Sucker Punch Squad: ‘Thor’ Script Drops Hammer on Metrosexual Political Correctness
by AWR HawkinsEditor’s note: Script reviews of upcoming projects have been around for as long as there’s been an Internet. Therefore it’s no secret that a film can evolve into something quite different from its screenplay. Please keep in mind that this article represents a look at a particular script and not the final product. *some spoilers*
Thanks to political correctness, ours is a rough day for masculinity. Strong men are painted as tyrants, heroic men as ego-centrists, and moral standard bearers as bigots, or worse. This is particularly true in Hollywood, where a purposeful revisionism toward manhood has been under way for decades.
—–
Not surprisingly, big screen super heroes and mythic figures of valor – male figures – have been among the hardest hit by this revisionism. As a result, the mighty have learned to cry, the powerful to admit vulnerability, and the brave to second-guess themselves, all in an effort to win over the effeminized masses. And this is what makes the screenplay for the upcoming feature film, “THOR,” so wonderful: not because it carries on the ridiculous revisionism, but because it shatters it with a hammer blow from Thor himself.
Through its clear portrayal of an unapologetically strong male who comes to the rescue of female characters, risks his life in the defense of right and wrong, and loves his world (his realm) in an undying fashion, “THOR” promises to revitalize masculinity in 2011 the way “The Expendables” did in 2010.
Early in the screenplay we see Thor as a young man, and a citizen of the realm of Asgard, about to be crowned king of that realm by his father, Odin, who had been King of Asgard for some time. In that moment of passage, Odin’s words to Thor set the tone for the rest of the film — a speech about how responsibility, duty, and honor” are central to the charge Odin gives Thor, and as the screenplay unfolds, they are central to all that Thor does.
Yes, there are moments when a young Thor demonstrates the brashness of youth and launches attacks against other realms (particularly Jotunheim) that threaten the peace of which his father spoke. (Yet even in attacking another realm Thor never seeks his own glory but the defense of his people.) Nevertheless, Thor’s father banishes him to earth for having “betrayed the throne” via his brash attack on Jotunheim, and in casting him to earth strips Thor of both his immortality and the powers that attended that immortality.
Once banished, Thor’s mortality is represented by the fact that he and his famous hammer are separated. From there the rest of the screenplay is ultimately the outworking of Thor doing what he must to recover his hammer, and thereby his powers. The catch is that the hammer can only be lifted by “one who is worthy.”
While on earth, Thor is befriended by a group of scientists, among which is Jane Foster: a female who never becomes a romantic love interest yet who loves Thor nonetheless (and by the end of the screenplay is loved by him in return). It is for Jane that Thor risks his mortal life more than once, and in risking himself learns what “responsibility, duty, [and] honor” really mean.
Moreover, through these risks Thor unknowingly proves himself worthy to lift the hammer once more.
As the screenplay approaches its final, climatic pages, Thor learns that his hammer had fallen to earth when he had fallen from Asgard. Thus he determines to retrieve it.
If the screenplay remains as it is, suffice it to say that Thor’s efforts to retrieve the hammer will provide movie goers with an excellent display of things like focused aggression, righteous indignation, and a proper use of one’s fists: for these things are all on display in Thor’s character, as he uses brute force, cunning, and unbending determination to break through a small army of men who are dedicated to keeping him from the hammer.
I will neither tell you that he reaches the hammer nor that he doesn’t: Nor will I provide the details of the many battles he wages along the way.
What I will tell you is that “THOR,” as presently scripted, promises to hit us the way “Rocky” hit us in 1976. In other words, it could be a movie that men who shun political correctness will enjoy for generations to come.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
122 Comments
What a relief. When I saw the teaser on the banner last night, I feared the worst.
It's going to be a hoot to see what Kenneth Branagh does with a superhero flick.
Now I'm hopeful; it's nice to see that some filmmakers are looking at who constitutes their audience and choose not to insult them—first Invasion:LA (?) and now Thor. We will see….
Purrrrr…… This little kitty is looking forward to this movie (if they do it right) Manly men, not ashamed to be men, and have morals. ;0) A woman's dream. Plus it has Anthony Hopkins in it, always a good sign in a movie, but who is the good looking guy playing Thor??? A newbie??
Chris Hemsworth, another Aussie actor, he was in the Star Trek and Red Dawn remakes.
After viewing the trailer and browsing the script, I did not get that same impression. It felt like it was yet another clueless superhero movie that the studio had to make if it was going to release the star-studded Avengers movie, which it announced years ago.
