<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Hollywood &#187; Alfonzo Rachel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/arachel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comedian Katt Williams Bravely Stands Up For America</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/09/08/comedian-katt-williams-bravely-stands-up-for-america/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/09/08/comedian-katt-williams-bravely-stands-up-for-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katt Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=511872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like you, I&#8217;m pretty happy about Katt Williams bushin&#8217; up his tail on a heckler who tried to dis&#8217; America. By telling a Mexican patriot &#8220;to go live in Mexico if he thinks it&#8217;s better than living in America,&#8221; Williams ran the risk of being labeled a sell-out by displaying his patriotism in this PC culture. Yep, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Like you, I&#8217;m pretty happy about Katt Williams bushin&#8217; up his tail on a heckler who tried to dis&#8217; America. By telling a Mexican patriot &#8220;to go live in Mexico if he thinks it&#8217;s better than living in America,&#8221; Williams ran the risk of being labeled a sell-out by displaying his patriotism in this PC culture. Yep, Williams pretty much used his microphone as a club, and went to work on this heckler like he was a piñata:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Video is NSFW:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="485" height="310" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bkNnmun5fZE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="485" height="310" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bkNnmun5fZE?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object><br />
&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>What Katt Williams said to the heckler wasn&#8217;t racist, it was long overdue. Sure I&#8217;ve been saying <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSejgZOe_nE&amp;feature=channel_video_title">the same</a> and I&#8217;m sure you have, as well. But it&#8217;s nice to hear it coming from someone who has a platform like Williams does. Usually people in his position would rather patronize people like that heckler and try to win them over by acknowledging they&#8217;re &#8220;disenfranchised.&#8221; This allows them to look compassionate and morally superior. But that&#8217;s the behavior of a true sellout &#8212; selling out the country that allows people to achieve their dreams in exchange for glorifying yourself by soliciting laughter and applause for cursing it.</p>
<p>Katt Williams breathed fire all over that narrative, and God bless him for it.</p>
<p>Ever since I was a kid I&#8217;ve heard the racist statement, &#8220;Why don&#8217;t you go back to Africa&#8221;, and I&#8217;d have to remind these jackasses, &#8220;I can&#8217;t go back to a place I&#8217;ve never been.&#8221;</p>
<p>Furthermore, I&#8217;ve never flexed African national pride on people. I&#8217;ve never given people a reason to believe I love Africa more than America, so I never deserved the remark.</p>
<p>I love being black, and I love being black in America. Enjoy whatever ethnicity you are! But if you enjoy it to a point where you think your ethnicity makes you superior, then you&#8217;re a jackass.</p>
<p><span id="more-511872"></span></p>
<p>But like Katt Williams I feel that if a person has that much Mexican pride then they should take their behinds over to Mexico. Nobody dragged them over here. Nobody forces them to stay here. Black people were sold by other Africans and dragged over here to be enslaved illegally. But the generations that have been here have long enjoyed the freedom to leave. And I say to my black people, ‘If you think Africa is so much better, you&#8217;re free to move there.’</p>
<p>A lot of Mexicans act like white people were the only people to take their land, yet the ancestors of Mexicans are the ones with the long history of taking land from each other. They would pillage and enslave each other; rape the women, and sacrifice the tribes they conquered to their idols.</p>
<p>Today, Mexico isn&#8217;t doing that great and has a pretty corrupt government, which is why a lot of people want to leave. What cracks me up is that Mexican patriots want to live here &#8212; and not only that, they want to claim the Southwest region of America. Why? So Mexico can have an even bigger territory for the Mexican people to want to leave?</p>
<p>So thank you, Katt Williams. I may not dig all the cursing and what not, but I don&#8217;t think our troops bite their tongues when they&#8217;re defending God&#8217;s blessing of freedom, either. At some point all the profanity may not be as important to Katt Williams, but he is a patriot.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/09/08/comedian-katt-williams-bravely-stands-up-for-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Janeane Garofalo Upholds the Racist Traditions of the Democratic Party!</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/19/janeane-garofalo-upholds-the-racist-traditions-of-the-democratic-party/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/19/janeane-garofalo-upholds-the-racist-traditions-of-the-democratic-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats. ZoNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[janeane garofalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=506780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ewww! Janeane Garofalo&#8217;s&#8217; back and looking like somebody dug up some cat bones and painted a picture of her face on the skull. (This isn’t far-fetched because I believe she thinks with a decomposed cat brain.)
