What Did Kumar Know, and When Did He Know It?

by Alexander Marlow

Meet the face of Obama’s Ministry of Propaganda: Kal Penn.  Best known for being one of the hapless stoners in the sex-bong-fart franchise “Harold & Kumar,” Penn was brought on to the Obama Administration to be the President’s Associate Director of Public Engagement.  After failing to grab more than a headline or two in the five months since his hiring, he has entered the fray in a big way as the White House representative to a National Endowment for the Arts conference call promoting the Obama administration’s political agenda.

kumar nea

Patrick Courrielche reported on the call this morning:

Kalpen Modi, Associate Director of the White House Office of Public Engagement, was to represent the White House and key representatives from the National Endowment for the Arts were also to participate.

Did you catch that? Kalpen Modi is the given name of the actor known as Kal Penn.

Naturally, Penn’s decision to leave a co-starring role on Fox’s hit series “House” and perhaps delaying the release of “A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas” garnered due media coverage.  Some at Big Hollywood felt it premature to cast judgment at that point despite the implications of an increasingly blurred line between entertainment and politics. Still, while actors have been known to run for office, leaving the red carpet for the red tape of government bureaucracy was, in retrospect, fishy.

While Penn bided his time, waiting for an opportunity to parlay his Hollywood chops into a victory for the administration, this NEA story began to unfold and now we’re at a point where George Will wondered aloud on This Week if the NEA has broken any laws.

So the question is, what did Kumar know, and when did he know it?

Was coordinating a transformation of the NEA into a propaganda arm of the Obama Administration his role from Day 1?  Was this a plan of attack handed down from the President himself?

An appeal to the cult of personality is an essential ingredient to this adminstration’s success, and using Kumar to sell the Obama agenda to the arts community on behalf of the White House is worthy of our ire.

The Kumar story emerges on the day Obama addressed students, complete with lesson plan (a repeated theme in the lesson is “What is the president asking me to do?”).  Moreover, just last week Ashton Kutcher’s “I Pledge” video resurfaced in a public school (to parental outrage) where Kutcher and a motley crew of celebrity activists “pledge to serve our President.”

Whether or not Obama actually coordinated with Kutcher, Demi Moore, and the Asian Guy from MadTV to make that video is not the point–after all, Obama might not have been able to fit them into his schedule between golfing and brunch with will.i.am—but Kumar works for him… and for us. He ought to be held accountable.

A historical trend exists in totalitarian states where art lionizes its leadership, while in free states art holds power accountable.  Same goes for the mainstream press.  Given Obama and Kumar’s NEA strategy, it is clear that with regards to the arts world, we are headed down a path where the state’s influence spreads wider than it ever has, and the man with the most information might be the one who just passed the blunt.

Color me a narc, but let’s bring him in for questioning.