<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; James Hudnall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/jhudnall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NBC&#8217;s ObamaVision: Changing the Channel</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/18/nbcs-obamavision/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/18/nbcs-obamavision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBamaVision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=262210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If people think nature is their friend, then they sure don&#8217;t need an enemy.&#8221;
&#8211;Kurt Vonnegut 
NBC, which is last place in network ratings, has decided to double down on their green propaganda push this week by putting environmentalist messages in five of its shows: 30 Rock, Heroes, Community, The Office and The Biggest Loser. NBC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If people think nature is their friend, then they sure don&#8217;t need an enemy.&#8221;<br />
<strong>&#8211;Kurt Vonnegut </strong></p>
<p>NBC, which is last place in network ratings, has decided to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hgX5YPW310qCl8AmXhtXVpaJI15AD9BTBVS80">double down on their green propaganda push this week</a> by putting environmentalist messages in five of its shows: <em>30 Rock, Heroes, Community, The Office</em> and <em>The Biggest Loser</em>. NBC is owned by GE. GE has positioned itself to make loads of money if &#8220;green technology&#8221; becomes dominant, so they&#8217;ve not only invested a lot of capital in the Obama administration, they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN1224689020080313">trying to get everyone on their bandwagon.</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-264022 aligncenter" title="greed_universal" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/11/greed_universal.png" alt="greed_universal" width="240" height="180" /></p>
<p>It seems none of them remember  junior high and the way students reacted to all those <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5TJApnJ8X8">anti-drug scare films</a> because that sure worked out well. The people who didn&#8217;t approve of drugs weren&#8217;t going to do them anyway and the rest laughed at the videos they were shown. People in general don&#8217;t like scolds. They don&#8217;t like being preached to unless they asked for it. And certainly, when people tune in for entertainment, they do not want a lecture.<span id="more-262210"></span></p>
<p>They have seen advertising in all its forms and certainly propaganda. They either agree with it or they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough we get a sermon from many shows already, or that we&#8217;re lectured everywhere we turn. But the fact is, most of <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1444391672891013193#">what they&#8217;re trying to say is inaccurate or just plan wrong</a> in many cases. There is <a href="http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/index.php?showtopic=2050">no solid evidence that human beings are causing global warming.</a> More and more scientists are <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6553592/Climate-change-sceptic-Ian-Plimer-argues-CO2-is-not-causing-global-warming.html">speaking out against that theory</a> all the time. More people are feeling that <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/increased-number-think-global-warming-exaggerated.aspx">the whole thing has been exaggerated.</a></p>
<p>But of course, that&#8217;s not stopping NBC from lecturing us. I guess ratings aren&#8217;t an issue over there.</p>
<p>There was a time when <a href="http://www.tvparty.com/vaultcomcig.html">Hollywood used to fill TV shows with propaganda from their sponsors.</a> Now the spam comes from the Obama administration and their buddies at GE who want expensive windmills and solar cells to <a href="http://www.threesources.com/ncmo01.gif">replace cheaper energy sources we already use.</a> And to do that they want to pound on our heads until we scream uncle.</p>
<p>A better idea is to change the channel.</p>
<p>As for that Kurt Vonnegut quote above, it should be stated over and over again that the reason we have technology is to protect us from the environment, not to destroy it. All those green scolds should give back their inoculations, dental work and factory-made clothes and go live in some country like the Congo with no electricity and/or indoor plumbing. After they&#8217;ve really &#8220;gone green&#8221; for awhile they can talk about it. But never try to force it on the rest of us. We&#8217;re not interested.</p>
<p>Climate change is a part of nature, and it&#8217;s a good thing we have the means to survive it when it comes. What they want is for us to disarm ourselves.</p>
<p>No thanks.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/18/nbcs-obamavision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Comics and Other Publishing</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/14/the-future-of-comics-and-other-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/14/the-future-of-comics-and-other-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Direct Market"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diamond Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Levitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Brothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=256542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can probably date yourself by remembering how much comic books cost when you were a kid. Was it a dime, a quarter, a dollar? Can you believe they cost $4 now?