Here she is trying to accuse black conservatives of Stockholm Syndrome, again:

&#8212;&#8211;
 
Okay, here she really is. Anyway&#8230;
Janeane Garofalo wouldn&#8217;t know Stockholm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewww! Janeane Garofalo&#8217;s&#8217; back and looking like somebody dug up some cat bones and painted a picture of her face on the skull. (This isn’t far-fetched because I believe she thinks with a decomposed cat brain.)</p>
<p>Here she is trying to accuse black conservatives of Stockholm Syndrome, again:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="464" height="294" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QMeniffIF0s?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="464" height="294" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QMeniffIF0s?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Okay, here she <a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/08/18/janeane-garofalos-racist-dogwhistle-tells-us-herman-cain-doesnt-have-a-mind-of-his-own/">really is</a>. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>Janeane Garofalo wouldn&#8217;t know Stockholm Syndrome if it were the applicator she uses for her wheat grass enemas.</p>
<p>Stockholm Syndrome would be better applied to a group of people who still vote for the party that: </p>
<ul>
<li>Fought to keep slavery legal.</li>
<li>Founded the KKK.</li>
<li>Imposed Jim Crow laws.</li>
<li>Created the Jim Crow Minstrel to boot  (Thomas D. Rice &#8211; D)</li>
<li>Imposed the Dred Scott Decision.</li>
<li>Revoked special field order 15, or &#8220;40 Acres and a Mule.</li>
<li>Revoked federal positions for blacks.</li>
<li>Pro segregation in schools and military.</li>
</ul>
<p>All these things Democrats were for and Republicans  against.</p>
<p>And no, there was no party switch, that is, unless you&#8217;re talking about black voters. Blacks started voting Democratic long before the supposed “party switch,” before the supposed Southern Strategy. The black community was disenfranchised by Democrats, and then established as a voting stock for the Democratic party as early as FDR&#8217;s first term, as he brought in the entitlement society.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the Dixiecrats went back to the Democrat party, as they said: &#8220;We would vote for a yellow dog before voting Republican.&#8221;   </p>
<p>It would take too much time to list all the Dixiecrats who went back to the Democrat party, but liberals always showcase that cherry-picked exception known as Strom Thurman. Thurman should have remained a Democrat. He would have been forgiven for being a bigot, like lifelong Democrat and former KKK Grand Wizard, Senator Robert Byrd.</p>
<p><span id="more-506780"></span></p>
<p>But Janeane Garofalo says we Black republicans have Stockholm Syndrome. And where is this proof that Herman Cain is being paid off? Where is the proof that any of us conservatives of color are being paid off?</p>
<p>Is Janeane Garofalo so full of herself that she thinks it takes large amounts of money for us to think different than she does? I got news for ya! We take great pleasure in knowing we think different than Janeane Garofalo! It didn&#8217;t take money, either. We did it because it&#8217;s the rigjt thing to do, because people like Janeane Garofalo have the same sour attitude of a slave owner whose ego was bruised because one of the slaves was able to outsmart &#8216;em and escape.</p>
<p>Janeane is bitter because more and more blacks are seeing past and through her.</p>
<p>Black people, if you vote Democrat that’s your choice, but please consider where the real bigotry comes from. We don&#8217;t call you what Democrats call us: Uncle Toms, sell outs, house ni**as, boot lickers, oreos, twinkies, bananas, coconuts &#8230; the list goes on.</p>
<p>These are racist terms used by the Left. That&#8217;s where the real bigotry is.</p>
<p>Please re-evaluate the notion of who does and doesn&#8217;t have Stockholm Syndrome.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/19/janeane-garofalo-upholds-the-racist-traditions-of-the-democratic-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>255</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Gates of Hell&#8217;: A Political Movie About Angry Black Men the Left Won&#8217;t Celebrate</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/05/gates-of-hell-a-political-movie-about-angry-black-men-the-left-wont-celebrate/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/05/gates-of-hell-a-political-movie-about-angry-black-men-the-left-wont-celebrate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Gates of Hell"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=498668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black power. Abortion. Terrorism.
