy is a pretentious blabbermouth. Never say in 10 words what you can say in 50. I wish that he and Bill (when not cracking dick jokes) would have given Andrew a fair amount of time to speak.
That audience must have been bussed directly over from a taping of “The Daily Show”. I’ve never seen so many dismissive, closed-minded, and reflexively liberal people in the same place.
The hate that the REV.Wright spewed, still is resonating with America. Americans were under the false impression that black people were trying to dampen down these hateful views. It was quite eye opening to hear Obama in his own words in his books, harbor these same views. This is the 21st Century. In a word, get over it.
Only for those who toe the line.
Dyson is a racist shout-downer. If you can't let your opposition talk that means you know you will lose the debate.
I like when Andrew said it isn't time to double down on stupid, and Maher basically said yes it was.
Also, was Bill serious when he talked about "wealthy old people" giving up their Social Security??? Either he doesn't know what SS is, or he thinks it is okay for the government to steal people's money.
Dyson is simply a wind up toy. He is allowed to spout his assertion that folks are talking in "code." Tell me, how does one refute that you are not speaking in code? How does one refute that the assertion that having a large number of black men in jail is somehow caused by my rascism.
The arguments he espoused are simply silly and yet, the audience is cheering him on. Wow, that was simply pathetic.
And yes, Clarence Thomas is allowed to be villified because he won't go along with the party line. This is an example of intellectual honesty? Man, this Dyson should be retired.
The good news is that Maher is slightly smarter than my 'weak' testicle. The bad news is that he's much smaller.
I only watched the first clip, don't need any more aggravation. The difference between inner city schools and suburban schools is parents, who will not accept crap teachers and crap schools.
I enjoyed the shock and confusion on Maher's sour-puss when Breitbart accurately nails him as a 'bully' (which of course BM, Dyson et ilk are)!
'Bully', 'cruel', 'intolerant', 'insensitive', etc. are toxic to the smug, closed-minded Leftists' "heads-I-win-tails-you-lose" totalitarianism.
Turnabout is fair-play.
So, hit 'em with it in everyday practice, their confused/defensive expressions are a joy to behold.
Ooh Rah!
Good job Andrew!
"Members of the cult of tolerance [e.g., Dyson] defend and justify their position with emotional, as opposed to rational, arguments." — Larrey Anderson, 3/14/09
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/the_myth_o...
Or crap from their kids. The most important part.
AMEN!
Great job Andrew! My sympathies for having to sit between two ignorant liberals who couldn't wait to call Rush and the rest of us who didn't vote for this obamanation racist. They're pathetic men who show their hatred at every turn!
Yep!
“When the law’s on your side, pound the law. When the truth’s on your side, pound the truth. When neither’s on your side, pound the table.”
Congratulation Andrew for doing what almost no one on the right seems to do… simply not agreeing with the premise of the questions being posed.
[...] Watch the rest at Big Hollywood [...]
Andrew, I salute you for trying to get a word in edgewise. What a loud mouth egotistical arrogant ass Dyson is! He managed to out do Maher which is saying a lot. And, calling Rush a racist? That comes form those who suck up the left media but don't listen to Rush.
In any case Andrew, I thank you,
Bruce F
The very first thing that come to my mind was exactly that!!! Wind him up, he will spew large terms, accuse everyone of using racist code words, and then try to pander to Maher. The audience cheers him on because he is saying just what they want to hear, and perhaps it could be, well, because most of them aren't very bright. I will give Andrew his due, I would have leapt over the table and strangled Maher. Of course, I have wanted to do that for years, so it may just be a long held view for me. I'm just thankful the clip went off before Sarah Silverman came on.
I second that AMEN! It doesn't have anything to do with Inner city versus Suburban. It doesn't have anything to do with how much money is spent per child. It has everything to do with the committment of parents and/or students to their own education. LIBRARIES ARE FREE!! If someone wants to learn there is nothing that can stop them learning.
This Dyson character tries to cloak the hollowness of his message with big words and fast talk, and the braindead Real Time audience just eats it up clapping not knowing what the hell he just said other than it 'sounded good'. And BREITBART, great move reminding Bill (and more especially his brainwashed audience) about Rush and crew coming to Maher's defense back in 2001. I liked to see Bill stumble a bit on that point.
