How to Talk to Terrorists
by Bosch FawstinThe US & the UK are prepared to open fire talks with the moderate terrorist wing of the Taliban. Here’s some advice from Pigman….
For more on my work, please visit my blog.
Email this to a friend | Print |
Share on Facebook
| Tweet this
| 
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
61 Comments
Here's what the Islamists and their liberal facilitators mean by "dialogue" – they threaten and accuse, the West apologizes.
mmm never too late for an old fashioned pounding.
Obama talking about problems? Look how well that worked in the Gates affair.
There's only one kind of Peace these Al-Qaeda and Taliban Killers truly understand and That's a Carthaginian Peace. Admittedly Brutally Harsh but need I remind you the World hasn't had much Trouble from Carthage in over 2000 years.
I'd invite the leaders of the pigs to a "conference", give 'em a Coke, then wipe 'em out with a .50 machine gun. Done. Next group of negotiators? "Please! Step right on in, we have a nice, icy cold Coke for you…"
I'd invite the leaders of these pigs to a "conference", give 'em a Coke, then wipe 'em out with a .50 machine gun. Done. Next group of negotiators? "Please! Step right on in, we have a nice, icy cold Coke for you…"
Remember this classic: http://hurricaneharry.blogspot.com/2006/08/how-to...
Radical Islam has governments from Eastern Europe to Spain completely, totally COWED. They don't DARE say anything remotely negative or insulting. Print a cartoon of Mohammed with a bomb for a turban? Terror in the streets of Denmark. Make a "disparaging" but TRUE film in the Netherlands? Theo Van Gogh STABBED TO DEATH in the streets of Amsterdam. Dare to contribute troops in Iraq? Bombs tear through commuter trains in Spain on 3/11/2004…there is NO NEGOTIATING WITH THESE RADICAL PIGS!
Personal question, Bosch. Is that a pic of you? If so, sheesh, you look a lot like Phil on the Amazing Race. "Not that there's anything wrong with that."
I won't lie. I laughed. This made me laugh. Am I a bad person?
war or no war, open fire or no open fire, the US and UK ALWAYS talk to terrorists. Yes, Bush did it too. As did Bush. As did Clinton. As did Reagan. As did Nixon. As did Carter. Get over yourself.
Forgive my ignorance, please.
How do you distinguish the 'moderate' from the 'radical' Taliban?
Are the moderates somehow less cruel than the radicals?
So kill/enslave the entire Afghani population? Who would buy them?? Where would we hold them while we waited for the auction?
Pffft, dialogue, schmialogue. Work 'em over with birthday cakes and Hawk missiles.
You ought to put in a hellfire missile with the caption – "Say hello to my little friend"
All you have to say to have a dialogue with a terrorist is "Do you feel lucky? Well, do you?" Of course, you have to have a .357 firmly in your grasp to get the full effect. And for a cherry on the conversational sundae you can add "Make my day."
[...] the original: How to Talk to Terrorists This entry is filed under America – Blogs, Big Hollywood. You can follow any responses to this [...]
You have a point unfortunately it's at the top of your head. Not a Whole population of any country just and I'll put it in big letters THE AL-QAEDA AND TALIBAN KILLERS.
A 45 ca. slug right between the eyes is a very persuasive argument! It tend's to make the others in the room pay attention, and as a bonus, very little "dialogue" is necessary when this technique is used! That's just me though! I'm a very compassionate person when it comes to dealing with terrorist…….
admittedly, your approach is much more humane and brings a quicker end to the arguments.
So I guess this means Barry's inviting them over to the White House for a beer and some baba ghanoush!?
mine is.. makes for great spear fishing in the river.
I was referring to again Al-Qaeda and the Taliban Killers. Thank you for wishing me a nice day and I return the same to you and I'm sure you have a nice head. Be Well.
Actually that's a .44 magnum. An S&W Model 29 to be exact. And the quote is, "Go ahead, make my day….."
Actually that's a .44 magnum. A S&W Model 29 to be exact. And the quote is, "Go ahead, make my day….."
Or just do nothing….
http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowl...
Jamesb those are great points, but you forgot that none of those places have "well armed" civilians! I don't care what our Coward President does or what he promises, the American people will still "Hate" Terrorists. Given the opportunity most law abiding civilized gun owning Americans would "plant a round" right in Ramsey El Kabooms forehead without batting an eye! Then again maybe it's just me…………
Primer, not only have you been labeled a terrorist by DHS, you are now an infidel for suggesting they drink alcohol.
Obama wants to coddle terrorists, I'd bet a vast majority of Americans don't agree with him. Just another issue where Obama is totally out of step with the voters.
I probably should abandon my dream of having a career as a Peace Negotiator then huh?
Finally! I was starting to think I'd never make onto that damn list………
well, things would certainly be peaceful when you were finished.
Fail.
True, but some of those Presidents enjoyed killing Terrorists more than talking to them. I'd prefer it if our current guy would adopt that type of policy. Death is a permanent solution to a Terrorist problem. No?
If the Taliban invaded America and tried to burn the tobacco plantations and destroy the breweries, you yankees would get rather upset.
Seems like these Taliban resistance fighters are doing an amazing job inflicting casualties on the American and British forces.