These elements make up the work of the prophetically fictional movie, Gates of Hell by Molotov Mitchell and Illuminati Pictures.  I&#8217;m not going to go into much of what the movie entails. I’ll let the trailers give you an idea and here&#8217;s a link to the synopsis  

&#8212;&#8211;

&#8212;&#8211;
I will tell you the movie has a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black power. Abortion. Terrorism.</p>
<p>These elements make up the work of the prophetically fictional movie, <em>Gates of Hell </em>by Molotov Mitchell and Illuminati Pictures.  I&#8217;m not going to go into much of what the movie entails. I’ll let the trailers give you an idea and here&#8217;s <a href="http://megasupergood.com/showproject.php?id=26">a link</a> to the synopsis  </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="508" height="307" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eU45KI8sC4U?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="508" height="307" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eU45KI8sC4U?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="518" height="311" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4MOPDXbiyQU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="518" height="311" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4MOPDXbiyQU?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I will tell you the movie has a hardcore approach in support of the pro-life issue &#8212; that approach being in the form of black militants that wreak havoc on abortionists. The movie is also causing a bit of a stir, but it&#8217;s not really the liberals and pro-abortionist who are attacking the project, it&#8217;s pro-life conservatives! </p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Children have been aborted in the millions, which means a lot of abortions are getting past the efforts of pro-lifers. I&#8217;m not trying to be contentious, but an effective means to promote the pro-life issue has been wanting. This film is a different tactic; hit the pop culture where they live.  It&#8217;s a volatile subject and some people aren&#8217;t interested in dealing with it. Though a lot of people see abortion as wrong, they don&#8217;t want to interfere with someone else’s choice. They would prefer to avoid the conflict and keep that opinion to themselves as they don&#8217;t want to deal with the wrath of the selfish who value their right to choose over the right to life. </p>
<p><span id="more-498668"></span></p>
<p>Pro-lifers are afraid the left-wingers are going to use this movie to back their assertions that the right is just a bunch of extremists who blow up abortion clinics (which, thankfully, doesn&#8217;t happen often enough to even form a U.S. statistic). But it will only backfire if liberals give any attention to this movie&#8230;</p>
<p>1. The movie reveals the statistics pointing to the genocidal campaign waged by the Left, which is damning to both the abortion industry and Democrats. </p>
<p>2. The Left complaining about a movie where a bunch of angry black men run around with guns would be a first. The entertainment industry has made gazillions off this portrayal and loves it as long as black men are pointing those guns at each other. Well, this time blacks have turned those guns away from each other and turned them against the abortion industry.</p>
<p>3. Though a single person murdered over political discourse is one too many, we dare the left to try to call us out on our fictional violence with <strong>their true-life </strong>record. Virtually every assassination, whether attempted or successful, has been carried out by left wingers. Though I am ashamed to point out the violence exacted by pro-life zealots, they represent a drop in the bucket compared to the violence exacted by the Left.</p>
<p>This movie is not about promoting violence against the abortion industry. Rather, it points out the violence the abortion industry has brought to us.</p>
<p>Furthermore, this film will not hurt the pro-life movement, but how some pro-lifers react to it is another issue. For example, whenever I speak on abortion I pretty much always point to the agenda of Democrats, Margaret Sanger and the genocidal campaign still carried out by Planned Parenthood. I point to the millions of black children who have been killed by Planned Parenthood. Unfortunately, I sometimes get responses from white conservatives saying, “White children get killed by Planned Parenthood too.&#8221; To those white conservatives I would say that you obviously don&#8217;t pay much attention to my work. I don&#8217;t have a chip on my shoulder, and I do not support anybody that has a chip on their shoulder about racism. </p>
<p>My point is that Republicans have a golden opportunity to turn the racist history of Democrats back on them. Show the black community that you care about their <strong>right to LIFE</strong>, and show who has been trying to deny them their inalienable rights granted by God.</p>
<p>&#8220;Gates of Hell&#8221; is about that bigger picture.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2011/08/05/gates-of-hell-a-political-movie-about-angry-black-men-the-left-wont-celebrate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Moore Doesn&#8217;t Speak for Me</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/11/28/michael-moore-doesnt-speak-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/11/28/michael-moore-doesnt-speak-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demcorats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=419705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found myself in a bit of a grouchy mood when cud-chewer Michael Moore said something to the effect of White America bein’ all mad about a black president.