Thor will most likely bomb at the box office. We can sit here and project all these ideas about masculinity onto it, but I don't think there's a dearth of content emerging from Hollywood for people who are into superhero, action, violence, and hyper-masculinity.
This sounds very promising, I don't want to cheer on a 'metrosexual hero', in fact the term itself is an impossibility.
Will wait for the formal review before I spend my money though.
two words-Natalie Portman.
I ain't buying it
We see you trollin'.
You hatin'.
Mr Hawkins said:
Thanks to political correctness, ours is a rough day for masculinity. Strong men are painted as tyrants, heroic men as ego-centrists, and moral standard bearers as bigots, or worse. This is particularly true in Hollywood, where a purposeful revisionism toward manhood has been under way for decades.
—–
In a time when action movies in general and superhero movies (most of which feature strong men saving women) rake in hundreds of millions of dollars, the author's premise that 'finally a movie has come along where a strong guy saves a women' strikes me as bizarre.
Given that one can't turn around without tripping over half a dozen superhero movies, quite a few of them well done (I'm partial to the last two Batmans, the second X-men movie, The Incredibles, the first Darkman, the first two Blades, and anything DC animation has done the past decade or so) I can't say that Thor's campy looking trailer impressed me.
Thank goodness! I don't know if I'll go see it or not, as it's not really my thing, but at least they're off to a good start with the script. It's so hard to take these whiny, wimpy guys seriously as action stars.
I really wanted to see the movie when I saw the trailer, and hopefully it will be true to what you are outlining here. If so, it will be a huge, huge hit. If they emasculate him, not so much. Movies about men are at their best when they show what men are capable of, and it sounds like here we see the raw power of a man, combined with the struggle that all men face in how to contain that power and channel it to productive purposes rather than brash, vain ways. Here's hoping!
Let us hope so! It is so sad that the father figure in sitcoms is always portrayed as an ignoramus who is bumbling at best and always goofy and unable to do anything while his wife is always the head of the class and a rock star. I am so tired of that cliche'. The neighbor is always some brilliant black american and the husband or wife always has a gay friend who seems to be more like yoda or Gandhi. Never mind that homosexuals make up about 2% of the population of the world. If it's a show on TV. There are always hundreds of them and they are always right and so is the wife and neighbor. The husband is always wrong and bad and evil. It's really sad.
Great! They didn't make him drop his Aussie accent!
The critics are going to slam this movie, I'm going to see it, take that roger Ebert.
Wow! A major film production that actually looks worth paying for. Who'd a-thunk it? I bet it will beat the hell out of Captain un-America at the BO. Hope Springs Eternal.
I have been waiting for this movie for a while. Thank God that it sounds like they are doing right, now if they just don't screw up Captain America.
Interesting that an example of masculinity has to come from off-planet.
I noticed that too on TV sitcoms. The formula was pretty standard:
1) Dumb and average looking at best husband
2) Hot and brilliant wife
3) Husband gets into all kinds of self-inflicted trouble
4) Hot and brilliant wife rescues him from himself
LAME….
Verily I say, thou doth depresses my soul with thou nashing of thine teeth. Begone to thine X-Box, varlet!
Looks like the makers of this film saw the successful formula put forth by Jon Favreau and the mighty Robert Downey Jr. in the Ironman flicks.
I guess the people responsible for the new Captain America didn't get the memo….
And don't for get…
5) Smart ass, know it all kids who show up the stupid, bumbling father.
Yes! You just made my day.
I noticed that too, I thought it was for one of two reasons. As Thor is from another planet he would have a different accent so they left his Aussie one or he was unable to do an American accent without sounding stupid.
Thanks for the heads up. ;0) You Aussis rocks!!!!
Just wait, the new Conan is coming out and there is a reason it is rated "R" in a "PG-13" induced Hollywood. I for one hope to see the limp wristed genre that has been going on for years gets knocked the hell out this year.
Right, thanks for fixing it…
Really?? It's rated R??
Ok, now it's on my list.
Maybe they should stop making movies that glorify monarchy as an acceptable form of government. He was crowned king – then started a war, what a shock. If Asgard had a participative democracy, maybe that wouldn't have happened. It makes me crazy in Disney movies too – they always have kings and princes and princesses in them even though all the real countries who tried that were terrible places to live that flourished after getting rid of them.
It sounds fabulous; it seems that it is the kind of film I can take my 9-year old son to see. I can't wait!