As the greenies would say, that&#8217;s unsustainable. Comic books used to be common. If you went in any kids house in the 50s or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can probably date yourself by remembering how much comic books cost when you were a kid. Was it a dime, a quarter, a dollar? Can you believe they cost $4 now?</p>
<p>As the greenies would say, that&#8217;s unsustainable. Comic books used to be common. If you went in any kids house in the 50s or early 60s you would probably find some. Not so much anymore. Comics once sold everywhere magazines were sold. You could buy them in drug stores, supermarkets, seven-elevens, newsstands, even some liquor stores. But the so called &#8220;newsstand market&#8221; was a hostile place to comics publishers, and a shrinking one.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="kid-reading-comic" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/11/kid-reading-comic.jpg" alt="kid-reading-comic" width="421" height="274" /></p>
<p>These days, it&#8217;s hard to find comics anywhere outside of the comic book store. That means that comics have become a &#8220;destination product.&#8221; It&#8217;s something you need to know where it&#8217;s sold, you have to physically go there and if you&#8217;re lucky, they might have what you&#8217;re looking for. However, most comics retailers order to sell out. So the odds are, you may be unlucky if you don&#8217;t come on &#8220;comics day,&#8221; the day the books come in from the distributor.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s another problem with comics these days. There is only one distributor. When I got in the business in the mid 80s, there were around ten distributors. But over the years they all went under leaving Diamond Comics as the sole place publishers can distribute through to the &#8220;Direct Market,&#8221; as we call it. It&#8217;s like government run health care, if there&#8217;s only one place to go for your needs, you have to like their terms. <span id="more-256542"></span></p>
<p>To complicate matters, the stresses of running a comics distributor in this economy has hurt the last remaining company. They have had their share of layoffs and warehouse closings. If that wasn&#8217;t scary enough for comics pros, Marvel just got bought by Disney, DC just reorganized under Warner Brothers, and long time publisher Paul Levitz was moved out. There is now a Hollywood person running DC. The future of the direct market may be uncertain at this point.</p>
<p>Marvel and DC are what we call the &#8220;Big Two.&#8221; They are the <a href="http://enterthestory.com/comic_sales.html">largest and oldest publishers</a> in the business. They drive the industry. If they decided to pull out of the direct market for some reason, they would effectively be turning out the lights on the rest of the publishers. There are many other comics publishers, but they can&#8217;t live on the book store market alone.</p>
<p>This situation is reminiscent of the industry in the late 70s. Newsstand distribution for comics was dying off and Marvel and DC were on the ropes. DC was looking to go to reprint material. No new stories. But a couple things happened that saved comics at that point, the birth of the &#8220;direct market&#8221; and the success of &#8220;Superman: The Movie,&#8221; and a few years later, the movie &#8220;Batman.&#8221; These re-energized the business in a big way which lead to a new boom in the early 90s.</p>
<p>Besides distribution, the other problem with comics now is the cost. You used to easily be able to sample new comics because they were so cheap. Now, if you can find them, they cost so much it&#8217;s hard for the average person to give a new book a try. That makes it extremely hard for new books to make it. And the industry needs to ideas. It can&#8217;t rely purely on old characters to keep going.</p>
<p>Enter the digital age. When music downloading became popular, fans started scanning comic book pages and uploading whole comics series online to torrent sites. In Japan, they started making comics (aka manga) available for download on your cell phone. And many comics started to run exclusively on the Internet. Marvel even started <a href="http://marvel.com/digitalcomics/">making their books available on the web by subscription to the service.</a></p>
<p>Print is dying, not just for newspapers and magazines. The cost of printing and paper, the problems with accounting for sales and waste in the newsstand business is what made it unviable for comics. Newspapers, magazines and books have been feeling the pinch for years. But the digital age is showing them a new path to future growth.</p>
<p>Digital book readers like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0015T963C/?tag=googhydr-20&amp;hvadid=3748255011&amp;ref=pd_sl_93qxhnzinw_e">Amazon&#8217;s Kindle</a> started to grow in popularity. <a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644523780&amp;N=4294954528&amp;XID=O:sony%20digital%20book:corp_reader09z_gglsrch:rplp">Sony&#8217;s Reader</a> looked to be a threat, but now <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/09/12/apple-tablet-eats-kindle/">Apple&#8217;s rumored tablet PC</a> may become the iPod for readable media.</p>
<p>Tablet PCs will be the future of the personal computer, being lighter than laptops, having touch screen interfaces, it will be like having a notepad you can take anywhere and work on. Except it will have Internet access, it&#8217;ll be a computer and you&#8217;ll be able to use it to read any book or comic. You can read in bed, on the beach, the toilet, everywhere you can take a book or magazine.</p>
<p>According to the Chicago Sun Times, major publishers may even be <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/technology/ihnatko/1835595,ihnatko-longbox-comics-apple-tablet-102009.article">working with a software company to bring comics to that medium.</a> And this can be a game changer.</p>
<p>Like iTunes was to music, electronic publishing on a tablet PC will be much more appealing than reading a comic on a computer monitor. With a tablet PC, you aren&#8217;t stuck to your desk or a heavy laptop. The tablet PCs will be as light as a book. Lighter even.</p>
<p>But even better, the two strikes against current comics will be removed. They will no longer be &#8220;destination products.&#8221; You will be able to get them anywhere, download them from the net right onto your tablet. And they will no longer be cost prohibitive. You might even see the return of the 25 cent comic. Imagine that.</p>
<p>Books, magazines and newspapers will more than likely follow suit.</p>
<p>And the tablet won&#8217;t be the only place you can get your comics. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/01/marvel-comics-partners-with-panelfly-to-bring-mobile-comics-to-the-iphone/">Marvel has just signed a deal with a company called Panelfly</a> to bring comics to the iPhone. Expect to see the software or a competitor migrate to Google&#8217;s Android, as that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source">open source</a> platform will become more ubiquitous than Apple&#8217;s.</p>
<p>So if the &#8220;big two&#8221; decide to bail on the direct market (which we all hope they don&#8217;t), there are still plenty of places comics can go to survive. If anything, the future of comics looks bright if they can escape the shackles of print media.</p>