First, please, pardon my english.
The only way to win those kind of debates – and using the word debate is so off in this case – is for you to be cooler than the others. Breitbart did ok, but couldn't really prove anything, because those debates are not about proving things, they are about making people fell good about themselves. So arguments don't really help. Liberals must bem laugh at, not reasoning with.
Great job, Andrew. I am surprised you could get a word in edgewise. Please the next time you have to defend Bush on fetal stem cell research, please stress that Bush did not ban research. He only banned federal funds for research. Private industry was free to research at will. and every rich Hollywood star including Nancy Reagan were free to give their private funds for the same.
Man Andrew and Ari Fleischer deserve some kind of award for standing up to these buffoons – as I am typing this Andrew is saying that Rush was no greater defender of Clarance Thomas – and the crowd laughs. And I notice every time Andrew is getting to a point one of these idiots interrupt. Andrew should interupt Dyson as Dyson interrupts Andrew, but Andrew has manners…
How do I create an account?
Andrew, your retort to the "rush is rascists" comment shoudl have been that you'd heard more racists and homophoboic comments come out of Maher's mouth in the last week than you've ever heard from RL. Did I hear correctly Maher used the term "homo" minutes before turning out the false outrage at Rush? Does not Maher have a recent joke that goes "Obama is putting the bowling alley in the WH to good use. His first game he bowled a 37, which should put to rest the comments that he's not black enough".
I would have confronted Maher on that right there in front of Dyson and demanded that either the entire world gets a pass to make those kinds of jokes, or Maher should clean up his own hate speech.
Reminds me of the dearly departed Tony Snow. He once squared off in that liberal hornet's den, the soul voice of reason, and left the audience in a hushed silence and utterly silenced Maher.
You are greatly missed, Tony!
I had some comment that wasnt publish. Somebody can help me?
Watching lefty pseudo intellectuals think they're debating is frightening. Andrew, I can't believe you legitimized this blind fraternity with your good reputation. What next, a debate at DailyKos with a Code Pink audience?
You have to pay membership fees. Give me your email and I'll tell you where to send the money.
Yes, I agree with you 100%. This is not about really debating, but about people feeling good about themselves for being in the side they think is the right one. I see as a big waste of time. Liberals as vicious, the moment you decide to debate with them, you put them in the same league as you: that's a mistake.
They have no idea how to debate. None of them do. Their whole line of what they call logic is based on irrationality and emotional hooha. Hence Dyson's mentally deranged behavior. He knows he won't win. He knows he isn't right. Its not about being right, its about winning. Aristotle would pound him for using p-poor debate tactics however this is the only way to win an arguement for them. You see it on college campus', on the floor of the US House. Just listen to that paragon of tolerance Charlie Rangel once. When you know you can't win and you know your audience has never had an inclination to educate itself you go for the last tactics a person would in a debate, appeals to pity, ad hominem, and arguing in a circle, begging the question. Leftists are all professionals at all of those lame, fallacious arguements.
cauchies@gmail.com
Just keep in mind that I live in Brazil, so your my money is worth half of yours
Schools? I must say I was pleased to see that wank Bill Maher say the teachers unions need to get destroyed. The left is starting to accept the conservative position on education, finally. After decades of shoveling more and more money into failing school systems, we are finally demanding accountability from the education industry.
Also, thanks for pointing out that stem cell research was banned under Clinton, and that Bush relaxed some of the restrictions. Liberals are wholly unaware of that fact.
No problem, I'll use my executive power as Big Hollywood's Director of Membership Services to give you a special price.
Ooooh! Liberals are "viscious!"
Grow up, Carlos. Or at least grow a pair.
I forgot to mention – something that never ceases to amaze me – Dyson's interrupting Andrew and saying "I'm articulate" It always seemed to me wiser letting the world decide whether you are "smart" or "articulate" or whatever the proclamation is –
But then I am reminded of the saying that "Conceit is God's gift to little people".