No need for fixing, just adding to your list. Bloody kids on sitcoms annoy the hell out of me.
Consistent with most of the masculine actors in movies today coming from overseas.
Oh man… Thank goodness! When I saw Thor listed under the Sucker Punch Squad heading I was crestfallen for a moment.
Depends on the sitcom, but yes more often than not they are used to bludgeon the father. Predictable and annoying….
Purrrr….. ??????…….oh man……..now where'd my wife go?
If by 'hyper-masculinity' you mean 'not acting like a mincing, lisping, nelly queen'.
I've loved Thor ever since I was in the 6th grade and bought my first Marvel Comic. Glad to see they are doing this movie right. I can't wait to see it.
Married with Children was the last sitcom which was remotely true to life…
Question for comic book geeks:
As I recall from my youth, the origin of Thor was a man trapped in a cave after a cave-in, and he finds a stick for leverage to move a boulder. When he tries to move the boulder, he slips and the stick bangs against the floor of the cave and turns into the hammer of Thor. So this guy knows how to turn into Thor by banging the stick against the floor and he fights crime and evil-doers as Thor.
Please fill me in …
EXACTLY see AMERICA gets it!
Even that one had Al as a moron.
Al wasn't the brightest bulb in the socket, but he wasn't a moron so much as he was defeated by life. Certainly not a success story as a man, but at least they didn't portray the rest of his family as great at his expense. They were all losers. In a perverse way, Al was still the hero, for even though life kept giving him the shaft, he kept trying and kept on living up to his responsibilities as a man, no matter how miserable it made him
Your most welcome, though you are making me blush (with a little help from both Scotch and Sake).
How is Norse mythology off-planet?
Hawkins, men haven't "learned to" cry. Men are human beings, and human beings cry sometimes. It is the height of male self-loathing to tell men to internalize all their feelings (and die years before women do), just because you're not personally comfortable with men talking about how they feel. A man who sometimes shows vulnerability isn't a "metrosexual;" he's just a normal person.
The Conan teaser trailer is godawful, but I hear the script is decent. Giving me most pause is the fact that the producer is known for a lot of B-grade pictures, and the director is known for the Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Friday the 13th remakes.
The John Milius/Schwarzenegger film may not have been totally accurate to the original Howard stories (or their portrayal of Conan) but I've always felt it did capture their spirit pretty well. A tough one to follow.
You don't need to be a troll to dislike action movies or societally imposed gender norms. I'm kind of tired of seeing the helpless damsel in distress waiting patiently while hordes of men die trying to save her. I'm hoping men start having respect for themselves in my lifetime, and treating themselves as expendable ain't it.
Separate issue. I've been complaining for at least a decade at how men are portrayed as idiots, and how women in these shows and films seem to have a license to insult them and even to strike them physically. There are alternatives, though, between "hapless dumb dad" and "stereotypical male whose life is so worthless that he jumps in front of a speeding bus so a woman doesn't get mud splashed on her new shoes."
Asgard is separate from this world, don't they have Google in Canada yet?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asgard
The history of monarchy is somewhat different from your preconceptions. Try M. Stanton Evans's book The Theme Is Freedom for a scholarly yet quite readable take.
Wow. What a preposterous comment- obviously your left-wing teachers damaged your brain. "even though all the real countries who tried that were terrible places to live that flourished after getting rid of them." Cheeerist.
Wow, another movie from hollywood with characters with nads (and they ain't on Hillary). If this does well after B:LA does well, maybe we will get more of the same. Naw, they will probably replace masculinity with Misoginy as they are both the same to the Hollywood crowd.
Actually, like most gods we have no idea what the origin of Donar/Donner/Thor is. Interestingly, he seems to be of the same Indo-European root as Zeus and Deuz-Pitar = Jupiter, but is not the ruler of the Pantheon in the way the thunder- and oak-god is in most mythologies (Tacitus explicitly made the connection). Woden/Wotan/Odin actually matches up with Hermes/Mercury.
Unfortunately, except for some very sketchy statements in Tacitus' Germania we have no writings at all regarding Teutonic mythology prior to the 13th-century Elder Edda, which was already an antiquarian work compiled by Christian Northmen.
Self-doubt and character depth is *not* a symptom of metrosexuality or emasculation. If that were the case, Rooster Cogburn would be considered as much as a pantywaist as Peter Parker in Spider-Man 3. There is a striking difference between self-doubt and self-absorption.