<p>For traditionalists who like the old printed form, there will always be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_paperback_%28comics%29">collected trades.</a> Those are increasingly available in book stores which is the other place comics have migrated to.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/14/the-future-of-comics-and-other-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama Politicizes the Food Network</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/09/michelle-obama-politicizes-the-food-network/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/09/michelle-obama-politicizes-the-food-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=258646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a confession to make. I hate politics. That&#8217;s why I write about it, because I enjoy making fun of it. And one of the reasons I write for Big Hollywood is I am sick of other people&#8217;s politics being jammed down my throat through alleged &#8220;entertainment.&#8221;
So for many years I found escape on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a confession to make. I hate politics. That&#8217;s why I write about it, because I enjoy making fun of it. And one of the reasons I write for Big Hollywood is I am sick of other people&#8217;s politics being jammed down my throat through alleged &#8220;entertainment.&#8221;</p>
<p>So for many years I found escape on TV in the Food Network, because aside from the fact I like food and cooking, I loved that it was a politics-free zone. There was no angry Bush bashing, no digs at Cheney and Rumsfeld. No moral equivalency. No screaming about the 2000 election. It was all about the joy of food and cooking and how it brings people together.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-259638 aligncenter" title="michelle_obama_garden" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/11/michelle_obama_garden.jpg" alt="michelle_obama_garden" width="351" height="284" /></p>
<p>In a world so divided, it was a reminder that we can all get along if we can find some common ground.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the chefs and personalities on the network have their political views. The fact that so many of them are based in New York would suggest most lean Democrat. But the beauty of that network is never, ever does anyone let on where their politics lie. We don&#8217;t need to know who they voted for because that has nothing to do with food. It&#8217;s not relevant. And that made it a refreshing place to be.<span id="more-258646"></span></p>
<p>Notice I say &#8220;made.&#8221; Someone has sullied the garden and brought their politics in, and turned a popular show into an infomercial for one of her causes.</p>
<p>Michelle Obama, perhaps jealous of her husband&#8217;s constant face time on TV, has decided to start injecting herself in other people&#8217;s shows. First it was the <a href="http://www.etonline.com/news/2009/10/80249/"><em>Biggest Loser</em></a> which aired the night Dems got their teeth kicked in in some major races. (irony ahoy)</p>
<p>Now she&#8217;s about to appear on the <a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/">Food Network.</a> And not just any show, the most popular show. <a href="http://www.foodnetwork.com/iron-chef-america/index.html"><em>Iron Chef America</em>.</a> And not just appear, nope. I&#8217;ll let the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/dining/04iron.html">NY Times</a> explain it.</p>
<blockquote><p>In a collision of politics, cooking and popular culture, Michelle Obama will reveal the secret ingredient that the chefs must use in their televised cook-off: anything that grows in the White House garden (no further spoilers here, though). Mrs. Obama will also talk about her crusade to reduce childhood obesity through better school lunches, community gardens, farmers’ markets and exercise, which around the White House has the working title Healthy Kids Initiative.</p>
<p>The first lady’s cameo on “Iron Chef” is the latest example of her willingness to get her message across to the public in ways few of her predecessors would have considered.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, I can understand how she might want to be first ladylike and push her pet agenda, just as previous first ladies tackled such things as literacy and drug abuse. I also can&#8217;t blame the Food Network for wanting to have the First Lady on their show. It has to be good for ratings (or maybe it would have been six months ago, this airs in January. Oops!). The problem is, the Food Network is the last place I expected to see scolds talking about taking away snack from kids and making them broccoli. This is the place that celebrates pork fat, butter and sugar. It&#8217;s a haven from the Food Nazis who want us all to live on a diet of rice cakes and rain water.</p>
<p>The Obama Administration has been hostile to agriculture. From refusing to send water to <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/211381">California&#8217;s San Joaquin valley farmers</a> to bills that would <a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12671">limit your rights as a home gardener.</a> This while they are promoting &#8220;organic gardening.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Obamas love to stick their face everywhere, I&#8217;m sure the Cartoon Network and the Fishing Channel are next. The one place we probably won&#8217;t see them is the Military Channel. He&#8217;ll probably need more time to think about that.</p>
<p>Anyway, as a citizen I am lodging my protest. I don&#8217;t want the Food Network politicized. I don&#8217;t want the Obama administration starting to dictate diets to people there. What&#8217;s next, they put Paula Dean on a soy and rice milk diet? Enough!</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/09/michelle-obama-politicizes-the-food-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left Lashes Out at &#8216;V&#8217;, Obama-Friendly ABC Purges Showrunner&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/left-lashes-out-at-v-obama-friendly-abc-purges-showrunner/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/left-lashes-out-at-v-obama-friendly-abc-purges-showrunner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Chait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Peters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showrunner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=257910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night a brave and insightful documentary was aired that accurately portrayed the wave of ObamaMania that swept the nation. It was called &#8220;V&#8221; and aired on ABC to mostly rave reviews and tremendous ratings.
There was another documentary about the Obama campaign on HBO, but that left out a lot of relevant facts, so spaceships [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night a brave and insightful documentary was aired that accurately portrayed the wave of ObamaMania that swept the nation. It was called &#8220;V&#8221; and aired on ABC to mostly rave reviews and <a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/11/v-debuts-with-massive-rat.php">tremendous ratings.</a></p>
<p>There was <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/hbo-obama-doc-the-bland-leading-the-blind/">another documentary about the Obama campaign on HBO</a>, but that left out a lot of relevant facts, so spaceships and lizard-people aside, ABC wins the veracity award.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="v_the_series-29" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/11/v_the_series-29.jpg" alt="v_the_series-29" width="416" height="262" /></p>
<p>The parable is, an attractive group of aliens show up, out of the blue, and offer universal health care, advanced technology and world peace in exchange for our trust and devotion. All we have to do is believe everything they say without question. Which means, don&#8217;t ask anything about their hidden motives or past associations because that would be <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">racist</span> impolite. In fact, one reporter who is offered an exclusive interview with their leader is admonished not to say anything negative or they would be denied access (Hi, Fox!).</p>
