<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; Scott W. Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/sjohnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>When Elvis met Nixon</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/08/when-elvis-met-nixon/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/08/when-elvis-met-nixon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=11469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the anniversary of the birth of Elvis Presley, who was born on this date in 1935. Elvis died of a life of excess and drug abuse at an absurdly young age.  He had been a superstar for more than 20 years by the time he died, entombed in his own celebrity.
When Elvis, Scotty and Bill found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is the anniversary of the birth of Elvis Presley, who was born on this date in 1935. Elvis died of a life of excess and drug abuse at an absurdly young age.  He had been a superstar for more than 20 years by the time he died, entombed in his own celebrity.</p>
<p>When Elvis, Scotty and Bill found their way to the heart of American music with their recording of &#8220;That&#8217;s Alright, Mama&#8221; in 1954, they (and Sun Records owner/producer Sam Phillips) knew they had done something special. Elvis found the heart of America &#8212; the place where country, blues, and gospel meet &#8212; many times over in his music. Indeed, after his artistic decline in the &#8217;60s, he willed himself to a second period of creative genius and genuine accomplishment at the end of the &#8217;60s and early &#8217;70s. Am I wrong in thinking that listening closely to the music all by itself can make us love our country more?</p>
<p>With his superb two-volume biography of Elvis, Peter Guralnick has made himself the essential chronicler of Elvis&#8217;s story. Guralnick of course tells the true story of the day in December 1970 when Elvis met Nixon in the White House. The story of the visit provides insight into Elvis&#8217;s patriotism as well as comic relief in the denoument of Elvis&#8217;s life.</p>
<p><span id="more-11469"></span></p>
<p>Elvis admired law enforcement officers and collected the badges of police departments he visited. In Los Angeles on a secret getaway from tensions at home in Memphis, Elvis became inflamed with the desire to be deputized by the federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangersous Drugs (BNDD). He inveigled his friend Jerry Schilling to join him on a quick trip to Washington. Bodyguard Sonny West would fly in from Memphis to meet them. Elvis asked Schilling to take out some cash for the trip, which Elvis ended up giving away to soldiers returning from service in Vietnam.</p>
<p>California Senator George Murphy was coincidentally on the flight from Los Angeles to Washington and Elvis sought out Murphy back in tourist to enlist his assistance. On the flight Elvis wrote out a letter to President Nixon:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Mr. President </p>
<p>First I would like to introduce myself. I am Elvis Presley and admire you and Have Great Respect for your office. I talked to Vice President Agnew in Palm Springs a week ago and expressed my concern for our country. The Drug Culture, The Hippie Elements, the SDS, Black Panthers, etc do not consider me as their enemy or as they call it The Establishment. I call it America and I Love it. Sir I can and will be of any Service that I can to help the country out. I have no concerns or motives other than helping the country out. So I wish not to be given a title or an appointed position, I can and will do more good if I were made a Federal Agent at Large, and I will help out by doing it my way through my communications with people of all ages. First and Foremost I am an entertainer but all I need is the Federal credentials. I am on the Plane with Sen. George Murphy and We have been discussing the problems that our country is faced with. Sir I am Staying at the Washington hotel Room 505-506-507. I have 2 men who work with me by the name of Jerry Schilling and Sonny West. I am registered under the name of Jon Burrows. I will be here for as long as it takes to get the credentials of a Federal Agent. I have done in depth study of Drug Abuse and Communist Brainwashing Techniques and I am right in the middle of the whole thing, where I can and will do the most good. I am Glad to help just so long as it is kept very Private. You can have your staff or whomever call me anytime today tonight or Tomorrow. I was nominated the coming year one of America&#8217;s Ten Most outstanding young men. That will be in January 18 in my Home Town of Memphis Tenn. I am sending you the short autobiography about myself so you can better understand this approach. I would love to meet you just to say hello if you&#8217;re not too busy.</p>
<p>Respectfully,<br />
Elvis Presley</p></blockquote>
<p>Upon his arrival in Washington on the morning of December 21, Elvis dropped the letter off at the White House and went off to a meeting (arranged by Murphy) with the director of the BNDD to seek a badge. He instead met with BNDD deputy director John Finlator, who refused Elvis&#8217;s request for a badge. Back in the hotel room, however, Schilling received a call inviting Elvis to the White House for a meeting with the president.</p>
<p>Elvis&#8217;s letter had prompted internal deliberations over the wisdom of a presidential meeting. Dwight Chapin&#8217;s memo to Bob Haldeman summarizing Elvis&#8217;s request is a bit clueless. The second page of the memo has Chapin&#8217;s earnest advice and Haldeman&#8217;s somewhat more astute response. Chapin writes: &#8220;[I]f the President wants to meet some bright young people outside of the Government, Presley might be a perfect one to start with.&#8221; Haldeman responds: &#8220;You must be kidding.&#8221; The meeting was nevertheless promptly approved and arranged. Elvis, Schilling, and West met up with White House aide Bud Krogh for Elvis&#8217;s 12:30 meeting with the president in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>Bud Krogh&#8217;s memo summarizes the meeting:</p>
<blockquote><p>Presley indicated to the President in a very emotionial mamner that he was &#8220;on your side.&#8221; Presley kept repeating that he wanted to be helpful, that he wanted to restore some respect for the flag, which was being lost. He mentioned he was just a poor boy from Tennessee who had gotten a lot from his country, which in some way he wanted to repay.</p></blockquote>
<p>Elvis thought he could be helpful to Nixon &#8220;in his drug drive&#8221; and Nixon expressed &#8220;his concern that Presley retain his credibility.&#8221; It was at this point that Elvis made his pitch for the BNDD badge. Nixon told Krogh that he would like Elvis to receive a badge. Krogh wrote in a subsequent account of the meeting:</p>