Really? It was the white vote that got him elected. And if you’re so sure about your statement, then does that mean you (Michael Moore) have a problem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found myself in a bit of a grouchy mood when cud-chewer Michael Moore said something to the effect of <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/11/13/michael-moore-schooled-real-time-anti-obama-sentiment-isnt-racist" target="_blank">White America bein’ all mad about a black president.</a></p>
<p>Really? It was the white vote that got him elected. And if you’re so sure about your statement, then does that mean you (Michael Moore) have a problem with Obama based on his ethnicity?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2010/11/moore.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-420773  aligncenter" title="moore" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2010/11/moore.jpg" alt="" width="211" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Is there somethin’ you’re trying to avoid telling us? Looks to me like you’re trying to mitigate your own bigotry by broad-brushing everybody with your disposition. That’s right. You’re projecting, you miserable jackass; which makes sense because you’re a socialist and you expect people to share in a miserable existence.</p>
<p>I’m sick of white liberals like Michael Moore who patronize black people and try to stay in their good graces by falsely accusing white people of racism, and then try to further validate it with some bogus display of self effacement.  This joker is a prime example of how white democrats feel that they’re the ones who are tuned in to the black community. They can speak for us. They know us, and where that notion comes from is due to them thinking that they own us.<span id="more-419705"></span></p>
<p>And the sadder part is, is that too many black people are suckered by this pandering, and shack there shackles like it’s a damn tambourine, singin’ the praises of Democrats.</p>
<p>Michael Moore goes on to say some junk about Obama getting the <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/11/13/michael-moore-schooled-real-time-anti-obama-sentiment-isnt-racist" target="_blank">youth vote and not the vote of the older folks</a>.</p>
<p>You know? It should speak volumes that Obama got the youth vote, and not the vote of the matured. Hello! The matured have had some time to think through some things, live through some things, learn from some things.</p>
<p>But Michael Moore doesn’t learn, because his backwardness causes him to use his mouth twice as much as his ears. What’s more, Michael Moore hates America. The TSA should be crawlin’ over that wildebeest like fleas.</p>
<p>But no. This America hater isn’t a suspect. Those of us who enjoy this republic are the suspects. Janet Napolitano thinks of us as right wing extremist, and dangerous. Obama has referred to us as the enemy.</p>
<p>Now I can understand a pat down. If you want to get into a club you’re most likely gonna get patted down. You don’t want drama to start up in the club, and you definitely don’t want none on a plane. But a pat down is one thing, and we’re steppin’ into the realm of a frisky frisk. The PATRIOT Act never demanded that I use my webcam to show national security my junk. Ya hear that Michael Moore?</p>
<p>How ‘bout we let the military fully do their job. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9jIu_DI15E" target="_blank">How about allowing water-boarding if necessary, Ms. Behar?</a> “Why. Don’t you get water-boarded?&#8221; she asks. Um, because I’m not involved in a mass murder plot.</p>
<p>If Joy Bahar really disagrees with water-boarding then she wouldn’t even wish it upon people she disagrees with. But the sad part is that she is so quick to recommend it for a person she disagrees with but is offended that it would be done to a person who would saw a man’s head off.</p>
<p>This is the backwards mentality of the Left. Why doesn’t our government show the kind of zeal they’re demonstrating with airport security and do that with border security? The liberal government wants us to learn how to live with terrorism like herpes.</p>
<p>The terrorists are going to find a way. Hell, it can even get to a point where a big group of ‘em book a flight together, and the night before the flight they load up on some beans; cause at this point farts aren’t considered a potential threat, and a tummy full of flatulence ain’t gonna set off any alarms.</p>
<p>So they can get on the plane and just start lettin’ em slip at cruising altitude. The passengers will be trapped aboard a cabin filling up with funky vapors and won’t know where it’s coming from because the terrorists have been well trained to release the farts silently every time. Taking silent but violent to a whole new level, right?</p>
<p>And just when enough farts have been released to trigger the oxygen mask, they’ll activate a discrete detonator and bam:</p>