<p>And what do you know, the aliens are really here to eat us. And maybe even take over our car companies and banks. That part is unclear. But I&#8217;m sure they will reduce unemployment, because there will be less people looking for work. Oops, I guess &#8220;V&#8221; has nothing to do with Obama, because he sure isn&#8217;t doing well on that front. But anyhoo&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/v-tea-party-tv-0">The New Republic&#8217;s Jonathan Chait was outraged</a> by the pilot. Outraged, I say!<span id="more-257910"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>This is not just a right-wing worldview but the worldview of the paranoid Tea Party movement. I’m really not sure how this made it onto network television. Maybe the calculation is that Glenn Beck will start urging his viewers to watch and a ratings bonanza will ensue. (I don’t expect scientists will be the scapegoats in the new series, as the original “V” alien campaign to tar scientists as a fifth column sits uncomfortably close to the current right-wing view that the world’s leading scientific organizations are conspiring to suppress evidence that global warming is a hoax.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, it&#8217;s Glenn Beck&#8217;s fault. He&#8217;s the new W, don&#8217;t you know. <a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/11/ouch.php">The New York Times critic said &#8220;V&#8221; was unrealistic</a> because no one would trust attractive strangers with a hidden past and motives, who told them what they wanted to hear in such a short amount of time. Yeah, right. Like that would happen.</p>
<p>Naturally, when a show debuts to huge ratings and mostly great reviews, the producer&#8217;s career is golden. Not this time. Apparently the network who gave <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/16/abc-news-teams-obama-white-house-present-presidents-health-care-plan/">Obama an infomercial</a> and <a href="http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=3885">refuses to release the &#8220;Path to 9/11&#8243; DVD</a> decided to <a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/11/big-v-shakeup-former-chuc.php">replace the show runner Scott Peters before the pilot even aired.</a> In fact, ABC hosted a big visit by press people last Monday, but Peters was notably absent. Exec producer Steve Pearlman spoke with the reporters.</p>
<p>Peters has been demoted to exec producer, a largely honorary title and has been <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010788.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">replaced by former &#8220;The Shield&#8221; and &#8220;Chuck&#8221; alum Scott Rosenbaum.</a></p>
<p>Was this a case of ABC purging a political dissident from the show to make it more politically subservient? ABC has been very pro-Obama. And while the president&#8217;s name is never mentioned once in the show, there&#8217;s little doubt what they&#8217;re getting at. Critics of the &#8220;V&#8221; aliens are shown to be viewed as wackos and fringe people, the same way the MSM likes to portray ordinary Americans who don&#8217;t drink the kOOl-aid. Journalists who question the motives of the V are treated like they&#8217;re &#8220;not real news&#8221;. Wink!</p>
<p>The show has been very entertaining so far. It tries to get a lot in the first episode so things move very fast. I guess that&#8217;s why the NY Times guy found it so unbelievable. After all, lefties were questioning if <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1584736,00.html">Obama was black enough in 2007</a> before they became full on acOlytes a year later.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll have to see if Rosenbaum&#8217;s episodes will feature positive portrayals of the &#8220;V&#8217;s&#8221; &#8220;death panels&#8221; and their reduction of the human population as lowering our carbon footprint and &#8220;saving the planet.&#8221;</p>
<p>One thing&#8217;s certain, I doubt the &#8220;V&#8221; would find too many people in this administration very appetizing.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/left-lashes-out-at-v-obama-friendly-abc-purges-showrunner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HBO Obama Doc: The Bland Leading the Blind</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/hbo-obama-doc-the-bland-leading-the-blind/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/hbo-obama-doc-the-bland-leading-the-blind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By the People: The Election of Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Norton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=257658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night HBO debuted the documentary &#8220;By the People: The Election of Barack Obama,&#8221; which chronicles the historic election of our 44th president. The film was shot by Alicia Sams and Amy Rice with a key assist from actor Edward Norton. The directors wanted to follow Obama around on his campaign after seeing his speech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night HBO debuted the documentary &#8220;<a href="http://www.hbo.com/docs/programs/bythepeople/">By the People: The Election of Barack Obama</a>,&#8221; which chronicles the historic election of our 44th president. The film was shot by Alicia Sams and Amy Rice with a key assist from actor Edward Norton. The directors wanted to follow Obama around on his campaign after seeing his speech in the 2004 Democrat Convention. They couldn&#8217;t get any calls back until Ed Norton stepped in to help. Norton doesn&#8217;t appear in the film. But there are plenty of other starry-eyed voters lined up to praise &#8220;the one.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-257778 aligncenter" title="400_enorton_81496339_bobama_080828" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/11/400_enorton_81496339_bobama_080828.jpg" alt="400_enorton_81496339_bobama_080828" width="377" height="237" /></p>
<p>The film&#8217;s first 45 minutes deals with the Iowa Caucus where Obama&#8217;s campaign begins. He spends eight months meeting people and working his bland charm, trying to convince everyone he&#8217;s just like them. An agreeable, prosaic kind of guy who looks good in a suit and grins a lot. There is no indication of his politics or past associations being radical. He seems a moderate. There are a few people interviewed who question his past, but it&#8217;s given little attention. <span id="more-257658"></span></p>
<p>Obama coasts through his campaign like some kind of prom king who&#8217;s used to people throwing rose petals at his feet. Michelle is shown as being the supportive wife and the kids are along for the ride. It&#8217;s an image of the family that goes along with the narrative they created for themselves. The film makers said in interviews that they were impressed by how zen-like the Obama team seemed to be. My impression was they never seemed that emotionally engaged. Obama often smiled, but he was generally very detached, almost like he was coasting to victory on a wave of hubris. Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod were shown as two tired-looking, almost bored middle aged guys wrangling Obama&#8217;s scruffy young ideologues as they tried to get more voters on their side.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;genius&#8221; as a politician is to be a blank slate for people who didn&#8217;t know him. They projected their own aspirations and expectations on his candidacy. He appeared at a time when people were afraid the economy was tanking and they didn&#8217;t see answers in the usual faces running for president. They were able to see Obama as someone calm and in control. An image he was able to maintain throughout the race.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how looks are often deceiving?</p>