<blockquote><p>Elvis was smiling triumphantly. &#8220;Thank you very much, sir. This means a lot to me.&#8221;&#8230;Elvis then moved up close to the President and, in a spontanous gesture, put his left arm around him and hugged him.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not done yet, Elvis asked the president if he would see his friends Schilling and West: &#8220;It would mean a lot to them and to me.&#8221; Schilling and West were ushered into the Oval Office. Nixon gave them the same tie clasps and cuff links with presidential seals that he had already given Elvis.</p>
<p>Elvis prompted Nixon: &#8220;You know, they&#8217;ve got wives too.&#8221; According to Guralnick, Elvis and Nixon then rummaged through Nixon&#8217;s desk for suitable presents for the wives. </p>
<p class="media">After lunch in the White House mess and a tour of the White House, Elvis was presented with the BNDD badge by Finlator at Krogh&#8217;s office. Finlator also promised to send along additional credentials. &#8220;Leaving the White House,&#8221; Guralnick writes, &#8220;Sonny and Jerry never stopped to ponder the many strange things that had occurred on this day. As far as they were concerned, there was one thing, and one thing only, responsible for whatever had happened to them, good or bad: they were with Elvis Presley.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least this particular chapter of the Elvis story had a happy ending.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/08/when-elvis-met-nixon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Eternal Return of Hollywood Politics</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/06/the-eternal-return-of-hollywood-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/06/the-eternal-return-of-hollywood-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott W. Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recall an article in the New York Times entertainment section that heralded the forthcoming release of three overtly political films in what must have been the fall of 1979.  (My memory might be playing tricks on me.  I have searched in the Times&#8217;s archives in vain for the article; if you can track it down, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall an article in the New York Times entertainment section that heralded the forthcoming release of three overtly political films in what must have been the fall of 1979.  (My memory might be playing tricks on me.  I have searched in the Times&#8217;s archives in vain for the article; if you can track it down, please let me know.)  The author of the article noted the usual lack of success experienced by such overtly political films, but purred with excitement that the upcoming trio of films might change things.  In the event the three films proved successful, Hollywood might get serious about using the medium to educate the masses.</p>
<p><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/01/510y0xgx1al__sl500.jpg"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/01/cubalc1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8933" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/01/cubalc1-300x236.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="236" /></a></p>
<p>I say it must have been 1979 because, as I recall, one of the three films previewed in the article was Richard Lester&#8217;s &#8220;Cuba,&#8221; starring Sean Connery.  &#8220;Cuba&#8221; was a dud released in December 1979.  The enthusiastic Amazon entry by Marshall Fine at least honestly notes that it is &#8220;one of Sean Connery&#8217;s least-seen films.&#8221;  I went to see the film at the Grandview Theater in St. Paul because of the Times article, and I can testify that there is good reason for the film&#8217;s status as &#8220;one of Sean Connery&#8217;s least-seen films.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-8489"></span></p>
<p>The release of war-related films in the fall of 2007 brought the old Times article to mind.  The AFP story on the films called Hollywood a &#8221;casualty of war&#8221; in view of moviegoers&#8217; shunning of the Iraq-related films.  The article quoted one Lew Harris making a trenchant observation:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;These movies have to be entertaining,&#8221; Harris told AFP. &#8220;You can&#8217;t just take a movie and make it anti-war or anti-torture and expect to draw people in.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The AFP story also quoted Harris, as you might expect, blaming the victim (i.e., the audience for these films):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;People want war movies to have a slam-bang adventure feel to them &#8230; But Iraq is a difficult war to portray in a kind of rah-rah-rah, exciting way.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>One of the war movies that is deemed a commercial failure was &#8220;The Kingdom.&#8221;  Lewis&#8217;s explanation does not account for its failure.  It had plenty of slam-bang adventure; it was lacking in slam-bang intelligence.  The film was critically compromised by a hectoring muliticultural stupidity.</p>
<p>I hypothesize that the failure played out here is the general failure of leftist politics to fuel viewership of big commercial films.  Among the few items worth reading on 2007&#8217;s  crop of Hollywood anti-war movies was the pseudonymous David Kahane&#8217;s NRO column &#8221;What&#8217;s wrong with America?&#8221;  In the AFP story, Steven Bochco asserted that it is hard to engage audiences in entertainment based on &#8220;a hugely unpopular war.&#8221;  Mickey Kaus suggested that we needed a &#8221;thought-controlled experiment&#8221; to determine the cause for the failure of these films:</p>
<blockquote><p>Are Hollywood&#8217;s Iraq dramas bombing because a) people don&#8217;t want to hear about Iraq or b) people don&#8217;t want to hear about Iraq from Hollywood liberals? &#8230; Several hundred commenters at Breitbart.com (most, presumably, sent by Drudge) seems to think they know the answer. It&#8217;s not Steven Bochco&#8217;s. &#8230; If there were an Iraq film not made by Hollywood liberals, we might be able to settle the argument. &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I think if we stretch the horizon beyond the crop of 2007 anti-war films to include the Hollywood bombs of yesteryear such as &#8220;Cuba&#8221; &#8212; and thus see the films as part of the recurring manifestation of leftist politics fueling commercial failures &#8212; the need for a controlled experiment might be obviated.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sjohnson/2009/01/06/the-eternal-return-of-hollywood-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