<p>A Fart-twah at thirty thousand feet.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/11/28/michael-moore-doesnt-speak-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC: &#8216;More Colorful&#8217; or More Patronizing?</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/09/23/nbc-more-colorful-or-more-patronizing/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/09/23/nbc-more-colorful-or-more-patronizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Colorful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercovers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=397133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC&#8217;s &#8220;more colorful.&#8221; Are they talkin’ about that fruity colored Peacock when they say that, or are they talking about their new line up of shows that feature some black folk? Oh, how they pat themselves on the back for finally makin’ some prime time shows with leading people of color in this late year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/lenox-second-city/2010/09/nbcs-more-colorful-fall-tv-line.html">more colorful</a>.&#8221; Are they talkin’ about that fruity colored Peacock when they say that, or are they talking about their new line up of shows that feature some black folk? Oh, how they pat themselves on the back for finally makin’ some prime time shows with leading people of color in this late year of two THOUSAND *#!?* TEN!!!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="484" height="288" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vzUFZCxC46U?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="484" height="288" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vzUFZCxC46U?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbc.com/undercovers/"><em>Undercovers</em></a> is among the new line-up meant to pander to us “colorful people.” It stars two very attractive actors: Boris Kodjoe and Gugu Mbatha-Raw and I reckon that since we’re not smart enough to see that they’re Black, NBC had to give us a little nudge to point that out to us. The actors are talented and good looking, but I guess NBC wants the world to know that they’ve figured out that Black people could be good looking and talented enough to have a prime-time show in the form of a romantic action-comedy.</p>
<p>Wow thanks, NBC!</p>
<p>NBC, just like a lot of people can’t just see<strong> Americans</strong>. They see ethnicities.<br />
What’s worse is that too many people see people who aren’t white as “ethnic.” Let me remind you that white people are also an ethnic group. Every one of us are within an ethnic group.</p>
<p>So when a person refers to me as “ethnic,” I’m like, what the hell do you mean by that?<span id="more-397133"></span></p>
<p>Yeah, I belong to an ethnic group, but I’m no more or less ethnic than Larry the Cable Guy.</p>
<p>So again, here is another instance that will lead to, &#8220;How come it’s okay for black people to have Black Entertainment Television? There would be be an uproar if there was White Entertainment Television.&#8221;</p>
<p>I’ve heard that for as long as BET has been around, but I gotta tell ya, I myself have always said that televison has always been White Entertainment Television.</p>
<p>Proof positive:  Here comes NBC with their new slogan, “More Colorful.” Meaning, here’s a little something to pacify you Black folks. Yep, off the liberals go, patronizing people of color. </p>
<p>The sad part is, Black people know that Hollywood is racist, yet they vote for the same people that Hollywood picks to steer the country more and more to the left.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/09/23/nbc-more-colorful-or-more-patronizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>151</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tea Partier Responds to Sheryl Crow</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/07/05/a-tea-partier-responds-to-sheryl-crow/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/07/05/a-tea-partier-responds-to-sheryl-crow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Crow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toilet paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=370462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Shut up, Sheryl! Actually, I don&#8217;t mean that. She has the right to say what she wants, and I have the right to disagree. As you will hear and see in this lil&#8217; viddy! Dang, that was some straight Dr. Seuss-level rhymin&#8217;!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV9tYXz8EAE&amp;feature=channel"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/qV9tYXz8EAE&amp;feature=channel/default.jpg"/></a></p>
<p><span id="more-370462"></span></p>
<p>Shut up, Sheryl! Actually, I don&#8217;t mean that. She has the right to say what she wants, and I have the right to disagree. As you will hear and see in this lil&#8217; viddy! Dang, that was some straight Dr. Seuss-level rhymin&#8217;!</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/07/05/a-tea-partier-responds-to-sheryl-crow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Ain&#8217;t Black Enough For Bill Maher</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/06/02/obama-aint-black-enough-for-bill-maher/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/06/02/obama-aint-black-enough-for-bill-maher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=355718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a bit of a departure for me, as I prefer to do video rants, but by the time it gets done, Bill Maher and his comments will be worth talking about even less than they already are.