Despite the assymetric nature of the conflict, the Taliban may be on the verge of defeating the british troops. We will have to withdraw soon.
If Hussein Obama negotiates with terrorist can we call him a traitor then ?
Manly talk about all the means to incur warth on others is the hallmark of the true Patriotic Conservative.
When others do the dying, of course.
warth / Wrath (facepalm)
then again there was the incident at Alicia where Ceasar allowed Gaul to survive, denying Europe to the Asian hordes and civilizing it as well. Just cost Versengeterex his head… so Rome still has salent points to be made.
and, of course written by the great John Milius…
the idea of 'moderate' Taliban is pretty silly…
Ask any SF trooper returning from Afghanistan about so-called 'moderate' Taliban and they'll tell you that this is a ruse to gain both time and territory… the ISI (Paki intelligence) created this lot and needs them to make mischief with India in Kashmir and to buffer the Northern alliance.
Even Hillary knows this…
Unfortunately, "Law Enforcement" will support Obama if anyone tries to cross him and his policies. You WILL suck up to the ragheads, and you WILL like it.
BOOM!
*Sigh.*
This is a prime example of the Leftist tendency to tell people to shut up.
Allow me to explain: According to the Left, only a soldier or former soldier can speak in favor of a war, but anyone at all may speak against it. By calling the civilian war-supporter a chickenhawk, the Leftie (who is against the war in progress) hopes to either shame the civilian onto his side or shame the civilian into military service.
This leads to two dilemmas:
1) If the Leftie succeeds in shaming the civilian over to his side, the civilian is now speaking out against the war only because he doesn't want to go — in other words, he is doing so out of cowardice. This would make sense with a draft, but not with an all-volunteer military, as service is not mandatory. If there are enough of such people on the Leftie's side, groups opposed to the Leftie can point out that his anti-war movement is made up of a bunch of cowards, making the Leftie and his movement look like a bunch of jerks.
2) If the Leftie succeeds in shaming the civilian into military service, he just added to the troops fighting the war he opposes, thus making him complicit in the so-called "illegal war" by his recruiting activities. With each new recruit enlisted, he only digs himself deeper.
(more)
The trick to an effective chickenhawk argument is to favor the war while being military or former military.
What one must be careful of, however, is taking credit for the military's victories, i.e. saying that "we" won this or that war when we didn't fight at all. We are not at all the same as those who do fight, but just because we are not over there does not mean that we must stoop to the level of calling our soldiers all kinds of vile names. We must simply pay respect without making our role seem so grandiose and momentous.
Or, we can just end this whole discussion by only allowing soldiers to speak either for or against war.
Wait, I forgot a dilemma: If a soldier or former soldier tells the Leftie that the war is just, the Leftie, by the logic of his own chickenhawk argument, must accept it.
Hence, "chickenhawk" means "shut up."
Thanks Hank. My bad. How could I have messed that up?? Man, I'm losing it.
I've never fired a .44 but I did have a heck of a time with a .357. It would do the trick.
Hmmm, that conjures memories of the scene in Die Hard where Hans Gruber blows off Ellis' head with his P7M7. Crack open a can of Coke and then…POP!
Either one would make your day……
The best of them also know when it's time to stop talking and to start taking action. The latter is never a good thing, but if and when it comes, I pray God will give the commander-in-chief the wisdom to do what is necessary to see it through.
The best of them also know when it's time to stop talking and to start taking action. The latter is never a good thing, but if and when it comes, I pray God will give the commander-in-chief the wisdom to do what is necessary to see it through till the end.
I think negotiating with moderate Taliban is a hell of a good idea, and I think we should send our best, Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman, Harry Reid, Bawney Fwank, and last but not least our “Barry,” …problem solved!
The Romans enslaved 50,000 civilians when they sacked Carthage–that was their "Carthaginian" peace plan. They made no distinction between combatants and the general population, so they don't really make a proper example for Americans to emulate, IMHO.
And the top of my head is not pointy.
Have a nice day.
It's utterly pointless to try, but comparing the burning of tobacco (an addictive, potentially lethal but not debilitating drug) to opium (an utterly life-destroying substance) is a sign of delusion. Calling the Taliban "resistance fighters" is an insult to every Afghan man, woman and child. And saying we're losing is a bit of wishful thinking on your part.
NOW we're 'talking'
well done and reasoned…
The Left is so predictably tiresome in their repertoire'. The same attack is used on Gingrich and Cheney-
with little avail. Even though we have served, respecting the opinions of those who haven't is pretty easy, and there are some first rate conservative minds- not military- on this site whom we repsect highly.
Tell them to put their 'chickenhawk' comment where the sun don't shine…
ready, aim, fire!
I wanna be on the list!
Friggin' brilliant!
Fail. right back atcha.
Fail again. Go away troll and play D7D or warcraft or whatever it is that pusillanimous teenagers do these days.
It's actually pretty easy to do. Make an intelligent informed statement on a subject that makes complete sense to 99% of the population but goes completely against Liberal doctrine. Give the DHS time to read your emails and tap your phone, and bingo, before you know it your a "Right Wing Radical" with all the benefits that come with the title………..Enjoy………
You must be logged in to post a comment.