Are you referring to Mark Twain's admonition to never argue with a fool – it makes the public wonder who the fool is – or better words to that effect which I cannot remember at the moment…
Well, I would have loved to have seen what Christopher Hitchens did in that viper's den
I had to turn it off. Andrew was landing rights and lefts and uppercuts while Maher quipped (and ha ha ha, tee hee) and Dyson went off into la la land. I thought Farrahkhan was going to come down any minute in the MotherShip and start dividing everything by 9.
Andrew made a wonderful point–If people like Dyson are going to deconstruct/reconstruct every thought a person has then how in the hell is that person going to have a conversation with him? It'd be like one person talking about shopping at Victoria's Secret and the other what kind of pesticide to use on a rice field in sw China.
Maher & Dyson were total embarrassments.
Was there an argument there?
But I'm guessing that you are talking about the generalization. Well, of course, they will always be wrong and right at the same time. The ideia is that, on these kind of shows, liberals are not there to debate you, but to humiliate you. And that is viscious in my book.
Calling people racist. That's what Liberals mean by having a "conversation" on racism.
Yes. I always wonder how those shows would be without the audience to laught in each clue. I think they wouldn't be as much effective as they seem; that says something dosen't it?
Thanks. And I'll see that I can pay for that
He flipped them off. Many times.
Does that guy Dyson ever shut up? For Pete's sake Andrew – next time you are on ask if you can bring some duct tape so you can get a word in edgewise. Sheesh – that's why I don't watch shows like this. It's just too frustrating.
Greg Gutfeld does a great job on Redeye letting everyone have a say without anyone talking over them – it does get excited from time to time, and people do it accidentally but everyone gets a turn.
How can anyone watch this stuff without getting angry?
Getting lectured about listening and engaging people by someone who absolutely refuses to and out and out *says* he's not responding to *you* but to you in the general. GaH! I'd get violent.
If I were on the show, at the moment that University-Guy – sorry, don't recall his name -, said that some people live in a bubble I would only laugh and say that thanks to him now I can see the matrix
Yeah, and then label Andrew's comment as "anti-intellectual"
Unregulated science is just as bad as unregulated religion? WHAT????
>>Nobody's saying windmills are going to fuel cars. They're to power homes."
Such literalism from these "nuanced" libturds. Breitbart was joking. But you can't goof on a Liberal! That must not be allowed to stand!
Science should certainly not be unchecked – does Maher think that we should conduct any kind of scientific experiment with no regard to respect for human life or ethics?
I would love to see a tabulation of the "time of possession" within the discussion.
Oh s#!t, I shouldn't have read that with a mouth full of Coke! I had to drag out the Windex!
What I had a hard time understanding about that is what does the word unregulated means?
Like we should have some to regulate science? How would that work? Because, if science is the action of finding out what we don't know, how can we regulate something we don't know yet?
Religion has being the most regulated thing ever. People have being attacking it from tha inside (orthodox x catholics x protestants) and from the outside (militant atheists), since it has existed.
So, in short, I can't really understand what he meant with that.
I agree. I wanted to smack him. It reminded me of my sister-in-law's frequent resort to the cop-out, "I'd love to debate with you on this, but I won't engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent" whenever her right-minded older brother (my husband) called her on the carpet for spewing liberal garbage as though it were a a prophecy from on high. She couldn't hack a point-counterpoint argument, so she invariably resorted to insulting her opponent. For some reason, Dyson's "I'm articulate," jab reminded me of her pathological need to attack the intelligence or wit of her opponent rather than actually listen to the point he's trying to make. It was pathetic and it reflected badly on him.
And Maher's sophomoric pat on the back for Dyson's diarrhea of the mouth was pathetic–but not surprising. I don't think it had so much to do with the content of Dyson's little "I'm articulate" sermon as it did with the insult leveled at Andrew. You could see the smile on Dyson's face (though he looked down as though to hide it) when Maher praised him.
Hahahahaha…I have that efect on some people
"… does Maher think…" That's a rethorical question, right? ahahahah
Ditto, Bill and Brisco! It was the worst possible thing for him to say, IMO. I cannot imagine any of the very intelligent, well-educated black people I know ever uttering something so disgusting. Of course, they have class. And no "code words!" People who live in 3/4 of a mil or more house don't use code words about white people, why should they?
Wouldn't surprise me if he does. The end justifies the means after all.