That said, Thor strikes me primarily as a fun kids' movie that older folks can enjoy as well, and in that setting, characters with simplistic motivations are not necessarily a bad thing.
Yep. France flourished into that Reign of Terror and Napoleon; Russia flourished into Stalinist Communism; Spain flourished into Franco.
They are head strong. I once had an Australian Shepherd and let me tell you, that was one determined dog. But once she got the message, she was an excellent companion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeRDgAkK-zs
blah~ One writes of honor and so & so, but as one concludes from such. One knows of this movies' greatest flaw! I wager that only -at best- the time in the fantasy world will be under 10! minutes while the rest taking place on normal~ ordinary~ plain~ dusty Earth!
_
7~9% in fantasy land.
93~91% on Earth.
_
Blah! I write –
___________Blah!
Checker battle for the win!
Are you saying that Natalie Portman's presence suggests something negative?
hey, now! there is plenty of masculinity on X-Box.
two more words-The Professional. great movie with a bad-ass protagonist also featuring Natalie.
Thanks for your input, David Brin. I suppose you hate Lord of the Rings for the same reason.
Branagh is great at telling stories about strong male heroes, as anyone who has seen Henry V knows.
Rooster Cogburn had self doubt? i think he had absolutely zero self doubt, which was part of his charm. Even when he reflects on his ex-wife and kid, there's no weepy self-doubt and he just accepts things for the way they are.
Marvel's Thor was one of my favorite characters when I was a kid. But a whole movie of Thor without his hammer? I dont know. I may just wait for PPV. But I am glad to finally see some male heroes with a titanium spine.
Kristine, I certainly hope you believe women have an equal responsibility to behave heroically, and to have morals.
Heaven is a kingdom, not a democracy.
Societally imposed gender norms? Huh?!?
Hey, I usually keep my comments to myself and especially hate to be negative twoards anyone, but I think you need to get your head out of "I'm OK, You're OK" or whatever 1970's pop psychology rag you dug that winner out of and see the harm that ignoring 'gender norms' has done to boys, girls, men and women over the past 40 years.
That's where you show us whence you come, bmmg – "societally imposed gender norms" – tagline from a university syllabus.
We are *always* expendable when it comes to our wives and children and yes, damsels or anyone else in distress. At the same time, there are a lot of virtuous women who consider themselves expendable for the sake of their husbands and children.
Having respect for ourselves involves the possibility of self-sacrifice. It certainly does not involve behaving like the opposite sex, merging gender behavior and dissembling about cultural norms. The norms are inborn traits that can be informed by culture, but we are not blank slates.
I was gunning for Branagh to get Best Picture for "Henry V".
Put Natalie Portman in front of a good director and she's fine.
If you have to ask that question, you don't know Kristine very well. BTW, notice she's from NYC. I would gird your loins if I were you.
;-D
I see from this post that I was correct in assuming that you don't know our Kristine from NYC.
Again, I say, gird your loins.
LOL! Precisely!
Tex, that was Marvel's take on it–Thor was punished by Odin for his hubris by being sent to Earth in the body of a crippled doctor. No basis in Norse mythology, but fit into the prevailing "hero's got to have a meek secret identity" model. Later writers explored his mythological roots more (adding his nouveau Shakespearean speech). The Lee/Kirby "Tales of Asgard" stories that originally ran as backups to regular Thor book are wonderfully entertaining (and back in print).
As for LOTR, you've got Hobbits, as near as "the people" as you can get, risking their lives to save Middle Earth. Yes there is a would-be king and a wizard, but I think it shows that when we have to face adversity and evil, it is better that we all work together rather than squabbling amongst ourselves because someone has royal blood and someone doesn't.
It's attitudes like his that give us things like the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution – greed and envy. I think there's a reason why those are 2 of the 7 deadly sins.
One more thing – in writing that it has struck me that when one puts aside prejudices against religion and really delves into them, you realize how much TRUTH there is to what they teach. It doesn't seem so quaint when you see examples of sin on display and what those sins reap when left unchecked.
Sometimes showing vulnerability is a far cry from a lot of the crap they have shown us in Hollywood in movies and TV. It's not just the crying. I've seen soldiers cry at the loss of a brother in arms. Point is, these men cry, then they get back to work. They don't whine incessantly.