<p>The film&#8217;s villain wasn&#8217;t so much John McCain but Hillary Clinton, who gave Obama his biggest fight. Yes, the revealing thing about this doc was how Obama seemed to be largely unaffected by the ups and downs of the race. Part of that comes from the fact that Obama was &#8220;selected and not elected.&#8221; He won caucuses, Hillary won elections. Obama was able to get enough delegates by caucuses to appear the leader in the race. Then momentum carried him home.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s career has been full of opportunities and awards handed to him on a platter. And when that doesn&#8217;t work, he uses underhanded tricks.</p>
<p>The film is a lot like Obama himself: bland, humorless and full of meaningless platitudes. But it looks nice.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the problem with ObamaMania. The Dems threw Hillary Clinton under the bus because many of them didn&#8217;t like her baggage, yet these same people, who screamed bloody murder about President Bush&#8217;s missing National Guard records, didn&#8217;t even blink at the fact that Obama has locked away so many things in his past and denied his associations with America-hating radicals. Yet his cabinet is full of those very same kind of people. Which brings us to the two most hilarious statements Obama made in the campaign, which were repeated in the film:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;People are tired of fear, distractions and diversions.&#8221; and &#8220;They (the people) don&#8217;t deserve four more years of failed economic policies.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>No wonder his poll numbers are dropping. He&#8217;s right!</p>
<p>The irony of this show was that it debuted on the night Obama was given a glimpse of his political future. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_election_rdp">Major losses were handed to the Dems</a>. And over on ABC, a remake of the &#8217;80s sci fi show &#8220;V&#8221; was aired, only this time it was <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/03/chicago-tribune-abcs-v-takes-aim-at-obamamania/">a comment on ObamaMania.</a> Attractive aliens come to earth and promise &#8220;universal health care&#8221; and hope and change in return for our trust and devotion. Little do the foolish earth people know, the aliens are here to destroy us.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you hate it when that happens?</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/11/04/hbo-obama-doc-the-bland-leading-the-blind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comics In Servitude to Obama</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/23/comics-in-servitude-to-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/23/comics-in-servitude-to-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Obama Nation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batton Lash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Strips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=251342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Last Week the Entertainment Industry Foundation (EIF) posted a press release informing the world that &#8216;from October 19-25, more than 60 network TV shows [will] spotlight the power and personal benefits of service,&#8217;&#8221; so wrote John Nolte last week. The EIF later denied Obama had anything to do with this even though the Administration has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last Week the Entertainment Industry Foundation (EIF) posted a press release informing the world that &#8216;from October 19-25, more than 60 network TV shows [will] spotlight the power and personal benefits of service,&#8217;&#8221; <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/10/15/leaked-memo-reveals-the-white-house-has-control-of-your-television-set/">so wrote John Nolte last week.</a> The EIF later denied Obama had anything to do with this even though the Administration has been pushing service as one of their agendas, even enlisting Michelle Obama as a spokesperson.</p>
<p>At the end of these shows there are links to websites promoting the administration and many of them happen to be <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/sright/2009/10/15/part-ii-search-and-ye-shall-find-left-wing-advocacy/">left wing</a>. Big surprise.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-251702   aligncenter" title="3434688599_33cd6a5c9e" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/10/3434688599_33cd6a5c9e1.jpg" alt="3434688599_33cd6a5c9e" width="320" height="290" /></p>
<p>Only a day after the service pitch, comics strips such as <a href="http://comics.com/luann/?Page=1">Luann</a> and <a href="http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/wpwg.php?id=94&amp;today=2009-10-22">Pickles</a> did little strips promoting service with a mild joke.</p>
<p>Well, I think I should do my patriotic duty, too. Why not? I want to do a service for the people on the Internets. So I&#8217;m going to do a strip of my own to talk about the Obama Administration. I&#8217;m calling it <strong>Obama Nation</strong>. And I&#8217;m doing it with Batton Lash who does the great strip <a href="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/supernaturallaw/slaw/series.php?view=archive&amp;chapter=2220&amp;mpe=1&amp;step=1">Supernatural Law.</a><span id="more-251342"></span></p>
<p>Look for it to debut this Sunday on Big Hollywood.</p>
<p>If you read my article about <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/14/the-new-counter-culture-liberty/">the New Counter Culture</a> you&#8217;ll know that I feel very strongly about using the arts to tell the truth as we see it about the people in power. After all, it&#8217;s the duty of every creative person to hold those in power accountable in some way, even if you think you agree with them. They still have power over everyone&#8217;s lives, yet the truth is they work for us. They are our employees. And we should not let the employees do whatever they want. They shouldn&#8217;t run up the business&#8217; phone bills and credit cards. They should not be spending their time surfing the web for porn and having wild parties at our expense. They shouldn&#8217;t be embezzling money and throwing trash on the floors and setting the place on fire.</p>
<p>Yet they are. And we&#8217;re letting them. Much of the creative community right now are giving the prez and his crew the thumbs up and even actively creating propaganda for him. So-called comedians are afraid to find anything about him to mock. They praise him and attack those no longer in power. How brave.</p>
<p>Well not me. I find plenty to mock. Plenty to sneer at. Plenty to let fly my sarcastic barbs at.</p>
<p>This is my service to you, dear readers. Look for Obama Nation on Sunday.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/23/comics-in-servitude-to-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alec Baldwin&#8217;s Race Card Game</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/20/alec-baldwins-race-card-game/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/20/alec-baldwins-race-card-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Sharpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alec baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white guilt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=249414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After enduring another self immolating Bill Maher monologue on &#8220;Real Time with Bill Maher,&#8221; Alec Baldwin was asked if Rush Limbaugh is a racist. To which Alec fell into that trap so many of his peers have in recent days:
&#8220;I think you need to always distinguish the rank and file of the Republican Party and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-249666 aligncenter" title="alec-baldwin" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/10/alec-baldwin.jpg" alt="alec-baldwin" width="431" height="280" /></p>
<p>After enduring another <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/10/19/the-bill-maher-meltdown/">self immolating Bill Maher monologue</a> on &#8220;Real Time with Bill Maher,&#8221; Alec Baldwin was asked if Rush Limbaugh is a racist. To which <a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/racism_in_gop_stars.html#">Alec fell into that trap so many of his peers have in recent days:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think you need to always distinguish the rank and file of the Republican Party and conservatives and voters from their media representation and media stars and I believe that the people who are in the media and prominent in the media in the conservative community, speaking on behalf of the Republican Party, have a very clear racist stripe through their commentary, consistently. Not just Limbaugh but all of those people. But I don&#8217;t think that their rank and file Republicans are like that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, at least he didn&#8217;t accuse all Republicans. I guess he wanted them to keep some of them watching his show.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s a sure fire way to look old and busted in today&#8217;s media world it&#8217;s to make the sweeping generalization that people who disagree with your politics are racist. It&#8217;s such a 20th Century argument. Calling someone a racist with no proof is hack. It&#8217;s like calling someone evil just because they don&#8217;t agree with you. Oh, wait&#8211;the race card hustlers do that too! They look for any evidence they can, no matter how vague or slight, to blow up into an incident. And if they can&#8217;t find one, well, they just make it up.<span id="more-249414"></span></p>
<p>None of the quotes attributed to Limbaugh were proven and in fact, <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/10/huffpo_retracts_false_limbaugh.asp">they were retracted by the people who made the accusation.</a></p>
<p>But Baldwin, ever late to the game, had to throw it out there again. Way to be current, Alec! Got any Spiro Agnew accusations while you&#8217;re at it?</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not pick on poor Alec, he&#8217;s not alone in his dated and lame arguments, We can add such youthful and hip (replacement candidates) as Jimmy Carter, Charlie Rangel, Maureen Dowd, Charlie Gibson, Bill Maher, Janeane Garofalo and Maxine Waters to the race card tournament. Just to name a few.</p>
<p>They want us to believe that anyone who disagrees with President Obama is a racist because he&#8217;s black. Hmm&#8230;that&#8217;s odd. Only two years ago <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1584736,00.html">the lefties didn&#8217;t think he was.</a> That&#8217;s the power of magical thinking. You can change people&#8217;s color or invent quotes from thin air just by wishing them to be.</p>
<p>But it still makes you look like fools for doing it.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the president wisely came out and said that the critics of his policies are <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090918/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama">mostly not attacking him because of his race.</a> He&#8217;s correct.</p>
<p>But <em>there is</em> a racist component here. And it&#8217;s actually coming from race card holders. They&#8217;re attacking Obama&#8217;s critics <em>because</em> of their race. They&#8217;re assuming that they&#8217;re all white. This is wrong for two reasons.</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Not all of them are white, so in their minds, any Black, Asian, Latinos in the mix must be &#8220;race traitors,&#8221; which is a racist term.</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s racist to assume white people&#8217;s motivations are always racist when it comes to people of color. A common claim from race card hustlers.</p></blockquote>
<p>If white people were so racist they never would have abolished slavery, in fact, it&#8217;s an insult to the many who fought and died to end slavery. Oh, and by the way, the Republican party was founded on an abolition platform. President Abe Lincoln was a Republican.</p>
<p>If whites were so racist, they wouldn&#8217;t have voted for civil rights. Oh, and by the way, civil rights laws wouldn&#8217;t have passed without the help of Republicans. Many Democrats voted against the bills.</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way, it was progressive President Woodrow Wilson who segregated our military in the early 20th Century. He was a Democrat. Don&#8217;t you hate it when that happens? So was President Johnson who enslaved a several generations to the welfare state, which among other things <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_black_family.html">devastated the black family.</a> Progressives, and their social engineering. It has fail written all over it.</p>
<p>Calling Republicans racist when their current leader is black is as lame as calling Limbaugh a racist based on fabricated quotes that were already retracted.</p>
<p>Racism used to be such a radioactive thing. But because the left has so overplayed their hand, and used the race card to the point of hilarity, they&#8217;ve almost rendered it inert. People used to be cowed by the racism charge. Now they&#8217;re fighting back. Soon they will laugh at it. They risk making it cool to be called racist, when it&#8217;s lame-os that like to throw the term around.</p>
<p>When the left loses one of its most potent weapons, it becomes a laughing stock. It becomes the target of backlash.</p>
<p>They are the establishment now. They can&#8217;t blame Republicans now. The Democrats are in charge. As such, they can no longer hide behind the skirts of the oppressed. They <em>are</em> the oppressors.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, white guilt is based on a lie. Yes, you heard that right.</p>
<p>No other Western nation would have voted for a black man before America did. America is the least racist nation on earth. Why else do people of every color want to flock here?</p>
<p>Those who keep bringing up slavery and other things from generations past conveniently ignore the fact that those conditions were everywhere. Not just America. In many instances, it was much worse than here. In fact, slavery still exists in many other nations. At least America worked hard to change and improve ourselves. We&#8217;re ahead of the world in that regard.</p>
<p>The next time some politician or celebrity throws out the race card, they&#8217;ve revealed their irrelevance. They are old and busted.</p>