As a black dude, I really want to go upside Eric Dyson's head right now. Everything's a coded word of white supremacy. BLAH!
This is what Liberals have to do to make it a fair fight; Andrew against another guest, the audience, and the host.
That was pathetic. All three videos was a sad show with Mr. Breitbart being shouted out of anything he was trying to say or interrupted by the turd host. The other man had more Uninterrupted time throughout with Mr. Breitbart barely saying a thing.
Of course he couldn't say much because the other man spoke in constant double speak, but I wish he'd at least shout him down for his gibberish as he was constantly being done himself. Rush is called a racists with the bobble-head nodding enthusiastically other guy and the mob claps ensue. Mr. Breitbart tried to defend to cries of the mob.
If only I had an ability to reach into the tv and slap both the host and the other guy whenever they steer into the stupid -which happened in all three vids- I'd have less headaches when watching this tripe.
Lastly, all thruout. Mr. Breitbart looked put off and had a scour appearance. He looked like he was stewing with those furrowed brows and I never saw him looking one way or the other.. just slouched in the chair and glaring straight forward for the most part. The other guy had canned gibberish that I have no doubt been used in other places while Mr. Breitbart stuttered a bit and agreed too damn often to the other guy and I had no doubt assumed to countinued but was rolled over by the rapid fire other guy with all his coded words.
Cheers to the lone dude who clapped to Mr. Breitbart once.
Liberals throw the title "racist" to anyone they want to shutdown. Labeling someone a racist, however, does not mean that a person's arguement is faulty. It is just a cowardly way to end a discussion.
Yes, and remember, Colin Powell was the archetype of evil according to the Democrats—that is, until he endorsed Obama.
That was a great line by Andrew
And it's not that black people can't be individuals with individual opinions but it's well known that… what did he say at the beginning?… that some black people can… I don't remember how he explained it… they can have the words of white racists and spout the ideas contrary to… I don't want to have to go back and watch the first section to figure it out.
In short… those black people who do not believe the right things are, indeed, non-black race traitors. (Heck, maybe it would be worth going back and transcribing it after all.)
And in the end "code words" is the code word for "I think this person is a racist because I don't like him."
I've almost convinced myself that Bill Maher is a rational actor in comparison, which is really saying something, but I know that the "code word" thing is absolutely where racial studies are at in Universities just now, and not some weird deviation by this Tyson fellow. Even in the absence of code words, racism is often defined by the professionals in the field by whether or not a person is a member of the oppressor race or the oppressed race. No idea if Tyson would defend that but I've sure heard it. In that case, denying racism only proves it. It's a accusation that absolutely can not be denied. There is no way to do so, not ever.
Hey Blast, this is a serious suggestion. What if you were to wear a hidden mini-video camera and recorder and get tape on the things you witness? this could actually alter the racial debate in this country. Sorta like when Geraldo made his career with the Willowbrook expose. Can you imagine the drive-by media, Sharpton, Spike Lee, Alton Maddox et. al. trying to explain away something like that? And imagine the kind of spot you put President Hopeychange on. I live in the 'burbs but used to own a "spy shop" in Queens. During the Dinkins years. Probably saw some of the same type things you allude to. Blast, I'm tellin' you, this could be big. Do what you gotta do.
Which Cracker Jack box has the secret decoder ring for all these code words. It seems to be a great way to argue any point when you lack any facts to back them up. Could we please print out what all the code words are so that Conservatives can argue their points with out using any of them. Then perhaps a real debate can take place and not one that stalls do to unknown cryptic meanings.
The introduction of Andrew was deplorable in relation to the Dyson introduction. Could that be one of those underlying meanings that Dyson was talking about. Maher has to point out to the audience who they should clap for and who they shouldn't.
Dyson's diatribe was irritating to listen to, to say the least. "Let me finish," how many times did he ask to be allowed to finish his long rant and Andrew cordially obliged. When Andrew, however, was trying to make a point it was perfectly acceptable to cut him off.
This Dyson guy is a pretentious blabbermouth. Never say in 10 words what you can say in 50. I wish that he and Bill (when not cracking dick jokes) would have given Andrew a fair amount of time to speak.