As you already know, over the weekend, Bill Maher said:
&#8220;I thought when we elected a black president, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit of a departure for me, as I prefer to do video rants, but by the time it gets done, Bill Maher and his comments will be worth talking about even less than they already are.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-355754 aligncenter" title="maher517" src="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/2010/06/maher517.jpg" alt="maher517" width="413" height="266" /></p>
<p>As you already know, over the weekend, Bill Maher said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I thought when we elected a black president, we were going to get a black president. You know, this [BP oil spill] is where I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting with the BP CEOs, you know, where he lifts up his shirt so you can see the gun in his pants. That&#8217;s &#8212; (in black man voice) &#8216;we&#8217;ve got a motherfu**ing problem here?&#8217; Shoot somebody in the foot.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Now despite all the PC stuff, the left-wing still proves to be the ones doing the majority of the stereotyping. And I&#8217;m pretty sure they had a medic on stand-by  in case Maher&#8217;s guts ruptured from him using more testosterone than he ever has in his life to try to pull off his best &#8220;black&#8221; impression.</p>
<p>This is what black people are to Bill Maher. This is what we&#8217;re supposed to be; gun-toting thugs. And if we&#8217;re not, then we&#8217;re just docile Uncle Toms who wanna be white.<span id="more-355718"></span></p>
<p>Truth is, there is no behavior that could satisfy Bill Maher because he&#8217;s a racist, and a very confused individual. He&#8217;s pro-gun-control, yet he wants the president to brandish a weapon at the table with BP. But when it comes to dealing with our enemies; the ones who get a special thrill up their leg when they cut off the heads of Jews, well no &#8212; those are the ones we should just have talks with.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pay much mind to Bill Maher; a bitter cynic whose veins pump with spoiled milk, and just another patronizing racist. I&#8217;ve seen his show before. I know what it is. I&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that I don&#8217;t dig it, therefore I don&#8217;t watch it. However, I&#8217;m aware of the comments he makes because the more outrageous ones end up getting forwarded to me.</p>
<p>So I watch this dude who has this strange resemblance to Otto from <em>Star Trek DS9</em>, and just like all liberal elites he feels as though he&#8217;s some kind of authority on what black people are supposed to be. It reminds me of when clean-cut white frat boys would come up to me whispering, &#8220;Hey, brah. Do you know where we can score some kind?&#8221; And I&#8217;d be like, &#8220;Why the hell are you asking me? You&#8217;re the ones doing it. Go fask some some other clean-cut white frat boys like yourselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>Guess those liberal colleges they learn from aren&#8217;t doing much to instill that kind of deductive reasoning.</p>
<p>Anyway, Maher just makes my job easier when it comes to pointing out who the real racists are. The hard part is getting people to see the painfully obvious. It&#8217;s like trying to point out something as obvious as figuring out how to pour pee out of a boot with directions on the sole of it. (Thanks, Pryor)</p>
<p>Admittedly I do generalize when it comes to liberals, but I used to be one, so there&#8217;s my license. ; ) On the other hand, Bill Maher has never been black. I&#8217;m sure according to Bill Maher I&#8217;ve never been black either.</p>
<p>In the end, though, I still respect Bill Maher&#8217;s freedom to say what he does, and I&#8217;m certainly free to disagree.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/06/02/obama-aint-black-enough-for-bill-maher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>311</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZoNation: America Loves Immigrants, It&#8217;s the &#8216;Illegal&#8217; Part We Take Issue With</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/31/we-dont-need-no-steeeenking-borders/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/31/we-dont-need-no-steeeenking-borders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=354426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s98DX_1JPYI"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/s98DX_1JPYI/default.jpg"/></a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/31/we-dont-need-no-steeeenking-borders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Baggers Don&#8217;t Even Pay Taxes</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/27/t-baggers-dont-even-pay-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/27/t-baggers-dont-even-pay-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teabaggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=351014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9LLRBSfFFw"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/z9LLRBSfFFw/default.jpg"/></a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/27/t-baggers-dont-even-pay-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m a Conservative Republican</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/16/conservatism-according-to-one-of-them-hollywooders/</link>
		<comments>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/16/conservatism-according-to-one-of-them-hollywooders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alfonzo Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=346946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_QadL7MKk8"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/f_QadL7MKk8/default.jpg"/></a></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2010/05/16/conservatism-according-to-one-of-them-hollywooders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