<p>The new hotness is to make them regret ever using it.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/20/alec-baldwins-race-card-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to Recall Al Gore&#8217;s Oscar</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/16/recall-al-gores-oscar-stat/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/16/recall-al-gores-oscar-stat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not Evil Just Wrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phelim McAleer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=248130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Gore, Jr. has a history of trying to juke stats to get results he wants. In the 2000 election, he wanted the Florida recount to only look at ballots in three counties with large Democrat populations and he wanted to block military votes from soldiers overseas. The reason for this was simple. He wanted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore, Jr. has a history of trying to juke stats to get results he wants. In the 2000 election, he wanted the Florida recount to only look at ballots in three counties with large Democrat populations and he wanted to block military votes from soldiers overseas. The reason for this was simple. He wanted the results that would make him a winner, he did not want to risk that by including all the votes in the state, especially from conservative areas like the Panhandle.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-248390 aligncenter" title="al-gore-thumbs-up" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/10/al-gore-thumbs-up.jpg" alt="al-gore-thumbs-up" width="436" height="279" /></p>
<p>After a <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth">court in England decreed that there were 11 &#8220;inaccuracies&#8221; in &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221;</a>, many of which could be classified as outright lies and false claims, Gore did not recut the film. So when film director Phelim McAleer asked him if he would fix the problem, <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/annmcelhinney/2009/10/11/al-gore-the-death-of-journalism/">Gore refused to answer</a> and McAleer&#8217;s mic was cut.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising that Gore is being evasive. When a &#8220;peer reviewed&#8221; study of tree rings used in the UN&#8217;s IPCC reports referenced by people like Gore, was revisited by scientists, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/29/yamal_scandal/">guess what they discovered?</a><span id="more-248130"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>At least eight papers purporting to reconstruct the historical temperature record times may need to be revisited, with significant implications for contemporary climate studies, the basis of the IPCC&#8217;s assessments. A number of these involve senior climatologists at the British climate research centre CRU at the University East Anglia. In every case, peer review failed to pick up the errors.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, these peer reviewed scientists cherry picked the data to arrive at a conclusion they liked. Sound familiar? It gets worse, <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTBiMTRlMDQxNzEyMmRhZjU3ZmYzODI5MGY4ZWI5OWM">They mysteriously lost the climate studies they did over the years that were supposed to prove the climate was warming.</a> Oops!</p>
<p>British news sources that once told us Global Warming was real are <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1220052/Austria-sees-earliest-snow-history-America-sees-lowest-temperatures-50-years-So-did-global-warming-go.html?ITO=1490#">now changing their tune.</a> In fact, 2009 may become the year that <a href="http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3310/Losing-Their-Religion-2009-officially-declared-year-the-media-lost-their-faith-in-manmade-global-warming-fears">the Global Warming scam met its &#8220;tipping point.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>It should come as no surprise Gore was made a hero by people who like to believe in the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fantasy. After all, it&#8217;s immensely egotistical to think humans are going to change the climate when one major volcano eruption can easily eclipse all the industrial output of the 20th century combined. <a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~bubbmi/krakatoa.htm">It&#8217;s happened before</a> in modern times and we&#8217;re still here.</p>
<p>Considering that Gore based his film on fiction and lies, and has made no effort to correct his &#8220;mistakes,&#8221; he deserves neither a Documentary Oscar nor a Nobel Prize. Of course, the Nobel has been given to other <a href="http://www.upress.umn.edu/Books/A/arias_rigoberta.html">liars</a>, <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1994/arafat-bio.html">terrorists</a> and <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/index.html">frauds</a> so we can focus on the Oscar.</p>
<p>Ann McElhinney&#8217;s and Phelim McAleer&#8217;s film &#8220;<a href="http://www.noteviljustwrong.com/">Not Evil Just Wrong</a>&#8221; takes apart Gore&#8217;s crockumentary piece by piece. It&#8217;s part of a growing movement against the AGW movement as the earth gets colder, not warmer. Gore was not only wrong, he was scaring people. His motives are purely avaricious, not humane. Since the film debuted he has made millions and stands to make millions more from so called &#8220;green companies&#8221; he put in place <a href="http://www.powermag.com/environmental/Gore-knows-best_1351.html">to reap the windfall</a> from the hysteria.</p>
<p>For this and the fact that documentaries are supposed to be based in some kind of facts, Al Gore&#8217;s Oscar needs to be rescinded.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start a petition.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/16/recall-al-gores-oscar-stat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Counter Culture: Liberty</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/14/the-new-counter-culture-liberty/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/14/the-new-counter-culture-liberty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counter-culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hippie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Night Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=244866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time in America, the 1960s to be exact, a generation of young people dissatisfied with the status quo decided they wanted to change society for that they felt was the better. They resented the culture of the time, which was a conservative, somewhat conformist society born out of the 1950s. Taking a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time in America, the 1960s to be exact, a generation of young people dissatisfied with the status quo decided they wanted to change society for that they felt was the better. They resented the culture of the time, which was a conservative, somewhat conformist society born out of the 1950s. Taking a cue from the Soviets who called anything that was against Communism &#8220;counter-revolutionary&#8221; they referred their movement as the &#8220;counter-culture.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-245174 aligncenter" title="hippies1238824689" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/10/hippies1238824689.jpg" alt="hippies1238824689" width="228" height="280" /></p>
<p>From this we got the hippies, the yippies, underground comics, groups like the SLA and the Black Panthers, all sorts of pressure groups and social movements. These were mostly influenced and orchestrated by the left. In fact, leftists had a big hand in shaping a lot of those communities and they infiltrated academia, education, government, media. Over the years they effected a lot of change to our society.</p>
<p>You can judge for yourself how well that worked out. But you can&#8217;t deny they managed to get a lot of what they wanted. Except what resulted is a typical example of human irony.<span id="more-244866"></span></p>