When your comment doesn't publish, scroll up or down and you may find a message that says "You're comment is too long" or that the comment is in "moderation". If it's too long, break it into multiple comments. I've heard that the site mgrs. are working on this. P.S. and go to "sign up for Intense Debate" to join……..for free
It was interesting to hear the reasoning behind the dislike of teachers unions. I'm only wondering why they didn't expand that into college professors as well. I find the attack on the schools unions and teachers half hearted. A majority of school teachers indoctrinate children into the lefts agenda.
When Andrew made the comment about college professors and all of their double talk I had to laugh as soon as Dyson proved to be the perfect example of what he was talking about.
My hat goes off to the two conservatives that were able to sneak into the audience.
I tell ya, we white devils need to get some new code words.
What is amazing is the left cannot even fathom victory in Iraq. I would have asked them what Iraq would have to look like in order to qualify as victory? Unfortunately we can't just enter in a cheat code into a Play Station control pad and just put us in God mode. The surge worked when they all said it wouldn't. I was against going into Iraq, but when AQ turned Iraq into ground zero in the war on terror I got behind the effort.
Old Andrew's not exactly Bill Buckley, Jr., is he?
"…for free…" Oh my God, someone was just laughing at me. Hahahhaha….I'm a dumbass
Yes, but they probably just put that guy into weirdoo zone. I don't belive someone went home thinking that maybe Bush isn't as bad as some people say.
ps: I have a photo now, FOR FREE!
I'm going to be hypocritical here for a minute because it get's thrown into arguments far to often but I think it relates, so here it is Hitler.
Wasn't science completely unregulated under the Nazi regime. We've heard the horror stories about some of the things done to humans in the name of science.
Many atheist look to science as their form of worship. Global warming would be the perfect example of this new scientific religion. People are coming up with science experiments that will drastically effect our planet. The main thing I learned in college is how little we actually know. Individuals trying to change our environment with no idea of all the unintended consequences is frightening to me.
Which is exactly why liberals say that increasing gun freedoms would increase gun crime… it seems right in their gut, even though all statistics and real world scenarios show otherwise.
What I took away from his black people can be spouting white is right racist jargon to mean, Uncle Toms.
Clarence Thomas, Bill Cosby, Michael Steele, Condoleezza Rice. They were in essence white individuals in their core that were being racist towards black people. It's not that they are free individuals with their own ability to think for themselves no it's that they are racist. Yet again the perfect example of trying to diminish ones beliefs or argument by inserting racist into the equation. Talk about code words.
Perhaps not but at least they got a dose of what they on the left have been doing on a regular basis. He fought fire with fire. It was great to see the reaction of Maher and the audience. Strange to think that they found it distasteful when they employee it regularly.
I'm leaning toward both.
Everyone today is correct and right. But, just like negative advertising works, these evil idiots like Dyson who make no sense and just spew hatred, make an impact. Okay, so they impact impacted little minds, but that is their base. Who are we to think all us conservatives are brilliant people? Surely we have some blasting lying loons ourselves who could sway by the same kind of Dysons blather, too.
Please, where are our Harold Ickes, snake face Carville,s Rahms, Lenny Davises (not the best but persistent as hell)? We take the high road and get creamed. We need attack dogs IN the party, not just Rush who is carrying our water and is using actual facts, which really slow us down. We are taking the high road to dishwater oblivian. The American public is so dumb (conservative,too) they actually like factless smackdowns. We have no swords to unsheath.
Colin Powell was never the archetype of evil. He did however knowingly lie to the United Nations about non-existent weapons of mass destruction, thus paving the way for W to invade Iraq. He squandered his credibility and he helped cause untold damage to the United States.
"Strange to think that they found it distasteful when they employee it regularly"
Yes, it's. But not so strange when you think that is all about feeling good. That is the big problem; things are not about truths anymore, only about feeling special. In the end, is the culture of celebs.
What they need is a host who controls the conversation and doesn't allow the combatants to talk over each other. But then… that's not good television.
Yes, it was hilarious watching Dyson make logically consisten arguments based on facts and philosophy. And how clever it was of Breitbart to respond that he was too stupid to understand what he was taught in college! Now that's a Republican!
You must be logged in to post a comment.