Pop psychology? You've gotten your entire worldview from that 1990s psychobabble known as MEN ARE FROM MARS, WOMEN ARE FROM VENUS. I, on the other hand, come from common sense and actual real-world experience.
deMandeville, I've never taken a class on gender or sociology or what-have-you. Again, this is common sense. Amazingly, when presented with hundreds of counterexamples that refute your ideas, you simply announce that the counterexamples must not be real. A man crying? He must just be doing that because a bunch of feminists told him to. A woman playing ice hockey? She must just be trying to be a man. Uh, not really.
Right after you gird yours.
Well, getting back to work is what everybody should be doing. It's not a "masculine" or "feminine" trait. Which is my overall point.
Well damn, I am happy to hear this!
the last movie i went to see at the theater was serinity (firefly) i might go to this it looks good
Hey, don't say I didn't warn you.
;-D
And I don't need mine girded – I can take anything. I'm a Jersey girl.
;-D
I don't think anyone is saying any different. Only that the way men are portrayed nowadays, they DON'T just get back to work. They whine a lot. And they are portrayed as dolts or sissy-las las.
Again, you can have a man who cries, has vulnerabilities, but he doesn't dwell on them.
And yes, even women shouldn't be whiny, but overall, we like to talk about feelings more than men do.
bmmg39, I certainly do, after all I am (a NYC version) of a Momma Grizzly. Approach my family with harmful intent ya better watch out. But I can also appreciate a strong man to stand aside of during the trials. ;0)
And I am still PO'd that "The Expendables" did not make it to the Oscars.
Dude shut up! Are you trying to get them to revise the script again? Unless the writers are closet conservatives, you just wrote the death warrant for a manly Thor!
Common sense is that boys and girls are different. Not only do we have daily experience to show us that (ask any parent whether their daughters and sons acted differently from birth) but scientific studies also back that up. Boys are different than girls. Ask a school teacher. They get to see both genders together day after day, they'll tell you there's a difference.
What is neither common sense nor scientific observation is the silly belief that because there are some traits that all humans share, and because there are traits that vary from person to person, then there is no significant difference between genders. Ignoring both mental, emotional and social differences between the sexes is pure sophistry.
Too late. Joe Johnston turns Captain America into Captain United Nations, a left-wing trash.
He hid the accent pretty well at the beginning of the Star Trek reboot (George Kirk)… Your first point is probably on mark – that since he is supposed to be extraterrestrial, they didn't want him to sound "neutral" and asked him not to hide his accent…
Looks like it might be an interesting movie, though I'll probably wait until it's out on disc before seeing it… Can't see spending the $12 it takes these days to gamble on an unknown quantity…
Obviously, you've never seen the data from experiments where boys who have never been exposed to "boy things" or boy gender specific toys are immediately drawn to toy cars and turn non-gun items into "guns". There are ingrained differences between the sexes, and it is not all "socially imposed" as you stated. And those who think otherwise are the ones responsible for the "pussification" of many of today's men.
And before you jump on me… I am a female too.
1) Viking mythology 2) Hot God 3) Anthony Hopkins 4) Manly men.
Folks, Tickleddragon is THERE.
Chris Hemsworth – Australian, thus, in MY rule book: this is a must-see film!
I smell a DC fanboy ,it doesnt matter what the movie is like its marvel when you boil it down and cj thus hates it.
Usually dont post, but really just how many action movies these days are of men crying, doing nothing, then crying more?? I get that we dont have as many crazy action movies with Arnold in Commando or Stallone in Rambo II, but those movies were great cuz they were stupid! (thinking of rambo hitting a chopper with a grenade bow n arrow)
I think Rocky did exactly what this author says "manly men" shouldnt do: Rocky begged Micky to take him back, only for Mick to berate in front of a whole gym and Rocky goes out tail between legs. Then Rock gets a shot and Micky comes to his house, hat in hand, to beg forgiveness.
Both men had doubts, fears, second-guessing, and all these 'effemenite' emotions that dont belong in men movies. I get that no one wants an action movie where the guy cries all the time (because there's a lot of those out now??), but stop acting like this campy trailer for a campy adaptation from a campy comic series is ushering a new age where men can be men.
I feel Nat was more annying than Jar Jar in the Star Wars Prelogy
I'd like for this review to be true, but I'll remain skeptical until the finished product comes out. It's hard to imagine a film with Idris Elba as a Norse god being anything but politically correct.
"societally imposed gender norms" WTF does that mean? How about normal as in not a panty waisted abnormal male or a flannel shirted butch abnormal female. Those two abberations are the "societally imposed gender norms", and they are freakish.
I am cautiously optimistic. Now, let's hope that Hollywood doesn't screw up Captain America.
You must be logged in to post a comment.