<p>The counter-culture wanted to be free of what they considered a constricting, conformist society. Yet what did they turn it into when they got old and assumed power? They created a society more restrictive and conformist than that &#8220;evil&#8221; repressive 50s culture they love to vilify. They have become the new scolds. They have ushered in an &#8220;Age of Unreason&#8221; where you have to do what they say or else. They tell us what we can eat, what we can say, what kind of car to drive, what kind of light bulbs to use, on and on. They lecture us about our &#8220;carbon footprint&#8221; and &#8220;sustainable lifestyle&#8221;. They claim that the government, which they have spent the last eight years railing against, can solve all our problems if we abdicate what&#8217;s left of our personal freedoms, without question.</p>
<p>The &#8220;establishment&#8221; these days is left wing. Look around, from the administration to most of the entertainers on TV, the message is left leaning despite the fact that the country is more right leaning. &#8220;The Man&#8221; is a leftie tyrant. You don&#8217;t dare speak against the system or be scorned by the media and all the yapping chihuahuas of the echo chamber.</p>
<p>The comics of late night and cable are a perfect example of this. They&#8217;ve become nothing more than palace eunuchs, simpering at the thought of offending the hive mind. They do not serve the same function of comics past. Johnny Carson at least lobbed mild jokes at presidents, Democrat and Republican, all in good fun. Now, today&#8217;s comics don&#8217;t find this administration something to laugh at, even though it is one of the richest targets for sarcasm in recent memory. You have a pompous, egoist of a president with almost no accomplishments to show for all his hubris. It&#8217;s funny enough on its own. Then you throw in the collection of crazies from Nancy Pelosi to the wacky czars. It&#8217;s low hanging fruit to anyone with two brain cells to rub together. Can you count all their collective brain cells on one hand?</p>
<p>If the alleged comics of late night and cable have no imagination or guts, that&#8217;s where we come in. The new Counter Culture.</p>
<p>We, the artists who reject the politics of &#8220;the man,&#8221; the propaganda of the state. We artists, writers and creative people who are tired of being pushed around and told what to do. Those of us who think everything is going wrong and it&#8217;s got to stop. We are using our art, our work, to show the folly of the ways of the &#8220;establishment&#8221;. We&#8217;re finding plenty to mock and criticize. And we don&#8217;t need the approval of the &#8220;cool kids&#8221; who really aren&#8217;t. Not even remotely.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s <em>not</em> a conservative vs lefty argument. It&#8217;s freedom lovers verses the statists. It&#8217;s liberty vs tyranny.</p>
<p>The people have been sold out by those who never sought to give us freedom. They want to entrap the people in greater dependency on the state. They want to tax every person and business into the stone age. They want to regulate every aspect of people&#8217;s lives.</p>
<p>We say no. We reject that. &#8220;We&#8221; are those who are willing to speak out and ridicule the corrupt bureaucrats and their enablers, just as the counter-culturalists of the 60s mocked the &#8220;older generation,&#8221; we&#8217;re launching our own counter offensive to their propaganda. Our own critiques to their rhetoric.</p>
<p>The Age of Aquarius is over. We&#8217;re entering the Age of Libra. The age of Balance. No more tilting to the left!</p>
<p>Unlike the old guard entertainers who continue to shuck and jive for the state, we&#8217;re here to expose, reveal and satirize the endless tyranny being rammed down our throats. The real “change” is going to come from those us who have the guts to say NO.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re loud and we&#8217;re proud. We&#8217;re the new counter-culture!</p>
<p>Get ready, We&#8217;re coming.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/14/the-new-counter-culture-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>165</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If School Kids Sang the Truth About Obama</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/08/if-school-kids-sang-the-truth-about-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/08/if-school-kids-sang-the-truth-about-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Hudnall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Battle Hymn of the Republic"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Jesus Loves Me"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cash for Clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=239126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We recently found out that a bunch of kids in New Jersey and yesterday on CNN were told to sing songs praising President Barack Hussein Obama. This particular song caused a lot of outcry, probably because it swiped bits from &#8220;Jesus Loves Me&#8221; and &#8220;Battle Hymn of the Republic&#8221; while trying to mold them into little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-243730 aligncenter" title="obama_contempt" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2009/10/obama_contempt.jpg" alt="obama_contempt" width="385" height="231" /></p>
<p>We recently found out that a bunch of kids in New Jersey and yesterday on CNN were told to sing songs praising President Barack Hussein Obama. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re0q0lGOGRE">This particular song caused a lot of outcry</a>, probably because it swiped bits from &#8220;Jesus Loves Me&#8221; and &#8220;Battle Hymn of the Republic&#8221; while trying to mold them into little Obamaites.</p>
<p>Well, in the spirit of fairness we should provide a counter-song the kids can sing to cleanse their minds of indoctrination and give them a more accurate assessment of our 44th president:<span id="more-239126"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He has an ego so darn large we cannot fit it on a barge</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He said he has accomplishments but we have not seen any yet</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He said he was a capitalist but is loved by many communists</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He said he saved the economy, a claim as bogus as Astrology</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>Chicago Olympics he tried to sell, but Copenhagen didn&#8217;t like the smell</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He said he&#8217;d be transparent but his records are hidden behind lots of cement</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He promised he was one of us, but then he threw us under a bus</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He has so many nutty czars they&#8217;re as useful as clunker cars</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He promised Hope and Change, but all we got was a falling stock exchange</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>Fidel, Hugo and Muammar praised him much, perhaps like them he&#8217;s a bit touched</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>His campaign motto was &#8220;Yes We Can!&#8221; but now we know that was just spam</p>
<p>Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama</p>
<p>He said he was going to save our hide, instead he took us for a ride</p></blockquote>
<p>By the way, the chant reminds me of a &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbs.com/classics/star_trek/video/video.php?pid=i0TZvcPXwl7VtiRl38p1_gY7wg7pWD2Y&amp;play=true">Star Trek&#8221; episode</a> where a bunch of kids are being used by some <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Melvin_Belli">space divorce lawyer</a> in a feathery muumuu.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2009/10/08/if-school-kids-sang-the-truth-about-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
