Comments on: When Does Life Begin, Y’all?

By: My Homepage

My Homepage — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:03:26 +0000

… [Trackback]…

[...] Find More Informations here: bighollywood.breitbart.com/arachel/2009/11/11/when-does-life-begin-yall/ [...]…

By: garment business daily

garment business daily — Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:52:00 +0000

Gems form the internet…

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……

By: Mo_

Mo_ — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:29:46 +0000

Life begins when science says it does – at conception.

And guess what? God also agrees with this science!

By: Angela

Angela — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:21:15 +0000

So if I kill you while you are sleeping, do I get a lighter penalty? You were at a lower state of consciousness. Babies in the womb are conscious of their surroundings. They are in a stage of their growth. Just like a newborn grows to be a toddler. A embryo grows to be a fetus grows to be a baby. Is a baby less of a life, because it has less of a consciousness than a toddler? Do you agree with Peter Singer that parents should be able to kill their offspring up to 1 month after it is born due to this consciousness debate? How does birth suddenly give a baby a consciousness? 2 minutes before when it was in the womb- was there a little man handing consciences out at the door? A new born is aware of its surrounding and starts learning immediately. It is incredible that you think that this ability just turns on at birth.

By: Angela

Angela — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:11:04 +0000

You made a unselfish difficult decision. My friend did also. She has a down syndrome child who is a joy. He teaches us something new everyday. We call him God's child. He knows nothing but love. God Bless you and your family.

By: Angela

Angela — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:06:35 +0000

Our laws alone protect the unborn. Just because you are not a citizen or a person born you are subject to the same protections as natuaralized citizens. This is why when a pregnant woman is murdered at a certain point in her pregnancy, it is considered 2 victims. The child has not been born, nor has it been naturalized, but it still is protected under the law thus created equal. The only thing that differentiates a smaller/larger term fetus from being protected is viability. Viability has changed DRASTICALLY since Roe v. Wade. I believe that in 73 it was 6 1/2 months. Recently a child lived who was born at 22 weeks. So viabilitiy is clearly not something we should consider a constant when we are discussing when a baby suddenly gets "rights."

By: Angela

Angela — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:51:35 +0000

I was replying to some of the comments that rjc made, and if you read all his comments- there were some openly hostile comments regarding religious people. I accidently replied under your comment. Now about voting for an atheist. Of course, I would vote for an atheist if he shared my political views. A lot of atheist are pro-life, although I am not a one issue vote. The atheist would have to be Conservative.

The mention of state sanctioned religion was to prove a point of how entrenched religion was in the daily lives of the founders. I do not want a 'state' religion. I have more of a problem with the decision to ban religion from the public square in the last few decades. Re: children praying in school.. again I direct you attention to a previous post which references this. I came late to this post, and read them all in one shot- my posts were kind of a hodge podge of all of them.

By: Mike in Colorado

Mike in Colorado — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:51:38 +0000

Hey there mister, Some of the founding fathers did not believe in god at all !!!

By: DontTreadOnMe

DontTreadOnMe — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:45:09 +0000

Well, go ahead and source me some quotes then and enlighten me on who says these sorts of things, because I'd like to know.
And I wouldn't consider them "pro-choice" so much as "pro-decency". Attempting to FORCE a woman to carry a child to term even if it means it may kill her and/or the child is barbaric. We don't need anyone intruding on a woman's personal decisions after she's suffered other atrocities, either- while it would just pile another atrocity on, the woman has suffered and needs to feel in control of SOMETHING. What she decides as far as her pregnancy goes should be left to her.
What most conservatives/Republicans etc are against is the late-term, contraception-substitute, for convenience type abortions, and the fight to keep parents out of the loop. And it's surprising that more blacks aren't joining their voices, considering that Planned Parenthood is ending more young black lives than inner-city violence ever did.

By: HumanPersonJr

HumanPersonJr — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:05:05 +0000

Make friends with an undertaker. He's the last person on Earth who'll let you down.